Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 39989-39990 [05-13598]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 12, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: The American Community
Survey Content Test.
Form Number(s): ACS–1(X)C6.
Agency Approval Number: None.
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden: 56,933 hours.
Number of Respondents: 62,900.
Avg Hours Per Response:
Questionnaire—40 min.; Content
Reinterview—30 min.
Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census
Bureau requests authorization from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to conduct the American
Community Survey Content Test. Given
the rapid demographic changes
experienced in recent years and the
strong expectation that such changes
will continue and accelerate, the oncea-decade data collection approach of a
decennial census is no longer acceptable
as a source for the housing and socioeconomic data collected on the Census
Long-Form. To meet the needs and
expectations of the country, the Census
Bureau developed the American
Community Survey (ACS). This survey
collects long-form data every month and
provide tabulations of these data on a
yearly basis. In the past, the long-form
data were collected only at the time of
each decennial census. The ACS allows
the Census Bureau to remove the long
form from the 2010 Census, thus
reducing operational risks, improving
accuracy, and providing more relevant
data.
Full implementation of the ACS in
2005 includes an annual sample of
approximately three million residential
addresses a year in the 50 states and
District of Columbia and another 36,000
residential addresses in Puerto Rico
each year. While this large sample of
addresses permits production of single
year estimates for areas with a
population of 65,000 or more, estimates
at lower levels of geography require
aggregates of three and five years’ worth
of data. The year 2008 is the first year
for changes to the ACS content since the
2003 data collection year. From 2008
through 2012, it is important that the
content of the ACS questions remain
consistent for the three and five year
aggregated data estimates that the ACS
will be able to produce. Data from year
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Jul 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
2008 mark the first year of three year
aggregated data including the year of the
next decennial census in 2010.
Similarly, 2008 will serve as the starting
year for the five year aggregated data
that includes 2010 (2008–2012). Given
the significance of the year 2008, the
ACS has committed to a research
program during 2006 that will result in
final content determination in time for
the 2008 ACS. This research is the 2006
ACS Content Test. The 2006 ACS
Content Test will address three primary
research questions:
1. Per specific content areas, can
changes to question wording, response
categories, and redefinition of
underlying constructs improve the
quality of the collected data?
2. Do changes in the layout of the mail
form necessary to accommodate the
modified content impact response at a
unit or item level?
3. What are the cost implications of a
change in form design due to census
short form questions in conjunction
with ACS question changes?
The Content Test will include a
national sample field test with 62,900
residential addresses. About half of the
sample will serve as the test panel for
the content; the other half will serve as
the control panel and contain the
current content of the 2005 ACS, plus
three new content items included for
the first time as part of the ACS Content
Test. The three new topics are:
• Marital history (up to 3 new
questions per person, depending on skip
patterns)
• Health insurance (up to 2 new
questions per person, depending on skip
patterns)
• Service connected disability (up to
2 new questions, depending on skip
patterns) Both the control and test
versions will include these new items to
keep context and questionnaire length
consistent between the two versions.
These topics are included for testing
on the Content Test, but the 2008 ACS
may or may not include them. Only
those topics for which Congress
approves the legislation will be eligible
for the 2008 ACS.
The ACS Content Test will include a
Content Reinterview, conducted via
CATI, as a method to measure response
error. Along with other data quality
measures, such as item non-response
rates, measures of distributional changes
and so on, simple response variance and
gross difference rates will serve as
indicators of the quality of the test
questions relative to the current
versions of the ACS questions.
Final content recommendations, an
analysis of the data collected as part of
the content test, including the Content
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39989
Reinterview data, will guide the
selection of the version of the questions
that yield the highest quality data.
Census Bureau analysts, subject matter
experts, and experts from the other
participating federal agencies will work
together to determine the final question
content based on the results of the test.
The end product will reflect final
content recommendation based on input
from all participants. The final approval
of these recommendations is expected
in the early part of January 2007, so that
the Census Bureau can implement all
the necessary changes to the existing
ACS data collection materials (e.g.,
questionnaires, CATI/CAPI instruments,
questionnaire instruction booklet,
interviewer training materials, etc.) to
reflect the final recommended
questions/content in time for
implementation of the 2008 ACS.
The American Community Survey
itself provides data comparable to the
decennial census long form, at a census
tract level. Federal agencies use ACS to
determine appropriate funding for states
and local governments through block
grants. State and local governments use
ACS data for program planning,
administration and evaluation. Thus the
quality of the ACS data directly impact
the success of federal, state and local
government programs.
The objective of the 2006 ACS
Content Test is to improve the quality
of ACS data. Every step we take to
improve the quality of the data further
improves planning, administration and
evaluation of the government programs
that rely on ACS data. The Content Test
provides the vehicle for improving the
quality of the ACS data.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: One-time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.,
Sections 141, 193, and 221.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter,
(202) 395–5103.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk
Officer either by fax (202–395–7245) or
e-mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
39990
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 12, 2005 / Notices
Dated: July 6, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–13598 Filed 7–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance of the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13.
Bureau: International Trade
Administration.
Title: Mission/Exhibition Evaluation.
Agency Form Number: ITA–4075P.
OMB Number: 0625–0034.
Type of Request: Regular submission.
Burden: 167 hours.
Number of Respondents: 2,000.
Avg. Hours Per Response: 5 minutes.
Needs and Uses: U.S. Department of
Commerce (DOC) and DOC-certified
trade missions and exhibitions are
overseas events planned, organized and
led by government and non-government
export promotion agencies such as
industry trade associations, agencies of
Federal, state and local governments;
chambers of commerce; regional
consortia; and other export oriented
groups. This form is used to: (1)
Evaluate the effectiveness of DOC or
DOC-certified overseas trade events
through the collection of information
relating to required performance
measures; (2) document the results of
participation in DOC trade events; (3)
evaluate results reported by small to
mid-sized, new-to-exports/new-tomarket U.S. companies; (4) document
the successful completion of trade
promotion activities conducted by
overseas DOC offices; and (5) identify
strengths and weaknesses of DOC trade
promotion programs in the interest of
improving service to the U.S. business
community. This request is being
submitted to extend OMB authority for
this information collection form to
enable participants to continue to
address whether or not their overall
objective(s) were met by participating in
a particular trade mission or exhibition.
Affected Public: Business or other for
profit, not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit, voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–7340.
Copies of the above information
collection can be obtained by calling or
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Jul 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
writing Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6612,
14th & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. Phone Number:
(202) 482–3129. E-mail:
dHynek@doc.gov.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent to
David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer,
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax
(202) 395–7285, within 30 days of the
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Dated: July 6, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–13596 Filed 7–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13.
Bureau: International Trade
Administration.
Title: Application for an Export Trade
Certificate of Review.
Agency Form Number: ITA–4093P.
OMB Number: 0625–0125.
Type of Request: Regular submission.
Burden: 384 hours.
Number of Respondents: 12.
Avg. Hours Per Response: 32 hours.
Needs and Uses: Title III of the Export
Trading Company Act of 1982 (Pub. L.
97–290, 96 Stat. 1233–1247), requires
the Department of Commerce to
establish a program to evaluate
applications for an Export Trade
Certificates of Review (antitrust
preclearance for joint export related
activities), and with the concurrence of
the Department of Justice, issue such
certificates where the requirements of
the Act are satisfied. The Act requires
that Commerce and Justice conduct
economic and legal antitrust analyses
prior to the issuance of a certificate. The
collection of information is necessary to
conduct the required economic and
legal antitrust analyses. Without the
information, there could be no basis
upon which a certificate could be
issued.
In the Department of Commerce, the
economic and legal analyses are
performed by the Office of Export
Trading Company Affairs and the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the General Counsel, respectively.
The Department of Justice analyses will
be conducted by its Antitrust Division.
The purpose of such analyses is to make
a determination as to whether or not to
issue an Export Trade Certificate of
Review. A certificate provides its holder
and the members named in the
certificate (a) immunity from
government actions under state and
Federal antitrust laws for the export
conduct specified in the certificate; (b)
some protection from frivolous private
suits by limiting their liability in private
actions from treble to actual damages
when the challenged activities are
covered by an Export Certificate of
Review. Title III was enacted to reduce
uncertainty regarding application of
U.S. antitrust laws to export activitiesespecially those involving actions by
domestic competitors. Application for
an export trade certificate of review is
voluntary.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit, not-for-profit institutions,
state, local or tribal Government.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit, voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–7340.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6612, 14th and
Constitution, NW., Washington, DC
20230. E-mail: dHynek@doc.gov.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent to
David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer,
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax
(202) 395–7285 within 30 days of the
publication of this notice.
Dated: July 6, 2005.
Madeline Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–13597 Filed 7–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–274–804]
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Carbon
and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From
Trinidad and Tobago
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39989-39990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13598]
[[Page 39989]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: The American Community Survey Content Test.
Form Number(s): ACS-1(X)C6.
Agency Approval Number: None.
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden: 56,933 hours.
Number of Respondents: 62,900.
Avg Hours Per Response: Questionnaire--40 min.; Content
Reinterview--30 min.
Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census Bureau requests authorization from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to conduct the American
Community Survey Content Test. Given the rapid demographic changes
experienced in recent years and the strong expectation that such
changes will continue and accelerate, the once-a-decade data collection
approach of a decennial census is no longer acceptable as a source for
the housing and socio-economic data collected on the Census Long-Form.
To meet the needs and expectations of the country, the Census Bureau
developed the American Community Survey (ACS). This survey collects
long-form data every month and provide tabulations of these data on a
yearly basis. In the past, the long-form data were collected only at
the time of each decennial census. The ACS allows the Census Bureau to
remove the long form from the 2010 Census, thus reducing operational
risks, improving accuracy, and providing more relevant data.
Full implementation of the ACS in 2005 includes an annual sample of
approximately three million residential addresses a year in the 50
states and District of Columbia and another 36,000 residential
addresses in Puerto Rico each year. While this large sample of
addresses permits production of single year estimates for areas with a
population of 65,000 or more, estimates at lower levels of geography
require aggregates of three and five years' worth of data. The year
2008 is the first year for changes to the ACS content since the 2003
data collection year. From 2008 through 2012, it is important that the
content of the ACS questions remain consistent for the three and five
year aggregated data estimates that the ACS will be able to produce.
Data from year 2008 mark the first year of three year aggregated data
including the year of the next decennial census in 2010. Similarly,
2008 will serve as the starting year for the five year aggregated data
that includes 2010 (2008-2012). Given the significance of the year
2008, the ACS has committed to a research program during 2006 that will
result in final content determination in time for the 2008 ACS. This
research is the 2006 ACS Content Test. The 2006 ACS Content Test will
address three primary research questions:
1. Per specific content areas, can changes to question wording,
response categories, and redefinition of underlying constructs improve
the quality of the collected data?
2. Do changes in the layout of the mail form necessary to
accommodate the modified content impact response at a unit or item
level?
3. What are the cost implications of a change in form design due to
census short form questions in conjunction with ACS question changes?
The Content Test will include a national sample field test with
62,900 residential addresses. About half of the sample will serve as
the test panel for the content; the other half will serve as the
control panel and contain the current content of the 2005 ACS, plus
three new content items included for the first time as part of the ACS
Content Test. The three new topics are:
Marital history (up to 3 new questions per person,
depending on skip patterns)
Health insurance (up to 2 new questions per person,
depending on skip patterns)
Service connected disability (up to 2 new questions,
depending on skip patterns) Both the control and test versions will
include these new items to keep context and questionnaire length
consistent between the two versions.
These topics are included for testing on the Content Test, but the
2008 ACS may or may not include them. Only those topics for which
Congress approves the legislation will be eligible for the 2008 ACS.
The ACS Content Test will include a Content Reinterview, conducted
via CATI, as a method to measure response error. Along with other data
quality measures, such as item non-response rates, measures of
distributional changes and so on, simple response variance and gross
difference rates will serve as indicators of the quality of the test
questions relative to the current versions of the ACS questions.
Final content recommendations, an analysis of the data collected as
part of the content test, including the Content Reinterview data, will
guide the selection of the version of the questions that yield the
highest quality data. Census Bureau analysts, subject matter experts,
and experts from the other participating federal agencies will work
together to determine the final question content based on the results
of the test. The end product will reflect final content recommendation
based on input from all participants. The final approval of these
recommendations is expected in the early part of January 2007, so that
the Census Bureau can implement all the necessary changes to the
existing ACS data collection materials (e.g., questionnaires, CATI/CAPI
instruments, questionnaire instruction booklet, interviewer training
materials, etc.) to reflect the final recommended questions/content in
time for implementation of the 2008 ACS.
The American Community Survey itself provides data comparable to
the decennial census long form, at a census tract level. Federal
agencies use ACS to determine appropriate funding for states and local
governments through block grants. State and local governments use ACS
data for program planning, administration and evaluation. Thus the
quality of the ACS data directly impact the success of federal, state
and local government programs.
The objective of the 2006 ACS Content Test is to improve the
quality of ACS data. Every step we take to improve the quality of the
data further improves planning, administration and evaluation of the
government programs that rely on ACS data. The Content Test provides
the vehicle for improving the quality of the ACS data.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Frequency: One-time.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Sections 141, 193, and 221.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter, (202) 395-5103.
Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk Officer either by fax (202-395-7245) or e-
mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
[[Page 39990]]
Dated: July 6, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-13598 Filed 7-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P