Adequacy of Indiana Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Program, 43105-43106 [05-14734]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
unidentified inmates, or for no
expressed reason.
(d) Staff concern. Based on evidence,
staff believe your safety may be
seriously jeopardized by placement in
the general population.
§ 541.28 How will my placement in the
SHU as a protection case be reviewed?
(a) Staff investigation. Whenever you
are placed in the SHU as a protection
case, whether requested by you or staff,
an investigation will occur to verify the
reasons for your placement.
(b) Inmate consents. If you consent to
placement in the SHU as a protection
case, you will be reviewed as an
ordinary administrative detention case
so long as reasons exist to support your
placement, or while an investigation is
pending to verify the reasons for your
placement.
(c) Inmate contests. If you contest
your placement in the SHU as a
protection case, you will receive a
hearing according to the procedural
requirements of § 541.26(b) within
seven calendar days of your placement.
Additionally, if you feel at any time
your placement in the SHU as a
protection case is unnecessary, you may
request a hearing under this section. If
you remain in administrative detention
status following such a hearing, you will
be periodically reviewed as an ordinary
administrative detention case under
§ 541.26.
§ 541.29 What happens if staff verify my
need for protection?
If a staff investigation verifies your
need for placement in the SHU as a
protection case, you may remain in the
SHU or be transferred to another
institution where your status as a
protection case may not be necessary, at
the Warden’s discretion.
§ 541.30 What happens if staff cannot
verify my status as a protection case?
If a staff investigation fails to verify
your need for placement in the SHU as
a protection case, you will be instructed
to return to the general population. If
you refuse to return to the general
population under these circumstances,
you may be subject to disciplinary
action.
§ 541.31 What are the conditions of
confinement in the SHU?
Your living conditions in the SHU
will meet or exceed standards for
healthy and humane treatment,
including, but not limited to, the
following specific conditions:
(a) Environment. Your living quarters
will be well-ventilated, adequately
lighted, appropriately heated, and
maintained in a sanitary condition.
VerDate jul<14>2003
23:06 Jul 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
(b) Cell Occupancy. Your living
quarters will ordinarily house only the
amount of occupants for which it is
designed. The Warden, however, may
authorize more occupants so long as
adequate standards can be maintained.
(c) Clothing. You will receive
adequate institution clothing, including
footwear, while housed in the SHU. You
will be provided necessary
opportunities to exchange clothing and/
or have it washed.
(d) Bedding. You will receive a
mattress, blankets, a pillow, and linens
for sleeping. You will receive necessary
opportunities to exchange linens.
(e) Food. You will receive
nutritionally adequate meals.
(f) Personal hygiene. You will have
access to a wash basin and toilet. You
will receive personal items necessary to
maintain an acceptable level of personal
hygiene, for example, toilet tissue, soap,
toothbrush and cleanser, shaving
utensils, etc. You will ordinarily have
an opportunity to shower and shave at
least three times per week. You will
have access to hair care services as
necessary.
(g) Exercise. You will receive the
opportunity to exercise outside your
individual quarters at least five hours
per week, ordinarily on different days in
one-hour periods. You can be denied
these exercise periods for a week at a
time by order of the Warden if it is
determined that your use of exercise
privileges threatens safety, security, and
orderly operation of a correctional
facility, or public safety.
(h) Personal property. In either status,
your amount of personal property may
be limited for reasons of fire safety or
sanitation.
(1) In administrative detention status
you are ordinarily allowed a reasonable
amount of personal property and access
to the commissary.
(2) In disciplinary segregation status
your personal property will be
impounded, with the exception of
limited reading/writing materials, and
religious articles. Also, your
commissary privileges may be limited.
(i) Correspondence. You will receive
correspondence privileges according to
Part 540, Subpart B.
(j) Telephone. You will receive
telephone privileges according to Part
540, Subpart I.
(k) Visiting. You will receive visiting
privileges according to Part 540, Subpart
D.
(l) Legal Activities. You will receive
an opportunity to perform personal legal
activities according to Part 543, Subpart
B.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43105
(m) Staff monitoring. You will be
monitored by staff assigned to the SHU,
including program and unit team staff.
(n) Programming Activities. In
administrative detention status, you will
have access to programming activities to
the extent safety, security, orderly
operation of a correctional facility, or
public safety are not jeopardized. In
disciplinary segregation status, your
participation in programming activities,
e.g., educational programs, may be
suspended.
(o) Administrative remedy program.
You can submit a formal grievance
challenging any aspect of your
confinement in the SHU through the
Administrative Remedy Program, 28
CFR part 542, subpart B.
§ 541.32 What medical and mental health
care will I receive in the SHU?
(a) Medical Care. A health services
staff member will visit you daily to
provide necessary medical care.
Emergency medical care is always
available.
(b) Mental Health Care. After every 30
calendar days of continuous placement
in either administrative detention or
disciplinary segregation status, mental
health staff will examine you, including
a personal interview. Emergency mental
health care is always available.
§ 541.33
SHU?
When will I be released from the
(a) Administrative detention status.
You will be released from
administrative detention status when
the reasons for your placement no
longer exist.
(b) Disciplinary segregation status.
You will be released from disciplinary
segregation status after satisfying the
sanction imposed by the DHO. The SRO
may release you earlier if it is
determined you no longer require
disciplinary segregation status.
[FR Doc. 05–14637 Filed 7–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 239 and 258
[FRL–7940–9]
Adequacy of Indiana Municipal Solid
Waste Landfill Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 5 is proposing to
approve a modification to Indiana’s
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
43106
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
approved municipal solid waste landfill
(MSWLF) permit program. The
modification allows the State to issue
research, development and
demonstration (RD&D) permits to
owners and operators of MSWLF units
in accordance with its state law.
DATES: All Comments on Indiana’s
application for approval of its research,
development and demonstration permit
modification must be received by U.S.
EPA Region 5 by the close of business
on August 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Susan Mooney, Waste
Management Branch (Mail code: DW–
8J), U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604,
telephone: 312/886–3585. Comments
may also be submitted electronically to:
mooney.susan@epa.gov or by facsimile
at (312) 353–4788. You may examine
copies of the relevant portions of
Indiana’s regulations during normal
business hours at EPA Region 5.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Mooney, Waste Management
Branch (Mail code: DW–8J), U.S. EPA
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604, telephone: 312/886–
3585, email: mooney.susan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On March 22, 2004, EPA issued a
final rule amending the municipal solid
waste landfill criteria in 40 CFR part
258 to allow for research, development
and demonstration (RD&D) permits. (69
FR 13242). This rule allows for
variances from specified criteria for a
limited period of time, to be
implemented through state-issued
RD&D permits. RD&D permits are only
available in states with approved
MSWLF permit programs which have
been modified to incorporate RD&D
permit authority. While States are not
required to seek approval for this new
provision, those States that are
interested in providing RD&D permits to
owners and operators of MSWLFs must
seek approval from EPA before issuing
such permits. Approval procedures for
new provisions of 40 CFR Part 258 are
outlined in 40 CFR 239.12.
Indiana’s MSWLF permit program
was approved on October 8, 1996 (61 FR
52791). On May 11, 2005, Indiana
applied for approval of its RD&D permit
provisions. Indiana submitted its rules
under 329 IAC 10–11–6.5 for review.
B. Decision
After a thorough review, EPA Region
5 is proposing that Indiana’s RD&D
permit provisions as defined under
Indiana rule 329 IAC 10–11–6.5 are
VerDate jul<14>2003
23:06 Jul 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
adequate to ensure compliance with the
Federal criteria as defined at 40 CFR
258.4.
C. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action proposes to approve state
solid waste requirements pursuant to
RCRA Section 4005 and imposes no
federal requirements. Therefore, this
proposed rule complies with applicable
executive orders and statutory
provisions as follows: 1. Executive
Order 12866: Regulatory Planning
Review—The Office of Management and
Budget has exempted this proposed
action from its review under Executive
Order (EO) 12866; 2. Paperwork
Reduction Act—This proposed action
does not impose an information
collection burden under the Paperwork
Reduction Act; 3. Regulatory Flexibility
Act—After considering the economic
impacts of today’s proposed action on
small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, I certify that this
proposed action would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities; 4.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act—
Because this action proposes to approve
pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, this action does not
contain any unfunded mandate, or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Act; 5. Executive
Order 13132: Federalism—EO 13132
does not apply to this proposed action
because this proposed action will not
have federalism implications (i.e., there
are no substantial direct effects on
states, on the relationship between the
national government and states, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between federal and
state governments); 6. Executive Order
13175: Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments—EO
13175 does not apply to this proposed
action because it will not have tribal
implications (i.e., there are no
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
federal government and Indian tribes).
7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children from Environmental Health &
Safety Risks—This proposed action is
not subject to EO 13045 because it is not
economically significant and is not
based on health or safety risks; 8.
Executive Order 13211: Actions that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use—This proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
action is not subject to EO 13211
because it is not a significant regulatory
action as defined in EO 12866; 9.
National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act—This provision
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. This proposed action does not
involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA did not consider the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 239
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Intergovernmental relations, Waste
treatment and disposal.
40 CFR Part 258
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment disposal,
Water pollution control.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of section 2002, 4005 and 4010(c)
of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended,
42 U.S.C. 6912, 6945 and 6949(a).
Dated: July 7, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA,
Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05–14734 Filed 7–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–7943–4]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of intent to delete the
Red Oak City Landfill Superfund site
(site) from the National Priorities List
(NPL).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA, Region VII, is
issuing a notice of intent to delete the
Red Oak City Landfill Superfund site
(site) located near Red Oak, Iowa, from
the NPL and requests public comments
on this notice of intent. The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 26, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43105-43106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14734]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 239 and 258
[FRL-7940-9]
Adequacy of Indiana Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 5 is
proposing to approve a modification to Indiana's
[[Page 43106]]
approved municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) permit program. The
modification allows the State to issue research, development and
demonstration (RD&D) permits to owners and operators of MSWLF units in
accordance with its state law.
DATES: All Comments on Indiana's application for approval of its
research, development and demonstration permit modification must be
received by U.S. EPA Region 5 by the close of business on August 25,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to Susan Mooney, Waste
Management Branch (Mail code: DW-8J), U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, telephone: 312/886-3585. Comments
may also be submitted electronically to: mooney.susan@epa.gov or by
facsimile at (312) 353-4788. You may examine copies of the relevant
portions of Indiana's regulations during normal business hours at EPA
Region 5.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Mooney, Waste Management Branch
(Mail code: DW-8J), U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604, telephone: 312/886-3585, email:
mooney.susan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On March 22, 2004, EPA issued a final rule amending the municipal
solid waste landfill criteria in 40 CFR part 258 to allow for research,
development and demonstration (RD&D) permits. (69 FR 13242). This rule
allows for variances from specified criteria for a limited period of
time, to be implemented through state-issued RD&D permits. RD&D permits
are only available in states with approved MSWLF permit programs which
have been modified to incorporate RD&D permit authority. While States
are not required to seek approval for this new provision, those States
that are interested in providing RD&D permits to owners and operators
of MSWLFs must seek approval from EPA before issuing such permits.
Approval procedures for new provisions of 40 CFR Part 258 are outlined
in 40 CFR 239.12.
Indiana's MSWLF permit program was approved on October 8, 1996 (61
FR 52791). On May 11, 2005, Indiana applied for approval of its RD&D
permit provisions. Indiana submitted its rules under 329 IAC 10-11-6.5
for review.
B. Decision
After a thorough review, EPA Region 5 is proposing that Indiana's
RD&D permit provisions as defined under Indiana rule 329 IAC 10-11-6.5
are adequate to ensure compliance with the Federal criteria as defined
at 40 CFR 258.4.
C. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action proposes to approve state solid waste requirements
pursuant to RCRA Section 4005 and imposes no federal requirements.
Therefore, this proposed rule complies with applicable executive orders
and statutory provisions as follows: 1. Executive Order 12866:
Regulatory Planning Review--The Office of Management and Budget has
exempted this proposed action from its review under Executive Order
(EO) 12866; 2. Paperwork Reduction Act--This proposed action does not
impose an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction
Act; 3. Regulatory Flexibility Act--After considering the economic
impacts of today's proposed action on small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, I certify that this proposed action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities; 4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act--Because this action proposes
to approve pre-existing requirements under state law and does not
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state
law, this action does not contain any unfunded mandate, or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Act; 5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism--EO 13132
does not apply to this proposed action because this proposed action
will not have federalism implications (i.e., there are no substantial
direct effects on states, on the relationship between the national
government and states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between federal and state governments); 6. Executive
Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments--EO 13175 does not apply to this proposed action because it
will not have tribal implications (i.e., there are no substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes). 7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children from Environmental Health & Safety Risks--This proposed action
is not subject to EO 13045 because it is not economically significant
and is not based on health or safety risks; 8. Executive Order 13211:
Actions that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use--
This proposed action is not subject to EO 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in EO 12866; 9. National
Technology Transfer Advancement Act--This provision directs EPA to use
voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do
so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials
specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed action does not involve technical
standards. Therefore, EPA did not consider the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 239
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Intergovernmental relations, Waste treatment and disposal.
40 CFR Part 258
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment disposal,
Water pollution control.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section
2002, 4005 and 4010(c) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended,
42 U.S.C. 6912, 6945 and 6949(a).
Dated: July 7, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-14734 Filed 7-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P