National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 43781-43785 [05-15044]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
edge of Salt Creek at latitude 32.45194°,
longitude 80.724473°, thence continuing
in a northerly direction along the
shoreline of the MCAS and continuing
on to its intersection again with Salt
Creek and adjacent to U.S. Highway 21,
thence turning and continuing along the
shoreline of Salt Creek in an easterly
direction and returning back to the
starting point at latitude 32.45194°,
longitude 80.724473°.
(6) That section of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW),
beginning at the confluence of the
AIWW and Albergottie Creek, being that
point on the west side of the AIWW
navigational channel at latitude
32.457226°, longitude 80.687770°,
thence continuing in a northerly
direction along the western channel
edge of the AIWW to latitude
32.458580°, longitude 80.689181°,
thence to latitude 32.460413°, longitude
80.689228°, thence to latitude
32.461459°, longitude 80.689418°,
thence to latitude 32.464015°, longitude
80.690294°, thence to latitude
32.470255°, longitude 80.690965°,
thence to latitude 32.471309°, longitude
80.691196°, thence to latitude
32.475084°, longitude 80.692455°,
thence to latitude 32.478161°, longitude
80.691546°, thence to latitude
32.479191°, longitude 80.691486°,
thence to latitude 32.481817°, longitude
80.691939°, thence to latitude
32.493001°, longitude 80.689835°,
thence to latitude 32.494422°, longitude
80.688296°, thence crossing the AIWW
channel in a southeasterly direction to
a point on the east side of the AIWW
and the marsh edge of bank, latitude
32.49343°, longitude 80.68699°, thence
southward along the edge of the AIWW
and the waterward marsh edge of Ladies
Island to a point on the west shoreline
of Pleasant Point Peninsular, latitude
32.45806°, longitude 80.68668°, thence
back across the AIWW navigational
channel to the point of beginning,
latitude 32.457226°, longitude
80.687770°.
(7) That portion of Mulligan Creek,
beginning at its northern mouth and
confluence with McCalleys Creek,
latitude 32.50763°, longitude 80.69337°,
thence proceeding in a westerly
direction along the northern shoreline of
Mulligan Creek to its intersection with
Perryclear Drive bridge crossing,
latitude 32.50534°, longitude 80.69960°,
thence back down the southern
shoreline to its starting point at
McCalleys Creek, latitude 32.50763°,
longitude 80.69337°.
(8) That portion of Mulligan Creek,
beginning at the Perryclear Drive bridge
crossing, latitude 32.50534°, longitude
80.69960°, thence proceeding in a south
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:28 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
westerly direction along the northern
shoreline of Mulligan Creek to the
terminus of its western tributary, thence
back down its southern shoreline to the
terminus of its eastern terminus located
at the northern end on the MCAS
runway, latitude 32.49531°, longitude
80.70658°, thence back down the
southern shoreline to its starting point
at Perryclear Drive bridge crossing,
latitude 32.50534°, longitude 80.69960°.
(9) (Laurel Bay Military Family
Housing Area, Broad River) That section
of the Broad River, beginning on the
western shoreline of Laurel Bay Military
Family Housing Area boundary line, at
latitude 32.449295°, longitude
80.803205°, thence proceeding in a
northerly direction along the shoreline
to the housing area northern boundary
line at latitude 32.471172°, longitude
80.809795°, thence proceeding a
distance of 500 feet into the Broad
River, latitude 32.471185°, longitude
80.811440°, thence proceeding in a
southerly direction and maintaining a
distance of 500 feet from the shoreline
to latitude 32.449222°, longitude
80.804825°, thence back towards the
shoreline to the point of beginning at
latitude 32.449295°, longitude
80.803205°.
(10) (Danger zone). That portion of
Mulligan Creek located adjacent to the
MCAS firing range and the restricted
area described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, beginning at a point on the
western shoreline of Mulligan Creek at
latitude 32.48771°, longitude 80.70424°,
thence northeasterly across Mulligan
Creek to the opposite shoreline at
latitude 32.48993°, longitude 80.69836°,
thence continuing in a southeasterly
direction to an upland island bordering
the northern shoreline of Mulligan
Creek at latitude 32.48579°, longitude
80.69706°, thence turning in a
southwesterly direction and crossing
Mulligan Creek to a point on the eastern
shoreline of the MCAS at latitude
32.48533°, longitude 80.70240°, thence
continuing along the eastern shoreline
of the MCAS to its starting point at
latitude 32.48771°, longitude 80.70424°.
(b) The regulation: (1) Unauthorized
personnel, vessels and other watercraft
shall not enter the restricted areas
described in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3),
(a)(4), (a)(5) and (a)(8) of this section at
any time.
(2) The public shall have unrestricted
access and use of the waters described
in paragraph (a)(6) of this section
whenever the MCAS is in Force
Protection Condition Normal, Alpha or
Bravo. Whenever the facility is in Force
Protection Condition Charlie or Delta,
personnel, vessels and other watercraft
entering the restricted area described in
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43781
paragraph (a)(6) of this section shall
proceed at normal speed and shall
under no circumstances anchor, fish,
loiter or photograph in any way until
clear of the restricted area.
(3) The public shall have unrestricted
access and use of the waters described
in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(7), and (a)(9) of
this section whenever the MCAS is in
Force Protection Condition Normal
Alpha or Bravo. Whenever the facility is
in Force Protection Condition Charlie or
Delta, personnel, vessels and other
watercraft are prohibited from entering
the waters described in paragraphs
(a)(1), (a)(7), and (a)(9) of this section,
unless they first obtain an escort or
other approval from the Commander,
MCAS, Beaufort, South Carolina.
(4) Unauthorized personnel, vessels
and other watercraft shall not enter the
danger zone described in paragraph
(a)(10) of this section at any time.
(5) All restricted areas and danger
zones will be marked with suitable
warning signs.
(6) It is understood that none of the
restrictions herein will apply to
properly marked Federal vessels
performing official duties.
(7) It is further understood that
unauthorized personnel will not take
photographs from within the above
described restricted areas.
(c) Enforcement: The regulation in
this section, promulgated by the United
States Army Corps of Engineers, shall be
enforced by the Commanding Officer,
MCAS Beaufort, or persons or agencies
as he/she may authorize including any
Federal Agency, State, Local or County
Law Enforcement agency, or Private
Security Firm in the employment of the
facility, so long as the entity
undertaking to enforce this Restricted
Area has the legal authority to do so
under the appropriate Federal, State or
local laws.
Dated: July 22, 2005.
Michael B. White,
Chief, Operations Division, Directorate of
Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 05–15040 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–7945–9]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection
Agency.
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
43782
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Direct final deletion of the
North Sea Municipal Landfill
Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 2, announces the
deletion of the North Sea Municipal
Landfill Superfund Site (Site), located
in Southampton, New York, from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and
requests public comment on this action.
While the Site is located in
Southampton, New York, it is
erroneously listed on the NPL as being
located in the City/County of North Sea.
The NPL is Appendix B of the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part
300, which EPA promulgated pursuant
to section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. This
Direct Final Notice of Deletion is being
published by EPA with the concurrence
of the State of New York, through the
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC).
EPA and NYSDEC have determined that
responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required to public
health or the environment.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be
effective September 27, 2005 unless
EPA receives significant adverse
comments by August 29, 2005. If
significant adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register, informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
Written comments should
be mailed to: Caroline Kwan, Remedial
Project Manager, Emergency and
Remedial Response Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2, 290 Broadway, 20th floor,
New York, NY 10007–1866.
Information Repositories:
Comprehensive information about the
Site is available for viewing and copying
at the Site information repositories
located at: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, 290
Broadway, Superfund Record Center,
Room 1828, New York, NY 10007–1866.
Hours: Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m., Telephone No. (212) 637–4308,
Southampton College, Reference
Department, 239 Montauk Highway,
Southampton, New York 11968–4100,
Hours: Monday to Friday till August 12,
2005 from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Closed from
August 13 till September 5, reopening
on September 6, Monday to Thursday
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:28 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., Saturday: 12
p.m. to 5 p.m., Telephone No. 631–287–
8379, The Rogers Memorial Library
(Reference Department), 91 Coopers
Farms Road, Southampton, New York
11968–4002, Hours: Monday to
Thursday from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., Friday:
10 a.m. to 7 p.m., Saturday: 10 a.m. to
5 p.m. , Sunday: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.,
Telephone No. (632) 283–0774.
Ms.
Caroline Kwan, Remedial Project
Manager, Emergency and Remedial
Response Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, 290
Broadway, 20th floor, New York, NY
10007–1866, (212) 637–4275; Fax
Number (212) 637–4284; email address:
kwan.caroline@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 2 announces the deletion
of the North Sea Municipal Landfill
Superfund Site (Site) from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The EPA maintains
the NPL as the list of those sites that
appear to present a significant risk to
public health or the environment. Sites
on the NPL can have remedial actions
financed by the Hazardous Substance
Superfund. As described in
§ 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a site deleted
from the NPL remains eligible for
remedial actions if conditions at the site
warrant such action.
EPA considers this action to be
noncontroversial and routine, and
therefore, EPA is taking it without prior
publication of a Notice of Intent to
Delete. This action will be effective
September 27, 2005 unless EPA receives
significant adverse comments by August
29, 2005 on this action or on the parallel
Notice of Intent to Delete published in
the Notice section of today’s Federal
Register. If significant adverse
comments are received within the 30day public comment period of this
action or the Notice of Intent to Delete,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
this Direct Final Deletion before the
effective date of the deletion and the
deletion will not take effect. EPA will,
if appropriate, prepare a response to
comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
Notice Intent to Delete and the
comments already received. In such a
case, there will be no additional
opportunity to comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section II explains the criteria for
deleting sites from the NPL. Section III
discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the
Site and demonstrates how it meets the
deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP
provides that Sites may be deleted from
the NPL where no further response is
appropriate. In accordance with
§ 300.425(e)(1), EPA shall consult with
the State to determine whether any of
the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other parties
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required; or,
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
responses under CERCLA have been
implemented, and no further action by
responsible parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore,
implementing remedial measures is not
appropriate.
In addition, the State shall concur
with the deletion, as required by
§ 300.425(e)(2), and the public shall be
informed, as required by § 300.425(e)(4).
A site which is deleted from the NPL
does remain eligible for remedial
actions should future conditions
warrant such action, as set forth in
§ 300.425(e)(3). Even if a site is deleted
from the NPL, where hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants
remain at the deleted site above levels
that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure, CERCLA section
121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9621(c) requires that a
subsequent review of the site be
conducted at least every five years after
the initiation of the remedial action at
the deleted site to ensure that the action
remains protective of public health and
the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a
need for further action, EPA may initiate
remedial actions. Whenever there is a
significant release from a site deleted
from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application
of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Site.
(1) The Site was listed on the NPL in
June 1986. The North Sea Municipal
Landfill Property (Landfill Property)
includes several former disposal areas,
including landfill cells and former
septic sludge lagoons. The Superfund
Site is composed of what was identified
as Cell No.1, the decommissioned septic
sludge lagoons, groundwater in the
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
vicinity of the Landfill Property, and the
nearby Fish Cove. The other two cells,
Cells No. 2 and 3, are closed and
monitored by the New York State
Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC), and they are
not included within the NPL Site.
(2) On March 31, 1987, The Town of
Southampton (Town) entered into
Administrative Consent Order pursuant
to CERCLA with EPA. The Order
required the Town to conduct a
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI/FS).
(3) On September 29, 1989 , EPA
issued a Record of Decision for Operable
Unit One (OU 1 ROD) selecting landfill
closure for Cell No. 1 and confirmatory
sampling of the decommissioned septic
sludge lagoons.
(4) EPA and the Town entered into a
Consent Decree in February 1991
regarding the implementation of the
remedy selected in the OU 1 ROD.
(5) On September 28, 1992, EPA
issued a second Record of Decision at
the Site, for Operable Unit 2 (OU 2
ROD), which set forth that no further
action was required concerning
groundwater emanating from the
Landfill Property and extending to Fish
Cove.
(6) Construction was completed in
September 1994 for the OU 1 source
control remedy.
(7) A Preliminary Close Out Report
documenting the completion of the
implementation of the remedy selected
in the OU 1 ROD was issued by EPA on
September 21, 1994.
(8) The deed, access, and well
restrictions required to prevent
exposure to Site contaminants are in
place. The Town, the owner of the
Landfill Property, has placed deed
restrictions on the future use of the
Landfill Property in the property’s deed.
Fencing to restrict access was
determined to be unnecessary because
of a natural border of woodlands around
the Landfill Property, but a fence was
installed at the perimeter of the Cell No.
1 recharge basin. Lastly, Suffolk County
Department of Health helps enforce the
ban on private wells in the vicinity of
the Landfill Property groundwater
plume through implementing its Private
Water Systems standards. All existing
homes have been connected to the
public water service. All new
construction requires a permit from the
Health Department to install a well.
Such permit will not be issued as this
would be in violation of the ban.
(9) The First Five-Year Review for the
Site was completed by EPA on
September 1998, in which EPA
concluded that human health and the
environment are being protected by the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:28 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
remedial action implemented at the
Site.
(10) A Second Five-Year Review was
completed on September 30, 2003, in
which EPA again concluded that human
health and the environment are being
protected by the remedial action
implemented at the Site.
(11) The Town has been conducting
quarterly groundwater monitoring since
December 1998. Monthly gas monitoring
has been performed since January 2002.
(12) Benthic survey investigations
were conducted in September 2001 and
July 2004 by the Town.
(13) Routine operation and
maintenance of the Cell No. 1 capping
system is being performed by the Town.
(14) EPA consulted with the NYSDEC
on the deletion of this Site from the
NPL, and NYSDEC has concurred with
the deletion.
(14) If no significant adverse
comments are received related to this
Direct Final Notice of Deletion, the Site
will be deleted. If significant adverse
comments are received within the 30day public comment period established
for this Direct Final Action or the Notice
of Intent to Delete published in today’s
Federal Register, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this
Direct Final Deletion before its effective
date. EPA will prepare, if appropriate, a
response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of Intent to Delete and the
comments already received.
(15) EPA has placed copies of
documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repositories
identified above.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does
not itself create, alter, or revoke any
individual’s rights or obligations.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
in any way alter EPA’s right to take
enforcement actions, as appropriate.
The NPL is the list of uncontrolled
hazardous substance releases in the
United States that are priorities for longterm remedial evaluation and response.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following summary provides a
brief description of the Site and the
actions taken that provide the basis for
recommending deletion of the Site from
the NPL.
The 131-acre Landfill Property is
located, is owned by the Town. Starting
in 1963, the Landfill Property was used
for the disposal of municipal solid
waste, refuse, and septic system waste.
The Town accepted waste from
residential, industrial, and commercial
sources. Significant features of the
Landfill Property include Cell No. 1,
Cell No. 2, Cell No. 3 and the septic
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43783
sludge lagoons. All three landfill cells
were capped and closed in accordance
with New York State landfill closure
regulations in place at the time. The
septic lagoons, located at the south end
of the property, were excavated and
refilled to grade with sandy loam in
1986. The Site as addressed under the
Federal Superfund Program consists of
Cell No. 1, the decommissioned septic
sludge lagoons, groundwater in the
vicinity of the Landfill Property, and the
nearby Fish Cove. Cells No. 2 and 3 are
closed and monitored by NYSDEC, and
they are not part of the NPL Site.
The Site is located in the Township
of Southampton, even though it is
erroneously listed on the NPL as being
located in North Sea. The property is at
the intersection of Majors Path and Old
Fish Cove Road. The nearest surface
water is Fish Cove, which is located
approximately 1500 feet northwest of
the Landfill Property. Groundwater in
this area ultimately discharges to Fish
Cove, which is an arm of Little Peconic
Bay. The area between Fish Cove and
the Landfill Property is moderately
populated.
In the late 1960’s, a series of 14
scavenger lagoons, approximately 50
feet long, 10 feet deep, 25 feet wide and
50 feet above the water table were
constructed at the southern portion of
the Landfill Property. These septic
sludge lagoons accepted septic system
wastes from both commercial and
residential sources. Sludge was allowed
to drain and dry, and it was
subsequently disposed of in Cell No. 1.
It is estimated that 11 million gallons of
septic wastes were disposed in these
lagoons. The lagoons were
decommissioned in 1985 and most of
their solid and liquid content were
removed. After this removal, an
additional two feet of soil was
excavated. The septic sludge lagoons
were refilled to grade with sandy loam.
A groundwater monitoring program,
initiated by the Town in 1979, revealed
a plume of contamination migrating
from Cell No. 1 to Fish Cove. The plume
contained lead, manganese and
cadmium. A second plume was
discovered originating from the septic
sludge lagoons. The presence of nitrate/
nitrite in this plume indicated the
presence of septic wastes. In addition to
the typical landfill leachate parameters
and heavy metals noted, organics (i.e.,
dichloroethane, tetrachloroethene and
trichloroethene) were also detected in
the groundwater at the Site.
Most of the homes near the Landfill
Property had obtained their drinking
water from wells in the highly
permeable Upper Glacial aquifer. The
detection of contaminated groundwater
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
43784
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
migrating northwest from the Landfill
Property resulted in the closure of
several private domestic wells. Public
water supplies were extended to serve
residents in the affected areas. Based on
the above, Cell No.1 and the septic
sludge lagoons were investigated and
placed on the Superfund NPL in 1986.
As a result of the EPA’s initial efforts to
place the Landfill on the NPL, Cell No.
1 was closed by the Town in 1985. Cell
closure consisted of the following
activities; capping the top, flat portion
of the Cell No. 1 (approximately eight
acres in area) with a 20 mil poly-vinyl
chloride (PVC) membrane to minimize
infiltration, installation of a silty sand
protective layer (approximately two feet
thick) above the membrane, and
placement of a topsoil cover to support
vegetation. The Town also installed a
storm water diversion/collection system
to improve area drainage. The system,
installed along the haul road, included
manholes (which were utilized for inlet
collection), interconnecting piping and
a recharge basin to which all runoff was
routed.
EPA and the Town entered into an
Administrative Order on Consent in
March 1987. Under the Order, the Town
agreed to conduct an RI/FS. The RI/FS
was initiated in August 1987. The OU
1 RI/FS findings indicated that leachate
constituent concentrations were not
decreasing with time. In 1985, prior to
the listing of the Site on the NPL, a cap
had been constructed on Cell No. 1 on
the plateau area only, but it was not
adequate to eliminate leachate
generation. The OU 1 ROD was signed
in September 1989 which addressed,
among other things, any deficiencies in
that capping system.
The OU 1 ROD selected remedy
consisted of the following:
(i) Covering Cell No. 1 with a low
permeability cap while undertaking
action consistent with New York State
(Part 360) sanitary landfill closure
requirements.
(ii) No action at the former septic
sludge lagoons other than confirmatory
sampling.
(iii) Installation of a six-foot high
chain link fence around the Site to
restrict access.
(iv) Deed restrictions on future use of
the Landfill Property.
(v) Long-term operation and
maintenance to provide inspection and
repairs to the Cell No. 1 cap system.
(vi) Long-term air and water quality
monitoring of both the former septic
sludge lagoons and Cell No. 1.
EPA negotiated a Consent Decree with
the Town in which the Town agreed to
implement the remedy set forth in the
OU 1 ROD. The Consent Decree was
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:28 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
entered with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of New
York in August 1990. The capping of
Cell No. 1 utilized the existing 20 mil
PVC liner (previously installed in 1985)
located on the plateau area of the Cell
and involved minor regrading and
capping of the side slopes with a
geomembrane. Approximately 0.5 acres
on the east side slope required capping
with a concrete revetment because the
slope grade was steeper than 33 percent.
The structural regrading of Cell No. 1
included demolition of two concrete
drainage manholes and regrading of the
area to promote overland flow of storm
water. Because access to the 130-acre
Landfill Property is limited as a result
of wooded area which surrounds it, EPA
allowed the perimeter fence to be
eliminated from the design. Instead, the
fence was installed only at the perimeter
of the recharge basin. EPA and NYSDEC
approved the final remedial design in
September 1992.
The Town conducted confirmatory
sludge and soil sampling of the septic
sludge lagoons during January 1992. All
data collected were validated using full
Contract Laboratory Program analytical
and quality assurance/quality control
procedures. The sludge/soil sampling
results confirmed that the ‘‘no action’’
alternative for the septic sludge lagoon
remediation was appropriate. The final
report was approved in September 1992.
EPA and NYSDEC conducted a final
inspection on September 21, 1994.
The Town, which is the owner of the
Landfill Property, has placed deed
restrictions on the future use of the
Landfill Property in the property’s deed.
Lastly, Suffolk County Department of
Health enforces the ban on private wells
in the vicinity of the Landfill Property
groundwater plume through
implementing its Private Water Systems
standards. All existing homes have been
connected to the public water service.
All new construction requires a permit
from the Health Department to install a
well. Such permit will not be issued as
this would be in violation of the ban.
EPA approved a Post-Closure
Monitoring and Maintenance
Operations (O&M) Manual in December
2001. The O&M Manual provides for a
long-term monitoring program for the
cover system, the drainage system, and
the groundwater and the gas-monitoring
systems. The O&M Manual requires
quarterly groundwater monitoring at
selected wells. Quarterly groundwater
sampling has been conducted by the
Town since December 1998. EPA issued
a Remedial Action report on September
28, 1995. O&M monitoring results
indicated that the remedial system
implementing the remedy selected in
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the OU 1 ROD as designed and
constructed was performing
satisfactorily.
For OU 2, the Town installed
additional groundwater monitoring
wells and resampled existing wells at
the Site. NYSDEC collected samples of
hard clams from Fish Cove and
analyzed them for priority pollutant
metals. The results indicated that the
clams did not present a health risks to
consumers. Based on the OU 2 risk
assessment, EPA determined that the
groundwater contamination did not
pose a threat to human health or the
environment. In September 1992, EPA
selected a ‘‘no action’’ remedy for OU 2.
Hazardous substances remain at the
Site above levels that would allow for
unlimited use with unrestricted
exposure. Pursuant to Section 121(c) of
CERCLA, EPA reviews site remedies
where such hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remain no
less often than every five years after the
initiation of a remedy at a site. EPA,
Region 2, has conducted such Five-Year
Reviews of the Site in September 1998
and in September 2003. Both Five-Year
Reviews led EPA to conclude that
human health and the environment are
being protected by the remedial action
implemented at the Site. The next FiveYear Review is scheduled to be
completed before September 2008.
Public participation activities for this
Site have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA § 113(k) and Section 117. As
part of the remedy selection process, the
public was invited to comment on
EPA’s proposed remedies. All other
documents and information which EPA
relied on or considered in
recommending this deletion are
available for the public to review at the
information repositories identified
above.
One of the three criteria for site
deletion is when ‘‘responsible parties or
other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required’’
(40 CFR 300.425(e)(1)(I)). EPA, with the
concurrence of the State of New York
through NYSDEC, have determined that
all required and appropriate response
actions have been implemented.
Therefore, EPA is proposing deletion of
this Site from the NPL.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA with concurrence of the
State of New York, has determined that
all appropriate responses under
CERCLA have been completed, and that
no further response actions, under
CERCLA, other than O&M and five-year
reviews, are necessary. Therefore, EPA
is deleting the Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication. This
action will be effective September 27,
2005 unless EPA receives adverse
comments by August 29, 2005. If
adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of deletion before the
effective date of the deletion and it will
not take effect and, EPA will prepare a
response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will
be no additional opportunity to
comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
PART 300—[AMENDED]
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Natural
resources, Oil pollution, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
I
Dated: July 22, 2005.
George Pavlou,
Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA,
Region 2.
I
40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR
1991 Comp., p. 351; and E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B to Part 300 (Amended)
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300
is amended under New York (NY) by
removing the site name ‘‘North Sea
Municipal Landfill’’ and the
corresponding City/County designation
‘‘North Sea.’’.
I
[FR Doc. 05–15044 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:28 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
43785
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29JYR1.SGM
29JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 145 (Friday, July 29, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43781-43785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-15044]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-7945-9]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
[[Page 43782]]
ACTION: Direct final deletion of the North Sea Municipal Landfill
Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 2, announces
the deletion of the North Sea Municipal Landfill Superfund Site (Site),
located in Southampton, New York, from the National Priorities List
(NPL) and requests public comment on this action. While the Site is
located in Southampton, New York, it is erroneously listed on the NPL
as being located in the City/County of North Sea. The NPL is Appendix B
of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), 40 CFR part 300, which EPA promulgated pursuant to section 105
of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. This Direct Final Notice of
Deletion is being published by EPA with the concurrence of the State of
New York, through the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC). EPA and NYSDEC have determined that responsible
parties or other persons have implemented all appropriate response
actions required to public health or the environment.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be effective September 27, 2005
unless EPA receives significant adverse comments by August 29, 2005. If
significant adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion in the Federal Register,
informing the public that the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: Caroline Kwan,
Remedial Project Manager, Emergency and Remedial Response Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 20th
floor, New York, NY 10007-1866.
Information Repositories: Comprehensive information about the Site
is available for viewing and copying at the Site information
repositories located at: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
2, 290 Broadway, Superfund Record Center, Room 1828, New York, NY
10007-1866. Hours: Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Telephone
No. (212) 637-4308, Southampton College, Reference Department, 239
Montauk Highway, Southampton, New York 11968-4100, Hours: Monday to
Friday till August 12, 2005 from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Closed from August
13 till September 5, reopening on September 6, Monday to Thursday from
10 a.m. to 9 p.m., Saturday: 12 p.m. to 5 p.m., Telephone No. 631-287-
8379, The Rogers Memorial Library (Reference Department), 91 Coopers
Farms Road, Southampton, New York 11968-4002, Hours: Monday to Thursday
from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., Friday: 10 a.m. to 7 p.m., Saturday: 10 a.m. to
5 p.m. , Sunday: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Telephone No. (632) 283-0774.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Caroline Kwan, Remedial Project
Manager, Emergency and Remedial Response Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 20th floor, New York, NY
10007-1866, (212) 637-4275; Fax Number (212) 637-4284; email address:
kwan.caroline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 2 announces the deletion of the North Sea Municipal
Landfill Superfund Site (Site) from the National Priorities List (NPL).
The EPA maintains the NPL as the list of those sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public health or the environment. Sites
on the NPL can have remedial actions financed by the Hazardous
Substance Superfund. As described in Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a
site deleted from the NPL remains eligible for remedial actions if
conditions at the site warrant such action.
EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and routine, and
therefore, EPA is taking it without prior publication of a Notice of
Intent to Delete. This action will be effective September 27, 2005
unless EPA receives significant adverse comments by August 29, 2005 on
this action or on the parallel Notice of Intent to Delete published in
the Notice section of today's Federal Register. If significant adverse
comments are received within the 30-day public comment period of this
action or the Notice of Intent to Delete, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of this Direct Final Deletion before the effective date of
the deletion and the deletion will not take effect. EPA will, if
appropriate, prepare a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the Notice Intent to Delete and the
comments already received. In such a case, there will be no additional
opportunity to comment.
Section II explains the criteria for deleting sites from the NPL.
Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using for this action.
Section IV discusses the Site and demonstrates how it meets the
deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP provides that Sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In accordance
with Sec. 300.425(e)(1), EPA shall consult with the State to determine
whether any of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other parties have implemented all
appropriate response actions required; or,
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed responses under CERCLA have been
implemented, and no further action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
implementing remedial measures is not appropriate.
In addition, the State shall concur with the deletion, as required
by Sec. 300.425(e)(2), and the public shall be informed, as required
by Sec. 300.425(e)(4). A site which is deleted from the NPL does
remain eligible for remedial actions should future conditions warrant
such action, as set forth in Sec. 300.425(e)(3). Even if a site is
deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances, pollutants, or
contaminants remain at the deleted site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, CERCLA section 121(c), 42
U.S.C. 9621(c) requires that a subsequent review of the site be
conducted at least every five years after the initiation of the
remedial action at the deleted site to ensure that the action remains
protective of public health and the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a need for further action, EPA may
initiate remedial actions. Whenever there is a significant release from
a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the
NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Site.
(1) The Site was listed on the NPL in June 1986. The North Sea
Municipal Landfill Property (Landfill Property) includes several former
disposal areas, including landfill cells and former septic sludge
lagoons. The Superfund Site is composed of what was identified as Cell
No.1, the decommissioned septic sludge lagoons, groundwater in the
[[Page 43783]]
vicinity of the Landfill Property, and the nearby Fish Cove. The other
two cells, Cells No. 2 and 3, are closed and monitored by the New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and they are
not included within the NPL Site.
(2) On March 31, 1987, The Town of Southampton (Town) entered into
Administrative Consent Order pursuant to CERCLA with EPA. The Order
required the Town to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI/FS).
(3) On September 29, 1989 , EPA issued a Record of Decision for
Operable Unit One (OU 1 ROD) selecting landfill closure for Cell No. 1
and confirmatory sampling of the decommissioned septic sludge lagoons.
(4) EPA and the Town entered into a Consent Decree in February 1991
regarding the implementation of the remedy selected in the OU 1 ROD.
(5) On September 28, 1992, EPA issued a second Record of Decision
at the Site, for Operable Unit 2 (OU 2 ROD), which set forth that no
further action was required concerning groundwater emanating from the
Landfill Property and extending to Fish Cove.
(6) Construction was completed in September 1994 for the OU 1
source control remedy.
(7) A Preliminary Close Out Report documenting the completion of
the implementation of the remedy selected in the OU 1 ROD was issued by
EPA on September 21, 1994.
(8) The deed, access, and well restrictions required to prevent
exposure to Site contaminants are in place. The Town, the owner of the
Landfill Property, has placed deed restrictions on the future use of
the Landfill Property in the property's deed. Fencing to restrict
access was determined to be unnecessary because of a natural border of
woodlands around the Landfill Property, but a fence was installed at
the perimeter of the Cell No. 1 recharge basin. Lastly, Suffolk County
Department of Health helps enforce the ban on private wells in the
vicinity of the Landfill Property groundwater plume through
implementing its Private Water Systems standards. All existing homes
have been connected to the public water service. All new construction
requires a permit from the Health Department to install a well. Such
permit will not be issued as this would be in violation of the ban.
(9) The First Five-Year Review for the Site was completed by EPA on
September 1998, in which EPA concluded that human health and the
environment are being protected by the remedial action implemented at
the Site.
(10) A Second Five-Year Review was completed on September 30, 2003,
in which EPA again concluded that human health and the environment are
being protected by the remedial action implemented at the Site.
(11) The Town has been conducting quarterly groundwater monitoring
since December 1998. Monthly gas monitoring has been performed since
January 2002.
(12) Benthic survey investigations were conducted in September 2001
and July 2004 by the Town.
(13) Routine operation and maintenance of the Cell No. 1 capping
system is being performed by the Town.
(14) EPA consulted with the NYSDEC on the deletion of this Site
from the NPL, and NYSDEC has concurred with the deletion.
(14) If no significant adverse comments are received related to
this Direct Final Notice of Deletion, the Site will be deleted. If
significant adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period established for this Direct Final Action or the Notice
of Intent to Delete published in today's Federal Register, EPA will
publish a timely notice of withdrawal of this Direct Final Deletion
before its effective date. EPA will prepare, if appropriate, a response
to comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
notice of Intent to Delete and the comments already received.
(15) EPA has placed copies of documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repositories identified above.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's rights or obligations. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is the list of uncontrolled hazardous
substance releases in the United States that are priorities for long-
term remedial evaluation and response.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following summary provides a brief description of the Site and
the actions taken that provide the basis for recommending deletion of
the Site from the NPL.
The 131-acre Landfill Property is located, is owned by the Town.
Starting in 1963, the Landfill Property was used for the disposal of
municipal solid waste, refuse, and septic system waste. The Town
accepted waste from residential, industrial, and commercial sources.
Significant features of the Landfill Property include Cell No. 1, Cell
No. 2, Cell No. 3 and the septic sludge lagoons. All three landfill
cells were capped and closed in accordance with New York State landfill
closure regulations in place at the time. The septic lagoons, located
at the south end of the property, were excavated and refilled to grade
with sandy loam in 1986. The Site as addressed under the Federal
Superfund Program consists of Cell No. 1, the decommissioned septic
sludge lagoons, groundwater in the vicinity of the Landfill Property,
and the nearby Fish Cove. Cells No. 2 and 3 are closed and monitored by
NYSDEC, and they are not part of the NPL Site.
The Site is located in the Township of Southampton, even though it
is erroneously listed on the NPL as being located in North Sea. The
property is at the intersection of Majors Path and Old Fish Cove Road.
The nearest surface water is Fish Cove, which is located approximately
1500 feet northwest of the Landfill Property. Groundwater in this area
ultimately discharges to Fish Cove, which is an arm of Little Peconic
Bay. The area between Fish Cove and the Landfill Property is moderately
populated.
In the late 1960's, a series of 14 scavenger lagoons, approximately
50 feet long, 10 feet deep, 25 feet wide and 50 feet above the water
table were constructed at the southern portion of the Landfill
Property. These septic sludge lagoons accepted septic system wastes
from both commercial and residential sources. Sludge was allowed to
drain and dry, and it was subsequently disposed of in Cell No. 1. It is
estimated that 11 million gallons of septic wastes were disposed in
these lagoons. The lagoons were decommissioned in 1985 and most of
their solid and liquid content were removed. After this removal, an
additional two feet of soil was excavated. The septic sludge lagoons
were refilled to grade with sandy loam.
A groundwater monitoring program, initiated by the Town in 1979,
revealed a plume of contamination migrating from Cell No. 1 to Fish
Cove. The plume contained lead, manganese and cadmium. A second plume
was discovered originating from the septic sludge lagoons. The presence
of nitrate/nitrite in this plume indicated the presence of septic
wastes. In addition to the typical landfill leachate parameters and
heavy metals noted, organics (i.e., dichloroethane, tetrachloroethene
and trichloroethene) were also detected in the groundwater at the Site.
Most of the homes near the Landfill Property had obtained their
drinking water from wells in the highly permeable Upper Glacial
aquifer. The detection of contaminated groundwater
[[Page 43784]]
migrating northwest from the Landfill Property resulted in the closure
of several private domestic wells. Public water supplies were extended
to serve residents in the affected areas. Based on the above, Cell No.1
and the septic sludge lagoons were investigated and placed on the
Superfund NPL in 1986. As a result of the EPA's initial efforts to
place the Landfill on the NPL, Cell No. 1 was closed by the Town in
1985. Cell closure consisted of the following activities; capping the
top, flat portion of the Cell No. 1 (approximately eight acres in area)
with a 20 mil poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) membrane to minimize
infiltration, installation of a silty sand protective layer
(approximately two feet thick) above the membrane, and placement of a
topsoil cover to support vegetation. The Town also installed a storm
water diversion/collection system to improve area drainage. The system,
installed along the haul road, included manholes (which were utilized
for inlet collection), interconnecting piping and a recharge basin to
which all runoff was routed.
EPA and the Town entered into an Administrative Order on Consent in
March 1987. Under the Order, the Town agreed to conduct an RI/FS. The
RI/FS was initiated in August 1987. The OU 1 RI/FS findings indicated
that leachate constituent concentrations were not decreasing with time.
In 1985, prior to the listing of the Site on the NPL, a cap had been
constructed on Cell No. 1 on the plateau area only, but it was not
adequate to eliminate leachate generation. The OU 1 ROD was signed in
September 1989 which addressed, among other things, any deficiencies in
that capping system.
The OU 1 ROD selected remedy consisted of the following:
(i) Covering Cell No. 1 with a low permeability cap while
undertaking action consistent with New York State (Part 360) sanitary
landfill closure requirements.
(ii) No action at the former septic sludge lagoons other than
confirmatory sampling.
(iii) Installation of a six-foot high chain link fence around the
Site to restrict access.
(iv) Deed restrictions on future use of the Landfill Property.
(v) Long-term operation and maintenance to provide inspection and
repairs to the Cell No. 1 cap system.
(vi) Long-term air and water quality monitoring of both the former
septic sludge lagoons and Cell No. 1.
EPA negotiated a Consent Decree with the Town in which the Town
agreed to implement the remedy set forth in the OU 1 ROD. The Consent
Decree was entered with the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of New York in August 1990. The capping of Cell No. 1
utilized the existing 20 mil PVC liner (previously installed in 1985)
located on the plateau area of the Cell and involved minor regrading
and capping of the side slopes with a geomembrane. Approximately 0.5
acres on the east side slope required capping with a concrete revetment
because the slope grade was steeper than 33 percent. The structural
regrading of Cell No. 1 included demolition of two concrete drainage
manholes and regrading of the area to promote overland flow of storm
water. Because access to the 130-acre Landfill Property is limited as a
result of wooded area which surrounds it, EPA allowed the perimeter
fence to be eliminated from the design. Instead, the fence was
installed only at the perimeter of the recharge basin. EPA and NYSDEC
approved the final remedial design in September 1992.
The Town conducted confirmatory sludge and soil sampling of the
septic sludge lagoons during January 1992. All data collected were
validated using full Contract Laboratory Program analytical and quality
assurance/quality control procedures. The sludge/soil sampling results
confirmed that the ``no action'' alternative for the septic sludge
lagoon remediation was appropriate. The final report was approved in
September 1992. EPA and NYSDEC conducted a final inspection on
September 21, 1994.
The Town, which is the owner of the Landfill Property, has placed
deed restrictions on the future use of the Landfill Property in the
property's deed. Lastly, Suffolk County Department of Health enforces
the ban on private wells in the vicinity of the Landfill Property
groundwater plume through implementing its Private Water Systems
standards. All existing homes have been connected to the public water
service. All new construction requires a permit from the Health
Department to install a well. Such permit will not be issued as this
would be in violation of the ban.
EPA approved a Post-Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Operations
(O&M) Manual in December 2001. The O&M Manual provides for a long-term
monitoring program for the cover system, the drainage system, and the
groundwater and the gas-monitoring systems. The O&M Manual requires
quarterly groundwater monitoring at selected wells. Quarterly
groundwater sampling has been conducted by the Town since December
1998. EPA issued a Remedial Action report on September 28, 1995. O&M
monitoring results indicated that the remedial system implementing the
remedy selected in the OU 1 ROD as designed and constructed was
performing satisfactorily.
For OU 2, the Town installed additional groundwater monitoring
wells and resampled existing wells at the Site. NYSDEC collected
samples of hard clams from Fish Cove and analyzed them for priority
pollutant metals. The results indicated that the clams did not present
a health risks to consumers. Based on the OU 2 risk assessment, EPA
determined that the groundwater contamination did not pose a threat to
human health or the environment. In September 1992, EPA selected a ``no
action'' remedy for OU 2.
Hazardous substances remain at the Site above levels that would
allow for unlimited use with unrestricted exposure. Pursuant to Section
121(c) of CERCLA, EPA reviews site remedies where such hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain no less often than every
five years after the initiation of a remedy at a site. EPA, Region 2,
has conducted such Five-Year Reviews of the Site in September 1998 and
in September 2003. Both Five-Year Reviews led EPA to conclude that
human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial
action implemented at the Site. The next Five-Year Review is scheduled
to be completed before September 2008.
Public participation activities for this Site have been satisfied
as required in CERCLA Sec. 113(k) and Section 117. As part of the
remedy selection process, the public was invited to comment on EPA's
proposed remedies. All other documents and information which EPA relied
on or considered in recommending this deletion are available for the
public to review at the information repositories identified above.
One of the three criteria for site deletion is when ``responsible
parties or other persons have implemented all appropriate response
actions required'' (40 CFR 300.425(e)(1)(I)). EPA, with the concurrence
of the State of New York through NYSDEC, have determined that all
required and appropriate response actions have been implemented.
Therefore, EPA is proposing deletion of this Site from the NPL.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA with concurrence of the State of New York, has determined
that all appropriate responses under CERCLA have been completed, and
that no further response actions, under CERCLA, other than O&M and
five-year reviews, are necessary. Therefore, EPA is deleting the Site
from the NPL. Because EPA considers this action to be
[[Page 43785]]
noncontroversial and routine, EPA is taking it without prior
publication. This action will be effective September 27, 2005 unless
EPA receives adverse comments by August 29, 2005. If adverse comments
are received within the 30-day public comment period, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of this direct final notice of deletion before the
effective date of the deletion and it will not take effect and, EPA
will prepare a response to comments and continue with the deletion
process on the basis of the notice of intent to delete and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Natural resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water
supply.
Dated: July 22, 2005.
George Pavlou,
Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA, Region 2.
0
40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR 1991 Comp., p. 351; and E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B to Part 300 (Amended)
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 is amended under New York (NY) by
removing the site name ``North Sea Municipal Landfill'' and the
corresponding City/County designation ``North Sea.''.
[FR Doc. 05-15044 Filed 7-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P