Regulatory Pilot Projects (Project XL); Correction, 42062 [05-14398]

Download as PDF 42062 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 139 / Thursday, July 21, 2005 / Notices (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 74 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Construction and demolition waste landfill owners/operators and State Agencies. Estimated Number of Respondents: 183. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 13,581 hours. Estimated Total Annualized Capital, O&M Cost Burden: $938. VerDate jul<14>2003 19:42 Jul 20, 2005 Jkt 205001 Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the addresses listed above. Please refer to EPA ICR No. 1745.05 and OMB Control No. 2050–0154 in any correspondence. Dated: July 5, 2005. Matt Hale, Director, Office of Solid Waste. [FR Doc. 05–14404 Filed 7–20–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–7941–8] Regulatory Pilot Projects (Project XL); Correction Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice; correction. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a document in the Federal Register of June 8, 2005 concerning request for comments on Regulatory Pilot Projects. Within the document are several citations of an erroneous Agency form number. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Heimlich, (202) 566–2234. Correction In the Federal Register of June 8, 2005, in 70 FR Doc. 05–11383, on page 33472, in the third column, replace all citations of ‘‘EPA ICR No. 1755.06’’ with the following: EPA ICR No. 1755.07. Dated: June 14, 2005. Gerald J. Filbin, Director, Innovative Pilots Division, Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation. [FR Doc. 05–14398 Filed 7–20–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [Regional Docket Nos. V–2004–3, –4, IL226– 1, FRL–7942–2] Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petitions for Objection to State Operating Permits for Midwest Generation Romeoville and Joliet Stations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notice of final orders on petitions to object to two State operating permits. ACTION: SUMMARY: This document announces that the EPA Administrator has responded to two citizen petitions asking EPA to object to operating permits proposed by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to two facilities. Specifically, the Administrator has partially granted and partially denied each of the petitions submitted by the Chicago Legal Clinic on behalf of Citizens Against Ruining the Environment to object to the proposed operating permits for the Midwest Generation Romeoville and Joliet stations. Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (Act), Petitioner may seek judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit of those portions of the petitions which EPA denied. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the Act. ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final orders, the petitions, and other supporting information at the EPA Region 5 Office, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an appointment at least 24 hours before visiting day. Additionally, the final orders for the Midwest Generation Romeoville and Joliet stations are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/ region07/programs/artd/air/title5/ petitiondb/petitiondb2004.htm. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permitting Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division, EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, telephone (312) 886– 4447. The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to review, and object to as appropriate, operating permits proposed by State permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the expiration of the EPA review period to object to State operating permits if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the State, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the comment period or the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM 21JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 139 (Thursday, July 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 42062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7941-8]


Regulatory Pilot Projects (Project XL); Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a document in 
the Federal Register of June 8, 2005 concerning request for comments on 
Regulatory Pilot Projects. Within the document are several citations of 
an erroneous Agency form number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Heimlich, (202) 566-2234.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 8, 2005, in 70 FR Doc. 05-11383, on 
page 33472, in the third column, replace all citations of ``EPA ICR No. 
1755.06'' with the following:

EPA ICR No. 1755.07.

    Dated: June 14, 2005.
Gerald J. Filbin,
Director, Innovative Pilots Division, Office of Policy, Economics and 
Innovation.
[FR Doc. 05-14398 Filed 7-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.