Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, 43445-43446 [05-14785]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Notices
with generally acceptable information
security guidelines via use of security
codes, passwords, Personal
Identification Numbers (PINs), and
other similar safeguards.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on July 21,
2005.
Lisa S. Dean,
Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–14819 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
BILLING CODE 4910–62–P
Employee case files are destroyed
when 30 years old in accordance with
TSA Records Schedule 2400 et seq.
Computer files are deleted after the
expiration of the retention period
authorized for the disposal of the hard
copy file or when no longer needed,
whichever is later.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Director, Occupational Safety, Health,
and Environment, Office of
Administration, TSA–17, 701 South
12th Street, Arlington, VA 22202–4220.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
To determine if this system contains
a record relating to you, write to the
system manager at the address indicated
above and provide your full name,
current address, date of birth, place of
birth, and a description of information
that you seek, including the time frame
during which the record(s) may have
been generated. You may also provide
your social security number or other
unique identifier(s), but you are not
required to do so. Individuals requesting
access must comply with the
Department of Homeland Security’s
Privacy Act regulations on verification
of identity (6 CFR 5.21(d)).
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURE:
Same as ‘‘Notification procedure’’
above.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURE:
Same as ‘‘Notification procedure’’
above.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
(1) The individual or their
representative;
(2) Their dependents;
(3) Witnesses;
(4) Employing agency;
(5) Medical personnel and
institutions;
(6) Departmental Records;
(7) Office of Workers’ Compensation
Program;
(8) Office of Personnel Management;
(9) State and Federal records;
(10) Motor Vehicle Accident Reports
(SF–91); and
(11) Excerpts of police reports,
witness statements, and general
correspondence.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:40 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Cameron Prairie National Wildlife
Refuge
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment for
Cameron Prairie National Wildlife
Refuge in Cameron Parish, Louisiana.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The notice announces that a
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment for
Cameron Prairie National Wildlife
Refuge is now available for review and
comment. The National Wildlife Refuge
System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires the Service to develop a
comprehensive conservation plan for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose in developing a comprehensive
conservation plan is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, plans identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation.
Proposed goals for the refuge include:
• Preserving, restoring, and
enhancing diverse habitats to provide
favorable conditions for migratory and
native wildlife species;
• Maintaining healthy and viable
native fish and wildlife populations on
the refuge to contribute to the purpose
for which it was established and to the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System;
• Providing opportunities for safe,
quality, compatible, wildlife-dependent
public use and recreation, which
includes hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43445
environmental education and
interpretation;
• Protecting cultural resources in
accordance with Federal and state
historic preservation legislation and
regulations; and
• Developing and maintaining the
Southwest Louisiana National Wildlife
Refuge Complex Headquarters in a
manner that supports, directs, and
manages the needs, resources, and staff
of Cameron Prairie, Sabine, and
Lacassine National Wildlife Refuges.
Also available for review are the draft
compatibility determinations for:
recreational fishing; recreational
hunting; environmental education and
interpretation; wildlife observation and
photography; commercial alligator
harvest; commercially guided wildlife
viewing, photography, environmental
education, and interpretation; research
and monitoring; commercial video and
photography; adjacent property access;
and beneficial use of dredge material.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to adopt and
implement a 15-year comprehensive
conservation plan for management that
best achieves the refuge’s purpose,
vision, and goals; contributes to the
National Wildlife Refuge System
mission; addresses the significant issues
and relevant mandates; and is consistent
with principles of sound fish and
wildlife management. The Service
analyzed three alternatives for future
management and chose Alternative B as
the one to best achieve all of these
elements.
Alternatives
The draft comprehensive conservation
plan and environmental assessment
evaluates three alternatives for
managing the refuge over the next 15
years. These alternatives are briefly
described as follows:
Alternative A represents the status
quo; e.g., no changes from current
management of the refuge. The refuge
would continue with approximately the
same direction, emphases, constraints,
and priorities that have characterized
management decisions and actions in
recent years. Habitats would be
managed under current policies.
Removal of undesirable plants and
animals would occur as funding and
staffing permit. Cultural resources
would be protected at current levels.
Public use opportunities would remain
the same as current levels.
Under Alternative B, the Service’s
proposed action, the quality and
quantity of habitat for wintering
waterfowl would be maximized by
focusing on a more adaptive
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
43446
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Notices
management approach through
improved biological monitoring.
Alternative B would best support the
purpose for which the refuge was
established.
The refuge would be managed with an
active hands-on, labor intensive
approach. The refuge would intensely
manage up to 1,500 acres of early
successional wetlands. Succession
would be controlled with more
aggressive drawdown cycles, more
frequent soil disturbance, and by
implementing a more focused fire
management program. Public use
opportunities would generally increase
under this alternative but hunting and
fishing opportunities would remain at
the same level that is currently
occurring with the exception of rabbit
hunting. Facilities such as trails,
boardwalks, observation platforms, and
photography blinds would be improved.
The refuge would increase its emphasis
on environmental education and
interpretation.
Archery hunting for resident deer
would continue to manage populations
and provide hunting opportunities for
archers. Snipe and dove hunting would
continue. A lottery waterfowl hunt
would be allowed for youth with
parental or guardian supervision. The
purpose of the youth hunt is to provide
opportunities for public access to
waterfowl hunting because these
opportunities are limited state-wide and
would introduce young hunters to a safe
controlled hunting environment. The
experimental rabbit hunt would be
discontinued due to declining public
interest and conflicting management
activities. Habitat that is managed for
wintering waterfowl is not favorable for
a quality rabbit hunt and harvest.
Commercial alligator harvest would
continue in cooperation with Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
and would be by lottery only.
Commercial guides for wildlife viewing,
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation would be
permitted. Existing fishing areas on the
refuge would be improved. Research
and monitoring would be enhanced.
Programs that promote the beneficial
use of dredge material would be
allowed. Current partnerships that assist
the refuge in accomplishing its
conservation objectives would continue
under this alternative, however, the
refuge would strive to develop new
partnerships with conservation groups
and state agencies. Communication with
local landowners and community
groups would continue in order to
promote wildlife conservation and the
National Wildlife Refuge System. A
more aggressive approach to removal of
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:01 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
undesirable plants and animals would
be implemented. Cultural resources
would continue to be protected and
interpretation of cultural resources
would be improved.
Under Alternative C, the refuge would
degrade all levees to an extent defined
as the ‘‘neareast marsh elevation found
in the area.’’ The refuge would then be
in custodial form. No active habitat
management would be applied. Staff
would serve as caretakers of the refuge,
observing and monitoring the natural
forces and ecological succession that
would shape its habitats and effectively
determine their suitability for wildlife.
Water management capability would
cease and no mechanical or prescribed
fire disturbances would occur. Use of
fire would be limited to hazardous fuel
reduction and suppression of wildfires.
Removal of undesirable plants and
animals would be minimal. Enjoyment
of opportunities for public use may
decline because wildlife diversity and
abundance may be reduced under this
alternative. Cultural resources would
continue to be protected and
interpretation of cultural resources
would be improved.
Actions Common to All Alternatives
All three alternatives share the
following management concepts and
techniques for achieving the goals of the
refuge:
• Protecting a variety of freshwater
marsh and upland prairie habitat;
• Serving as a critical resting area for
waterfowl in a heavily hunted area;
• Establishing, maintaining, and
improving partnerships with
landowners and local, state, and Federal
agencies and organizations;
• Coordinating management actions
with local and state land and resource
managment agencies; and
• Encouraging scientific research on
the refuge.
DATES: An Open House will be held at
the refuge on August 18, 2005, from 2
p.m. to 7 p.m. to present the plan to the
public. The refuge headquarters is
located at 1428 Highway 27, Bell City,
Louisiana. Individuals wishing to
comment on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Cameron Prairie
National Wildlife Refuge should do so
no later than September 12, 2005. Public
comments were requested, considered,
and incorporated throughout the
planning process. Public outreach has
included public scoping meetings,
technical workgroups, planning
updates, and a Federal Register notice.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Environmental Assessment should
be addressed to Judy McClendon,
Natural Resource Planner, Southwest
Louisiana National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, Cameron Prairie National
Wildlife Refuge, 1428 Highway 27, Bell
City, Louisiana 70630; Telephone
337/598–2216; Fax 337/598–2492.
Comments on the draft may be sumitted
to the above address or via electronic
mail to judy_mcclendon@fws.gov.
Please include your name and return
address in your internet message. Our
practice is to make comments, including
names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from
the record, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Cameron
Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, located
in southwestern Louisiana, consists of
9,621 acres of freshwater marsh, coastal
prairie, and early successional wetlands,
and is managed to preserve and protect
wintering waterfowl and their habitat.
Cameron Prairie is one of three refuges
comprising the Southwest Louisiana
National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
Annually, about 30,000 visitors
participate in refuge activities,
including recreational fishing,
recreational hunting, wildlife
photography, wildlife observation, and
environmental education and
interpretation.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: January 6, 2004.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial note:
This document was received at the Office
of the Federal Register July 22, 2005.
[FR Doc. 05–14785 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment for
Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge
in Sebastian, Florida.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service
announces that a Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43445-43446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14785]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Cameron Prairie National Wildlife
Refuge in Cameron Parish, Louisiana.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The notice announces that a Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Cameron Prairie National Wildlife
Refuge is now available for review and comment. The National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires the Service to
develop a comprehensive conservation plan for each national wildlife
refuge. The purpose in developing a comprehensive conservation plan is
to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, plans identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation.
Proposed goals for the refuge include:
Preserving, restoring, and enhancing diverse habitats to
provide favorable conditions for migratory and native wildlife species;
Maintaining healthy and viable native fish and wildlife
populations on the refuge to contribute to the purpose for which it was
established and to the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System;
Providing opportunities for safe, quality, compatible,
wildlife-dependent public use and recreation, which includes hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental
education and interpretation;
Protecting cultural resources in accordance with Federal
and state historic preservation legislation and regulations; and
Developing and maintaining the Southwest Louisiana
National Wildlife Refuge Complex Headquarters in a manner that
supports, directs, and manages the needs, resources, and staff of
Cameron Prairie, Sabine, and Lacassine National Wildlife Refuges.
Also available for review are the draft compatibility
determinations for: recreational fishing; recreational hunting;
environmental education and interpretation; wildlife observation and
photography; commercial alligator harvest; commercially guided wildlife
viewing, photography, environmental education, and interpretation;
research and monitoring; commercial video and photography; adjacent
property access; and beneficial use of dredge material.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to adopt and implement a 15-year
comprehensive conservation plan for management that best achieves the
refuge's purpose, vision, and goals; contributes to the National
Wildlife Refuge System mission; addresses the significant issues and
relevant mandates; and is consistent with principles of sound fish and
wildlife management. The Service analyzed three alternatives for future
management and chose Alternative B as the one to best achieve all of
these elements.
Alternatives
The draft comprehensive conservation plan and environmental
assessment evaluates three alternatives for managing the refuge over
the next 15 years. These alternatives are briefly described as follows:
Alternative A represents the status quo; e.g., no changes from
current management of the refuge. The refuge would continue with
approximately the same direction, emphases, constraints, and priorities
that have characterized management decisions and actions in recent
years. Habitats would be managed under current policies. Removal of
undesirable plants and animals would occur as funding and staffing
permit. Cultural resources would be protected at current levels. Public
use opportunities would remain the same as current levels.
Under Alternative B, the Service's proposed action, the quality and
quantity of habitat for wintering waterfowl would be maximized by
focusing on a more adaptive
[[Page 43446]]
management approach through improved biological monitoring. Alternative
B would best support the purpose for which the refuge was established.
The refuge would be managed with an active hands-on, labor
intensive approach. The refuge would intensely manage up to 1,500 acres
of early successional wetlands. Succession would be controlled with
more aggressive drawdown cycles, more frequent soil disturbance, and by
implementing a more focused fire management program. Public use
opportunities would generally increase under this alternative but
hunting and fishing opportunities would remain at the same level that
is currently occurring with the exception of rabbit hunting. Facilities
such as trails, boardwalks, observation platforms, and photography
blinds would be improved. The refuge would increase its emphasis on
environmental education and interpretation.
Archery hunting for resident deer would continue to manage
populations and provide hunting opportunities for archers. Snipe and
dove hunting would continue. A lottery waterfowl hunt would be allowed
for youth with parental or guardian supervision. The purpose of the
youth hunt is to provide opportunities for public access to waterfowl
hunting because these opportunities are limited state-wide and would
introduce young hunters to a safe controlled hunting environment. The
experimental rabbit hunt would be discontinued due to declining public
interest and conflicting management activities. Habitat that is managed
for wintering waterfowl is not favorable for a quality rabbit hunt and
harvest. Commercial alligator harvest would continue in cooperation
with Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and would be by
lottery only. Commercial guides for wildlife viewing, photography, and
environmental education and interpretation would be permitted. Existing
fishing areas on the refuge would be improved. Research and monitoring
would be enhanced. Programs that promote the beneficial use of dredge
material would be allowed. Current partnerships that assist the refuge
in accomplishing its conservation objectives would continue under this
alternative, however, the refuge would strive to develop new
partnerships with conservation groups and state agencies. Communication
with local landowners and community groups would continue in order to
promote wildlife conservation and the National Wildlife Refuge System.
A more aggressive approach to removal of undesirable plants and animals
would be implemented. Cultural resources would continue to be protected
and interpretation of cultural resources would be improved.
Under Alternative C, the refuge would degrade all levees to an
extent defined as the ``neareast marsh elevation found in the area.''
The refuge would then be in custodial form. No active habitat
management would be applied. Staff would serve as caretakers of the
refuge, observing and monitoring the natural forces and ecological
succession that would shape its habitats and effectively determine
their suitability for wildlife. Water management capability would cease
and no mechanical or prescribed fire disturbances would occur. Use of
fire would be limited to hazardous fuel reduction and suppression of
wildfires. Removal of undesirable plants and animals would be minimal.
Enjoyment of opportunities for public use may decline because wildlife
diversity and abundance may be reduced under this alternative. Cultural
resources would continue to be protected and interpretation of cultural
resources would be improved.
Actions Common to All Alternatives
All three alternatives share the following management concepts and
techniques for achieving the goals of the refuge:
Protecting a variety of freshwater marsh and upland
prairie habitat;
Serving as a critical resting area for waterfowl in a
heavily hunted area;
Establishing, maintaining, and improving partnerships with
landowners and local, state, and Federal agencies and organizations;
Coordinating management actions with local and state land
and resource managment agencies; and
Encouraging scientific research on the refuge.
DATES: An Open House will be held at the refuge on August 18, 2005,
from 2 p.m. to 7 p.m. to present the plan to the public. The refuge
headquarters is located at 1428 Highway 27, Bell City, Louisiana.
Individuals wishing to comment on the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Cameron Prairie National Wildlife
Refuge should do so no later than September 12, 2005. Public comments
were requested, considered, and incorporated throughout the planning
process. Public outreach has included public scoping meetings,
technical workgroups, planning updates, and a Federal Register notice.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment should be addressed to Judy
McClendon, Natural Resource Planner, Southwest Louisiana National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, 1428
Highway 27, Bell City, Louisiana 70630; Telephone 337/598-2216; Fax
337/598-2492. Comments on the draft may be sumitted to the above
address or via electronic mail to judy_mcclendon@fws.gov. Please
include your name and return address in your internet message. Our
practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home
addresses from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable
by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge,
located in southwestern Louisiana, consists of 9,621 acres of
freshwater marsh, coastal prairie, and early successional wetlands, and
is managed to preserve and protect wintering waterfowl and their
habitat. Cameron Prairie is one of three refuges comprising the
Southwest Louisiana National Wildlife Refuge Complex. Annually, about
30,000 visitors participate in refuge activities, including
recreational fishing, recreational hunting, wildlife photography,
wildlife observation, and environmental education and interpretation.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: January 6, 2004.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial note:
This document was received at the Office of the Federal Register
July 22, 2005.
[FR Doc. 05-14785 Filed 7-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M