FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Exemption, 43719-43721 [E5-4012]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 144 / Thursday, July 28, 2005 / Notices
II. Review Focus: The Department of
Labor is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions: The Department
of Labor seeks the approval of the
extension of this information collection
in order to carry out its responsibility to
meet the statutory requirements to
ensure payment of compensation or
death benefits under the Act.
Type of Review: Extension.
Agency: Employment Standards
Administration.
Titles: Notice of Controversion of
Right to Compensation.
OMB Number: 1215–0023.
Agency Numbers: LS–207.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Total Respondents: 750.
Total Annual Responses: 15,750.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 3,938.
Estimated Time Per Response: 15
minutes.
Frequency: On occasion.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $7,011.00.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: July 21, 2005.
Bruce Bohanon,
Chief, Branch of Management Review and
Internal Control, Division of Financial
Management, Office of Management,
Administration and Planning, Employment
Standards Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–14903 Filed 7–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CF–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:40 Jul 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–346]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station, Unit 1; Exemption
1.0
Background
The FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company (FENOC or the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License No.
NPF–3, which authorizes operation of
the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,
Unit 1 (DBNPS). The license provides,
among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a pressurizedwater reactor located in Ottawa County,
Ohio.
2.0
Request
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, appendix
R, ‘‘Fire Protection Program for Nuclear
Power Facilities Operating Prior to
January 1, 1979,’’ establishes fire
protection requirements to satisfy 10
CFR part 50, appendix A, General
Design Criterion No. 3, ‘‘Fire
Protection.’’ By letter dated January 20,
2004 (ADAMS ML040220470), as
supplemented by letters dated
September 3, 2004 (ADAMS
ML042520326), and February 25, 2005
(ADAMS ML050610249), FENOC
requested an exemption from Appendix
R, Section III.G.3, ‘‘Fire Protection of
Safe Shutdown Capability.’’
The licensee is requesting an
exemption from the requirements of
Section III.G.3 to provide area-wide fire
detection and fixed fire suppression in
Fire Area HH. Control room emergency
ventilation systems are routed through
Fire Area HH in the auxiliary building.
Fire Area HH is equipped with a fire
detection system (covering
approximately 96 percent of Fire Area
HH), but no fixed suppression system is
installed.
In summary, FENOC has requested an
exemption from the 10 CFR Part 50,
Appendix R, Section III.G.3 requirement
for a fixed fire suppression system in
Fire Area HH and for fire detection in
the approximately 4 percent of Fire Area
HH not equipped with a fire detection
system.
3.0
Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43719
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 when (1)
the exemptions are authorized by law,
will not present an undue risk to public
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are
present. These special circumstances are
described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), in
that the application of these regulations
in this circumstance is not necessary to
achieve the underlying purpose of the
regulations.
The underlying purpose of appendix
R, section III.G, is to provide features
capable of limiting fire damage so that:
(1) One train of systems necessary to
achieve and maintain hot shutdown
conditions from either the control room
or emergency control station(s) is free of
fire damage; and (2) systems necessary
to achieve and maintain cold shutdown
from either the control room or
emergency control station(s) can be
repaired within 72 hours.
Fire Area HH consists of the Air
Conditioning (A/C) Equipment Room
(Room 603), the Records and Storage
Area (Room 603A), and Vestibule (Room
603B). Room 603 consists of
approximately 3,150 square feet of floor
area, with an in situ combustible
loading consisting of cable insulation;
heating, ventilation and air conditioning
(HVAC) duct insulation; and small
quantities of grease, lube oil, and
miscellaneous combustibles.
Combustibles are located throughout the
room, and in proximity to the cables of
interest. Rooms 603A and 603B do not
contain combustibles or equipment.
Existing fire protection capability in
the area consists of a fire detection
system that protects the A/C Equipment
Room (Room 603) and manual (not
fixed) fire suppression capability
consisting of portable fire extinguishers
and standpipe hose stations for the
protection of the entire area. Rooms
603A and 603B are not equipped with
detection. Room 603A is separated from
Room 603 by a 12-inch thick concrete
masonry unit wall and a Underwriters
Laboratory Class B fire door with a
louvered opening. Room 603A is no
longer used as a records storage area.
The louvered opening is equipped with
a fire damper held open by a fusible
link. The door is normally locked and
placarded with a sign that states,
‘‘Storage of Any Kind is Forbidden’’ and
‘‘Door Must Remain Locked.’’ Room
603B is a vestibule separated from Room
603 by a 2-hour rated barrier.
Fire Area HH has 3-hour rated fire
barriers on the walls and floors. The fire
barrier between Room 603 and the
stairwell and elevator, Fire Area UU, is
2-hour rated. All cables are within
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
43720
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 144 / Thursday, July 28, 2005 / Notices
conduit or cabinets. There are no cable
trays in Area HH.
Fire damage to the circuits for the
Control Room Emergency Ventilation
System (CREVS) in Fire Area HH could
disable the Control Room HVAC.
The installed ionization smoke
detection system will alert the Control
Room operators to summon the fire
brigade to respond and manually
extinguish the fire. Standpipe hose
stations are available to the fire brigade.
No combustibles are stored in Rooms
603A and 603B, and these rooms are
separated from Room 603, therefore a
fire in Room 603A or 603B is not
expected to damage the cables of
interest.
FENOC performed an analysis to
determine the impact of a fire in Fire
Area HH. For example, assuming a
500kW fire in Room 603, the room
would not exceed 250 °F for at least 20
minutes. Even with this relatively large
fire size for the equipment in the room,
the room temperature would not be high
enough to cause area-wide cable
damage. Also, 20 minutes would
provide time for the fire brigade to
respond to the fire alarm that would
annunciate in the control room. The 20minute response time allows 5 minutes
for the detection system to actuate and
15 minutes for the fire brigade to
respond.
FENOC verified that a number of the
motor control centers in Room 603 were
remote from the cables of interest and
therefore, would not be expected to
impact them. Other combustible sources
were considered to cause damage to the
cables of interest and are discussed in
the risk analysis.
A floor drain is provided in Room
603. Based on the configuration of the
room, it is expected that if any of the
combustible liquids leak from their
enclosures the liquids would flow to the
floor drain and not flow to below the
circuits of interest, where if ignited,
could cause a fire that would impact the
cables of interest.
Loss of the Control Room HVAC is not
expected to have an immediate effect on
the ability to shutdown the plant from
the Control Room. With no reduction in
Control Room heat load, FENOC
calculated that it will take 30 minutes
before the Control Room will reach a
temperature of 105 °F. Although
procedural guidance to mitigate a
temporary loss of HVAC is provided
(i.e., by reducing the Control Room heat
load), the operators may need to or
choose to abandon the Control Room
due to high temperatures.
FENOC has identified a few pinch
points where a single fire could
potentially fail both trains of CREVS
circuits. These pinch points are in the
area near the C6714 and C6715 cabinets,
around C6705 cabinet, and a transient
fire affecting the CREVS controls and
×
Fire frequency
8.25E–5/year .........................................................................................................
This value is the frequency that a fire
in the area may challenge safe
shutdown. The value may be smaller
(for example, this value does not take
credit for manual suppression). FENOC
also provides the overall core-damage
frequency for DBNPS as 1.2E–5/year.
The NRC staff examined the licensee’s
submittals to determine if the
configuration in Fire Area HH would
meet the underlying purpose of the rule,
10 CFR part 50, appendix R. The NRC
staff has compared the configuration to
the three defense-in-depth elements
described in 10 CFR part 50, appendix
R:
1. To prevent fires from starting,
2. To detect rapidly, control, and
extinguish promptly those fires that do
occur, and
3. To provide protection for
structures, systems and components
important to safety so that a fire that is
not promptly extinguished by the fire
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:40 Jul 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
Fail to shed
heat loads
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
×
Fail to shutdown from alt.
shutdown
panel
5E–2
suppression activities will not prevent
the safe shutdown of the plant.
The combustibles and ignition
sources in Fire Area HH are limited to
those expected in an area of this type.
The licensee has control over transient
combustibles and hot work performed
in this area. Combustible liquids are
installed within equipment, and cables
are installed within cabinets and
conduits; no cable trays are installed in
the area. According to the licensee’s
analysis, if the combustible liquids were
to escape their enclosure, they would
flow to the floor drain and not to an area
of Room 603 where, if ignited, could
affect the cables of interest. There is
substantial separation (2-hour rated
barriers) between this area and other
exposing fire areas.
Room 603 is equipped with an
ionization smoke detection system
which annunciates to the control room
PO 00000
compressors located in Room 603. Since
the room configuration does not assure
that safe shutdown will not be
challenged, the licensee has performed
a risk analysis to determine the
probability that the existing
configuration will challenge safe
shutdown as discussed below.
Alternate shutdown capability can be
provided by evacuating the Control
Room and shutting down the plant from
the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel. Plant
procedures include instructions for
these manual operator actions if Control
Room cooling is disabled.
The licensee performed a risk analysis
of Room 603, and determined that the
fire frequency of fires that could impact
the CREVS is 8.25E–5/year. The risk
analysis also estimates the likelihood
that the Control Room operators would
fail to take actions to shed Control Room
heating loads in order to keep the
Control Room habitable. This
conditional probability of failure to shed
control room heat loads was evaluated
as 0.05 (5E–2). The risk analysis also
estimates the likelihood that safe
shutdown would fail if a fire affecting
the CREVS required control room
evacuation. This conditional probability
was calculated to be 0.079 (7.9E–2).
Therefore, the probability that both the
CREVS cables would be damaged by a
fire and the mitigation from outside the
control room would fail would be:
7.9E–2
=
Total
3.3.E–7/year
for rapid plant response. The other
rooms, 603A and 603B, do not contain
combustibles and are separated from
Room 603, and therefore are not
considered to be an ignition source that
could damage the cables of interest. In
the unusual event that a fire did occur
in either Room 603A or 603B, it is
expected that the fire detectors in Room
603 would actuate. Fire suppression
equipment (hose stations and fire
extinguishers) are available for
suppression of a fire were it to occur.
Based on the room size and expected
fire types, a fire creating a hot layer that
causes area wide damage is not
expected.
The licensee identified combustibles
and pinch points in Fire Area HH.
These may be subjected to fires in the
area, which could challenge safe
shutdown. FENOC states that there are
only a few pinch points and only a few
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 144 / Thursday, July 28, 2005 / Notices
fire hazards that could affect the pinch
points. Although it is unlikely that a fire
will affect the pinch points, if such
damage were to occur and the CREVS
was to be made inoperable, means to
achieve safe shutdown remain available.
First, the operators could shed loads to
reduce the heat load in the Control
Room so that Control Room
abandonment is not required. Secondly,
if Control Room abandonment is
required, the alternate shutdown panel
is available to shutdown the plant. The
licensee performed a risk analysis of
these configurations which is described
above.
The risk analysis in the February 25,
2005, submittal is generally consistent
with the NRC’s fire protection
significance determination process
(Inspection Manual Chapter 0609,
Appendix F). The results of the analysis
are consistent with a change that would
be acceptable when compared to the
acceptance criteria described in
Regulatory Guide 1.174, ‘‘An Approach
for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment
in Risk-Informed Decisions on PlantSpecific Changes to the Licensing
Basis,’’ Revision 1.
The evaluation that FENOC prepared
assesses the impact of the change. This
evaluation uses a combination of riskinsights and deterministic methods to
show that sufficient safety margins are
maintained.
The NRC staff examined the licensee’s
rationale to support the exemption
request and concluded that adequate
defense-in-depth and safety margins
exist. Although fixed suppression is not
installed in the area, the configuration
of the area makes it unlikely that the
cables of interest will be damaged by a
fire in the area. Also, if the cables of
interest are damaged, adequate
assurance remains to demonstrate that
the plant can be brought to a safe
shutdown condition.
Based upon the above, the NRC staff
concludes that application of the
regulation is not necessary to achieve
the underlying purpose of the rule.
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), the
requested exemption is acceptable.
5.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants FENOC
an exemption from the requirements of
10 CFR part 50, appendix R, section
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:40 Jul 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
III.G.3 to install a fixed fire suppression
system in Fire Area HH for DBNPS and
to install fire detection in the
approximately 4 percent of Fire Area
HH (i.e., Rooms 603A and 603B) not
currently covered by a fire detection
system. This exemption is based on the
limited combustibles located in the fire
area (including no storage of
combustibles in Rooms 603A and 603B),
the limited ignition sources in the fire
area, administrative controls on both
transient combustibles and hot work,
the configuration of Room 603 that
avoids in-situ combustible liquids from
affecting the cables of interest, the fire
detection and manual suppression
capability available, and the availability
of alternate means to achieve shutdown
if a fire were to occur and cause damage
to the cables of interest.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (70 FR 42112).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 21 day
of July 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Ledyard B. Marsh,
Director, Division of Licensing Project
Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5–4012 Filed 7–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[Docket No. 55–22685; ASLBP No. 05–840–
01–SP]
In the Matter of David H. Hawes;
Establishment of Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the
Commission dated December 29, 1972,
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR
28,710 (1972), and the Commission’s
regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300,
2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321,
notice is hereby given that an Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board is being
established to preside over the following
proceeding:
David H. Hawes (Reactor Operator
License for Vogtle Electric Generating
Plant)
This proceeding concerns a request
for hearing submitted on June 28, 2005,
by David H. Hawes in response to a June
20, 2005, NRC staff letter proposing the
denial of his application for a reactor
operator license for the Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant. According to the staff
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
letter, the basis for the proposed denial
action was Mr. Hawe’s failure to obtain
a passing grade on the May 27, 2005,
written examination portion of his
reactor operator license application for
the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.
The Board is comprised of the
following administrative judges:
Ann M. Young, Chair, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
Michael C. Farrar, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
Dr. Peter S. Lam, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall be filed with the
administrative judges in accordance
with 10 CFR 2.302.
Issued in Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
day of July, 2005.
G. Paul Bollwerk, III,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E5–4010 Filed 7–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Announcement of a Public Meeting To
Discuss Selected Topics for the
Review of Emergency Preparedness
(EP) Regulations and Guidance for
Commercial Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
PO 00000
43721
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission’s (NRC’s) reassessment of
emergency preparedness following
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks
concluded that the planning basis for
emergency preparedness (EP) remains
valid. However, as part of our
continuing EP review, some
enhancements are being considered to
EP regulations and guidance due to the
terrorist acts of 9/11; technological
advances; the need for clarification
based upon more than 20 years of
experience; lessons learned during drills
and exercises; and responses to actual
events.
Therefore, the NRC will hold a one
and one-half-day public meeting to
obtain stakeholder input on selected
topics for the review of EP regulations
and guidance for commercial nuclear
power plants and to discuss EP-related
issues that arose during an NRC/FEMA
workshop at the 2005 National
Radiological Emergency Preparedness
(NREP) Conference.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 144 (Thursday, July 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43719-43721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4012]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-346]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station, Unit 1; Exemption
1.0 Background
The FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the licensee)
is the holder of Facility Operating License No. NPF-3, which authorizes
operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS). The
license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to
all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a pressurized-water reactor located in
Ottawa County, Ohio.
2.0 Request
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50,
appendix R, ``Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities
Operating Prior to January 1, 1979,'' establishes fire protection
requirements to satisfy 10 CFR part 50, appendix A, General Design
Criterion No. 3, ``Fire Protection.'' By letter dated January 20, 2004
(ADAMS ML040220470), as supplemented by letters dated September 3, 2004
(ADAMS ML042520326), and February 25, 2005 (ADAMS ML050610249), FENOC
requested an exemption from Appendix R, Section III.G.3, ``Fire
Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability.''
The licensee is requesting an exemption from the requirements of
Section III.G.3 to provide area-wide fire detection and fixed fire
suppression in Fire Area HH. Control room emergency ventilation systems
are routed through Fire Area HH in the auxiliary building. Fire Area HH
is equipped with a fire detection system (covering approximately 96
percent of Fire Area HH), but no fixed suppression system is installed.
In summary, FENOC has requested an exemption from the 10 CFR Part
50, Appendix R, Section III.G.3 requirement for a fixed fire
suppression system in Fire Area HH and for fire detection in the
approximately 4 percent of Fire Area HH not equipped with a fire
detection system.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the Commission may, upon application
by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 when (1) the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present. These special circumstances
are described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), in that the application of
these regulations in this circumstance is not necessary to achieve the
underlying purpose of the regulations.
The underlying purpose of appendix R, section III.G, is to provide
features capable of limiting fire damage so that: (1) One train of
systems necessary to achieve and maintain hot shutdown conditions from
either the control room or emergency control station(s) is free of fire
damage; and (2) systems necessary to achieve and maintain cold shutdown
from either the control room or emergency control station(s) can be
repaired within 72 hours.
Fire Area HH consists of the Air Conditioning (A/C) Equipment Room
(Room 603), the Records and Storage Area (Room 603A), and Vestibule
(Room 603B). Room 603 consists of approximately 3,150 square feet of
floor area, with an in situ combustible loading consisting of cable
insulation; heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) duct
insulation; and small quantities of grease, lube oil, and miscellaneous
combustibles. Combustibles are located throughout the room, and in
proximity to the cables of interest. Rooms 603A and 603B do not contain
combustibles or equipment.
Existing fire protection capability in the area consists of a fire
detection system that protects the A/C Equipment Room (Room 603) and
manual (not fixed) fire suppression capability consisting of portable
fire extinguishers and standpipe hose stations for the protection of
the entire area. Rooms 603A and 603B are not equipped with detection.
Room 603A is separated from Room 603 by a 12-inch thick concrete
masonry unit wall and a Underwriters Laboratory Class B fire door with
a louvered opening. Room 603A is no longer used as a records storage
area. The louvered opening is equipped with a fire damper held open by
a fusible link. The door is normally locked and placarded with a sign
that states, ``Storage of Any Kind is Forbidden'' and ``Door Must
Remain Locked.'' Room 603B is a vestibule separated from Room 603 by a
2-hour rated barrier.
Fire Area HH has 3-hour rated fire barriers on the walls and
floors. The fire barrier between Room 603 and the stairwell and
elevator, Fire Area UU, is 2-hour rated. All cables are within
[[Page 43720]]
conduit or cabinets. There are no cable trays in Area HH.
Fire damage to the circuits for the Control Room Emergency
Ventilation System (CREVS) in Fire Area HH could disable the Control
Room HVAC.
The installed ionization smoke detection system will alert the
Control Room operators to summon the fire brigade to respond and
manually extinguish the fire. Standpipe hose stations are available to
the fire brigade. No combustibles are stored in Rooms 603A and 603B,
and these rooms are separated from Room 603, therefore a fire in Room
603A or 603B is not expected to damage the cables of interest.
FENOC performed an analysis to determine the impact of a fire in
Fire Area HH. For example, assuming a 500kW fire in Room 603, the room
would not exceed 250 [deg]F for at least 20 minutes. Even with this
relatively large fire size for the equipment in the room, the room
temperature would not be high enough to cause area-wide cable damage.
Also, 20 minutes would provide time for the fire brigade to respond to
the fire alarm that would annunciate in the control room. The 20-minute
response time allows 5 minutes for the detection system to actuate and
15 minutes for the fire brigade to respond.
FENOC verified that a number of the motor control centers in Room
603 were remote from the cables of interest and therefore, would not be
expected to impact them. Other combustible sources were considered to
cause damage to the cables of interest and are discussed in the risk
analysis.
A floor drain is provided in Room 603. Based on the configuration
of the room, it is expected that if any of the combustible liquids leak
from their enclosures the liquids would flow to the floor drain and not
flow to below the circuits of interest, where if ignited, could cause a
fire that would impact the cables of interest.
Loss of the Control Room HVAC is not expected to have an immediate
effect on the ability to shutdown the plant from the Control Room. With
no reduction in Control Room heat load, FENOC calculated that it will
take 30 minutes before the Control Room will reach a temperature of 105
[deg]F. Although procedural guidance to mitigate a temporary loss of
HVAC is provided (i.e., by reducing the Control Room heat load), the
operators may need to or choose to abandon the Control Room due to high
temperatures.
FENOC has identified a few pinch points where a single fire could
potentially fail both trains of CREVS circuits. These pinch points are
in the area near the C6714 and C6715 cabinets, around C6705 cabinet,
and a transient fire affecting the CREVS controls and compressors
located in Room 603. Since the room configuration does not assure that
safe shutdown will not be challenged, the licensee has performed a risk
analysis to determine the probability that the existing configuration
will challenge safe shutdown as discussed below.
Alternate shutdown capability can be provided by evacuating the
Control Room and shutting down the plant from the Auxiliary Shutdown
Panel. Plant procedures include instructions for these manual operator
actions if Control Room cooling is disabled.
The licensee performed a risk analysis of Room 603, and determined
that the fire frequency of fires that could impact the CREVS is 8.25E-
5/year. The risk analysis also estimates the likelihood that the
Control Room operators would fail to take actions to shed Control Room
heating loads in order to keep the Control Room habitable. This
conditional probability of failure to shed control room heat loads was
evaluated as 0.05 (5E-2). The risk analysis also estimates the
likelihood that safe shutdown would fail if a fire affecting the CREVS
required control room evacuation. This conditional probability was
calculated to be 0.079 (7.9E-2). Therefore, the probability that both
the CREVS cables would be damaged by a fire and the mitigation from
outside the control room would fail would be:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fail to
Fail to shed shutdown from
Fire frequency x heat loads x alt. shutdown = Total
panel
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.25E-5/year..................................... .. 5E-2 .. 7.9E-2 .. 3.3.E-7/year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This value is the frequency that a fire in the area may challenge
safe shutdown. The value may be smaller (for example, this value does
not take credit for manual suppression). FENOC also provides the
overall core-damage frequency for DBNPS as 1.2E-5/year.
The NRC staff examined the licensee's submittals to determine if
the configuration in Fire Area HH would meet the underlying purpose of
the rule, 10 CFR part 50, appendix R. The NRC staff has compared the
configuration to the three defense-in-depth elements described in 10
CFR part 50, appendix R:
1. To prevent fires from starting,
2. To detect rapidly, control, and extinguish promptly those fires
that do occur, and
3. To provide protection for structures, systems and components
important to safety so that a fire that is not promptly extinguished by
the fire suppression activities will not prevent the safe shutdown of
the plant.
The combustibles and ignition sources in Fire Area HH are limited
to those expected in an area of this type. The licensee has control
over transient combustibles and hot work performed in this area.
Combustible liquids are installed within equipment, and cables are
installed within cabinets and conduits; no cable trays are installed in
the area. According to the licensee's analysis, if the combustible
liquids were to escape their enclosure, they would flow to the floor
drain and not to an area of Room 603 where, if ignited, could affect
the cables of interest. There is substantial separation (2-hour rated
barriers) between this area and other exposing fire areas.
Room 603 is equipped with an ionization smoke detection system
which annunciates to the control room for rapid plant response. The
other rooms, 603A and 603B, do not contain combustibles and are
separated from Room 603, and therefore are not considered to be an
ignition source that could damage the cables of interest. In the
unusual event that a fire did occur in either Room 603A or 603B, it is
expected that the fire detectors in Room 603 would actuate. Fire
suppression equipment (hose stations and fire extinguishers) are
available for suppression of a fire were it to occur.
Based on the room size and expected fire types, a fire creating a
hot layer that causes area wide damage is not expected.
The licensee identified combustibles and pinch points in Fire Area
HH. These may be subjected to fires in the area, which could challenge
safe shutdown. FENOC states that there are only a few pinch points and
only a few
[[Page 43721]]
fire hazards that could affect the pinch points. Although it is
unlikely that a fire will affect the pinch points, if such damage were
to occur and the CREVS was to be made inoperable, means to achieve safe
shutdown remain available. First, the operators could shed loads to
reduce the heat load in the Control Room so that Control Room
abandonment is not required. Secondly, if Control Room abandonment is
required, the alternate shutdown panel is available to shutdown the
plant. The licensee performed a risk analysis of these configurations
which is described above.
The risk analysis in the February 25, 2005, submittal is generally
consistent with the NRC's fire protection significance determination
process (Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix F). The results of
the analysis are consistent with a change that would be acceptable when
compared to the acceptance criteria described in Regulatory Guide
1.174, ``An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-
Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis,''
Revision 1.
The evaluation that FENOC prepared assesses the impact of the
change. This evaluation uses a combination of risk-insights and
deterministic methods to show that sufficient safety margins are
maintained.
The NRC staff examined the licensee's rationale to support the
exemption request and concluded that adequate defense-in-depth and
safety margins exist. Although fixed suppression is not installed in
the area, the configuration of the area makes it unlikely that the
cables of interest will be damaged by a fire in the area. Also, if the
cables of interest are damaged, adequate assurance remains to
demonstrate that the plant can be brought to a safe shutdown condition.
Based upon the above, the NRC staff concludes that application of
the regulation is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of
the rule. Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), the requested exemption is acceptable.
5.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common
defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants FENOC an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50, appendix R, section III.G.3 to install
a fixed fire suppression system in Fire Area HH for DBNPS and to
install fire detection in the approximately 4 percent of Fire Area HH
(i.e., Rooms 603A and 603B) not currently covered by a fire detection
system. This exemption is based on the limited combustibles located in
the fire area (including no storage of combustibles in Rooms 603A and
603B), the limited ignition sources in the fire area, administrative
controls on both transient combustibles and hot work, the configuration
of Room 603 that avoids in-situ combustible liquids from affecting the
cables of interest, the fire detection and manual suppression
capability available, and the availability of alternate means to
achieve shutdown if a fire were to occur and cause damage to the cables
of interest.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment (70 FR 42112).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 21 day of July 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Ledyard B. Marsh,
Director, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5-4012 Filed 7-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P