ISO New England Inc. and New England Power Pool; Notice of Technical Conference, 43863-43864 [E5-4054]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Notices
Dated: May 19, 2005.
Kirk C. Rodgers,
Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau
of Reclamation.
Dated: May 16, 2005.
Joseph D. Morgan,
Director, Division of Hydropower
Administration and Compliance, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–15013 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
For further information, contact
Rebecca Martin at (202) 502–6012.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4032 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
[Docket No. ER05–795–001]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
ISO New England Inc. and New
England Power Pool; Notice of
Technical Conference
[Project No. 2105–095]
July 22, 2005.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company;
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment
July 21, 2005.
In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (Commission)
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No.
486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy
Projects’ staff has prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) for an
application for a non-capacity related
amendment of the Lake Almanor
Development of the Upper North Fork
Feather River Project. The Upper North
Fork Feather River Project, FERC No.
2105, is located on the Butt Creek and
North Fork Feather River in Plumas
County, California.
The EA contains the staff’s analysis of
the potential environmental impacts of
the proposal and concludes that
approval of the proposal would not
constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment.
A copy of the EA is attached to a July
20, 2005, Commission order titled
‘‘Order Approving Application for
Amendment of License and Revised
Exhibit K,’’ which is available for
review and reproduction at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
located at 888 First Street, NE., Room
2A, Washington, DC 20426. The EA may
also be viewed on the Commission’s
website at https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘elibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number
(prefaced by P-) and excluding the last
three digits, in the docket number field
to access the document. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:05 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff will hold a
technical conference with ISO New
England Inc. (ISO–NE) to discuss certain
aspects of the ‘‘Joint Request for
Clarification, or in the Alternative,
Rehearing; Request for Expedited
Action; and Request for Deferral of
Filing Requirements of ISO New
England Inc. and New England Power
Pool’’ (Joint Request) filed on June 23,
2005 in Docket No. ER05–795–001.
The conference will take place on
Thursday, July 28, 2005 from 8:30 a.m.
to 9:30 a.m. (e.d.t.), in Room 3M–3 of
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First St., NE.,
Washington DC 20426.
Specifically, the purpose of the
conference is to discuss the mechanism
for selecting generating units to provide
Regulation Service as proposed in an
April 7 filing, and how Regulation
Clearing Prices would be established.
The conference will also discuss any
possible inconsistencies in the
description of the mechanism as found
in (i) the proposed Tariff revisions
(especially section III.1.11.5 and section
III.3.2.2), (ii) the Joint Request,1 and (iii)
the proposed revisions to the ISO–NE
Manual for Market Operations, Manual
M–11 (Revision XX—ASM Phase I),
section 3 (especially section 3.2.5).2
During the conference, ISO–NE
should be prepared to explain the
proposed steps that would be taken to
select generators to provide Regulation
Service and to determine the Regulation
1 The Joint Request (at 6–7) describes a 7-step
process for determining the Resources that would
be selected to provide Regulation Service and for
determining the Regulation Clearing Price.
2 The ISO–NE Manual for Market Operations has
not been filed with the Commission. It may be
found on the ISO–NE Web site at https://www.isone.com/rules_proceds/isone_mnls/M–
11_Market%20Operations_(Revision%20XX)_10–
01–05.doc.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43863
Clearing Price. To aid in this discussion,
Staff requests ISO–NE to use the
hypothetical example described in the
Appendix to this Notice to illustrate
how Resources would be selected to
provide Regulation Service and how the
Regulation Clearing Price would be
determined. ISO–NE should also be
prepared to explain whether, under its
proposal, the Resources selected to
provide Regulation Service would be
those whose total costs of providing
Regulation Service are the lowest. In
addition, ISO–NE should be prepared to
discuss the rationale for recalculating
updated Regulation Rank Prices for
generating units with Regulation Offer
Prices that are less than the initial
Regulation Clearing Price, as described
in section 3.2.5(2) of the proposed
revision to Manual M–11.
The conference is open for the public
to attend. In addition, a telephone line
will be provided for interested parties to
call in and participate in the conference.
Below is the call-in information for the
conference call:
Date: July 28, 2005.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. e.d.t.
Toll-free Number: 877–546–1566.
Passcode: 65271.
Leader’s Name: Mr. David Mead.
Parties interested in submitting
comments following the conference
must do so no later than August 11,
2005.
FERC conferences are accessible
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. For accessibility
accommodations please send an e-mail
to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free
1–866–208–3372 (voice) or 202–208–
1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202–208–
2106 with the required
accommodations.
For more information about the
conference, please contact: David Mead
at (202) 502–8028 or
david.mead@ferc.gov.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
Appendix
The following is a hypothetical example to
be used during the technical conference to
help illustrate how Resources would be
selected to provide Regulation Service and
how the Regulation Clearing Price would be
determined.
Assume that 150 MW of Regulation
Capability must be procured to provide
Regulation Service for a particular hour.
Assume that 6 different Resources, A through
F, have submitted offers to provide
Regulation Service. Each of the 6 Resources
has an Automatic Response Rate of 10 MW
per minute, and thus, a Regulation Capability
of 50 MW (i.e., 10 MW per minute times 5
minutes). Although each Resource has
submitted a different Energy Bid (shown in
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
43864
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Notices
the table below), the Energy Bid of each
Resource is constant over its entire operating
range. The day-ahead and real-time LMP
throughout New England during the hour in
question is $70/MWh. None of the bids from
the Resources has any start-up or minimum
load costs. The Capability-to-Service Ratio
used in calculating the Regulation Service
Credit for each Resource is 0.1. (ISO–NE
should comment during the conference
whether it is reasonable to assume that the
Capability-to-Service Ratio used in selecting
Resources would be the same for all
Resources.)
Assume that the 6 Resources submit the
following in their bids to supply Regulation
Service and Energy:
INFORMATION IN BIDS TO SUPPLY REGULATION SERVICE AND ENERGY AND DERIVED OPPORTUNITY COST, IN $/MWH
Regulation
offer
Resource
A
B
C
D
E
F
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
ISO–NE should be prepared to explain
during the conference how its proposal
would determine which of these Resources
would be selected to provide Regulation
Service, and how the Regulation Clearing
Price would be determined. If additional
information is also needed to determine
which Resources are selected and what
Regulation Clearing Price is calculated, ISO–
NE should identify the information at the
conference and add reasonable hypothetical
values for this information to the above
example.
[FR Doc. E5–4054 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. AD05–12–000]
Report on Generator Offers in the
Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator Market Launch;
Notice Inviting Comments on Staff
Report
July 22, 2005.
The Commission is posting, and
inviting comment upon, a staff report,
‘‘Report on Generator Offers in the
Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator Market Launch’’
(Report). The Report presents
information and staff conclusions
related to generator supply offers made
into the Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator (MISO)
during the two months following the
launch of the MISO Energy Markets, a
period during which MISO market
participants were required to offer
supply into MISO at cost.
The purpose of this Notice is to solicit
comment on the Report and, in
particular, on staff’s recommendations
(contained in Section VI of the Report,
Analysis and Observations) that may
assist the Commission in the
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:05 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
development of policies relating to the
issues raised in the Report. The Report
will be posted on the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.ferc.gov.
Comments on the Report should be
filed within 30 days of the issuance of
this Notice. The Commission
encourages electronic submission of
comments in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the comment to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
All filings in this docket are
accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and will be available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Questions regarding this Notice
should be directed to:
David Tobenkin, Office of Market
Oversight and Investigations, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, 202–502–6445,
david.tobenkin@ferc.gov.
William Meroney, Office of Market
Oversight and Investigations, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, 202–502–8069,
william.meroney@ferc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Energy bid
$10
20
40
45
50
60
Derived opportunity cost
$85
75
70
70
40
25
$15
5
0
0
30
45
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on August 22, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4058 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Notice of Membership of Performance
Review Board for Senior Executives
(PRB)
July 22, 2005.
The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission hereby provides notice of
the membership of its Performance
Review Board (PRB) for the
Commission’s Senior Executive Service
(SES) members. The function of this
board is to make recommendations
relating to the performance of senior
executives in the Commission. This
action is undertaken in accordance with
Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4). The
Commission’s PRB will remove the
following member: William F.
Hederman. And will add the following
member: Shelton M. Cannon.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4055 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7946–1]
Agency Information Collection
Activities OMB Responses
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 145 (Friday, July 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43863-43864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4054]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER05-795-001]
ISO New England Inc. and New England Power Pool; Notice of
Technical Conference
July 22, 2005.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff will hold a technical conference with ISO New
England Inc. (ISO-NE) to discuss certain aspects of the ``Joint Request
for Clarification, or in the Alternative, Rehearing; Request for
Expedited Action; and Request for Deferral of Filing Requirements of
ISO New England Inc. and New England Power Pool'' (Joint Request) filed
on June 23, 2005 in Docket No. ER05-795-001.
The conference will take place on Thursday, July 28, 2005 from 8:30
a.m. to 9:30 a.m. (e.d.t.), in Room 3M-3 of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington DC 20426.
Specifically, the purpose of the conference is to discuss the
mechanism for selecting generating units to provide Regulation Service
as proposed in an April 7 filing, and how Regulation Clearing Prices
would be established. The conference will also discuss any possible
inconsistencies in the description of the mechanism as found in (i) the
proposed Tariff revisions (especially section III.1.11.5 and section
III.3.2.2), (ii) the Joint Request,\1\ and (iii) the proposed revisions
to the ISO-NE Manual for Market Operations, Manual M-11 (Revision XX--
ASM Phase I), section 3 (especially section 3.2.5).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Joint Request (at 6-7) describes a 7-step process for
determining the Resources that would be selected to provide
Regulation Service and for determining the Regulation Clearing
Price.
\2\ The ISO-NE Manual for Market Operations has not been filed
with the Commission. It may be found on the ISO-NE Web site at
https://www.iso-ne.com/rules_proceds/isone_mnls/M-11_
Market%20Operations--(Revision%20XX)--10-01-05.doc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the conference, ISO-NE should be prepared to explain the
proposed steps that would be taken to select generators to provide
Regulation Service and to determine the Regulation Clearing Price. To
aid in this discussion, Staff requests ISO-NE to use the hypothetical
example described in the Appendix to this Notice to illustrate how
Resources would be selected to provide Regulation Service and how the
Regulation Clearing Price would be determined. ISO-NE should also be
prepared to explain whether, under its proposal, the Resources selected
to provide Regulation Service would be those whose total costs of
providing Regulation Service are the lowest. In addition, ISO-NE should
be prepared to discuss the rationale for recalculating updated
Regulation Rank Prices for generating units with Regulation Offer
Prices that are less than the initial Regulation Clearing Price, as
described in section 3.2.5(2) of the proposed revision to Manual M-11.
The conference is open for the public to attend. In addition, a
telephone line will be provided for interested parties to call in and
participate in the conference. Below is the call-in information for the
conference call:
Date: July 28, 2005.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. e.d.t.
Toll-free Number: 877-546-1566.
Passcode: 65271.
Leader's Name: Mr. David Mead.
Parties interested in submitting comments following the conference
must do so no later than August 11, 2005.
FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an e-mail to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with
the required accommodations.
For more information about the conference, please contact: David
Mead at (202) 502-8028 or david.mead@ferc.gov.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
Appendix
The following is a hypothetical example to be used during the
technical conference to help illustrate how Resources would be
selected to provide Regulation Service and how the Regulation
Clearing Price would be determined.
Assume that 150 MW of Regulation Capability must be procured to
provide Regulation Service for a particular hour. Assume that 6
different Resources, A through F, have submitted offers to provide
Regulation Service. Each of the 6 Resources has an Automatic
Response Rate of 10 MW per minute, and thus, a Regulation Capability
of 50 MW (i.e., 10 MW per minute times 5 minutes). Although each
Resource has submitted a different Energy Bid (shown in
[[Page 43864]]
the table below), the Energy Bid of each Resource is constant over
its entire operating range. The day-ahead and real-time LMP
throughout New England during the hour in question is $70/MWh. None
of the bids from the Resources has any start-up or minimum load
costs. The Capability-to-Service Ratio used in calculating the
Regulation Service Credit for each Resource is 0.1. (ISO-NE should
comment during the conference whether it is reasonable to assume
that the Capability-to-Service Ratio used in selecting Resources
would be the same for all Resources.)
Assume that the 6 Resources submit the following in their bids
to supply Regulation Service and Energy:
Information in Bids to Supply Regulation Service and Energy and Derived Opportunity Cost, in $/MWh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derived
Resource Regulation Energy bid opportunity
offer cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A............................................................... $10 $85 $15
B............................................................... 20 75 5
C............................................................... 40 70 0
D............................................................... 45 70 0
E............................................................... 50 40 30
F............................................................... 60 25 45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISO-NE should be prepared to explain during the conference how
its proposal would determine which of these Resources would be
selected to provide Regulation Service, and how the Regulation
Clearing Price would be determined. If additional information is
also needed to determine which Resources are selected and what
Regulation Clearing Price is calculated, ISO-NE should identify the
information at the conference and add reasonable hypothetical values
for this information to the above example.
[FR Doc. E5-4054 Filed 7-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P