Request for Public Comments on a Proposed New Information Collection To Be Submitted to OMB for Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 42090 [05-14317]
Download as PDF
42090
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 139 / Thursday, July 21, 2005 / Notices
and elk. These include: Alternative 1—
No Action; Alternative 2—Minimal
Management of Habitat and
Populations; Support Migration;
Alternative 3—Restore Habitat, Support
Migration, and Phase Back
Supplemental Feeding; Alternative 4—
Restore Habitat, Improve Forage, and
Phase Back Supplemental Feeding;
Alternative 5—Restore Habitat, Improve
Forage and Continue Supplemental
Feeding; and Alternative 6—Restore
Habitat, Adaptively Manage
Populations, and Phase Out
Supplemental Feeding.
Alternative 4, the proposed action,
strives to balance the major issues and
stakeholder perspectives, identified
during prescoping and public scoping,
with the purposes, missions, and
management policies of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and the National
Park Service. Assuming that the
WGFD’s herd objective of 11,029 had
been met, and that higher numbers of
elk would use the winter range,
approximately 4,000–5,000 elk and up
to 500 bison would winter in the
National Elk Refuge, and 1,300–1,600
elk would summer in the Grand Teton
National Park. The elk hunt in the
National Elk Refuge, and the herd
reductions in the Grand Teton National
Park would continue. A bison hunt
would be instituted in the National Elk
Refuge. Supplemental feeding would
take place only in above-average winters
(estimated to occur in roughly 5 out of
10 years). The potential for disease
outbreaks would be somewhat reduced,
and WGFD personnel would be
permitted to use Strain 19 to vaccinate
elk.
After the review and comment period
for this draft Plan/EIS, all comments
will be analyzed and considered by the
lead agencies. A final Plan/EIS will be
prepared and published, and will
include the substantive comments
received and the lead agencies’
responses to those comments. Changes
made to the proposed action will also be
identified in the final Plan/EIS. A ROD
and final management plan will then be
published.
All comments received from
individuals on environmental impact
statements become part of the official
public record. Requests for such
comments will be handled in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act, the Privacy Act, the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6(f)),
and other policies and procedures of the
lead agencies and DOI.
Reviewers should provide their
comments during the review period of
the draft Plan/EIS. This enables the lead
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:42 Jul 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
agencies to analyze and respond to the
comments at one time and to use
information acquired in the preparation
of the final Plan/EIS, thus avoiding
undue delay in the decision making
process. Comments on the draft EIS
should be specific and should address
the adequacy of the plan, the impact
statement, and the merits of the
alternatives discussed (40 CFR 1503.3).
In the final Plan/EIS, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service will respond to all
substantive comments. Comments are
considered substantive if they:
• Question, with reasonable basis, the
accuracy of the information in the
document.
• Question, with reasonable basis, the
adequacy of the environmental analysis.
• Present reasonable alternatives
other than those presented in the EIS.
• Cause changes or revisions to the
Bison and Elk Management Plan.
• Provide new or additional
information relevant to the analysis.
Dated: July 13, 2005.
Ralph O. Morgenweck,
Regional Director, Region 6, Denver, CO.
[FR Doc. 05–14226 Filed 7–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Geological Survey
Request for Public Comments on a
Proposed New Information Collection
To Be Submitted to OMB for Review
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
A request for a new information
collection described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for approval under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Copies of the proposed collection may
be obtained by contacting the USGS
Clearance Officer at the phone number
listed below. Comments on the proposal
should be made within 60 days to the
Bureau Clearance Officer, U.S.
Geological Survey, 807 National Center,
Reston, VA 20192.
As required by OMB regulations at 5
CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the USGS solicits
specific public comments as to:
1. Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions on the
bureaus, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
2. The accuracy of the bureau’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
3. The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
information technology.
Title: Community Survey of
Rappahannock River Residents
OMB Approval No: New collection
Summary: This information collection
is in support of development of a
Comprehensive Conservation Plan for
Rappahannock National Wildlife
Refuge. Under the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, all national wildlife refuges are
required to develop a Comprehensive
Conservation Plan (CCP). A CCP is a
document that provides a framework for
guiding refuge management decisions.
This planning process ensures the
opportunity for active public
involvement in the preparation and
revision of comprehensive conservation
plans. This information collection will
inform the planning process by
providing information to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service on the attitudes
and opinions of local residents
regarding Rappahannock National
Wildlife Refuge and its management.
Estimated Completion Time: 20
minutes.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 1,000.
Frequency: One time.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 333
hours.
Affected Public: Residents adjacent to
the Rappahannock River Basin, Virginia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
obtain copies of the survey, contact the
Bureau clearance office, U.S. Geological
Survey, 807 National Center, 12201
Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia,
20192, telephone (703) 648–7313.
Dated: July 14, 2005.
Susan D. Haseltine,
Associate Director for Biology
[FR Doc. 05–14317 Filed 7–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–47–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CA–660–05–1220]
Notice of Extension of Emergency
Closure of Public Lands to
Recreational Shooting on Public Lands
Administered by the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Palm SpringsSouth Coast Field Office, CA
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 139 (Thursday, July 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 42090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-14317]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Geological Survey
Request for Public Comments on a Proposed New Information
Collection To Be Submitted to OMB for Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act
A request for a new information collection described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35). Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by contacting
the USGS Clearance Officer at the phone number listed below. Comments
on the proposal should be made within 60 days to the Bureau Clearance
Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 807 National Center, Reston, VA 20192.
As required by OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the USGS
solicits specific public comments as to:
1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions on the bureaus, including whether
the information will have practical utility;
2. The accuracy of the bureau's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used;
3. The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
Title: Community Survey of Rappahannock River Residents
OMB Approval No: New collection
Summary: This information collection is in support of development
of a Comprehensive Conservation Plan for Rappahannock National Wildlife
Refuge. Under the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, all national wildlife refuges are required to develop a
Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP). A CCP is a document that
provides a framework for guiding refuge management decisions. This
planning process ensures the opportunity for active public involvement
in the preparation and revision of comprehensive conservation plans.
This information collection will inform the planning process by
providing information to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the
attitudes and opinions of local residents regarding Rappahannock
National Wildlife Refuge and its management.
Estimated Completion Time: 20 minutes.
Estimated Annual Number of Respondents: 1,000.
Frequency: One time.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 333 hours.
Affected Public: Residents adjacent to the Rappahannock River
Basin, Virginia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To obtain copies of the survey,
contact the Bureau clearance office, U.S. Geological Survey, 807
National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia, 20192,
telephone (703) 648-7313.
Dated: July 14, 2005.
Susan D. Haseltine,
Associate Director for Biology
[FR Doc. 05-14317 Filed 7-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-47-M