Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amendment of Monograph for Over-the-Counter Bronchodilator Drug Products, 40237-40249 [05-13709]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, FDA
has tentatively concluded that the
proposed rule does not contain policies
that have federalism implications as
defined in the Executive order and,
consequently, a federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
VIII. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or three paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document and may be
accompanied by a supporting
memorandum or brief. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IX. Proposed Effective Date
FDA is proposing that any final rule
that may issue based on this proposal be
effective 180 days after its date of
publication in the Federal Register.
X. References
The following references are on
display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) under
Docket No. 1976N–0052G and may be
seen by interested persons between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
1. Woolcock, A. J., ‘‘Asthma,’’ Textbook of
Respiratory Medicine, 2nd ed., W. B.
Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, 2:1245–
1319, 1994.
2. ‘‘Global Strategy for Asthma
Management and Prevention. NHLBI/WHO
Workshop Report,’’ National Institutes of
Health Publication, no. 95–3659, January
1995.
3. ‘‘Guidelines for the Diagnosis and
Management of Asthma. National Asthma
Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP)
Expert Panel Report,’’ National Institutes of
Health Publication, Update on Selected
Topics 2002, pp. 115–116, 2002.
4. ‘‘Pediatric Asthma/Promoting Best
Practice. Guide for Managing Asthma in
Children,’’ American Academy of Allergy,
Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI), 1999.
5. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma,
and Immunology. Practice Parameters for the
Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma, Journal
of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 96(5
Part 2):S707–S870, 1995.
6. ‘‘Airway Mucus and the Mucociliary
System,’’ in Allergy: Principles and Practice,
edited by Middleton, E. M., et. al., 6th ed.,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
40237
Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri,
p. 753, 2003.
7. Lemanski, R. F., and W. W. Busse,
Journal of the American Medical Association,
278:1855–1873, 1997.
8. Henke, C. et al., ‘‘Combined
Bronchoscopy And Mucolytic Therapy For
Patients With Severe Refractory Status
Asthmaticus On Mechanical Ventilation: A
Case Report And Review Of The Literature,’’
Critical Care Medicine, 22(2):1880–1883,
1994.
9. ‘‘Standards for the Diagnosis and Care of
Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary
Disease. American Thoracic Society
Statement,’’ American Journal of Respiratory
Critical Care Medicine, 152:S77–S120, 1995.
10. IMS Health, Retail & Provider
Perspective, Year 2001, Data Extracted
December 2002. )(Proprietary data used by
FDA with the permission of IMS Health.)
11. IMS Health, Retail & Provider
Perspective, 2:449, January-December 2001.
(Proprietary data used by FDA with the
permission of IMS Health.)
this chapter) or in combination with any
oral nasal decongestant active
ingredient (listed in § 341.20 of this
chapter).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(27) [Date 180 days after date of
publication in the Federal Register], for
products subject to paragraph
(a)(6)(iv)(E) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Subjects
§ 341.40
21 CFR Part 310
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drugs, Labeling, Medical
devices, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
21 CFR Part 341
Labeling, Over-the-counter drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
21 CFR parts 310 and 341 (as proposed
in the Federal Register of August 12,
1988 (53 FR 30522)) be amended as
follows:
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 310 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 355, 360b–360f, 360j, 361(a), 371, 374,
375, 379e; 42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 242(a), 262,
263b–263n.
2. Section 310.545 is amended by
adding paragraphs (a)(6)(iv)(E) and
(d)(27) to read as follows:
§ 310.545 Drug products containing
certain active ingredients offered over-thecounter (OTC) for certain uses.
(a) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) * * *
(E) Approved as of [date 180 days
after date of publication in the Federal
Register]. Any oral bronchodilator
active ingredient (e.g., ephedrine,
ephedrine hydrochloride, ephedrine
sulfate, racephedrine hydrochloride, or
any other ephedrine salt) in
combination with any expectorant
active ingredient (listed in § 341.18 of
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 341 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 353,
355, 360, 371.
[Amended]
4. Proposed § 341.40 is amended by
removing paragraph (l) and
redesignating paragraphs (m) through
(bb) as paragraphs (l) through (aa)
respectively.
Dated: June 30, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–13708 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 341
PART 310—NEW DRUGS
PO 00000
PART 341—COLD, COUGH, ALLERGY,
BRONCHODILATOR, AND
ANTIASTHMATIC DRUG PRODUCTS
FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN
USE
[Docket No. 1995N–0205] (formerly Docket
No. 95N–0205)
RIN 0910–AF32
Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator,
and Antiasthmatic Drug Products for
Over-the-Counter Human Use;
Proposed Amendment of Monograph
for Over-the-Counter Bronchodilator
Drug Products
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Proposed rule; withdrawal of
previous proposed rule.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is proposing to
amend the final monograph (FM) for
over-the-counter (OTC) bronchodilator
drug products to add additional
warnings (e.g., an ‘‘Asthma alert’’) and
to revise the indications, warnings, and
directions in the labeling of products
containing the ingredients ephedrine,
ephedrine hydrochloride, ephedrine
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
40238
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
sulfate, epinephrine, epinephrine
bitartrate, racephedrine hydrochloride,
and racepinephrine hydrochloride. This
proposed rule is part of FDA’s ongoing
review of OTC drug products. FDA is
also withdrawing the proposed rule (see
the Federal Register of July 27, 1995 (60
FR 38643)) to remove the ephedrine
ingredients from the FM.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the proposed monograph
amendment and on FDA’s economic
impact determinations by November 10,
2005. The date of withdrawal of the July
27, 1995, proposed rule is July 13, 2005.
Please see section XI of this document
for the proposed effective date of any
final rule that may publish based on this
proposal.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. 1995N–0205
and/or RIN number 0910–AF32, by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Follow instructions for submitting
comments on the agency Web site.
• E-mail: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov.
Include Docket No. 1995N–0205 and/or
RIN number 0910–AF32 in the subject
line of your e-mail message.
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket No. or Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.fda.gov/
ohrms/dockets/default.htm, including
any personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm and insert the docket
number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cazemiro R. Martin or Gerald M.
Rachanow, Center for Drug Evaluation
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
and Research (HFD–560), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM)
B. Tentative Final Monograph (TFM)
and FM
C. Proposal to Remove Ephedrine
Ingredients From the OTC
Bronchodilator FM
II. Comments Received in Response to
the 1995 Proposal to Remove Ephedrine
Ingredients From the OTC
Bronchodilator FM
A. Number of Comments Received
B. Summary of Comments Received
III. FDA’s Response to the Comments
A. Asthma and Its Treatment With
Ephedrine
B. Benefit-Risk Assessment
C. Labeling for OTC Bronchodilator
Drug Products
D. Related FDA Regulatory Actions
E. Related DEA Regulatory Actions
IV. FDA’s Tentative Conclusions
A. Summary of Major Labeling
Changes
B. Statement About Warnings
V. Proposed Implementation
VI. Analysis of Impacts
A. Relabeling Costs
B. Regulatory Alternatives Considered
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VIII. Environmental Impact
IX. Federalism
X. Request for Comments
XI. Proposed Effective Date
XII. References
I. Background
A. Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM)
In the Federal Register of September
9, 1976 (41 FR 38312), FDA published,
under § 330.10(a)(6) (21 CFR
330.10(a)(6)), an ANPRM to establish a
monograph for OTC cold, cough,
allergy, bronchodilator, and
antiasthmatic drug products, together
with the recommendations of the
Advisory Review Panel on OTC Cold,
Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and
Antiasthmatic Drug Products (the
Panel), which was the advisory review
panel responsible for evaluating data on
the active ingredients in this drug class.
The Panel recommended that ephedrine
and epinephrine preparations be
category I (generally recognized as safe
and effective) for OTC bronchodilator
use (41 FR 38312 at 38370 through
38372).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. Tentative Final Monograph (TFM)
and FM
FDA concurred with the Panel in the
bronchodilator TFM (47 FR 47520 at
47527, October 26, 1982). FDA included
the following active ingredients in the
FM for OTC bronchodilator drug
products: Ephedrine ingredients
(ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride,
ephedrine sulfate, and racephedrine
hydrochloride) and epinephrine
ingredients (epinephrine, epinephrine
bitartrate, and racepinephrine
hydrochloride) (51 FR 35326 at 35339,
October 2, 1986). In this current
proposed rule, the term ‘‘ephedrine
ingredients’’ includes the four active
ingredients included in the FM; the
term ‘‘epinephrine ingredients’’
includes the three active ingredients
included in the FM; and the term ‘‘OTC
bronchodilator drug products’’ includes
products containing any of these seven
active ingredients.
C. Proposal to Remove Ephedrine
Ingredients From the OTC
Bronchodilator FM
In the Federal Register of July 27,
1995 (60 FR 38643), FDA published a
proposed rule (the 1995 proposal) to
amend the FM for OTC bronchodilator
drug products. It proposed to remove
the ephedrine ingredients (ephedrine,
ephedrine hydrochloride, ephedrine
sulfate, and racephedrine
hydrochloride) and to classify those
ingredients as not generally recognized
as safe and effective for OTC use. At that
time, FDA reassessed the benefit/risk of
OTC ephedrine drug products and
proposed their removal because of
safety concerns, including the potential
for these products to cause harm as a
result of misuse and abuse. Interested
persons were invited to submit written
comments or objections to the 1995
proposal and FDA’s economic impact
determination by August 28, 1995.
II. Comments Received in Response to
the 1995 Proposal to Remove Ephedrine
Ingredients From the OTC
Bronchodilator FM
A. Number of Comments Received
FDA received comments from 56
consumers, 37 health professionals, 8
manufacturers of OTC bronchodilator
drug products, 5 Federal and State
government agencies, 5 national
associations, 4 boards of pharmacy, 2
distributors of dietary supplements, 1
consulting firm, and 1 member of
Congress. Several comments addressed
FDA’s economic impact determination.
Copies of the comments and additional
information that have come to FDA’s
attention since publication of the 1995
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
proposal are on public display in the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES).
B. Summary of Comments Received
(Comment 1) Several comments
contended that the 1995 proposal does
not indicate whether FDA had analyzed
whether additional labeling warnings
(including restrictions on distribution)
would address FDA’s concerns about
safer OTC use of ephedrine drug
products, especially by young people.
The comments stated that FDA should
use its authority to amend current
product labeling warnings required by
the FM for OTC bronchodilator drug
products.
(Comment 2) The comments
suggested a number of reasons for the
potential unsafe use of OTC ephedrine
drug products:
• Virtually all of the unsafe use is
related to products with brand names
that promote the unapproved
pharmacological effects of ephedrine.
• Although these products are labeled
with the required FDA bronchodilator
labeling, they are promoted in the
marketplace as stimulants, weight loss
products, and performance enhancers.
• These products are readily available
for sale in convenience stores, service
stations, and truck stops or by magazine
mail order.
• Little or no restrictions exist on the
sale of these products to teenagers and
children.
• FDA and the Federal Trade
Commission have not utilized their
enforcement authority to address the
safety problems associated with
improper promotion of these products,
which is the main problem.
(Comment 3) Several comments made
suggestions concerning OTC sales of
these products. These included the
following recommendations:
• Proof of age should be required to
reduce purchase of these products by
children.
• Ephedrine and its salts should be
placed under schedule V of the
Controlled Substances Act to control
sales, while allowing people who have
a legitimate medical need for the
products to purchase them.
• States could restrict OTC sale of
ephedrine drug products.
(Comment 4) Many comments
supported FDA’s proposal to remove
ephedrine active ingredients from the
OTC marketplace. In addition, these
comments presented the following
arguments against the sale of all OTC
bronchodilator drug products:
• Easy access leads to self diagnosis,
results in the delay of treatment, and
may mask other symptoms.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
• People who use OTC
bronchodilators do not receive patient
education about their disease, about the
medication, or about the product’s
possible side effects on the heart and
central nervous system.
• OTC availability allows the products
to be sold to individuals of any age and
implies that mild asthma is not serious,
despite the fact that people with mild
asthma can die from the disease.
• People can make deadly mistakes if
they do not use these products properly.
• People do not, or cannot, read the
product’s warnings and do not always
understand or heed what they read.
• Parents often use these products for
their small children, even though
interaction with a pediatrician is
necessary for treating a child’s asthma.
• OTC bronchodilators are often used
for unintended purposes.
(Comment 5) Several comments cited
a number of problems occurring in their
States as a result of the unrestricted
availability of OTC ephedrine drug
products. These included the use of
higher than the labeled doses, prolonged
use of products, use for unapproved
indications (e.g., for weight loss and as
a stimulant), and improper use,
particularly by children.
(Comment 6) A few comments
addressed the OTC availability of
epinephrine aerosol dosage forms1 and
dietary supplements that contain
ephedrine alkaloids or ephedra.2
III. FDA’s Response to the Comments
After considering the comments
submitted for the 1995 proposal to
remove ephedrine and other active
ingredients from the FM, FDA is
withdrawing that proposal. The scope
and coverage of this current proposed
rule differ from the 1995 proposal. FDA
1 The 1995 proposal did not involve epinephrine
aerosol dosage forms. In the Federal Register of
May 20, 1996 (61 FR 25142), FDA amended the
bronchodilator drug products FM by removing
pressurized metered-dose aerosol container dosage
forms for the ingredients epinephrine, epinephrine
bitartrate, and racepinephrine hydrochloride. The
bronchodilator FM currently includes these three
epinephrine ingredients only for use in a hand-held
rubber bulb nebulizer (21 CFR 341.76(d)(2)).
Accordingly, because these ingredients in
pressurized metered-dose aerosol container dosage
forms are not included in this document, FDA is
not addressing the comments on this dosage form.
2 The 1995 proposal on OTC bronchodilator drug
products did not involve dietary supplements. FDA
has addressed dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids separately in a final rule that
published on February 11, 2004 (69 FR 6788), under
Docket No. 1995N–0304. The final rule declared
dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids
adulterated under section 402(f)(1)(A) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
342(f)(1)(A)) because they present an unreasonable
risk of illness or injury. Accordingly, dietary
supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids may
no longer be marketed in the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40239
has given serious consideration to the
various arguments presented by the
comments on the 1995 proposal, has
considered other information, and has
determined that ephedrine and other
bronchodilator ingredients should
remain in the FM for self-treatment of
mild bronchial asthma for several
reasons:
• There are people with diagnosed
mild bronchial asthma for whom the
benefits of symptomatic treatment with
OTC bronchodilators for temporary
wheezing, shortness of breath, and
tightness of chest outweigh the risks of
use.
• Additional labeling warnings and
directions in this current proposal
provide information to promote safer
use of these products.
• FDA has taken regulatory action
against ephedrine drug products with
misleading brand names that promoted
weight loss, enhancement of athletic
performance, or stimulant uses.
• Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) requirements restricting the sale
of ephedrine, its salts, optical isomers,
and salts of optical isomers that became
effective after FDA published the 1995
proposal are in effect and, among other
things, require single-ingredient
ephedrine drug products to be sold
behind the counter. Therefore, access to
these products is controlled.
A. Asthma and Its Treatment With
Ephedrine
Asthma is a chronic lung disease
caused by inflammation of the airways,
resulting in episodes of airway
narrowing and obstruction. Asthma can
be serious and should be diagnosed and
treated by a physician. Although there
is no cure for asthma, appropriate
management most often leads to control
of the condition. FDA notes that the
Panel stated that sympathomimetic
drugs (e.g., ephedrine) are used to
overcome the spasm that causes
narrowing of the bronchial air tubes,
and the usefulness of ephedrine is
limited to the milder forms of asthma
(41 FR 38312 at 38370 through 38371).
In assessing ephedrine, the Panel
relied on data from two studies
conducted in 1973 and 1975,
respectively. The patient population
enrolled in these studies was not only
clinically stable (i.e., normal
electrocardiogram, blood pressure, and
pulse), but also had no apparent history
of adverse events related to treatment
with other stimulant bronchodilators
used at the time. One study was a
double-blind comparison of 24
milligrams (mg) ephedrine and a
combination of 24 mg of ephedrine and
130 mg theophylline (41 FR 38312 at
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
40240
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
38371). Measurements including
specific airway resistance, vital
capacity, and forced expiratory volume
in 1 second (FEV1) showed that
ephedrine significantly decreased the
airway resistance and increased both
capacity and FEV1 over a 2-hour period.
This effect was enhanced and prolonged
by the presence of theophylline, a
prescription drug. The Panel cited
another study comparing ephedrine and
terbutaline (a prescription drug) in 26
asthmatics. The data indicated that 25
mg ephedrine resulted in significant
improvement in the pulmonary function
tests between 120 and 240 minutes after
taking a single dose (41 FR 38312 at
38371). The results were similar to 2.5
mg terbutaline, but less than the effect
of 5 mg terbutaline. These clinical
studies supported improvement in
pulmonary function tests between 2 and
4 hours after taking a single dose of 25
mg ephedrine, with the improvements
lasting up to 4 hours. These studies
support the use of ephedrine for
patients with asthma who are otherwise
clinically stable (i.e., not found by a
physician to have high blood pressure
or other cardiovascular risk).
Ephedrine is an a and b adrenergic
agonist and also enhances the release of
norepinephrine from sympathetic
neurons. In addition to its
bronchodilation effect, other effects of
ephedrine are related to its
pharmacodynamic actions through a
and b adrenergic receptors (Ref. 1).
These include awareness of heart beat,
rapid heart beat, and variable increases
of blood pressure. The Panel indicated
that a study by Dulfano and Glass on 26
asthmatics between 28 and 61 years old
showed that (at measured intervals of
15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes)
a single dose of 25 mg ephedrine had no
significant effect on either heart rate or
blood pressure (41 FR 38312 at 38370).3
The Panel also cited a study by Tashkin
and Simmons of the cardiovascular
effects of 25 mg ephedrine (over a 7hour period) in 20 asthmatics. The
Panel noted that there was only a
modest increase in heart rate of up to 11
beats per minute as a maximum, and the
3 The authors reported maximal cardiovascular
effects at 180 minutes after administration of
ephedrine compared to control (baseline): Heart rate
(beats per minute) decreased from 91.6 to 83.1;
blood pressure (millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)),
systolic increased from 127.8 to 129.9 and diastolic
increased from 81.0 to 82.4.
4 The authors reported that after ephedrine, mean
heart rate was significantly higher than control
(baseline) values (average 7.4 to 10.9 beats per
minute) at 2 to 5 hours as well as mean placebo
values (average 7.7 to 10.6 beats per minute at 2,
4, and 5 hours). The authors measured blood
pressure over a 7-hour period after the subjects took
ephedrine.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
systolic and diastolic blood pressure
showed no significant change (41 FR
38312 at 38370).4
In 1988, Chua and Benrimoj reviewed
the blood pressure effects of OTC
sympathomimetic drugs, including
ephedrine (Ref. 2). They made the
following observations:
• McLaurin et al. (1961) and Laitinen
et al. (1982) found 25 mg of ephedrine
produced no significant effect on blood
pressure and heart rate of normotensive
patients.
• Tashkin et al. (1975) obtained
similar results when comparing the
cardiovascular and bronchial effects of
terbutaline with ephedrine.
• Bye et al. (1974) demonstrated a
significant rise in systolic blood
pressure of 17 and 7 millimeters of
mercury (mm Hg) with 50 and 25 mg of
ephedrine, respectively, but no effect on
diastolic blood pressure.
• Elis et al. (1967) showed that a single
oral dose of 30 mg ephedrine produced
an average increase in mean arterial
blood pressure of 5 mm Hg.
• Drew et al. (1978) showed that oral
doses of 60 mg ephedrine produced
significant increases in systolic and
diastolic blood pressure in
normotensive subjects.
• The discrepancy between Bye et al.
and McLaurin et al. may be due to the
different parameters analyzed and the
time intervals for blood pressure
measurement.
Other information also supports a
pressor effect (increases blood pressure)
of ephedrine. Intravenous ephedrine is
used to increase blood pressure in
patients with hypotension during spinal
and epidural anesthesia, particularly
during obstetrical procedures (Ref. 3).
In the recent final rule on dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids (69 FR 6788, February 11,
2004), FDA discussed the results from a
study by Boozer et al. (Ref. 4). That
study evaluated the blood pressure
effects of a combination of ephedrine
alkaloids and caffeine compared to
placebo over a 6-month period. Using
automated blood pressure
measurements over 24 hours at weeks 1,
2, and 4, the ephedrine alkaloid and
caffeine group had significantly higher
blood pressure measurements after 4
weeks of treatment. The effect reported
in this study cannot be attributed to the
caffeine because the effect of caffeine on
blood pressure is transient, and the
acute effect of caffeine to increase blood
pressure is lost within 2 weeks of
continued use (69 FR 6788 at 6802).
FDA finds that the collective evidence
suggests that ephedrine at doses
recommended for a bronchodilator
effect causes elevation of blood
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
pressure. Some individuals who use
ephedrine are at risk of experiencing
adverse effects from therapy because of
ephedrine’s effect on blood pressure.
Despite the results of the Boozer study
and other evidence, FDA considers the
therapeutic benefits of ephedrine as an
OTC bronchodilator outweigh its effects
in elevating blood pressure based on its
temporary and intermittent use. (See
also section III.B of this document.)
According to the National Asthma
Education and Prevention Program
guidelines, mild intermittent asthma is
defined as having symptoms no more
than twice a week during the day or
twice a month at night (Ref. 5). Between
asthmatic episodes, these asthmatics
have no symptoms and can maintain a
normal level of activity. FDA has
determined that people with mild
intermittent asthma are the only
category of asthmatics who should be
candidates for oral ephedrine.
Asthmatics with more severe asthma
disease (i.e., persistent asthma) should
be under the care of a physician for
consideration of additional therapy to
control the disease (Ref. 6).
The Panel noted that wide use of
epinephrine aerosols for temporary
relief of milder forms of asthma has
been attended by few and mild side
effects. The Panel cited a double-blind
study in asthmatics during which
epinephrine aerosol demonstrated a
significant increase in bronchial air flow
in 15 minutes accompanied by
symptomatic relief, whereas the placebo
gave little change (41 FR 38312 at
38372). The Panel concluded that
epinephrine is a safe and effective OTC
bronchodilator ingredient when used
according to recommended labeling,
and FDA included epinephrine in the
FM (51 FR 35326 at 35332 through
35333).
B. Benefit-Risk Assessment
FDA has done a benefit-risk
assessment of the different uses of
ephedrine ingredients. FDA has
determined, based on its review of the
available information, that the benefits
of single-dose ephedrine ingredients for
the temporary relief of mild asthma
outweigh the risks. In contrast, FDA
determined for dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids that the
risks of use outweigh any benefits.
In the Federal Register of February
11, 2004, FDA declared dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids adulterated under the act
because they present an unreasonable
risk of illness or injury based on a riskbenefit analysis (69 FR 6788 at 6824).
After reviewing the available data on
weight loss, enhancement of athletic
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
performance, eased breathing in healthy
individuals, and other uses, FDA
concluded that the data do not indicate
that these dietary supplement products
containing ephedrine alkaloids provide
a benefit sufficient to outweigh the
risks. FDA stated that there is sufficient
evidence to conclude that ephedrine
alkaloids can increase blood pressure
and heart rate. FDA also stated that
dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids ‘‘expose users to
several risks, including the
consequences of a sustained increase in
blood pressure (e.g., serious illnesses or
injuries that include stroke and heart
attack that can result in death) and
increased morbidity and mortality from
worsened heart failure and
proarrhythmic effects’’ (69 FR 6788 at
6827). FDA also stated that although the
proarrhythmic effects of dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids typically occur only in
susceptible individuals, the long-term
risks from elevated blood pressure can
occur even in nonsusceptible, healthy
individuals (69 FR 6788 at 6827). FDA
concluded that dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids are
adulterated because they present an
unreasonable risk of illness or injury
under the conditions of use
recommended or suggested in labeling
or, if no conditions of use are suggested
or recommended in labeling, under
ordinary conditions of use. FDA does
not consider its decision on the use of
ephedrine alkaloids in dietary
supplements as precluding the use of
sympathomimetic ingredients in other
regulated products for appropriate
populations. The benefits compared to
risks should be analyzed in each
instance.
In the clinical studies discussed in
section III.A of this document,
ephedrine demonstrated a
bronchodilator effect in subjects with
mild asthma. This bronchodilator effect
provides temporary relief of shortness of
breath, tightness of the chest, and
wheezing due to bronchial asthma.
These OTC ephedrine drug products
provide health benefits when used by
appropriate populations (i.e., mild
asthmatics) for a limited period of time
by relieving the symptoms of an asthma
attack and possibly reducing symptom
progression. Relieving symptoms of a
mild asthma attack is an important
benefit. The relief of symptoms enables
an asthmatic to perform normal
everyday activities without restrictions
brought on by shortness of breath. The
finding that OTC single-ingredient
ephedrine drug products provide a
health benefit for mild asthmathics
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
justifies the continued marketing of
such products despite the risks. This
favorable benefit-risk assessment
distinguishes ephedrine as a drug from
FDA’s unfavorable benefit-risk
assessment for dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids.
FDA’s decision in this proposed rule
to have a different position for OTC
drug products that contain ephedrine
compared to dietary supplements that
contain ephedrine alkaloids is not
arbitrary or capricious. The decision is
based on differences in the intended
uses of these products, as well as
differences in the scientific evidence
available to support the risk-benefit
ratio for the products. The risk-benefit
ratio is dependent on several factors,
including the product’s intended use,
the product’s benefits, if any, and the
availability of adequate measures to
control risk.
FDA recognizes the risks associated
with ephedrine containing drug
products. However, there are several
differences between OTC drug products
containing ephedrine and dietary
supplements that contain ephedrine
alkaloids that may be relevant to the
differing risk-benefit profiles of these
products.
• Ephedrine used in a drug product in
the treatment of asthma needs to meet
the United States Pharmacopeia (USP)
standards of identity, strength, quality,
and purity. The USP ingredients contain
not less than 98 or 98.5 percent and not
more than 100.5 or 101 percent of the
declared amount of ephedrine,
ephedrine hydrochloride, or ephedrine
sulfate (Ref. 7). The botanical sources of
ephedrine that were used in dietary
supplement products did not have to
meet USP standards and contained
varying amounts of ephedrine and other
ephedrine alkaloids depending upon the
botanical species that were used.
Although the proportions of the various
ephedrine alkaloids in botanical species
vary from one species to another, in
most species used commercially,
ephedrine was typically the
predominant alkaloid in the raw
material (69 FR 6788 at 6789).
• Botanical sources of ephedrine
alkaloids contain ephedrine and other
sympathomimetics, including
norephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
methylephedrine. All of these
compounds are pharmacologically
active and have variable effects on
adrenergic receptors. These variable
effects depend on several factors
including dosages, route of
administration, and individual
susceptibility (Ref. 8). For example, in
the Hemorrhagic Stroke Project Study,
the use of phenylpropanolamine (a
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40241
sympathomimetic drug) was associated
with a statistically significant increased
risk for hemorrhagic stroke (Ref. 9)
whereas pseudoephedrine was not (Ref.
10). The combination of
sympathomimetic compounds may have
additional pharmacological effects on
the cardiovascular system compared to
ephedrine alone and, as a consequence,
may have additive risks.
• In previous Federal Register notices
(47 FR 35344, August 13, 1982; 48 FR
52513, November 18, 1983; and 49 FR
26814, June 29, 1984), FDA recognized
the negative consequences of combining
multiple sympathomimetic ingredients
or a sympathomimetic plus caffeine in
the same drug product. In these notices,
FDA defined any drug product
containing ephedrine in combination
with phenylpropanolamine or caffeine
as a new drug requiring a new drug
application for marketing. At the time,
FDA was concerned about the additive
effects of the combination of two or
more sympathomimetic ingredients
without any demonstrated enhanced
benefit. FDA has not permitted
marketing of OTC drug products
containing more than one
sympathomimetic drug because of safety
concerns.
FDA has received and evaluated
adverse reaction reports on both drug
products containing ephedrine and
dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids. Based on the
differences in composition described in
the previous paragraphs between the
drug products and dietary supplements,
adverse event data for dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids may not be completely
applicable to OTC ephedrine drug
products.
FDA acknowledges that OTC drug
products containing ephedrine
ingredients may be used by consumers
who are obese or have high blood
pressure and that these products can
cause adverse events. Because
sympathomimetic ingredients may pose
risks for adverse events, even after a
single dose, FDA has considered the
benefits and risks associated with the
use of these products by these
consumers. While OTC ephedrine drug
products are not without risk, they have
demonstrated benefit for asthmatics in
the intermittent and temporary
treatment of the symptoms associated
with mild asthma. FDA concludes that
the benefit from lessening the severity of
an asthma attack outweighs the risk of
an increase in blood pressure when OTC
ephedrine drug products are taken in
accordance with a warning to ask a
doctor before use if you have heart
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
40242
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
disease or high blood pressure and with
the recommended dosage.
After reviewing the safety and
effectiveness information on ephedrine
in OTC drug products, FDA has
determined that the benefits of OTC
drug products containing single
ingredient ephedrine outweigh the risk
when the product is used according to
labeled instructions. In determining that
the benefit outweighs the risk for the
marketing of ephedrine in OTC drug
products, FDA finds that there
continues to be a clinically meaningful
benefit derived by asthmatics using
these products on an intermittent basis
for the temporary relief of
bronchospasm. FDA continues to
believe that OTC drug products
containing single ingredient ephedrine
are generally recognized as safe and
effective and are not misbranded under
the conditions of use in the
bronchodilator FM and with the
labeling in this proposed rule.
C. Labeling for OTC Bronchodilator
Drug Products
Product labeling (indications,
warnings, and directions) is important
for the safe and effective use of
ephedrine OTC drug products. The
current and new proposed labeling
instructs asthmatics how to use the
product correctly in order to minimize
risks. Labeling recommends use only for
the intermittent treatment of mild
symptoms of asthma. Labeling also
alerts certain populations with
conditions that increase the risk of
adverse events to seek advice from a
health care provider before using the
product. Any deviation from the
labeling may put an asthmatic at
increased risk for an adverse event and
prevent maximum benefit from the
drug. For example, if an asthmatic uses
an OTC ephedrine drug product on a
daily basis over a prolonged period of
time because of recurrent symptoms,
there are increased risks associated with
the long-term use of ephedrine and with
inadequate treatment of the asthma
condition. The indications, warnings,
and directions (including dosage
directions) define the conditions of use
of the ingredient. If the drug is not used
as labeled, the risks may outweigh the
benefits of the drug. The proposed new
labeling for OTC bronchodilator drug
products is intended to inform
asthmatics about the safe and effective
use of these drug products. The labeling
is also intended to inform asthmatics
that if their asthma condition worsens,
with more frequent or more severe
symptoms, they should immediately
consult a physician to reassess the
management of the asthmatic condition
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
and to consider an alternative drug
therapy.
FDA stated in the dietary supplement
rule that warning statements cannot
adequately protect consumers from the
risks associated with dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids (69 FR 6788 at 6828). In this
proposed rule, FDA is proposing new
warning statements and labeling to
minimize the risks associated with
taking OTC drug products containing
ephedrine ingredients. The difference is
based on the favorable benefit-risk ratio
associated with the OTC drug products
containing ephedrine ingredients for the
treatment of mild asthma. Unlike
dietary supplements, OTC drug
products have demonstrated benefits in
the treatment and mitigation of disease.
Based on controlled clinical
investigations (see § 330.10(a)(4)(ii)),
FDA determined that the benefits
associated with the use of OTC drug
products containing ephedrine for
disease indications outweigh the risks
and justify the use of these products
despite their risks. However, such uses
for disease mitigation and treatment are
beyond the scope of permissible dietary
supplement uses (69 FR 6788 at 6810).
FDA considers the OTC drug products
containing ephedrine ingredients to be
safe and effective and not misbranded
for the treatment of physician-diagnosed
mild cases of asthma when
appropriately labeled, including
appropriate warning statements. The
FM contains labeling that advises a user
of these products:
• Not to use this drug unless a
diagnosis of asthma has been made by
a doctor,
• Not to use the drug if you have
certain medical conditions, and
• To consult a doctor when the drug
does not provide relief within a specific
time interval or causes side effects that
persist.
FDA continues to consider the two
types of currently marketed OTC
bronchodilator sympathomimetic
ingredients, ephedrine and epinephrine,
to be safe and effective for the selftreatment of mild asthma. These
ingredients have slightly different
actions. Oral ephedrine provides less
bronchial muscle relaxation but has a
more sustained effect than inhaled
epinephrine. FDA recognizes that use of
OTC epinephrine aerosol drug products
to relieve the symptoms of mild asthma
may elicit sympathomimetic effects
similar to those elicited by oral
ephedrine ingredients. Consequently,
because of the pharmacological
similarities of these two
sympathomimetic active ingredients,
FDA considers similar labeling of OTC
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ephedrine and epinephrine drug
products necessary to inform consumers
of the safe and effective use of these
OTC drug products. As previously
stated, FDA continues to believe that
people with mild asthma can properly
use OTC bronchodilator drug products
to self-treat occasional wheezing,
shortness of breath, and tightness of
chest after their asthma has been
diagnosed by a physician. FDA has
determined, however, that to help
ensure safe and effective use and to
minimize the risks of OTC
bronchodilator drug products,
additional labeling is needed for these
products.
1. Uses
The current indications for OTC
bronchodilator use are in § 341.76(b)(1)
and (b)(2). The primary indication is
‘‘For temporary relief of shortness of
breath, tightness of chest, and wheezing
due to bronchial asthma’’
(§ 341.76(b)(1)).
The labeling of the product may also
state one or both of the following uses
(§ 341.76(b)(2)):
• ‘‘For the’’ (select one of the following:
‘‘temporary relief’’ or ‘‘symptomatic control’’)
‘‘of bronchial asthma.’’
• ‘‘Eases breathing for asthma patients’’
(which may be followed by: ‘‘by reducing
spasms of bronchial muscles’’).
Two of these indication statements
mention temporary relief, while the
third statement does not. Also, in the
second statement manufacturers have
the option of selecting either
‘‘temporary relief’’ or ‘‘symptomatic
control.’’ For safe and appropriate use,
these use statements should inform
consumers that these products are to be
used for temporary relief of occasional
symptoms of mild asthma. Therefore,
FDA is proposing to revise the
indication statement in § 341.76(b) to a
single statement as follows: ‘‘for
temporary relief of occasional symptoms
of mild asthma: [bullet] wheezing
[bullet] tightness of chest [bullet]
shortness of breath’’.
2. Warnings
a. Warnings related to effects on the
cardiovascular system. Oral ephedrine
has effects on the cardiovascular system
(Refs. 11 through 14). Cardiovascular
effects include elevation of the systolic
and diastolic blood pressure (Ref. 11).
Other effects include awareness of
heartbeat and rapid heartbeat
accompanied usually by some elevation
of blood pressure (Ref. 14). Pressor
responses are due partly to
vasoconstriction but mainly to cardiac
stimulation. The force of myocardial
contraction is enhanced by the drug,
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
and cardiac output is augmented,
provided venous return is adequate. The
renal, abdominal, and intestinal blood
flows are decreased; whereas the
coronary, cerebral, and muscle blood
flows are increased (Ref. 11).
FDA is aware of reported adverse drug
events on the cardiovascular system
associated with the use of ephedrinecontaining drug products. Similar
events have been reported for dietary
supplement products containing
ephedrine alkaloids (69 FR 6788 at 6814
through 6815). The reported adverse
events include elevations in blood
pressure and/or heart beat, and serious
adverse events include abnormal heart
rhythm (arrhythmias), heart attack, and
stroke. These adverse events are
consistent with the known
pharmacology of sympathomimetic
drugs, as reported in the literature. The
reports we have received for ephedrine
containing bronchodilator drug
products were associated with use that
was more frequent or in higher amounts
than the labeled dose. However, even at
recommended doses, many people have
an increased risk for a serious side effect
to occur.
Sympathomimetic drugs, including
ephedrine ingredients, mimic the effects
(stimulation of the sympathetic nervous
system) of naturally occurring
epinephrine and norepinephrine (Ref.
11). In addition to their direct
pharmacological effects, many of these
ingredients also stimulate the release of
norepinephrine from nerve endings. The
release of norepinephrine further
increases the sympathomimetic effects
of these drugs on the body, at least
transiently. Susceptible individuals,
who have coronary artery disease or
heart failure and use sympathomimetic
drugs, are at increased risk for serious
adverse events, including heart attack,
stroke, and death. Sympathomimetic
drugs also can cause abnormal heart
rhythms (pro-arrhythmic effect) and can
induce cardiac arrhythmias in
susceptible individuals, such as those
with underlying coronary artery disease,
heart failure, or an abnormal cardiac
conduction system.
Over longer periods of use, the risk for
adverse health effects to susceptible
individuals becomes greater due to a
sustained elevation in blood pressure.
Ephedrine and epinephrine ingredients
are expected to, and evidence indicates
that they do, have similar
pharmacological effects, such as
increased blood pressure and heart rate,
to those of other sympathomimetic
ingredients (Refs. 11 and 12). The
pharmacological effects of ephedrine
and epinephrine (and other
sympathomimetics), both efficacious
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
and adverse, will vary dependent of the
dose, route of administration (e.g., oral
versus inhaled), and individual
susceptibility.
Based on reports that FDA has
received, the risk of adverse events from
ephedrine can occur at any dosage and
may increase when taking a higher dose
or taking more frequent doses than at
the recommended dosing interval.
Therefore, FDA proposes to revise
product labeling to inform consumers
that use of an OTC bronchodilator drug
product can cause an increase in blood
pressure and heart rate, which could
lead to more serious problems such as
heart attack, stroke, and death; and the
risks for these problems may increase if
the product is taken at higher doses or
more frequently than recommended.
The labeling also warns consumers
against the use of any OTC
bronchodilator drug products without a
physician’s diagnosis of asthma, and
directs consumers to consult with a
doctor before use, if they have a
diagnosis of certain conditions, such as
heart disease and high blood pressure.
The proposed labeling for these
products has been modified from the
labeling in the FM to follow the ‘‘Drug
Facts’’ format in § 201.66 (21 CFR
201.66). This standardized format and
content for product labeling is intended
to enable consumers to better read and
understand the labeling information and
to promote the safe and effective use of
OTC drug products. The Drug Facts
labeling format provides a more
structured, organized, and compact
presentation of the proposed labeling
information for these products.
Accordingly, the proposed labeling
should help consumers to use these
OTC bronchodilator drug products more
safely and effectively.
Current labeling in § 341.76(c)(2)
states ‘‘Do not use this product if you
have heart disease, high blood pressure,
* * *.’’ In this proposed rule, FDA is
adding the following statements under
the heading ‘‘When using this product’’:
‘‘[Bullet] increased blood pressure or
heart rate can occur, which could lead
to more serious problems such as heart
attack, stroke, and death. Your risk may
increase if you take more frequently or
more than the recommended dose.
[Bullet] * * * rapid heart beat * * *
may occur. If these symptoms persist or
get worse, consult a doctor right away.’’
b. Warnings related to effects on the
nervous system (central and peripheral).
Ephedrine is known to elicit
physiological responses similar to
catecholamines (i.e., groups of
chemically related neurotransmitters,
such as epinephrine, norepinephrine,
and dopamine). These drugs have
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40243
stimulant effects on the sympathetic
nervous system and thus are classified
as sympathomimetic agents (i.e., agents
stimulating the sympathetic nervous
system (Refs. 12 and 13)). The central
effects of ephedrine and epinephrine
ingredients include tenseness,
nervousness, tremor, and sleeplessness.
The peripheral effects primarily include
the effects on the cardiovascular system.
The central nervous system effects
appear to limit the maximally tolerated
dose, which varies widely among
individuals as judged by clinical
experience (Ref. 14). Overdose results in
exaggeration of the side effects which
individuals describe as disagreeable and
may help to limit overuse or abuse.
Reported adverse drug events and the
known pharmacological data associated
with the use of ephedrine and
epinephrine ingredients include
nervousness, tremor, and seizure.
Because of these effects, FDA is
proposing to revise product labeling to
inform consumers that use of OTC
bronchodilator drug products more
frequently or at higher doses than
recommended may cause adverse effects
such as seizure and tremor. Current
labeling in § 341.76(c)(5)(ii) states
‘‘Some users of this product may
experience nervousness, tremor,
sleeplessness * * *. If these symptoms
persist or get worse, consult your
doctor.’’ In this proposed rule, FDA is
placing these warnings under the
heading ‘‘When using this product’’
(§ 341.76(c)(4)(ii)) and adding seizure to
this warning to read as follows:
‘‘• nervousness, sleeplessness, * * *,
tremor, and seizure may occur. If these
symptoms persist or get worse, consult
a doctor right away.’’
FDA is aware that persons with
seizure disorders who use ephedrine are
at increased risk for experiencing a
seizure (Refs. 15, 16, and 17).
Epinephrine ingredients have similar
pharmacological effects (Refs. 11 and
12). Therefore, in this proposed rule,
FDA is amending the warnings to add
‘‘seizures’’ as one of the conditions for
which a person should ask a doctor
before using OTC bronchodilator drug
products.
c. Warnings related to effects on
urination. Ephedrine and epinephrine
ingredients may cause difficulty in
urination in males, particularly in older
males, who might have an enlarged
prostate gland. Current labeling in
§ 341.76(c)(2) states ‘‘Do not use this
product if you have * * * difficulty in
urination due to enlargement of the
prostate gland.’’ In this proposed rule,
FDA is simplifying this language under
the heading ‘‘Ask a doctor before use if
you have’’ to read ‘‘* * * trouble
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
40244
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
urinating due to an enlarged prostate
gland’’.
d. Warnings related to glaucoma.
Current warnings in the monograph for
OTC bronchodilator drug products do
not include any information about
glaucoma. Glaucoma is a group of
diseases that are distinguished by an
increase in pressure inside the eye.
There are two major types of glaucoma:
(1) Chronic or primary open-angle
glaucoma and (2) acute closed-angle
glaucoma (also known as narrow angle
glaucoma). Approximately 90 to 95
percent of people with glaucoma have
the open-angle variety, while 5 to 10
percent have closed-angle glaucoma
(Ref. 18). Normally, aqueous humor (a
clear fluid produced within the eye)
drains out of the eye through a drainage
site. However, in people with narrow
angle glaucoma, sympathomimetic
drugs (e.g., ephedrine) cause pupil
dilatation (mydrasis) that may result in
blockage of the normal drainage site
(Refs. 18 through 21). Because the fluid
within the eye cannot drain properly in
these predisposed individuals, the fluid
pressure inside the eyeball increases
quickly, leading to the symptoms of
narrow angle glaucoma (Ref. 19).
Therefore, in this proposed rule, FDA is
proposing to add ‘‘narrow angle
glaucoma’’ as one of the conditions
under the warning subheading ‘‘Ask a
doctor before use if you have’’.
FDA considers it beneficial for
consumers to know this information and
encourages them to ask their physician
in order to be fully informed. FDA has
previously included this type of
information in the labeling of OTC
ophthalmic vasoconstrictor drug
products containing topically applied
ephedrine (21 CFR 349.75(c)(2)).
e. Warnings related to nausea and
loss of appetite. Ephedrine may cause
nausea and loss of appetite in some
people. Current labeling in
§ 341.76(c)(5)(ii) states ‘‘Some users of
this product may experience * * *
nausea and loss of appetite. If these
symptoms persist or get worse, consult
your doctor.’’ In this proposed rule,
FDA is deleting ‘‘nausea’’ and ‘‘loss of
appetite’’ as side effects because they
are minor in comparison to other side
effects included in product labeling.
f. Warnings related to interactions
with drugs used for psychiatric or
emotional conditions. Current labeling
in § 341.76(c)(4) contains a drug
interaction precaution not to use an
OTC bronchodilator drug product ‘‘if
you are now taking a prescription
monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI)
(certain drugs for depression,
psychiatric, or emotional conditions
* * *).’’ In this proposed rule, to be
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
consistent with the Drug Facts labeling
format in § 201.66, FDA is deleting the
words ‘‘Drug interaction precaution.’’
FDA believes that the information about
MAOIs in the labeling may be
ineffective because some users of OTC
bronchodilator drug products may not
know that a drug they are taking is an
MAOI. In this proposed rule, FDA is
including information about the use of
prescription drugs for depression or
psychiatric or emotional conditions
under the subheading ‘‘Ask a doctor or
pharmacist before use if you are’’.
Therefore, in this proposed rule, FDA is
including an additional warning:
‘‘• Ask a doctor or pharmacist before
use if you are taking prescription drugs
for * * * depression, or psychiatric or
emotional conditions’’.
g. Warnings related to interactions
with other drugs, foods, and beverages.
FDA is aware that certain other drugs,
foods, and beverages can interact with
OTC ephedrine and epinephrine
ingredients and cause an increased
stimulant effect. The drugs include
other sympathomimetic agents such as
pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine,
phenylpropanolamine, and caffeine.
Some foods and beverages contain
caffeine, and some dietary supplements
contain other ingredients reported or
claimed to have a stimulant effect.
FDA previously determined that
certain combinations of these
ingredients presented a potential hazard
to health. In the Federal Register of
August 13, 1982 (47 FR 35344), FDA
announced that it had determined that
combination drug products consisting of
caffeine, phenylpropanolamine, and
ephedrine are new drugs and are
required to be the subject of an
approved new drug application.
A number of sympathomimetic
amines have been marketed as
prescription drugs used for the
treatment of obesity. These include
benzphetamine hydrochloride,
dextroamphetamine sulfate,
diethylpropion hydrochloride,
methamphetamine hydrochloride,
phendimetrazine tartrate, phentermine
hydrochloride and phentermine resin,
and sibutramine hydrochloride
monohydrate. These sympathomimetic
drugs can interact with OTC ephedrine
and epinephrine bronchodilator drug
products (also sympathomimetics) and
cause an increased stimulant effect.
Current labeling in § 341.76(c)(3) states
‘‘Do not use this product * * * if you
are taking any prescription drug for
asthma unless directed by a doctor.’’ In
this proposed rule, FDA is adding
‘‘obesity’’ and ‘‘weight control’’ to this
warning, which now appears under the
subheading ‘‘Ask a doctor or pharmacist
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
before use if you are,’’ to read as
follows:
‘‘• taking prescription drugs for * * *
obesity, weight control * * *’’.
Two studies indicate that the
stimulant effects of ephedrine increase
when combined with caffeine (Refs. 22
and 23). Caffeine is a nervous system
stimulant that can induce nervousness,
insomnia, and tachycardia (rapid heart
rate) (Refs. 24, 25, and 26). FDA is
concerned that taking caffeine and
ephedrine at the same time may
increase sympathetic stimulation of the
cardiovascular system and nervous
system, e.g., increased heart rate,
insomnia, and nervousness. In the
Federal Register of September 27, 2001
(66 FR 49276), FDA issued a final rule
establishing that any oral OTC
bronchodilator active ingredient in
combination with certain
pharmacological drug categories,
including any stimulant active
ingredient, is not generally recognized
as safe and effective and is misbranded
for OTC use. FDA stated that it did not
believe that any such combination drug
products are currently marketed OTC.
Although OTC bronchodilator drug
products containing ephedrine
ingredients in combination with
caffeine are not allowed and are not
currently marketed, current labeling of
OTC ephedrine drug products does not
contain a warning about the concurrent
use of products containing caffeine or
other ingredients that may have a
stimulant effect. FDA considers it
essential to warn consumers of the risk
of excessive use of ephedrine and
epinephrine ingredients from any
source or use in combination with other
products that have stimulant effects.
These products include other
sympathomimetic drugs, foods or
beverages containing caffeine, and
dietary supplements containing
ingredients reported or claimed to have
a stimulant effect.
In this proposed rule, FDA is
proposing to add the following warnings
to the FM to address concurrent use of
different stimulant products:
• Under the subheading ‘‘Ask a doctor
or pharmacist before use if you are’’, the
statement ‘‘taking any drug that contains
phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine,
ephedrine, or caffeine (such as for
allergy, cough-cold, or pain)’’.
• Under the subheading ‘‘When using
this product’’, the statements ‘‘avoid
caffeine-containing foods or beverages’’
and ‘‘avoid dietary supplements
containing ingredients reported or
claimed to have a stimulant effect’’.
h. Other additional warnings. The FM
for OTC bronchodilator drug products
contains seven active ingredients (see
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
section I.B of this document). FDA
believes that additional warnings are
necessary to inform mild asthmatics of
the need to carefully follow the
warnings and directions for OTC
bronchodilator drug products
containing any of these active
ingredients. FDA is also concerned that
possible serious consequences could
develop from excessive use of OTC
bronchodilator drug products, or
continued use of these products by an
asthmatic who needs professional
medical attention. Therefore, in this
proposed rule, FDA is including
additional warnings in § 341.76 for OTC
bronchodilator drug products.
FDA considers it necessary to inform
mild asthmatics that asthma, if not
treated appropriately, can worsen and
be life-threatening. To emphasize this
concern in this proposed rule, FDA is
including the following ‘‘Asthma alert’’
warning in § 341.76(c)(5)(i) for
ephedrine products:
Asthma alert: Because asthma can be
life threatening, see a doctor if you [in
bold type]:
• are not better in 60 minutes
• get worse
• need [insert total number of dosage
units that equals 150 milligrams] in any
day
• use more than [insert total number of
dosage units that equals 100 milligrams]
a day for more than 3 days a week
• have more than 2 asthma attacks in
a week
In this proposed rule, FDA is
including the following similar
‘‘Asthma alert’’ warning in
§ 341.76(c)(6)(i) for epinephrine
products for use in a hand-held rubber
bulb nebulizer, which states:
Asthma alert: Because asthma can be
life threatening, see a doctor if you [in
bold type]
• are not better in 20 minutes
• get worse
• need 12 inhalations in any day
• use more than 9 inhalations a day for
more than 3 days a week
• have more than 2 asthma attacks in
a week
i. New labeling format. In order to
make OTC drug product labeling easier
to read and understand, and to help
ensure the safe and effective use of all
OTC drug products, FDA is revising the
current labeling in the OTC
bronchodilator FM to conform to the
standardized OTC drug product labeling
format in § 201.66. This labeling format
is included in this proposed rule and
requires the use of specific language in
the labeling of OTC bronchodilator drug
products.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
3. Directions
FDA is proposing to revise the
directions in § 341.76(d)(1) and (d)(2) to
include the statement ‘‘do not exceed
dosage’’ [in bold type] as the first
bulleted statement under the heading
‘‘Directions’’. This revision is intended
to more prominently inform users of
these products not to exceed the
recommended dosage.
D. Related FDA Regulatory Actions
FDA has exercised its authority under
the act to take regulatory action against
OTC bronchodilator drug products
containing ephedrine ingredients being
marketed directly or indirectly for
unapproved uses (e.g., stimulant, weight
control, and athletic performance
enhancement) via a product name that
suggested one of these uses. Since the
1995 proposal, FDA issued warning
letters to companies whose products
have been linked to significant adverse
reactions.
One letter was for a product that
contained ephedrine and another
ingredient (an expectorant) (Ref. 27).
FDA noted that the ‘‘statement of
identity’’ and ‘‘indications’’ portion of
the product label state the correct uses.
However, the trade name of this product
suggested it was intended to aid in
weight loss, an unapproved use for
these ingredients. FDA stated its belief
that because there are serious health
risks inherent in the promotion of
ephedrine for weight loss, the trade
name of the product must be changed in
order to ensure that the product is not
promoted for the unacceptable weight
loss use.
FDA stated in another letter that the
product’s trade name suggests it is
intended for stimulant and recreational
use (Ref. 28). FDA had received reports
of adverse reactions linked to the use of
this product as a stimulant.
FDA requested that these
manufacturers take action immediately
to correct these violations and stated
that failure to do so may result in
regulatory action (e.g., seizure and/or
injunction). In response to these
warning letters, the manufacturers
agreed to revise their ephedrinecontaining drug product trade names
(Refs. 29 and 30).
E. Related DEA Regulatory Actions
In the Federal Register of October 11,
1994 (59 FR 51365), DEA issued a final
rule eliminating the threshold for singleentity ephedrine drug products. The
threshold is an amount of a listed
chemical that determines if a
transaction such as receipt or sale of the
chemical is a regulated transaction
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40245
under 21 CFR part 1310. The final rule
subjected all transactions involving bulk
ephedrine and single-entity ephedrine
drug products, regardless of size, to the
requirements for regulated transactions
for listed chemicals under the
applicable provisions of the Controlled
Substances Act (see 21 U.S.C.
802(39)(A)), which includes
recordkeeping, reporting, and
notification.
DEA regulations require that in retail
settings open to the public where singleentity ephedrine products are sold, such
drugs must be stocked behind a counter
where only employees have access (21
CFR 1309.71(a)(2)). In addition, each
person who sells these products must
identify the other party to the
transaction by having the other party
present documents that would verify the
identity (i.e., a driver’s license and one
other form of identification) and address
of the other party (21 CFR 1310.06 and
1310.07(d)). The required recordkeeping
includes the date of the transaction,
quantity, form of packaging of the
ephedrine product, method of transfer
(company truck, picked up by customer,
etc.), and type of identification used by
the purchaser to the regulated person at
the time the order is placed (21 CFR
1310.06).
IV. FDA’s Tentative Conclusions
A. Summary of Major Labeling Changes
Over the past 28 years since the Panel
report was published, updated
guidelines for the treatment of asthma
have been issued, e.g., ‘‘Guidelines for
the Diagnosis and Management of
Asthma’’ (Ref. 5). The benefits of
bronchodilator drug products
containing ephedrine or epinephrine as
a treatment for mild bronchospasms
continue to outweigh their risks. FDA
recognizes that some people with
asthma have used such products
intermittently for many years and obtain
a benefit from continued availability.
FDA is proposing to update the labeling
for these products to provide for safer
and more effective use. Based on the
available evidence, FDA is proposing to
amend the FM for OTC bronchodilator
drug products to make the changes set
forth in the following paragraphs
(sections IV.A.1 through IV.A.3 of this
document).
1. Indications
FDA is proposing to revise the
indications in § 341.76(b)(1) and (b)(2)
to a single indication in the new OTC
drug labeling format.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
40246
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
2. Warnings
FDA is proposing to revise the entire
warnings section as follows:
• Add an ‘‘Asthma alert’’ section that
lists four conditions in which the user
of the product should see a doctor. This
‘‘Asthma alert’’ shall appear as the first
statement under the heading
‘‘Warnings’’ and parts of the alert shall
be in bold type. This new warning
replaces the warning previously found
in § 341.76(c)(5)(i) for ephedrine
ingredients and in § 341.76(c)(6)(ii) for
epinephrine ingredients.
• List a number of statements that
follow the subheading ‘‘Do not use.’’
These statements include the warnings
previously found in § 341.76(c)(1),
(c)(4), and (c)(6)(iii), where applicable,
for products intended for use in a handheld rubber bulb nebulizer.
• List a number of conditions for
which consumers should consult a
doctor before using these products
under the subheading ‘‘Ask a doctor
before use if you have.’’ This list
includes the conditions previously
stated in § 341.76(c)(2), plus several
additional conditions.
• List a number of other drugs that
people might also be taking at the same
time and thus should consult a doctor
before using the OTC bronchodilator
drug product. This information appears
under the subheading ‘‘Ask a doctor or
pharmacist before use if you are.’’ This
list includes prescription drugs for
asthma previously stated in
§ 341.76(c)(3) plus a new list of other
drugs that could cause side effects when
used in conjunction with ephedrine or
epinephrine ingredients.
• List certain information that
consumers need to know under the
heading ‘‘When using this product.’’
This information includes the following:
» Side effects that may occur
(including side effects currently
listed in § 341.76(c)(5)(ii)),
» Information about problems that
may occur if the drug is taken more
frequently or at a higher than
recommended dosage (currently in
§ 341.76(c)(6)(i) for products
containing epinephrine ingredients,
and which FDA is now proposing to
include for both products
containing ephedrine or
epinephrine ingredients), and
» New information about avoiding
certain foods and dietary
supplements while using an OTC
bronchodilator drug product.
FDA considers the new information
about the risks associated with an
increase in blood pressure and heart rate
to be the most important of this
information and that consumers’
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
attention should be specifically directed
to this information. Accordingly, FDA is
proposing that this information appear
in bold type as the first statement in this
section.
3. Directions
FDA is proposing to revise the
directions in § 341.76(d)(1) and (d)(2) to
include the statement ‘‘do not exceed
dosage’’ [in bold type] as the first
bulleted statement under the heading
‘‘Directions’’.
B. Statement About Warnings
Mandating warnings in an OTC drug
monograph does not require a finding
that any or all of the OTC drug products
covered by the monograph actually
caused an adverse event, and FDA does
not so find. Nor does FDA’s requirement
of warnings repudiate the prior OTC
drug monographs and monograph
rulemakings under which the affected
drug products have been lawfully
marketed. Rather, as a consumer
protection agency, FDA has determined
that warnings are necessary to ensure
that these OTC drug products continue
to be safe and effective for their labeled
indications under ordinary conditions
of use as those terms are defined in the
act. This judgment balances the benefits
of these drug products against their
potential risks (see § 330.10(a)).
FDA’s decision to act in this instance
need not meet the standard of proof
required to prevail in a private tort
action (Glastetter v. Novartis
Pharmaceuticals, Corp., 252 F.3d 986,
991 (8th Cir. 2001)). To mandate
warnings, or take similar regulatory
action, FDA need not show, nor do we
allege, actual causation. For an
expanded discussion of case law
supporting FDA’s authority to require
such warnings, see the final rule on
Labeling of DiphenhydramineContaining Drug Products for Over-theCounter Human Use (67 FR 72555,
December 6, 2002).
V. Proposed Implementation
FDA proposes that the requirements
of a final rule based on this proposed
rule be effective within 6 months after
publication in the Federal Register to
provide for safe and effective use of
OTC bronchodilator drug products at
the earliest possible time because of the
safety issues involved with the use of
OTC bronchodilator drug products.
Therefore, on or after 6 months after the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of a final rule based on this
proposed rule, any OTC bronchodilator
drug product that is subject to the final
rule and that contains nonmonograph
labeling or packaging may not be
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
initially introduced or initially
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce unless it is the subject of an
approved application. Any OTC
bronchodilator drug product that is
initially introduced or initially
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce after the effective date of a
final rule, and is not in compliance with
the regulations, is subject to regulatory
action. Further, any OTC drug product
that was previously initially introduced
or initially delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce cannot be
repackaged or relabeled with the prior
monograph labeling for these products
after the effective date of a final rule
based on this proposed rule.
Manufacturers are encouraged to
comply voluntarily with this proposed
rule at the earliest possible date.
VI. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). Under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, if a rule has
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, an
agency must analyze regulatory options
that would minimize any significant
impact of the rule on small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $115
million, using the most current (2003)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
FDA believes that this proposed rule
is consistent with the principles set out
in Executive Order 12866 and in these
two statutes. OMB has determined this
rule is a significant regulatory action
under the Executive order. The purpose
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
of this proposed rule is to revise and
improve the labeling (add additional
warning statements, change the
directions, and change the format for the
indications) for OTC bronchodilator
drug products. The revised labeling is
intended to provide consumers more
and better information to help ensure
the safe and effective use of all OTC
bronchodilator drug products that
contain these ingredients. This
proposed rule amends the FM for OTC
bronchodilator drug products and
requires relabeling of all products
covered by the FM. Potential benefits
include safer use of these products by
consumers.
FDA’s Drug Listing System (DLS)
identifies approximately 25
manufacturers/distributors of
approximately 40 to 50 OTC
bronchodilator drug products.
Approximately half of the
manufacturers/distributors market
single-ingredient ephedrine drug
products, and the other half market
combination ephedrine/guaifenesin
drug products. There appears to be a
very limited number of manufacturers/
distributors marketing OTC epinephrine
solution products. There may be some
additional marketers and combination
products sold via magazines and the
Internet, which are not in the DLS.
A. Relabeling Costs
FDA believes that the proposed
relabeling costs of the type set forth in
this document generally average about
$3,000 to $4,000 per stock keeping unit
(SKU) (individual products, packages,
and sizes). Assuming that there are
about 50 affected OTC drug products in
the marketplace, total one-time costs of
relabeling would be $150,000 ($3,000
per SKU x 50 SKUs) to $200,000 ($4,000
per SKU x 50 SKUs). Even if there are
20 additional products that FDA is not
aware of, total one-time costs of
relabeling should not exceed $280,000
($4,000 per SKU x 70 SKUs). FDA
believes that actual costs would be
lower for several reasons. First, it is
FDA’s understanding that most of the
label changes will be made by private
label manufacturers that tend to use
relatively simple and less expensive
labeling. Second, FDA has revised the
labeling format in this proposed rule
based on the OTC drug product labeling
format in § 201.66. Therefore,
manufacturers will not incur expenses
determining how to state the new
information in product labeling.
Manufacturers, however, may incur
some expense to redesign product
labeling.
Most of the manufacturers who
produce affected products are small
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
entities, using the U.S. Small Business
Administration designations for this
industry (750 employees). FDA believes
that any other unidentified
manufacturer of these products is also a
small entity. Those manufacturers who
must relabel a large number of their
products or manufacture a new smaller
size package will incur the greatest
economic impact.
B. Regulatory Alternatives Considered
Although FDA has rejected this
alternative, FDA had proposed in 1995
to amend the FM for OTC
bronchodilator drug products to remove
the ingredients ephedrine, ephedrine
hydrochloride, ephedrine sulfate, and
racephedrine hydrochloride and to
classify those ingredients as not
generally recognized as safe and
effective for OTC use. In this proposed
rulemaking, FDA considered but
rejected several other labeling and
packaging alternatives: (1) A longer
implementation period, (2) an
exemption from coverage for small
entities, and (3) less labeling
information. FDA does not consider
these alternatives acceptable because
they do not assure that consumers will
have the most recent needed
information for safe and effective use of
these OTC bronchodilator drug products
in a timely manner.
This proposed rule does not require
any new reporting and recordkeeping
activities. Therefore, no additional
professional skills are needed.
There is one other Federal rule that
overlaps, but does not conflict with, this
proposed rule. DEA regulations
(discussed in section III.E of this
document) control the distribution of
single-entity OTC ephedrine drug
products.
This analysis shows that this
proposed rule is not economically
significant under Executive Order 12866
and that FDA has analyzed regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. Nevertheless, some
small entities, especially those private
label manufacturers that provide a
number of the affected products, may
incur significant impacts. Thus, this
economic analysis, together with other
relevant sections of this document,
serves as FDA’s initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, as required under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that the
labeling requirements proposed in this
document are not subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
because they do not constitute a
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40247
‘‘collection of information’’ under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Rather, the
proposed labeling statements are a
‘‘public disclosure of information
originally supplied by the Federal
government to the recipient for the
purpose of disclosure to the public’’ (5
CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
VIII. Environmental Impact
FDA has determined under 21 CFR
25.31(a) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
IX. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA
has determined that the proposed rule
does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, FDA
tentatively concludes that the proposed
rule does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
has not been prepared.
X. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this proposed rule
and the agency’s economic impact
determination. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or three paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document and may be accompanied by
a supporting memorandum or brief.
Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
XI. Proposed Effective Date
FDA is proposing that any final rule
that may issue based on this proposed
rule be effective 6 months after its date
of publication in the Federal Register.
XII. References
The following references are on
display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) under
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
40248
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Docket No. 1995N–0205, unless
otherwise indicated, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. Goodman & Gilman’s The
Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics, 10th
ed., edited by J.G. Hardman and L.E. Limbird,
McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY, p. 237,
2001.
2. Chua, S.S. and S.I. Benrimoj, ‘‘NonPrescription Sympathomimetic Agents and
Hypertension,’’ Medical Toxicology, 3:387–
417, 1988.
3. Morgan, P., ‘‘The Role of Vasopressors
in the Management of Hypotension Induced
by Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia,’’
Canadian Journal of Anesthesiology, 41(5 Pt
1):404–413, 1994.
4. Boozer, C.N. et al., ‘‘Herbal Ephedra/
Caffeine for Weight Loss; A 6-Month
Randomized Safety and Efficacy Trial,’’
International Journal of Obesity and Related
Metabolic Disorders, 26:593–604, 2002.
5. ‘‘Guidelines for the Diagnosis and
Management of Asthma. National Asthma
Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP)
Expert Panel Report,’’ National Institutes of
Health Publication, Update on Selected
Topics 2002, pp. 3–125, 2002.
6. Naureckas, E.T., and J. Solway, ‘‘Mild
Asthma,’’ The New England Journal of
Medicine, 345(17):1257–1262, 2002.
7. The United States Pharmacopeia 28/The
National Formulary 23, United States
Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., Rockville,
MD, p. 736, 2004.
8. Hoffman, B.B., ‘‘Catecholamines,
Sympathomimetic Drugs, and Adrenergic
Receptor Antagonists,’’ Goodman & Gilman’s
The Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics,
10th ed., edited by J.G. Hardman and L.E.
Limbird, McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY,
pp. 215–220, 2001.
9. ‘‘Final Report of The Hemorrhagic
Stroke Project,’’ Comment No. C230, Docket
No. 1976N–0052N.
10. Memorandum from Division of Drug
Risk Assessment I to Division of OTC Drug
Products, dated October 31, 2000.
11. Goodman & Gilman’s The
Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics, 10th
ed., edited by J.G. Hardman and L.E. Limbird,
McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY, pp. 215–
241, 2001.
12. ‘‘Ephedrine (hydrochloride),’’
Therapeutic Drugs, edited by C. Dollery,
Churchill Livingston, New York, NY, pp. 26–
29, 1991.
13. Goodman & Gilman’s The
Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics, 10th
ed., edited by J.G. Hardman and L.E. Limbird,
McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY, pp. 193–
253, 2001.
14. Chen, K.K. and C.F. Schmidt,
‘‘Ephedrine and Related Substances,’’
Medicine, 9:1–117, 1930.
15. Clark, J.E. and W.A. Simon, ‘‘Cardiac
Arrhythmias After Phenylpropanolamine
Ingestion,’’ Drug Intelligence and Clinical
Pharmacy, 17:737–738, 1983.
16. Bernstein, E. and B.M. Diskant,
‘‘Phenylpropanolamine: A Potentially
Hazardous Drug,’’ Annals of Emergency
Medicine, 11:311–315, 1982.
17. Mueller, M. and E.B. Solow, ‘‘Seizures
Associated with a New Combination Pick-
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
me-up Pill [Letter],’’ Annals of Neurology,
11:322, 1982.
18. Koby, M., ‘‘Disease and Disorders,’’
Ferri’s Clinical Advisor, edited by F.F. Ferri
et al., published by W.B. Saunders, section 1,
2003.
19. Goodman & Gilman’s The
Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics, 10th
ed., edited by J.G. Hardman and L.E. Limbird,
McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY, pp. 1821–
1848, 2001.
20. Hari, C.K. et al., ‘‘Acute Angle Closure
Glaucoma Precipitated by Intranasal
Application of Cocaine,’’ Journal of
Laryngology Otology, 113(3):250–251, 1999.
21. Sneddon, J.M. and P. Turner,
‘‘Ephedrine Mydriasis in Hypertension and
the Response to Treatment,’’ Clinical
Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 10(1):64–
71, 1969.
22. Astrup, A. et al, ‘‘The Effect of Safety
of an Ephedrine/Caffeine Compound
Compared to Ephedrine, Caffeine, and
Placebo in Obese Subjects on an Energy
Restricted Diet. A Double Blind Trial,’’
International Journal of Obesity, 16:269–277,
1992.
23. Toubro, S. et al., ‘‘Safety and Efficacy
of Long-term Treatment with Ephedrine,
Caffeine, and an Ephedrine/Caffeine
Mixture,’’ International Journal of Obesity,
17(1):S69–S72, 1993.
24. Karch, S.B., ‘‘Other Naturally Occurring
Stimulants,’’ The Pathology of Drug Abuse,
edited by S.B. Karch, CRC Press, Boca Raton,
FL, pp. 177–198, 1996.
25. ‘‘Analeptics: Caffeine,’’ Drug
Interaction Facts and Comparison, pp. 230–
230b, 1996.
26. ‘‘Caffeine,’’ Therapeutic Drugs, edited
by C. Dollery, Churchill Livingston, New
York, NY, pp. 3–6, 1991.
27. Letter from B.W. Williams, FDA, to R.
Deer, BDI Pharmaceuticals, Division of Body
Dynamics, Inc., dated February 24, 1997,
coded LET3.
28. Letter from B.W. Williams, FDA, to M.
Krassnof, PDK Labs, Inc., dated February 24,
1997, coded LET2.
29. Letter from S. Shapiro, counsel to BDI
Pharmaceuticals, to R. Eshelman, FDA, dated
March 14, 1997, in OTC Vol. 04BPEA2.
30. Letter from R. Spinello, PDK Labs Inc.,
to R. Eshelman, FDA, dated March 14, 1997,
in OTC Vol. 04BPEA2.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 341
Labeling, Over-the-counter drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
21 CFR part 341 be amended as follows:
PART 341—COLD, COUGH, ALLERGY,
BRONCHODILATOR, AND
ANTIASTHMATIC DRUG PRODUCTS
FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN
USE
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 341 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 353,
355, 360, 371.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Section 341.76 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) to
read as follows:
§ 341.76 Labeling of bronchodilator drug
products.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Indication. The labeling of the
product states the following under the
heading ‘‘Use’’: ‘‘for temporary relief of
occasional symptoms of mild asthma:
[bullet]1 wheezing [bullet] tightness of
chest [bullet] shortness of breath’’. Other
truthful and nonmisleading statements,
describing only the indication for use
that has been established and listed in
this paragraph, may also be used as
provided in § 330.1(c)(2) of this chapter,
subject to the provisions of section 502
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) relating to misbranding and
the prohibition in section 301(d) of the
act against the introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate
commerce of unapproved new drugs in
violation of section 505(a) of the act.
(c) Warnings. The labeling of the
product contains the following warnings
under the heading ‘‘Warnings’’:
(1) The following statements shall
appear after the subheading ‘‘Do not
use’’ [in bold type]:
(i) ‘‘[Bullet] unless a doctor said you
have asthma’’.
(ii) ‘‘[Bullet] if you are now taking a
prescription monoamine oxidase
inhibitor (MAOI) (certain drugs taken
for depression, psychiatric or emotional
conditions, or Parkinson’s disease), or
for 2 weeks after stopping the MAOI
drug. If you do not know if your
prescription drug contains an MAOI,
ask a doctor or pharmacist before taking
this product.’’
(2) The following information shall
appear after the subheading ‘‘Ask a
doctor before use if you have’’ [in bold
type] ‘‘[bullet] ever been hospitalized for
asthma [bullet] heart disease [bullet]
high blood pressure [bullet] diabetes
[bullet] thyroid disease [bullet] seizures
[bullet] narrow angle glaucoma [bullet]
a psychiatric or emotional condition
[bullet] trouble urinating due to an
enlarged prostate gland’’.
(3) The following information shall
appear after the subheading ‘‘Ask a
doctor or pharmacist before use if you
are’’ [in bold type]:
(i) ‘‘[Bullet] taking prescription drugs
for asthma, obesity, weight control,
depression, or psychiatric or emotional
conditions’’.
(ii) ‘‘[Bullet] taking any drug that
contains phenylephrine,
pseudoephedrine, ephedrine, or caffeine
1 See § 201.66(b)(4) of this chapter for the
definition of ‘‘bullet.’’
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(such as for allergy, cough-cold, or
pain)’’.
(4) The following information shall
appear after the subheading ‘‘When
using this product’’ [in bold type]:
(i) ‘‘[Bullet] increased blood pressure
or heart rate can occur, which could
lead to more serious problems such as
heart attack, stroke, and death. Your risk
may increase if you take more
frequently or more than the
recommended dose.’’ [statements shall
appear in bold type as the first
statements under this subheading]
(ii) ‘‘[Bullet] nervousness,
sleeplessness, rapid heart beat, tremor,
and seizure may occur. If these
symptoms persist or get worse, consult
a doctor right away.’’
(iii) ‘‘[Bullet] avoid caffeinecontaining foods or beverages’’.
(iv) ‘‘[Bullet] avoid dietary
supplements containing ingredients
reported or claimed to have a stimulant
effect’’.
(5) For products containing
ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride,
ephedrine sulfate, or racephedrine
hydrochloride identified in § 341.16(a),
(b), (c), and (f).—(i) The following
information shall appear after the
subheading ‘‘Asthma alert: Because
asthma can be life threatening, see a
doctor if you’’ [in bold type]:
(A) ‘‘[Bullet] are not better in 60
minutes’’.
(B) ‘‘[Bullet] get worse’’.
(C) ‘‘[Bullet] need [insert total number
of dosage units that equals 150
milligrams] in any day’’.
(D) ‘‘[Bullet] use more than [insert
total number of dosage units that equals
100 milligrams] a day for more than 3
days a week’’.
(E) ‘‘[Bullet] have more than 2 asthma
attacks in a week.’’
(ii) This ‘‘Asthma alert’’ shall appear
on any labeling that contains warnings
and shall be the first warning statement
under the heading ‘‘Warnings’’.
(6) For products containing
epinephrine, epinephrine bitartrate, or
racepinephrine hydrochloride identified
in § 341.16(d), (e), and (g).—(i) The
following information shall appear after
the subheading ‘‘Asthma alert: Because
asthma can be life threatening, see a
doctor if you’’ [in bold type]:
(A) ‘‘[Bullet] are not better in 20
minutes’’.
(B) ‘‘[Bullet] get worse’’.
(C) ‘‘[Bullet] need 12 inhalations in
any day’’.
(D) ‘‘[Bullet] use more than 9
inhalations a day for more than 3 days
a week’’.
(E) ‘‘[Bullet] have more than 2 asthma
attacks in a week.’’
(ii) This ‘‘Asthma alert’’ shall appear
on any labeling that contains warnings
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:35 Jul 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
and shall be the first warning statement
under the heading ‘‘Warnings’’.
(iii) For products intended for use in
a hand-held rubber bulb nebulizer. The
following statement shall also appear
after the subheading ‘‘Do not use’’ along
with the other information in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section: ‘‘[bullet] if product
is brown in color or cloudy’’.
(d) Directions. The labeling of the
product contains the following
information under the heading
‘‘Directions’’:
(1) For products containing
ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride,
ephedrine sulfate, or racephedrine
hydrochloride identified in § 341.16(a),
(b), (c), and (f).—(i) ‘‘[Bullet] do not
exceed dosage’’ [sentence appears as
first bulleted statement under
‘‘Directions’’ and in bold type].
(ii) ‘‘[Bullet] adults and children 12
years of age and over: oral dose is 12.5
to 25 milligrams every 4 hours as
needed, not to exceed 150 milligrams in
24 hours’’.
(iii) ‘‘[Bullet] children under 12 years
of age: ask a doctor’’.
(2) For products containing
epinephrine, epinephrine bitartrate, and
racepinephrine hydrochloride identified
in § 341.16(d), (e), and (g) for use in a
hand-held rubber bulb nebulizer. The
ingredient is used in an aqueous
solution at a concentration equivalent to
1 percent epinephrine.
(i) ‘‘[Bullet] do not exceed dosage’’
[appears as first bulleted statement
under ‘‘Directions’’ and in bold type].
(ii) ‘‘[Bullet] adults and children 4
years of age and over: 1 to 3 inhalations
not more often than every 3 hours. The
use of this product by children should
be supervised by an adult.’’
(iii) ‘‘[Bullet] children under 4 years
of age: ask a doctor’’.
Dated: June 30, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–13709 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR 285
[0790–ZA05]
DoD Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) Program (DoDD 5400.7)
Department of Defense.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule conforms
to the requirements of the Electronic
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40249
Freedom of Information Act
Amendments of 1996. It promotes
public trust by making the maximum
amount of information available to the
public, in both hard copy and electronic
formats, on the operation and activities
of the Department of Defense, consistent
with DoD responsibility to protect
national security and other DoD
interests as provided by applicable law.
It also allows a requester to obtain
Agency records from the Department of
Defense that are available through other
public information services without
invoking the FOIA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
September 12, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David W. Maier, 703–695–6428
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This proposed regulatory action is not
a significant regulatory action, as
defined by Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5
U.S.C. 605(b))
This proposed regulatory action will
not have a significant adverse impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 (Sec.
202, Pub. L. 104–4)
This proposed regulatory action does
not contain a Federal mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in aggregate, or
by the private sector of $100 million or
more in any one year.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This proposed regulatory action will
not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
This proposed regulatory action does
not have Federalism implications, as set
forth in Executive Order 13132. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been certified that this rule is
not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not,
if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule
implements the Freedom of Information
Act (5 U.S.C. 552), a statute concerning
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40237-40249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 341
[Docket No. 1995N-0205] (formerly Docket No. 95N-0205)
RIN 0910-AF32
Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug
Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amendment of
Monograph for Over-the-Counter Bronchodilator Drug Products
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal of previous proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend
the final monograph (FM) for over-the-counter (OTC) bronchodilator drug
products to add additional warnings (e.g., an ``Asthma alert'') and to
revise the indications, warnings, and directions in the labeling of
products containing the ingredients ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride,
ephedrine
[[Page 40238]]
sulfate, epinephrine, epinephrine bitartrate, racephedrine
hydrochloride, and racepinephrine hydrochloride. This proposed rule is
part of FDA's ongoing review of OTC drug products. FDA is also
withdrawing the proposed rule (see the Federal Register of July 27,
1995 (60 FR 38643)) to remove the ephedrine ingredients from the FM.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the proposed monograph
amendment and on FDA's economic impact determinations by November 10,
2005. The date of withdrawal of the July 27, 1995, proposed rule is
July 13, 2005. Please see section XI of this document for the proposed
effective date of any final rule that may publish based on this
proposal.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 1995N-0205
and/or RIN number 0910-AF32, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Follow instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site.
E-mail: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov. Include Docket No. 1995N-
0205 and/or RIN number 0910-AF32 in the subject line of your e-mail
message.
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket No. or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this
document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to
the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cazemiro R. Martin or Gerald M.
Rachanow, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-560), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-
2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)
B. Tentative Final Monograph (TFM) and FM
C. Proposal to Remove Ephedrine Ingredients From the OTC
Bronchodilator FM
II. Comments Received in Response to the 1995 Proposal to Remove
Ephedrine Ingredients From the OTC Bronchodilator FM
A. Number of Comments Received
B. Summary of Comments Received
III. FDA's Response to the Comments
A. Asthma and Its Treatment With Ephedrine
B. Benefit-Risk Assessment
C. Labeling for OTC Bronchodilator Drug Products
D. Related FDA Regulatory Actions
E. Related DEA Regulatory Actions
IV. FDA's Tentative Conclusions
A. Summary of Major Labeling Changes
B. Statement About Warnings
V. Proposed Implementation
VI. Analysis of Impacts
A. Relabeling Costs
B. Regulatory Alternatives Considered
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VIII. Environmental Impact
IX. Federalism
X. Request for Comments
XI. Proposed Effective Date
XII. References
I. Background
A. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)
In the Federal Register of September 9, 1976 (41 FR 38312), FDA
published, under Sec. 330.10(a)(6) (21 CFR 330.10(a)(6)), an ANPRM to
establish a monograph for OTC cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and
antiasthmatic drug products, together with the recommendations of the
Advisory Review Panel on OTC Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and
Antiasthmatic Drug Products (the Panel), which was the advisory review
panel responsible for evaluating data on the active ingredients in this
drug class. The Panel recommended that ephedrine and epinephrine
preparations be category I (generally recognized as safe and effective)
for OTC bronchodilator use (41 FR 38312 at 38370 through 38372).
B. Tentative Final Monograph (TFM) and FM
FDA concurred with the Panel in the bronchodilator TFM (47 FR 47520
at 47527, October 26, 1982). FDA included the following active
ingredients in the FM for OTC bronchodilator drug products: Ephedrine
ingredients (ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride, ephedrine sulfate, and
racephedrine hydrochloride) and epinephrine ingredients (epinephrine,
epinephrine bitartrate, and racepinephrine hydrochloride) (51 FR 35326
at 35339, October 2, 1986). In this current proposed rule, the term
``ephedrine ingredients'' includes the four active ingredients included
in the FM; the term ``epinephrine ingredients'' includes the three
active ingredients included in the FM; and the term ``OTC
bronchodilator drug products'' includes products containing any of
these seven active ingredients.
C. Proposal to Remove Ephedrine Ingredients From the OTC Bronchodilator
FM
In the Federal Register of July 27, 1995 (60 FR 38643), FDA
published a proposed rule (the 1995 proposal) to amend the FM for OTC
bronchodilator drug products. It proposed to remove the ephedrine
ingredients (ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride, ephedrine sulfate, and
racephedrine hydrochloride) and to classify those ingredients as not
generally recognized as safe and effective for OTC use. At that time,
FDA reassessed the benefit/risk of OTC ephedrine drug products and
proposed their removal because of safety concerns, including the
potential for these products to cause harm as a result of misuse and
abuse. Interested persons were invited to submit written comments or
objections to the 1995 proposal and FDA's economic impact determination
by August 28, 1995.
II. Comments Received in Response to the 1995 Proposal to Remove
Ephedrine Ingredients From the OTC Bronchodilator FM
A. Number of Comments Received
FDA received comments from 56 consumers, 37 health professionals, 8
manufacturers of OTC bronchodilator drug products, 5 Federal and State
government agencies, 5 national associations, 4 boards of pharmacy, 2
distributors of dietary supplements, 1 consulting firm, and 1 member of
Congress. Several comments addressed FDA's economic impact
determination. Copies of the comments and additional information that
have come to FDA's attention since publication of the 1995
[[Page 40239]]
proposal are on public display in the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES).
B. Summary of Comments Received
(Comment 1) Several comments contended that the 1995 proposal does
not indicate whether FDA had analyzed whether additional labeling
warnings (including restrictions on distribution) would address FDA's
concerns about safer OTC use of ephedrine drug products, especially by
young people. The comments stated that FDA should use its authority to
amend current product labeling warnings required by the FM for OTC
bronchodilator drug products.
(Comment 2) The comments suggested a number of reasons for the
potential unsafe use of OTC ephedrine drug products:
Virtually all of the unsafe use is related to products
with brand names that promote the unapproved pharmacological effects of
ephedrine.
Although these products are labeled with the required FDA
bronchodilator labeling, they are promoted in the marketplace as
stimulants, weight loss products, and performance enhancers.
These products are readily available for sale in
convenience stores, service stations, and truck stops or by magazine
mail order.
Little or no restrictions exist on the sale of these
products to teenagers and children.
FDA and the Federal Trade Commission have not utilized
their enforcement authority to address the safety problems associated
with improper promotion of these products, which is the main problem.
(Comment 3) Several comments made suggestions concerning OTC sales
of these products. These included the following recommendations:
Proof of age should be required to reduce purchase of
these products by children.
Ephedrine and its salts should be placed under schedule V
of the Controlled Substances Act to control sales, while allowing
people who have a legitimate medical need for the products to purchase
them.
States could restrict OTC sale of ephedrine drug products.
(Comment 4) Many comments supported FDA's proposal to remove
ephedrine active ingredients from the OTC marketplace. In addition,
these comments presented the following arguments against the sale of
all OTC bronchodilator drug products:
Easy access leads to self diagnosis, results in the delay
of treatment, and may mask other symptoms.
People who use OTC bronchodilators do not receive patient
education about their disease, about the medication, or about the
product's possible side effects on the heart and central nervous
system.
OTC availability allows the products to be sold to
individuals of any age and implies that mild asthma is not serious,
despite the fact that people with mild asthma can die from the disease.
People can make deadly mistakes if they do not use these
products properly.
People do not, or cannot, read the product's warnings and
do not always understand or heed what they read.
Parents often use these products for their small children,
even though interaction with a pediatrician is necessary for treating a
child's asthma.
OTC bronchodilators are often used for unintended
purposes.
(Comment 5) Several comments cited a number of problems occurring
in their States as a result of the unrestricted availability of OTC
ephedrine drug products. These included the use of higher than the
labeled doses, prolonged use of products, use for unapproved
indications (e.g., for weight loss and as a stimulant), and improper
use, particularly by children.
(Comment 6) A few comments addressed the OTC availability of
epinephrine aerosol dosage forms\1\ and dietary supplements that
contain ephedrine alkaloids or ephedra.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 1995 proposal did not involve epinephrine aerosol dosage
forms. In the Federal Register of May 20, 1996 (61 FR 25142), FDA
amended the bronchodilator drug products FM by removing pressurized
metered-dose aerosol container dosage forms for the ingredients
epinephrine, epinephrine bitartrate, and racepinephrine
hydrochloride. The bronchodilator FM currently includes these three
epinephrine ingredients only for use in a hand-held rubber bulb
nebulizer (21 CFR 341.76(d)(2)). Accordingly, because these
ingredients in pressurized metered-dose aerosol container dosage
forms are not included in this document, FDA is not addressing the
comments on this dosage form.
\2\ The 1995 proposal on OTC bronchodilator drug products did
not involve dietary supplements. FDA has addressed dietary
supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids separately in a final
rule that published on February 11, 2004 (69 FR 6788), under Docket
No. 1995N-0304. The final rule declared dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids adulterated under section
402(f)(1)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act)
(21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(A)) because they present an unreasonable risk
of illness or injury. Accordingly, dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids may no longer be marketed in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. FDA's Response to the Comments
After considering the comments submitted for the 1995 proposal to
remove ephedrine and other active ingredients from the FM, FDA is
withdrawing that proposal. The scope and coverage of this current
proposed rule differ from the 1995 proposal. FDA has given serious
consideration to the various arguments presented by the comments on the
1995 proposal, has considered other information, and has determined
that ephedrine and other bronchodilator ingredients should remain in
the FM for self-treatment of mild bronchial asthma for several reasons:
There are people with diagnosed mild bronchial asthma for
whom the benefits of symptomatic treatment with OTC bronchodilators for
temporary wheezing, shortness of breath, and tightness of chest
outweigh the risks of use.
Additional labeling warnings and directions in this
current proposal provide information to promote safer use of these
products.
FDA has taken regulatory action against ephedrine drug
products with misleading brand names that promoted weight loss,
enhancement of athletic performance, or stimulant uses.
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) requirements
restricting the sale of ephedrine, its salts, optical isomers, and
salts of optical isomers that became effective after FDA published the
1995 proposal are in effect and, among other things, require single-
ingredient ephedrine drug products to be sold behind the counter.
Therefore, access to these products is controlled.
A. Asthma and Its Treatment With Ephedrine
Asthma is a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation of the
airways, resulting in episodes of airway narrowing and obstruction.
Asthma can be serious and should be diagnosed and treated by a
physician. Although there is no cure for asthma, appropriate management
most often leads to control of the condition. FDA notes that the Panel
stated that sympathomimetic drugs (e.g., ephedrine) are used to
overcome the spasm that causes narrowing of the bronchial air tubes,
and the usefulness of ephedrine is limited to the milder forms of
asthma (41 FR 38312 at 38370 through 38371).
In assessing ephedrine, the Panel relied on data from two studies
conducted in 1973 and 1975, respectively. The patient population
enrolled in these studies was not only clinically stable (i.e., normal
electrocardiogram, blood pressure, and pulse), but also had no apparent
history of adverse events related to treatment with other stimulant
bronchodilators used at the time. One study was a double-blind
comparison of 24 milligrams (mg) ephedrine and a combination of 24 mg
of ephedrine and 130 mg theophylline (41 FR 38312 at
[[Page 40240]]
38371). Measurements including specific airway resistance, vital
capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
showed that ephedrine significantly decreased the airway resistance and
increased both capacity and FEV1 over a 2-hour period. This
effect was enhanced and prolonged by the presence of theophylline, a
prescription drug. The Panel cited another study comparing ephedrine
and terbutaline (a prescription drug) in 26 asthmatics. The data
indicated that 25 mg ephedrine resulted in significant improvement in
the pulmonary function tests between 120 and 240 minutes after taking a
single dose (41 FR 38312 at 38371). The results were similar to 2.5 mg
terbutaline, but less than the effect of 5 mg terbutaline. These
clinical studies supported improvement in pulmonary function tests
between 2 and 4 hours after taking a single dose of 25 mg ephedrine,
with the improvements lasting up to 4 hours. These studies support the
use of ephedrine for patients with asthma who are otherwise clinically
stable (i.e., not found by a physician to have high blood pressure or
other cardiovascular risk).
Ephedrine is an [agr] and [bgr] adrenergic agonist and also
enhances the release of norepinephrine from sympathetic neurons. In
addition to its bronchodilation effect, other effects of ephedrine are
related to its pharmacodynamic actions through [agr] and [bgr]
adrenergic receptors (Ref. 1). These include awareness of heart beat,
rapid heart beat, and variable increases of blood pressure. The Panel
indicated that a study by Dulfano and Glass on 26 asthmatics between 28
and 61 years old showed that (at measured intervals of 15, 30, 60, 120,
180, and 240 minutes) a single dose of 25 mg ephedrine had no
significant effect on either heart rate or blood pressure (41 FR 38312
at 38370).\3\ The Panel also cited a study by Tashkin and Simmons of
the cardiovascular effects of 25 mg ephedrine (over a 7-hour period) in
20 asthmatics. The Panel noted that there was only a modest increase in
heart rate of up to 11 beats per minute as a maximum, and the systolic
and diastolic blood pressure showed no significant change (41 FR 38312
at 38370).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The authors reported maximal cardiovascular effects at 180
minutes after administration of ephedrine compared to control
(baseline): Heart rate (beats per minute) decreased from 91.6 to
83.1; blood pressure (millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)), systolic
increased from 127.8 to 129.9 and diastolic increased from 81.0 to
82.4.
\4\ The authors reported that after ephedrine, mean heart rate
was significantly higher than control (baseline) values (average 7.4
to 10.9 beats per minute) at 2 to 5 hours as well as mean placebo
values (average 7.7 to 10.6 beats per minute at 2, 4, and 5 hours).
The authors measured blood pressure over a 7-hour period after the
subjects took ephedrine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1988, Chua and Benrimoj reviewed the blood pressure effects of
OTC sympathomimetic drugs, including ephedrine (Ref. 2). They made the
following observations:
McLaurin et al. (1961) and Laitinen et al. (1982) found 25
mg of ephedrine produced no significant effect on blood pressure and
heart rate of normotensive patients.
Tashkin et al. (1975) obtained similar results when
comparing the cardiovascular and bronchial effects of terbutaline with
ephedrine.
Bye et al. (1974) demonstrated a significant rise in
systolic blood pressure of 17 and 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) with
50 and 25 mg of ephedrine, respectively, but no effect on diastolic
blood pressure.
Elis et al. (1967) showed that a single oral dose of 30 mg
ephedrine produced an average increase in mean arterial blood pressure
of 5 mm Hg.
Drew et al. (1978) showed that oral doses of 60 mg
ephedrine produced significant increases in systolic and diastolic
blood pressure in normotensive subjects.
The discrepancy between Bye et al. and McLaurin et al. may
be due to the different parameters analyzed and the time intervals for
blood pressure measurement.
Other information also supports a pressor effect (increases blood
pressure) of ephedrine. Intravenous ephedrine is used to increase blood
pressure in patients with hypotension during spinal and epidural
anesthesia, particularly during obstetrical procedures (Ref. 3).
In the recent final rule on dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids (69 FR 6788, February 11, 2004), FDA discussed the
results from a study by Boozer et al. (Ref. 4). That study evaluated
the blood pressure effects of a combination of ephedrine alkaloids and
caffeine compared to placebo over a 6-month period. Using automated
blood pressure measurements over 24 hours at weeks 1, 2, and 4, the
ephedrine alkaloid and caffeine group had significantly higher blood
pressure measurements after 4 weeks of treatment. The effect reported
in this study cannot be attributed to the caffeine because the effect
of caffeine on blood pressure is transient, and the acute effect of
caffeine to increase blood pressure is lost within 2 weeks of continued
use (69 FR 6788 at 6802). FDA finds that the collective evidence
suggests that ephedrine at doses recommended for a bronchodilator
effect causes elevation of blood pressure. Some individuals who use
ephedrine are at risk of experiencing adverse effects from therapy
because of ephedrine's effect on blood pressure. Despite the results of
the Boozer study and other evidence, FDA considers the therapeutic
benefits of ephedrine as an OTC bronchodilator outweigh its effects in
elevating blood pressure based on its temporary and intermittent use.
(See also section III.B of this document.)
According to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program
guidelines, mild intermittent asthma is defined as having symptoms no
more than twice a week during the day or twice a month at night (Ref.
5). Between asthmatic episodes, these asthmatics have no symptoms and
can maintain a normal level of activity. FDA has determined that people
with mild intermittent asthma are the only category of asthmatics who
should be candidates for oral ephedrine. Asthmatics with more severe
asthma disease (i.e., persistent asthma) should be under the care of a
physician for consideration of additional therapy to control the
disease (Ref. 6).
The Panel noted that wide use of epinephrine aerosols for temporary
relief of milder forms of asthma has been attended by few and mild side
effects. The Panel cited a double-blind study in asthmatics during
which epinephrine aerosol demonstrated a significant increase in
bronchial air flow in 15 minutes accompanied by symptomatic relief,
whereas the placebo gave little change (41 FR 38312 at 38372). The
Panel concluded that epinephrine is a safe and effective OTC
bronchodilator ingredient when used according to recommended labeling,
and FDA included epinephrine in the FM (51 FR 35326 at 35332 through
35333).
B. Benefit-Risk Assessment
FDA has done a benefit-risk assessment of the different uses of
ephedrine ingredients. FDA has determined, based on its review of the
available information, that the benefits of single-dose ephedrine
ingredients for the temporary relief of mild asthma outweigh the risks.
In contrast, FDA determined for dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids that the risks of use outweigh any benefits.
In the Federal Register of February 11, 2004, FDA declared dietary
supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids adulterated under the act
because they present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury based on
a risk-benefit analysis (69 FR 6788 at 6824). After reviewing the
available data on weight loss, enhancement of athletic
[[Page 40241]]
performance, eased breathing in healthy individuals, and other uses,
FDA concluded that the data do not indicate that these dietary
supplement products containing ephedrine alkaloids provide a benefit
sufficient to outweigh the risks. FDA stated that there is sufficient
evidence to conclude that ephedrine alkaloids can increase blood
pressure and heart rate. FDA also stated that dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids ``expose users to several risks,
including the consequences of a sustained increase in blood pressure
(e.g., serious illnesses or injuries that include stroke and heart
attack that can result in death) and increased morbidity and mortality
from worsened heart failure and proarrhythmic effects'' (69 FR 6788 at
6827). FDA also stated that although the proarrhythmic effects of
dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids typically occur only
in susceptible individuals, the long-term risks from elevated blood
pressure can occur even in nonsusceptible, healthy individuals (69 FR
6788 at 6827). FDA concluded that dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids are adulterated because they present an
unreasonable risk of illness or injury under the conditions of use
recommended or suggested in labeling or, if no conditions of use are
suggested or recommended in labeling, under ordinary conditions of use.
FDA does not consider its decision on the use of ephedrine alkaloids in
dietary supplements as precluding the use of sympathomimetic
ingredients in other regulated products for appropriate populations.
The benefits compared to risks should be analyzed in each instance.
In the clinical studies discussed in section III.A of this
document, ephedrine demonstrated a bronchodilator effect in subjects
with mild asthma. This bronchodilator effect provides temporary relief
of shortness of breath, tightness of the chest, and wheezing due to
bronchial asthma. These OTC ephedrine drug products provide health
benefits when used by appropriate populations (i.e., mild asthmatics)
for a limited period of time by relieving the symptoms of an asthma
attack and possibly reducing symptom progression. Relieving symptoms of
a mild asthma attack is an important benefit. The relief of symptoms
enables an asthmatic to perform normal everyday activities without
restrictions brought on by shortness of breath. The finding that OTC
single-ingredient ephedrine drug products provide a health benefit for
mild asthmathics justifies the continued marketing of such products
despite the risks. This favorable benefit-risk assessment distinguishes
ephedrine as a drug from FDA's unfavorable benefit-risk assessment for
dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids.
FDA's decision in this proposed rule to have a different position
for OTC drug products that contain ephedrine compared to dietary
supplements that contain ephedrine alkaloids is not arbitrary or
capricious. The decision is based on differences in the intended uses
of these products, as well as differences in the scientific evidence
available to support the risk-benefit ratio for the products. The risk-
benefit ratio is dependent on several factors, including the product's
intended use, the product's benefits, if any, and the availability of
adequate measures to control risk.
FDA recognizes the risks associated with ephedrine containing drug
products. However, there are several differences between OTC drug
products containing ephedrine and dietary supplements that contain
ephedrine alkaloids that may be relevant to the differing risk-benefit
profiles of these products.
Ephedrine used in a drug product in the treatment of
asthma needs to meet the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards of
identity, strength, quality, and purity. The USP ingredients contain
not less than 98 or 98.5 percent and not more than 100.5 or 101 percent
of the declared amount of ephedrine, ephedrine hydrochloride, or
ephedrine sulfate (Ref. 7). The botanical sources of ephedrine that
were used in dietary supplement products did not have to meet USP
standards and contained varying amounts of ephedrine and other
ephedrine alkaloids depending upon the botanical species that were
used. Although the proportions of the various ephedrine alkaloids in
botanical species vary from one species to another, in most species
used commercially, ephedrine was typically the predominant alkaloid in
the raw material (69 FR 6788 at 6789).
Botanical sources of ephedrine alkaloids contain ephedrine
and other sympathomimetics, including norephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
and methylephedrine. All of these compounds are pharmacologically
active and have variable effects on adrenergic receptors. These
variable effects depend on several factors including dosages, route of
administration, and individual susceptibility (Ref. 8). For example, in
the Hemorrhagic Stroke Project Study, the use of phenylpropanolamine (a
sympathomimetic drug) was associated with a statistically significant
increased risk for hemorrhagic stroke (Ref. 9) whereas pseudoephedrine
was not (Ref. 10). The combination of sympathomimetic compounds may
have additional pharmacological effects on the cardiovascular system
compared to ephedrine alone and, as a consequence, may have additive
risks.
In previous Federal Register notices (47 FR 35344, August
13, 1982; 48 FR 52513, November 18, 1983; and 49 FR 26814, June 29,
1984), FDA recognized the negative consequences of combining multiple
sympathomimetic ingredients or a sympathomimetic plus caffeine in the
same drug product. In these notices, FDA defined any drug product
containing ephedrine in combination with phenylpropanolamine or
caffeine as a new drug requiring a new drug application for marketing.
At the time, FDA was concerned about the additive effects of the
combination of two or more sympathomimetic ingredients without any
demonstrated enhanced benefit. FDA has not permitted marketing of OTC
drug products containing more than one sympathomimetic drug because of
safety concerns.
FDA has received and evaluated adverse reaction reports on both
drug products containing ephedrine and dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids. Based on the differences in composition described
in the previous paragraphs between the drug products and dietary
supplements, adverse event data for dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids may not be completely applicable to OTC ephedrine
drug products.
FDA acknowledges that OTC drug products containing ephedrine
ingredients may be used by consumers who are obese or have high blood
pressure and that these products can cause adverse events. Because
sympathomimetic ingredients may pose risks for adverse events, even
after a single dose, FDA has considered the benefits and risks
associated with the use of these products by these consumers. While OTC
ephedrine drug products are not without risk, they have demonstrated
benefit for asthmatics in the intermittent and temporary treatment of
the symptoms associated with mild asthma. FDA concludes that the
benefit from lessening the severity of an asthma attack outweighs the
risk of an increase in blood pressure when OTC ephedrine drug products
are taken in accordance with a warning to ask a doctor before use if
you have heart
[[Page 40242]]
disease or high blood pressure and with the recommended dosage.
After reviewing the safety and effectiveness information on
ephedrine in OTC drug products, FDA has determined that the benefits of
OTC drug products containing single ingredient ephedrine outweigh the
risk when the product is used according to labeled instructions. In
determining that the benefit outweighs the risk for the marketing of
ephedrine in OTC drug products, FDA finds that there continues to be a
clinically meaningful benefit derived by asthmatics using these
products on an intermittent basis for the temporary relief of
bronchospasm. FDA continues to believe that OTC drug products
containing single ingredient ephedrine are generally recognized as safe
and effective and are not misbranded under the conditions of use in the
bronchodilator FM and with the labeling in this proposed rule.
C. Labeling for OTC Bronchodilator Drug Products
Product labeling (indications, warnings, and directions) is
important for the safe and effective use of ephedrine OTC drug
products. The current and new proposed labeling instructs asthmatics
how to use the product correctly in order to minimize risks. Labeling
recommends use only for the intermittent treatment of mild symptoms of
asthma. Labeling also alerts certain populations with conditions that
increase the risk of adverse events to seek advice from a health care
provider before using the product. Any deviation from the labeling may
put an asthmatic at increased risk for an adverse event and prevent
maximum benefit from the drug. For example, if an asthmatic uses an OTC
ephedrine drug product on a daily basis over a prolonged period of time
because of recurrent symptoms, there are increased risks associated
with the long-term use of ephedrine and with inadequate treatment of
the asthma condition. The indications, warnings, and directions
(including dosage directions) define the conditions of use of the
ingredient. If the drug is not used as labeled, the risks may outweigh
the benefits of the drug. The proposed new labeling for OTC
bronchodilator drug products is intended to inform asthmatics about the
safe and effective use of these drug products. The labeling is also
intended to inform asthmatics that if their asthma condition worsens,
with more frequent or more severe symptoms, they should immediately
consult a physician to reassess the management of the asthmatic
condition and to consider an alternative drug therapy.
FDA stated in the dietary supplement rule that warning statements
cannot adequately protect consumers from the risks associated with
dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids (69 FR 6788 at
6828). In this proposed rule, FDA is proposing new warning statements
and labeling to minimize the risks associated with taking OTC drug
products containing ephedrine ingredients. The difference is based on
the favorable benefit-risk ratio associated with the OTC drug products
containing ephedrine ingredients for the treatment of mild asthma.
Unlike dietary supplements, OTC drug products have demonstrated
benefits in the treatment and mitigation of disease. Based on
controlled clinical investigations (see Sec. 330.10(a)(4)(ii)), FDA
determined that the benefits associated with the use of OTC drug
products containing ephedrine for disease indications outweigh the
risks and justify the use of these products despite their risks.
However, such uses for disease mitigation and treatment are beyond the
scope of permissible dietary supplement uses (69 FR 6788 at 6810). FDA
considers the OTC drug products containing ephedrine ingredients to be
safe and effective and not misbranded for the treatment of physician-
diagnosed mild cases of asthma when appropriately labeled, including
appropriate warning statements. The FM contains labeling that advises a
user of these products:
Not to use this drug unless a diagnosis of asthma has been
made by a doctor,
Not to use the drug if you have certain medical
conditions, and
To consult a doctor when the drug does not provide relief
within a specific time interval or causes side effects that persist.
FDA continues to consider the two types of currently marketed OTC
bronchodilator sympathomimetic ingredients, ephedrine and epinephrine,
to be safe and effective for the self-treatment of mild asthma. These
ingredients have slightly different actions. Oral ephedrine provides
less bronchial muscle relaxation but has a more sustained effect than
inhaled epinephrine. FDA recognizes that use of OTC epinephrine aerosol
drug products to relieve the symptoms of mild asthma may elicit
sympathomimetic effects similar to those elicited by oral ephedrine
ingredients. Consequently, because of the pharmacological similarities
of these two sympathomimetic active ingredients, FDA considers similar
labeling of OTC ephedrine and epinephrine drug products necessary to
inform consumers of the safe and effective use of these OTC drug
products. As previously stated, FDA continues to believe that people
with mild asthma can properly use OTC bronchodilator drug products to
self-treat occasional wheezing, shortness of breath, and tightness of
chest after their asthma has been diagnosed by a physician. FDA has
determined, however, that to help ensure safe and effective use and to
minimize the risks of OTC bronchodilator drug products, additional
labeling is needed for these products.
1. Uses
The current indications for OTC bronchodilator use are in Sec.
341.76(b)(1) and (b)(2). The primary indication is ``For temporary
relief of shortness of breath, tightness of chest, and wheezing due to
bronchial asthma'' (Sec. 341.76(b)(1)).
The labeling of the product may also state one or both of the
following uses (Sec. 341.76(b)(2)):
``For the'' (select one of the following: ``temporary
relief'' or ``symptomatic control'') ``of bronchial asthma.''
``Eases breathing for asthma patients'' (which may be
followed by: ``by reducing spasms of bronchial muscles'').
Two of these indication statements mention temporary relief, while
the third statement does not. Also, in the second statement
manufacturers have the option of selecting either ``temporary relief''
or ``symptomatic control.'' For safe and appropriate use, these use
statements should inform consumers that these products are to be used
for temporary relief of occasional symptoms of mild asthma. Therefore,
FDA is proposing to revise the indication statement in Sec. 341.76(b)
to a single statement as follows: ``for temporary relief of occasional
symptoms of mild asthma: [bullet] wheezing [bullet] tightness of chest
[bullet] shortness of breath''.
2. Warnings
a. Warnings related to effects on the cardiovascular system. Oral
ephedrine has effects on the cardiovascular system (Refs. 11 through
14). Cardiovascular effects include elevation of the systolic and
diastolic blood pressure (Ref. 11). Other effects include awareness of
heartbeat and rapid heartbeat accompanied usually by some elevation of
blood pressure (Ref. 14). Pressor responses are due partly to
vasoconstriction but mainly to cardiac stimulation. The force of
myocardial contraction is enhanced by the drug,
[[Page 40243]]
and cardiac output is augmented, provided venous return is adequate.
The renal, abdominal, and intestinal blood flows are decreased; whereas
the coronary, cerebral, and muscle blood flows are increased (Ref. 11).
FDA is aware of reported adverse drug events on the cardiovascular
system associated with the use of ephedrine-containing drug products.
Similar events have been reported for dietary supplement products
containing ephedrine alkaloids (69 FR 6788 at 6814 through 6815). The
reported adverse events include elevations in blood pressure and/or
heart beat, and serious adverse events include abnormal heart rhythm
(arrhythmias), heart attack, and stroke. These adverse events are
consistent with the known pharmacology of sympathomimetic drugs, as
reported in the literature. The reports we have received for ephedrine
containing bronchodilator drug products were associated with use that
was more frequent or in higher amounts than the labeled dose. However,
even at recommended doses, many people have an increased risk for a
serious side effect to occur.
Sympathomimetic drugs, including ephedrine ingredients, mimic the
effects (stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system) of naturally
occurring epinephrine and norepinephrine (Ref. 11). In addition to
their direct pharmacological effects, many of these ingredients also
stimulate the release of norepinephrine from nerve endings. The release
of norepinephrine further increases the sympathomimetic effects of
these drugs on the body, at least transiently. Susceptible individuals,
who have coronary artery disease or heart failure and use
sympathomimetic drugs, are at increased risk for serious adverse
events, including heart attack, stroke, and death. Sympathomimetic
drugs also can cause abnormal heart rhythms (pro-arrhythmic effect) and
can induce cardiac arrhythmias in susceptible individuals, such as
those with underlying coronary artery disease, heart failure, or an
abnormal cardiac conduction system.
Over longer periods of use, the risk for adverse health effects to
susceptible individuals becomes greater due to a sustained elevation in
blood pressure. Ephedrine and epinephrine ingredients are expected to,
and evidence indicates that they do, have similar pharmacological
effects, such as increased blood pressure and heart rate, to those of
other sympathomimetic ingredients (Refs. 11 and 12). The
pharmacological effects of ephedrine and epinephrine (and other
sympathomimetics), both efficacious and adverse, will vary dependent of
the dose, route of administration (e.g., oral versus inhaled), and
individual susceptibility.
Based on reports that FDA has received, the risk of adverse events
from ephedrine can occur at any dosage and may increase when taking a
higher dose or taking more frequent doses than at the recommended
dosing interval. Therefore, FDA proposes to revise product labeling to
inform consumers that use of an OTC bronchodilator drug product can
cause an increase in blood pressure and heart rate, which could lead to
more serious problems such as heart attack, stroke, and death; and the
risks for these problems may increase if the product is taken at higher
doses or more frequently than recommended. The labeling also warns
consumers against the use of any OTC bronchodilator drug products
without a physician's diagnosis of asthma, and directs consumers to
consult with a doctor before use, if they have a diagnosis of certain
conditions, such as heart disease and high blood pressure.
The proposed labeling for these products has been modified from the
labeling in the FM to follow the ``Drug Facts'' format in Sec. 201.66
(21 CFR 201.66). This standardized format and content for product
labeling is intended to enable consumers to better read and understand
the labeling information and to promote the safe and effective use of
OTC drug products. The Drug Facts labeling format provides a more
structured, organized, and compact presentation of the proposed
labeling information for these products. Accordingly, the proposed
labeling should help consumers to use these OTC bronchodilator drug
products more safely and effectively.
Current labeling in Sec. 341.76(c)(2) states ``Do not use this
product if you have heart disease, high blood pressure, * * *.'' In
this proposed rule, FDA is adding the following statements under the
heading ``When using this product'': ``[Bullet] increased blood
pressure or heart rate can occur, which could lead to more serious
problems such as heart attack, stroke, and death. Your risk may
increase if you take more frequently or more than the recommended dose.
[Bullet] * * * rapid heart beat * * * may occur. If these symptoms
persist or get worse, consult a doctor right away.''
b. Warnings related to effects on the nervous system (central and
peripheral). Ephedrine is known to elicit physiological responses
similar to catecholamines (i.e., groups of chemically related
neurotransmitters, such as epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine).
These drugs have stimulant effects on the sympathetic nervous system
and thus are classified as sympathomimetic agents (i.e., agents
stimulating the sympathetic nervous system (Refs. 12 and 13)). The
central effects of ephedrine and epinephrine ingredients include
tenseness, nervousness, tremor, and sleeplessness. The peripheral
effects primarily include the effects on the cardiovascular system.
The central nervous system effects appear to limit the maximally
tolerated dose, which varies widely among individuals as judged by
clinical experience (Ref. 14). Overdose results in exaggeration of the
side effects which individuals describe as disagreeable and may help to
limit overuse or abuse.
Reported adverse drug events and the known pharmacological data
associated with the use of ephedrine and epinephrine ingredients
include nervousness, tremor, and seizure. Because of these effects, FDA
is proposing to revise product labeling to inform consumers that use of
OTC bronchodilator drug products more frequently or at higher doses
than recommended may cause adverse effects such as seizure and tremor.
Current labeling in Sec. 341.76(c)(5)(ii) states ``Some users of this
product may experience nervousness, tremor, sleeplessness * * *. If
these symptoms persist or get worse, consult your doctor.'' In this
proposed rule, FDA is placing these warnings under the heading ``When
using this product'' (Sec. 341.76(c)(4)(ii)) and adding seizure to
this warning to read as follows:
`` nervousness, sleeplessness, * * *, tremor, and seizure
may occur. If these symptoms persist or get worse, consult a doctor
right away.''
FDA is aware that persons with seizure disorders who use ephedrine
are at increased risk for experiencing a seizure (Refs. 15, 16, and
17). Epinephrine ingredients have similar pharmacological effects
(Refs. 11 and 12). Therefore, in this proposed rule, FDA is amending
the warnings to add ``seizures'' as one of the conditions for which a
person should ask a doctor before using OTC bronchodilator drug
products.
c. Warnings related to effects on urination. Ephedrine and
epinephrine ingredients may cause difficulty in urination in males,
particularly in older males, who might have an enlarged prostate gland.
Current labeling in Sec. 341.76(c)(2) states ``Do not use this product
if you have * * * difficulty in urination due to enlargement of the
prostate gland.'' In this proposed rule, FDA is simplifying this
language under the heading ``Ask a doctor before use if you have'' to
read ``* * * trouble
[[Page 40244]]
urinating due to an enlarged prostate gland''.
d. Warnings related to glaucoma. Current warnings in the monograph
for OTC bronchodilator drug products do not include any information
about glaucoma. Glaucoma is a group of diseases that are distinguished
by an increase in pressure inside the eye. There are two major types of
glaucoma: (1) Chronic or primary open-angle glaucoma and (2) acute
closed-angle glaucoma (also known as narrow angle glaucoma).
Approximately 90 to 95 percent of people with glaucoma have the open-
angle variety, while 5 to 10 percent have closed-angle glaucoma (Ref.
18). Normally, aqueous humor (a clear fluid produced within the eye)
drains out of the eye through a drainage site. However, in people with
narrow angle glaucoma, sympathomimetic drugs (e.g., ephedrine) cause
pupil dilatation (mydrasis) that may result in blockage of the normal
drainage site (Refs. 18 through 21). Because the fluid within the eye
cannot drain properly in these predisposed individuals, the fluid
pressure inside the eyeball increases quickly, leading to the symptoms
of narrow angle glaucoma (Ref. 19). Therefore, in this proposed rule,
FDA is proposing to add ``narrow angle glaucoma'' as one of the
conditions under the warning subheading ``Ask a doctor before use if
you have''.
FDA considers it beneficial for consumers to know this information
and encourages them to ask their physician in order to be fully
informed. FDA has previously included this type of information in the
labeling of OTC ophthalmic vasoconstrictor drug products containing
topically applied ephedrine (21 CFR 349.75(c)(2)).
e. Warnings related to nausea and loss of appetite. Ephedrine may
cause nausea and loss of appetite in some people. Current labeling in
Sec. 341.76(c)(5)(ii) states ``Some users of this product may
experience * * * nausea and loss of appetite. If these symptoms persist
or get worse, consult your doctor.'' In this proposed rule, FDA is
deleting ``nausea'' and ``loss of appetite'' as side effects because
they are minor in comparison to other side effects included in product
labeling.
f. Warnings related to interactions with drugs used for psychiatric
or emotional conditions. Current labeling in Sec. 341.76(c)(4)
contains a drug interaction precaution not to use an OTC bronchodilator
drug product ``if you are now taking a prescription monoamine oxidase
inhibitor (MAOI) (certain drugs for depression, psychiatric, or
emotional conditions * * *).'' In this proposed rule, to be consistent
with the Drug Facts labeling format in Sec. 201.66, FDA is deleting
the words ``Drug interaction precaution.'' FDA believes that the
information about MAOIs in the labeling may be ineffective because some
users of OTC bronchodilator drug products may not know that a drug they
are taking is an MAOI. In this proposed rule, FDA is including
information about the use of prescription drugs for depression or
psychiatric or emotional conditions under the subheading ``Ask a doctor
or pharmacist before use if you are''. Therefore, in this proposed
rule, FDA is including an additional warning:
`` Ask a doctor or pharmacist before use if you are taking
prescription drugs for * * * depression, or psychiatric or emotional
conditions''.
g. Warnings related to interactions with other drugs, foods, and
beverages. FDA is aware that certain other drugs, foods, and beverages
can interact with OTC ephedrine and epinephrine ingredients and cause
an increased stimulant effect. The drugs include other sympathomimetic
agents such as pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, and
caffeine. Some foods and beverages contain caffeine, and some dietary
supplements contain other ingredients reported or claimed to have a
stimulant effect.
FDA previously determined that certain combinations of these
ingredients presented a potential hazard to health. In the Federal
Register of August 13, 1982 (47 FR 35344), FDA announced that it had
determined that combination drug products consisting of caffeine,
phenylpropanolamine, and ephedrine are new drugs and are required to be
the subject of an approved new drug application.
A number of sympathomimetic amines have been marketed as
prescription drugs used for the treatment of obesity. These include
benzphetamine hydrochloride, dextroamphetamine sulfate, diethylpropion
hydrochloride, methamphetamine hydrochloride, phendimetrazine tartrate,
phentermine hydrochloride and phentermine resin, and sibutramine
hydrochloride monohydrate. These sympathomimetic drugs can interact
with OTC ephedrine and epinephrine bronchodilator drug products (also
sympathomimetics) and cause an increased stimulant effect. Current
labeling in Sec. 341.76(c)(3) states ``Do not use this product * * *
if you are taking any prescription drug for asthma unless directed by a
doctor.'' In this proposed rule, FDA is adding ``obesity'' and ``weight
control'' to this warning, which now appears under the subheading ``Ask
a doctor or pharmacist before use if you are,'' to read as follows:
`` taking prescription drugs for * * * obesity, weight
control * * *''.
Two studies indicate that the stimulant effects of ephedrine
increase when combined with caffeine (Refs. 22 and 23). Caffeine is a
nervous system stimulant that can induce nervousness, insomnia, and
tachycardia (rapid heart rate) (Refs. 24, 25, and 26). FDA is concerned
that taking caffeine and ephedrine at the same time may increase
sympathetic stimulation of the cardiovascular system and nervous
system, e.g., increased heart rate, insomnia, and nervousness. In the
Federal Register of September 27, 2001 (66 FR 49276), FDA issued a
final rule establishing that any oral OTC bronchodilator active
ingredient in combination with certain pharmacological drug categories,
including any stimulant active ingredient, is not generally recognized
as safe and effective and is misbranded for OTC use. FDA stated that it
did not believe that any such combination drug products are currently
marketed OTC.
Although OTC bronchodilator drug products containing ephedrine
ingredients in combination with caffeine are not allowed and are not
currently marketed, current labeling of OTC ephedrine drug products
does not contain a warning about the concurrent use of products
containing caffeine or other ingredients that may have a stimulant
effect. FDA considers it essential to warn consumers of the risk of
excessive use of ephedrine and epinephrine ingredients from any source
or use in combination with other products that have stimulant effects.
These products include other sympathomimetic drugs, foods or beverages
containing caffeine, and dietary supplements containing ingredients
reported or claimed to have a stimulant effect.
In this proposed rule, FDA is proposing to add the following
warnings to the FM to address concurrent use of different stimulant
products:
Under the subheading ``Ask a doctor or pharmacist before
use if you are'', the statement ``taking any drug that contains
phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine, ephedrine, or caffeine (such as for
allergy, cough-cold, or pain)''.
Under the subheading ``When using this product'', the
statements ``avoid caffeine-containing foods or beverages'' and ``avoid
dietary supplements containing ingredients reported or claimed to have
a stimulant effect''.
h. Other additional warnings. The FM for OTC bronchodilator drug
products contains seven active ingredients (see
[[Page 40245]]
section I.B of this document). FDA believes that additional warnings
are necessary to inform mild asthmatics of the need to carefully follow
the warnings and directions for OTC bronchodilator drug products
containing any of these active ingredients. FDA is also concerned that
possible serious consequences could develop from excessive use of OTC
bronchodilator drug products, or continued use of these products by an
asthmatic who needs professional medical attention. Therefore, in this
proposed rule, FDA is including additional warnings in Sec. 341.76 for
OTC bronchodilator drug products.
FDA considers it necessary to inform mild asthmatics that asthma,
if not treated appropriately, can worsen and be life-threatening. To
emphasize this concern in this proposed rule, FDA is including the
following ``Asthma alert'' warning in Sec. 341.76(c)(5)(i) for
ephedrine products:
Asthma alert: Because asthma can be life threatening, see a doctor
if you [in bold type]:
are not better in 60 minutes
get worse
need [insert total number of dosage units that equals 150
milligrams] in any day
use more than [insert total number of dosage units that
equals 100 milligrams] a day for more than 3 days a week
have more than 2 asthma attacks in a week
In this proposed rule, FDA is including the following similar
``Asthma alert'' warning in Sec. 341.76(c)(6)(i) for epinephrine
products for use in a hand-held rubber bulb nebulizer, which states:
Asthma alert: Because asthma can be life threatening, see a doctor
if you [in bold type]
are not better in 20 minutes
get worse
need 12 inhalations in any day
use more than 9 inhalations a day for more than 3 days a
week
have more than 2 asthma attacks in a week
i. New labeling format. In order to make OTC drug product labeling
easier to read and understand, and to help ensure the safe and
effective use of all OTC drug products, FDA is revising the current
labeling in the OTC bronchodilator FM to conform to the standardized
OTC drug product labeling format in Sec. 201.66. This labeling format
is included in this proposed rule and requires the use of specific
language in the labeling of OTC bronchodilator drug products.
3. Directions
FDA is proposing to revise the directions in Sec. 341.76(d)(1) and
(d)(2) to include the statement ``do not exceed dosage'' [in bold type]
as the first bulleted statement under the heading ``Directions''. This
revision is intended to more prominently inform users of these products
not to exceed the recommended dosage.
D. Related FDA Regulatory Actions
FDA has exercised its authority under the act to take regulatory
action against OTC bronchodilator drug products containing ephedrine
ingredients being marketed directly or indirectly for unapproved uses
(e.g., stimulant, weight control, and athletic performance enhancement)
via a product name that suggested one of these uses. Since the 1995
proposal, FDA issued warning letters to companies whose products have
been linked to significant adverse reactions.
One letter was for a product that contained ephedrine and another
ingredient (an expectorant) (Ref. 27). FDA noted that the ``statement
of identity'' and ``indications'' portion of the product label state
the correct uses. However, the trade name of this product suggested it
was intended to aid in weight loss, an unapproved use for these
ingredients. FDA stated its belief that because there are serious
health risks inherent in the promotion of ephedrine for weight loss,
the trade name of the product must be changed in order to ensure that
the product is not promoted for the unacceptable weight loss use.
FDA stated in another letter that the product's trade name suggests
it is intended for stimulant and recreational use (Ref. 28). FDA had
received reports of adverse reactions linked to the use of this product
as a stimulant.
FDA requested that these manufacturers take action immediately to
correct these violations and stated that failure to do so may result in
regulatory action (e.g., seizure and/or injunction). In response to
these warning letters, the manufacturers agreed to revise their
ephedrine-containing drug product trade names (Refs. 29 and 30).
E. Related DEA Regulatory Actions
In the Federal Register of October 11, 1994 (59 FR 51365), DEA
issued a final rule eliminating the threshold for single-entity
ephedrine drug products. The threshold is an amount of a listed
chemical that determines if a transaction such as receipt or sale of
the chemical is a regulated transaction under 21 CFR part 1310. The
final rule subjected all transactions involving bulk ephedrine and
single-entity ephedrine drug products, regardless of size, to the
requirements for regulated transactions for listed chemicals under the
applicable provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (see 21 U.S.C.
802(39)(A)), which includes recordkeeping, reporting, and notification.
DEA regulations require that in retail settings open to the public
where single-entity ephedrine products are sold, such drugs must be
stocked behind a counter where only employees have access (21 CFR
1309.71(a)(2)). In addition, each person who sells these products must
identify the other party to the transaction by having the other party
present documents that would verify the identity (i.e., a driver's
license and one other form of identification) and address of the other
party (21 CFR 1310.06 and 1310.07(d)). The required recordkeeping
includes the date of the transaction, quantity, form of packaging of
the ephedrine product, method of transfer (company truck, picked up by
customer, etc.), and type of identification used by the purchaser to
the regulated person at the time the order is placed (21 CFR 1310.06).
IV. FDA's Tentative Conclusions
A. Summary of Major Labeling Changes
Over the past 28 years since the Panel report was published,
updated guidelines for the treatment of asthma have been issued, e.g.,
``Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma'' (Ref. 5). The
benefits of bronchodilator drug products containing ephedrine or
epinephrine as a treatment for mild bronchospasms continue to outweigh
their risks. FDA recognizes that some people with asthma have used such
products intermittently for many years and obtain a benefit from
continued availability. FDA is proposing to update the labeling for
these products to provide for safer and more effective use. Based on
the available evidence, FDA is proposing to amend the FM for OTC
bronchodilator drug products to make the changes set forth in the
following paragraphs (sections IV.A.1 through IV.A.3 of this document).
1. Indications
FDA is proposing to revise the indications in Sec. 341.76(b)(1)
and (b)(2) to a single indication in the new OTC drug labeling format.
[[Page 40246]]
2. Warnings
FDA is proposing to revise the entire warnings section as follows:
Add an ``Asthma alert'' section that lists four conditions
in which the user of the product should see a doctor. This ``Asthma
alert'' shall appear as the first statement under the heading
``Warnings'' and parts of the alert shall be in bold type. This new
warning replaces the warning previously found in Sec. 341.76(c)(5)(i)
for ephedrine ingredients and in Sec. 341.76(c)(6)(ii) for epinephrine
ingredients.
List a number of statements that follow the subheading
``Do not use.'' These statements include the warnings previously found
in Sec. 341.76(c)(1), (c)(4), and (c)(6)(iii), where applicable, for
products intended for use in a hand-held rubber bulb nebulizer.
List a number of conditions for which consumers should
consult a doctor before using these products under the subheading ``Ask
a doctor before use if you have.'' This list includes the conditions
previously stated in Sec. 341.76(c)(2), plus several additional
conditions.
List a number of other drugs that people might also be
taking at the same time and thus should consult a doctor before using
the OTC bronchodilator drug product. This information appears under the
subheading ``Ask a doctor or pharmacist before use if you are.'' This
list includes prescription drugs for asthma previously stated in Sec.
341.76(c)(3) plus a new list of other drugs that could cause side
effects when used in conjunction with ephedrine or epinephrine
ingredients.
List certain information that consumers need to know under
the heading ``When using this product.'' This information includes the
following:
[ctrcir] Side effects that may occur (including side effects
currently listed in Sec. 341.76(c)(5)(ii)),
[ctrcir] Information about problems that may occur if the drug is
taken more frequently or at a higher than recommended dosage (currently
in Sec. 341.76(c)(6)(i) for products containing epinephrine
ingredients, and which FDA is now proposing to include for both
products containing ephedrine or epinephrine ingredients), and
[ctrcir] New information about avoiding certain foods and dietary
supplements while using an OTC bronchodilator drug product.
FDA considers the new information about the risks associated with an
increase in blood pressure and heart rate to be the most important of
this information and that consumers' attention should be specifically
directed to this information. Accordingly, FDA is proposing that this
information appear in bold type as the first statement in this section.
3. Directions
FDA is proposing to revise the directions in Sec. 341.76(d)(1) and
(d)(2) to include the statement ``do not exceed dosage'' [in bold type]
as the first bulleted statement under the heading ``Directions''.
B. Statement About Warnings
Mandating warnings in an OTC drug monograph does not require a
finding that any or all of the OTC drug products covered by the
monograph actually caused an adverse event, and FDA does not so find.
Nor does FDA's requirement of warnings repudiate the prior OTC drug
monographs and monograph rulemakings under which the affected drug
products have been lawfully marketed. Rather, as a consumer protection
agency, FDA has determined that warnings are necessary to ensure that
these OTC drug products continue to be safe and effective for their
labeled indications under ordinary conditions of use as those terms are
defined in the act. This judgment balances the benefits of these drug
products against their potential risks (see Sec. 330.10(a)).
FDA's decision to act in this instance need not meet the standard
of proof required to prevail in a private tort action (Glastetter v.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Corp., 252 F.3d 986, 991 (8th Cir. 2001)). To
mandate warnings, or take similar regulatory action, FDA need not show,
nor do we allege, actual causation. For an