Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerance, 40196-40199 [05-13370]

Download as PDF 40196 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP State citation Title/subject State approval/submittal date EPA approval date Explanation * * * * * * Chapter 115 (Reg 5)—Control of Air Pollution From Volatile Organic Compounds * * * * * Section 115.240. Section 115.241. Section 155.242. Section 115.243. Section 115.244.. Section 115.245. Section 115.246. Section 115.247. Section 115.248. Section 115.249. * * * Subchapter C: Volatile Organic Compound Transfer Operations * * * * * Division 4: Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions (Stage II) at Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facilities Stage II Vapor Recovery 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. Definitions and List of California Air Resources Board Certified Stage II Equipment. Emission Specifications ........ 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. Control Requirements ........... 11/6/02 Alternate Control Requirements. Inspection Requirements ...... 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. Testing Requirements ........... 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. Recordkeeping Requirements. Exemptions ........................... 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. Training Requirements ......... 11/6/02 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. Counties and Compliance Schedules. 11/6/02 * 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. 3/29/05, 70 FR 15773. * * * [FR Doc. 05–13695 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [OPP–2005–0142; FRL–7720–1] Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerance Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of imidacloprid 1[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro2-imidazolidinimine in or on soybean, seed and soybean, meal. Gustafson LLC requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA). EPA is also deleting certain imidacloprid tolerances that are no longer needed as a result of this action. DATES: This regulation is effective July 13, 2005. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before September 12, 2005. VerDate jul<14>2003 * 15:05 Jul 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 * * To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket identification (ID) number OPP–2005– 0142. All documents in the docket are listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305–5805. ADDRESSES: Dani Daniel, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 703 305-5409; e-mail address:daniel.dani@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to: • Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers. • Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers. • Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators. • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; residential users. E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM 13JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? In addition to using EDOCKET (https://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at https:// www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/. II. Background and Statutory Findings In the Federal Register of June 13, 2004 (68 FR 35303) (FRL–7310–8), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 4F6825) by Gustafson LLC, 1400 Preston Road, Suite 400, Plano, Texas 75093. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.472 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide imidacloprid, 1-[(6-chloro-3pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2imidazolidinimine, in or on soybean, seed at 1.0 parts per million (ppm), and soybean, meal at 2.5 ppm. The proposed tolerance for soybean, meal was subsequently revised by the petitioner to a proposed tolerance of 4.0 ppm. That notice included a summary of the petition prepared by Gustafson LLC, the registrant. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. EPA is also deleting an established tolerance in § 180.472 that is no longer needed as a result of this action. The tolerance deletion under § 180.472(b) is a time-limited tolerance established under section 18 emergency exemptions that is superceded by the establishment of general tolerances for imidacloprid § 180.472(a). The changes to § 180.472 are as follows: 1. The time-limited tolerance for soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm is removed from § 180.472(b). VerDate jul<14>2003 15:05 Jul 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 2. Tolerances for soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm and soybean, meal at 4.0 ppm are added to § 180.472(a). Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue....’’ EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the regulatory requirements of section 408 of FFDCA and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL–5754– 7). III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section 408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of imidacloprid on soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm and soybean, meal at 4.0 ppm. On June 13, 2003 the Agency issued a Final rule (68 FR 35303, FRL–7310– 8) establishing tolerances for residues of imidacloprid in or on acerola; artichoke, globe; avocado; banana (import); canistel; corn, pop, grain; corn, pop, stover; cranberry; currant; elderberry; feijoa; fruit, stone, group 12; gooseberry; huckleberry; guava; jaboticaba; juneberry; lingonberry; longan; lychee; mango; mustard, seed; okra; papaya; passionfruit; persimmon; pulasan; rambutan; salal; sapodilla; sapote, black; sapote, mamey; Spanish lime; star apple; starfruit; strawberry; vegetable, leaves of root and tuber, group 2; vegetable, legume, group 6, except PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 40197 soybean; vegetable, root and tuber, group 1, except sugar beet; watercress; wax jambu. When the Agency conducted the risk assessments in support of this tolerance action it assumed that imidacloprid residues would be present on soybean, seed and soybean, meal as well as on all foods covered by the proposed and established tolerances. Residues on soybean, seeds and soybean, meal were included because there was a pending application under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., to register imidacloprid on soybean, seed and soybean, meal. Therefore, establishing the soybean, seed and soybean, meal tolerances will not change the most recent estimated aggregate risks resulting from use of imidacloprid, as discussed in the June 13, 2003 issue of the Federal Register. Refer to the June 13, 2003 Federal Register document for a detailed discussion of the aggregate risk assessments and determination of safety. EPA relies upon those risk assessments and the findings made in the Federal Register document in support of this action. Based on the risk assessments discussed in the final rule issued in the Federal Register of June 13, 2003 (68 FR 35303) (FRL–7310–8), EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to imidacloprid residues. IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology Adequate enforcement methods are available for determination of imidacloprid residues of concern in plant (Bayer Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Method 00200) and livestock commodities (Bayer GC/ MS Method 00191). These methods have undergone successful EPA petition method validations (PMVs), and the registrant has fulfilled the remaining requirements for additional raw data, method validation, independent laboratory validation (ILV), and an acceptable confirmatory method (high performance liquid chromatography/ ultraviolet (HPLC/UV) Method 00357). The methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350; telephone number: (410) 305–2905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov. B. International Residue Limits There are no established Codex maximum residue limits (MRLs) for E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM 13JYR1 40198 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations imidacloprid in or on the commodities in the subject petition. V. Conclusion Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of imidacloprid, 1-[(6chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2imidazolidinimine, in or on soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm and soybean, meal at 4.0 ppm. VI. Objections and Hearing Requests Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to FFDCA by FQPA, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made. The new section 408(g) of FFDCA provides essentially the same process for persons to‘‘object’’ to a regulation for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d) of FFDCA, as was provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days. A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing? You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number OPP–2005–0142 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before September 12, 2005. 1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor’s contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the VerDate jul<14>2003 15:05 Jul 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. You may also deliver your request to the Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 20005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 564–6255. 2. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A., you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail your copies, identified by docket ID number OPP–2005–0142, to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the PIRIB described in ADDRESSES. You may also send an electronic copy of your request via email to:opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries. B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing? A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32). PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104–4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM 13JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have federalism implications’’ is defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.’’ This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’ as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal implications’’ is defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.’’ This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. VIII. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). VerDate jul<14>2003 15:05 Jul 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 40199 melons, grapes, and bananas is expected, to the extent any is present, to Environmental protection, be indistinguishable from the Administrative practice and procedure, background levels of existing dietary Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping exposure resulting from the naturallyoccurring sources of iodine chemicals. requirements. The effect of this designation is that Dated: June 23, 2005. EPA does not require that a tolerance or Lois Rossi, exemption from tolerance under section Director, Registration Division, Office of 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Pesticide Programs. Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a, be established as a condition of registration I Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is of the pesticide under the Federal amended as follows: Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide PART 180—[AMENDED] Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et. seq. DATES: This regulation is effective July I 1. The authority citation for part 180 13, 2005. Objections and requests for continues to read as follows: hearings must be received on or before Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. September 12, 2005. I 2. Section 180.472 is amended by ADDRESSES: To submit a written adding alphabetically ‘‘soybean, meal’’ objection or hearing request follow the and ‘‘soybean, seed’’ to the table in paragraph (a), and by removing the entry detailed instructions as provided in Unit III. of the SUPPLEMENTARY for ‘‘soybean, seed’’ from the table in INFORMATION. EPA has established a paragraph (b): docket for this action under Docket § 180.472 Imidacloprid; tolerances for identification (ID) number OPP–2004– residues. 0322. All documents in the docket are (a) * * * listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although Expiration/ listed in the index, some information is Parts per Commodity revocation million not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other date information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other * * * * * Soybean, meal .. 4.0 None material, such as copyrighted material, Soybean, seed .. 1.0 None is not placed on the Internet and will be * * * * * publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket * * * * * materials are available either electronically in EDOCKET or in hard [FR Doc. 05–13370 Filed 7–12–05; 8:45 am] copy at the Public Information and BILLING CODE 6560–50–S Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday AGENCY through Friday, excluding legal 40 CFR Part 180 holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305–5805. [OPP–2004–0322; FRL–7714–4] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Potassium Triiodide; Pesticide Mary L. Waller, Registration Division Chemical Not Requiring a Tolerance or (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, an Exemption from Tolerance Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, AGENCY: Environmental Protection DC 20460–0001; telephone number: Agency (EPA). (703) 308–9354; e-mail address: ACTION: Final rule. waller.mary@epa.gov. SUMMARY: EPA is designating the use of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the active ingredient, potassium I. General Information triiodide as a non-food use pesticide when applied to melons, grapes and A. Does this Action Apply to Me? bananas grown in foreign countries, and You may be potentially affected by is adding an entry to 40 CFR 180.2020 this action if you are an agricultural noting the non-food use determination. producer, food manufacturer, or This determination is based on the pesticide manufacturer. Potentially Agency’s evaluation of data which indicates that dietary exposure to iodide affected entities may include, but are not limited to: and/or iodine resulting from the application of potassium triiodide to • Crop production (NAICS code 111) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM 13JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40196-40199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP-2005-0142; FRL-7720-1]


Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of 
imidacloprid 1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-
imidazolidinimine in or on soybean, seed and soybean, meal. Gustafson 
LLC requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 
(FQPA). EPA is also deleting certain imidacloprid tolerances that are 
no longer needed as a result of this action.

DATES: This regulation is effective July 13, 2005. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 12, 2005.

ADDRESSES: To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the 
detailed instructions as provided in Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 
identification (ID) number OPP-2005-0142. All documents in the docket 
are listed in the EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although 
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., 
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on 
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records 
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. 
Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket 
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dani Daniel, Registration Division 
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone 
number: 703 305-5409; e-mail address:daniel.dani@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers; 
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
     Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and 
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
     Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural 
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; 
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural 
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and 
floriculture workers; residential users.

[[Page 40197]]

    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other 
Related Information?

     In addition to using EDOCKET (https://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you 
may access this Federal Register document electronically through the 
EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 
CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of June 13, 2004 (68 FR 35303) (FRL-7310-
8), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 
4F6825) by Gustafson LLC, 1400 Preston Road, Suite 400, Plano, Texas 
75093. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.472 be amended by 
establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide imidacloprid, 
1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine, in or on 
soybean, seed at 1.0 parts per million (ppm), and soybean, meal at 2.5 
ppm. The proposed tolerance for soybean, meal was subsequently revised 
by the petitioner to a proposed tolerance of 4.0 ppm. That notice 
included a summary of the petition prepared by Gustafson LLC, the 
registrant. There were no comments received in response to the notice 
of filing.
    EPA is also deleting an established tolerance in Sec.  180.472 that 
is no longer needed as a result of this action. The tolerance deletion 
under Sec.  180.472(b) is a time-limited tolerance established under 
section 18 emergency exemptions that is superceded by the establishment 
of general tolerances for imidacloprid Sec.  180.472(a).
    The changes to Sec.  180.472 are as follows:
    1. The time-limited tolerance for soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm is 
removed from Sec.  180.472(b).
    2. Tolerances for soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm and soybean, meal at 4.0 
ppm are added to Sec.  180.472(a).
    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical 
residue....''
    EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from 
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the 
regulatory requirements of section 408 of FFDCA and a complete 
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on 
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-
5754-7).

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the 
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to 
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section 
408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for a tolerance for residues of imidacloprid on 
soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm and soybean, meal at 4.0 ppm.
    On June 13, 2003 the Agency issued a Final rule (68 FR 35303, FRL-
7310-8) establishing tolerances for residues of imidacloprid in or on 
acerola; artichoke, globe; avocado; banana (import); canistel; corn, 
pop, grain; corn, pop, stover; cranberry; currant; elderberry; feijoa; 
fruit, stone, group 12; gooseberry; huckleberry; guava; jaboticaba; 
juneberry; lingonberry; longan; lychee; mango; mustard, seed; okra; 
papaya; passionfruit; persimmon; pulasan; rambutan; salal; sapodilla; 
sapote, black; sapote, mamey; Spanish lime; star apple; starfruit; 
strawberry; vegetable, leaves of root and tuber, group 2; vegetable, 
legume, group 6, except soybean; vegetable, root and tuber, group 1, 
except sugar beet; watercress; wax jambu. When the Agency conducted the 
risk assessments in support of this tolerance action it assumed that 
imidacloprid residues would be present on soybean, seed and soybean, 
meal as well as on all foods covered by the proposed and established 
tolerances. Residues on soybean, seeds and soybean, meal were included 
because there was a pending application under the Federal Insecticide, 
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., to register 
imidacloprid on soybean, seed and soybean, meal. Therefore, 
establishing the soybean, seed and soybean, meal tolerances will not 
change the most recent estimated aggregate risks resulting from use of 
imidacloprid, as discussed in the June 13, 2003 issue of the Federal 
Register. Refer to the June 13, 2003 Federal Register document for a 
detailed discussion of the aggregate risk assessments and determination 
of safety. EPA relies upon those risk assessments and the findings made 
in the Federal Register document in support of this action.
    Based on the risk assessments discussed in the final rule issued in 
the Federal Register of June 13, 2003 (68 FR 35303) (FRL-7310-8), EPA 
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate 
exposure to imidacloprid residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methods are available for determination of 
imidacloprid residues of concern in plant (Bayer Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Method 00200) and livestock commodities 
(Bayer GC/MS Method 00191). These methods have undergone successful EPA 
petition method validations (PMVs), and the registrant has fulfilled 
the remaining requirements for additional raw data, method validation, 
independent laboratory validation (ILV), and an acceptable confirmatory 
method (high performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet (HPLC/UV) 
Method 00357).
    The methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry 
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address: 
residuemethods@epa.gov.

B. International Residue Limits

    There are no established Codex maximum residue limits (MRLs) for

[[Page 40198]]

imidacloprid in or on the commodities in the subject petition.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of 
imidacloprid, 1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-
imidazolidinimine, in or on soybean, seed at 1.0 ppm and soybean, meal 
at 4.0 ppm.

VI. Objections and Hearing Requests

    Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may 
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request 
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which 
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in 
40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those regulations require 
some modification to reflect the amendments made to FFDCA by FQPA, EPA 
will continue to use those procedures, with appropriate adjustments, 
until the necessary modifications can be made. The new section 408(g) 
of FFDCA provides essentially the same process for persons to``object'' 
to a regulation for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance 
issued by EPA under new section 408(d) of FFDCA, as was provided in the 
old sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. However, the period for filing 
objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?

    You must file your objection or request a hearing on this 
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit 
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must 
identify docket ID number OPP-2005-0142 in the subject line on the 
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and 
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before September 
12, 2005.
    1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific 
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for 
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the 
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a 
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a 
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). 
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing 
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that 
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion 
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be 
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
    Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your request to the 
Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW., 
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 564-6255.
    2. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or 
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A., you 
should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion 
in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail your 
copies, identified by docket ID number OPP-2005-0142, to: Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and 
Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the 
PIRIB described in ADDRESSES. You may also send an electronic copy of 
your request via e-mail to:opp-docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII file 
format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of 
encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will 
also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII file format. 
Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an 
electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?

    A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator 
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a 
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable 
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, 
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the 
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the 
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought 
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 
CFR 178.32).

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of 
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and 
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of 
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does 
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose 
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under 
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive 
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice 
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, 
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive 
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health 
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does 
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency 
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since 
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a 
petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this 
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled 
Federalism(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of 
regulatory policies that

[[Page 40199]]

have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism 
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations 
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food 
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action 
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has 
determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications'' as 
described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and 
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable 
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in 
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' 
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive 
order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' 
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal 
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to 
this rule.

VIII. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final 
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 23, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Section 180.472 is amended by adding alphabetically ``soybean, 
meal'' and ``soybean, seed'' to the table in paragraph (a), and by 
removing the entry for ``soybean, seed'' from the table in paragraph 
(b):


Sec.  180.472  Imidacloprid; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Expiration/
                   Commodity                     Parts per    revocation
                                                  million        date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                * * * * *
Soybean, meal.................................          4.0         None
Soybean, seed.................................          1.0         None
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 05-13370 Filed 7-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.