Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year 2005 Funding Opportunity for 1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial Program Outreach Initiative, 40311-40318 [05-13752]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
In order to further publicize this
planning effort, a public announcement
was made to State and Federal agencies
by letter and to local landowners
through local newspapers to announce
the change in project purpose.
NRCS scheduled an interdisciplinary,
interagency team to work with the
Sponsor, landowners, and other
interested groups. The team was
compiled of specialists from F&WS,
EPD, CES, and DNR, along with local
operators. The team worked in the
watershed area and downstream to
Harris Reservoir, to gain insight to the
magnitude of the problems and possible
solutions. Several meetings, group
discussions, and interviews were held
with local planners, individuals,
government officials and other technical
experts. Evaluations and alternative
solutions were developed with the
Sponsor and other officials. The
Recommended Plan was agreed upon.
Another public meeting was on March
30, 2004. The results of surveys, studies,
field investigations and the Alternatives
Plans were presented to the public. The
Selected Plan was agreed upon by those
in attendance.
In early 2003, representatives of the
NRCS, F&WS, DNR, EPD, and CES made
a field inspection to determine the
quality and quantity of resources that
would be impacted by selected practices
and to consider possible mitigation
measures. It was the consensus of the
group that an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) was not needed for this
project. This agreement was based on
the type of practices and systems
planned and that each would be
installed on previously disturbed land.
With this consensus, an Environmental
Assessment (EA) was prepared
accordingly.
Upon review of the Big Cedar Creek
Watershed Plan-EA, this Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) was
prepared. These documents are being
distributed to all concerned agencies,
groups, and interested individuals. A
Notice of Availability of the FONSI is
being published in the Federal Register.
Agency consolations and public
participation to date has shown no
conflicts with the implementation of the
selected plan.
Conclusion
The Environmental Assessment
summarized above indicates that this
Federal action will not cause significant
adverse local, regional, or national
impacts on the environment. Therefore,
based on the above findings, I have
determined that an environmental
impact statement for the recommended
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Big Cedar Creek Revised Watershed
Plan is not required.
40311
will be taken until 30 days after the date
of this publication in the Federal
Register.
Dated: June 28, 2005.
James E. Tillman Sr.,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 05–13716 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am]
John Gleim,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 05–13717 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Caballo Arroyos Site 4 (Wardy˜
Hedgecock Dam), Dona Ana County,
NM
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year
2005 Funding Opportunity for 1890
Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative
Natural Resources
Conservation Service.
ACTION: Notice of a finding of no
significant impact.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969; the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR Part 1500); and the Natural
Resources Conservation Service Rules (7
CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, gives notice that an
environmental impact statement is not
being prepared for the rehabilitation of
Caballo Arroyos Site 4 (Wardy˜
Hedgecock Dam) in Dona Ana County,
New Mexico.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
˜
Rosendo Trevino III; State
Conservationist; Natural Resources
Conservation Service; 6200 Jefferson,
NE.; Albuquerque, NM 87109–3734;
telephone 505–761–4400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
environmental assessment (EA) of this
federally assisted action indicates that
the project will not cause significant
local, regional, or national effects on the
human environment. As a result of these
˜
findings, Rosendo Trevino III, State
Conservationist, has determined that the
preparation and review of an
environmental impact statement are not
needed for this project.
The project purpose is flood damage
reduction. The action includes the
rehabilitation of a floodwater retarding
dam. The Notice of a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FNSI) has been
forwarded to the Environmental
Protection Agency; various Federal,
state, and local agencies; and interested
parties. A limited number of copies of
the FNSI are available to fill single copy
requests at the above address. Basic data
developed during the EA are on file and
may be reviewed by contacting Rosendo
˜
Trevino III. No administrative action on
implementation of the proposed action
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Rural BusinessCooperative Service (RBS) announces
the availability of a yet undetermined
amount of funding in competitive
cooperative agreement funds allocated
from USDA Rural Development’s fiscal
year (FY) 2005 salaries and expense
budget. A separate notice will be
published when the funding level has
been determined. RBS hereby requests
proposals from 1890 Land Grant
Universities and Tuskegee University
(1890 Institutions) for competitively
awarded cooperative agreements for
projects that support USDA Rural
Development’s goals and objectives of
providing technical assistance for
business creation in economically
challenged rural communities, for
educational programs to develop and
improve upon the professional skills of
rural entrepreneurs, and for outreach
and promotion of USDA Rural
Development’s programs in small rural
communities with the greatest economic
need. Project proposals must be
designed to overcome currently
identified economic problems and lead
to sustainable economic development.
Project proposals that address both
traditional and nontraditional business
enterprises are encouraged. This
initiative seeks to create a working
partnership between USDA Rural
Development and the 1890 Institutions
through cooperative agreements. A
cooperative agreement requires
substantial involvement of the
government agency in carrying out the
objectives of the project.
Cooperative agreements will be
awarded to the project proposals
receiving the highest scores as
determined by a peer review panel of
USDA employees knowledgeable of the
subject matter. Awards will be made to
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
40312
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
the extent that funds are available;
however, USDA Rural Development is
making no commitment to fund any
particular project proposal or to make a
specific number of awards. Eligible
applicants must provide matching funds
equal to at least 25 percent of the total
project costs.
This Notice sets forth the information
required lists the information needed to
submit an application for these funds.
DATES: Applications must be submitted
by 4 p.m., eastern time on August 29,
2005. Proposals received after 4 p.m.
eastern time on August 29, 2005, will
not be considered for funding.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain application
guides and materials for the 1890 Land
Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial
Outreach and Development Initiative at
the following Internet Address: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/oa/1890.htm
or by contacting Mr. Edgar L. Lewis,
Program Manager, Rural BusinessCooperative Service, USDA, Mail Stop
3252, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3252.
Telephone: (202) 690–3407, E-mail:
edgar.lewis@usda.gov.
Final paper applications for an 1890
Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative cooperative agreement may be
submitted via the Postal Service to
Cooperative Programs, Attention: 1890
Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative Program, USDA, Mail Stop
3250, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, or UPS, Federal
Express, or similar delivery service to
Cooperative Programs, Attention: 1890
Land Grant Institutions’ Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative Program, USDA Room 4016,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. The phone
number that should be used for FedEX
or similar packages is (202) 720–7558.
Submit electronic cooperative
agreement applications using the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edgar L. Lewis, Program Manager, Rural
Business-Cooperative Service, USDA,
Stop 3252, Room 4221, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3252.
Telephone:(202) 690–3407, E-mail:
edgar.lewis@usda.gov, or visit the
program Web site at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/oa/1890.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural BusinessCooperative Service (RBS).
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Funding Opportunity Title: 1890 Land
Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial
Outreach and Development Initiative.
Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 10.856.
Key Dates: Cooperative agreement
applications must be received by 4 p.m.
eastern time, August 29, 2005. Proposals
received after 4 p.m., August 29, 2005,
will not be considered for funding.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
This solicitation is issued pursuant to
7 U.S.C. 2204b(b)(4) and Executive
Order 13256 (February 12, 2002),
‘‘President’s Board of Advisors on
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities.’’
Several other Federal statutes and
regulations apply to project proposals
considered for review and to
cooperative agreements awarded. These
include, but are not limited to:
7 CFR part 15, subpart A—
Nondiscrimination in Federally
Assisted Programs of the Department
of Agriculture—Effectuation of Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
7 CFR part 3015—Uniform Federal
Assistance Regulations.
7 CFR part 3017—Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement).
7 CFR part 3018—New Restrictions on
Lobbying.
7 CFR part 3019—Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit
Organizations.
7 CFR part 3021—Governmentwide
Requirements for Drug-Free
Workplace (Financial Assistance).
7 CFR part 3052—Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations.
RBS was established under the
authority of the Department of
Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994.
The mission of RBS is to enhance the
quality of life for rural Americans by
providing leadership in building
competitive businesses including
sustainable cooperatives that can
prosper in the global marketplace. RBS
meets these goals by investing financial
resources and providing technical
assistance to cooperatives and other
businesses located in rural communities
and establishing strategic alliances and
partnerships that leverage public,
private, and cooperative resources to
create jobs and stimulate rural economic
activity.
The primary purposes of the 1890
Land Grant Institutions Rural
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative are to encourage 1890
Institutions to provide technical
assistance for business creation in
economically challenged rural
communities, to conduct educational
programs that develop and improve
upon the professional skills of rural
entrepreneurs, and to provide outreach
and promote USDA Rural Development
programs in small rural communities
with the greatest economic need. Project
proposals must be designed to overcome
currently identified economic problems
and lead to sustainable economic
development. Project proposals that
address both traditional and
nontraditional business enterprises are
encouraged.
RBS will use cooperative agreements
with the 1890 Institutions to strengthen
the capacity of these communities to
undertake innovative, comprehensive,
citizen-led, long-term strategies for
community and economic development.
The cooperative agreements will be for
an outreach and development effort to
promote Rural Development programs
in targeted underserved rural
communities and shall include, but not
be limited to:
(a) Developing a business startup
program including technical assistance,
to assist new cooperatives and other
businesses with new business
development, business planning,
franchise startup and consulting,
business expansion studies, marketing
analysis, cash flow management, and
seminars and workshops for
cooperatives and small businesses;
(b) Developing management and
technical assistance plans that will:
(1) Assess cooperative and small
business alternatives to traditional
agricultural and other natural resource
based industries;
(2) Assist in the development of
business plans or loan packages,
marketing, or bookkeeping; and
(3) Assist and train cooperatives and
small businesses in customer relations,
product development, or business
planning and development.
(c) Assessing local community
weaknesses and strengths, feasible
alternatives to agricultural production,
and the necessary infrastructure to
expand or develop new or existing
businesses;
(d) Providing community leaders with
advice and recommendations regarding
best practices in community economic
development stimulus programs for
their communities;
(e) Conducting seminars to
disseminate information to stimulate
business and economic development in
selected rural communities; and
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
(f) Conducting outreach through use
of computer technology and
maintaining an internet web presence
which links community leaders and
residents to available economic
development information.
Funds may not be used to: (a) Pay
costs of preparing the application
package; (b) fund political activities; (c)
pay costs prior to the effective date of
the cooperative agreement; (d) provide
for revolving funds; (e) do construction;
(f) conduct any activities where there is
or may appear to be a conflict of
interest; or (g) purchase real estate.
II. Awards
Program awards will be made through
cooperative agreements between RBS
and the 1890s Institutions receiving the
highest scores on their project
proposals. The maximum amount of
Federal funds awarded for any one
proposal will be $100,000.
If an applicant is to receive an award
that is less than the amount requested,
the applicant will be required to modify
the application to conform to the
reduced amount before execution of the
cooperative agreement. RBS reserves the
right to reduce or de-obligate any award
if acceptable modifications are not
submitted by the awardee(s) within 10
working days from the date the
application is returned to the applicant.
Any modification must be within the
scope of the original application.
Throughout the project period, USDA
Rural Development’s continued
commitment to advance funds will be
conditioned upon evidence of
satisfactory progress by the recipient (as
documented in certified acceptable
quarterly progress and financial
reports), and the determination that
continued funding is in the best interest
of U.S. Government.
III. Eligibility Requirements
1. Applicant Eligibility
To be eligible for an award under this
program, an applicant must:
(a) Be an 1890 Institution which
includes: Alabama A&M University;
University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff;
Delaware State University; Florida A&M
University; Fort Valley State University;
Kentucky State University; Southern
University and A&M College; University
of Maryland-Eastern Shore; Alcorn State
University; Langston University; North
Carolina A&T State University; Lincoln
University (Missouri); South Carolina
State University; Tennessee State
University; Prairie View A&M
University; Virginia State University;
and West Virginia State University; and
Tuskegee University. RBS will accept
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
only one application per institution
under this program. In the event that
more than one application is submitted,
the 1890 Institution’s president will
determine the official application for
consideration;
(b) Demonstrate that the personnel
assigned to the project have the
expertise and experience necessary to
fulfill the tasks set forth in the project
proposal. Applicants should
demonstrate a previous record of
successful implementation of similar
projects;
(c) Demonstrate expertise in the use of
computer technologies to provide
technical assistance and access to
Internet web sites; and
(d) Submit a completed application as
set forth in Section IV.3.
An applicant may subcontract with
organizations not eligible to apply
provided such organizations are
necessary for the conduct of the project.
However, the subcontracted amount
may not exceed one-third of the total
Federal award.
2. Project Eligibility
To be eligible for an award under this
program, an applicant must:
(a) Demonstrate that the project
eligible beneficiaries are located in a
rural area as defined in 7 U.S.C.
1991(a)(13)(A) with a demonstrated
economic need. Eligible beneficiaries
must also be located in communities
that show significant community
support for the proposal;
(b) Provide matching funds equal to at
least 25 percent of the total project
costs; and
(c) Establish and maintain an internet
web presence linked to the USDA Rural
Development web site. This web site
should contain links to additional
economic development function that
will benefit residents and community
leaders.
3. Rural Area Definition
Rural underserved targeted counties/
communities must be an area other than
a city or town that has a population of
greater than 50,000 inhabitants and the
urbanized area contiguous and adjacent
to such a city or town, as defined by the
U.S. Bureau of Census using the latest
decennial census of the United States.
4. Matching Funds
Matching funds may be provided by
either the applicant or third party in the
form of either cash or in-kind
contributions and must be from nonFederal funds. Matching funds must be
spent in proportion to the spending of
funds received from the cooperative
agreement. Applicants must verify in
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40313
their applications that matching funds
are available for the time period of the
cooperative agreement.
IV. Application Process
1. Application Packages
If an institution plans to apply using
a paper application, application
packages, including the required forms
for this funding opportunity, may be
obtained from https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/oa/1890.htm.
If an institution does not have access to
the Internet, or if it is having difficulty
accessing the forms online, it may
contact the RBS at (202) 690–3407 or
FAX (202) 690–2723. The application
forms and instructions may also be
requested via e-mail by sending a
message with the contact person’s name,
mailing address, and phone number to
edgar.lewis@wdc.usda.gov. The
application forms and instructions will
be mailed as quickly as possible. When
calling or e-mailing RBS, please indicate
that you are requesting application
forms and instructions for FY 2005 1890
Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Outreach and
Development Initiative.
If an institution plans to apply
electronically, the forms must be
obtained from https://www.grants.gov.
2. Application Submission
Applications must be received in the
RBS National Office by 4 p.m. eastern
time on August 29, 2005. Proposals
received after 4 p.m. eastern time on
August 29, 2005, will not be considered
for funding. The applicant assumes the
risk of any delay in proposal delivery.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
submit completed applications
electronically or via overnight mail or
delivery service to ensure timely receipt
by RBS. Receipt of all applications will
be acknowledged by e-mail. Therefore,
applicants are strongly encouraged to
provide accurate e-mail addresses. If the
applicant does not receive an
acknowledgment within 7 work days of
the submission deadline, please contact
the program manager. If RBS receives
your application after the deadline due
to: (a) Carrier error, when the carrier
accepted the package with guarantee for
delivery by the closing date and time, or
(b) Significant weather delays or natural
disaster, you will be given the
opportunity to document these
problems. RBS will consider the
application as having been received by
the deadline if your documentation
meets these requirements and verifies
the delay was beyond your control.
Applications submitted via facsimile
will not be accepted.
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
40314
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
An institution may submit its
application in paper or in an electronic
format. If a paper application is
submitted, a signed original and two
copies of the completed application
must be submitted. The original and 2
copies must include all required forms,
certifications, assurances, project
proposal document, and appendices, be
signed by an authorized representative
of the institution, contain original
signatures, and be submitted unbound.
A paper application submitted via the
Postal Service must be addressed to
Cooperative Programs, Attention: 1890
Land Grant Institutions’ Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative Program, USDA, Mail Stop
3250, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. A paper
application submitted via UPS, Federal
Express, or similar delivery service must
be addressed to Cooperative Programs,
Attention: 1890 Land Grant Institutions’
Rural Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative Program, USDA Room 4016,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. The phone
number to be used for FedEX or similar
packages is (202) 720–7558.
If an application is submitted
electronically, the application must be
submitted at https://www.grants.gov.
Applicants are advised to visit the site
well in advance of the application
deadline if they plan to apply
electronically to insure that they have
obtained the proper authentication and
have sufficient computer resources to
complete the application.
All Federal grant applicants must
provide a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number when applying for Federal
grants and cooperative agreements. The
DUNS number is required whether an
applicant is submitting a paper
application or using the governmentwide electronic portal Grants.gov. A
DUNS number is required for every
application for a new award or renewal/
continuation of an award, including
applications or plans under formula,
entitlement and block grant programs,
submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your institution has
a DUNS number. An institution may
acquire a DUNS number at no cost by
calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS
number request line on 1–866–705–
5711 or on-line at https://www.dnd.com.
If an institution’s application does not
contain a DUNS number field, please
write the DUNS number at the top of the
first page of the application, and/or
include the DUNS number in the
application cover letter.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
3. Completed Application
To be eligible for funding, an
application must contain all of the
following elements. Any application
that is missing any element or contains
an incomplete element will not be
considered for funding.
(a) Completed forms.
(1) Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for
Federal Assistance.’’
(2) Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs,’’ including Sections A, B, C,
and D. The applicant must include both
federal and matching funds.
(3) Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—
Non-Construction Programs.’’
(4) Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters—Primary
Covered Transactions.’’
(5) Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements.’’
(b) Letters of support.
(c) Table of Contents: For ease of
locating information, each proposal
must contain a detailed Table of
Contents immediately following the
required forms. The Table of Contents
should include page numbers for each
component of the proposal. Pagination
should begin immediately following the
Table of Contents. Provide page
numbers in the Table of Contents where
each evaluation criterion is addressed.
(d) Project Executive Summary: A
summary of the Project Proposal, not to
exceed one page.
(e) Project Proposal: The application
must contain a narrative statement
describing the nature of the proposed
project. Each of the proposal evaluation
criteria referenced in this funding
announcement must be addressed,
specifically and individually in
narrative form. The proposal must
include at least the following:
(1) Project Title Page. The Title Page
must include the following: Title of the
project, names of principal
investigators, and applicant
organization.
(2) Introduction. A concisely worded
justification or rationale for the proposal
must be presented. Summarize the
social and economical statistical data
(income, population, employment rate,
poverty rate, education attainment, etc.),
for the project area that substantiates the
need for the initiative. Specify, whether
the target area includes an
Empowerment Zone/Enterprise
Community, Champion Community,
Federally-recognized Indian reservation
or other Federally declared economic
disaster area. An applicant should
address the ‘‘Economic Need of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Community’’ evaluation criterion in
Section VII.1.(c).
(3) Workplan. Discuss the approach
(strategy) to be used in carrying out the
proposed project outreach and
achieving the proposed objectives.
Address the ‘‘Statement of Work’’
evaluation criterion in Section VII.1.(e).
A description of any subcontracting
arrangements to be used in carrying out
the proposed project must be included.
The workplan also must include:
(i) Overview: Identify and discuss the
specific goals and objectives of the
proposed project and its impact on the
proposed beneficiaries;
(ii) Timeframes: Develop a tentative
timeline for completing the major tasks
outlined in the project proposal;
(iii) Milestones: Describe and quantify
the expected outcomes of the proposed
project, including the businesses
created, professionals trained, jobs
created or assisted, conferences and
seminars conducted, and number of
participants, loans packaged, etc.;
(iv) Recipient involvement: Identify
the person(s) responsible for performing
the project tasks; and
(v) USDA Rural Development
involvement: Identify USDA Rural
Development responsibilities for
assisting and monitoring project tasks;
(4) Estimated Budget. Provide a
detailed budget justification, showing
both federal and applicant’s matching
funds, including in-kind contributions.
Provide a budget to support the work
plan showing all sources and uses of
funds during the project period. Detail
and document both cash and in-kind by
sources. Note that only goods and
services for which no expenditure is
made can be considered in-kind. If the
applicant is paying for the goods and
services as part of the matching funds
contribution, the expenditure is
considered a cash match, and should be
verified as such.
(5) Certification of Matching Funds.
Certify that matching funds will be
available at the same time Federal funds
are anticipated to be spent and that
matching funds will be spent in advance
of Federal funding, such that for every
dollar of Federal funds advanced or
reimbursed, the applicant will have
spent no less in proportion to the
spending of Federal funds received from
the cooperative agreement prior to
submitting the request for
reimbursement or advance. Please note
that this certification is a separate
requirement from the verification of
Matching Funds requirement.
(6) Leveraging Funds. Discuss in
narrative form how the institution will
use other Federal, State, private, and
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
40315
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
other sources of funds and resources to
leverage the proposed project.
(7) Coordination and Management
Plan. Describe how the project will be
coordinated among the various
participants, the nature of the
collaborations and benefits to
participants, the communities, the
applicant, and Rural Development.
Describe your plans for the management
of the project to ensure its proper and
efficient administration. Describe the
scope of Rural Development’s
involvement in the project.
(8) Technology Outreach. The project
proposal must address the applicant’s
ability to deliver computer technology
to the targeted rural communities and
maintain computer Internet Web sites
linking community leaders and
residents to available economic
development information. Address the
‘‘Digital Technology Outreach’’
evaluation criterion in this Section
VII.1.(f).
(9) Key Personnel Support. Provide
the curriculum vitae for the key
personnel used to carry out the goals
and objectives of the proposal.
(10) Facilities or Equipment. Identify
where the project will be located
(housed) and what additional
equipment is needed or already
available to carry out the specific
objectives of the project.
(11) Previous Accomplishments.
Summarize the institution’s previous
outreach and development
accomplishments work funded by
USDA Rural Development or similar
outreach or development experiences.
This is especially important for first
time applicants. Address the ‘‘Previous
Accomplishments’’ evaluation criterion
in Section VII.1.(d).
(12) Local and USDA Rural
Development State Office Support.
Provide letters of support from the local
community such as businesses,
educational institutions, local
governments, community-based
organizations, etc. Letters of support
should demonstrate commitments for
tangible resources and or assistance.
Include any letter from the appropriate
USDA Rural Development State Office
evidencing its opportunity for input into
your proposal and its involvement.
Identify and discuss tangible support
contained in the letters.
(13) Additional information. Provide
any additional information that
demonstrates commitment for tangible
resources and or that supports your
proposal. Additionally you are
encouraged to provide any strategic plan
that has been developed to assist
cooperative and business development
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
or entrepreneurship for the targeted
communities.
V. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications
Executive Order 12372 does apply to
this program.
VI. Funding Restrictions
Based on Section 708 of Title 7
Consolidated Appropriations Act 2004,
(Pub. L. 108–199) ‘‘No funds
appropriated by this Act may be used to
pay negotiated indirect cost rates on
cooperative agreements or similar
arrangements between the United States
Department of Agriculture and
nonprofit institutions in excess of 10
percent of the total cost of the agreement
when the purpose of such cooperative
arrangement is to carry out programs of
mutual interest between the two
parties.’’ Other funding restrictions are
identified in Section III.
VII. Application Review
1. Criteria—Project proposals will be
evaluated using the following seven
criteria. Each criterion is given the
weight value shown with total points
equal to 100. The points assigned
provide an indication of the relative
importance of each section and will be
used by the reviewers in evaluating the
proposals. Points do not have to be
awarded for each criterion. After all
proposals have been evaluated, the
Administrator may award an additional
10 discretionary points to any proposal
to obtain the broadest geographic
distribution of the funds, ensure a broad
diversity of project proposals, or ensure
a broad diversity in the size of the
awards.
(a) Support of Local Community (Up
to 10 points)—This criterion evaluates
the support of local government,
educational, community, and business
groups. Higher points will be awarded
for proposals demonstrating broad
support from all components of the
communities served, particularly
cooperative groups. Broad support is
demonstrated by tangible contributions,
such as providing volunteers,
computers, or transportation or cosponsoring workshops and conferences.
Points will be awarded based on the
level of tangible contribution in
comparison to the size of the award.
Tangible support must be stated in
letters from supporting entities.
(b) Matching Funds/Leveraging (Up to
10 points)—This criterion evaluates the
extent to which the institution has the
capacity to support the project with
matching funds and leveraging
additional funds and resources from
State, private, public and non-profit
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sources to carry out this outreach and
development initiative.
A maximum of 10 points will be
awarded based upon the amount the
proposal exceeds the minimum 25
percent matching requirement.
Applicants will be required to provide
matching funds or equivalent in-kind in
support of this project. Evidence of
matching funds availability must be
provided. Funds or equivalent in-kind
must be available at the time at which
the cooperative agreement is entered.
Matching funds points will be awarded
as listed below.
>25 percent
match.
>35 percent
match.
>50 percent
match.
>75 percent
to 35 percent
2 points.
to 50 percent
5 points.
to 75 percent
7 points.
match ...................
10 points.
(c) Economic Need of Community (Up
to 15 points)—This criterion evaluates
the economic need of the targeted
communities.
Five points will automatically be
awarded to project proposals with at
least one of the beneficiary communities
located in a targeted community(s):
Empowerment Zones, Enterprise
Communities, Champion Communities,
Federally-recognized Indian
reservations, and other federally
declared economic depressed or disaster
areas. The application must state the
name(s) and location(s) of the
economically depressed community(s)
and the type(s) of targeted community
designation (i.e., Empowerment Zone).
Up to a maximum of 7 additional
points will be awarded for demonstrated
economic need based upon the
currently available poverty rate of the
targeted local community(s). An
applicant may use targeted county or
community poverty rates. When multicommunity proposals are submitted, the
over-all weighted average for all
counties or communities must be used.
An applicant must use current (2000
Census) poverty data for each targeted
county or community. Points will be
awarded based upon the differences in
the targeted county or community’s
average poverty from the respective
State poverty rate (average targeted
county or community poverty rate
minus the respective State poverty rate).
Percents will be rounded to the next
whole number.
Less than 3 percent ..............
3–6 percent ...........................
7–10 percent .........................
11–15 percent .......................
Greater than 15 percent .......
0
1
2
5
7
points.
point.
points.
points.
points.
Up to a maximum of 3 additional
points may be awarded based upon the
applicant’s ability to demonstrate or
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
40316
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
identify other economic needs of the
targeted communities, such as, but not
limited to, unemployment rates,
education levels, and job availability.
An applicant must provide sufficient
information for the panel to properly
evaluate and rate this criterion.
(d) Previous Accomplishments (Up to
10 points)—This criterion evaluates the
applicant’s previous accomplishments
with this initiative and/or its
demonstrative capacity to conduct
similar projects.
One point will be awarded to an
institution for each year it has been
awarded a cooperative agreement under
this program up to a total of 5 years. An
applicant must provide evidence of
satisfactorily completing the cooperative
agreement for each year for which credit
is claimed. Applicants with less than 5
recent years of awards in this program
may receive up to the maximum 5
points by highlighting the applicant’s
previous performance in each of the
past 5 years on projects with
cooperative and other business
development and outreach objectives.
The applicant should discuss the
potential impact of their project upon
the targeted underserved rural
communities, as well as describing
previous similar outreach and
development work.
Up to a maximum of 5 additional
points may be awarded based upon an
applicant’s ability to document the
positive impact of its project upon the
targeted underserved rural
communities. Positive entrepreneurial
developments should be emphasized.
Points will be awarded if an applicant
demonstrates that its technical
assistance resulted in the creation of a
business(s) in an economically
challenged community or that its
educational programs have developed or
improved upon the professional skills of
rural entrepreneurs. The applicant must
provide specific information as to the
specific businesses created and/or
professional educational programs
offered.
(e) Statement of Work (up to 45
points)—This criterion evaluates the
degree to which the proposed project
addresses the major purposes for the
‘‘1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative.’’ Points will be awarded
according to the degree to which the
statement of work reflects innovative
strategies for providing technical
assistance for business creation in
economically challenged rural
communities, for educational programs
to develop and improve upon the
professional skills of rural
entrepreneurs, and for outreach and
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
promotion of USDA Rural
Development’s.
Up to a maximum of 20 points will be
awarded to proposed projects that have
a clearly and concisely stated work plan
detailing goals and objectives,
timetables, expected results, and
measurable outcomes for providing
technical assistance for business
creation in economically challenged
rural communities. The greatest number
of points will be awarded to those
proposed projects that demonstrate
innovative and creative ways to
accomplish these goals.
Up to a maximum of 15 additional
points will be awarded to proposed
projects that have a clearly and
concisely stated work plan detailing
goals and objectives, timetables,
expected results, and measurable
outcomes for educational programs to
develop and improve upon the
professional skills of rural entrepreneurs
(i.e.; sustainable agricultural practices,
real estate sales, real estate appraising,
accounting for small entrepreneurs, etc.)
The greatest number of points will be
awarded to those proposed projects that
demonstrate innovative and creative
ways to accomplish these goals.
Up to a maximum of 10 additional
points will be awarded to proposed
projects for outreach and promotion of
USDA Rural Development’s programs in
small rural communities with the
greatest economic need. The greatest
number of points will be awarded to
those proposed projects that
demonstrate innovative and creative
ways to accomplish these goals.
All proposals must integrate
substantial USDA Rural Development
involvement.
(f) Digital Technology Outreach (Up to
5 points)—This criterion evaluates the
applicant’s experience and capacity to
provide outreach and assistance to
targeted underserved rural communities
through use of computer technologies.
A maximum of 5 points will be
awarded based upon the applicant’s
demonstrated capacity to promote
innovations and improvements in the
delivery of computer technology
benefits, including a web presence to
underserved rural communities whose
share in these benefits is
disproportionably low.
(g) Coordination and Management of
the Project (Up to 5 points)—This
criterion evaluates the applicant’s
demonstrated capacity to coordinate
and manage the proposed project among
the various stakeholders.
Up to a maximum of 5 points will be
awarded based upon the applicant’s
ability to demonstrate broad and
collaborative involvement with the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
applicant’s respective USDA Rural
Development State Office on the
proposed project. This involvement and
collaboration should include, but not be
limited to: (1) Evidence of any USDA
Rural Development State Office’s input
in and review of the applicant’s
proposal, (2) a detailed plan for the
State Office’s continued participation in
the proposed project that includes
specific participatory tasks, and (3) a
detailed plan as to how Rural
Development programs can be
integrated into the proposed project.
2. Selection Process
Each application will be evaluated in
a two-part process. First, each
application will be reviewed to ensure
that both the applicant and project meet
the eligibility requirements as set forth
in Section III. All applicants deemed to
be eligible will be scored based upon
the criteria set forth in Section VII.(1).
Each eligible application will be scored
by at least two expert reviewers. The
individual scores for each application
will be tallied and applications
receiving the highest scores will be
recommended to the Administrator,
RBS, for award. The RBS Administrator
has the final authority to award
discretionary points in accordance with
Section VII.(1) and determine the
applications to be funded. If a tie score
results after the proposals have been
rated and ranked, the tie will be
resolved by the proposal with the largest
matching funds as a percent of the
Federal amount of the award being
selected for award.
VIII. Award Administration
1. Award Notification
Upon completion of the review
process, successful applicants will be
notified, in writing, by the USDA Rural
Development National Office of its
award. Each successful applicant will
receive a cooperative agreement for
signature by the institution’s president
or designee. The document will become
binding upon execution by the
appropriate USDA official.
Unsuccessful applicants will be
notified, in writing, of the results of
review.
2. Advance of Funds Requirements
Requests for advance of funds must be
submitted to the National Office on a
quarterly basis on a completed Form
SF–270, ‘‘Request for Advance or
Reimbursement.’’ A completed Form
SF–269 (Long Form), ‘‘Financial Status
Report,’’ must be submitted with each
advance of funds request.
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
3. Project Reviews
USDA Rural Development State Office
representatives will conduct semiannual onsite reviews of award
recipients as well as any additional
reviews deemed necessary by the
National Office.
4. Reporting Requirements
During the term of the cooperative
agreement, each award recipient must
submit quarterly progress reports and a
final report detailing the tasks
performed and results accomplished to
the National and appropriate State
Office. Quarterly reports must be
submitted on or prior to January 31,
April 28, and July 28, and October 31,
2006. A final report must be submitted
within 90 days of the date of the
project’s completion. Reports may be
submitted in hard copy original or an
electronic copy that includes all
required signatures. Failure to submit
satisfactory, timely reports may result in
suspension or termination of award.
Upon the request of USDA Rural
Development, the award recipient will
submit manuscripts, videotapes,
software, or other media, as were
identified in project proposals. USDA
Rural Development retains those rights
delineated in 7 CFR 3019.36.
5. Administrative Requirements
Award Recipients are responsible for:
(a) Completing the objectives as
defined in the proposed workplan.
(b) Maintaining up-to-date project
records during the term of the
agreement.
(c) Maintaining an accounting of
Federal and matching fund
expenditures, including in-kind
contributions. Award recipients must
submit to the National Office a
completed Form SF–269 (Long Form)
with each advance of funds request and
within 90 days of the project’s
completion.
(d) Immediately refunding to USDA
Rural Development, at the end of the
agreement, any balance of unobligated
funds received from USDA Rural
Development.
(e) Providing matching funds or
equivalent in-kind in support of the
project, at least to the level agreed to in
the accepted proposal.
(g) Participating in the Annual or Biannual USDA Rural Development
Entrepreneurship and Information
Conferences/Workshops when planned.
(h) In cooperation with local
businesses, developing a program of
cooperative and business startup and
technical assistance that will assist with
new company development, business
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
planning, new enterprise, franchise
startup and consulting, business
expansion studies, marketing analysis,
cashflow management, and seminars
and workshops for cooperatives and
small businesses.
(i) Providing office space, equipment,
and supplies for all personnel assigned
to the project.
(j) Developing management and
technical assistance plans in
cooperation with USDA Rural
Development State Office that will:
(1) Assess cooperative and small
business alternatives to agriculture, and
other natural resources-based industries;
(2) Assist in the development of
business plans and loan packages,
marketing, bookkeeping assistance, and
organizational sustainability; and
(3) In cooperation with USDA Rural
Development State Office, provide
technical assistance and training in
customer relations, product
development, and business planning
and development.
(k) Assessing local community needs,
weaknesses and strengths, feasible
alternatives to agriculture production,
and the needed infrastructure to expand
or develop new or existing businesses.
The plans for any such studies must be
submitted to the USDA Rural
Development National office for
approval prior to the study being
conducted.
(l) In cooperation with the USDA
Rural Development State Office,
providing community leaders with
advice and recommendations regarding
best practices in community economic
development stimulus programs for
their communities.
(m) Developing digital technology
outreach and establishing and
maintaining an Internet web site,
linking community leaders and
residents to available economic
development information.
(n) Assuring and certifying that it is
in compliance with, and will comply in
the course of the agreement with, all
applicable laws, regulations, Executive
Orders, and other generally applicable
requirements, including those set out in
7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019.
(o) Using Federal funds only to pay
meeting-related travel expenses when
employees are performing a service of
direct benefit to the Government and in
direct furtherance of the objectives of
the proposed agreement. Federal funds
cannot be used to pay non-Federal
employees to attend meetings.
(p) Not commingling or using program
funds for administrative expenses to
operate an intermediary relending
program (IRP).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40317
(q) Submitting to USDA Rural
Development National Office, in
writing, any request for revising the
project work plan, budget, or requesting
a no-cost extension amending the
cooperative agreement.
(r) Assisting the USDA Rural
Development State Office in conducting
a semi-annual on-site review of the
recipient’s project.
(s) Collaborating, as needed, with the
USDA Rural Development National and
State Offices in performing the tasks in
the agreement and providing the Rural
Development National Office with the
information necessary for Rural
Development to fulfill its
responsibilities in the agreement.
USDA Rural Development is
responsible for:
(1) Monitoring the program as it is
being implemented and operated,
including monitoring of financial
information to ensure that there is no
commingling or use of program funds
for administrative expenses to operate
an IRP or other unapproved items.
(2) Terminating activity, after written
notice, if tasks are not met.
(3) Reviewing and approving changes
to key personnel.
(4) Providing technical assistance as
needed.
(5) Approving the final plans for any
community business workshops;
cooperative, business, and economic
development sessions; and training
workshops to be conducted by the
recipient.
(6) Providing reference assistance, as
needed, to the recipient for technical
assistance given on a one-on-one basis
to entrepreneurs and startup businesses.
(7) Reviewing and commenting on
strategic plans developed by recipients
for targeted areas.
(8) Reviewing economic assessments
made by the recipient for targeted
counties enabling USDA Rural
Development to determine the extent to
which its programs are beneficial.
(9) Carefully screening projects to
prevent First Amendment violations.
(10) Monitoring the program to ensure
that a web site link to USDA-Rural
Development is established and
maintained.
(11) State Offices conducting semiannual on-site reviews and submitting
written reports to the National Office.
(12) Participating in 1890 outreach
and development program workshops,
seminars and conferences as needed.
(13) Providing any other work agreed
to by USDA Rural Development in the
Cooperative Agreement.
IX. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact: Mr.
Edgar L. Lewis, Program Manager, Rural
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
40318
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Notices
Business-Cooperative Service, USDA,
Stop 3252, Room 4221, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3252.
Telephone: (202) 690–3407, e-mail:
edgar.lewis@wdc.usda.gov.
X. Paperwork Reduction Act
The paperwork burden associated
with this initiative has been cleared by
the Office of Management and Budget
under OMB Control Number 0570–0041.
Dated: July 7, 2005.
David Rouzer,
Acting Administrator, Rural BusinessCooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 05–13752 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–485–806
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Certain Hot- Rolled Carbon
Steel Flat Products from Romania
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
is extending the time limit for
completion of the preliminary results of
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
Romania until November 30, 2005. The
period of review is November 1, 2003,
through October 31, 2004.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 13, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dunyako Ahmadu or Dave Dirstine,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0198
and (202) 482–4033, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 27, 2004, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation of the 2003–2004 antidumping
duty administrative review of this order
covering S.C. Ispat Sidex S.A, Sidex
Trading S.r.l., and Metalexportimport,
S.A. See Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 69 FR 77181
(December 27, 2004).
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), provides at section
751(a)(3)(A) that the Department will
issue the preliminary results of an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act provides further that, if
the Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, the Department
may extend the 245-day period to 365
days.
The Department has determined that
it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary results by the current
deadline of August 2, 2005, because it
received a request for an expedited
changed–circumstances review for this
order on March 24, 2005, followed by a
request to conduct a sales–below-cost
investigation on March 31, 2005.
Following our initiation of a cost
investigation, we requested that Ispat
Sidex respond to a cost–of-production
questionnaire and respond to
supplemental questions regarding its
home–market and U.S. questionnaire
response.
This review presents new and
complex issues for the Department to
consider as a result of Romania’s change
in status from a non–market economy to
a market economy on January 1, 2003
(see Certain Small Diameter Carbon and
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and
Pressure Pipe From Romania: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 68 FR 12672
(March 17, 2003). Further, additional
time is necessary to conduct a
verification of Ispat Sidex’s
questionnaire responses.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2), the Department is
extending the time limit for the
preliminary results by 120 days to
November 30, 2005.
We are issuing this notice in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Dated: July 7, 2005.
Susan Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–3714 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–533–808
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and
Determination to Revoke Order in Part
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 7, 2005, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from
India. The review covers three
companies for the period December 1,
2002, through November 30, 2003. We
gave interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results.
Based on our analysis of the comments
received, we have made changes,
including correction of a clerical error,
in the margin calculations. The final
weighted–average margins are listed
below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’
section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 13, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Case at (202) 482–3174 or Minoo
Hatten at (202) 482–1690, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On January 7, 2005, we published the
preliminary results of review, extended
the time limit for these final results, and
invited parties to comment. Stainless
Steel Wire Rods From India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, Intent To
Revoke Order In Part, and Extension of
Time Limit for the Final Results of
Review, 70 FR 1413 (January 7, 2005)
(Preliminary Results). We received case
briefs from the petitioner,1 Chandan
Steel, Ltd. (Chandan), and Viraj Alloys,
Ltd., and VSL Wires, Ltd. (collectively
Viraj). We received rebuttal briefs from
Chandan, Viraj, and Isibars.2
1 The
petitioner is Carpenter Technology Corp.
is comprised of the following entities:
Isibars Limited, Zenstar Impex, and Shaktiman
Steel Casting Pvt. Ltd.
The Department determined that several case and
rebuttal briefs contained new factual information.
In a separate memorandum, the Department
outlined its rationale for either accepting or
rejecting such information. See Memorandum to
Laurie Parkhill entitled Submissions of Untimely
New Factual Information in the Administrative
2 Isibars
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40311-40318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13752]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year 2005 Funding Opportunity for
1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) announces the
availability of a yet undetermined amount of funding in competitive
cooperative agreement funds allocated from USDA Rural Development's
fiscal year (FY) 2005 salaries and expense budget. A separate notice
will be published when the funding level has been determined. RBS
hereby requests proposals from 1890 Land Grant Universities and
Tuskegee University (1890 Institutions) for competitively awarded
cooperative agreements for projects that support USDA Rural
Development's goals and objectives of providing technical assistance
for business creation in economically challenged rural communities, for
educational programs to develop and improve upon the professional
skills of rural entrepreneurs, and for outreach and promotion of USDA
Rural Development's programs in small rural communities with the
greatest economic need. Project proposals must be designed to overcome
currently identified economic problems and lead to sustainable economic
development. Project proposals that address both traditional and
nontraditional business enterprises are encouraged. This initiative
seeks to create a working partnership between USDA Rural Development
and the 1890 Institutions through cooperative agreements. A cooperative
agreement requires substantial involvement of the government agency in
carrying out the objectives of the project.
Cooperative agreements will be awarded to the project proposals
receiving the highest scores as determined by a peer review panel of
USDA employees knowledgeable of the subject matter. Awards will be made
to
[[Page 40312]]
the extent that funds are available; however, USDA Rural Development is
making no commitment to fund any particular project proposal or to make
a specific number of awards. Eligible applicants must provide matching
funds equal to at least 25 percent of the total project costs.
This Notice sets forth the information required lists the
information needed to submit an application for these funds.
DATES: Applications must be submitted by 4 p.m., eastern time on August
29, 2005. Proposals received after 4 p.m. eastern time on August 29,
2005, will not be considered for funding.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain application guides and materials for the 1890
Land Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial Outreach and Development
Initiative at the following Internet Address: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/oa/1890.htm or by contacting Mr. Edgar L.
Lewis, Program Manager, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA, Mail
Stop 3252, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-3252.
Telephone: (202) 690-3407, E-mail: edgar.lewis@usda.gov.
Final paper applications for an 1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach Initiative cooperative agreement may
be submitted via the Postal Service to Cooperative Programs, Attention:
1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial Program Outreach
Initiative Program, USDA, Mail Stop 3250, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, or UPS, Federal Express, or similar delivery
service to Cooperative Programs, Attention: 1890 Land Grant
Institutions' Rural Entrepreneurial Program Outreach Initiative
Program, USDA Room 4016, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC
20250. The phone number that should be used for FedEX or similar
packages is (202) 720-7558.
Submit electronic cooperative agreement applications using the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edgar L. Lewis, Program Manager,
Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA, Stop 3252, Room 4221, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-3252. Telephone:(202)
690-3407, E-mail: edgar.lewis@usda.gov, or visit the program Web site
at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/oa/1890.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS).
Funding Opportunity Title: 1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Outreach and Development Initiative.
Announcement Type: Initial Announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 10.856.
Key Dates: Cooperative agreement applications must be received by 4
p.m. eastern time, August 29, 2005. Proposals received after 4 p.m.,
August 29, 2005, will not be considered for funding.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
This solicitation is issued pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2204b(b)(4) and
Executive Order 13256 (February 12, 2002), ``President's Board of
Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities.''
Several other Federal statutes and regulations apply to project
proposals considered for review and to cooperative agreements awarded.
These include, but are not limited to:
7 CFR part 15, subpart A--Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted
Programs of the Department of Agriculture--Effectuation of Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
7 CFR part 3015--Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations.
7 CFR part 3017--Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement).
7 CFR part 3018--New Restrictions on Lobbying.
7 CFR part 3019--Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Non-Profit Organizations.
7 CFR part 3021--Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Financial Assistance).
7 CFR part 3052--Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations.
RBS was established under the authority of the Department of
Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994. The mission of RBS is to
enhance the quality of life for rural Americans by providing leadership
in building competitive businesses including sustainable cooperatives
that can prosper in the global marketplace. RBS meets these goals by
investing financial resources and providing technical assistance to
cooperatives and other businesses located in rural communities and
establishing strategic alliances and partnerships that leverage public,
private, and cooperative resources to create jobs and stimulate rural
economic activity.
The primary purposes of the 1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural
Entrepreneurial Program Outreach Initiative are to encourage 1890
Institutions to provide technical assistance for business creation in
economically challenged rural communities, to conduct educational
programs that develop and improve upon the professional skills of rural
entrepreneurs, and to provide outreach and promote USDA Rural
Development programs in small rural communities with the greatest
economic need. Project proposals must be designed to overcome currently
identified economic problems and lead to sustainable economic
development. Project proposals that address both traditional and
nontraditional business enterprises are encouraged.
RBS will use cooperative agreements with the 1890 Institutions to
strengthen the capacity of these communities to undertake innovative,
comprehensive, citizen-led, long-term strategies for community and
economic development. The cooperative agreements will be for an
outreach and development effort to promote Rural Development programs
in targeted underserved rural communities and shall include, but not be
limited to:
(a) Developing a business startup program including technical
assistance, to assist new cooperatives and other businesses with new
business development, business planning, franchise startup and
consulting, business expansion studies, marketing analysis, cash flow
management, and seminars and workshops for cooperatives and small
businesses;
(b) Developing management and technical assistance plans that will:
(1) Assess cooperative and small business alternatives to
traditional agricultural and other natural resource based industries;
(2) Assist in the development of business plans or loan packages,
marketing, or bookkeeping; and
(3) Assist and train cooperatives and small businesses in customer
relations, product development, or business planning and development.
(c) Assessing local community weaknesses and strengths, feasible
alternatives to agricultural production, and the necessary
infrastructure to expand or develop new or existing businesses;
(d) Providing community leaders with advice and recommendations
regarding best practices in community economic development stimulus
programs for their communities;
(e) Conducting seminars to disseminate information to stimulate
business and economic development in selected rural communities; and
[[Page 40313]]
(f) Conducting outreach through use of computer technology and
maintaining an internet web presence which links community leaders and
residents to available economic development information.
Funds may not be used to: (a) Pay costs of preparing the
application package; (b) fund political activities; (c) pay costs prior
to the effective date of the cooperative agreement; (d) provide for
revolving funds; (e) do construction; (f) conduct any activities where
there is or may appear to be a conflict of interest; or (g) purchase
real estate.
II. Awards
Program awards will be made through cooperative agreements between
RBS and the 1890s Institutions receiving the highest scores on their
project proposals. The maximum amount of Federal funds awarded for any
one proposal will be $100,000.
If an applicant is to receive an award that is less than the amount
requested, the applicant will be required to modify the application to
conform to the reduced amount before execution of the cooperative
agreement. RBS reserves the right to reduce or de-obligate any award if
acceptable modifications are not submitted by the awardee(s) within 10
working days from the date the application is returned to the
applicant. Any modification must be within the scope of the original
application.
Throughout the project period, USDA Rural Development's continued
commitment to advance funds will be conditioned upon evidence of
satisfactory progress by the recipient (as documented in certified
acceptable quarterly progress and financial reports), and the
determination that continued funding is in the best interest of U.S.
Government.
III. Eligibility Requirements
1. Applicant Eligibility
To be eligible for an award under this program, an applicant must:
(a) Be an 1890 Institution which includes: Alabama A&M University;
University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff; Delaware State University; Florida
A&M University; Fort Valley State University; Kentucky State
University; Southern University and A&M College; University of
Maryland-Eastern Shore; Alcorn State University; Langston University;
North Carolina A&T State University; Lincoln University (Missouri);
South Carolina State University; Tennessee State University; Prairie
View A&M University; Virginia State University; and West Virginia State
University; and Tuskegee University. RBS will accept only one
application per institution under this program. In the event that more
than one application is submitted, the 1890 Institution's president
will determine the official application for consideration;
(b) Demonstrate that the personnel assigned to the project have the
expertise and experience necessary to fulfill the tasks set forth in
the project proposal. Applicants should demonstrate a previous record
of successful implementation of similar projects;
(c) Demonstrate expertise in the use of computer technologies to
provide technical assistance and access to Internet web sites; and
(d) Submit a completed application as set forth in Section IV.3.
An applicant may subcontract with organizations not eligible to
apply provided such organizations are necessary for the conduct of the
project. However, the subcontracted amount may not exceed one-third of
the total Federal award.
2. Project Eligibility
To be eligible for an award under this program, an applicant must:
(a) Demonstrate that the project eligible beneficiaries are located
in a rural area as defined in 7 U.S.C. 1991(a)(13)(A) with a
demonstrated economic need. Eligible beneficiaries must also be located
in communities that show significant community support for the
proposal;
(b) Provide matching funds equal to at least 25 percent of the
total project costs; and
(c) Establish and maintain an internet web presence linked to the
USDA Rural Development web site. This web site should contain links to
additional economic development function that will benefit residents
and community leaders.
3. Rural Area Definition
Rural underserved targeted counties/communities must be an area
other than a city or town that has a population of greater than 50,000
inhabitants and the urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to such a
city or town, as defined by the U.S. Bureau of Census using the latest
decennial census of the United States.
4. Matching Funds
Matching funds may be provided by either the applicant or third
party in the form of either cash or in-kind contributions and must be
from non-Federal funds. Matching funds must be spent in proportion to
the spending of funds received from the cooperative agreement.
Applicants must verify in their applications that matching funds are
available for the time period of the cooperative agreement.
IV. Application Process
1. Application Packages
If an institution plans to apply using a paper application,
application packages, including the required forms for this funding
opportunity, may be obtained from https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/oa/
1890.htm. If an institution does not have access to the Internet, or if
it is having difficulty accessing the forms online, it may contact the
RBS at (202) 690-3407 or FAX (202) 690-2723. The application forms and
instructions may also be requested via e-mail by sending a message with
the contact person's name, mailing address, and phone number to
edgar.lewis@wdc.usda.gov. The application forms and instructions will
be mailed as quickly as possible. When calling or e-mailing RBS, please
indicate that you are requesting application forms and instructions for
FY 2005 1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial Outreach and
Development Initiative.
If an institution plans to apply electronically, the forms must be
obtained from https://www.grants.gov.
2. Application Submission
Applications must be received in the RBS National Office by 4 p.m.
eastern time on August 29, 2005. Proposals received after 4 p.m.
eastern time on August 29, 2005, will not be considered for funding.
The applicant assumes the risk of any delay in proposal delivery.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to submit completed applications
electronically or via overnight mail or delivery service to ensure
timely receipt by RBS. Receipt of all applications will be acknowledged
by e-mail. Therefore, applicants are strongly encouraged to provide
accurate e-mail addresses. If the applicant does not receive an
acknowledgment within 7 work days of the submission deadline, please
contact the program manager. If RBS receives your application after the
deadline due to: (a) Carrier error, when the carrier accepted the
package with guarantee for delivery by the closing date and time, or
(b) Significant weather delays or natural disaster, you will be given
the opportunity to document these problems. RBS will consider the
application as having been received by the deadline if your
documentation meets these requirements and verifies the delay was
beyond your control. Applications submitted via facsimile will not be
accepted.
[[Page 40314]]
An institution may submit its application in paper or in an
electronic format. If a paper application is submitted, a signed
original and two copies of the completed application must be submitted.
The original and 2 copies must include all required forms,
certifications, assurances, project proposal document, and appendices,
be signed by an authorized representative of the institution, contain
original signatures, and be submitted unbound.
A paper application submitted via the Postal Service must be
addressed to Cooperative Programs, Attention: 1890 Land Grant
Institutions' Rural Entrepreneurial Program Outreach Initiative
Program, USDA, Mail Stop 3250, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250. A paper application submitted via UPS, Federal Express, or
similar delivery service must be addressed to Cooperative Programs,
Attention: 1890 Land Grant Institutions' Rural Entrepreneurial Program
Outreach Initiative Program, USDA Room 4016, 1400 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20250. The phone number to be used for FedEX or
similar packages is (202) 720-7558.
If an application is submitted electronically, the application must
be submitted at https://www.grants.gov. Applicants are advised to visit
the site well in advance of the application deadline if they plan to
apply electronically to insure that they have obtained the proper
authentication and have sufficient computer resources to complete the
application.
All Federal grant applicants must provide a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number when applying for Federal
grants and cooperative agreements. The DUNS number is required whether
an applicant is submitting a paper application or using the government-
wide electronic portal Grants.gov. A DUNS number is required for every
application for a new award or renewal/continuation of an award,
including applications or plans under formula, entitlement and block
grant programs, submitted on or after October 1, 2003. Please ensure
that your institution has a DUNS number. An institution may acquire a
DUNS number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS number
request line on 1-866-705-5711 or on-line at https://www.dnd.com.
If an institution's application does not contain a DUNS number
field, please write the DUNS number at the top of the first page of the
application, and/or include the DUNS number in the application cover
letter.
3. Completed Application
To be eligible for funding, an application must contain all of the
following elements. Any application that is missing any element or
contains an incomplete element will not be considered for funding.
(a) Completed forms.
(1) Form SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance.''
(2) Form SF-424A, ``Budget Information--Non-Construction
Programs,'' including Sections A, B, C, and D. The applicant must
include both federal and matching funds.
(3) Form SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs.''
(4) Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
and Other Responsibility Matters--Primary Covered Transactions.''
(5) Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements.''
(b) Letters of support.
(c) Table of Contents: For ease of locating information, each
proposal must contain a detailed Table of Contents immediately
following the required forms. The Table of Contents should include page
numbers for each component of the proposal. Pagination should begin
immediately following the Table of Contents. Provide page numbers in
the Table of Contents where each evaluation criterion is addressed.
(d) Project Executive Summary: A summary of the Project Proposal,
not to exceed one page.
(e) Project Proposal: The application must contain a narrative
statement describing the nature of the proposed project. Each of the
proposal evaluation criteria referenced in this funding announcement
must be addressed, specifically and individually in narrative form. The
proposal must include at least the following:
(1) Project Title Page. The Title Page must include the following:
Title of the project, names of principal investigators, and applicant
organization.
(2) Introduction. A concisely worded justification or rationale for
the proposal must be presented. Summarize the social and economical
statistical data (income, population, employment rate, poverty rate,
education attainment, etc.), for the project area that substantiates
the need for the initiative. Specify, whether the target area includes
an Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community, Champion Community,
Federally-recognized Indian reservation or other Federally declared
economic disaster area. An applicant should address the ``Economic Need
of Community'' evaluation criterion in Section VII.1.(c).
(3) Workplan. Discuss the approach (strategy) to be used in
carrying out the proposed project outreach and achieving the proposed
objectives. Address the ``Statement of Work'' evaluation criterion in
Section VII.1.(e). A description of any subcontracting arrangements to
be used in carrying out the proposed project must be included. The
workplan also must include:
(i) Overview: Identify and discuss the specific goals and
objectives of the proposed project and its impact on the proposed
beneficiaries;
(ii) Timeframes: Develop a tentative timeline for completing the
major tasks outlined in the project proposal;
(iii) Milestones: Describe and quantify the expected outcomes of
the proposed project, including the businesses created, professionals
trained, jobs created or assisted, conferences and seminars conducted,
and number of participants, loans packaged, etc.;
(iv) Recipient involvement: Identify the person(s) responsible for
performing the project tasks; and
(v) USDA Rural Development involvement: Identify USDA Rural
Development responsibilities for assisting and monitoring project
tasks;
(4) Estimated Budget. Provide a detailed budget justification,
showing both federal and applicant's matching funds, including in-kind
contributions. Provide a budget to support the work plan showing all
sources and uses of funds during the project period. Detail and
document both cash and in-kind by sources. Note that only goods and
services for which no expenditure is made can be considered in-kind. If
the applicant is paying for the goods and services as part of the
matching funds contribution, the expenditure is considered a cash
match, and should be verified as such.
(5) Certification of Matching Funds. Certify that matching funds
will be available at the same time Federal funds are anticipated to be
spent and that matching funds will be spent in advance of Federal
funding, such that for every dollar of Federal funds advanced or
reimbursed, the applicant will have spent no less in proportion to the
spending of Federal funds received from the cooperative agreement prior
to submitting the request for reimbursement or advance. Please note
that this certification is a separate requirement from the verification
of Matching Funds requirement.
(6) Leveraging Funds. Discuss in narrative form how the institution
will use other Federal, State, private, and
[[Page 40315]]
other sources of funds and resources to leverage the proposed project.
(7) Coordination and Management Plan. Describe how the project will
be coordinated among the various participants, the nature of the
collaborations and benefits to participants, the communities, the
applicant, and Rural Development. Describe your plans for the
management of the project to ensure its proper and efficient
administration. Describe the scope of Rural Development's involvement
in the project.
(8) Technology Outreach. The project proposal must address the
applicant's ability to deliver computer technology to the targeted
rural communities and maintain computer Internet Web sites linking
community leaders and residents to available economic development
information. Address the ``Digital Technology Outreach'' evaluation
criterion in this Section VII.1.(f).
(9) Key Personnel Support. Provide the curriculum vitae for the key
personnel used to carry out the goals and objectives of the proposal.
(10) Facilities or Equipment. Identify where the project will be
located (housed) and what additional equipment is needed or already
available to carry out the specific objectives of the project.
(11) Previous Accomplishments. Summarize the institution's previous
outreach and development accomplishments work funded by USDA Rural
Development or similar outreach or development experiences. This is
especially important for first time applicants. Address the ``Previous
Accomplishments'' evaluation criterion in Section VII.1.(d).
(12) Local and USDA Rural Development State Office Support. Provide
letters of support from the local community such as businesses,
educational institutions, local governments, community-based
organizations, etc. Letters of support should demonstrate commitments
for tangible resources and or assistance. Include any letter from the
appropriate USDA Rural Development State Office evidencing its
opportunity for input into your proposal and its involvement. Identify
and discuss tangible support contained in the letters.
(13) Additional information. Provide any additional information
that demonstrates commitment for tangible resources and or that
supports your proposal. Additionally you are encouraged to provide any
strategic plan that has been developed to assist cooperative and
business development or entrepreneurship for the targeted communities.
V. Intergovernmental Review of Applications
Executive Order 12372 does apply to this program.
VI. Funding Restrictions
Based on Section 708 of Title 7 Consolidated Appropriations Act
2004, (Pub. L. 108-199) ``No funds appropriated by this Act may be used
to pay negotiated indirect cost rates on cooperative agreements or
similar arrangements between the United States Department of
Agriculture and nonprofit institutions in excess of 10 percent of the
total cost of the agreement when the purpose of such cooperative
arrangement is to carry out programs of mutual interest between the two
parties.'' Other funding restrictions are identified in Section III.
VII. Application Review
1. Criteria--Project proposals will be evaluated using the
following seven criteria. Each criterion is given the weight value
shown with total points equal to 100. The points assigned provide an
indication of the relative importance of each section and will be used
by the reviewers in evaluating the proposals. Points do not have to be
awarded for each criterion. After all proposals have been evaluated,
the Administrator may award an additional 10 discretionary points to
any proposal to obtain the broadest geographic distribution of the
funds, ensure a broad diversity of project proposals, or ensure a broad
diversity in the size of the awards.
(a) Support of Local Community (Up to 10 points)--This criterion
evaluates the support of local government, educational, community, and
business groups. Higher points will be awarded for proposals
demonstrating broad support from all components of the communities
served, particularly cooperative groups. Broad support is demonstrated
by tangible contributions, such as providing volunteers, computers, or
transportation or co-sponsoring workshops and conferences. Points will
be awarded based on the level of tangible contribution in comparison to
the size of the award. Tangible support must be stated in letters from
supporting entities.
(b) Matching Funds/Leveraging (Up to 10 points)--This criterion
evaluates the extent to which the institution has the capacity to
support the project with matching funds and leveraging additional funds
and resources from State, private, public and non-profit sources to
carry out this outreach and development initiative.
A maximum of 10 points will be awarded based upon the amount the
proposal exceeds the minimum 25 percent matching requirement.
Applicants will be required to provide matching funds or equivalent in-
kind in support of this project. Evidence of matching funds
availability must be provided. Funds or equivalent in-kind must be
available at the time at which the cooperative agreement is entered.
Matching funds points will be awarded as listed below.
>25 percent to 35 percent match........... 2 points.
>35 percent to 50 percent match........... 5 points.
>50 percent to 75 percent match........... 7 points.
>75 percent match......................... 10 points.
(c) Economic Need of Community (Up to 15 points)--This criterion
evaluates the economic need of the targeted communities.
Five points will automatically be awarded to project proposals with
at least one of the beneficiary communities located in a targeted
community(s): Empowerment Zones, Enterprise Communities, Champion
Communities, Federally-recognized Indian reservations, and other
federally declared economic depressed or disaster areas. The
application must state the name(s) and location(s) of the economically
depressed community(s) and the type(s) of targeted community
designation (i.e., Empowerment Zone).
Up to a maximum of 7 additional points will be awarded for
demonstrated economic need based upon the currently available poverty
rate of the targeted local community(s). An applicant may use targeted
county or community poverty rates. When multi-community proposals are
submitted, the over-all weighted average for all counties or
communities must be used. An applicant must use current (2000 Census)
poverty data for each targeted county or community. Points will be
awarded based upon the differences in the targeted county or
community's average poverty from the respective State poverty rate
(average targeted county or community poverty rate minus the respective
State poverty rate). Percents will be rounded to the next whole number.
Less than 3 percent....................... 0 points.
3-6 percent............................... 1 point.
7-10 percent.............................. 2 points.
11-15 percent............................. 5 points.
Greater than 15 percent................... 7 points.
Up to a maximum of 3 additional points may be awarded based upon
the applicant's ability to demonstrate or
[[Page 40316]]
identify other economic needs of the targeted communities, such as, but
not limited to, unemployment rates, education levels, and job
availability. An applicant must provide sufficient information for the
panel to properly evaluate and rate this criterion.
(d) Previous Accomplishments (Up to 10 points)--This criterion
evaluates the applicant's previous accomplishments with this initiative
and/or its demonstrative capacity to conduct similar projects.
One point will be awarded to an institution for each year it has
been awarded a cooperative agreement under this program up to a total
of 5 years. An applicant must provide evidence of satisfactorily
completing the cooperative agreement for each year for which credit is
claimed. Applicants with less than 5 recent years of awards in this
program may receive up to the maximum 5 points by highlighting the
applicant's previous performance in each of the past 5 years on
projects with cooperative and other business development and outreach
objectives. The applicant should discuss the potential impact of their
project upon the targeted underserved rural communities, as well as
describing previous similar outreach and development work.
Up to a maximum of 5 additional points may be awarded based upon an
applicant's ability to document the positive impact of its project upon
the targeted underserved rural communities. Positive entrepreneurial
developments should be emphasized. Points will be awarded if an
applicant demonstrates that its technical assistance resulted in the
creation of a business(s) in an economically challenged community or
that its educational programs have developed or improved upon the
professional skills of rural entrepreneurs. The applicant must provide
specific information as to the specific businesses created and/or
professional educational programs offered.
(e) Statement of Work (up to 45 points)--This criterion evaluates
the degree to which the proposed project addresses the major purposes
for the ``1890 Land Grant Institutions Rural Entrepreneurial Program
Outreach Initiative.'' Points will be awarded according to the degree
to which the statement of work reflects innovative strategies for
providing technical assistance for business creation in economically
challenged rural communities, for educational programs to develop and
improve upon the professional skills of rural entrepreneurs, and for
outreach and promotion of USDA Rural Development's.
Up to a maximum of 20 points will be awarded to proposed projects
that have a clearly and concisely stated work plan detailing goals and
objectives, timetables, expected results, and measurable outcomes for
providing technical assistance for business creation in economically
challenged rural communities. The greatest number of points will be
awarded to those proposed projects that demonstrate innovative and
creative ways to accomplish these goals.
Up to a maximum of 15 additional points will be awarded to proposed
projects that have a clearly and concisely stated work plan detailing
goals and objectives, timetables, expected results, and measurable
outcomes for educational programs to develop and improve upon the
professional skills of rural entrepreneurs (i.e.; sustainable
agricultural practices, real estate sales, real estate appraising,
accounting for small entrepreneurs, etc.) The greatest number of points
will be awarded to those proposed projects that demonstrate innovative
and creative ways to accomplish these goals.
Up to a maximum of 10 additional points will be awarded to proposed
projects for outreach and promotion of USDA Rural Development's
programs in small rural communities with the greatest economic need.
The greatest number of points will be awarded to those proposed
projects that demonstrate innovative and creative ways to accomplish
these goals.
All proposals must integrate substantial USDA Rural Development
involvement.
(f) Digital Technology Outreach (Up to 5 points)--This criterion
evaluates the applicant's experience and capacity to provide outreach
and assistance to targeted underserved rural communities through use of
computer technologies.
A maximum of 5 points will be awarded based upon the applicant's
demonstrated capacity to promote innovations and improvements in the
delivery of computer technology benefits, including a web presence to
underserved rural communities whose share in these benefits is
disproportionably low.
(g) Coordination and Management of the Project (Up to 5 points)--
This criterion evaluates the applicant's demonstrated capacity to
coordinate and manage the proposed project among the various
stakeholders.
Up to a maximum of 5 points will be awarded based upon the
applicant's ability to demonstrate broad and collaborative involvement
with the applicant's respective USDA Rural Development State Office on
the proposed project. This involvement and collaboration should
include, but not be limited to: (1) Evidence of any USDA Rural
Development State Office's input in and review of the applicant's
proposal, (2) a detailed plan for the State Office's continued
participation in the proposed project that includes specific
participatory tasks, and (3) a detailed plan as to how Rural
Development programs can be integrated into the proposed project.
2. Selection Process
Each application will be evaluated in a two-part process. First,
each application will be reviewed to ensure that both the applicant and
project meet the eligibility requirements as set forth in Section III.
All applicants deemed to be eligible will be scored based upon the
criteria set forth in Section VII.(1). Each eligible application will
be scored by at least two expert reviewers. The individual scores for
each application will be tallied and applications receiving the highest
scores will be recommended to the Administrator, RBS, for award. The
RBS Administrator has the final authority to award discretionary points
in accordance with Section VII.(1) and determine the applications to be
funded. If a tie score results after the proposals have been rated and
ranked, the tie will be resolved by the proposal with the largest
matching funds as a percent of the Federal amount of the award being
selected for award.
VIII. Award Administration
1. Award Notification
Upon completion of the review process, successful applicants will
be notified, in writing, by the USDA Rural Development National Office
of its award. Each successful applicant will receive a cooperative
agreement for signature by the institution's president or designee. The
document will become binding upon execution by the appropriate USDA
official.
Unsuccessful applicants will be notified, in writing, of the
results of review.
2. Advance of Funds Requirements
Requests for advance of funds must be submitted to the National
Office on a quarterly basis on a completed Form SF-270, ``Request for
Advance or Reimbursement.'' A completed Form SF-269 (Long Form),
``Financial Status Report,'' must be submitted with each advance of
funds request.
[[Page 40317]]
3. Project Reviews
USDA Rural Development State Office representatives will conduct
semi-annual onsite reviews of award recipients as well as any
additional reviews deemed necessary by the National Office.
4. Reporting Requirements
During the term of the cooperative agreement, each award recipient
must submit quarterly progress reports and a final report detailing the
tasks performed and results accomplished to the National and
appropriate State Office. Quarterly reports must be submitted on or
prior to January 31, April 28, and July 28, and October 31, 2006. A
final report must be submitted within 90 days of the date of the
project's completion. Reports may be submitted in hard copy original or
an electronic copy that includes all required signatures. Failure to
submit satisfactory, timely reports may result in suspension or
termination of award.
Upon the request of USDA Rural Development, the award recipient
will submit manuscripts, videotapes, software, or other media, as were
identified in project proposals. USDA Rural Development retains those
rights delineated in 7 CFR 3019.36.
5. Administrative Requirements
Award Recipients are responsible for:
(a) Completing the objectives as defined in the proposed workplan.
(b) Maintaining up-to-date project records during the term of the
agreement.
(c) Maintaining an accounting of Federal and matching fund
expenditures, including in-kind contributions. Award recipients must
submit to the National Office a completed Form SF-269 (Long Form) with
each advance of funds request and within 90 days of the project's
completion.
(d) Immediately refunding to USDA Rural Development, at the end of
the agreement, any balance of unobligated funds received from USDA
Rural Development.
(e) Providing matching funds or equivalent in-kind in support of
the project, at least to the level agreed to in the accepted proposal.
(g) Participating in the Annual or Bi-annual USDA Rural Development
Entrepreneurship and Information Conferences/Workshops when planned.
(h) In cooperation with local businesses, developing a program of
cooperative and business startup and technical assistance that will
assist with new company development, business planning, new enterprise,
franchise startup and consulting, business expansion studies, marketing
analysis, cashflow management, and seminars and workshops for
cooperatives and small businesses.
(i) Providing office space, equipment, and supplies for all
personnel assigned to the project.
(j) Developing management and technical assistance plans in
cooperation with USDA Rural Development State Office that will:
(1) Assess cooperative and small business alternatives to
agriculture, and other natural resources-based industries;
(2) Assist in the development of business plans and loan packages,
marketing, bookkeeping assistance, and organizational sustainability;
and
(3) In cooperation with USDA Rural Development State Office,
provide technical assistance and training in customer relations,
product development, and business planning and development.
(k) Assessing local community needs, weaknesses and strengths,
feasible alternatives to agriculture production, and the needed
infrastructure to expand or develop new or existing businesses. The
plans for any such studies must be submitted to the USDA Rural
Development National office for approval prior to the study being
conducted.
(l) In cooperation with the USDA Rural Development State Office,
providing community leaders with advice and recommendations regarding
best practices in community economic development stimulus programs for
their communities.
(m) Developing digital technology outreach and establishing and
maintaining an Internet web site, linking community leaders and
residents to available economic development information.
(n) Assuring and certifying that it is in compliance with, and will
comply in the course of the agreement with, all applicable laws,
regulations, Executive Orders, and other generally applicable
requirements, including those set out in 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019.
(o) Using Federal funds only to pay meeting-related travel expenses
when employees are performing a service of direct benefit to the
Government and in direct furtherance of the objectives of the proposed
agreement. Federal funds cannot be used to pay non-Federal employees to
attend meetings.
(p) Not commingling or using program funds for administrative
expenses to operate an intermediary relending program (IRP).
(q) Submitting to USDA Rural Development National Office, in
writing, any request for revising the project work plan, budget, or
requesting a no-cost extension amending the cooperative agreement.
(r) Assisting the USDA Rural Development State Office in conducting
a semi-annual on-site review of the recipient's project.
(s) Collaborating, as needed, with the USDA Rural Development
National and State Offices in performing the tasks in the agreement and
providing the Rural Development National Office with the information
necessary for Rural Development to fulfill its responsibilities in the
agreement.
USDA Rural Development is responsible for:
(1) Monitoring the program as it is being implemented and operated,
including monitoring of financial information to ensure that there is
no commingling or use of program funds for administrative expenses to
operate an IRP or other unapproved items.
(2) Terminating activity, after written notice, if tasks are not
met.
(3) Reviewing and approving changes to key personnel.
(4) Providing technical assistance as needed.
(5) Approving the final plans for any community business workshops;
cooperative, business, and economic development sessions; and training
workshops to be conducted by the recipient.
(6) Providing reference assistance, as needed, to the recipient for
technical assistance given on a one-on-one basis to entrepreneurs and
startup businesses.
(7) Reviewing and commenting on strategic plans developed by
recipients for targeted areas.
(8) Reviewing economic assessments made by the recipient for
targeted counties enabling USDA Rural Development to determine the
extent to which its programs are beneficial.
(9) Carefully screening projects to prevent First Amendment
violations.
(10) Monitoring the program to ensure that a web site link to USDA-
Rural Development is established and maintained.
(11) State Offices conducting semi-annual on-site reviews and
submitting written reports to the National Office.
(12) Participating in 1890 outreach and development program
workshops, seminars and conferences as needed.
(13) Providing any other work agreed to by USDA Rural Development
in the Cooperative Agreement.
IX. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact: Mr. Edgar L. Lewis, Program
Manager, Rural
[[Page 40318]]
Business-Cooperative Service, USDA, Stop 3252, Room 4221, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3252. Telephone: (202)
690-3407, e-mail: edgar.lewis@wdc.usda.gov.
X. Paperwork Reduction Act
The paperwork burden associated with this initiative has been
cleared by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB Control Number
0570-0041.
Dated: July 7, 2005.
David Rouzer,
Acting Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 05-13752 Filed 7-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P