Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest, NJ, 43345-43347 [05-14755]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 24 months, or after each maintenance
task where removal of and installation of the
girt bar is necessary, whichever occurs
earlier.
(1) For Boeing Model 757–200 and –200CB
series airplanes: Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757–52–0085, dated March
24, 2005.
(2) For Boeing Model 757–300 series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757–52–0086, dated March 24, 2005.
Equivalent Procedures
(g) Where Part 1—‘‘Inspection’’ of the
applicable service bulletin in paragraph (f)(1)
or (f)(2) of this AD specifies that actions may
be accomplished in accordance with an
‘‘approved equivalent procedure’’: The
corrective actions must be accomplished in
accordance with the chapter of the Boeing
757 Airplane Maintenance Manual (AMM) or
Boeing 757 Component Maintenance Manual
(CMM) specified in the applicable service
bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 13,
2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–14790 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–076]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest,
NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations
during the ‘‘Sunset Lake Hydrofest’’, a
marine event to be held September 24
and 25, 2005, on the waters of Sunset
Lake, Wildwood Crest, New Jersey.
These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of Sunset Lake during
the event.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:42 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 119 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–05–076),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
In order to provide notice and an
opportunity to comment before issuing
an effective rule, we are providing a
shorter than normal comment period. A
30-day comment period is sufficient to
allow those who might be affected by
this rulemaking to submit their
comments because the regulations have
a narrow, local application, and there
will be local notifications in addition to
the Federal Register publication such as
press releases, marine information
broadcasts, and the Local Notice to
Mariners.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43345
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On September 24 and 25, 2005, the
Sunset Lake Hydrofest Association will
sponsor the ‘‘Sunset Lake Hydrofest’’,
on the waters of Sunset Lake near
Wildwood Crest, New Jersey. The event
will consist of approximately 100
inboard hydroplanes, Jersey Speed
Skiffs and flat-bottom ski boats racing in
heats counter-clockwise around an oval
racecourse. A fleet of approximately 100
spectator vessels is expected to gather
nearby to view the competition. Due to
the need for vessel control during the
event, vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of Sunset Lake. The
temporary special local regulations
would be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to
5:30 p.m. on September 24 and 25,
2005, and will restrict general
navigation in the regulated area during
the event. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel
will be allowed to enter or remain in the
regulated area. These regulations are
needed to control vessel traffic during
the event to enhance the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation
will prevent traffic from transiting a
portion of Sunset Lake during the event,
the effect of this regulation would not be
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
43346
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
significant due to the limited duration
that the regulated area will be in effect.
Extensive advance notifications will be
made to the maritime community via
Local Notice to Mariners, marine
information broadcasts, and area
newspapers, so mariners can adjust
their plans accordingly. Additionally,
the proposed regulated area has been
narrowly tailored to impose the least
impact on general navigation yet
provide the level of safety deemed
necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to
transit Sunset Lake by navigating
around the regulated area.
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
the address listed under ADDRESSES. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of Sunset Lake
during the event.
This proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This proposed
rule would be in effect for only a limited
period. Vessel traffic could pass safely
around the proposed regulated area.
Before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
Protection of Children
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:42 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) Unless otherwise directed by the
Official Patrol, operate at a minimum
wake speed not to exceed six (6) knots.
(c) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30
p.m. on September 24 and 25, 2005.
Dated: July 2, 2005.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–14755 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–076
to read as follows:
Sunset Lake, Wildwood
(a) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Sunset Lake
Hydrofest under the auspices of the
Marine Event Permit issued to the event
sponsor and approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(4) Regulated area includes all waters
of Sunset Lake, New Jersey, from
shoreline to shoreline, south of latitude
38°58′32″ N. All coordinates reference
Datum: NAD 1983.
(b) Special local regulations: (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
17:42 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
33 CFR Part 100
RIN 1625–AA08
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
VerDate jul<14>2003
Coast Guard
[CGD05–05–075]
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
§ 100.35–T05–076,
Crest, NJ.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Choptank River, Cambridge,
MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations
during the ‘‘Cambridge Offshore
Challenge’’, a marine event to be held
over the waters of the Choptank River at
Cambridge, Maryland. These special
local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in the Choptank River during the
event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 119 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43347
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–05–075),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
In order to provide notice and an
opportunity to comment before issuing
an effective rule, we are providing a
shorter than normal comment period. A
30-day comment period is sufficient to
allow those who might be affected by
this rulemaking to submit their
comments because the regulations have
a narrow, local application, and there
will be local notifications in addition to
the Federal Register publication such as
press releases, marine information
broadcasts, and the Local Notice to
Mariners.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On September 25, 2005, the
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association
will sponsor the ‘‘2005 Cambridge
Offshore Challenge’’, on the waters of
the Choptank River at Cambridge,
Maryland. The event will consist of
approximately 40 offshore powerboats
conducting high-speed competitive
races between the Route 50 Bridge and
Oystershell Point, MD. A fleet of
approximately 250 spectator vessels is
expected to gather nearby to view the
competition. Due to the need for vessel
control during the event, vessel traffic
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 27, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43345-43347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14755]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-05-076]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Sunset Lake,
Wildwood Crest, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local
regulations during the ``Sunset Lake Hydrofest'', a marine event to be
held September 24 and 25, 2005, on the waters of Sunset Lake, Wildwood
Crest, New Jersey. These special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic in portions of
Sunset Lake during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before August 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, hand-deliver them to Room 119 at the same address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, or fax them to (757) 398-6203. The Auxiliary and Recreational
Boating Safety Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the
public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at the above address between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Auxiliary and Recreational Boating Safety Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-05-
076), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
In order to provide notice and an opportunity to comment before
issuing an effective rule, we are providing a shorter than normal
comment period. A 30-day comment period is sufficient to allow those
who might be affected by this rulemaking to submit their comments
because the regulations have a narrow, local application, and there
will be local notifications in addition to the Federal Register
publication such as press releases, marine information broadcasts, and
the Local Notice to Mariners.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the address listed under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On September 24 and 25, 2005, the Sunset Lake Hydrofest Association
will sponsor the ``Sunset Lake Hydrofest'', on the waters of Sunset
Lake near Wildwood Crest, New Jersey. The event will consist of
approximately 100 inboard hydroplanes, Jersey Speed Skiffs and flat-
bottom ski boats racing in heats counter-clockwise around an oval
racecourse. A fleet of approximately 100 spectator vessels is expected
to gather nearby to view the competition. Due to the need for vessel
control during the event, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted
to provide for the safety of participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of Sunset Lake. The temporary special
local regulations would be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on
September 24 and 25, 2005, and will restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the event. Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel
will be allowed to enter or remain in the regulated area. These
regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to
enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of Sunset Lake during the event, the effect of
this regulation would not be
[[Page 43346]]
significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area will be
in effect. Extensive advance notifications will be made to the maritime
community via Local Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts,
and area newspapers, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Additionally, the proposed regulated area has been narrowly tailored to
impose the least impact on general navigation yet provide the level of
safety deemed necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to transit Sunset
Lake by navigating around the regulated area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of
Sunset Lake during the event.
This proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
proposed rule would be in effect for only a limited period. Vessel
traffic could pass safely around the proposed regulated area. Before
the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact the address listed
under ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the
[[Page 43347]]
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a regatta or marine parade
permit are specifically excluded from further analysis and
documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-076 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-076, Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest, NJ.
(a) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels participating in the Sunset
Lake Hydrofest under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit issued to
the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Delaware Bay.
(4) Regulated area includes all waters of Sunset Lake, New Jersey,
from shoreline to shoreline, south of latitude 38[deg]58'32'' N. All
coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.
(b) Special local regulations: (1) Except for event participants
and persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official Patrol.
(iii) Unless otherwise directed by the Official Patrol, operate at
a minimum wake speed not to exceed six (6) knots.
(c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on September 24 and 25, 2005.
Dated: July 2, 2005.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-14755 Filed 7-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P