Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the Florida Scrub-jay Resulting From Construction of a Single-Family Residence in Sarasota County, FL, 42584-42585 [05-14579]
Download as PDF
42584
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Notices
Development of a hydroelectric facility
will not change or modify the operation
of Jordanelle Dam and Reservoir.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information on matters
related to this Federal Register notice
can be obtained from Mr. Reed R.
Murray, Deputy Program Director, CUP
Completion Act Office, Department of
the Interior, 302 East 1860 South, Provo,
UT 84606–6154, (801) 379–1237,
rmurray@uc.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Central Utah Project’s Bonneville Unit,
located in northern Utah, was
authorized for construction, including
hydroelectric power, by the Colorado
River Storage Project (CRSP) Act of
April 11, 1956 (ch. 203, 70 Stat. 105)
(CRSPA). The construction and
operation of a hydroelectric generating
facility below Jordanelle Dam was
contemplated in the 1979 Municipal
and Industrial System (M&I) Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
The 1987 Final Supplement to the M&I
Final EIS deferred construction of a
powerplant at Jordanelle awaiting nonfederal participation. The potential to
produce hydropower was incorporated
in the construction of Jordanelle Dam.
The Final EA and FONSI updates the
1987 Final Supplement to the M&I Final
EIS regarding construction of a
powerplant at Jordanelle Dam. The
operation of Jordanelle Dam and
Reservoir will remain the same as
described in the 1987 Final Supplement
to the Final EIS and the 2004 Final EIS
for the Utah Lake System.
The Central Utah Project Completion
Act (CUPCA), comprised of Titles II–VI
of the Act of October 30, 1992 (106 Stat.
4600, Public Law 102–575) authorized
the Secretary to request appropriations
for the construction of other features of
the Bonneville Unit. Section 208 of the
CUPCA provides that power generation
facilities associated with the CUP be
developed and operated in accordance
with the CRSPA, which explicitly
embodies all Reclamation law except as
otherwise provided in the CRSPA. In
accordance with a Federal Register
notice published July 2, 1999 (Volume
64, Number 127, Pages 36030–36032),
Interior, in consultation with the
Western Area Power Administration,
selected the joint proposal of the
District/HL&P to develop non-federal
hydroelectric power at Jordanelle Dam
through a lease of power privilege. A
lease of power privilege is an alternative
to Federal hydroelectric power
development. A lease of power privilege
grants a non-federal entity the right to
utilize, consistent with CUP purposes,
water power head and storage at and/or
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:21 Jul 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
operationally in conjunction with the
CUP, for non-federal electric power
generation and sale by the entity. The
general authority for lease of power
privilege under Reclamation law
includes, among others, the Town Sites
and Power Development Act of 1906 (43
U.S.C. 522) and the Reclamation Project
Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)) (1939
Act). The intent to hold public
negotiations for the lease of power
privilege contract was announced in the
Federal Register on October 25, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 207, Pages 63879–
63880). The lease of power privilege
contract was successfully negotiated
and will be executed by all parties.
Power developed by the Jordanelle
hydroelectric generation facility will be
purchased by HL&P and sold to their
customers.
Dated: July 15, 2005.
Ronald Johnston,
Program Director, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 05–14580 Filed 7–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of an Application for an
Incidental Take Permit for the Florida
Scrub-jay Resulting From Construction
of a Single-Family Residence in
Sarasota County, FL
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Results Home Buyer Inc.
(Applicant) requests an incidental take
permit (ITP) pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as
amended (Act). The Applicant
anticipates removal of about 0.18 acre of
Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma
coerulescens) (scrub-jay) foraging,
sheltering, and possibly nesting habitat,
incidental to lot preparation for the
construction of a single-family residence
and supporting infrastructure in Venice,
Sarasota County, Florida (project). The
take of one family of scrub-jays,
consisting of up to four individuals,
could occur as a result of the
Applicant’s proposed activities.
The Applicant’s Habitat Conservation
Plan (HCP) describes the mitigation and
minimization measures proposed to
address the effects of the project to the
scrub-jay. These measures are outlined
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section below. The Service has
determined that the Applicant’s
proposal, including the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mitigation and minimization measures,
will individually and cumulatively have
a minor or negligible effect on the
species covered in the HCP. Therefore,
the ITP is a ‘‘low-effect’’ project and
qualifies as a categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), as provided by the
Department of Interior Manual (516 DM
2, Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6, Appendix
1). The Service announces the
availability of the ITP application, HCP,
and Screening Form for Low-Effect HCP
Determinations for this incidental take
application. Copies of the ITP
application, HCP, and Screening Form
may be obtained by making a request to
the Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
Requests must be in writing to be
processed. This notice is provided
pursuant to section 10 of the Act and
NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
DATES: Written comments on the ITP
application, accompanying HCP, and
Screening Form should be sent to the
Service’s Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES) and should be received on
or before August 24, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review
the application, HCP, and Screening
Form may obtain a copy by writing the
Service’s Southeast Regional Office at
the address below. Please reference
permit number TE098966–0 in such
requests. Documents will also be
available for public inspection by
appointment during normal business
hours at the Southeast Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta,
Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered
Species Permits), or the South Florida
Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero
Beach, Florida, 32960–3559 (Attn: Field
Supervisor).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Dell, Regional HCP Coordinator,
Southeast Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES above), telephone: 404–679–
7313, facsimile: 404–679–7081; or Mr.
George Dennis, Fish and Wildlife
Ecologist, South Florida Ecological
Services Office (see ADDRESSES above),
telephone: 772–562–3909, ext. 309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you
wish to comment, you may submit
comments by any one of several
methods. Please reference permit
number TE098966–0 in such comments.
You may mail comments to the
Service’s Southeast Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES). You may also comment via
the internet to david_dell@fws.gov.
Please submit comments over the
internet as an ASCII file, avoiding the
use of special characters and any form
of encryption. Please also include your
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Notices
name and return address in your e-mail
message. If you do not receive a
confirmation from us that we have
received your e-mail message, contact
us directly at either telephone number
listed above (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Finally, you may
hand-deliver comments to either Service
office listed above (see ADDRESSES). Our
practice is to make comments, including
names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from
the administrative record. We will
honor such requests to the extent
allowable by law. There may also be
other circumstances in which we would
withhold from the administrative record
a respondent’s identity, as allowable by
law. If you wish us to withhold your
name and address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. We will not, however,
consider anonymous comments. We
will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
The Florida scrub-jay is
geographically isolated from other
species of scrub-jays found in Mexico
and the western United States. The
scrub-jay is found exclusively in
peninsular Florida and is restricted to
xeric uplands (well-drained, sandy soil
habitats supporting a growth of oakdominated scrub). Increasing urban and
agricultural development has resulted in
habitat loss and fragmentation, which
has adversely affected the distribution
and numbers of scrub-jays. The total
estimated population is between 7,000
and 11,000 individuals.
The decline in the number and
distribution of scrub-jays in west-central
Florida has been exacerbated by
tremendous urban growth in the past 50
years. Historical commercial and
residential development has occurred
on the dry soils which previously
supported scrub-jay habitat. Based on
existing soils data, much of the historic
and current scrub-jay habitat of coastal
west-central Florida occurs proximal to
the current shoreline and larger river
basins. Much of this area of Florida was
settled early because few wetlands
restricted urban and agricultural
development. Due to the effects of urban
and agricultural development over the
past 100 years, much of the remaining
scrub-jay habitat is now relatively small
and isolated. What remains is largely
degraded, due to interruption of the
natural fire regime that is needed to
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:21 Jul 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
maintain xeric uplands in conditions
suitable for scrub-jays.
A 2004 survey reported that the
project area was being utilized by a
family of scrub-jays. The scrub-jays
using the site and adjacent properties
are part of a larger complex of scrub-jays
located in a matrix of urban and natural
settings in southern Sarasota County.
Scrub-jays in urban areas are
particularly vulnerable and typically do
not successfully produce young that
survive to adulthood. Persistent urban
growth in this area will likely result in
further reductions in the amount of
suitable habitat for scrub-jays.
Increasing urban pressures are also
likely to result in the continued
degradation of scrub-jay habitat as fire
exclusion slowly results in vegetative
overgrowth. Thus, over the long term,
scrub-jays are unlikely to persist in
urban settings, and conservation efforts
for this species should target acquisition
and management of large parcels of land
outside the direct influence of
urbanization.
Construction of the project’s
infrastructure and facilities will result
in harm to scrub-jays, incidental to the
carrying out of these otherwise lawful
activities. Habitat alteration associated
with the proposed residential
construction will reduce the availability
of foraging, sheltering, and possible
nesting habitat for one family of scrubjays. The Applicant proposes to conduct
clearing activities outside of the nesting
season. The Applicant proposes to
replace any scrub oaks and wax myrtles
that might be removed during land
clearing. Wherever possible, native
vegetation will be used in landscaping.
The Applicant proposes to mitigate
the take of scrub-jays through
contribution of $15,300 to the Sarasota
County Scrub-jay Mitigation Plan Fund
administered by Sarasota County. Funds
in this account are earmarked for use in
the conservation and recovery of scrubjays and may include habitat
acquisition, restoration, and
management. The $15,300 is maximum
extent of mitigation practicable for the
Applicant.
The Service has determined that the
HCP is a low-effect plan that is
categorically excluded from further
NEPA analysis, and does not require the
preparation of an EA or EIS. This
preliminary information may be revised
based on our review of any public
comment we receive in response to this
notice. Low-effect HCPs are those
involving: (1) minor or negligible effects
on federally listed or candidate species
and their habitats, and (2) minor or
negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources. The
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42585
Applicant’s HCP qualifies for the
following reasons:
1. Approval of the HCP would result
in minor or negligible effects on the
Florida scrub-jay population as a whole.
The Service does not anticipate
significant direct or cumulative effects
to the Florida scrub-jay population as a
result of the project.
2. Approval of the HCP would not
have adverse effects on known unique
geographic, historic, or cultural sites, or
involve unique or unknown
environmental risks.
3. Approval of the HCP would not
result in any significant adverse effects
on public health or safety.
4. The project does not require
compliance with Executive Order 11988
(Floodplain Management), Executive
Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands), or
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,
nor does it threaten to violate a Federal,
State, local, or tribal law or requirement
imposed for the protection of the
environment.
5. Approval of the Plan would not
establish a precedent for future actions
or represent a decision in principle
about future actions with potentially
significant environmental effects.
The Service has determined that
approval of the Plan qualifies as a
categorical exclusion under NEPA, as
provided by the Department of the
Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1,
and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). Therefore,
no further NEPA documentation will be
prepared.
The Service will evaluate the HCP
and comments submitted thereon to
determine whether the application
meets the requirements of section 10(a)
of the Act. If it is determined that those
requirements are met, the ITP will be
issued for incidental take of the Florida
scrub-jay. The Service will also evaluate
whether issuance of the section
10(a)(1)(B) ITP complies with section 7
of the Act by conducting an intraService section 7 consultation. The
results of this consultation, in
combination with the above findings,
will be used in the final analysis to
determine whether or not to issue the
ITP.
Dated: July 10, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 05–14579 Filed 7–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 141 (Monday, July 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42584-42585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14579]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the
Florida Scrub-jay Resulting From Construction of a Single-Family
Residence in Sarasota County, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Results Home Buyer Inc. (Applicant) requests an incidental
take permit (ITP) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). The
Applicant anticipates removal of about 0.18 acre of Florida scrub-jay
(Aphelocoma coerulescens) (scrub-jay) foraging, sheltering, and
possibly nesting habitat, incidental to lot preparation for the
construction of a single-family residence and supporting infrastructure
in Venice, Sarasota County, Florida (project). The take of one family
of scrub-jays, consisting of up to four individuals, could occur as a
result of the Applicant's proposed activities.
The Applicant's Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) describes the
mitigation and minimization measures proposed to address the effects of
the project to the scrub-jay. These measures are outlined in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. The Service has determined
that the Applicant's proposal, including the proposed mitigation and
minimization measures, will individually and cumulatively have a minor
or negligible effect on the species covered in the HCP. Therefore, the
ITP is a ``low-effect'' project and qualifies as a categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
provided by the Department of Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1 and
516 DM 6, Appendix 1). The Service announces the availability of the
ITP application, HCP, and Screening Form for Low-Effect HCP
Determinations for this incidental take application. Copies of the ITP
application, HCP, and Screening Form may be obtained by making a
request to the Regional Office (see ADDRESSES). Requests must be in
writing to be processed. This notice is provided pursuant to section 10
of the Act and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
DATES: Written comments on the ITP application, accompanying HCP, and
Screening Form should be sent to the Service's Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES) and should be received on or before August 24, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the application, HCP, and
Screening Form may obtain a copy by writing the Service's Southeast
Regional Office at the address below. Please reference permit number
TE098966-0 in such requests. Documents will also be available for
public inspection by appointment during normal business hours at the
Southeast Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered Species
Permits), or the South Florida Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3559
(Attn: Field Supervisor).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Dell, Regional HCP
Coordinator, Southeast Regional Office (see ADDRESSES above),
telephone: 404-679-7313, facsimile: 404-679-7081; or Mr. George Dennis,
Fish and Wildlife Ecologist, South Florida Ecological Services Office
(see ADDRESSES above), telephone: 772-562-3909, ext. 309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to comment, you may submit
comments by any one of several methods. Please reference permit number
TE098966-0 in such comments. You may mail comments to the Service's
Southeast Regional Office (see ADDRESSES). You may also comment via the
internet to david_dell@fws.gov. Please submit comments over the
internet as an ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters and
any form of encryption. Please also include your
[[Page 42585]]
name and return address in your e-mail message. If you do not receive a
confirmation from us that we have received your e-mail message, contact
us directly at either telephone number listed above (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Finally, you may hand-deliver comments to either
Service office listed above (see ADDRESSES). Our practice is to make
comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available
for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents
may request that we withhold their home addresses from the
administrative record. We will honor such requests to the extent
allowable by law. There may also be other circumstances in which we
would withhold from the administrative record a respondent's identity,
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and address,
you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We
will not, however, consider anonymous comments. We will make all
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
The Florida scrub-jay is geographically isolated from other species
of scrub-jays found in Mexico and the western United States. The scrub-
jay is found exclusively in peninsular Florida and is restricted to
xeric uplands (well-drained, sandy soil habitats supporting a growth of
oak-dominated scrub). Increasing urban and agricultural development has
resulted in habitat loss and fragmentation, which has adversely
affected the distribution and numbers of scrub-jays. The total
estimated population is between 7,000 and 11,000 individuals.
The decline in the number and distribution of scrub-jays in west-
central Florida has been exacerbated by tremendous urban growth in the
past 50 years. Historical commercial and residential development has
occurred on the dry soils which previously supported scrub-jay habitat.
Based on existing soils data, much of the historic and current scrub-
jay habitat of coastal west-central Florida occurs proximal to the
current shoreline and larger river basins. Much of this area of Florida
was settled early because few wetlands restricted urban and
agricultural development. Due to the effects of urban and agricultural
development over the past 100 years, much of the remaining scrub-jay
habitat is now relatively small and isolated. What remains is largely
degraded, due to interruption of the natural fire regime that is needed
to maintain xeric uplands in conditions suitable for scrub-jays.
A 2004 survey reported that the project area was being utilized by
a family of scrub-jays. The scrub-jays using the site and adjacent
properties are part of a larger complex of scrub-jays located in a
matrix of urban and natural settings in southern Sarasota County.
Scrub-jays in urban areas are particularly vulnerable and typically do
not successfully produce young that survive to adulthood. Persistent
urban growth in this area will likely result in further reductions in
the amount of suitable habitat for scrub-jays. Increasing urban
pressures are also likely to result in the continued degradation of
scrub-jay habitat as fire exclusion slowly results in vegetative
overgrowth. Thus, over the long term, scrub-jays are unlikely to
persist in urban settings, and conservation efforts for this species
should target acquisition and management of large parcels of land
outside the direct influence of urbanization.
Construction of the project's infrastructure and facilities will
result in harm to scrub-jays, incidental to the carrying out of these
otherwise lawful activities. Habitat alteration associated with the
proposed residential construction will reduce the availability of
foraging, sheltering, and possible nesting habitat for one family of
scrub-jays. The Applicant proposes to conduct clearing activities
outside of the nesting season. The Applicant proposes to replace any
scrub oaks and wax myrtles that might be removed during land clearing.
Wherever possible, native vegetation will be used in landscaping.
The Applicant proposes to mitigate the take of scrub-jays through
contribution of $15,300 to the Sarasota County Scrub-jay Mitigation
Plan Fund administered by Sarasota County. Funds in this account are
earmarked for use in the conservation and recovery of scrub-jays and
may include habitat acquisition, restoration, and management. The
$15,300 is maximum extent of mitigation practicable for the Applicant.
The Service has determined that the HCP is a low-effect plan that
is categorically excluded from further NEPA analysis, and does not
require the preparation of an EA or EIS. This preliminary information
may be revised based on our review of any public comment we receive in
response to this notice. Low-effect HCPs are those involving: (1) minor
or negligible effects on federally listed or candidate species and
their habitats, and (2) minor or negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources. The Applicant's HCP qualifies for
the following reasons:
1. Approval of the HCP would result in minor or negligible effects
on the Florida scrub-jay population as a whole. The Service does not
anticipate significant direct or cumulative effects to the Florida
scrub-jay population as a result of the project.
2. Approval of the HCP would not have adverse effects on known
unique geographic, historic, or cultural sites, or involve unique or
unknown environmental risks.
3. Approval of the HCP would not result in any significant adverse
effects on public health or safety.
4. The project does not require compliance with Executive Order
11988 (Floodplain Management), Executive Order 11990 (Protection of
Wetlands), or the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, nor does it
threaten to violate a Federal, State, local, or tribal law or
requirement imposed for the protection of the environment.
5. Approval of the Plan would not establish a precedent for future
actions or represent a decision in principle about future actions with
potentially significant environmental effects.
The Service has determined that approval of the Plan qualifies as a
categorical exclusion under NEPA, as provided by the Department of the
Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1, and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1).
Therefore, no further NEPA documentation will be prepared.
The Service will evaluate the HCP and comments submitted thereon to
determine whether the application meets the requirements of section
10(a) of the Act. If it is determined that those requirements are met,
the ITP will be issued for incidental take of the Florida scrub-jay.
The Service will also evaluate whether issuance of the section
10(a)(1)(B) ITP complies with section 7 of the Act by conducting an
intra-Service section 7 consultation. The results of this consultation,
in combination with the above findings, will be used in the final
analysis to determine whether or not to issue the ITP.
Dated: July 10, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 05-14579 Filed 7-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P