In the Matter of J. L. Shepherd & Associates; San Fernando, CA; Confirmatory Order Rescinding Order (Effective Immediately), 42108-42110 [05-14358]
Download as PDF
42108
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 139 / Thursday, July 21, 2005 / Notices
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 354, Data Report
on Spouse’.
3. The form number if applicable:
NRC Form 354.
4. How often the collection is
required: On occasion.
5. Who will be required or asked to
report: NRC employees, contractors,
licensees, and applicants who marry
after completing NRC’s Personnel
Security forms, or marry after having
been granted an NRC access
authorization or employment clearance.
6. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 60.
7. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 60.
8. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: 12 hours (.20
hour per response).
9. An indication of whether Section
3507(d), Pub. L. 104–13 applies: N/A.
10. Abstract: Completion of the NRC
Form 354 is a mandatory requirement
for NRC employees, contractors,
licensees, and applicants who marry
after submission of the Personnel
Security Forms, or after receiving an
access authorization or employment
clearance to permit the NRC to assure
there is no increased risk to the common
defense and security.
A copy of the final supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by August 22, 2005. Comments
received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
given to comments received after this
date: John A. Asalone, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(3150–0026), NEOB–10202, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503.
Comments can also be e-mailed to
John_A._Asalone@omb.eop.gov or
submitted by telephone at (202) 395–
4650.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:42 Jul 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda
Jo. Shelton, 301–415–7233.
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 14th
day of July, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 05–14360 Filed 7–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 71–0122; Approval No. 0122;
EA–01–164]
In the Matter of J. L. Shepherd &
Associates; San Fernando, CA;
Confirmatory Order Rescinding Order
(Effective Immediately)
I
J. L. Shepherd & Associates (JLS&A)
was the holder of Quality Assurance
(QA) Program Approval for Radioactive
Material Packages No. 0122 (Approval
No. 0122), issued by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part
71, Subpart H. The approval was
originally issued January 17, 1980,
pursuant to the QA requirements of 10
CFR 71.101. QA activities included:
design, procurement, fabrication,
assembly, testing, modification,
maintenance, repair, and use of
transportation packages subject to the
provisions of 10 CFR Part 71. In
addition to an NRC-approved QA
program satisfying the provisions of 10
CFR Part 71, Subpart H, JLS&A was
required to comply with the
requirements in 10 CFR Part 71, Subpart
C, which grants a general license
authorizing licensed material for which
a Certificate of Compliance (CoC) had
been issued by the NRC to be
transported or delivered to a carrier for
transport. Based on JLS&A failure to
comply with these requirements, QA
Program Approval No. 0122 was
withdrawn, by the immediately effective
NRC Order, dated July 3, 2001 (July
2001 Order) (66 FR 36603, July 12,
2001).
II
The NRC issued the July 2001 Order
because the NRC lacked confidence that
JLS&A was implementing its NRCapproved QA Program (71–0122,
Revision No. 5) in full conformance
with the terms and conditions of an
NRC CoC and with 10 CFR Part 71,
Subpart H.
On several occasions subsequent to
imposition of the July 2001 Order,
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
JLS&A has requested, based on its
proposed Near-Term Corrective Action
Plan (NTCAP), interim relief from the
July 2001 Order to allow shipments in
U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) specification packaging
designated as 20WC. On August 17,
2001, in response to the July 2001
Order, JLS&A requested interim relief
pursuant to its proposed NTCAP to
allow 68 shipments to 16 customers,
subject to JLS&A’s commitment to take
certain actions regarding
implementation of its 10 CFR Part 71
QA Program. On September 19, 2001,
the NRC issued a Confirmatory Order
Relaxing the July 3, 2001, Order
(September 2001 Order) based on JLS&A
commitment to hold all shipments until
NRC completed an inspection which
confirmed JLS&A’s satisfactory
completion of the actions identified in
its August request. Subsequent to
certifications under oath and affirmation
from both the Independent Auditor and
J. L. Shepherd, the President of JLS&A,
that the conditions for issuance of an
Order had been met, the NRC conducted
an inspection at the JLS&A facility on
November 13–15, 2001. As a result of
the inspection findings, the inspection
team authorized JLS&A to commence
the shipments in accordance with the
September 2001 Order.
By letter dated December 7, 2001,
JLS&A requested that provisions of the
July 2001 Order be relaxed based on a
showing of good cause. Specifically,
JLS&A requested interim relief to ship
an irradiator to Surry Nuclear Power
Station and return the replaced unit to
JLS&A’s facility in California. JLS&A
proposed to use the NTCAP specified in
the September 2001 Order to authorize
these two shipments in DOT
specification packaging designated as
20WC. The NRC Staff reviewed JLS&A’s
relief request to determine whether the
requested relief would be consistent
with assurances that public health and
safety are maintained. As a result, the
NRC issued a Confirmatory Order
Relaxing Order dated December 13,
2002 (December 2002 Order), which
relaxed the July 2001 Order to grant
interim relief to allow two shipments to
one customer in 20WC packages in
accordance with JLS&A’s NTCAP,
provided certain commitments were
met.
By letters dated February 26, 2002, as
supplemented March 13, 18, and 25,
2002, JLS&A requested that provisions
of the July 2001 Order be relaxed based
on a showing of good cause.
Specifically, JLS&A requested an
extension of the September 2001 Order
expiration date from March 31, 2002 to
June 30, 2002, to authorize JLS&A to
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 139 / Thursday, July 21, 2005 / Notices
complete shipment of Type B quantities
of radioactive material in DOT 20WC
specification packaging that was
authorized by the September 2001
Order. The extension of the expiration
date was necessary since many of the
JLS&A customers did not obtain the
necessary licensing approval or building
modification in time for the shipments
to be completed by March 31, 2002. In
addition, JLS&A requested authorization
to make additional shipment to
customers not approved by the
September 2001 Order. JLS&A proposed
to use the NTCAP specified in the
September 2001 Order. JLS&A
committed to: (1) Inspect the 20WC
package (both shield and overpack); (2)
document the inspection in a separate
report; (3) perform the shipping and
inspection function only by trained
personnel; and (4) have the Independent
Auditor verify compliance of each
shipment with the foregoing
commitments and certify such
compliance in the routine monthly
reports to the NRC.
This Order only granted additional
time to complete the shipments
previously authorized by the September
2001 Order to be completed by March
31, 2002. On February 26, 2002, JLS&A
consented to issuance of a Confirmatory
Order (February 2002 Order) granting
interim relief from the July 2001 Order
subject to the commitments, as
described, agreed that the Confirmatory
Order would be effective upon issuance,
and agreed to waive its right to a hearing
on this action. Implementation of these
commitments, as described, provided
assurance that sufficient resources were
applied to the QA program, and that the
program would be conducted safely and
in accordance with NRC requirements.
In response to JLS&A’s most recent
request for interim relief, and based on
a showing of good cause, the NRC
issued a Confirmatory Order dated May
30, 2003, Confirmatory Order Relaxing
Order (May 2003 Order) (68 FR 34010,
June 6, 2003), that allowed JLS&A to
make shipments through June 1, 2005,
and expanded JLS&A’s shipment
authorization to transportation
packaging as authorized by JLS&A’s
implementation of Revision 7 of the
conditionally approved QA Program
Approval No. 0122. The May 2003
Order contained an expiration date of
June 1, 2005.
By letter dated April 7, 2005, JLS&A
requested the NRC to rescind the July
2001 Order that withdrew JLS&A’s
Quality Assurance Program Approval
No. 0122. Because the Staff’s review of
JLS&A’s request could not be completed
by June 1, 2005, the Staff issued a
Confirmatory Order on June 1, 2005,
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:42 Jul 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
which extended the expiration date of
the May 2003 Order to July 1, 2005 (70
FR 34165, June 13, 2005), to allow
JLS&A to continue limited operations
under Revision 7 of the conditionally
approved QA Program Approval No.
0122, while the Staff completed its
review.
III
The Staff has completed its review
and concluded that the July 2001 Order
should be rescinded. JLS&A has
completed all of the elements of its
NTCAP and has demonstrated, on
multiple occasions after relaxation of
the July 2001 Order, that it can safely
transport Type B radioactive shipments
in both DOT Specification 20WC
overpacks and NRC-approved CoC
packages under their new NRCapproved QA program. In addition, the
NRC Spent Fuel Project Office has
inspected JLS&A in 2003 and again in
2004 and although minor program
implementation deficiencies were
found, these findings were of lower
safety significance and none were of a
severity level comparable to the original
findings which precipitated the
issuance of the July 2001 Order. In
addition, in JLS&A’s April 7, 2005 letter,
JLS&A committed to the following
conditions:
1. JLS&A shall continue implementing
its new QA Procedures such that
reviews are conducted to ensure that all
activities under the scope of Part 71 are
governed by procedures defining the
activity, documenting the activity, and
providing audit trail of the activity
performed.
2. The Independent Auditor shall
continue to perform quarterly audits
verifying the implementation of the
conditionally approved JLS&A Quality
Assurance Program Plan and
Implementing Procedures. Reports shall
be provided quarterly by the 20th day of
the month following completion of the
audit. Any areas of nonconformance,
not self identified by JLS&A, shall be
reported to NRC.
3. JLS&A shall keep monthly statistics
regarding QA Program implementation
and procedure adherence. Such
statistics shall include the number of
nonconformances, the nature of the
nonconformances, and indicate those
nonconformances that are referred to the
corrective action processes. Such
information shall be provided to the
Independent Auditor who will report
any areas of concern to NRC during
scheduled reports.
4. JLS&A shall immediately stop work
or cause to be stopped any work which
would result in a potential hazard to
public health and safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42109
5. Conditions 1 though 4 shall remain
in effect for one year from date of
rescission of the July 3 Order, or until
the Independent Auditor shall issue
four successive quarterly reports that
show no violation of NRC regulations
and effective implementation of the
JLS&A Quality Assurance Program.
On June 23, 2005, JLS&A consented to
issuance of this Order with the
commitments, as described in Section
IV below. JLS&A further agreed in its
June 23, 2005, letter that this Order is
to be effective upon issuance and that it
waived its right to a hearing.
Implementation of these commitments
will provide enhanced assurance that
sufficient resources will be applied to
JLS&A’s Quality Assurance Program
Plan and Implementing Procedures, and
that the plan and procedures will be
conducted safely and in accordance
with NRC requirements. I find JLS&A’s
commitments as set forth in Section IV
acceptable and necessary and conclude
that with these commitments, the public
health and safety are reasonably
assured. In view of the foregoing, I have
determined that the public health and
safety require that JLS&A’s
commitments be by this Order. Based on
the above and JLS&A’s consent, this
Order is immediately effective upon
issuance.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 62,
81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the Commission’s regulations in 10
CFR Section 2.202 and 10 CFR parts 71
and 110, it is hereby ordered, effective
immediately, that the July 3, 2001,
Order is rescinded, reinstating JLS&A’s
quality assurance program approval and
granting relief to J. L. Shepherd and
Associates to allow full participation in
10 CFR part 71 transportation activities
in accordance with NRC-approved
quality assurance program approval,
revision 7, based on the following
conditions:
1. JLS&A shall continue implementing
its new QA Procedures. Reviews shall
be conducted to ensure that all activities
under the scope of 10 CFR part 71 are
governed by procedures defining the
activity, documenting the activity, and
providing an audit trail of the activity
performed.
2. The Independent Auditor shall
continue to perform quarterly audits
verifying the implementation of the
conditionally approved JLS&A Quality
Assurance Program Plan and
Implementing Procedures. Reports shall
be provided quarterly by the 20th day of
the month following completion of the
audit. Any areas of nonconformance
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
42110
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 139 / Thursday, July 21, 2005 / Notices
included in such reports that are not self
identified by JLS&A, shall also be
reported to NRC, in writing, by the 20th
day of the month following completion
of the audit.
3. JLS&A shall keep monthly statistics
regarding QA Program implementation
and procedure adherence. Such
statistics shall include the number of
nonconformances, the nature of the
nonconformances, and those
nonconformances referred to the
corrective action processes. Such
information shall be provided to the
Independent Auditor who will report
any areas of concern to NRC through
scheduled reports.
4. JLS&A shall immediately stop work
or cause to be stopped any work which
would result in a potential hazard to
public health and safety.
5. Conditions 1 though 4 shall remain
in effect for one year from date of
rescission of the July 3 Order, or until
the Independent Auditor shall issue
four successive quarterly reports that
show no violation of NRC regulations
and effective implementation of the
JLS&A Quality Assurance Program,
whichever is later.
The Director, Office of Enforcement,
may in writing, relax or rescind any of
the above conditions upon
demonstration by JLS&A of good cause.
V
or by e-mail to hearingdocket@nrc.gov
and also to the Office of the General
Counsel either by means of facsimile
transmission to 301–415–3725 or by
e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. If a
person other than the licensee requests
a hearing, that person shall set forth
with particularity the manner in which
his interest is adversely affected by this
Order and shall address the criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an Order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order should
be sustained.
In the absence of any request for
hearing, or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
Section IV above shall be final 20 days
from the date of this Order without
further order or proceedings. If an
extension of time for requesting a
hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in Section IV shall
be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received.
An answer or a request for hearing shall
not stay the immediate effectiveness of
this Order.
Dated this 30th day of June, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael R. Johnson,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–14358 Filed 7–20–05; 8:45 am]
Any person adversely affected by this
Confirmatory Order, other than the
Certificate Holder, may request a
hearing within 20 days of its issuance.
Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending
the time to request a hearing. A request
for extension of time must be made in
writing to the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555,
and include a statement of good cause
for the extension. Any request for a
hearing shall be submitted to the
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, ATTN: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC
20555. Copies also shall be sent to the
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, to the Assistant
General Counsel for Materials Litigation
and Enforcement at the same address, to
the Regional Administrator, NRC Region
IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400,
Arlington, TX 76011 and to JLS&A.
Because of continuing disruptions in
delivery of mail to United States
Government offices, it is requested that
answers and requests for hearing be
transmitted to the Secretary of the
Commission either by means of
facsimile transmission to 301–415–1101
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:42 Jul 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 55–61290; License No. SOP–
11768; IA–05–15]
In the Matter of Richard M. Probasco;
Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
I
Richard M. Probasco (Mr. Probasco) is
employed as a Shift Manager at the
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim).
Mr. Probasco is the holder of Senior
Reactor Operator (SRO) License Number
SOP–11768 issued by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant
to 10 CFR Part 55. The license
authorizes Mr. Probasco to direct the
licensed activities of licensed operators
at, and to manipulate all controls of, the
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, facility
license number DPR–35. The facility is
located on an Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. site in Plymouth, MA.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II
An investigation was initiated by the
NRC Office of Investigations (OI) on
August 27, 2004, at Pilgrim. This
investigation was initiated, in part, to
determine if Mr. Probasco did not take
appropriate corrective actions when he
became aware of the inattentiveness of
a Control Room Supervisor (CRS) on
June 29, 2004. Based on the evidence
developed during its investigation, OI
substantiated that, in careless disregard
for requirements, Mr. Probasco did not
immediately relieve the CRS from duty,
have him for-cause fitness-for-duty
tested, inform appropriate site
personnel, and initiate a Condition
Report (CR).
III
In response to a March 23, 2005 letter,
Mr. Probasco requested the use of
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to
resolve this matter with the NRC. ADR
is a process in which a neutral mediator
with no decision-making authority
assists the NRC and Mr. Probasco in
reaching an agreement on resolving any
differences regarding the enforcement
action. An ADR session was held
between Mr. Probasco and the NRC in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 17,
2005, and was mediated by a
professional mediator, arranged through
Cornell University’s Institute of Conflict
Management. During that ADR session,
a settlement agreement was reached.
The elements of the settlement
agreement consisted of the following:
1. Mr. Probasco agreed that he
violated an NRC requirement by not
properly documenting and informing
management of his observation that a
CRS was inattentive to duty in the
control room on June 29, 2004.
2. The NRC maintained that Mr.
Probasco’s actions in violating the
requirement was in careless disregard of
an NRC requirement. Mr. Probasco
contended that while he erred in
violating the requirement, his actions
were not willful, in careless disregard of
an NRC requirement. The NRC and Mr.
Probasco agreed to disagree on this
point.
3. Mr. Probasco, subsequent to the
identification of this violation, took
actions to assure that he learned from
this violation and provided the NRC
with assurance that it would not recur.
These actions included: (a) Sharing the
March 23, 2005 letter from the NRC
with his SRO peers at Pilgrim to
emphasize the significance of the
violation; (b) participating actively to
share his experience with all Entergy
plants via a corporate notification; and
(c) contributing to the preparation of an
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 139 (Thursday, July 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42108-42110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14358]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 71-0122; Approval No. 0122; EA-01-164]
In the Matter of J. L. Shepherd & Associates; San Fernando, CA;
Confirmatory Order Rescinding Order (Effective Immediately)
I
J. L. Shepherd & Associates (JLS&A) was the holder of Quality
Assurance (QA) Program Approval for Radioactive Material Packages No.
0122 (Approval No. 0122), issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part 71, Subpart H.
The approval was originally issued January 17, 1980, pursuant to the QA
requirements of 10 CFR 71.101. QA activities included: design,
procurement, fabrication, assembly, testing, modification, maintenance,
repair, and use of transportation packages subject to the provisions of
10 CFR Part 71. In addition to an NRC-approved QA program satisfying
the provisions of 10 CFR Part 71, Subpart H, JLS&A was required to
comply with the requirements in 10 CFR Part 71, Subpart C, which grants
a general license authorizing licensed material for which a Certificate
of Compliance (CoC) had been issued by the NRC to be transported or
delivered to a carrier for transport. Based on JLS&A failure to comply
with these requirements, QA Program Approval No. 0122 was withdrawn, by
the immediately effective NRC Order, dated July 3, 2001 (July 2001
Order) (66 FR 36603, July 12, 2001).
II
The NRC issued the July 2001 Order because the NRC lacked
confidence that JLS&A was implementing its NRC-approved QA Program (71-
0122, Revision No. 5) in full conformance with the terms and conditions
of an NRC CoC and with 10 CFR Part 71, Subpart H.
On several occasions subsequent to imposition of the July 2001
Order, JLS&A has requested, based on its proposed Near-Term Corrective
Action Plan (NTCAP), interim relief from the July 2001 Order to allow
shipments in U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) specification
packaging designated as 20WC. On August 17, 2001, in response to the
July 2001 Order, JLS&A requested interim relief pursuant to its
proposed NTCAP to allow 68 shipments to 16 customers, subject to
JLS&A's commitment to take certain actions regarding implementation of
its 10 CFR Part 71 QA Program. On September 19, 2001, the NRC issued a
Confirmatory Order Relaxing the July 3, 2001, Order (September 2001
Order) based on JLS&A commitment to hold all shipments until NRC
completed an inspection which confirmed JLS&A's satisfactory completion
of the actions identified in its August request. Subsequent to
certifications under oath and affirmation from both the Independent
Auditor and J. L. Shepherd, the President of JLS&A, that the conditions
for issuance of an Order had been met, the NRC conducted an inspection
at the JLS&A facility on November 13-15, 2001. As a result of the
inspection findings, the inspection team authorized JLS&A to commence
the shipments in accordance with the September 2001 Order.
By letter dated December 7, 2001, JLS&A requested that provisions
of the July 2001 Order be relaxed based on a showing of good cause.
Specifically, JLS&A requested interim relief to ship an irradiator to
Surry Nuclear Power Station and return the replaced unit to JLS&A's
facility in California. JLS&A proposed to use the NTCAP specified in
the September 2001 Order to authorize these two shipments in DOT
specification packaging designated as 20WC. The NRC Staff reviewed
JLS&A's relief request to determine whether the requested relief would
be consistent with assurances that public health and safety are
maintained. As a result, the NRC issued a Confirmatory Order Relaxing
Order dated December 13, 2002 (December 2002 Order), which relaxed the
July 2001 Order to grant interim relief to allow two shipments to one
customer in 20WC packages in accordance with JLS&A's NTCAP, provided
certain commitments were met.
By letters dated February 26, 2002, as supplemented March 13, 18,
and 25, 2002, JLS&A requested that provisions of the July 2001 Order be
relaxed based on a showing of good cause. Specifically, JLS&A requested
an extension of the September 2001 Order expiration date from March 31,
2002 to June 30, 2002, to authorize JLS&A to
[[Page 42109]]
complete shipment of Type B quantities of radioactive material in DOT
20WC specification packaging that was authorized by the September 2001
Order. The extension of the expiration date was necessary since many of
the JLS&A customers did not obtain the necessary licensing approval or
building modification in time for the shipments to be completed by
March 31, 2002. In addition, JLS&A requested authorization to make
additional shipment to customers not approved by the September 2001
Order. JLS&A proposed to use the NTCAP specified in the September 2001
Order. JLS&A committed to: (1) Inspect the 20WC package (both shield
and overpack); (2) document the inspection in a separate report; (3)
perform the shipping and inspection function only by trained personnel;
and (4) have the Independent Auditor verify compliance of each shipment
with the foregoing commitments and certify such compliance in the
routine monthly reports to the NRC.
This Order only granted additional time to complete the shipments
previously authorized by the September 2001 Order to be completed by
March 31, 2002. On February 26, 2002, JLS&A consented to issuance of a
Confirmatory Order (February 2002 Order) granting interim relief from
the July 2001 Order subject to the commitments, as described, agreed
that the Confirmatory Order would be effective upon issuance, and
agreed to waive its right to a hearing on this action. Implementation
of these commitments, as described, provided assurance that sufficient
resources were applied to the QA program, and that the program would be
conducted safely and in accordance with NRC requirements.
In response to JLS&A's most recent request for interim relief, and
based on a showing of good cause, the NRC issued a Confirmatory Order
dated May 30, 2003, Confirmatory Order Relaxing Order (May 2003 Order)
(68 FR 34010, June 6, 2003), that allowed JLS&A to make shipments
through June 1, 2005, and expanded JLS&A's shipment authorization to
transportation packaging as authorized by JLS&A's implementation of
Revision 7 of the conditionally approved QA Program Approval No. 0122.
The May 2003 Order contained an expiration date of June 1, 2005.
By letter dated April 7, 2005, JLS&A requested the NRC to rescind
the July 2001 Order that withdrew JLS&A's Quality Assurance Program
Approval No. 0122. Because the Staff's review of JLS&A's request could
not be completed by June 1, 2005, the Staff issued a Confirmatory Order
on June 1, 2005, which extended the expiration date of the May 2003
Order to July 1, 2005 (70 FR 34165, June 13, 2005), to allow JLS&A to
continue limited operations under Revision 7 of the conditionally
approved QA Program Approval No. 0122, while the Staff completed its
review.
III
The Staff has completed its review and concluded that the July 2001
Order should be rescinded. JLS&A has completed all of the elements of
its NTCAP and has demonstrated, on multiple occasions after relaxation
of the July 2001 Order, that it can safely transport Type B radioactive
shipments in both DOT Specification 20WC overpacks and NRC-approved CoC
packages under their new NRC-approved QA program. In addition, the NRC
Spent Fuel Project Office has inspected JLS&A in 2003 and again in 2004
and although minor program implementation deficiencies were found,
these findings were of lower safety significance and none were of a
severity level comparable to the original findings which precipitated
the issuance of the July 2001 Order. In addition, in JLS&A's April 7,
2005 letter, JLS&A committed to the following conditions:
1. JLS&A shall continue implementing its new QA Procedures such
that reviews are conducted to ensure that all activities under the
scope of Part 71 are governed by procedures defining the activity,
documenting the activity, and providing audit trail of the activity
performed.
2. The Independent Auditor shall continue to perform quarterly
audits verifying the implementation of the conditionally approved JLS&A
Quality Assurance Program Plan and Implementing Procedures. Reports
shall be provided quarterly by the 20th day of the month following
completion of the audit. Any areas of nonconformance, not self
identified by JLS&A, shall be reported to NRC.
3. JLS&A shall keep monthly statistics regarding QA Program
implementation and procedure adherence. Such statistics shall include
the number of nonconformances, the nature of the nonconformances, and
indicate those nonconformances that are referred to the corrective
action processes. Such information shall be provided to the Independent
Auditor who will report any areas of concern to NRC during scheduled
reports.
4. JLS&A shall immediately stop work or cause to be stopped any
work which would result in a potential hazard to public health and
safety.
5. Conditions 1 though 4 shall remain in effect for one year from
date of rescission of the July 3 Order, or until the Independent
Auditor shall issue four successive quarterly reports that show no
violation of NRC regulations and effective implementation of the JLS&A
Quality Assurance Program.
On June 23, 2005, JLS&A consented to issuance of this Order with
the commitments, as described in Section IV below. JLS&A further agreed
in its June 23, 2005, letter that this Order is to be effective upon
issuance and that it waived its right to a hearing. Implementation of
these commitments will provide enhanced assurance that sufficient
resources will be applied to JLS&A's Quality Assurance Program Plan and
Implementing Procedures, and that the plan and procedures will be
conducted safely and in accordance with NRC requirements. I find
JLS&A's commitments as set forth in Section IV acceptable and necessary
and conclude that with these commitments, the public health and safety
are reasonably assured. In view of the foregoing, I have determined
that the public health and safety require that JLS&A's commitments be
by this Order. Based on the above and JLS&A's consent, this Order is
immediately effective upon issuance.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 62, 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and
186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR Section 2.202 and 10 CFR parts 71 and 110, it is
hereby ordered, effective immediately, that the July 3, 2001, Order is
rescinded, reinstating JLS&A's quality assurance program approval and
granting relief to J. L. Shepherd and Associates to allow full
participation in 10 CFR part 71 transportation activities in accordance
with NRC-approved quality assurance program approval, revision 7, based
on the following conditions:
1. JLS&A shall continue implementing its new QA Procedures. Reviews
shall be conducted to ensure that all activities under the scope of 10
CFR part 71 are governed by procedures defining the activity,
documenting the activity, and providing an audit trail of the activity
performed.
2. The Independent Auditor shall continue to perform quarterly
audits verifying the implementation of the conditionally approved JLS&A
Quality Assurance Program Plan and Implementing Procedures. Reports
shall be provided quarterly by the 20th day of the month following
completion of the audit. Any areas of nonconformance
[[Page 42110]]
included in such reports that are not self identified by JLS&A, shall
also be reported to NRC, in writing, by the 20th day of the month
following completion of the audit.
3. JLS&A shall keep monthly statistics regarding QA Program
implementation and procedure adherence. Such statistics shall include
the number of nonconformances, the nature of the nonconformances, and
those nonconformances referred to the corrective action processes. Such
information shall be provided to the Independent Auditor who will
report any areas of concern to NRC through scheduled reports.
4. JLS&A shall immediately stop work or cause to be stopped any
work which would result in a potential hazard to public health and
safety.
5. Conditions 1 though 4 shall remain in effect for one year from
date of rescission of the July 3 Order, or until the Independent
Auditor shall issue four successive quarterly reports that show no
violation of NRC regulations and effective implementation of the JLS&A
Quality Assurance Program, whichever is later.
The Director, Office of Enforcement, may in writing, relax or
rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by JLS&A of good
cause.
V
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other
than the Certificate Holder, may request a hearing within 20 days of
its issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to
extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of
time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and include a
statement of good cause for the extension. Any request for a hearing
shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC
20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555,
to the Assistant General Counsel for Materials Litigation and
Enforcement at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC
Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, TX 76011 and to
JLS&A. Because of continuing disruptions in delivery of mail to United
States Government offices, it is requested that answers and requests
for hearing be transmitted to the Secretary of the Commission either by
means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-1101 or by e-mail to
hearingdocket@nrc.gov and also to the Office of the General Counsel
either by means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-3725 or by e-mail
to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. If a person other than the licensee requests
a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in
which his interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall
address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely
affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and
place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered
at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be
sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of
this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of
time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions
specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for
hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this Order.
Dated this 30th day of June, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael R. Johnson,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05-14358 Filed 7-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P