Notice of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board Membership, 45483 [05-15499]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices
limited exception to the Exchange’s
priority rules concerning synthetic
option orders.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any inappropriate burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2005–31 and should
be submitted on or before August 26,
2005.
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
III. Solicitation of Comments
and regulations thereunder applicable to
Interested persons are invited to
a national securities exchange,11 and, in
submit written data, views, and
particular, with the requirements of
arguments concerning the foregoing,
section 6(b) of the Act 12 and the rules
including whether the proposed rule
and regulations thereunder. The
change, as amended, is consistent with
Commission finds that the proposed
the Act. Comments may be submitted by rule change, as amended, is consistent
any of the following methods:
with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,13 which
requires, among other things, that the
Electronic Comments
rules of an exchange be designed to
• Use the Commission’s Internet
promote just and equitable principles of
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
trade, to remove impediments to and
rules/sro.shtml); or
perfect the mechanism of a free and
• Send an e-mail to ruleopen market, and to protect investors
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
and the public interest. The
Number SR–Phlx–2005–31 on the
Commission notes that the priority rules
subject line.
with respect to the execution of
Paper Comments
synthetic option orders on other options
exchanges are similar to the Phlx’s
• Send paper comments in triplicate
proposed rule change.14 In general, such
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
rules serve to reduce the risk of
Securities and Exchange Commission,
incomplete or inadequate executions of
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
synthetic option orders by allowing the
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
synthetic option orders to have priority
All submissions should refer to File
over bids and offers of crowd
Number SR–Phlx–2005–31. This file
participants who are bidding or offering
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the only for the option component of the
synthetic option order but only subject
Commission process and review your
to restrictions such as those proposed by
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will Phlx. For example, the proposed rule
post all comments on the Commission’s change would continue to protect the
priority of public customer orders on
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
the limit order book. In addition, Phlx’s
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
proposed rule change protects the
submission, all subsequent
priority of crowd participants who are
amendments, all written statements
willing to participate in the synthetic
with respect to the proposed rule
option order at the net debit or credit
change that are filed with the
price.
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
11 In approving this rule, the Commission notes
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than that it has considered its impact on efficiency,
competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
those that may be withheld from the
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
public in accordance with the
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
14 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
available for inspection and copying in
20294 (October 17, 1983), 48 FR 49114 (October 24,
1983) (approving SR–CBOE–83–4); 47959 (May 30,
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be 2003), 68 FR 34441 (June 9, 2003) (approving SR–
CBOE–2002–05); 44955 (October 18, 2001), 66 FR
available for inspection and copying at
53819 (October 24, 2001) (approving SR–ISE–2001–
the principal office of Phlx. All
18); and 46646 (October 11, 2002), 67 FR 64428
(October 18, 2002) (approving SR–ISE–2002–20).
comments received will be posted
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:34 Aug 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45483
The Commission finds good cause,
pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,15
for approving the proposed rule change,
as amended, prior to the thirtieth day
after the date of publication of the
notice of the filing thereof in the
Federal Register. The Commission notes
that the proposed rule change is similar
to Chicago Board Options Exchange
Rule 6.45A(b)(iii) and International
Stock Exchange Rule 722,16 which were
previously approved by the Commission
after notice and comment, and therefore
does not raise any new regulatory
issues.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act 17 that the
proposed rule change, as amended (SR–
Phlx–2005–31), is hereby approved on
an accelerated basis for a pilot period to
expire on December 31, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4231 Filed 8–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Notice of Senior Executive Service
Performance Review Board
Membership
Title 5, U.S. Code, section 4314(c)(4)
of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978,
Public Law 95–454, requires that the
appointment of Performance Review
Board members be published in the
Federal Register.
The following persons will serve on
the Performance Review Board which
oversees the evaluation of performance
appraisals of Senior Executive Service
members of the Social Security
Administration.
Nancy Berryhill*, Nicholas M.
Blatchford, Michael G. Gallagher,
Rogelio Gomez, Myrtle S. Habersham,
Nancy A. McCullough, Gregory Pace*,
Ronald Raborg*, Donna Siegel*, Felicita
Sola-Carter, Thomas J. Tobin, Manuel
Vaz, and Alice H. Wade.
* New Member
Dated: July 28, 2005.
Reginald F. Wells,
Deputy Commissioner for Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 05–15499 Filed 8–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
15 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
supra note 14.
17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
16 See
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 45483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15499]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Notice of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board
Membership
Title 5, U.S. Code, section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform
Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the appointment of
Performance Review Board members be published in the Federal Register.
The following persons will serve on the Performance Review Board
which oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals of Senior
Executive Service members of the Social Security Administration.
Nancy Berryhill*, Nicholas M. Blatchford, Michael G. Gallagher,
Rogelio Gomez, Myrtle S. Habersham, Nancy A. McCullough, Gregory Pace*,
Ronald Raborg*, Donna Siegel*, Felicita Sola-Carter, Thomas J. Tobin,
Manuel Vaz, and Alice H. Wade.
* New Member
Dated: July 28, 2005.
Reginald F. Wells,
Deputy Commissioner for Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 05-15499 Filed 8-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
