Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, 43446-43448 [05-14796]
Download as PDF
43446
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Notices
management approach through
improved biological monitoring.
Alternative B would best support the
purpose for which the refuge was
established.
The refuge would be managed with an
active hands-on, labor intensive
approach. The refuge would intensely
manage up to 1,500 acres of early
successional wetlands. Succession
would be controlled with more
aggressive drawdown cycles, more
frequent soil disturbance, and by
implementing a more focused fire
management program. Public use
opportunities would generally increase
under this alternative but hunting and
fishing opportunities would remain at
the same level that is currently
occurring with the exception of rabbit
hunting. Facilities such as trails,
boardwalks, observation platforms, and
photography blinds would be improved.
The refuge would increase its emphasis
on environmental education and
interpretation.
Archery hunting for resident deer
would continue to manage populations
and provide hunting opportunities for
archers. Snipe and dove hunting would
continue. A lottery waterfowl hunt
would be allowed for youth with
parental or guardian supervision. The
purpose of the youth hunt is to provide
opportunities for public access to
waterfowl hunting because these
opportunities are limited state-wide and
would introduce young hunters to a safe
controlled hunting environment. The
experimental rabbit hunt would be
discontinued due to declining public
interest and conflicting management
activities. Habitat that is managed for
wintering waterfowl is not favorable for
a quality rabbit hunt and harvest.
Commercial alligator harvest would
continue in cooperation with Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
and would be by lottery only.
Commercial guides for wildlife viewing,
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation would be
permitted. Existing fishing areas on the
refuge would be improved. Research
and monitoring would be enhanced.
Programs that promote the beneficial
use of dredge material would be
allowed. Current partnerships that assist
the refuge in accomplishing its
conservation objectives would continue
under this alternative, however, the
refuge would strive to develop new
partnerships with conservation groups
and state agencies. Communication with
local landowners and community
groups would continue in order to
promote wildlife conservation and the
National Wildlife Refuge System. A
more aggressive approach to removal of
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:01 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
undesirable plants and animals would
be implemented. Cultural resources
would continue to be protected and
interpretation of cultural resources
would be improved.
Under Alternative C, the refuge would
degrade all levees to an extent defined
as the ‘‘neareast marsh elevation found
in the area.’’ The refuge would then be
in custodial form. No active habitat
management would be applied. Staff
would serve as caretakers of the refuge,
observing and monitoring the natural
forces and ecological succession that
would shape its habitats and effectively
determine their suitability for wildlife.
Water management capability would
cease and no mechanical or prescribed
fire disturbances would occur. Use of
fire would be limited to hazardous fuel
reduction and suppression of wildfires.
Removal of undesirable plants and
animals would be minimal. Enjoyment
of opportunities for public use may
decline because wildlife diversity and
abundance may be reduced under this
alternative. Cultural resources would
continue to be protected and
interpretation of cultural resources
would be improved.
Actions Common to All Alternatives
All three alternatives share the
following management concepts and
techniques for achieving the goals of the
refuge:
• Protecting a variety of freshwater
marsh and upland prairie habitat;
• Serving as a critical resting area for
waterfowl in a heavily hunted area;
• Establishing, maintaining, and
improving partnerships with
landowners and local, state, and Federal
agencies and organizations;
• Coordinating management actions
with local and state land and resource
managment agencies; and
• Encouraging scientific research on
the refuge.
DATES: An Open House will be held at
the refuge on August 18, 2005, from 2
p.m. to 7 p.m. to present the plan to the
public. The refuge headquarters is
located at 1428 Highway 27, Bell City,
Louisiana. Individuals wishing to
comment on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Cameron Prairie
National Wildlife Refuge should do so
no later than September 12, 2005. Public
comments were requested, considered,
and incorporated throughout the
planning process. Public outreach has
included public scoping meetings,
technical workgroups, planning
updates, and a Federal Register notice.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Environmental Assessment should
be addressed to Judy McClendon,
Natural Resource Planner, Southwest
Louisiana National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, Cameron Prairie National
Wildlife Refuge, 1428 Highway 27, Bell
City, Louisiana 70630; Telephone
337/598–2216; Fax 337/598–2492.
Comments on the draft may be sumitted
to the above address or via electronic
mail to judy_mcclendon@fws.gov.
Please include your name and return
address in your internet message. Our
practice is to make comments, including
names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from
the record, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Cameron
Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, located
in southwestern Louisiana, consists of
9,621 acres of freshwater marsh, coastal
prairie, and early successional wetlands,
and is managed to preserve and protect
wintering waterfowl and their habitat.
Cameron Prairie is one of three refuges
comprising the Southwest Louisiana
National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
Annually, about 30,000 visitors
participate in refuge activities,
including recreational fishing,
recreational hunting, wildlife
photography, wildlife observation, and
environmental education and
interpretation.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: January 6, 2004.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial note:
This document was received at the Office
of the Federal Register July 22, 2005.
[FR Doc. 05–14785 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment for
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
in Sebastian, Florida.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service
announces that a Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Notices
Assessment for Pelican Island National
Wildlife Refuge are available for review
and comment. The National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires the Service to
develop a comprehensive conservation
plan for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose in developing a
comprehensive conservation plan is to
provide refuge managers with 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitat, plans identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment should
be addressed to Mr. Paul Tritaik, Refuge
Manager, Pelican Island National
Wildlife Refuge, 1339 20th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida 32960; Telephone 772/
562–3909, extension 275; Fax 772/299–
3101. The draft plan and environmental
assessment may be accessed and
downloaded from the Service’s Web site
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/.
DATES: Individuals wishing to comment
on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Pelican Island National
Wildlife Refuge should do so no later
than September 26, 2005. Comments on
the draft plan and environmental
assessment may be submitted to Ms.
Cheri Ehrhardt, Planning Team Leader,
Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge,
P.O. Box 6504, Titusville, Florida
32782–6504; Telephone 321/861–2368;
Fax 321/861–1276, or may be submitted
via electronic mail to
cheri_ehrhardt@fws.gov. Please include
your name and return address in your
message. Our practice is to make
comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for
public review during regular business
hours. Individual respondents may
requests that we withhold their home
addresses from the record, which we
will honor to the extent allowable by
law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The draft
plan identifies and evaluates three
alternatives for managing the refuge
over the next 15 years. Under
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:40 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Alternative A, management would
continue with programs following the
same direction, emphasis, and intensity
as historically occurred. No active
management would address threatened
and endangered species; neotropical
migratory birds; shorebirds; natural and
spoil islands; estuarine habitats; fish
species; fish and wildlife disturbance;
aquatic exotic, invasive, and nuisance
species; seagrass beds; commercial
operations on the refuge; and research
activities occurring on the refuge. Few
wildlife surveys would be conducted by
the refuge. Limited management
activities would address exotic,
invasive, and nuisance species in
transitional and upland habitats. Under
Alternative A, the Kroegel Homestead
would not be protected by the Fish and
Wildlife Service. Further, no visitor
center facility would be developed.
Little or no patrol and enforcement
would be provided to vulnerable
archaeological sites of the refuge.
Recreational activities would continue
as currently offered, under the current
lease with the State of Florida.
Recreational activities (e.g., jet skiing
and island camping) that are currently
negatively impacting refuge wildlife and
habitat would continue to occur under
the current lease with the State of
Florida. Refuge staff would continue at
6 or fewer staff members.
Under Alternative B, management
activities would minimally expand.
Management activities would complete
shoreline restoration of Pelican Island
proper, expand the buffer of Pelican
Island proper in accord with current
research, and conduct regular patrol and
enforcement activities. Further,
management activities would expand to
conduct baseline surveys for neotropical
migratory birds; shorebirds; exotic,
invasive, and nuisance species; and
native wildlife using the refuge. Special
use permits would be required for all
research and commercial activities on
the refuge. The refuge would pursue
partnerships to protect key fish and
spawning and settlement sites, to limit
disturbance. The refuge would enhance
opportunities for passive recreative,
including observing and photographing
wildlife, providing environmental
education opportunities through
partners, and interpreting the refuge.
Fishing activities would continue to
occur, under the current lease with the
State of Florida. Other recreational
activities (e.g., jet skiing and island
camping) that are currently negatively
impacting refuge wildlife and habitat
would continue to occur under the
current lease with the State of Florida.
Regular patrol and enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43447
activities would help limit negative
impacts to archaeological sites on the
refuge. Under Alternative B, the Kroegel
Homestead would not be protected by
the Fish and Wildlife Service. Further,
no visitor center facility would be
developed. To accomplish the outlined
expansions in the biological, public use,
and law enforcement programs, the staff
level would expand to a total of nine.
Alternative C, the preferred
alternative, moderately expands refuge
management activities to a level more in
keeping with resources protected in the
developed and developing landscape
that surrounds the refuge. Under
Alternative C, the biological program
would expand to encompass
management activities addressing rare,
threatened, and endangered species;
migratory birds; and wildlife diversity,
including managing research projects,
restoring and creating appropriate
habitats, mapping key sites, collecting
data, coordinating with education and
management partners, and monitoring
occurrences. Baseline data collection
and habitat management activities
would be directed towards neotropical
migratory birds, shorebirds, native
wildlife, and fish and wildlife
disturbance. To limit wildlife and
habitat disturbance and to provide
better management of and protection for
wildlife and habitats of the refuge, the
refuge would work with the State of
Florida and other governmental partners
to alter existing agreements to enable
the enforcement of Service regulations
on all refuge managed lands and waters.
Key fish spawning and settlement sites
would be protected. Only compatible
public use activities would be allowed
to occur on all refuge owned or
managed lands and waters. All uses not
meeting the requirements of
compatibility would be eliminated from
the refuge (e.g., jet skiing and island
camping). Fishing activities would
include bank fishing from select upland
sites. Signs, boardwalks, additional
trails, and a wildlife drive would
enhance existing recreational
opportunities, including wildlife
observation and photography and
interpretation. All other activities on the
refuge, such as research activities and
commercial operations, would be
required to obtain and maintain refuge
special use permits. The refuge would
work with the partners to acquire,
manage, and list in the National Historic
Register the Kroegel Homestead, home
to the first refuge manager. The refuge
would develop a modest visitor center
and other visitor use facilities. Regular
patrol and enforcement activities would
help limit negative impacts to wildlife,
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
43448
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Notices
habitats, historical resources, and
archaeological sites of the refuges. To
enable the implementation of
management activities outlined under
Alternative C, the refuge volunteer
program would more than double from
current levels and refuge staff would be
expanded to eleven.
Pelican Island National Wildlife
Refuge was established in 1903 by
President Roosevelt ‘‘as a preserve and
breeding ground for native birds’’
through an unnumbered Executive
Order. Located across the Intracoastal
Waterway from Sebastian, Florida, in
Indian River County in southeastern
Florida, the refuge manages over 5,400
acres of estuarine, transitional, and
upland habitats supporting 14 federally
listed species and 45 state listed species,
as well as a wide variety of mammals,
birds, reptiles and amphibians, fishes,
invertebrates, and plants. Although the
refuge exists in an increasingly
developed landscape, it supports key
fish spawning sites, a globally important
juvenile sea turtle habitat, and
important bird rookeries. Given its
location in a transitional zone between
subtropical and temperate climates,
refuge supports highly diverse resident
and migratory species. Over 600 wildlife
species have been confirmed on the
refuge with hundreds more expected to
occur with more extensive surveys.
Over 130 species of birds, over 200
species of fish, and 250 species of plants
have been confirmed on the refuge.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: January 25, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register,
July 22, 2005.
[FR Doc. 05–14796 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Eastern North Carolina Natural Gas
Company has applied for a permit to
construct an 8-inch natural gas pipeline
in a 35 foot wide right-of-way. The
right-of-way will start at where Canal E
Road enters Pungo Unit of the Pocosin
Lakes National Wildlife Refuge and
running approximately for 8.1 miles.
This pipeline right-of-way will be on,
under, and across a strip of land lying
in Washington and Hyde Counties, in
the State of North Carolina. The Fish
and Wildlife Service is currently
considering the merits of approving this
application.
Interested persons desiring to
comment on this application must do so
by August 26, 2005.
DATES:
Comments or requests for
additional information should be
addressed to Ms. Jackie Cumpton,
Refuges and Wildlife (Realty), Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 420, Atlanta, Georgia
30345, telephone (404) 679–7160; fax
(404) 679–7273.
ADDRESSES:
If you
wish to comment, you may do so by one
of the following methods. You may mail
comments to the above address. You
may also comment via the Internet at
the following address:
Jackie_Cumpton@fws.gov. Please
include your name and return address
in your Internet message. If you do not
receive a confirmation from the system
that we have received your Internet
message, contact us at the above phone
number or address. Our practice is to
make comments, including names and
address of respondents, available for
public review during regular business
hours. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their home
address from the record, which we will
honor to the extent allowable by law.
The Fish and Wildlife Services is the
principal Federal agency responsible for
conserving, protecting, and enhancing
fish, wildlife, and plants and their
habitats for the continuing benefit of the
American people.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge
Authority: The authority to publish this
notice is contained in 30 U.S.C. 185(k).
Notice of application for a
natural gas pipeline right-of-way on
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge,
Washington and Hyde Counties, North
Carolina.
Dated: June 29, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 05–14795 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
Notice is hereby given that
under Section 28 of the Mineral Leasing
Act of 1920 (41 Stat. 449: 30 U.S.C. 185),
as amended by Public Law 93–153, the
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:40 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Geological Survey
Request for Public Comments on a
Proposed New Information Collection
To Be Submitted to OMB for Review
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
A request for a new information
collection described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for approval under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Copies of the proposed collection may
be obtained by contacting the USGS
Clearance Officer at the phone number
listed below. Comments on the proposal
should be made within 60 days to the
Bureau Clearance Officer, U.S.
Geological Survey, 807 National Center,
Reston, VA 20192.
As required by OMB regulations at 5
CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the USGS solicits
specific public comments as to:
1. Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions on the
bureaus, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
2. The accuracy of the bureau’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
3. The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and
4. How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
information technology.
Title: National Water Information
System Survey.
OMB Approval No.: New collection.
SUMMARY: The collection of information
referred herein applies to a World-Wide
Web site questionnaire to be placed on
the U.S. Geological Survey NWISWeb
Web site (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/
nwis). The optional survey will assist in
identifying the types of customers who
use the NWISWeb system, their needs
and their satisfaction levels. In
particular it will request detailed
feedback from users who use the
NWISWeb to electronically collect the
system’s data, so that their needs can be
incorporated into future changes to
NWISWeb.
Estimated Completion Time: 10
minutes.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 10,000.
Frequency: No frequency. Filling out
the survey is wholly voluntary but
would normally be done only once per
user.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43446-43448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14796]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pelican Island National Wildlife
Refuge in Sebastian, Florida.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service announces that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental
[[Page 43447]]
Assessment for Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge are available
for review and comment. The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, requires the Service to develop a
comprehensive conservation plan for each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose in developing a comprehensive conservation plan is to provide
refuge managers with 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management,
conservation, legal mandates, and Service policies. In addition to
outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their
habitat, plans identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education
and interpretation.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment should be addressed to Mr. Paul
Tritaik, Refuge Manager, Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, 1339
20th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; Telephone 772/562-3909,
extension 275; Fax 772/299-3101. The draft plan and environmental
assessment may be accessed and downloaded from the Service's Web site
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/.
DATES: Individuals wishing to comment on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pelican Island
National Wildlife Refuge should do so no later than September 26, 2005.
Comments on the draft plan and environmental assessment may be
submitted to Ms. Cheri Ehrhardt, Planning Team Leader, Merritt Island
National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 6504, Titusville, Florida 32782-
6504; Telephone 321/861-2368; Fax 321/861-1276, or may be submitted via
electronic mail to cheri_ehrhardt@fws.gov. Please include your name
and return address in your message. Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public
review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may
requests that we withhold their home addresses from the record, which
we will honor to the extent allowable by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The draft plan identifies and evaluates
three alternatives for managing the refuge over the next 15 years.
Under Alternative A, management would continue with programs following
the same direction, emphasis, and intensity as historically occurred.
No active management would address threatened and endangered species;
neotropical migratory birds; shorebirds; natural and spoil islands;
estuarine habitats; fish species; fish and wildlife disturbance;
aquatic exotic, invasive, and nuisance species; seagrass beds;
commercial operations on the refuge; and research activities occurring
on the refuge. Few wildlife surveys would be conducted by the refuge.
Limited management activities would address exotic, invasive, and
nuisance species in transitional and upland habitats. Under Alternative
A, the Kroegel Homestead would not be protected by the Fish and
Wildlife Service. Further, no visitor center facility would be
developed. Little or no patrol and enforcement would be provided to
vulnerable archaeological sites of the refuge. Recreational activities
would continue as currently offered, under the current lease with the
State of Florida. Recreational activities (e.g., jet skiing and island
camping) that are currently negatively impacting refuge wildlife and
habitat would continue to occur under the current lease with the State
of Florida. Refuge staff would continue at 6 or fewer staff members.
Under Alternative B, management activities would minimally expand.
Management activities would complete shoreline restoration of Pelican
Island proper, expand the buffer of Pelican Island proper in accord
with current research, and conduct regular patrol and enforcement
activities. Further, management activities would expand to conduct
baseline surveys for neotropical migratory birds; shorebirds; exotic,
invasive, and nuisance species; and native wildlife using the refuge.
Special use permits would be required for all research and commercial
activities on the refuge. The refuge would pursue partnerships to
protect key fish and spawning and settlement sites, to limit
disturbance. The refuge would enhance opportunities for passive
recreative, including observing and photographing wildlife, providing
environmental education opportunities through partners, and
interpreting the refuge. Fishing activities would continue to occur,
under the current lease with the State of Florida. Other recreational
activities (e.g., jet skiing and island camping) that are currently
negatively impacting refuge wildlife and habitat would continue to
occur under the current lease with the State of Florida. Regular patrol
and enforcement activities would help limit negative impacts to
archaeological sites on the refuge. Under Alternative B, the Kroegel
Homestead would not be protected by the Fish and Wildlife Service.
Further, no visitor center facility would be developed. To accomplish
the outlined expansions in the biological, public use, and law
enforcement programs, the staff level would expand to a total of nine.
Alternative C, the preferred alternative, moderately expands refuge
management activities to a level more in keeping with resources
protected in the developed and developing landscape that surrounds the
refuge. Under Alternative C, the biological program would expand to
encompass management activities addressing rare, threatened, and
endangered species; migratory birds; and wildlife diversity, including
managing research projects, restoring and creating appropriate
habitats, mapping key sites, collecting data, coordinating with
education and management partners, and monitoring occurrences. Baseline
data collection and habitat management activities would be directed
towards neotropical migratory birds, shorebirds, native wildlife, and
fish and wildlife disturbance. To limit wildlife and habitat
disturbance and to provide better management of and protection for
wildlife and habitats of the refuge, the refuge would work with the
State of Florida and other governmental partners to alter existing
agreements to enable the enforcement of Service regulations on all
refuge managed lands and waters. Key fish spawning and settlement sites
would be protected. Only compatible public use activities would be
allowed to occur on all refuge owned or managed lands and waters. All
uses not meeting the requirements of compatibility would be eliminated
from the refuge (e.g., jet skiing and island camping). Fishing
activities would include bank fishing from select upland sites. Signs,
boardwalks, additional trails, and a wildlife drive would enhance
existing recreational opportunities, including wildlife observation and
photography and interpretation. All other activities on the refuge,
such as research activities and commercial operations, would be
required to obtain and maintain refuge special use permits. The refuge
would work with the partners to acquire, manage, and list in the
National Historic Register the Kroegel Homestead, home to the first
refuge manager. The refuge would develop a modest visitor center and
other visitor use facilities. Regular patrol and enforcement activities
would help limit negative impacts to wildlife,
[[Page 43448]]
habitats, historical resources, and archaeological sites of the
refuges. To enable the implementation of management activities outlined
under Alternative C, the refuge volunteer program would more than
double from current levels and refuge staff would be expanded to
eleven.
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1903 by
President Roosevelt ``as a preserve and breeding ground for native
birds'' through an unnumbered Executive Order. Located across the
Intracoastal Waterway from Sebastian, Florida, in Indian River County
in southeastern Florida, the refuge manages over 5,400 acres of
estuarine, transitional, and upland habitats supporting 14 federally
listed species and 45 state listed species, as well as a wide variety
of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians, fishes, invertebrates, and
plants. Although the refuge exists in an increasingly developed
landscape, it supports key fish spawning sites, a globally important
juvenile sea turtle habitat, and important bird rookeries. Given its
location in a transitional zone between subtropical and temperate
climates, refuge supports highly diverse resident and migratory
species. Over 600 wildlife species have been confirmed on the refuge
with hundreds more expected to occur with more extensive surveys. Over
130 species of birds, over 200 species of fish, and 250 species of
plants have been confirmed on the refuge.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: January 25, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the
Federal Register, July 22, 2005.
[FR Doc. 05-14796 Filed 7-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M