Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Construction Project, 45537-45539 [05-15617]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 1, 2005.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–15619 Filed 8–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
§ 165.1321
[Amended]
Background and Purpose
2. In § 165.1321, in paragraph (c)(3),
remove the phrase ‘‘47°03′01″N,
122°54′21″W’’ and add, in its place, the
phrase ‘‘47°03′04″N, 122°54′19.5″W’’.
I
Dated: July 26, 2005.
Stephen P. Metruck,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05–15565 Filed 8–5–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
33 CFR Part 165
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[CGD13–05–031]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Protection of Military
Cargo, Captain of the Port Zone Puget
Sound, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard Captain of
the Port Puget Sound published in the
Federal Register of December 10, 2004,
a final rule concerning security zones
for the protection of military cargo
loading and unloading operations in the
navigable waters of Puget Sound.
Wording in § 165.1321(c)(3) is being
corrected to fix a typographical error in
the latitude and longitude of the last
point listed in the security zone. This
document makes this correction.
DATES: This rule is effective August 8,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Jessica Hagen,
c/o Captain of the Port Puget Sound,
Coast Guard Sector Seattle, 1519
Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134
at (206) 217–6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard published a document in the
Federal Register on December 10, 2004
(69 FR 71709), which amended 33 CFR
165.1321 by adding Budd Inlet,
Olympia, WA as a permanent security
zone. In this document, paragraph (c)(3)
of the regulatory text contained a
typographical error in the latitude and
longitude of the last point listed in the
security zone.
I Accordingly, 33 CFR 165.1321 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:56 Aug 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
33 CFR Part 165
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma
Narrows Bridge Construction Project
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
during the construction of temporary
aerial scaffolding, catwalk,
superstructure suspension system, main
cable wires, cable bands, and suspender
ropes being used for the Tacoma
Narrows Bridge construction project.
The Coast Guard is taking this action to
safeguard the public from hazards
associated with the transport and
construction of the cable wires and
cable bands being used to construct the
catwalk for the new bridge. Entry into
this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or his designated
representatives.
This rule is effective daily 5 a.m.
to 9 p.m., Pacific daylight time, from
August 3 to August 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD13–05–
033 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard Sector Seattle,
1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA,
98134, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Jessica Hagen,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector Seattle, at (206) 217–6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) has not
been published for this regulation and
good cause exists for making it effective
without publication of an NPRM in the
Federal Register. Publishing a NPRM
would be contrary to public interest
since immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels and persons
that transit in the vicinity of the Tacoma
Narrows Bridge. If normal notice and
comment procedures were followed,
this rule would not become effective
until after the date of the event.
Discussion of Rule
Coast Guard
[CGD13–05–033]
SUMMARY:
45537
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is adopting a
temporary safety zone regulation on the
waters of Tacoma Narrows, Washington,
for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
construction project. The Coast Guard
has determined it is necessary to limit
access to 250 yards on either side of a
line from the approximate position of
47°16′15″ N, 122°33′15″ W, to 47°15′54″
N, 122°32′49″ W, to 47°15′49″ N,
122°32′43″ W, in order to safeguard
people and property from hazards
associated with this project. These
safety hazards include, but are not
limited to, hazards to navigation,
collisions with the cables, and collisions
with work vessels and barges. The Coast
Guard, through this action, intends to
promote the safety of personnel, vessels,
and facilities in the area. Entry into
these zones will be prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his representative. These safety zones
will be enforced by Coast Guard
personnel. The Captain of the Port may
be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
significant under the regulatory policies
and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this temporary rule to be so minimal
that a full Regulatory Evaluation under
paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory
policies and procedures of DHS is
unnecessary. This expectation is based
on the fact that the regulated area
established by this regulation would
encompass a small area that should not
impact commercial or recreational
traffic. For the above reasons, the Coast
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
45538
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Guard does not anticipate any
significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit this portion
of Tacoma Narrows during the time this
regulation is in effect. The zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
due to its short duration and small area.
Because the impacts of this rule are
expected to be so minimal, the Coast
Guard certifies under 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612) that this temporary rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) section. Small businesses may
send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or
otherwise determine compliance with
Federal regulations to the Small
Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the
Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency’s responsiveness to
small business. If you wish to comment
on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–
734–3247).
Collection of Information
This temporary rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:56 Aug 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Federalism
We have analyzed this temporary rule
under Executive Order 13132 and have
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism under that
Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This temporary rule would not effect
a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This temporary rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian tribal governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. It has not been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy
Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. from August
3 to August 20, 2005, a temporary
§ 165.T13–013 is added to read as
follows:
I
§ 165.T13–013 Safety Zone: New Tacoma
Narrows Bridge Construction Project.
(a) Location. The following is a safety
zone: All waters of the Tacoma Narrows,
Washington State, within 250 yards on
either side of a line with the points of
47°16′15″ N, 122°33′15″ W, to 47°15′59″
N, 122°32′49″ W, to 47°15′49″ N,
122°32′43″ W. [Datum: NAD 1983]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in Section
165.23 of this part, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the zone except
for those persons involved in the
construction of the new Tacoma
Narrows Bridge, supporting personnel,
or other vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives. Vessels and persons
granted authorization to enter the safety
zone shall obey all lawful orders or
directions of the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
(c) Applicable dates. This section
applies from 5 a.m. until 9 p.m., Pacific
daylight time, from August 3 to August
20, 2005.
Dated: July 29, 2005.
Mark J. Huebschman,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05–15617 Filed 8–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[RME Docket Number R08–OAR–2005–ND–
0001; FRL–7942–4]
Clean Air Act Approval and
Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plan Revision for
North Dakota; Revisions to the Air
Pollution Control Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action approving certain revisions to the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) as
submitted by the Governor of North
Dakota with a letter dated April 11,
2003. The revisions affect certain
portions of air pollution control rules
regarding permitting and prevention of
significant deterioration. This action is
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:56 Aug 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
being taken under section 110 of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
7, 2005, without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comment by
September 7, 2005. If adverse comment
is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. R08–OAR–
2005–ND–0001, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp.
Regional Materials in EDOCKET (RME),
EPA’s electronic public docket and
comment system for regional actions, is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: long.richard@epa.gov and
platt.amy@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Richard R. Long, Director, Air
and Radiation Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
Mailcode 8P–AR, 999 18th Street, Suite
300, Denver, Colorado 80202–2466.
• Hand Delivery: Richard R. Long,
Director, Air and Radiation Program,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 999
18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado
80202–2466. Such deliveries are only
accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.
to 4:55 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. R08–OAR–2005–ND–
0001. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available at https://docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/index.jsp, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA’s
Regional Materials in EDOCKET and
Federal regulations.gov Web site are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45539
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA, without going through
EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit
EDOCKET online or see the Federal
Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102).
For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the Regional Materials in
EDOCKET index at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
Regional Materials in EDOCKET or in
hard copy at the Air and Radiation
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, 999 18th
Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado
80202–2466. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Platt, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 8, (303) 312–6449,
platt.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Revisions in the April 11, 2003 Submittal
That are the Subject of this Document
IV. Section 110(l)
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 151 (Monday, August 8, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45537-45539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15617]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD13-05-033]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone Regulations, New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Construction
Project
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone during
the construction of temporary aerial scaffolding, catwalk,
superstructure suspension system, main cable wires, cable bands, and
suspender ropes being used for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge construction
project. The Coast Guard is taking this action to safeguard the public
from hazards associated with the transport and construction of the
cable wires and cable bands being used to construct the catwalk for the
new bridge. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or his designated representatives.
DATES: This rule is effective daily 5 a.m. to 9 p.m., Pacific daylight
time, from August 3 to August 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD13-05-033 and are available for
inspection or copying at the Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard
Sector Seattle, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA, 98134, between 8
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade Jessica Hagen,
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Seattle, at (206)
217-6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
has not been published for this regulation and good cause exists for
making it effective without publication of an NPRM in the Federal
Register. Publishing a NPRM would be contrary to public interest since
immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels and
persons that transit in the vicinity of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. If
normal notice and comment procedures were followed, this rule would not
become effective until after the date of the event.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is adopting a temporary safety zone regulation on
the waters of Tacoma Narrows, Washington, for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
construction project. The Coast Guard has determined it is necessary to
limit access to 250 yards on either side of a line from the approximate
position of 47[deg]16'15'' N, 122[deg]33'15'' W, to 47[deg]15'54'' N,
122[deg]32'49'' W, to 47[deg]15'49'' N, 122[deg]32'43'' W, in order to
safeguard people and property from hazards associated with this
project. These safety hazards include, but are not limited to, hazards
to navigation, collisions with the cables, and collisions with work
vessels and barges. The Coast Guard, through this action, intends to
promote the safety of personnel, vessels, and facilities in the area.
Entry into these zones will be prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his representative. These safety zones will be
enforced by Coast Guard personnel. The Captain of the Port may be
assisted by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies
and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this temporary rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the
regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This
expectation is based on the fact that the regulated area established by
this regulation would encompass a small area that should not impact
commercial or recreational traffic. For the above reasons, the Coast
[[Page 45538]]
Guard does not anticipate any significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
this portion of Tacoma Narrows during the time this regulation is in
effect. The zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities due to its short duration and
small area. Because the impacts of this rule are expected to be so
minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) that this temporary rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the (FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) section. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This temporary rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this temporary rule under Executive Order 13132
and have determined that this rule does not have implications for
federalism under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This temporary rule would not effect a taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This temporary rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian tribal governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L.
[[Page 45539]]
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. From 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. from August 3 to August 20, 2005, a temporary
Sec. 165.T13-013 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-013 Safety Zone: New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Construction
Project.
(a) Location. The following is a safety zone: All waters of the
Tacoma Narrows, Washington State, within 250 yards on either side of a
line with the points of 47[deg]16'15'' N, 122[deg]33'15'' W, to
47[deg]15'59'' N, 122[deg]32'49'' W, to 47[deg]15'49'' N,
122[deg]32'43'' W. [Datum: NAD 1983]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Section 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
the zone except for those persons involved in the construction of the
new Tacoma Narrows Bridge, supporting personnel, or other vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives. Vessels and persons granted authorization to enter the
safety zone shall obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain
of the Port or his designated representative.
(c) Applicable dates. This section applies from 5 a.m. until 9
p.m., Pacific daylight time, from August 3 to August 20, 2005.
Dated: July 29, 2005.
Mark J. Huebschman,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05-15617 Filed 8-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P