Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice Dismissing Complaint, 44609-44610 [E5-4165]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 3, 2005 / Notices
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–15396 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RP05–518–000]
North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of
Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tairff
July 29, 2005.
Take notice that on July 26, 2005,
North Baja Pipeline, LLC (NBP)
tendered for filing as part of its FERC
Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the
following tariff sheets, to become
effective July 27, 2005:
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4183 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 6,
Second Revised Sheet No. 8,
Original Sheet No. 8A,
Original Sheet No. 8B.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
NBP states that these tariff sheets are
being submitted to add language to two
explanatory footnotes for negotiated
rates under Rate Schedule FTS–1.
NBP further states that a copy of this
filing has been served on NBP’s
jurisdictional customers and interested
state regulatory agencies.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed in accordance
with the provisions of Section 154.210
of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR
154.210). Anyone filing an intervention
or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone
filing an intervention or protest on or
before the intervention or protest date
need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
[Docket No. EL05–126–000]
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:22 Aug 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority
v. American Electric Power Service
Corporation; Notice of Institution of
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date
July 26, 2005.
On July 26, 2005, the Commission
issued an order that instituted a
proceeding in Docket No. EL05–126–
000, pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C.
824e, concerning the continued justness
and reasonableness of American Electric
Power Services Corporation’s Network
Integration Transmission Service
Agreement with the Oklahoma
Municipal Power Authority. Oklahoma
Municipal Power Authority v. American
Electric Power Service Corp., 112 FERC
¶ 61,107 (2005).
The refund effective date in Docket
No. EL05–126–000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA,
will be 60 days from the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4156 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44609
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 1962–113]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Notice Dismissing Complaint
July 25, 2005.
1. On May 31, 2005, the Anglers
Committee (Anglers) filed a complaint
against Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E), licensee for the Rock
Creek-Cresta Project No. 1962, located
on the North Fork Feather River in Butte
and Plumas Counties, California.1 On
June 21, 2005, PG&E filed an answer to
the complaint. On July 13, 2005,
Anglers filed a rebuttal to PG&E’s
answer.
2. The Anglers contend that the
Ecological Resource Committee
(Committee), created by the licensee,2
will not allow the public to participate
in the meetings (other than to attend
and listen) and to have access to
Committee documents. The Anglers
request that the Commission require
PG&E to establish requirements and
proceedings for Committee meetings to
provide public participation in all
matters and access to Committee
documents.
3. The Commission’s regulations
provide that a complaint may be filed
seeking Commission action against any
person alleged to be ‘‘in contravention
or violation of any statute, rule, order,
or other law administered by the
Commission or for any other alleged
wrong over which the Commission may
have jurisdiction.’’ 3 The regulations
further provide that the complaint must
[c]learly identify the action or inaction
which is alleged to violate applicable
statutory standards or regulatory
requirements.’’ 4
1 The Commission issued PG&E a new license for
the Rock Creek-Cresta Project and approved a
settlement agreement resolving various projectrelated issues on October 24, 2001. 97 FERC
¶ 61,084 (2001).
2 Appendix Condition No. 22 of the license
required PG&E to establish the Committee in
coordination with the parties to the Settlement
Agreement for the purpose of assisting the licensee
in the design of monitoring plans, review and
evaluation of data, and preparation of adaptive
management measures for implementation by the
licensee as provided in the Settlement Agreement.
The Anglers previously participated in settlement
discussions regarding the relicensing of the project
but, as stated in their complaint, they chose not to
become signatories to the Settlement Agreement
because of their disagreement with certain terms
and conditions in the agreement. Members of the
Committee are limited to the Settlement Agreement
signatories.
3 See 18 CFR 385.206(a)(2005).
4 Id.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
44610
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 3, 2005 / Notices
4. The license does not establish
Committee procedures. Nor does it
require public participation in
Committee matters.5 Since the
complainants do not allege that PG&E is
in violation of its license, the Federal
Power Act, or the Commission’s
regulations, the complaint is dismissed.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4165 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 2630]
PacifiCorp; Notice of Authorization for
Continued Project Operation
July 7, 2005.
On June 27, 2003, PacifiCorp, licensee
for the Prospect Nos. 1, 2, and 4 Project
No. 2630, filed an application for a new
or subsequent license pursuant to the
Federal Power Act (FPA) and the
Commission’s regulations. Project No.
2630 is located on the Rogue River,
Middle Fork Rogue River, and Red
Blanket Creek in Jackson County,
Oregon.
The license for Project No. 2630 was
issued for a period ending July 1, 2005.
Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C.
808(a)(1), requires the Commission, at
the expiration of a license term, to issue
from year to year an annual license to
the then licensee under the terms and
conditions of the prior license until a
new license is issued, or the project is
otherwise disposed of as provided in
section 15 or any other applicable
section of the FPA. If the project’s prior
license waived the applicability of
section 15 of the FPA, then, based on
section 9(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as
set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the
licensee of such project has filed an
application for a subsequent license, the
licensee may continue to operate the
project in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the license after the
minor or minor part license expires,
until the Commission acts on its
application. If the licensee of such a
project has not filed an application for
a subsequent license, then it may be
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b),
to continue project operations until the
5 However, any material changes in project
operations during the term of the license will
require a license amendment application, public
notice, and a proceeding in which interested
entities will have an opportunity to participate.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:22 Aug 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
Commission issues someone else a
license for the project or otherwise
orders disposition of the project.
If the project is subject to section 15
of the FPA, notice is hereby given that
an annual license for Project No. 2630
is issued to PacifiCorp for a period
effective July 2, 2005 through July 1,
2006, or until the issuance of a new
license for the project or other
disposition under the FPA, whichever
comes first. If issuance of a new license
(or other disposition) does not take
place on or before July 2, 2006, notice
is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR
16.18(c), an annual license under
section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed
automatically without further order or
notice by the Commission, unless the
Commission orders otherwise.
If the project is not subject to section
15 of the FPA, notice is hereby given
that PacifiCorp is authorized to continue
operation of the Prospect Nos. 1, 2, and
4 Project No. 2630 until such time as the
Commission acts on its application for
subsequent license.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–15393 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–U
or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone
filing an intervention or protest on or
before the intervention or protest date
need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4180 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
[Docket No. RP05–516–000]
Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC;
Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC
Gas Tariff
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
July 29, 2005.
Take notice that on July 22, 2005,
Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC (Pine
Needle) tendered for filing as part of its
FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1,
Third Revised Sheet No. 81 and First
Revised Sheet No. 82, to become
effective August 22, 2005.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed in accordance
with the provisions of Section 154.210
of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR
154.210). Anyone filing an intervention
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. EL05–127–000]
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of
Institution of Proceeding and Refund
Effective Date
July 7, 2005.
On July 6, 2005, the Commission
issued an order that instituted a
proceeding in Docket No. EL05–127–
000, pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C.
824e, concerning the continued justness
and reasonableness of PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.’s previouslyaccepted rate filing with respect to the
behind-the-meter generation netting
program. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.,
112 FERC ¶ 61,034 (2005).
The refund effective date in Docket
No. EL05–127–000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA,
will be 60 days from the date of
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44609-44610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4165]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1962-113]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice Dismissing Complaint
July 25, 2005.
1. On May 31, 2005, the Anglers Committee (Anglers) filed a
complaint against Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), licensee for
the Rock Creek-Cresta Project No. 1962, located on the North Fork
Feather River in Butte and Plumas Counties, California.\1\ On June 21,
2005, PG&E filed an answer to the complaint. On July 13, 2005, Anglers
filed a rebuttal to PG&E's answer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Commission issued PG&E a new license for the Rock Creek-
Cresta Project and approved a settlement agreement resolving various
project-related issues on October 24, 2001. 97 FERC ] 61,084 (2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The Anglers contend that the Ecological Resource Committee
(Committee), created by the licensee,\2\ will not allow the public to
participate in the meetings (other than to attend and listen) and to
have access to Committee documents. The Anglers request that the
Commission require PG&E to establish requirements and proceedings for
Committee meetings to provide public participation in all matters and
access to Committee documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Appendix Condition No. 22 of the license required PG&E to
establish the Committee in coordination with the parties to the
Settlement Agreement for the purpose of assisting the licensee in
the design of monitoring plans, review and evaluation of data, and
preparation of adaptive management measures for implementation by
the licensee as provided in the Settlement Agreement.
The Anglers previously participated in settlement discussions
regarding the relicensing of the project but, as stated in their
complaint, they chose not to become signatories to the Settlement
Agreement because of their disagreement with certain terms and
conditions in the agreement. Members of the Committee are limited to
the Settlement Agreement signatories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The Commission's regulations provide that a complaint may be
filed seeking Commission action against any person alleged to be ``in
contravention or violation of any statute, rule, order, or other law
administered by the Commission or for any other alleged wrong over
which the Commission may have jurisdiction.'' \3\ The regulations
further provide that the complaint must [c]learly identify the action
or inaction which is alleged to violate applicable statutory standards
or regulatory requirements.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 18 CFR 385.206(a)(2005).
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 44610]]
4. The license does not establish Committee procedures. Nor does it
require public participation in Committee matters.\5\ Since the
complainants do not allege that PG&E is in violation of its license,
the Federal Power Act, or the Commission's regulations, the complaint
is dismissed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ However, any material changes in project operations during
the term of the license will require a license amendment
application, public notice, and a proceeding in which interested
entities will have an opportunity to participate.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-4165 Filed 8-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
