Federal Acquisition Regulation; Payment Withholding, 43580-43581 [05-14668]
Download as PDF
43580
8.405–8
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
[Redesignated as 8.405–7]
8. Redesignate section 8.405–8 as
8.405–7.
I
[FR Doc. 05–14667 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 14, 32, and 52
[FAC 2005–05; FAR Case 2004–003; Item
III]
RIN 9000–AJ94
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Payment Withholding
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(Councils) have agreed on a final rule
amending the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) by removing the
mandatory requirement that a
contracting officer withhold 5 percent of
the payments due under a time-andmaterials contract, unless it is necessary
to withhold payment to protect the
Government’s interest or otherwise
prescribed in the contract schedule. The
final rule also amends FAR guidance
that requires the use of a contract
modification to withhold payment and
to state that the withhold is to be made
by the contractor.
DATES: Effective Date: August 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
FAR Secretariat at (202) 501–4755 for
information pertaining to status or
publication schedules. For clarification
of content, contact Mr. Jeremy Olson, at
(202) 501–3221. Please cite FAC 2005–
05, FAR case 2004–003.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register at
69 FR 29838, May 25, 2004, with
request for public comments. The
proposed rule would permit contracting
officers to use their judgment regarding
whether to withhold payments under
time-and-materials and labor-hour
contracts so that the withhold would be
applied only when necessary to protect
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:07 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
the Government’s interests. The
proposed rule also made it clear that
normally there should not be a need to
withhold payments when dealing with
contractual release requirements in a
timely manner. Six respondents
submitted comments on the proposed
FAR rule. Three of the six respondents
supported the proposed rule, two of the
six respondents supported it but with
certain additional changes that would
align it with the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulations Supplement
(DFARS) rule that was published in the
Federal Register at 68 FR 69631,
December 15, 2003, and one of the six
respondents requested clarification. A
discussion of the comments is provided
below. The Councils considered all
comments and concluded that the
proposed rule should be converted to a
final rule with changes to the proposed
rule. Differences between the proposed
rule and final rule are discussed in
Comments 1 and 2, below.
Align With DFARS
1. Comment: While five respondents
supported the proposed rule, two stated
that it is not consistent with the changes
to relax the requirements included in
the DFARS rule published in the
Federal Register at 68 FR 69631,
December 15, 2003. That rule stated
that, if it was necessary to withhold
payment to protect the Government’s
interest, the contracting officer would
issue a modification requiring the
contractor to withhold 5 percent of the
amount due, up to a maximum of
$50,000. One of the respondents stated
the DFARS guidance should be
applicable Governmentwide ‘‘because
requiring withholds to protect the
interests of the Government is a serious
matter, necessitating, in our opinion, the
execution of a formal contract
modification.’’ In addition, the same
respondent believes that, in most
situations, it would be more efficient
and less costly for both contractors and
the Government if contractors take the
withhold prior to submission of their
invoices.
Councils’ response: Concur. The
Councils believes that, based on the
analysis performed for the DFARS rule,
it would be more efficient and less
costly for both contractors and the
Government if contractors take the
withhold prior to the submission of
their vouchers. In addition, in order to
make it clear that the Government is
exercising its right to a payment
withhold to protect its interests, a
contract modification should be issued
requiring the withhold of payment
under time-and-materials and laborhour contracts. Therefore, the Councils
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
have revised the guidance at FAR
32.111(a)(7)(iii) and the clause at FAR
52.232–7(a)(2) to require the use of a
modification to withhold payment and
to allow for the withhold to be made by
the contractor instead of by the
Government payment office. The
Councils note that this clause does not
preclude the Government from
withholding other amounts due to nonperformance, delivery of nonconforming goods, or other failure(s) to
comply with contract requirements.
Task Order Versus Entire Contract
2. Comment: A respondent stated that
the proposed rule is unclear as to
whether the $50,000 ceiling on
withholding applies to an individual
task or to an entire contract. It
recommended the proposed rule be
clarified to identify the basis for
application of the ceiling. The
respondent added that it had previously
recommended in an audit report that the
$50,000 ceiling be applied to each order
where orders are closed separately. The
respondent’s recommendation is based
on the belief that the clarification will
assist contracting officers in performing
their jobs.
Councils’ response: The Councils
agree that it would assist both
contractors and the Government if the
proposed rule were clarified as to
whether the withhold ceiling applies to
an entire contract or to individual
orders. Such a clarification would
reduce any possible confusion by either
party as to the applicability of the
ceiling and thus remove the potential
for disagreements. The Councils agree
that the withhold ceiling applies to the
entire contract. Therefore, the Councils
have revised the guidance at FAR
32.111(a)(7)(iii) and the clause at FAR
52.232–7(a)(2) to clarify that the
withhold ceiling applies to the total
contract.
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, was not subject to
review under Section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the
General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration certify that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the
rule applies only to time-and-materials
and labor-hour contracts. Time-and-
E:\FR\FM\27JYR3.SGM
27JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
materials or labor-hour contracts with
small business represent only
approximately 2 percent of all contracts.
In addition, the rule eases the impact of
the current FAR by permitting the
contracting officer to use judgment in
deciding whether to withhold
payments, thus the number of contracts
affected is a subset of the 2 percent
figure. This change is expected to have
a small but beneficial impact on small
businesses.
furnish material that is regularly sold to
the general public in the normal course
of business by the contractor and the
price is under the limitations prescribed
in 16.601(b)(3), the contracting officer
shall use the clause with its Alternate I.
(ii) If a labor-hour contract is
contemplated, and if no specific
reimbursement for materials furnished
is intended, the contracting officer may
use the clause with its Alternate II.
(iii) If the contracting officer
determines that it is necessary to
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
withhold payment to protect the
Government’s interests, paragraph (a)(2)
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
of the clause permits the contracting
not apply because the changes to the
officer to unilaterally issue a
FAR do not impose information
collection requirements that require the modification requiring the contractor to
withhold 5 percent of amounts due, up
approval of the Office of Management
to a maximum of $50,000 under the
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
contract. The contracting officer shall
seq.
ensure that the modification specifies
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 14, 32,
the percentage and total amount of the
and 52
withhold payment. Normally, there
Government procurement.
should be no need to withhold payment
for a contractor with a record of timely
Dated: July 20, 2005.
submittal of the release discharging the
Julia B. Wise,
Government from all liabilities,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
obligations, and claims, as required by
I Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
paragraph (f) of the clause.
amend 48 CFR parts 14, 32, and 52 as set
*
*
*
*
*
forth below:
52.232–8
43581
[Amended]
5. In the introductory text of section
52.232–8, remove ‘‘32.111(c)(1)’’ and
add ‘‘32.111(b)(1)’’ in its place.
I
52.232–9
[Amended]
6. In the introductory text of section
52.232–9, remove ‘‘32.111(c)(2)’’ and
add ‘‘32.111(b)(2)’’ in its place.
I
52.232–10
[Amended]
7. In the introductory text of section
52.232–10, remove ‘‘32.111(d)(1)’’ and
add ‘‘32.111(c)(1)’’ in its place.
I
52.232–11
[Amended]
8. In the introductory text of section
52.232–11, remove ‘‘32.111(d)(2)’’ and
add ‘‘32.111(c)(2)’’ in its place.
I
[FR Doc. 05–14668 Filed 7–26–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 19 and 52
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 14, 32, and 52 is revised to read as
follows:
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
[FAC 2005–05; FAR Case 2005–009; Item
IV]
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
I
I
4. Amend section 52.232–7 by—
a. Removing from the introductory text
‘‘32.111(b)’’ and adding ‘‘32.111(a)(7)’’ in
its place;
I b. Revising the date of the clause; and
I c. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
The revised text reads as follows:
RIN 9000–AK22
I
PART 14—SEALED BIDDING
14.408–3
[Amended]
2. Amend section 14.408–3 in
paragraph (b) by removing ‘‘See
32.111(c)(1),’’ and adding ‘‘See
32.111(b)(1),’’ in its place.
I
52.232–7 Payments under Time-andMaterials and Labor-Hour Contracts.
*
PART 32—CONTRACT FINANCING
3. Amend section 32.111 by—
a. Removing from the end of paragraph
(a)(5) the word ‘‘and’’;
I b. Removing the period from the end
of paragraph (a)(6) and adding ‘‘; and’’ in
its place;
I c. Adding paragraph (a)(7);
I d. Removing paragraph (b); and
I e. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d)
as (b) and (c), respectively.
The added text reads as follows:
I
I
32.111 Contract clauses for noncommercial purchases.
(a) * * *
(7) The clause at 52.232–7, Payments
under Time-and-Materials and LaborHour Contracts, in solicitations and
contracts when a time-and-materials or
labor-hour contract is contemplated.
(i) If the nature of the work to be
performed requires the contractor to
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:07 Jul 26, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
*
*
*
PAYMENTS UNDER TIME-ANDMATERIALS AND LABOR-HOUR
CONTRACTS (AUG 2005)
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) Unless otherwise prescribed in the
Schedule, the Contracting Officer may
unilaterally issue a contract
modification requiring the Contractor to
withhold amounts from its billings until
a reserve is set aside in an amount that
the Contracting Officer considers
necessary to protect the Government’s
interests. The Contracting Officer may
require a withhold of 5 percent of the
amounts due under paragraph (a), but
the total amount withheld for the
contract shall not exceed $50,000. The
amounts withheld shall be retained
until the Contractor executes and
delivers the release required by
paragraph (f) of this clause.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Confirmation of HUBZone Certification
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(Councils) have agreed to an interim
rule amending the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to clarify that prime
contractors must confirm that a
subcontractor representing itself as a
Historically Underutilized Business
Zone (HUBZone) small business
concern is certified, consistent with the
requirements of 15 U.S.C. 632 et seq., as
amended.
DATES: Effective Date: July 27, 2005.
Comment Date: Interested parties
should submit comments to the FAR
Secretariat at the address shown below
on or before September 26, 2005 to be
considered in the formulation of a final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by FAC 2005–05, FAR case
E:\FR\FM\27JYR3.SGM
27JYR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 27, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43580-43581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14668]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 14, 32, and 52
[FAC 2005-05; FAR Case 2004-003; Item III]
RIN 9000-AJ94
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Payment Withholding
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule
amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) by removing the
mandatory requirement that a contracting officer withhold 5 percent of
the payments due under a time-and-materials contract, unless it is
necessary to withhold payment to protect the Government's interest or
otherwise prescribed in the contract schedule. The final rule also
amends FAR guidance that requires the use of a contract modification to
withhold payment and to state that the withhold is to be made by the
contractor.
DATES: Effective Date: August 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat at (202) 501-4755
for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For
clarification of content, contact Mr. Jeremy Olson, at (202) 501-3221.
Please cite FAC 2005-05, FAR case 2004-003.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register at 69 FR 29838, May 25, 2004, with request for public
comments. The proposed rule would permit contracting officers to use
their judgment regarding whether to withhold payments under time-and-
materials and labor-hour contracts so that the withhold would be
applied only when necessary to protect the Government's interests. The
proposed rule also made it clear that normally there should not be a
need to withhold payments when dealing with contractual release
requirements in a timely manner. Six respondents submitted comments on
the proposed FAR rule. Three of the six respondents supported the
proposed rule, two of the six respondents supported it but with certain
additional changes that would align it with the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulations Supplement (DFARS) rule that was published in
the Federal Register at 68 FR 69631, December 15, 2003, and one of the
six respondents requested clarification. A discussion of the comments
is provided below. The Councils considered all comments and concluded
that the proposed rule should be converted to a final rule with changes
to the proposed rule. Differences between the proposed rule and final
rule are discussed in Comments 1 and 2, below.
Align With DFARS
1. Comment: While five respondents supported the proposed rule, two
stated that it is not consistent with the changes to relax the
requirements included in the DFARS rule published in the Federal
Register at 68 FR 69631, December 15, 2003. That rule stated that, if
it was necessary to withhold payment to protect the Government's
interest, the contracting officer would issue a modification requiring
the contractor to withhold 5 percent of the amount due, up to a maximum
of $50,000. One of the respondents stated the DFARS guidance should be
applicable Governmentwide ``because requiring withholds to protect the
interests of the Government is a serious matter, necessitating, in our
opinion, the execution of a formal contract modification.'' In
addition, the same respondent believes that, in most situations, it
would be more efficient and less costly for both contractors and the
Government if contractors take the withhold prior to submission of
their invoices.
Councils' response: Concur. The Councils believes that, based on
the analysis performed for the DFARS rule, it would be more efficient
and less costly for both contractors and the Government if contractors
take the withhold prior to the submission of their vouchers. In
addition, in order to make it clear that the Government is exercising
its right to a payment withhold to protect its interests, a contract
modification should be issued requiring the withhold of payment under
time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts. Therefore, the Councils
have revised the guidance at FAR 32.111(a)(7)(iii) and the clause at
FAR 52.232-7(a)(2) to require the use of a modification to withhold
payment and to allow for the withhold to be made by the contractor
instead of by the Government payment office. The Councils note that
this clause does not preclude the Government from withholding other
amounts due to non-performance, delivery of non-conforming goods, or
other failure(s) to comply with contract requirements.
Task Order Versus Entire Contract
2. Comment: A respondent stated that the proposed rule is unclear
as to whether the $50,000 ceiling on withholding applies to an
individual task or to an entire contract. It recommended the proposed
rule be clarified to identify the basis for application of the ceiling.
The respondent added that it had previously recommended in an audit
report that the $50,000 ceiling be applied to each order where orders
are closed separately. The respondent's recommendation is based on the
belief that the clarification will assist contracting officers in
performing their jobs.
Councils' response: The Councils agree that it would assist both
contractors and the Government if the proposed rule were clarified as
to whether the withhold ceiling applies to an entire contract or to
individual orders. Such a clarification would reduce any possible
confusion by either party as to the applicability of the ceiling and
thus remove the potential for disagreements. The Councils agree that
the withhold ceiling applies to the entire contract. Therefore, the
Councils have revised the guidance at FAR 32.111(a)(7)(iii) and the
clause at FAR 52.232-7(a)(2) to clarify that the withhold ceiling
applies to the total contract.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule applies only
to time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts. Time-and-
[[Page 43581]]
materials or labor-hour contracts with small business represent only
approximately 2 percent of all contracts. In addition, the rule eases
the impact of the current FAR by permitting the contracting officer to
use judgment in deciding whether to withhold payments, thus the number
of contracts affected is a subset of the 2 percent figure. This change
is expected to have a small but beneficial impact on small businesses.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 14, 32, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: July 20, 2005.
Julia B. Wise,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
0
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 14, 32, and 52 as set
forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 14, 32, and 52 is revised to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 14--SEALED BIDDING
14.408-3 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 14.408-3 in paragraph (b) by removing ``See
32.111(c)(1),'' and adding ``See 32.111(b)(1),'' in its place.
PART 32--CONTRACT FINANCING
0
3. Amend section 32.111 by--
0
a. Removing from the end of paragraph (a)(5) the word ``and'';
0
b. Removing the period from the end of paragraph (a)(6) and adding ``;
and'' in its place;
0
c. Adding paragraph (a)(7);
0
d. Removing paragraph (b); and
0
e. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as (b) and (c), respectively.
The added text reads as follows:
32.111 Contract clauses for non-commercial purchases.
(a) * * *
(7) The clause at 52.232-7, Payments under Time-and-Materials and
Labor-Hour Contracts, in solicitations and contracts when a time-and-
materials or labor-hour contract is contemplated.
(i) If the nature of the work to be performed requires the
contractor to furnish material that is regularly sold to the general
public in the normal course of business by the contractor and the price
is under the limitations prescribed in 16.601(b)(3), the contracting
officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.
(ii) If a labor-hour contract is contemplated, and if no specific
reimbursement for materials furnished is intended, the contracting
officer may use the clause with its Alternate II.
(iii) If the contracting officer determines that it is necessary to
withhold payment to protect the Government's interests, paragraph
(a)(2) of the clause permits the contracting officer to unilaterally
issue a modification requiring the contractor to withhold 5 percent of
amounts due, up to a maximum of $50,000 under the contract. The
contracting officer shall ensure that the modification specifies the
percentage and total amount of the withhold payment. Normally, there
should be no need to withhold payment for a contractor with a record of
timely submittal of the release discharging the Government from all
liabilities, obligations, and claims, as required by paragraph (f) of
the clause.
* * * * *
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
4. Amend section 52.232-7 by--
0
a. Removing from the introductory text ``32.111(b)'' and adding
``32.111(a)(7)'' in its place;
0
b. Revising the date of the clause; and
0
c. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
The revised text reads as follows:
52.232-7 Payments under Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts.
* * * * *
PAYMENTS UNDER TIME-AND-MATERIALS AND LABOR-HOUR CONTRACTS (AUG 2005)
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) Unless otherwise prescribed in the Schedule, the Contracting
Officer may unilaterally issue a contract modification requiring the
Contractor to withhold amounts from its billings until a reserve is set
aside in an amount that the Contracting Officer considers necessary to
protect the Government's interests. The Contracting Officer may require
a withhold of 5 percent of the amounts due under paragraph (a), but the
total amount withheld for the contract shall not exceed $50,000. The
amounts withheld shall be retained until the Contractor executes and
delivers the release required by paragraph (f) of this clause.
* * * * *
52.232-8 [Amended]
0
5. In the introductory text of section 52.232-8, remove
``32.111(c)(1)'' and add ``32.111(b)(1)'' in its place.
52.232-9 [Amended]
0
6. In the introductory text of section 52.232-9, remove
``32.111(c)(2)'' and add ``32.111(b)(2)'' in its place.
52.232-10 [Amended]
0
7. In the introductory text of section 52.232-10, remove
``32.111(d)(1)'' and add ``32.111(c)(1)'' in its place.
52.232-11 [Amended]
0
8. In the introductory text of section 52.232-11, remove
``32.111(d)(2)'' and add ``32.111(c)(2)'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 05-14668 Filed 7-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S