Post-Employment Restrictions for Certain NCUA Examiners, 43800-43802 [05-14808]
Download as PDF
43800
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
provided that such purchases do not
exceed 5 percent (5%) of the
unimpaired capital and surplus of the
purchasing credit union.
[FR Doc. 05–14805 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 796
Post-Employment Restrictions for
Certain NCUA Examiners
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Proposed Changes
NCUA proposes to add a new
part to NCUA’s regulations to
implement new, post-employment
restrictions that will apply to certain
senior NCUA examiners starting
December 17, 2005. The proposed rule
prohibits senior NCUA examiners, for a
year after leaving NCUA employment,
from accepting employment with a
credit union if they had continuing,
broad responsibility for examination of
that credit union for two or more
months during their last 12 months of
NCUA employment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (Please
send comments by one method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web Site: https://
www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/
proposed_regs/proposed_regs. html.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Proposed Rule 796,
Post-Employment Restrictions,’’ in the
e-mail subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina M. Metz, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, at the above address or
telephone (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 17, 2004, Congress enacted
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
the Intelligence Reform Act, Public Law
108–458, creating new, postemployment restrictions for certain
federal employees who examine banks
and credit unions. The law requires
NCUA to prescribe its own regulation
implementing this section for federal
examiners of federally insured credit
unions and consult to the extent it
deems necessary with the federal
banking agencies. NCUA staff has
consulted with their interagency group
so that our proposed rule is consistent
and comparable with the joint notice of
proposed rulemaking the federal
banking agencies are issuing.
The Board is proposing postemployment restrictions for certain
NCUA examiners to implement recent
amendments to the Federal Credit
Union (FCU) Act. Pub. L. 108–458,
§ 6303(c), 118 Stat. 3754 (2004); 12
U.S.C. 1786(w). The post-employment
restrictions will apply to senior
examiners starting December 17, 2005.
For a year after leaving NCUA
employment, senior examiners would
be prohibited from accepting
employment with a federally insured
credit union if they had continuing,
broad responsibility for examination of
that credit union for two or more
months during their last 12 months of
NCUA employment.
The proposed rule implements the
statutory provisions by giving NCUA the
authority to issue administrative orders
removing a person from a position with
a federally insured credit union and
barring further participation with that
credit union or any federally insured
credit union for up to five years. Also,
the proposed rule implements the
statute by imposing civil money
penalties for violations of up to
$250,000.
The proposed rule clarifies the NCUA
employees to whom the restriction will
apply. 12 U.S.C. 1786(w)(3). Congress
intended the one-year post-employment
prohibition to apply to examiners with
a ‘‘meaningful’’ relationship to the
credit union.1 Consistent with that
intent, the proposal defines a ‘‘senior
examiner’’ as an NCUA employee,
commissioned as an examiner, who has
continuing, broad, and lead
responsibility for examining a particular
federally insured credit union, routinely
interacts with officers or employees of
the credit union, and devotes a
substantial portion of his or her time to
1 150 Cong. Rec. S10356 (daily ed. Oct. 4, 2004)
(statement of Sen. Levin).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
supervising or examining that credit
union.
The reference to a ‘‘substantial
portion of time’’ in the definition of
senior examiner is intended to address
the situation in which an NCUA
employee examines or inspects a group
of federally insured credit unions. The
Board believes such an examiner would
be a senior examiner for purposes of the
proposed rule only for those credit
unions to which he or she devotes
substantial time. The Board believes
that an examiner who divides his or her
time across a portfolio of federally
insured credit unions is less likely to
develop a meaningful relationship with
any one credit union. The determination
of whether an examiner devotes a
substantial portion of his or her time is
necessarily case by case.
While the one-year post-employment
restriction can apply by its terms to all
examiners, NCUA expects very few
examiners to actually qualify as senior
examiners. For example, NCUA expects
most examiners in charge will not be
subject to the one-year prohibition. Most
NCUA examiners in charge examine
multiple, federally insured credit
unions in a single year and typically do
not develop a sustained or meaningful
relationship with any one credit union.
Therefore, they would not be considered
senior examiners under the proposal.
Although NCUA expects very few of
its employees will be subject to the
restriction, NCUA anticipates these few
would involve specialty examiners,
such as corporate examiners or problem
case officers. These specialty examiners
are sometimes assigned to be dedicated
to and in residence at a credit union for
an extended period of time. Thus, the
proposed rule includes an example that
an NCUA resident corporate credit
union examiner assigned to work at a
federally insured, corporate credit union
for two or more months during the last
12 months of that individual’s
employment with NCUA will be subject
to the one-year prohibition.
The proposal defines the term
consultant to include individuals who
work directly on matters for, or on
behalf of, a federally insured credit
union. NCUA construes this to mean
that a covered employee may not join a
consulting group and accept an
assignment directly for the credit union
for which he or she served as senior
examiner in two of the last 12 months
of his or her NCUA employment. The
employee, however, may join the
consulting firm as long as he or she does
not directly participate in a matter
involving the relevant credit union.
NCUA requests comment on whether
the meaning of consultant is sufficiently
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
clear and whether there are other terms
NCUA should define.
The proposed rule also implements
the statutory provision authorizing the
NCUA Board to grant waivers if the
NCUA Chairman certifies that granting
the waiver would not affect the integrity
of NCUA’s supervisory program. NCUA
anticipates waivers would involve
highly unusual circumstances. The
Board invites comment on any
provisions of the proposed rule.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact any proposed regulation may
have on a substantial number of small
entities. NCUA considers credit unions
having less than ten million dollars in
assets to be small for purposes of RFA.
Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 87–2 as amended by
IRPS 03–2. The proposal prohibits
senior examiners from accepting
employment with a credit union if they
had continuing, broad responsibility for
examination of that credit union for two
or more months during their last 12
months of NCUA employment. The
NCUA has determined and certifies that
this proposed rule, if adopted, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small credit
unions. Accordingly, the NCUA has
determined that an RFA analysis is not
required. NCUA solicits comment on
this analysis and welcomes any
information that would suggest a
different conclusion.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), NCUA may not conduct or
sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information
collection unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The Board has
determined that the proposed rule does
not contain any information collections
and, therefore, no PRA number is
required.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. It will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this proposal does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
The NCUA has determined that this
proposed rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of
section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999,
Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
Agency Regulatory Goal
NCUA’s goal is to promulgate clear
and understandable regulations that
impose minimal regulatory burden.
NCUA requests comments on whether
the proposed rule is understandable and
minimally intrusive if implemented as
proposed.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 796
Conflicts of interest, Credit unions,
Ethical conduct, Government
employees.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on July 21, 2005.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
Accordingly, NCUA proposes to add a
new 12 CFR part 796 as follows:
PART 796—POST-EMPLOYMENT
RESTRICTIONS FOR CERTAIN NCUA
EXAMINERS
Sec.
796.1 What is the purpose and scope of this
part?
796.2 Who is considered a senior examiner
of the NCUA?
796.3 What special post-employment
restrictions apply to senior examiners?
796.4 When do these special restrictions
become effective and may they be
waived?
796.5 What are the penalties for violating
these special post-employment
restrictions?
796.6 What other definitions and rules of
construction apply for purposes of this
part?
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1786(w).
§ 796.1 What is the purpose and scope of
this part?
This part identifies those National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA)
employees who are subject to the
special, post-employment restrictions in
section 1786(w) of the Act and
implements those restrictions as they
apply to NCUA employees.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43801
§ 796.2 Who is considered a senior
examiner of the NCUA?
For purposes of this part, an NCUA
employee is considered to be the
‘‘senior examiner’’ for a federally
insured credit union if the employee—
(a) Has been commissioned by NCUA
to conduct examinations or inspections
of federally insured credit unions on
behalf of NCUA;
(b) Has continuing, broad, and lead
responsibility for examining or
inspecting that federally insured credit
union;
(c) Routinely interacts with officers or
employees of that federally insured
credit union; and
(d) Devotes a substantial portion of
his or her time to supervising or
examining that federally insured credit
union.
§ 796.3 What special post-employment
restrictions apply to senior examiners?
(a) Senior examiners of federally
insured credit unions. An officer or
employee of the NCUA who serves as
the senior examiner of a federally
insured credit union for two or more
months during the last 12 months of
individual’s employment with NCUA
may not, within one year after leaving
NCUA employment, knowingly accept
compensation as an employee, officer,
director, or consultant from that credit
union.
(b) Example. An NCUA resident
corporate credit union examiner
assigned to work at a federally insured,
corporate credit union for two or more
months during the last 12 months of
that individual’s employment with
NCUA will be subject to the one-year
prohibition of this section.
§ 796.4 When do these special restrictions
become effective and may they be waived?
The post-employment restrictions in
section 1786(w) of the Act and § 796.3
do not apply to any current or former
NCUA employee, if—
(a) The individual ceased to be an
NCUA employee on or before December
17, 2005; or
(b) The Chairman of the NCUA Board
certifies in writing and on a case-by-case
basis that granting the senior examiner
a waiver of the restrictions would not
affect the integrity of the NCUA’s
supervisory program.
§ 796.5 What are the penalties for violating
these special post-employment
restrictions?
(a) Penalties under section 1786(w)(5)
of the Act. An NCUA senior examiner
who violates the post-employment
restrictions set forth in § 796.3 can be—
(1) Removed from participating in the
affairs of the relevant credit union and
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
43802
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 145 / Friday, July 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
prohibited from participating in the
affairs of any federally insured credit
union for a period of up to five years;
and, alternatively, or in addition,
(2) Assessed a civil monetary penalty
of not more than $250,000.
(b) Other penalties. The penalties in
paragraph (a) of this section are not
exclusive, and a senior examiner who
violates the restrictions in § 796.3 also
may be subject to other administrative,
civil, and criminal remedies and
penalties as provided in law.
§ 796.6 What other definitions and rules of
construction apply for purposes of this
part?
For purposes of this part, a person
shall be deemed to act as a ‘‘consultant’’
for a federally insured credit union or
other company only if the person works
directly on matters for, or on behalf of,
such credit union.
[FR Doc. 05–14808 Filed 7–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sulmo Mariano, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 917–6501; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Federal Aviation Administration
Comments Invited
14 CFR Part 39
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Include the
docket number ‘‘FAA–2005–21975;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–122–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
[Docket No. FAA–2005–21975; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–122–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 727 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require revising the
Limitations section of the Airplane
Flight Manual to prohibit resetting a
tripped circuit breaker for a fuel pump.
This proposed AD results from fuel
system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are proposing this AD
to prohibit the resetting of a tripped
circuit breaker for a fuel pump, which
could allow an electrical fault to
override the protective features of the
circuit breaker, and could result in
sparks inside the fuel tank, ignition of
fuel vapors, and consequent fire or
explosion.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 12,
2005.
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Jul 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in
recent fuel tank explosions on several
large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
service history of airplanes subject to
those regulations, and existing
maintenance practices for fuel tank
systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and
Maintenance and Inspection
Requirements’’ (67 FR 23086, May 7,
2001). In addition to new airworthiness
standards for transport airplanes and
new maintenance requirements, this
rule included Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88
requires certain type design (i.e., type
certificate (TC) and supplemental type
certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate
that their fuel tank systems can prevent
ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This
requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered
transport airplanes and for subsequent
modifications to those airplanes. It
requires them to perform design reviews
and to develop design changes and
maintenance procedures if their designs
do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble
to the rule, we intended to adopt
airworthiness directives to mandate any
changes found necessary to address
unsafe conditions identified as a result
of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we
have established four criteria intended
to define the unsafe conditions
associated with fuel tank systems that
require corrective actions. The
percentage of operating time during
which fuel tanks are exposed to
flammable conditions is one of these
criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation:
Single failures, single failures in
combination with another latent
condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the
evaluations included consideration of
E:\FR\FM\29JYP1.SGM
29JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 145 (Friday, July 29, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43800-43802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14808]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 796
Post-Employment Restrictions for Certain NCUA Examiners
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA proposes to add a new part to NCUA's regulations to
implement new, post-employment restrictions that will apply to certain
senior NCUA examiners starting December 17, 2005. The proposed rule
prohibits senior NCUA examiners, for a year after leaving NCUA
employment, from accepting employment with a credit union if they had
continuing, broad responsibility for examination of that credit union
for two or more months during their last 12 months of NCUA employment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(Please send comments by one method only):
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
NCUA Web Site: https://www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/proposed_regs/proposed_regs. html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ``[Your
name] Comments on Proposed Rule 796, Post-Employment Restrictions,'' in
the e-mail subject line.
Fax: (703) 518-6319. Use the subject line described above
for e-mail.
Mail: Address to Mary F. Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina M. Metz, Staff Attorney, Office
of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 17, 2004, Congress enacted the
Intelligence Reform Act, Public Law 108-458, creating new, post-
employment restrictions for certain federal employees who examine banks
and credit unions. The law requires NCUA to prescribe its own
regulation implementing this section for federal examiners of federally
insured credit unions and consult to the extent it deems necessary with
the federal banking agencies. NCUA staff has consulted with their
interagency group so that our proposed rule is consistent and
comparable with the joint notice of proposed rulemaking the federal
banking agencies are issuing.
Proposed Changes
The Board is proposing post-employment restrictions for certain
NCUA examiners to implement recent amendments to the Federal Credit
Union (FCU) Act. Pub. L. 108-458, Sec. 6303(c), 118 Stat. 3754 (2004);
12 U.S.C. 1786(w). The post-employment restrictions will apply to
senior examiners starting December 17, 2005. For a year after leaving
NCUA employment, senior examiners would be prohibited from accepting
employment with a federally insured credit union if they had
continuing, broad responsibility for examination of that credit union
for two or more months during their last 12 months of NCUA employment.
The proposed rule implements the statutory provisions by giving
NCUA the authority to issue administrative orders removing a person
from a position with a federally insured credit union and barring
further participation with that credit union or any federally insured
credit union for up to five years. Also, the proposed rule implements
the statute by imposing civil money penalties for violations of up to
$250,000.
The proposed rule clarifies the NCUA employees to whom the
restriction will apply. 12 U.S.C. 1786(w)(3). Congress intended the
one-year post-employment prohibition to apply to examiners with a
``meaningful'' relationship to the credit union.\1\ Consistent with
that intent, the proposal defines a ``senior examiner'' as an NCUA
employee, commissioned as an examiner, who has continuing, broad, and
lead responsibility for examining a particular federally insured credit
union, routinely interacts with officers or employees of the credit
union, and devotes a substantial portion of his or her time to
supervising or examining that credit union.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 150 Cong. Rec. S10356 (daily ed. Oct. 4, 2004) (statement of
Sen. Levin).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reference to a ``substantial portion of time'' in the
definition of senior examiner is intended to address the situation in
which an NCUA employee examines or inspects a group of federally
insured credit unions. The Board believes such an examiner would be a
senior examiner for purposes of the proposed rule only for those credit
unions to which he or she devotes substantial time. The Board believes
that an examiner who divides his or her time across a portfolio of
federally insured credit unions is less likely to develop a meaningful
relationship with any one credit union. The determination of whether an
examiner devotes a substantial portion of his or her time is
necessarily case by case.
While the one-year post-employment restriction can apply by its
terms to all examiners, NCUA expects very few examiners to actually
qualify as senior examiners. For example, NCUA expects most examiners
in charge will not be subject to the one-year prohibition. Most NCUA
examiners in charge examine multiple, federally insured credit unions
in a single year and typically do not develop a sustained or meaningful
relationship with any one credit union. Therefore, they would not be
considered senior examiners under the proposal.
Although NCUA expects very few of its employees will be subject to
the restriction, NCUA anticipates these few would involve specialty
examiners, such as corporate examiners or problem case officers. These
specialty examiners are sometimes assigned to be dedicated to and in
residence at a credit union for an extended period of time. Thus, the
proposed rule includes an example that an NCUA resident corporate
credit union examiner assigned to work at a federally insured,
corporate credit union for two or more months during the last 12 months
of that individual's employment with NCUA will be subject to the one-
year prohibition.
The proposal defines the term consultant to include individuals who
work directly on matters for, or on behalf of, a federally insured
credit union. NCUA construes this to mean that a covered employee may
not join a consulting group and accept an assignment directly for the
credit union for which he or she served as senior examiner in two of
the last 12 months of his or her NCUA employment. The employee,
however, may join the consulting firm as long as he or she does not
directly participate in a matter involving the relevant credit union.
NCUA requests comment on whether the meaning of consultant is
sufficiently
[[Page 43801]]
clear and whether there are other terms NCUA should define.
The proposed rule also implements the statutory provision
authorizing the NCUA Board to grant waivers if the NCUA Chairman
certifies that granting the waiver would not affect the integrity of
NCUA's supervisory program. NCUA anticipates waivers would involve
highly unusual circumstances. The Board invites comment on any
provisions of the proposed rule.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires NCUA to prepare an
analysis to describe any significant economic impact any proposed
regulation may have on a substantial number of small entities. NCUA
considers credit unions having less than ten million dollars in assets
to be small for purposes of RFA. Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 87-2 as amended by IRPS 03-2. The proposal prohibits
senior examiners from accepting employment with a credit union if they
had continuing, broad responsibility for examination of that credit
union for two or more months during their last 12 months of NCUA
employment. The NCUA has determined and certifies that this proposed
rule, if adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small credit unions. Accordingly, the NCUA has
determined that an RFA analysis is not required. NCUA solicits comment
on this analysis and welcomes any information that would suggest a
different conclusion.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), NCUA may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is
not required to respond to, an information collection unless it
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number. The Board has determined that the proposed rule does
not contain any information collections and, therefore, no PRA number
is required.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order. It will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. NCUA has determined that this
proposal does not constitute a policy that has federalism implications
for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
The NCUA has determined that this proposed rule will not affect
family well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
2681 (1998).
Agency Regulatory Goal
NCUA's goal is to promulgate clear and understandable regulations
that impose minimal regulatory burden. NCUA requests comments on
whether the proposed rule is understandable and minimally intrusive if
implemented as proposed.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 796
Conflicts of interest, Credit unions, Ethical conduct, Government
employees.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on July 21,
2005.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
Accordingly, NCUA proposes to add a new 12 CFR part 796 as follows:
PART 796--POST-EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS FOR CERTAIN NCUA EXAMINERS
Sec.
796.1 What is the purpose and scope of this part?
796.2 Who is considered a senior examiner of the NCUA?
796.3 What special post-employment restrictions apply to senior
examiners?
796.4 When do these special restrictions become effective and may
they be waived?
796.5 What are the penalties for violating these special post-
employment restrictions?
796.6 What other definitions and rules of construction apply for
purposes of this part?
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1786(w).
Sec. 796.1 What is the purpose and scope of this part?
This part identifies those National Credit Union Administration
(NCUA) employees who are subject to the special, post-employment
restrictions in section 1786(w) of the Act and implements those
restrictions as they apply to NCUA employees.
Sec. 796.2 Who is considered a senior examiner of the NCUA?
For purposes of this part, an NCUA employee is considered to be the
``senior examiner'' for a federally insured credit union if the
employee--
(a) Has been commissioned by NCUA to conduct examinations or
inspections of federally insured credit unions on behalf of NCUA;
(b) Has continuing, broad, and lead responsibility for examining or
inspecting that federally insured credit union;
(c) Routinely interacts with officers or employees of that
federally insured credit union; and
(d) Devotes a substantial portion of his or her time to supervising
or examining that federally insured credit union.
Sec. 796.3 What special post-employment restrictions apply to senior
examiners?
(a) Senior examiners of federally insured credit unions. An officer
or employee of the NCUA who serves as the senior examiner of a
federally insured credit union for two or more months during the last
12 months of individual's employment with NCUA may not, within one year
after leaving NCUA employment, knowingly accept compensation as an
employee, officer, director, or consultant from that credit union.
(b) Example. An NCUA resident corporate credit union examiner
assigned to work at a federally insured, corporate credit union for two
or more months during the last 12 months of that individual's
employment with NCUA will be subject to the one-year prohibition of
this section.
Sec. 796.4 When do these special restrictions become effective and
may they be waived?
The post-employment restrictions in section 1786(w) of the Act and
Sec. 796.3 do not apply to any current or former NCUA employee, if--
(a) The individual ceased to be an NCUA employee on or before
December 17, 2005; or
(b) The Chairman of the NCUA Board certifies in writing and on a
case-by-case basis that granting the senior examiner a waiver of the
restrictions would not affect the integrity of the NCUA's supervisory
program.
Sec. 796.5 What are the penalties for violating these special post-
employment restrictions?
(a) Penalties under section 1786(w)(5) of the Act. An NCUA senior
examiner who violates the post-employment restrictions set forth in
Sec. 796.3 can be--
(1) Removed from participating in the affairs of the relevant
credit union and
[[Page 43802]]
prohibited from participating in the affairs of any federally insured
credit union for a period of up to five years; and, alternatively, or
in addition,
(2) Assessed a civil monetary penalty of not more than $250,000.
(b) Other penalties. The penalties in paragraph (a) of this section
are not exclusive, and a senior examiner who violates the restrictions
in Sec. 796.3 also may be subject to other administrative, civil, and
criminal remedies and penalties as provided in law.
Sec. 796.6 What other definitions and rules of construction apply for
purposes of this part?
For purposes of this part, a person shall be deemed to act as a
``consultant'' for a federally insured credit union or other company
only if the person works directly on matters for, or on behalf of, such
credit union.
[FR Doc. 05-14808 Filed 7-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P