National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 44063-44066 [05-15151]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 146 / Monday, August 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.2320
Identification of plan.
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 30,
2005. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(60) Revisions to the Utah State
Implementation Plan, Section IX, Part
C.7, ‘‘Carbon Monoxide Maintenance
Provisions for Salt Lake City,’’ as
submitted by the Governor on October
19, 2004; revisions to UACR R307–110–
12, ‘‘Section IX, Control Measures for
Area and Point Sources, Part C, Carbon
Monoxide,’’ as submitted by the
Governor on October 19, 2004; revisions
to the Utah State Implementation Plan,
Section X, ‘‘Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance Program, Part C, Salt Lake
County,’’ as submitted by the Governor
on October 19, 2004; and revisions to
UACR R307–110–33, ‘‘Section X,
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
Program, Part C, Salt Lake County,’’ as
submitted by the Governor on October
19, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) UACR R307–110–12, as adopted
by the Utah Air Quality Board on
October 6, 2004, effective December 2,
2004. This incorporation by reference of
UACR R307–110–12 only extends to the
following Utah SIP provisions and
excludes any other provisions that
UACR R307–110–12 incorporates by
reference: Section IX, Part C.7, ‘‘Carbon
Monoxide Maintenance Provisions for
Salt Lake City,’’ adopted by Utah Air
Quality Board on October 6, 2004,
effective December 2, 2004.
(B) UACR R307–110–33, ‘‘Section X,
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
Program, Part C, Salt Lake County,’’ as
adopted by the Utah Air Quality Board
on October 6, 2004, effective October 7,
2004.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 8, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
*
[FR Doc. 05–15150 Filed 7–29–05; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–7947–1]
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
I
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final notice of deletion of
the Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump
Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
AGENCY:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart TT—Utah
2. Section 52.2320 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(60) to read as
follows:
I
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:24 Jul 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region III is publishing a
direct final notice of deletion of the
Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump Superfund
Site (Site), located near Winchester
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44063
(Frederick County), Virginia, from the
National Priorities List (NPL).
The NPL, promulgated pursuant to
section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980, as amended (CERCLA), is
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). This direct final notice of
deletion is being published by EPA with
the concurrence of the Commonwealth
of Virginia, through the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality
(VDEQ), because EPA has determined
that all appropriate response actions
under CERCLA have been completed
and, therefore, further remedial action
pursuant to CERCLA is not appropriate.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be
effective September 30, 2005, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
August 31, 2005. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
to: Andrew Palestini, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. EPA Region III (3HS23),
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19103–2029, Palestini.andy@epa.gov,
(215) 814–3233.
Information Repositories:
Comprehensive information about the
Site is available for viewing and copying
at the site information repositories
located at: U.S. EPA Region III, Regional
Center for Environmental Information
(RCEI), 1650 Arch Street (2nd Floor),
Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029, (215)
814–5254, Monday through Friday, 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.; and, in Virginia, at the
Handley Library, 100 West Piccadilly
Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)
662–9041 ext. 23. Hours of operation
are: Monday through Wednesday, 10
a.m. to 8 p.m. and Thursday through
Saturday, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Palestini, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. EPA Region III (3HS23),
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19103–2029, Palestini.andy@epa.gov,
(215) 814–3233 or 1–800–553–2509.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region III is publishing this
direct final notice of deletion of the
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44064
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 146 / Monday, August 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump Superfund
Site from the NPL.
The EPA identifies sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public
health or the environment and
maintains the NPL as the list of those
sites. As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for remedial actions if
conditions at a deleted site warrant such
action.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication of a
notice of intent to delete. This action
will be effective September 30, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by August 31, 2005, on this notice or the
parallel notice of intent to delete
published in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register. If
adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period on
this notice or the notice of intent to
delete, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of this direct final notice of
deletion before the effective date of the
deletion and the deletion will not take
effect. EPA will, as appropriate, prepare
a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will
be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the Rhinehart Tire Fire
Dump Superfund Site and demonstrates
how it meets the deletion criteria.
Section V discusses EPA’s action to
delete the Site from the NPL unless
adverse comments are received during
the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP
provides that releases may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response
is appropriate. In making a
determination to delete a Site from the
NPL, EPA shall consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
(Hazardous Substance Superfund
Response Trust Fund) response under
CERCLA has been implemented, and no
further response action by responsible
parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:24 Jul 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL,
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at the deleted
site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure, CERCLA § 121(c), 42 U.S.C.
9621(c), requires that a subsequent
review of the site be conducted at least
every five years after the initiation of the
remedial action at the deleted site to
ensure that the action remains
protective of public health and the
environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a
need for further action, EPA may initiate
remedial actions. Whenever there is a
significant release from a site deleted
from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application
of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the
Commonwealth of Virginia on the
deletion of the Site from the NPL prior
to developing this direct final notice of
deletion.
(2) The Commonwealth of Virginia
has concurred with deletion of the Site
from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication
of this direct final notice of deletion, a
notice of the availability of the parallel
notice of intent to delete published
today in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section
of the Federal Register is being
published in a major local newspaper of
general circulation at or near the Site
and is being distributed to appropriate
federal, state, and local government
officials and other interested parties; the
newspaper notice announces the 30-day
public comment period concerning the
notice of intent to delete the Site from
the NPL.
(4) EPA placed copies of documents
supporting the deletion in the Site
information repositories identified
above.
(5) If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this notice or the companion
notice of intent to delete also published
in today’s Federal Register, EPA will
publish a timely notice of withdrawal of
this direct final notice of deletion before
its effective date. EPA will, as
appropriate, prepare a response to
comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does
not itself create, alter, or revoke any
individual’s rights or obligations.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
in any way alter EPA’s right to take
enforcement actions, as appropriate.
The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist
EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3)
of the NCP states that the deletion of a
site from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the Site
from the NPL:
Site History and Characteristics
Land and Resource Use
The Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump Site is
approximately 10 acres in size and is
located on a much larger residential
parcel of land located in a sparsely
populated rural area in western
Frederick County, Virginia
approximately six miles west of
Winchester. The upland portion of the
Site, where most of the Superfund
response work took place, is
approximately 5 acres in size. Title of
the property which constitutes the Site,
as well as the remaining portion of the
Rhinehart Farm, is part of the Rhinehart
estate. The Site includes the head
waters of Massey Run which flows into
Hogue Creek and then into the Potomac
River.
History of Contamination/Response
Actions
Between 1972 and 1983, the operator
(also the site owner) used the ravine
behind his home as a tire storage area.
During the course of his business, it is
estimated that as many as twenty-five
million tires were handled by the
operator. Most of the tires were sold for
re-tread and others for dock linings, etc.
The remainder were stored in the
ravine.
On October 31, 1983, a fire broke out
in the tire storage area, and engulfed an
estimated 5 to 7 million tires that were
being stored at the site at that time. Due
to the magnitude of the fire, state
officials requested assistance from EPA.
The fire was brought under control
within a few days, but continued to
smolder for six months. An
investigation revealed that the fire was
caused by an arsonist.
The burning of the tires caused a
release of contaminants and the melting
and pyrolysis of the tires produced a hot
oily substance. Chemically, the oily tar
contained benzene, ethylbenzene,
toluene, anthracene, naphthalene,
pyrene, cadmium, chromium, nickel,
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 146 / Monday, August 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and zinc. The fire posed an imminent
and substantial threat to human health
and the environment through the release
of airborne contaminants, the release of
hazardous substances to Massey Run,
Hogue Creek, and the Potomac River, as
well as the fire threat to the surrounding
forest.
Initially, EPA constructed a catch
basin to trap the free-flowing oily
substance as it began to seep out of the
edge of the tire pile and into Massey
Run. However, because of a higher than
estimated flow rate, a second pond (later
named Dutchman’s Pond) was
constructed down-slope from the burn
area. Dutchman’s Pond was constructed
as a lined, 50,000 gallon pond in midNovember 1983. Approximately 800,000
gallons of oil product were eventually
collected, removed from the site, and
recycled as fuel oil.
To address the long-term cleanup, the
site was placed on the National
Priorities List (NPL) on June 10, 1986.
EPA split the remedial activities into
three operable units. The purpose of
Operable Unit 1 (OU–1) was to control
the off-site migration of contaminants
and to re-stabilize the area. The purpose
of OU–2 was to decommission
Dutchman’s Pond. The purpose of OU–
3 was to address site-wide
contamination.
Aquatic toxicity was identified in the
OU–1 Remedial Investigation as the
principal environmental concern at the
site. Contaminated runoff from the site
was found to be the main contributor to
the chronic and acute toxicity observed
in surface water samples taken from
locations downstream of the site. Zinc,
detected at levels exceeding the ambient
water quality, was thought to be the
primary contributor of risk to aquatic
life. EPA selected an interim remedy in
the OU–1 Record of Decision (ROD)
dated June 30, 1988, with the Remedial
Action Objective (RAO) of reducing or
eliminating the continued migration of
contaminants off-site. The slopes were
stabilized by covering them with
shotcrete (a concrete-like substance) and
storm sewers were constructed to
transport the collected surface water to
Rhinehart’s Pond. The dam at the pond
was raised ten feet to enable gravity
settling of the collected water. A water
treatment plant was installed when it
was determined that gravity settling
alone would not meet the effluent
standards set by the Virginia Water
Control Board.
The RAO for OU–2 was to eliminate
the immediate threat of release of
contaminants from Dutchman’s Pond to
Massey Run. Dutchman’s Pond posed an
imminent threat to the aquatic life in
Massey Run because only six inches of
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:24 Jul 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
freeboard remained. Samples taken from
the pond verified surface water and
sediment contamination; Again, zinc
was the primary contributor of aquatic
risk. The remedy selected for OU–2, in
the September 29, 1992 ROD, was clean
closure of Dutchman’s Pond, including:
transporting the surface water to
Rhinehart’s Pond for eventual treatment;
solidification of the sediment; and, offsite disposal of the solidified sediment,
pond liner, and the soil surrounding the
pond which exceeded 50 mg/kg zinc.
Because the previous operable units
focused on the immediate threats posed
by the contamination at the site, EPA
evaluated long-term threats as part of
OU–3. The OU–3 Remedial
Investigation consisted of site-wide
sampling to characterize and identify
potential ground water, soil, surface
water, and sediment contamination
from the fire. Residential well and
spring samples analyses showed
concentrations below Federal Maximum
Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Sediment
analyses showed numerous inorganics
in Rhinehart’s Pond (such as arsenic,
cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,
selenium, and zinc) and Massey Run
and Hogue Creek (such as copper,
cyanide, iron, and zinc). Although the
results of the OU–3 human health risk
assessment indicated a potential risk
associated with exposure to inorganics
in the surface soil, subsurface soil, and
ground water, a background study
indicated that the levels detected were
statistically comparable to background
levels. As such, these media did not
require remediation and were not
considered when remedial action
objectives were developed. The only
RAO developed for human health was
the potential risk associated with
ingestion of fish from Hogue Creek, due
to potential noncancer hazards above
recommended levels.
An Ecological Risk Assessment was
performed to determine the risk or harm
to ecological resources from exposure to
contaminants from the Site, including
toxicity evaluation of the sediment in
Rhinehart’s Pond and Massey Run. Of
all the metals calculated to pose a
potential risk, zinc was determined to
pose the highest risk to the ecological
receptors at the Site, and was
determined to be the driver of the
ecological risk found at the Site. In
summary, the potential adverse impacts
on ecological receptors in Rhinehart’s
Pond and Massey Run is associated with
zinc in the sediment and cyanide and
iron in the surface water.
The OU–3 ROD, issued on September
29, 2000, provided for the third and
final phase of the long-term cleanup.
The OU–3 RAOs were to: Prevent
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44065
ecological exposure to levels of zinc
exceeding 1,600 mg/kg; prevent
migration and leaching of contaminants
in the sediment that may contaminate
the surface water in Rhinehart’s Pond,
Massey Run, and Hogue Creek; and,
decommission the previously
constructed facilities. This remedy
consisted of: treating the remaining
surface water in Rhinehart’s Pond;
solidification of the sediments in
Rhinehart’s Pond that exceeded 1,600
mg/kg zinc; removal of the sediments in
Massey Run which exceeded 1,600 mg/
kg zinc; offsite disposal of all sediments;
and, decommissioning the previously
constructed facilities, including
covering the shotcrete with soil,
removing the surface water collection
system, the treatment plant, and the
dam at Rhinehart’s Pond, as well as regrading and re-vegetating the site and
restoring the stream where Rhinehart’s
Pond was located.
Cleanup Standards
The remedial action cleanup activities
at the Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump site are
consistent with the objectives of the
NCP and will provide protection to
human health and the environment. The
RAO for OU–1 (reducing or eliminating
the continued migration of
contaminants off-site) was met when
EPA stabilized the site by placing
shotcrete on the fire damaged slopes
and diverted the surface water through
construction of a collection sewer.
Effluent limits set by the Virginia Water
Control Board were met prior to
discharge of the water to Massey Run,
as evidenced by the effluent sampling
forms, after construction of the water
treatment plant.
The RAO set for OU–2 was met
through the clean closure of Dutchman’s
Pond. All of the surface water was
diverted to Rhinehart’s Pond for
treatment through the water treatment
system and the sediment was solidified
prior to offsite disposal. During
excavation of the soil surrounding the
pond, EPA performed confirmatory
sampling to determine whether the
cleanup standard of 50 mg/kg of zinc
was met. However, the soil removal had
to be stopped when it was feared that
any further excavation could undermine
the dam at Rhinehart’s Pond. EPA
issued an Explanation of Significant
Differences, with the concurrence of the
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, to formalize this decision to
stop the excavation of soil.
The OU–3 RAOs were to: Prevent
ecological exposure to levels of zinc
exceeding 1,600 mg/kg; prevent
migration and leaching of contaminants
in the sediment that may contaminate
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44066
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 146 / Monday, August 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the surface water in Rhinehart’s Pond,
Massey Run, and Hogue Creek; and,
decommission the previously
constructed facilities. These RAOs were
met by treating the surface water in
Rhinehart’s Pond; removing, solidifying,
and disposing of the sediment in
Rhinehart’s Pond which exceeded 1,600
mg/kg of zinc; removing and disposing
of the sediment in Massey Run which
exceeded 1,600 mg/kg of zinc; and
decommissioning the facilities
previously constructed. Monitoring was
performed on the treatment plant
discharge to ensure the effluent
standards were met. Confirmatory
sampling was performed to ensure that
the cleanup level was achieved in
Rhinehart’s Pond. Confirmatory
sampling was not performed for the
sediment removal in Massey Run
because EPA identified all of the stream
pools in which sediment had to be
removed and all of the sediment was
removed in each of these pools.
Operation and Maintenance
The facilities constructed under OU–
1 were operated and maintained by EPA
from 1992 to 2002. The Commonwealth
of Virginia contributed its ten percent
share of these operation and
maintenance costs through a Superfund
State Contract.
All of the facilities constructed under
OU–1 were decommissioned as part of
the OU–3 Remedial Action, leaving
nothing left to operate or maintain. In
addition, re-vegetation of the site
(performed as part of OU–3) was
designed to return the site to a natural
condition. The trees, bushes, and grass
seed mixtures used were selected by the
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service because
they are indigenous to the area. During
the June 21, 2004 inspection, the U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service verified that
significant plant and tree species had
taken root within the stream area and
along the stream banks, with good plant
diversity and healthy condition.
Five-Year Review
CERCLA requires a five-year review of
all sites where the remedial action
results in hazardous substances,
pollutants or contaminants remaining at
the site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA has completed two FiveYear Reviews for this Site. The first was
completed on September 12, 1997
(while clean-up was ongoing) and the
second on November 6, 2002 (just at the
end of the OU–3 Remedial Action).
Since all of the remaining
contaminated media (surface water and
sediment from Rhinehart’s Pond and
sediment from Massey Run) was
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:24 Jul 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
removed from the Site as part of the
OU–3 Remedial Action, there are no
hazardous substances, pollutants or
contaminants remaining at the Site
above levels that allow for unlimited
use and unrestricted exposure. Thus, no
additional Five-Year reviews will be
conducted. Further, there are no
institutional controls needed for this
Site.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have
been satisfied as required in CERCLA
section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and
CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617.
Documents in the Site docket which
EPA relied on for recommendation of
the deletion of the Site from the NPL are
available to the public in the
information repositories.
V. Deletion Action
EPA, with the concurrence of the
Commonwealth of Virginia through the
Department of Environmental Quality,
has determined that all appropriate
responses under CERCLA have been
completed at the Site, and that no
further response actions are necessary.
Therefore, EPA is deleting the Site from
the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication of a
notice of intent to delete. This action
will be effective September 30, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by August 31, 2005, on this notice or the
parallel notice of intent to delete
published in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register. If
adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of deletion before the
effective date of the deletion and it will
not take effect and EPA will also
prepare a response to comments and
continue with the deletion process on
the basis of the notice of intent to delete
and the comments already received.
There will be no additional opportunity
to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: July 26, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region III.
For the reasons set out in the preamble,
40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 300—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
I 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300
is amended under Virginia (‘‘VA’’) by
removing the site name ‘‘Rhinehart Tire
Fire Dump.’’
[FR Doc. 05–15151 Filed 7–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 050510127–5190–02; I.D.
050305D]
RIN 0648–AS35
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Deep-Sea Red Crab
Fishery; Framework Adjustment 1 to
the Atlantic Deep-Sea Red Crab
Fishery Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS issues final regulations
to implement Framework Adjustment 1
to the Atlantic Deep-Sea Red Crab (Red
Crab) Fishery Management Plan (FMP).
This final rule modifies the existing
annual review and specification process
by allowing specifications to be set for
up to 3 years at a time, and continues
the current target total allowable catch
(TAC) of 5.928 million lb (2.69 million
kg) and fleet days-at-sea (DAS) of 780
fleet DAS for fishing year (FY) 2006 and
FY2007. The purpose of this action is to
conserve and manage the red crab
resource, reduce the staff resources
necessary to effectively manage this
fishery, and provide consistency and
predictability to the industry.
DATES: This rule is effective August 31,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents, including the
Environmental Assessment (EA),
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), and Stock Assessment and
Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) Report, are
available from Paul J. Howard,
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 146 (Monday, August 1, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44063-44066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15151]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-7947-1]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final notice of deletion of the Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump
Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region III is
publishing a direct final notice of deletion of the Rhinehart Tire Fire
Dump Superfund Site (Site), located near Winchester (Frederick County),
Virginia, from the National Priorities List (NPL).
The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as
amended (CERCLA), is Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP).
This direct final notice of deletion is being published by EPA with the
concurrence of the Commonwealth of Virginia, through the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ), because EPA has determined
that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been completed
and, therefore, further remedial action pursuant to CERCLA is not
appropriate.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be effective September 30, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 31, 2005. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final deletion in the Federal Register informing the public that
the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Andrew Palestini, Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. EPA Region III (3HS23), 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029, Palestini.andy@epa.gov, (215) 814-3233.
Information Repositories: Comprehensive information about the Site
is available for viewing and copying at the site information
repositories located at: U.S. EPA Region III, Regional Center for
Environmental Information (RCEI), 1650 Arch Street (2nd Floor),
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029, (215) 814-5254, Monday through Friday, 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.; and, in Virginia, at the Handley Library, 100 West
Piccadilly Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540) 662-9041 ext. 23. Hours
of operation are: Monday through Wednesday, 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. and
Thursday through Saturday, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Palestini, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. EPA Region III (3HS23), 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
PA 19103-2029, Palestini.andy@epa.gov, (215) 814-3233 or 1-800-553-
2509.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region III is publishing this direct final notice of deletion
of the
[[Page 44064]]
Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump Superfund Site from the NPL.
The EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant risk
to public health or the environment and maintains the NPL as the list
of those sites. As described in Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites
deleted from the NPL remain eligible for remedial actions if conditions
at a deleted site warrant such action.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication of a notice of
intent to delete. This action will be effective September 30, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 31, 2005, on this notice
or the parallel notice of intent to delete published in the ``Proposed
Rules'' section of today's Federal Register. If adverse comments are
received within the 30-day public comment period on this notice or the
notice of intent to delete, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
this direct final notice of deletion before the effective date of the
deletion and the deletion will not take effect. EPA will, as
appropriate, prepare a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump
Superfund Site and demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria.
Section V discusses EPA's action to delete the Site from the NPL unless
adverse comments are received during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP provides that releases may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making a
determination to delete a Site from the NPL, EPA shall consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed (Hazardous Substance Superfund
Response Trust Fund) response under CERCLA has been implemented, and no
further response action by responsible parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remain at the deleted site above levels
that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, CERCLA Sec.
121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9621(c), requires that a subsequent review of the
site be conducted at least every five years after the initiation of the
remedial action at the deleted site to ensure that the action remains
protective of public health and the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a need for further action, EPA may
initiate remedial actions. Whenever there is a significant release from
a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the
NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the Commonwealth of Virginia on the deletion
of the Site from the NPL prior to developing this direct final notice
of deletion.
(2) The Commonwealth of Virginia has concurred with deletion of the
Site from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication of this direct final notice
of deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel notice of
intent to delete published today in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
the Federal Register is being published in a major local newspaper of
general circulation at or near the Site and is being distributed to
appropriate federal, state, and local government officials and other
interested parties; the newspaper notice announces the 30-day public
comment period concerning the notice of intent to delete the Site from
the NPL.
(4) EPA placed copies of documents supporting the deletion in the
Site information repositories identified above.
(5) If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this notice or the companion notice of intent to
delete also published in today's Federal Register, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this direct final notice of deletion
before its effective date. EPA will, as appropriate, prepare a response
to comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
notice of intent to delete and the comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's rights or obligations. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist EPA management. Section
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion of a site from the
NPL does not preclude eligibility for future response actions, should
future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
Site from the NPL:
Site History and Characteristics
Land and Resource Use
The Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump Site is approximately 10 acres in size
and is located on a much larger residential parcel of land located in a
sparsely populated rural area in western Frederick County, Virginia
approximately six miles west of Winchester. The upland portion of the
Site, where most of the Superfund response work took place, is
approximately 5 acres in size. Title of the property which constitutes
the Site, as well as the remaining portion of the Rhinehart Farm, is
part of the Rhinehart estate. The Site includes the head waters of
Massey Run which flows into Hogue Creek and then into the Potomac
River.
History of Contamination/Response Actions
Between 1972 and 1983, the operator (also the site owner) used the
ravine behind his home as a tire storage area. During the course of his
business, it is estimated that as many as twenty-five million tires
were handled by the operator. Most of the tires were sold for re-tread
and others for dock linings, etc. The remainder were stored in the
ravine.
On October 31, 1983, a fire broke out in the tire storage area, and
engulfed an estimated 5 to 7 million tires that were being stored at
the site at that time. Due to the magnitude of the fire, state
officials requested assistance from EPA. The fire was brought under
control within a few days, but continued to smolder for six months. An
investigation revealed that the fire was caused by an arsonist.
The burning of the tires caused a release of contaminants and the
melting and pyrolysis of the tires produced a hot oily substance.
Chemically, the oily tar contained benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene,
anthracene, naphthalene, pyrene, cadmium, chromium, nickel,
[[Page 44065]]
and zinc. The fire posed an imminent and substantial threat to human
health and the environment through the release of airborne
contaminants, the release of hazardous substances to Massey Run, Hogue
Creek, and the Potomac River, as well as the fire threat to the
surrounding forest.
Initially, EPA constructed a catch basin to trap the free-flowing
oily substance as it began to seep out of the edge of the tire pile and
into Massey Run. However, because of a higher than estimated flow rate,
a second pond (later named Dutchman's Pond) was constructed down-slope
from the burn area. Dutchman's Pond was constructed as a lined, 50,000
gallon pond in mid-November 1983. Approximately 800,000 gallons of oil
product were eventually collected, removed from the site, and recycled
as fuel oil.
To address the long-term cleanup, the site was placed on the
National Priorities List (NPL) on June 10, 1986. EPA split the remedial
activities into three operable units. The purpose of Operable Unit 1
(OU-1) was to control the off-site migration of contaminants and to re-
stabilize the area. The purpose of OU-2 was to decommission Dutchman's
Pond. The purpose of OU-3 was to address site-wide contamination.
Aquatic toxicity was identified in the OU-1 Remedial Investigation
as the principal environmental concern at the site. Contaminated runoff
from the site was found to be the main contributor to the chronic and
acute toxicity observed in surface water samples taken from locations
downstream of the site. Zinc, detected at levels exceeding the ambient
water quality, was thought to be the primary contributor of risk to
aquatic life. EPA selected an interim remedy in the OU-1 Record of
Decision (ROD) dated June 30, 1988, with the Remedial Action Objective
(RAO) of reducing or eliminating the continued migration of
contaminants off-site. The slopes were stabilized by covering them with
shotcrete (a concrete-like substance) and storm sewers were constructed
to transport the collected surface water to Rhinehart's Pond. The dam
at the pond was raised ten feet to enable gravity settling of the
collected water. A water treatment plant was installed when it was
determined that gravity settling alone would not meet the effluent
standards set by the Virginia Water Control Board.
The RAO for OU-2 was to eliminate the immediate threat of release
of contaminants from Dutchman's Pond to Massey Run. Dutchman's Pond
posed an imminent threat to the aquatic life in Massey Run because only
six inches of freeboard remained. Samples taken from the pond verified
surface water and sediment contamination; Again, zinc was the primary
contributor of aquatic risk. The remedy selected for OU-2, in the
September 29, 1992 ROD, was clean closure of Dutchman's Pond,
including: transporting the surface water to Rhinehart's Pond for
eventual treatment; solidification of the sediment; and, off-site
disposal of the solidified sediment, pond liner, and the soil
surrounding the pond which exceeded 50 mg/kg zinc.
Because the previous operable units focused on the immediate
threats posed by the contamination at the site, EPA evaluated long-term
threats as part of OU-3. The OU-3 Remedial Investigation consisted of
site-wide sampling to characterize and identify potential ground water,
soil, surface water, and sediment contamination from the fire.
Residential well and spring samples analyses showed concentrations
below Federal Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Sediment analyses
showed numerous inorganics in Rhinehart's Pond (such as arsenic,
cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, and zinc) and Massey
Run and Hogue Creek (such as copper, cyanide, iron, and zinc). Although
the results of the OU-3 human health risk assessment indicated a
potential risk associated with exposure to inorganics in the surface
soil, subsurface soil, and ground water, a background study indicated
that the levels detected were statistically comparable to background
levels. As such, these media did not require remediation and were not
considered when remedial action objectives were developed. The only RAO
developed for human health was the potential risk associated with
ingestion of fish from Hogue Creek, due to potential noncancer hazards
above recommended levels.
An Ecological Risk Assessment was performed to determine the risk
or harm to ecological resources from exposure to contaminants from the
Site, including toxicity evaluation of the sediment in Rhinehart's Pond
and Massey Run. Of all the metals calculated to pose a potential risk,
zinc was determined to pose the highest risk to the ecological
receptors at the Site, and was determined to be the driver of the
ecological risk found at the Site. In summary, the potential adverse
impacts on ecological receptors in Rhinehart's Pond and Massey Run is
associated with zinc in the sediment and cyanide and iron in the
surface water.
The OU-3 ROD, issued on September 29, 2000, provided for the third
and final phase of the long-term cleanup. The OU-3 RAOs were to:
Prevent ecological exposure to levels of zinc exceeding 1,600 mg/kg;
prevent migration and leaching of contaminants in the sediment that may
contaminate the surface water in Rhinehart's Pond, Massey Run, and
Hogue Creek; and, decommission the previously constructed facilities.
This remedy consisted of: treating the remaining surface water in
Rhinehart's Pond; solidification of the sediments in Rhinehart's Pond
that exceeded 1,600 mg/kg zinc; removal of the sediments in Massey Run
which exceeded 1,600 mg/kg zinc; offsite disposal of all sediments;
and, decommissioning the previously constructed facilities, including
covering the shotcrete with soil, removing the surface water collection
system, the treatment plant, and the dam at Rhinehart's Pond, as well
as re-grading and re-vegetating the site and restoring the stream where
Rhinehart's Pond was located.
Cleanup Standards
The remedial action cleanup activities at the Rhinehart Tire Fire
Dump site are consistent with the objectives of the NCP and will
provide protection to human health and the environment. The RAO for OU-
1 (reducing or eliminating the continued migration of contaminants off-
site) was met when EPA stabilized the site by placing shotcrete on the
fire damaged slopes and diverted the surface water through construction
of a collection sewer. Effluent limits set by the Virginia Water
Control Board were met prior to discharge of the water to Massey Run,
as evidenced by the effluent sampling forms, after construction of the
water treatment plant.
The RAO set for OU-2 was met through the clean closure of
Dutchman's Pond. All of the surface water was diverted to Rhinehart's
Pond for treatment through the water treatment system and the sediment
was solidified prior to offsite disposal. During excavation of the soil
surrounding the pond, EPA performed confirmatory sampling to determine
whether the cleanup standard of 50 mg/kg of zinc was met. However, the
soil removal had to be stopped when it was feared that any further
excavation could undermine the dam at Rhinehart's Pond. EPA issued an
Explanation of Significant Differences, with the concurrence of the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, to formalize this
decision to stop the excavation of soil.
The OU-3 RAOs were to: Prevent ecological exposure to levels of
zinc exceeding 1,600 mg/kg; prevent migration and leaching of
contaminants in the sediment that may contaminate
[[Page 44066]]
the surface water in Rhinehart's Pond, Massey Run, and Hogue Creek;
and, decommission the previously constructed facilities. These RAOs
were met by treating the surface water in Rhinehart's Pond; removing,
solidifying, and disposing of the sediment in Rhinehart's Pond which
exceeded 1,600 mg/kg of zinc; removing and disposing of the sediment in
Massey Run which exceeded 1,600 mg/kg of zinc; and decommissioning the
facilities previously constructed. Monitoring was performed on the
treatment plant discharge to ensure the effluent standards were met.
Confirmatory sampling was performed to ensure that the cleanup level
was achieved in Rhinehart's Pond. Confirmatory sampling was not
performed for the sediment removal in Massey Run because EPA identified
all of the stream pools in which sediment had to be removed and all of
the sediment was removed in each of these pools.
Operation and Maintenance
The facilities constructed under OU-1 were operated and maintained
by EPA from 1992 to 2002. The Commonwealth of Virginia contributed its
ten percent share of these operation and maintenance costs through a
Superfund State Contract.
All of the facilities constructed under OU-1 were decommissioned as
part of the OU-3 Remedial Action, leaving nothing left to operate or
maintain. In addition, re-vegetation of the site (performed as part of
OU-3) was designed to return the site to a natural condition. The
trees, bushes, and grass seed mixtures used were selected by the U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service because they are indigenous to the area. During
the June 21, 2004 inspection, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service verified
that significant plant and tree species had taken root within the
stream area and along the stream banks, with good plant diversity and
healthy condition.
Five-Year Review
CERCLA requires a five-year review of all sites where the remedial
action results in hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants
remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. EPA has completed two Five-Year Reviews for this
Site. The first was completed on September 12, 1997 (while clean-up was
ongoing) and the second on November 6, 2002 (just at the end of the OU-
3 Remedial Action).
Since all of the remaining contaminated media (surface water and
sediment from Rhinehart's Pond and sediment from Massey Run) was
removed from the Site as part of the OU-3 Remedial Action, there are no
hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants remaining at the Site
above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.
Thus, no additional Five-Year reviews will be conducted. Further, there
are no institutional controls needed for this Site.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA section 117, 42
U.S.C. 9617. Documents in the Site docket which EPA relied on for
recommendation of the deletion of the Site from the NPL are available
to the public in the information repositories.
V. Deletion Action
EPA, with the concurrence of the Commonwealth of Virginia through
the Department of Environmental Quality, has determined that all
appropriate responses under CERCLA have been completed at the Site, and
that no further response actions are necessary. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication of a notice of
intent to delete. This action will be effective September 30, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 31, 2005, on this notice
or the parallel notice of intent to delete published in the ``Proposed
Rules'' section of today's Federal Register. If adverse comments are
received within the 30-day public comment period, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final notice of deletion before the
effective date of the deletion and it will not take effect and EPA will
also prepare a response to comments and continue with the deletion
process on the basis of the notice of intent to delete and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: July 26, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region III.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended under Virginia (``VA'')
by removing the site name ``Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump.''
[FR Doc. 05-15151 Filed 7-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P