Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland (Formerly Rolls-Royce plc) Models Tay 650-15 and 651-54 Turbofan Engines, 42515-42517 [05-14574]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
SAR Submitted by: NAC
International, Inc.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis
Report for the NAC–UMS Universal
Storage System.
Docket Number: 72–1015.
Certificate Expiration Date: November
20, 2020.
Model Number: NAC–UMS.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of July, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Martin J. Virgilio,
Acting Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–14568 Filed 7–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001–NE–02–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland (Formerly Rolls-Royce
plc) Models Tay 650–15 and 651–54
Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for Rolls-Royce
Deutschland (formerly Rolls-Royce plc)
(RRD) models Tay 650–15 and 651–54
turbofan engines. That AD currently
requires borescope inspection of the
high pressure compressor (HPC) stage
12 disc assembly to detect damage
caused by HPC outlet guide vane (OGV)
retaining bolt failure, and replacement
of unserviceable parts with serviceable
parts. That AD also requires as
terminating action, the incorporation of
a new design retention arrangement for
the HPC OGV to prevent HPC OGV
retaining bolt failure. This proposed AD
would require the same actions but
extends the terminating action
compliance time for Tay 650–15
engines. This proposed AD would also
include references to later revisions of
two of the applicable RRD service
bulletins (SBs). This proposed AD
results from findings that the
terminating action compliance time for
Tay 650–15 engines can be extended.
We are proposing this AD to prevent an
uncontained failure of the HPC stage
11/12 disc spacer, which could result in
damage to the airplane.
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jul 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by September 23,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• By mail: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), New England
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2001–NE–
02–AD, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803–5299.
• By fax: (781) 238–7055.
• By e-mail: 9-aneadcomment@faa.gov.
You can get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31 Derby,
DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom; telephone
011–44–1332–242424; fax 011–44–
1332–249936.
You may examine the AD docket, by
appointment, at the FAA, New England
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803–
5299; telephone (781) 238–7747; fax
(781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘AD Docket No.
2001–NE–02–AD’’ in the subject line of
your comments. If you want us to
acknowledge receipt of your mailed
comments, send us a self-addressed,
stamped postcard with the docket
number written on it; we will datestamp your postcard and mail it back to
you. We specifically invite comments
on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. If a person contacts us
verbally, and that contact relates to a
substantive part of this proposed AD,
we will summarize the contact and
place the summary in the docket. We
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD Docket
(including any comments and service
information), by appointment, between
8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. See
ADDRESSES for the location.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42515
Discussion
On January 18, 2002, the FAA issued
AD 2002–01–29, Amendment 39–12624
(67 FR 4652, January 31, 2002). That AD
requires borescope inspection of the
HPC stage 12 disc assembly to detect
damage caused by HPC OGV retaining
bolt failure, and replacement of
unserviceable parts with serviceable
parts. That AD also requires as
terminating action, the incorporation of
a new design retention arrangement for
the HPC OGV, to prevent HPC OGV
retaining bolt failure.
Actions Since AD 2002–01–29 Was
Issued
Since we issued AD 2002–01–29, the
FAA and the Luftfhart Bundesamt
(LBA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Germany, reassessed the
time period allowed for incorporation of
the terminating action compliance time
for Tay 650–15 engines. Part of that
reassessment takes into consideration
the major reduction in flying time of the
Tay 650–15 airliner fleet, since
September 11, 2001. The FAA and LBA
concluded that the terminating action
compliance time for the Tay 650–15
engines can be safely extended by 25
months.
Special Flight Permits Paragraph
Removed
Paragraph (f) of the current AD, AD
2002–01–29, contains a paragraph
pertaining to special flight permits.
Even though this proposed AD does not
contain a similar paragraph, we have
made no changes with regard to the use
of special flight permits to operate the
airplane to a repair facility to do the
work required by this AD. In July 2002,
we published a new part 39 that
contains a general authority regarding
special flight permits and airworthiness
directives; see Docket No. FAA–2004–
8460, Amendment 39–9474 (69 FR
47998, July 22, 2002). Thus, when we
now supersede ADs we will not include
a specific paragraph on special flight
permits unless we want to limit the use
of that general authority granted in
section 39.23.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of RRD SB No. TAY–
72–1498, Revision 2, dated December
31, 2004. That SB describes procedures
for installing new design retaining and
locking hardware for the HPC OGV and
outer seal housing assembly. The LBA
classified this service bulletin as
mandatory and issued AD D–2004–365,
dated January 31, 2005, in order to
ensure the airworthiness of these RRD
engines in Germany.
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
42516
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Bilateral Agreement Information
This engine model is manufactured in
Germany and is type certificated for
operation in the United States under the
provisions of Section 21.29 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.29) and the applicable bilateral
airworthiness agreement. In keeping
with this bilateral airworthiness
agreement, the LBA has kept the FAA
informed of the situation described
above. We have examined the findings
of the LBA, reviewed all available
information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. Therefore, we are
proposing this AD, which would
require:
• Initial and repetitive borescope
inspections of the stage 12 rotor disc
assembly for damage due to failed HPC
OGV retaining bolts, and removal of
engine from service if damage is
observed on the stage 12 rotor disc.
• As terminating action to the
repetitive inspections, removal from
service of existing HPT rotor inner seal
support assembly, HP compressor outlet
guide vane (5-span), HP compressor
outlet guide vane (6-span), HP rotor
thrust bearing housing assembly, and
diffuser case assembly.
The proposed AD would require that
you do these actions using the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 400 Tay 650–15 and
651–54 turbofan engines of the affected
design in the worldwide fleet. We
estimate that 105 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry would be
affected by this proposed AD. We also
estimate that it would take about 3 work
hours per engine to perform the
proposed borescope inspection, and that
the average labor rate is $65 per work
hour. Required parts would cost about
$3,200 per engine. We estimate that one
third of the engines will have the parts
replaced at time of engine overhaul. We
also estimate that one third of the
engines will have the parts replaced
during an engine mid-life shop visit. We
also estimate that one third of the
engines will have the parts replaced at
an engine shop visit dedicated for these
parts replacements, at a cost of about
$90,000 per engine. Based on these
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jul 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
figures, we estimate the total cost of the
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be
$3,600,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this proposal and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy
of this summary by sending a request to
us at the address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘AD Docket No.
2001–NE–02–AD’’ in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–12624 (67 FR
4652, January 31, 2002) and by adding
a new airworthiness directive, to read as
follows:
Rolls-Royce Deutschland (formerly RollsRoyce plc): Docket No. 2001–NE–02–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by
September 23, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2002–01–29,
Amendment 39–12624.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce
Deutschland (formerly Rolls-Royce plc)
(RRD) models Tay 650–15 and 651–54
turbofan engines with high pressure
compressor (HPC) outlet guide vane (OGV)
retaining bolts part numbers (P/Ns) BLT3602,
DU909, and DU818 installed. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to Boeing
727 and Fokker F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from RRD relaxing the
terminating action compliance time for Tay
650–15 engines due to reassessment by RRD.
We are proposing this AD to prevent an
uncontained failure of the HPC stage 11/12
disc spacer, which could result in damage to
the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Inspection
(f) Perform a borescope inspection of the
rear side of the stage 12 rotor disc at or before
accumulating 8,000 cycles-since-new on the
OGV retaining bolts, or within 30 days from
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later. Use paragraph 3.A.(1) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of RRD
Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) Tay–72–
1483, Revision 2, dated October 20, 2000, to
do the inspection. If damage is observed on
the stage 12 rotor disc, remove the engine
from service.
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Thereafter, perform repetitive borescope
inspections of the rear side of the stage 12
rotor disc no earlier than 1,800 and no later
than 2,200 cycles-since-last-inspection, or no
later than 18 months since-last-inspection,
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
whichever occurs first. Use paragraph 3.A.(1)
of the Accomplishment Instructions of RRD
MSB Tay–72–1483, Revision 2, dated
October 20, 2000, to do the inspections. If
damage is observed on the stage 12 rotor disc,
remove the engine from service.
OGV Retaining Bolt Replacement
(h) For engines that had OGV bolts
replaced with new bolts P/Ns BLT3602,
DU909, and DU818 as specified in RRD SB
Tay–72–1484, dated November 15, 1999, or
Revision 1, dated December 17, 1999, the
initial and repetitive inspection
requirements, based on engine cycles-sincebolt installation, are the same as specified in
paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD.
Terminating Action
(i) As terminating action for the
inspections required by this AD, do the
following:
(1) Before November 1, 2007 for Tay 650–
15 engines, and before October 1, 2012 for
Tay 651–54 engines, remove from service the
parts listed in the following Table 1:
TABLE 1.—PARTS TO BE REMOVED
FROM SERVICE
Part No.
Part name
JR12314A ......
EU57842A ......
EU57843A ......
JR30962A ......
JR30568A ......
KB7106 ..........
EU12042 ........
DU818 ............
HPT Rotor Inner Seal Support Assembly.
HP Compressor Outlet
Guide Vane 5-Span.
HP Compressor Outlet
Guide Vane 6-Span.
HP Rotor Thrust Bearing
Housing Assembly.
Diffuser Case Assembly.
Tab Washer.
Retaining Lock Plate.
Hex Head Bolt.
(2) Information on removing these parts
from service can be found in RRD MSB Tay–
72–1498, dated October 20, 2000, or RRD
MSB Tay–72–1498, Revision 1, dated
December 1, 2000, or RRD SB Tay–72–1498,
Revision 2, dated December 31, 2004.
(j) After performing the actions specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD, the inspections
specified in paragraphs (f) through (h) of this
AD are no longer required.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(l) Luftfhart Bundesamt airworthiness
directive D–2004–365, dated January 31,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
July 18, 2005.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–14574 Filed 7–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Jul 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
20 CFR Part 320
RIN 3220–AB58
Electronic Filing of Reconsideration
Requests by Railroad Employers
Railroad Retirement Board.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Railroad Retirement
Board (Board) proposes to amend its
regulations to include the option of
electronic filing by railroad employers
of requests for reconsideration of initial
decisions under the Railroad
Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA).
Part 320 currently requires that
reconsideration requests be submitted in
writing. The proposed rule would allow
reconsideration requests to be made by
railroad employers either in writing or
electronically. In addition, §§ 320.10(c)
and 320.10(d) inadvertently contain
inaccurate references. This proposed
rule would correct those references.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address any comments
concerning this proposed rule to
Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board,
Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North
Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–
2092.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant General
General Counsel, (312) 751–4945, TTD
(312) 751–4701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part 320 of
the Board’s regulations deals generally
with administrative review of initial
determinations of claims or requests for
waiver of recovery of overpayments
under the Railroad Unemployment
Insurance Act (RUIA). Currently, the
regulations require all requests for
reconsideration of initial decisions to be
made in writing. The proposed rule
would allow railroad employers to use
updated technology, such as computers
and e-mail, to request reconsideration of
an initial decision. Specifically, the
Board proposes to amend section
320.10(a) to allow railroad employers to
file requests for reconsideration under
the RUIA via an electronic program that
has been approved by the agency.
In addition, the proposed rule would
amend section 320.10(c) to change the
incorrect references to ‘‘§ 310.12’’ to the
correct references of ‘‘§ 320.12’’ in the
last two sentences of this section.
Section 320.10(d) is proposed to be
amended to change the incorrect
reference to ‘‘§ 310.5’’ to the correct
reference of ‘‘§ 320.5’’ in the first
sentence of this section. This section
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42517
would also be amended to provide that
a railroad employer’s request for
reconsideration can be made in writing
or electronically.
Collection of Information Requirements
There is an information collection
impacted by the proposed rule:
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement
Board (Board) has submitted the
following proposal(s) for the collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
approval.
Summary of Proposal(s):
(1) Collection Title: RUIA Claims
Notification System.
(2) Form(s) Submitted: ID–4K, ID–4K
(Internet), ID–4E, ID–4E (Internet).
(3) OMB Number: 3220–0171.
(4) Expiration Date of Current OMB
Clearance: 9/30/2005.
(5) Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
(6) Respondents: Business or other
for-profit.
(7) Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 669.
(8) Total Annual Responses: 18,700.
(9) Total Annual Reporting Hours:
339.
(10) Collection Description: Section
5(b) of the RUIA requires that effective
January 1, 1990, ‘‘* * * when a claim
for benefits is filed with the Board, the
Board shall provide notice of such claim
to the claimant’s base-year employer or
employers and afford such employer or
employers an opportunity to submit
information relevant to the claim before
making an initial determination on the
claim. When the Board initially
determines to pay benefits to a claimant
under this Act, the Board shall provide
notice of such determination to the
claimant’s base-year employer or
employers.’’
The purpose of the RUIA Claims
Notification System is to provide to
every unemployment and sickness
claimant’s base-year employer or
current employer, notice of each claim
for benefits under the RUIA and to
provide an opportunity for employers to
convey information relevant to the
proper adjudication of the claim.
Railroad employers currently receive
notice of applications and claims by one
of two options. The first option, Form
ID–4K, is a computer generated form
letter notice of all unemployment
applications, unemployment claims and
sickness claims received from
employees of a railroad company on a
particular day. Forms Letters ID–4K are
mailed on a daily basis to officials
designated by railroad employers.
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 141 (Monday, July 25, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42515-42517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14574]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-NE-02-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland (Formerly
Rolls-Royce plc) Models Tay 650-15 and 651-54 Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for Rolls-Royce Deutschland (formerly Rolls-Royce plc)
(RRD) models Tay 650-15 and 651-54 turbofan engines. That AD currently
requires borescope inspection of the high pressure compressor (HPC)
stage 12 disc assembly to detect damage caused by HPC outlet guide vane
(OGV) retaining bolt failure, and replacement of unserviceable parts
with serviceable parts. That AD also requires as terminating action,
the incorporation of a new design retention arrangement for the HPC OGV
to prevent HPC OGV retaining bolt failure. This proposed AD would
require the same actions but extends the terminating action compliance
time for Tay 650-15 engines. This proposed AD would also include
references to later revisions of two of the applicable RRD service
bulletins (SBs). This proposed AD results from findings that the
terminating action compliance time for Tay 650-15 engines can be
extended. We are proposing this AD to prevent an uncontained failure of
the HPC stage 11/12 disc spacer, which could result in damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by September
23, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD:
By mail: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New
England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket
No. 2001-NE-02-AD, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-
5299.
By fax: (781) 238-7055.
By e-mail: 9-ane-adcomment@faa.gov.
You can get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31 Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom;
telephone 011-44-1332-242424; fax 011-44-1332-249936.
You may examine the AD docket, by appointment, at the FAA, New
England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 238-
7747; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``AD Docket No. 2001-NE-02-AD'' in the
subject line of your comments. If you want us to acknowledge receipt of
your mailed comments, send us a self-addressed, stamped postcard with
the docket number written on it; we will date-stamp your postcard and
mail it back to you. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. If a person contacts us verbally, and that contact relates to a
substantive part of this proposed AD, we will summarize the contact and
place the summary in the docket. We will consider all comments received
by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those
comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD Docket (including any comments and service
information), by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. See ADDRESSES for the
location.
Discussion
On January 18, 2002, the FAA issued AD 2002-01-29, Amendment 39-
12624 (67 FR 4652, January 31, 2002). That AD requires borescope
inspection of the HPC stage 12 disc assembly to detect damage caused by
HPC OGV retaining bolt failure, and replacement of unserviceable parts
with serviceable parts. That AD also requires as terminating action,
the incorporation of a new design retention arrangement for the HPC
OGV, to prevent HPC OGV retaining bolt failure.
Actions Since AD 2002-01-29 Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2002-01-29, the FAA and the Luftfhart Bundesamt
(LBA), which is the airworthiness authority for Germany, reassessed the
time period allowed for incorporation of the terminating action
compliance time for Tay 650-15 engines. Part of that reassessment takes
into consideration the major reduction in flying time of the Tay 650-15
airliner fleet, since September 11, 2001. The FAA and LBA concluded
that the terminating action compliance time for the Tay 650-15 engines
can be safely extended by 25 months.
Special Flight Permits Paragraph Removed
Paragraph (f) of the current AD, AD 2002-01-29, contains a
paragraph pertaining to special flight permits. Even though this
proposed AD does not contain a similar paragraph, we have made no
changes with regard to the use of special flight permits to operate the
airplane to a repair facility to do the work required by this AD. In
July 2002, we published a new part 39 that contains a general authority
regarding special flight permits and airworthiness directives; see
Docket No. FAA-2004-8460, Amendment 39-9474 (69 FR 47998, July 22,
2002). Thus, when we now supersede ADs we will not include a specific
paragraph on special flight permits unless we want to limit the use of
that general authority granted in section 39.23.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of RRD SB No.
TAY-72-1498, Revision 2, dated December 31, 2004. That SB describes
procedures for installing new design retaining and locking hardware for
the HPC OGV and outer seal housing assembly. The LBA classified this
service bulletin as mandatory and issued AD D-2004-365, dated January
31, 2005, in order to ensure the airworthiness of these RRD engines in
Germany.
[[Page 42516]]
Bilateral Agreement Information
This engine model is manufactured in Germany and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
Section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. In keeping with this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the LBA has kept the FAA informed of
the situation described above. We have examined the findings of the
LBA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action
is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which
would require:
Initial and repetitive borescope inspections of the stage
12 rotor disc assembly for damage due to failed HPC OGV retaining
bolts, and removal of engine from service if damage is observed on the
stage 12 rotor disc.
As terminating action to the repetitive inspections,
removal from service of existing HPT rotor inner seal support assembly,
HP compressor outlet guide vane (5-span), HP compressor outlet guide
vane (6-span), HP rotor thrust bearing housing assembly, and diffuser
case assembly.
The proposed AD would require that you do these actions using the
service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 400 Tay 650-15 and 651-54 turbofan engines of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet. We estimate that 105 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this
proposed AD. We also estimate that it would take about 3 work hours per
engine to perform the proposed borescope inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $65 per work hour. Required parts would cost
about $3,200 per engine. We estimate that one third of the engines will
have the parts replaced at time of engine overhaul. We also estimate
that one third of the engines will have the parts replaced during an
engine mid-life shop visit. We also estimate that one third of the
engines will have the parts replaced at an engine shop visit dedicated
for these parts replacements, at a cost of about $90,000 per engine.
Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the proposed AD
to U.S. operators to be $3,600,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this proposal and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket No. 2001-NE-02-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14
CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-12624 (67 FR
4652, January 31, 2002) and by adding a new airworthiness directive, to
read as follows:
Rolls-Royce Deutschland (formerly Rolls-Royce plc): Docket No. 2001-
NE-02-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by September
23, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2002-01-29, Amendment 39-12624.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland (formerly Rolls-
Royce plc) (RRD) models Tay 650-15 and 651-54 turbofan engines with
high pressure compressor (HPC) outlet guide vane (OGV) retaining
bolts part numbers (P/Ns) BLT3602, DU909, and DU818 installed. These
engines are installed on, but not limited to Boeing 727 and Fokker
F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from RRD relaxing the terminating action
compliance time for Tay 650-15 engines due to reassessment by RRD.
We are proposing this AD to prevent an uncontained failure of the
HPC stage 11/12 disc spacer, which could result in damage to the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Inspection
(f) Perform a borescope inspection of the rear side of the stage
12 rotor disc at or before accumulating 8,000 cycles-since-new on
the OGV retaining bolts, or within 30 days from the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later. Use paragraph 3.A.(1) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of RRD Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB)
Tay-72-1483, Revision 2, dated October 20, 2000, to do the
inspection. If damage is observed on the stage 12 rotor disc, remove
the engine from service.
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Thereafter, perform repetitive borescope inspections of the
rear side of the stage 12 rotor disc no earlier than 1,800 and no
later than 2,200 cycles-since-last-inspection, or no later than 18
months since-last-inspection,
[[Page 42517]]
whichever occurs first. Use paragraph 3.A.(1) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of RRD MSB Tay-72-1483, Revision 2, dated October 20,
2000, to do the inspections. If damage is observed on the stage 12
rotor disc, remove the engine from service.
OGV Retaining Bolt Replacement
(h) For engines that had OGV bolts replaced with new bolts P/Ns
BLT3602, DU909, and DU818 as specified in RRD SB Tay-72-1484, dated
November 15, 1999, or Revision 1, dated December 17, 1999, the
initial and repetitive inspection requirements, based on engine
cycles-since-bolt installation, are the same as specified in
paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD.
Terminating Action
(i) As terminating action for the inspections required by this
AD, do the following:
(1) Before November 1, 2007 for Tay 650-15 engines, and before
October 1, 2012 for Tay 651-54 engines, remove from service the
parts listed in the following Table 1:
Table 1.--Parts To Be Removed From Service
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part No. Part name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JR12314A............................... HPT Rotor Inner Seal Support
Assembly.
EU57842A............................... HP Compressor Outlet Guide Vane
5-Span.
EU57843A............................... HP Compressor Outlet Guide Vane
6-Span.
JR30962A............................... HP Rotor Thrust Bearing Housing
Assembly.
JR30568A............................... Diffuser Case Assembly.
KB7106................................. Tab Washer.
EU12042................................ Retaining Lock Plate.
DU818.................................. Hex Head Bolt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Information on removing these parts from service can be
found in RRD MSB Tay-72-1498, dated October 20, 2000, or RRD MSB
Tay-72-1498, Revision 1, dated December 1, 2000, or RRD SB Tay-72-
1498, Revision 2, dated December 31, 2004.
(j) After performing the actions specified in paragraph (i) of
this AD, the inspections specified in paragraphs (f) through (h) of
this AD are no longer required.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(l) Luftfhart Bundesamt airworthiness directive D-2004-365,
dated January 31, 2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 18, 2005.
Jay J. Pardee,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-14574 Filed 7-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P