United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program; Notice on Automatic Identification of Certain Nonimmigrants Exiting the United States at Select Land Border Ports-of-Entry, 44934-44938 [05-15487]
Download as PDF
44934
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2005 / Notices
Dated: July 19, 2005.
Steven M. Ferguson,
Director, Division of Technology Development
and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 05–15346 Filed 8–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[DHS 2005–0011]
RIN 1650–AA01
United States Visitor and Immigrant
Status Indicator Technology Program;
Notice on Automatic Identification of
Certain Nonimmigrants Exiting the
United States at Select Land Border
Ports-of-Entry
Border and Transportation
Security Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security has established the United
States Visitor and Immigrant Status
Indicator Technology Program, an
integrated, automated entry-exit system
that records the arrival and departure of
aliens; verifies aliens’ identities; and
authenticates aliens’ travel documents
through comparison of biometric
identifiers. On August 31, 2004, the
Department of Homeland Security
implemented the second phase of the
United States Visitor and Immigrant
Status Indicator Technology Program by
publishing an interim rule in the
Federal Register authorizing collection
of biometric data from travelers upon
admission at the 50 most highly
trafficked land border ports-of-entry.
This Notice informs the public of the
further expansion of the second phase of
the program by establishing a limited
testing or proof of concept protocol for
automatically documenting the exits
and any subsequent re-entries of
nonimmigrant travelers at five United
States land border ports-of-entry
crossings utilizing radio frequency
identification (RFID) technology. The
purpose of this testing is to determine
if RFID technology can improve the
efficiency of processing individuals who
seek to enter or exit the United States at
a land border port-of-entry. This
program of testing will last
approximately one year.
DATES: Effective Dates: This Notice is
effective August 4, 2005. Written
comments must be submitted on or
before October 3, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Aug 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
You may submit comments
identified by DHS–2005–0011 to the
Docket Management Facility at the EPA.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.epa.gov/
edocket. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments at that Web site.
• Mail: Written comments may be
submitted to Craig Howie, US–VISIT,
Border and Transportation Security;
Department of Homeland Security; 1616
North Fort Myer Drive, 18th Floor,
Arlington, VA 22209.
Submitted comments may be
inspected at 1616 North Ft. Myer Drive,
Arlington, VA 22209 between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday
except Federal holidays. Arrangements
to inspect submitted comments should
be made in advance by calling (202)
298–5200. You may also find this
docket on the Internet at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Craig Howie, Senior Regulatory Analyst,
US–VISIT, Border and Transportation
Security, Department of Homeland
Security, 1616 Fort Myer Drive, 18th
Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22209, (202)
298–5200.
ADDRESSES:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1184, 1185, 1258,
1281, 1282, 1301–1306, E.O. 13323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority for US–VISIT
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) established the United
States Visitor and Immigrant Status
Indicator Technology Program (US–
VISIT) in accordance with several
statutory mandates that collectively
require DHS to create an integrated,
automated entry and exit system (entryexit system) that records the arrival and
departure of aliens; verifies the
identities of aliens at a land border portof-entry; and authenticates travel
documents presented by such aliens
through the comparison of biometric
identifiers at a land border port-of-entry.
Aliens subject to US–VISIT may be
required to provide finger scans,
photographs, or other biometric
identifiers upon arrival in, or departure
from, the United States. DHS views US–
VISIT as a biometric driven program
designed to enhance the security of
United States citizens, permanent
residents, and visitors while expediting
legitimate travel and trade, ensure the
integrity of the immigration system, and
protect visitors’ personal information.
The statutes that authorize DHS to
establish US–VISIT include, but are not
limited to:
• Section 2(a) of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service Data
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Management Improvement Act of 2000,
Public Law 106–215, 114 Stat. 337 (June
15, 2000);
• Section 205 of the Visa Waiver
Permanent Program Act of 2000, Public
Law 106–396, 114 Stat. 1637, 1641 (Oct.
30, 2000);
• Section 414 of the Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required To
Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of
2001 (USA PATRIOT Act), Public Law
107–56, 115 Stat. 271, 353 (Oct. 26,
2001); and
• Section 302 of the Enhanced Border
Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of
2002 (Border Security Act) Public Law
107–173, 116 Stat. 543, 552 (May 14,
2002).
DHS provided detailed abstracts of the
particular sections of the statutes that
established and authorized the US–
VISIT program in two prior
rulemakings. See 69 FR 468 (Jan. 5,
2004); 69 FR 53318 (Aug. 31, 2004).
In addition, on December 17, 2004,
the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (IRPTA), Public
Law 108–458, sec. 7208, 118 Stat. 3638,
3817 (Dec. 17, 2004), specifically
addressed biometric entry and exit, and
subsection (c) calls for the Secretary to
accelerate the full implementation of the
US–VISIT program. The proof of
concept protocol described within this
Notice assists DHS in accelerating the
full implementation of US–VISIT.
II. Implementation of US–VISIT, Phases
One and Two
On January 5, 2004, DHS published
an interim rule in the Federal Register
establishing US–VISIT at air and sea
ports-of-entry designated by notice in
the Federal Register. See 69 FR 468.
Also on January 5, 2004, DHS published
a notice in the Federal Register, 69 FR
482, designating 115 airports and 14
seaports for the collection of biometric
data from certain nonimmigrant
travelers upon arrival to the United
States under the US–VISIT program.
Since January 5, 2004, travelers
applying for admission pursuant to a
nonimmigrant visa at designated air and
seaports have been required to submit
finger scans and photographs.
The January 5, 2004, interim rule also
provided for the Secretary to establish
pilot programs at up to fifteen air or sea
ports of entry, to be identified by notice
in the Federal Register, through which
DHS may require certain nonimmigrant
travelers who depart from a designated
air or sea port-of-entry to provide
specified biometric identifiers and other
evidence at the time of departure. See 8
CFR 215.8. On January 5, 2004, DHS
published a notice in the Federal
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2005 / Notices
Register, 69 FR 482, identifying the
implementation of exit pilot programs at
Baltimore-Washington International
Airport (BWI) and the Miami Seaport.
DHS has also implemented exit pilot
programs at an additional 13 ports of
departure, as identified by Notice in the
Federal Register on August 3, 2004. See
69 FR 46556.
On August 31, 2004, DHS regulations
were amended to implement the second
phase of US–VISIT by expanding the
program to the 50 most highly trafficked
land border ports-of-entry in the United
States as directed under section 110 of
the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996,
Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, sec. 110, 110
Stat. 3009–558 (Sept. 30, 1006), as
amended (8 U.S.C. 1365a(d)(2)). This
interim rule also expanded the
population of nonimmigrant aliens
subject to US–VISIT biometric data
collection. Biometric data collection at
the time of entry for those
nonimmigrants subject to US–VISIT was
implemented at the 50 most highly
trafficked United States land border
ports-of-entry by December 31, 2004,
and to nonimmigrants applying for
admission to the United States under
the provisions of the Visa Waiver
Program. The list of the 50 most highly
trafficked United States land border
ports-of-entry was published in a
Federal Register notice on November 9,
2004. See 69 FR 64964. This Notice also
advised the public that DHS planned,
via a future notice, to begin another
pilot program on biometric data
collection at the time of an alien’s exit
from the United States at select land
border port-of-entry crossings. As has
been noted in previously published
DHS interim rules, staggering the
implementation of US–VISIT, starting
with a few initial locations, will enable
DHS to test the system and identify
areas where the process for collection of
biometric information may be improved.
III. Automatic Identification at Exit and
Subsequent Re-entry at United States
Land Ports-of-Entry
A. Radio Frequency Identification
Technology
The interim rule of August 31, 2004
amended the DHS regulations, 8 CFR
215.8(a)(1), to allow for the
development of pilot programs that
document when a nonimmigrant
traveler exits from the United States at
a designated land border port-of-entry.
This Notice provides the public with
information on how DHS plans to test
exit and entry control through the use
of passive radio frequency identification
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Aug 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
(RFID) technology at five United States
land border locations.
RFID is a technology that is similar,
in theory, to bar code identification. In
both technologies, a tag is scanned to
retrieve an identifying number that is
used to find information contained in a
database. An RFID tag contains an
antenna and chip that stores data. The
tag receives and responds to radio
frequency queries from an RFID reader.
There are a number of different types of
RFID tags. Entirely passive tags use the
energy from the radio frequency query
to provide power to the chip on the tag
and to reflect the information stored on
the chip back to the reader. Because the
reader’s energy is used in this way there
is limited power available to store the
information and retrieve during a read.
Accordingly, the amount of information
stored is limited to an identifying
number. At the other end of the
spectrum, some active RFID tags can
affirmatively transmit radio signals
containing substantive information
contained in the tag to any reader that
has the capability of reading the tag.
Passive RFID tags do not have their
own power supply. In passive RFID
technology, the incoming radio
frequency provides all of the power for
the tag to send a response. The response
of a passive RFID tag is necessarily brief:
typically just a unique identification
number. Passive tags have limited read
ranges, reader power levels and local
factors. Based on these variables,
reliable reads can be received from a
few inches to as much as 30 feet away
from the reader. Longer reads are
impractical with passive tags.
In contrast, active RFID tags must
have a power source and have larger
memories than passive tags. An active
RFID tag may store a substantial amount
of substantive information that may be
transmitted to any reader with the
capability of reading the tag. Active tags
are used, for example, by many States to
automatically collect tolls on highways,
such as EZ-PASS, and these devices
generate an identifying signal to a
receiver at a toll plaza.
The RFID tags that will be tested by
US–VISIT under this Notice are passive
and will contain only the unique
identification number from the tag
embedded in the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) forms
which usually are issued by Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
agents to nonimmigrant aliens upon
entry into the United States. Upon
arrival into the United States at a land
border port-of-entry, a CBP agent will
provide a nonimmigrant traveler with a
USCIS Form I–94 (white), Arrival/
Departure Record, or Form I–94W
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44935
(green), Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver
Arrival/Departure Form. These forms
ask for basic identification information
and the address where the traveler will
stay while in the United States. The
Form I–94W is issued to nonimmigrant
travelers admitted to the United States
under the provisions of the Visa Waiver
Program.
The chip that will be imbedded in the
USCIS forms at identified land border
ports-of-entry participating in the test
will not contain any information about
the individual traveler. The chip will
contain only a unique identifier for the
specific Form I–94. This program will
test the optimal distance at which the
tag can be read during the traveler’s exit
and any subsequent re-entry and the
tag’s effectiveness and accuracy. For
example, when a traveler leaves the
United States from one of the identified
land border ports-of-entry, either on foot
or in a vehicle, the traveler’s tag will be
read and documented when the traveler
passes through a specially designed
gantry on which hang RFID antennas. If
this traveler has a multiple entry I–94
and subsequently applies for readmission, the RFID tag will be read as
the traveler approaches the port-ofentry, again either on foot or in a
vehicle. At that point, the US–VISIT
computer systems will call up the
associated information about the
traveler more quickly and that
information will be available when the
traveler presents the multiple-entry
Form I–94 before the inspecting officer.
As noted above, the Form I–94 chip will
contain no information about the
individual, other than a unique number
that has no meaning except to US–VISIT
computer systems that are being
operated by DHS.
DHS, through CBP, has utilized radio
frequency technology for many years in
several dedicated commuter lane
programs at United States land border
ports-of-entry—in particular the Secure
Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid
Inspection (SENTRI) program along the
southern border with Mexico and the
dedicated commuter lane system
(NEXUS) along the northern border with
Canada. This Notice does not eliminate
or replace any of the currently used
dedicated commuter lane programs at
United States land border ports-of-entry,
or programs designed to assist the flow
of international commercial cargo, such
as the Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE) program.
B. Radio Frequency Technology for
Automatic Identification
As noted above, DHS, through CBP,
has utilized RFID technology for many
years in several dedicated commuter
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
44936
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2005 / Notices
lane programs at United States land
border ports-of-entry. Taking this
concept one step further, DHS plans to
test the use of RFID technology to match
data gathered at the time of entry and
exit at certain proof of concept ports of
entry with a traveler’s biographic and/
or biometric information that was
collected when the traveler was initially
admitted to the United States at a proof
of concept land border port-of-entry and
issued Form I–94 or I–94W.
As noted above, DHS, through CBP,
has utilized RFID technology for many
years in several dedicated commuter
lane programs at United States land
border ports-of-entry. Taking this
concept one step further, DHS plans to
test using RFID technology in the
following way: matching the biographic
and/or biometric data collected when a
traveler is initially admitted to the
United States at a proof of concept land
border port-of-entry and issued Form I–
94 or I–94W with the data collected, by
way of RFID technology, at the time of
the traveler’s exit and if applicable reentry at a land border proof of concept
port-of-entry.
For this proof of concept, DHS plans
to embed an RFID tag into the paper
stock of the Form I–94 and plans to use
RFID passive tags. The tag will be
powered by the radio frequencies
transmitted by transceivers that will be
mounted at both vehicular and
pedestrian exit lanes at select land
border ports-of-entry. When travelers
either drive or walk through the port-ofentry to leave the United States, the
transceivers will send out a harmless
radio wave frequency that will power
the DHS-issued RFID tag to transmit
back a unique identifier code number.
This code number, when received by
the transceivers, will be relayed back to
secure DHS computer systems and
matched with the biographic and/or
biometric data of the traveler. DHS will
be able to automatically identify and
document the exits and, if applicable,
the subsequent re-entry of select
travelers at the United States land
border ports-of-entry identified in the
proof of concept protocol.
C. RFID-Embedded Form I–94 Issuance
and US–VISIT Enrollment Process
For purposes of automatic
identification, all nonimmigrant
travelers issued a Form I–94 or Form I–
94W at a proof of concept United States
land border port-of-entry will be issued
a Form I–94 or Form I–94W that has an
RFID tag embedded in the paper stock.
DHS will issue an RFID-embedded Form
I–94 to all applicable travelers because
such travelers are required under the
current US–VISIT program to comply
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Aug 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
with the biographic data collection
requirements of the admission and exit
process, regardless of whether the
traveler has had his or her biometrics
collected and thereby enrolled in the
US–VISIT program. This is an important
distinction. A traveler exempt from US–
VISIT enrollment is not screened using
biometrics, but is screened using
biographic information, including entry
and exit information, that is maintained
on the traveler in various DHS
databases. An automatic identification
tag embedded in the Form I–94 or Form
I–94W issued to a traveler exempt from
US–VISIT will not read back against any
biometric-driven database maintained
by DHS, but will ‘‘point’’ to the
biographic information within DHS
databases. Issuing automatic
identification tags to all nonimmigrant
travelers issued a Form I–94 or Form I–
94W at a proof of concept location is an
important part of the DHS
comprehensive approach to managing
our land borders because it will provide
DHS, for the first time, with information
that will accurately document the
traveler’s exit from the United States at
a land border port-of-entry.
DHS will continue to enroll into US–
VISIT at United States land border
ports-of-entry those travelers issued
Form I–94 or Form I–94W at the time of
admission and who are not otherwise
exempt from the biometric collection
requirements. Those travelers who are
otherwise exempt from US–VISIT
enrollment, even if issued a Form I–94
or Form I–94W at a land border port-ofentry, will continue to be exempt from
US–VISIT biometric enrollment. See 8
CFR 235.1(d)(1)(iv)(A)–(D)
(nonimmigrant aliens for which the
biometric enrollment requirements of
the US–VISIT program do not apply).
This means that Canadian citizens not
requiring a Form I–94 (the majority of
Canadians crossing the border at land
ports-of-entry) and Mexican citizens
admitted to the United States with a B–
1/B–2 Visa and Border Crossing Card
(BCC)—and whose intent is to abide by
the requirement that they exit within 30
days or less and the travel limitation of
staying within 25 miles of the border (75
miles within parts of the state of
Arizona)—will not be enrolled in US–
VISIT or be issued an automatic ID tag
at the time of admission. In addition,
travelers must note that the unique
automatic identification tag that will be
issued is not a replacement for either a
valid passport or valid nonimmigrant
visa if either of these documents is
required at the time of application for
admission to the United States.
Only those travelers issued Form I–94
or Form I–94W at United States land
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
border ports-of-entry proof of concept
locations will receive an automatic
identification tag and, unless otherwise
exempt, be enrolled in the US–VISIT
program. Since a nonimmigrant traveler
needing a Form I–94 at a land border
port-of-entry is directed to the CBP
secondary inspection area, CBP officers
will collect biometrics from these
travelers at the time of admission and
issue the traveler an RFID-embedded
Form I–94. At the time of issuance, the
RFID tag will be activated and the
unique code number embedded on the
tag will be automatically linked to the
traveler’s biographic and/or biometric
information that is stored in DHS
databases. This procedure should prove
to be only a modest change of the
current process for issuing Form I–94 or
Form I–94W for these select
nonimmigrant travelers. Nothing in this
Notice expands the classes of
nonimmigrant travelers who are
required issuance of a Form I–94 or
Form I–94W, and DHS is not increasing
the fee for Form I–94 or Form I–94W
issuance.
D. Using the RFID Tag at Exit and
Subsequent Admissions
After a CBP officer has issued an
RFID-enabled Form I–94 or Form I–
94W, travelers will need to keep the
document in their possession as they
would a regular Form I–94 (see section
264(e) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C.
1304(e)), and especially if they plan to
exit the United States from one of the
proof of concept ports-of-entry. When
exiting the United States at one of the
proof of concept ports-of-entry, the test
will examine if the RFID-enabled Form
I–94 can be read automatically,
regardless of whether the traveler is on
foot or in a vehicle. While initial testing
of the reading capabilities of the RFID
tags has shown a high read rate with
little to no action required by the
traveler, DHS will advise travelers of
any actions they may need to take in
order to guarantee that the RFID-enabled
Form I–94 is read automatically. For
example, it may be necessary for
persons traveling in a private vehicle to
place the Form I–94s on the seat next to
them while exiting the United States.
DHS will issue guidance and
instructions to all travelers issued an
automatic identification tag as part of
the Form I–94 issuance process, as well
conduct an educational campaign in the
border regions affected by the testing.
Travelers issued multiple entry Form
I–94s at United States land border proof
of concept ports-of-entry will be able to
use these documents at the time of a
subsequent application for re-entry into
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2005 / Notices
the United States. By reading the RFID
tag at the time of re-entry, the CBP
officer will be able to automatically
access the traveler’s previously
collected biographic and biometric
(unless exempt) information. In this
way, the pre-positioning of previously
collected information is similar to the
operation of the current CBP NEXUS
and SENTRI systems. DHS is testing
whether the ability to read the RFID tag
and call up the previously collected
information immediately prior to
presentation of the Form I–94 to the
CBP officer will improve processing
times for admission in primary
inspection.
DHS notes that exception scenarios
will be built into the proof of concept
process. It is inevitable that some
automatic identification tags will
become lost, damaged, or will simply
not work for whatever technical reason.
For example, some travelers, at the time
of exit, may be in possession of an
automatic identification tag issued to
another alien, such as a person
mistakenly having in his or her
possession the I–94 of their spouse.
Such situations will undoubtedly take
place and US–VISIT and CBP will build
into the standard operating procedures
processes that will address exception
scenarios such as those just described.
In order to improve the ability of DHS
to monitor overstays of authorized
periods of admission, DHS anticipates
that issuing to travelers RFID-enabled
Forms I–94 or Forms I–94W will permit
DHS to have the data associated with
the automatic identification tags
automatically checked against a number
of databases, including various lookout
systems. Such checks will be performed
automatically and remotely by way of
the automatic identification tag being
read at the time of exit or subsequent reentry (for those aliens with multiple
entry Form I–94 documents). Any noted
overstay of an authorized period of
admission detected by the automatic
identification capabilities at the time of
a traveler’s exit from the United States
will require the traveler to be processed
through secondary inspection for
questioning if the traveler makes a
subsequent application for admission.
E. Traveler Responsibilities
As DHS noted in the preamble to the
interim rule published in the Federal
Register on August 31, 2004, US–VISIT
continues to inform the public of their
responsibility to comply with all United
States entry and exit requirements. See
69 FR 53326. DHS and the Department
of State (DOS) will review all evidence
surrounding any prior travel to, and
departure from, the United States to
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Aug 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
determine whether a traveler has
complied with the terms of his or her
admission. At the time a traveler
subsequently applies for a visa or
admission, information from US–VISIT,
including departure information derived
from the proofs of concept outlined in
this Notice, will be one factor relied
upon by consular and CBP officers
when determining whether the traveler
complied with the terms of his or her
prior admission, and whether the
traveler should be granted a visa or be
admitted.
To that end, DHS reminds travelers of
their responsibility to maintain in their
personal possession any RFID-enabled
Form I–94 or Form I–94W while in and
when exiting the United States. See
section 264(e) of the Act, 8 U.S.C.
1304(e). Using a multiple entry RFIDenabled Form I–94 or Form I–94W when
applying for a subsequent admission at
a proof of concept United States land
border port-of-entry may facilitate
admission. See 8 CFR 235.1(f). Travelers
should also note that any willful
attempt to tamper with or deactivate an
automatic identification tag or to
willfully and knowingly engage in
practices such as, but not limited to,
transporting another traveler’s tag across
the United States border at a proof of
concept port-of-entry could render the
traveler inadmissible under the fraud
and misrepresentation provisions of
section 212(a)(6)(C) of the Act, 8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(6)(C), and liable for criminal
prosecution.
F. Impact on International Land Borders
DHS wishes to stress the importance
the Department is placing on
maintaining the free flow of individuals
and goods across our shared
international land borders. To not do so
would erase decades of work on
improving the flow of individuals and
goods between the United States,
Canada and Mexico. DHS intends to use
strategies for automated exit and reentry that will work to foster both a
safer and more secure border without
compromising our unique border
relationships with Canada and Mexico.
To this end, DHS, in partnership with
DOS, plans to work with the
governments of Canada and Mexico to
further refine the use of radio frequency
technology along the land borders and
to possibly explore alternative methods
for documenting the exits and entries of
individuals crossing the land borders
between our respective countries.
G. Public Privacy Interests
DHS fully realizes that individuals
may be concerned about the use of RFID
technology and personal privacy. Under
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44937
the DHS plan, no personal information
will be included or encoded on the
RFID tags that are embedded in the
Form I–94 and Form I–94W and issued
to travelers crossing the border. The
RFID tags will only contain an
embedded serial number that has no
intrinsic relationship to the individual
traveler. Only the DHS computers and
databases will be able to link the
embedded serial number to the
traveler’s biographic and biometric
information when activated at the time
of an exit or subsequent application for
admission to the United States. This
biographic and biometric information is
separately stored in secure databases
used by the US–VISIT and CBP
programs in order to determine
admissibility to the United States and
for other enforcement purposes. Even if
an individual has the capability to read
a tag using an unauthorized scanning
device, the only information gained
would be a meaningless series of digits,
not any biographic or biometric
information.
Another privacy-related issue is
whether the ability exists to track a
person’s movements within the United
States by way of the radio frequency tag
issued at the time of admission. It will
not be possible to track the whereabouts
of a person in the United States because
DHS is using non-battery powered
passive tags. The tags themselves can
only be activated by the radio wave
sensors used at one of the proof of
concept land ports-of-entry and within
the port of entry. Passive radio
frequency tags should not be confused
with Global Positioning System (GPS)
devices—including cellular phones with
GPS capability—that rely on different
technology than that used by radio
frequency devices. US–VISIT does not
use global positioning technology.
As discussed in the January 5 and
August 31, 2004 interim rules, US–
VISIT records will be protected
consistent with all applicable privacy
laws and regulations. Personal
information will be kept secure and
confidential and will not be discussed
with, nor disclosed to, any person
within or outside US–VISIT other than
as authorized by law and as required for
the performance of official duties. In
addition, careful safeguards, including
appropriate security controls, will
ensure that the data is not used or
accessed improperly. The Department’s
Chief Privacy Officer continues to
review pertinent aspects of the program
to ensure that proper safeguards and
security controls remain in place.
Personal information will be
protected in accordance with the DHS’
published privacy policy for US–VISIT.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
44938
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 149 / Thursday, August 4, 2005 / Notices
See 69 FR 2608 (Jan. 16, 2004)
(appended to privacy impact
assessment). US–VISIT has
implemented a process to facilitate the
amendment or correction by individuals
of data that are not accurate, relevant,
timely, or complete. The full US–VISIT
redress policy, including request form,
is available at https://www.dhs.gov/usvisit. The DHS Privacy Office continues
to exercise oversight of US–VISIT to
ensure that the information collected
and stored in IDENT and other systems
associated with US–VISIT is being
properly protected under the privacy
laws and guidance. US–VISIT also has
a program-dedicated Privacy Officer to
handle specific inquiries and to provide
additional oversight of the program. A
full Privacy Impact Assessment was
published in the Federal Register on
July 7, 2005, at 70 FR 39300.
Finally, DHS will continue to
maintain secure computer systems that
will ensure that the confidentiality of an
individual’s personal information is
maintained. In doing so, DHS and its
information technology personnel will
comply with all laws and regulations
applicable to government systems, such
as the Federal Information Security
Management Act of 2002, Title X, Public
Law 107–296, 116 Stat. 2259–2273
(November 25, 2002) (codified in
scattered sections of titles 6, 10, 15, 40,
and 44 U.S.C.); Information
Management Technology Reform Act
(Clinger-Cohen Act), 40 U.S.C. 11101 et
seq.); Computer Security Act of 1987, 40
U.S.C. 1441 et seq. (as amended);
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act, 44 U.S.C. 101, 3504; and Electronic
Freedom of Information Act of 1996, 5
U.S.C. 552.
Persons with further questions about
how the US–VISIT program is applying
the Privacy Act to enrollees may contact
the US–VISIT Privacy Officer, Mr. Steve
Yonkers, by the following means: by
mail—US–VISIT Privacy Officer, Border
and Transportation Security,
Department of Homeland Security, 245
Murray Lane, SW., Washington, DC
20538; by telephone at (202) 298–5200
(not a toll-free number); or by e-mail at
USVISITPRIVACY@dhs.gov.
H. Schedule and Locations of Proof of
Concept
DHS will begin issuing RFID
embedded Forms I–94 or Forms I–94W
on or around August 4, 2005, at the
following land border ports-of-entry
crossing locations: Pacific Highway,
Washington, Peace Arch, Washington,
Alexandria Bay, New York, Nogales
East, Arizona, Mariposa-Nogales West,
Arizona.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:23 Aug 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
As already noted, DHS will conduct
outreach in each of the above-noted
locations. This outreach will provide
those travelers issued an automatic
identification or RFID tag, and
especially those whose biometrics are
collected at any of the above noted
crossing locations, complete
information on the proof of concept
being conducted, on the RFID-enabled
Form I–94 or Form I–94W that will be
issued to travelers, and whether there
will be the need for travelers to take any
type of affirmative action to make sure
that the automatic identification tag is
read when the traveler next exits the
United States at a proof of concept
crossing location. This RFID test
program will continue for
approximately one year.
I. Proof of Concept Evaluation
DHS notes that none of the radio
frequency technology protocols outlined
in this preamble will be installed at the
busiest land border ports-of-entry until
the proof of concept programs are
implemented during the late summer
and fall of 2005 and evaluated for
accuracy and effectiveness. While DHS
has experience with using radio
frequency technology, the proof of
concept will be the first instance where
DHS is attempting to automatically
document the exits of select
nonimmigrant travelers at land border
ports-of-entry. DHS will also be working
with technical experts to determine if
any new technologies—technologies
other than those based on radio
frequency—are able to match or better
the results DHS expects to receive
during the proof of concept.
DHS anticipates that the automatic
identification proof of concept will
continue for approximately one year.
This time period will allow DHS to
concurrently analyze the results of the
proof of concept being conducted at the
above noted locations. Due to the
significant cost associated with
implementing exit control at all United
States land border port-of-entry
crossings, a full and comprehensive
analysis of the proof of concept testing
must be undertaken prior to any
nationwide installation of radio
frequency technology equipment. The
results of this analysis will be closely
examined to see if radio frequencybased technology does have the ability
to increase the efficiency and accuracy
of documenting the exit and any
subsequent reentry of travelers at land
border ports-of-entry. A staggered,
incremental installation approach is
consistent with the overall strategy of
the US–VISIT program.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Solicitation of Public Comment
As noted in previously published US–
VISIT rulemaking actions, DHS places a
great deal of importance on input from
the public on the performance and
implementation of the US–VISIT
program. While DHS is not under the
obligation to solicit public comments in
response to this Notice, DHS is
interested in whether the public has any
suggestions for automated methods to
document the exit of travelers from the
United States other than those identified
in this Notice. Accordingly, DHS is
soliciting comments from the public on
all aspects of the issues outlined in this
Notice.
The comment filing process will use
the standard procedure and instructions
for filing are included at the beginning
of this Notice. The comment period will
be open until October 3, 2005.
Dated: August 1, 2005.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05–15487 Filed 8–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of a Meeting of the Klamath
Fishery Management Council
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of meetings.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a
meeting of the Klamath Fishery
Management Council, established under
the authority of the Klamath River Basin
Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16
U.S.C. 460ss et seq.). The meeting is
open to the public. The Klamath Fishery
Management Council makes
recommendations to agencies that
regulate harvest of anadromous fish in
the Klamath River Basin. On the first
day of this meeting, the Klamath Fishery
Management Council will hear technical
reports and discuss Klamath River
salmon management. On the second
day, the Klamath Fishery Management
Council will join a meeting of the
Klamath River Basin Fisheries Task
Force to hear reports on the status of
fish health and habitat in the Klamath
River.
DATES: The meeting will be held from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. on October 18, 2005, and
9 a.m. to 12 p.m. on October 19, 2005.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 149 (Thursday, August 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44934-44938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15487]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
[DHS 2005-0011]
RIN 1650-AA01
United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology
Program; Notice on Automatic Identification of Certain Nonimmigrants
Exiting the United States at Select Land Border Ports-of-Entry
AGENCY: Border and Transportation Security Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security has established the United
States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program, an
integrated, automated entry-exit system that records the arrival and
departure of aliens; verifies aliens' identities; and authenticates
aliens' travel documents through comparison of biometric identifiers.
On August 31, 2004, the Department of Homeland Security implemented the
second phase of the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status
Indicator Technology Program by publishing an interim rule in the
Federal Register authorizing collection of biometric data from
travelers upon admission at the 50 most highly trafficked land border
ports-of-entry. This Notice informs the public of the further expansion
of the second phase of the program by establishing a limited testing or
proof of concept protocol for automatically documenting the exits and
any subsequent re-entries of nonimmigrant travelers at five United
States land border ports-of-entry crossings utilizing radio frequency
identification (RFID) technology. The purpose of this testing is to
determine if RFID technology can improve the efficiency of processing
individuals who seek to enter or exit the United States at a land
border port-of-entry. This program of testing will last approximately
one year.
DATES: Effective Dates: This Notice is effective August 4, 2005.
Written comments must be submitted on or before October 3, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DHS-2005-0011 to the
Docket Management Facility at the EPA. To avoid duplication, please use
only one of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at that Web site.
Mail: Written comments may be submitted to Craig Howie,
US-VISIT, Border and Transportation Security; Department of Homeland
Security; 1616 North Fort Myer Drive, 18th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209.
Submitted comments may be inspected at 1616 North Ft. Myer Drive,
Arlington, VA 22209 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday
except Federal holidays. Arrangements to inspect submitted comments
should be made in advance by calling (202) 298-5200. You may also find
this docket on the Internet at https://www.epa.gov/edocket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Craig Howie, Senior Regulatory
Analyst, US-VISIT, Border and Transportation Security, Department of
Homeland Security, 1616 Fort Myer Drive, 18th Floor, Arlington,
Virginia 22209, (202) 298-5200.
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1184, 1185, 1258, 1281, 1282, 1301-
1306, E.O. 13323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority for US-VISIT
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) established the United
States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program (US-
VISIT) in accordance with several statutory mandates that collectively
require DHS to create an integrated, automated entry and exit system
(entry-exit system) that records the arrival and departure of aliens;
verifies the identities of aliens at a land border port-of-entry; and
authenticates travel documents presented by such aliens through the
comparison of biometric identifiers at a land border port-of-entry.
Aliens subject to US-VISIT may be required to provide finger scans,
photographs, or other biometric identifiers upon arrival in, or
departure from, the United States. DHS views US-VISIT as a biometric
driven program designed to enhance the security of United States
citizens, permanent residents, and visitors while expediting legitimate
travel and trade, ensure the integrity of the immigration system, and
protect visitors' personal information.
The statutes that authorize DHS to establish US-VISIT include, but
are not limited to:
Section 2(a) of the Immigration and Naturalization Service
Data Management Improvement Act of 2000, Public Law 106-215, 114 Stat.
337 (June 15, 2000);
Section 205 of the Visa Waiver Permanent Program Act of
2000, Public Law 106-396, 114 Stat. 1637, 1641 (Oct. 30, 2000);
Section 414 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required To Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act), Public Law 107-56, 115 Stat.
271, 353 (Oct. 26, 2001); and
Section 302 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry
Reform Act of 2002 (Border Security Act) Public Law 107-173, 116 Stat.
543, 552 (May 14, 2002).
DHS provided detailed abstracts of the particular sections of the
statutes that established and authorized the US-VISIT program in two
prior rulemakings. See 69 FR 468 (Jan. 5, 2004); 69 FR 53318 (Aug. 31,
2004).
In addition, on December 17, 2004, the Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRPTA), Public Law 108-458, sec.
7208, 118 Stat. 3638, 3817 (Dec. 17, 2004), specifically addressed
biometric entry and exit, and subsection (c) calls for the Secretary to
accelerate the full implementation of the US-VISIT program. The proof
of concept protocol described within this Notice assists DHS in
accelerating the full implementation of US-VISIT.
II. Implementation of US-VISIT, Phases One and Two
On January 5, 2004, DHS published an interim rule in the Federal
Register establishing US-VISIT at air and sea ports-of-entry designated
by notice in the Federal Register. See 69 FR 468. Also on January 5,
2004, DHS published a notice in the Federal Register, 69 FR 482,
designating 115 airports and 14 seaports for the collection of
biometric data from certain nonimmigrant travelers upon arrival to the
United States under the US-VISIT program. Since January 5, 2004,
travelers applying for admission pursuant to a nonimmigrant visa at
designated air and seaports have been required to submit finger scans
and photographs.
The January 5, 2004, interim rule also provided for the Secretary
to establish pilot programs at up to fifteen air or sea ports of entry,
to be identified by notice in the Federal Register, through which DHS
may require certain nonimmigrant travelers who depart from a designated
air or sea port-of-entry to provide specified biometric identifiers and
other evidence at the time of departure. See 8 CFR 215.8. On January 5,
2004, DHS published a notice in the Federal
[[Page 44935]]
Register, 69 FR 482, identifying the implementation of exit pilot
programs at Baltimore-Washington International Airport (BWI) and the
Miami Seaport. DHS has also implemented exit pilot programs at an
additional 13 ports of departure, as identified by Notice in the
Federal Register on August 3, 2004. See 69 FR 46556.
On August 31, 2004, DHS regulations were amended to implement the
second phase of US-VISIT by expanding the program to the 50 most highly
trafficked land border ports-of-entry in the United States as directed
under section 110 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-208, div. C, sec. 110, 110
Stat. 3009-558 (Sept. 30, 1006), as amended (8 U.S.C. 1365a(d)(2)).
This interim rule also expanded the population of nonimmigrant aliens
subject to US-VISIT biometric data collection. Biometric data
collection at the time of entry for those nonimmigrants subject to US-
VISIT was implemented at the 50 most highly trafficked United States
land border ports-of-entry by December 31, 2004, and to nonimmigrants
applying for admission to the United States under the provisions of the
Visa Waiver Program. The list of the 50 most highly trafficked United
States land border ports-of-entry was published in a Federal Register
notice on November 9, 2004. See 69 FR 64964. This Notice also advised
the public that DHS planned, via a future notice, to begin another
pilot program on biometric data collection at the time of an alien's
exit from the United States at select land border port-of-entry
crossings. As has been noted in previously published DHS interim rules,
staggering the implementation of US-VISIT, starting with a few initial
locations, will enable DHS to test the system and identify areas where
the process for collection of biometric information may be improved.
III. Automatic Identification at Exit and Subsequent Re-entry at United
States Land Ports-of-Entry
A. Radio Frequency Identification Technology
The interim rule of August 31, 2004 amended the DHS regulations, 8
CFR 215.8(a)(1), to allow for the development of pilot programs that
document when a nonimmigrant traveler exits from the United States at a
designated land border port-of-entry. This Notice provides the public
with information on how DHS plans to test exit and entry control
through the use of passive radio frequency identification (RFID)
technology at five United States land border locations.
RFID is a technology that is similar, in theory, to bar code
identification. In both technologies, a tag is scanned to retrieve an
identifying number that is used to find information contained in a
database. An RFID tag contains an antenna and chip that stores data.
The tag receives and responds to radio frequency queries from an RFID
reader. There are a number of different types of RFID tags. Entirely
passive tags use the energy from the radio frequency query to provide
power to the chip on the tag and to reflect the information stored on
the chip back to the reader. Because the reader's energy is used in
this way there is limited power available to store the information and
retrieve during a read. Accordingly, the amount of information stored
is limited to an identifying number. At the other end of the spectrum,
some active RFID tags can affirmatively transmit radio signals
containing substantive information contained in the tag to any reader
that has the capability of reading the tag.
Passive RFID tags do not have their own power supply. In passive
RFID technology, the incoming radio frequency provides all of the power
for the tag to send a response. The response of a passive RFID tag is
necessarily brief: typically just a unique identification number.
Passive tags have limited read ranges, reader power levels and local
factors. Based on these variables, reliable reads can be received from
a few inches to as much as 30 feet away from the reader. Longer reads
are impractical with passive tags.
In contrast, active RFID tags must have a power source and have
larger memories than passive tags. An active RFID tag may store a
substantial amount of substantive information that may be transmitted
to any reader with the capability of reading the tag. Active tags are
used, for example, by many States to automatically collect tolls on
highways, such as EZ-PASS, and these devices generate an identifying
signal to a receiver at a toll plaza.
The RFID tags that will be tested by US-VISIT under this Notice are
passive and will contain only the unique identification number from the
tag embedded in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
forms which usually are issued by Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) agents to nonimmigrant aliens upon entry into the
United States. Upon arrival into the United States at a land border
port-of-entry, a CBP agent will provide a nonimmigrant traveler with a
USCIS Form I-94 (white), Arrival/Departure Record, or Form I-94W
(green), Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver Arrival/Departure Form. These forms
ask for basic identification information and the address where the
traveler will stay while in the United States. The Form I-94W is issued
to nonimmigrant travelers admitted to the United States under the
provisions of the Visa Waiver Program.
The chip that will be imbedded in the USCIS forms at identified
land border ports-of-entry participating in the test will not contain
any information about the individual traveler. The chip will contain
only a unique identifier for the specific Form I-94. This program will
test the optimal distance at which the tag can be read during the
traveler's exit and any subsequent re-entry and the tag's effectiveness
and accuracy. For example, when a traveler leaves the United States
from one of the identified land border ports-of-entry, either on foot
or in a vehicle, the traveler's tag will be read and documented when
the traveler passes through a specially designed gantry on which hang
RFID antennas. If this traveler has a multiple entry I-94 and
subsequently applies for re-admission, the RFID tag will be read as the
traveler approaches the port-of-entry, again either on foot or in a
vehicle. At that point, the US-VISIT computer systems will call up the
associated information about the traveler more quickly and that
information will be available when the traveler presents the multiple-
entry Form I-94 before the inspecting officer. As noted above, the Form
I-94 chip will contain no information about the individual, other than
a unique number that has no meaning except to US-VISIT computer systems
that are being operated by DHS.
DHS, through CBP, has utilized radio frequency technology for many
years in several dedicated commuter lane programs at United States land
border ports-of-entry--in particular the Secure Electronic Network for
Travelers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI) program along the southern border
with Mexico and the dedicated commuter lane system (NEXUS) along the
northern border with Canada. This Notice does not eliminate or replace
any of the currently used dedicated commuter lane programs at United
States land border ports-of-entry, or programs designed to assist the
flow of international commercial cargo, such as the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) program.
B. Radio Frequency Technology for Automatic Identification
As noted above, DHS, through CBP, has utilized RFID technology for
many years in several dedicated commuter
[[Page 44936]]
lane programs at United States land border ports-of-entry. Taking this
concept one step further, DHS plans to test the use of RFID technology
to match data gathered at the time of entry and exit at certain proof
of concept ports of entry with a traveler's biographic and/or biometric
information that was collected when the traveler was initially admitted
to the United States at a proof of concept land border port-of-entry
and issued Form I-94 or I-94W.
As noted above, DHS, through CBP, has utilized RFID technology for
many years in several dedicated commuter lane programs at United States
land border ports-of-entry. Taking this concept one step further, DHS
plans to test using RFID technology in the following way: matching the
biographic and/or biometric data collected when a traveler is initially
admitted to the United States at a proof of concept land border port-
of-entry and issued Form I-94 or I-94W with the data collected, by way
of RFID technology, at the time of the traveler's exit and if
applicable re-entry at a land border proof of concept port-of-entry.
For this proof of concept, DHS plans to embed an RFID tag into the
paper stock of the Form I-94 and plans to use RFID passive tags. The
tag will be powered by the radio frequencies transmitted by
transceivers that will be mounted at both vehicular and pedestrian exit
lanes at select land border ports-of-entry. When travelers either drive
or walk through the port-of-entry to leave the United States, the
transceivers will send out a harmless radio wave frequency that will
power the DHS-issued RFID tag to transmit back a unique identifier code
number. This code number, when received by the transceivers, will be
relayed back to secure DHS computer systems and matched with the
biographic and/or biometric data of the traveler. DHS will be able to
automatically identify and document the exits and, if applicable, the
subsequent re-entry of select travelers at the United States land
border ports-of-entry identified in the proof of concept protocol.
C. RFID-Embedded Form I-94 Issuance and US-VISIT Enrollment Process
For purposes of automatic identification, all nonimmigrant
travelers issued a Form I-94 or Form I-94W at a proof of concept United
States land border port-of-entry will be issued a Form I-94 or Form I-
94W that has an RFID tag embedded in the paper stock. DHS will issue an
RFID-embedded Form I-94 to all applicable travelers because such
travelers are required under the current US-VISIT program to comply
with the biographic data collection requirements of the admission and
exit process, regardless of whether the traveler has had his or her
biometrics collected and thereby enrolled in the US-VISIT program. This
is an important distinction. A traveler exempt from US-VISIT enrollment
is not screened using biometrics, but is screened using biographic
information, including entry and exit information, that is maintained
on the traveler in various DHS databases. An automatic identification
tag embedded in the Form I-94 or Form I-94W issued to a traveler exempt
from US-VISIT will not read back against any biometric-driven database
maintained by DHS, but will ``point'' to the biographic information
within DHS databases. Issuing automatic identification tags to all
nonimmigrant travelers issued a Form I-94 or Form I-94W at a proof of
concept location is an important part of the DHS comprehensive approach
to managing our land borders because it will provide DHS, for the first
time, with information that will accurately document the traveler's
exit from the United States at a land border port-of-entry.
DHS will continue to enroll into US-VISIT at United States land
border ports-of-entry those travelers issued Form I-94 or Form I-94W at
the time of admission and who are not otherwise exempt from the
biometric collection requirements. Those travelers who are otherwise
exempt from US-VISIT enrollment, even if issued a Form I-94 or Form I-
94W at a land border port-of-entry, will continue to be exempt from US-
VISIT biometric enrollment. See 8 CFR 235.1(d)(1)(iv)(A)-(D)
(nonimmigrant aliens for which the biometric enrollment requirements of
the US-VISIT program do not apply). This means that Canadian citizens
not requiring a Form I-94 (the majority of Canadians crossing the
border at land ports-of-entry) and Mexican citizens admitted to the
United States with a B-1/B-2 Visa and Border Crossing Card (BCC)--and
whose intent is to abide by the requirement that they exit within 30
days or less and the travel limitation of staying within 25 miles of
the border (75 miles within parts of the state of Arizona)--will not be
enrolled in US-VISIT or be issued an automatic ID tag at the time of
admission. In addition, travelers must note that the unique automatic
identification tag that will be issued is not a replacement for either
a valid passport or valid nonimmigrant visa if either of these
documents is required at the time of application for admission to the
United States.
Only those travelers issued Form I-94 or Form I-94W at United
States land border ports-of-entry proof of concept locations will
receive an automatic identification tag and, unless otherwise exempt,
be enrolled in the US-VISIT program. Since a nonimmigrant traveler
needing a Form I-94 at a land border port-of-entry is directed to the
CBP secondary inspection area, CBP officers will collect biometrics
from these travelers at the time of admission and issue the traveler an
RFID-embedded Form I-94. At the time of issuance, the RFID tag will be
activated and the unique code number embedded on the tag will be
automatically linked to the traveler's biographic and/or biometric
information that is stored in DHS databases. This procedure should
prove to be only a modest change of the current process for issuing
Form I-94 or Form I-94W for these select nonimmigrant travelers.
Nothing in this Notice expands the classes of nonimmigrant travelers
who are required issuance of a Form I-94 or Form I-94W, and DHS is not
increasing the fee for Form I-94 or Form I-94W issuance.
D. Using the RFID Tag at Exit and Subsequent Admissions
After a CBP officer has issued an RFID-enabled Form I-94 or Form I-
94W, travelers will need to keep the document in their possession as
they would a regular Form I-94 (see section 264(e) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 1304(e)), and especially if
they plan to exit the United States from one of the proof of concept
ports-of-entry. When exiting the United States at one of the proof of
concept ports-of-entry, the test will examine if the RFID-enabled Form
I-94 can be read automatically, regardless of whether the traveler is
on foot or in a vehicle. While initial testing of the reading
capabilities of the RFID tags has shown a high read rate with little to
no action required by the traveler, DHS will advise travelers of any
actions they may need to take in order to guarantee that the RFID-
enabled Form I-94 is read automatically. For example, it may be
necessary for persons traveling in a private vehicle to place the Form
I-94s on the seat next to them while exiting the United States. DHS
will issue guidance and instructions to all travelers issued an
automatic identification tag as part of the Form I-94 issuance process,
as well conduct an educational campaign in the border regions affected
by the testing.
Travelers issued multiple entry Form I-94s at United States land
border proof of concept ports-of-entry will be able to use these
documents at the time of a subsequent application for re-entry into
[[Page 44937]]
the United States. By reading the RFID tag at the time of re-entry, the
CBP officer will be able to automatically access the traveler's
previously collected biographic and biometric (unless exempt)
information. In this way, the pre-positioning of previously collected
information is similar to the operation of the current CBP NEXUS and
SENTRI systems. DHS is testing whether the ability to read the RFID tag
and call up the previously collected information immediately prior to
presentation of the Form I-94 to the CBP officer will improve
processing times for admission in primary inspection.
DHS notes that exception scenarios will be built into the proof of
concept process. It is inevitable that some automatic identification
tags will become lost, damaged, or will simply not work for whatever
technical reason. For example, some travelers, at the time of exit, may
be in possession of an automatic identification tag issued to another
alien, such as a person mistakenly having in his or her possession the
I-94 of their spouse. Such situations will undoubtedly take place and
US-VISIT and CBP will build into the standard operating procedures
processes that will address exception scenarios such as those just
described.
In order to improve the ability of DHS to monitor overstays of
authorized periods of admission, DHS anticipates that issuing to
travelers RFID-enabled Forms I-94 or Forms I-94W will permit DHS to
have the data associated with the automatic identification tags
automatically checked against a number of databases, including various
lookout systems. Such checks will be performed automatically and
remotely by way of the automatic identification tag being read at the
time of exit or subsequent re-entry (for those aliens with multiple
entry Form I-94 documents). Any noted overstay of an authorized period
of admission detected by the automatic identification capabilities at
the time of a traveler's exit from the United States will require the
traveler to be processed through secondary inspection for questioning
if the traveler makes a subsequent application for admission.
E. Traveler Responsibilities
As DHS noted in the preamble to the interim rule published in the
Federal Register on August 31, 2004, US-VISIT continues to inform the
public of their responsibility to comply with all United States entry
and exit requirements. See 69 FR 53326. DHS and the Department of State
(DOS) will review all evidence surrounding any prior travel to, and
departure from, the United States to determine whether a traveler has
complied with the terms of his or her admission. At the time a traveler
subsequently applies for a visa or admission, information from US-
VISIT, including departure information derived from the proofs of
concept outlined in this Notice, will be one factor relied upon by
consular and CBP officers when determining whether the traveler
complied with the terms of his or her prior admission, and whether the
traveler should be granted a visa or be admitted.
To that end, DHS reminds travelers of their responsibility to
maintain in their personal possession any RFID-enabled Form I-94 or
Form I-94W while in and when exiting the United States. See section
264(e) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1304(e). Using a multiple entry RFID-
enabled Form I-94 or Form I-94W when applying for a subsequent
admission at a proof of concept United States land border port-of-entry
may facilitate admission. See 8 CFR 235.1(f). Travelers should also
note that any willful attempt to tamper with or deactivate an automatic
identification tag or to willfully and knowingly engage in practices
such as, but not limited to, transporting another traveler's tag across
the United States border at a proof of concept port-of-entry could
render the traveler inadmissible under the fraud and misrepresentation
provisions of section 212(a)(6)(C) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(C),
and liable for criminal prosecution.
F. Impact on International Land Borders
DHS wishes to stress the importance the Department is placing on
maintaining the free flow of individuals and goods across our shared
international land borders. To not do so would erase decades of work on
improving the flow of individuals and goods between the United States,
Canada and Mexico. DHS intends to use strategies for automated exit and
re-entry that will work to foster both a safer and more secure border
without compromising our unique border relationships with Canada and
Mexico. To this end, DHS, in partnership with DOS, plans to work with
the governments of Canada and Mexico to further refine the use of radio
frequency technology along the land borders and to possibly explore
alternative methods for documenting the exits and entries of
individuals crossing the land borders between our respective countries.
G. Public Privacy Interests
DHS fully realizes that individuals may be concerned about the use
of RFID technology and personal privacy. Under the DHS plan, no
personal information will be included or encoded on the RFID tags that
are embedded in the Form I-94 and Form I-94W and issued to travelers
crossing the border. The RFID tags will only contain an embedded serial
number that has no intrinsic relationship to the individual traveler.
Only the DHS computers and databases will be able to link the embedded
serial number to the traveler's biographic and biometric information
when activated at the time of an exit or subsequent application for
admission to the United States. This biographic and biometric
information is separately stored in secure databases used by the US-
VISIT and CBP programs in order to determine admissibility to the
United States and for other enforcement purposes. Even if an individual
has the capability to read a tag using an unauthorized scanning device,
the only information gained would be a meaningless series of digits,
not any biographic or biometric information.
Another privacy-related issue is whether the ability exists to
track a person's movements within the United States by way of the radio
frequency tag issued at the time of admission. It will not be possible
to track the whereabouts of a person in the United States because DHS
is using non-battery powered passive tags. The tags themselves can only
be activated by the radio wave sensors used at one of the proof of
concept land ports-of-entry and within the port of entry. Passive radio
frequency tags should not be confused with Global Positioning System
(GPS) devices--including cellular phones with GPS capability--that rely
on different technology than that used by radio frequency devices. US-
VISIT does not use global positioning technology.
As discussed in the January 5 and August 31, 2004 interim rules,
US-VISIT records will be protected consistent with all applicable
privacy laws and regulations. Personal information will be kept secure
and confidential and will not be discussed with, nor disclosed to, any
person within or outside US-VISIT other than as authorized by law and
as required for the performance of official duties. In addition,
careful safeguards, including appropriate security controls, will
ensure that the data is not used or accessed improperly. The
Department's Chief Privacy Officer continues to review pertinent
aspects of the program to ensure that proper safeguards and security
controls remain in place.
Personal information will be protected in accordance with the DHS'
published privacy policy for US-VISIT.
[[Page 44938]]
See 69 FR 2608 (Jan. 16, 2004) (appended to privacy impact assessment).
US-VISIT has implemented a process to facilitate the amendment or
correction by individuals of data that are not accurate, relevant,
timely, or complete. The full US-VISIT redress policy, including
request form, is available at https://www.dhs.gov/us-visit. The DHS
Privacy Office continues to exercise oversight of US-VISIT to ensure
that the information collected and stored in IDENT and other systems
associated with US-VISIT is being properly protected under the privacy
laws and guidance. US-VISIT also has a program-dedicated Privacy
Officer to handle specific inquiries and to provide additional
oversight of the program. A full Privacy Impact Assessment was
published in the Federal Register on July 7, 2005, at 70 FR 39300.
Finally, DHS will continue to maintain secure computer systems that
will ensure that the confidentiality of an individual's personal
information is maintained. In doing so, DHS and its information
technology personnel will comply with all laws and regulations
applicable to government systems, such as the Federal Information
Security Management Act of 2002, Title X, Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat.
2259-2273 (November 25, 2002) (codified in scattered sections of titles
6, 10, 15, 40, and 44 U.S.C.); Information Management Technology Reform
Act (Clinger-Cohen Act), 40 U.S.C. 11101 et seq.); Computer Security
Act of 1987, 40 U.S.C. 1441 et seq. (as amended); Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, 44 U.S.C. 101, 3504; and Electronic Freedom of
Information Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 552.
Persons with further questions about how the US-VISIT program is
applying the Privacy Act to enrollees may contact the US-VISIT Privacy
Officer, Mr. Steve Yonkers, by the following means: by mail--US-VISIT
Privacy Officer, Border and Transportation Security, Department of
Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane, SW., Washington, DC 20538; by
telephone at (202) 298-5200 (not a toll-free number); or by e-mail at
USVISITPRIVACY@dhs.gov.
H. Schedule and Locations of Proof of Concept
DHS will begin issuing RFID embedded Forms I-94 or Forms I-94W on
or around August 4, 2005, at the following land border ports-of-entry
crossing locations: Pacific Highway, Washington, Peace Arch,
Washington, Alexandria Bay, New York, Nogales East, Arizona, Mariposa-
Nogales West, Arizona.
As already noted, DHS will conduct outreach in each of the above-
noted locations. This outreach will provide those travelers issued an
automatic identification or RFID tag, and especially those whose
biometrics are collected at any of the above noted crossing locations,
complete information on the proof of concept being conducted, on the
RFID-enabled Form I-94 or Form I-94W that will be issued to travelers,
and whether there will be the need for travelers to take any type of
affirmative action to make sure that the automatic identification tag
is read when the traveler next exits the United States at a proof of
concept crossing location. This RFID test program will continue for
approximately one year.
I. Proof of Concept Evaluation
DHS notes that none of the radio frequency technology protocols
outlined in this preamble will be installed at the busiest land border
ports-of-entry until the proof of concept programs are implemented
during the late summer and fall of 2005 and evaluated for accuracy and
effectiveness. While DHS has experience with using radio frequency
technology, the proof of concept will be the first instance where DHS
is attempting to automatically document the exits of select
nonimmigrant travelers at land border ports-of-entry. DHS will also be
working with technical experts to determine if any new technologies--
technologies other than those based on radio frequency--are able to
match or better the results DHS expects to receive during the proof of
concept.
DHS anticipates that the automatic identification proof of concept
will continue for approximately one year. This time period will allow
DHS to concurrently analyze the results of the proof of concept being
conducted at the above noted locations. Due to the significant cost
associated with implementing exit control at all United States land
border port-of-entry crossings, a full and comprehensive analysis of
the proof of concept testing must be undertaken prior to any nationwide
installation of radio frequency technology equipment. The results of
this analysis will be closely examined to see if radio frequency-based
technology does have the ability to increase the efficiency and
accuracy of documenting the exit and any subsequent reentry of
travelers at land border ports-of-entry. A staggered, incremental
installation approach is consistent with the overall strategy of the
US-VISIT program.
IV. Solicitation of Public Comment
As noted in previously published US-VISIT rulemaking actions, DHS
places a great deal of importance on input from the public on the
performance and implementation of the US-VISIT program. While DHS is
not under the obligation to solicit public comments in response to this
Notice, DHS is interested in whether the public has any suggestions for
automated methods to document the exit of travelers from the United
States other than those identified in this Notice. Accordingly, DHS is
soliciting comments from the public on all aspects of the issues
outlined in this Notice.
The comment filing process will use the standard procedure and
instructions for filing are included at the beginning of this Notice.
The comment period will be open until October 3, 2005.
Dated: August 1, 2005.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-15487 Filed 8-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P