Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Prospect Bay, Kent Island Narrows, MD, 39654-39656 [05-13577]
Download as PDF
39654
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
The final regulation relates to the
definition of liabilities under section
752 of the Internal Revenue Code.
DATES: This correction is effective on
May 26, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Fields (202) 622–3050 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final regulations (TD 9207) that
are the subject of this correction are
under sections 358, 704, 705, 737 and
752 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, TD 9207 contains an
error that may prove to be misleading
and is in need of clarification.
List of Subject in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 1 is corrected
by making the following correcting
amendment:
I
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read, in part, as
follows:
I
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
In § 1.752–7(g)(5), paragraph (iii) of the
Example, the table is revised as follows:
I
§ 1.752–7 Partnership assumption of
partner’s § 1.752–7 liability on or after June
24, 2003.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(5) Examples (i) * * *
(iii) * * *
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–074]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Prospect Bay, Kent Island
Narrows, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing temporary special local
regulations during the ‘‘Thunder on the
Narrows’’ boat races, a marine event to
be held August 6 and August 7, 2005,
on the waters of Prospect Bay, near Kent
Island Narrows, Maryland. These
special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of Prospect Bay
during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:30
a.m. on August 6, 2005, through 6:30
p.m. on August 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD05–05–
074 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (oax), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald Houck, Marine Events
Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576–2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
[In millions]
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) the
1. Basis in Property 1 after distribution
$3 Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
2. Plus lesser of remaining built-in loss.
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing
($2) or amount paid to satisfy lian NPRM would be contrary to public
ability ($1) ................................
1 interest. The event will begin on August
6, 2005. Because of the danger posed by
3. Basis in Property 1 after satisfaction
high-speed powerboats racing in a
of liability ...........................................
$4
closed circuit, special local regulations
are necessary to provide for the safety of
*
*
*
*
*
event participants, spectator craft and
Cynthia Grigsby,
other vessels transiting the event area.
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations
For the safety concerns noted, it is in
Branch, Legal Processing Division Associate
the public interest to have these
Chief Counsel (Procedure and
regulations in effect during the event.
Administration).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
[FR Doc. 05–13585 Filed 7–8–05; 8:45 am]
Guard finds that good cause exists for
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
making this rule effective less than 30
B’S BASIS IN PROPERTY 1 AFTER
SATISFACTION OF LIABILITY
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:58 Jul 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the event
participants, spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area in
Prospect Bay. However, advance
notifications will be made to affected
users of the river via marine information
broadcasts and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On August 6 and August 7, 2005, the
Kent Narrows Racing Association will
sponsor the ‘‘Thunder on the Narrows’’
powerboat races, on Prospect Bay, near
Kent Island Narrows, Maryland. The
event will consist of approximately 75
hydroplanes and jersey speed skiffs
racing in heats counter-clockwise
around an oval racecourse. A large fleet
of spectator vessels is anticipated. Due
to the need for vessel control during the
races, vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of Prospect Bay near
Kent Island Narrows, Maryland. The
temporary special local regulations will
be enforced from 10:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
on August 6, and August 7, 2005. If the
races are postponed due to weather,
then the temporary special local
regulations will be enforced during the
same time period the next day. The
effect of the temporary special local
regulations will be to restrict general
navigation in the regulated area during
the races. Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
Non-participating vessels will be
allowed to transit the regulated area
between races, when the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander determines it is safe
to do so. These regulations are needed
to control vessel traffic during the event
to enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this temporary final rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents
traffic from transiting a portion of
Prospect Bay during the event, the effect
of this regulation will not be significant
due to the limited duration that the
regulated area will be in effect and the
extensive advance notifications that will
be made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcasts and area
newspapers so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the effected portion of Prospect Bay
during the event.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in
effect for only a short period. The Patrol
Commander will allow nonparticipating vessels to transit the event
area between races. Before the
enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
the address listed under ADDRESSES.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:58 Jul 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39655
will not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
and direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
39656
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under those
sections. Under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10:30 a.m. to 6:30
p.m. on August 6 and August 7, 2005.
If the races are postponed due to
weather, then the temporary special
local regulations will be enforced during
the same time period the next day.
Dated: June 26, 2005.
Sally Brice-O’Hara,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–13577 Filed 7–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 100.35-T05–074
to read as follows:
I
[CGD05–05–066]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Pamlico River, Washington,
NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
§ 100.35–T05–074 Prospect Bay, Kent
Island Narrows, MD.
ACTION:
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established for the waters of Prospect
Bay, adjacent to Kent Island Narrows,
Maryland, enclosed by a line drawn
between the following points: latitude
38°57′52″ N, longitude 076°14′48″ W,
thence southwesterly to latitude
38°58′02″ N, longitude 076°15′05″ W,
thence southeasterly to latitude
38°57′38″ N, longitude 076°15′29″ W,
thence northeasterly to latitude
38°57′28″ N, longitude 076°15′23″ W,
thence to point of origin. All
coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(c) Special local regulations: (1)
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the regulated area.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing temporary special local
regulations for the ‘‘SBIP—Fountain
Powerboats Kilo Run and Super Boat
Grand Prix’’, a marine event to be held
August 5 and August 7, 2005, on the
waters of the Pamlico River, near
Washington, North Carolina. These
special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the Pamlico River
during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30
a.m. on August 5, 2005 through 5 p.m.
on August 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD05–05–
066 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (oax), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
D.M. Sens, Project Manager, Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:58 Jul 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (B) the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing
an NPRM would be impracticable and
contrary to public interest. The event
will begin on August 5, 2005. Because
of the danger posed by high-speed
powerboats racing in a closed circuit,
special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of event
participants, spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area. For the
safety concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have these regulations in
effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) (3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the event
participants, spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area in the
Pamlico River. However, advance
notifications will be made to affected
users of the river via marine information
broadcasts and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On August 5 and August 7, 2005,
Super Boat International Productions
will sponsor the ‘‘SBIP—Fountain
Powerboats Kilo Run and Super Boat
Grand Prix’’, on the Pamlico River, near
Washington, North Carolina. The event
will consist of approximately 40 highspeed powerboats racing in heats along
a 5-mile oval course on August 5 and 7,
2005. Preliminary speed trials along a
straight one-kilometer course will be
conducted on August 5, 2005.
Approximately 20 boats will participate
in the speed trials. Approximately 100
spectator vessels will gather nearby to
view the speed trials and the race. If
either the speed trials or races are
postponed due to weather, they will be
held the next day. During the speed
trials and the races, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted to provide for the
safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of the Pamlico River
near Washington, North Carolina. The
temporary special local regulations will
be enforced from 6:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
on August 5, 2005, and from 11:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on August 7, 2005. If either the
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39654-39656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13577]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-05-074]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Prospect Bay, Kent
Island Narrows, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing temporary special local
regulations during the ``Thunder on the Narrows'' boat races, a marine
event to be held August 6 and August 7, 2005, on the waters of Prospect
Bay, near Kent Island Narrows, Maryland. These special local
regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic in portions of Prospect Bay during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:30 a.m. on August 6, 2005,
through 6:30 p.m. on August 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket CGD05-05-074 and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (oax), Fifth Coast Guard District,
431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004, between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Houck, Marine Events
Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576-
2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM would be
contrary to public interest. The event will begin on August 6, 2005.
Because of the danger posed by high-speed powerboats racing in a closed
circuit, special local regulations are necessary to provide for the
safety of event participants, spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. For the safety concerns noted, it is in the
public interest to have these regulations in effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the event participants, spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area in Prospect Bay. However, advance
notifications will be made to affected users of the river via marine
information broadcasts and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On August 6 and August 7, 2005, the Kent Narrows Racing Association
will sponsor the ``Thunder on the Narrows'' powerboat races, on
Prospect Bay, near Kent Island Narrows, Maryland. The event will
consist of approximately 75 hydroplanes and jersey speed skiffs racing
in heats counter-clockwise around an oval racecourse. A large fleet of
spectator vessels is anticipated. Due to the need for vessel control
during the races, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted to
provide for the safety of participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing temporary special local regulations
on specified waters of Prospect Bay near Kent Island Narrows, Maryland.
The temporary special local regulations will be enforced from 10:30
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on August 6, and August 7, 2005. If the races are
postponed due to weather, then the temporary special local regulations
will be enforced during the same time period the next day. The effect
of the temporary special local regulations will be to restrict general
navigation in the regulated area during the races. Except for persons
or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area. Non-participating
vessels will be allowed to transit the regulated area between races,
when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines it is safe to do so.
These regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event
to enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
[[Page 39655]]
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this temporary final rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of Prospect Bay during the event, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area
will be in effect and the extensive advance notifications that will be
made to the maritime community via marine information broadcasts and
area newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the effected portion of Prospect Bay during the
event.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect for only a short period. The Patrol Commander
will allow non-participating vessels to transit the event area between
races. Before the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories
so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial and direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of
[[Page 39656]]
a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade permit are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under those sections. Under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an ``Environmental Analysis
Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add a temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-074 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-074 Prospect Bay, Kent Island Narrows, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area is established for the
waters of Prospect Bay, adjacent to Kent Island Narrows, Maryland,
enclosed by a line drawn between the following points: latitude
38[deg]57'52'' N, longitude 076[deg]14'48'' W, thence southwesterly to
latitude 38[deg]58'02'' N, longitude 076[deg]15'05'' W, thence
southeasterly to latitude 38[deg]57'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]15'29''
W, thence northeasterly to latitude 38[deg]57'28'' N, longitude
076[deg]15'23'' W, thence to point of origin. All coordinates reference
Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 10:30
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on August 6 and August 7, 2005. If the races are
postponed due to weather, then the temporary special local regulations
will be enforced during the same time period the next day.
Dated: June 26, 2005.
Sally Brice-O'Hara,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-13577 Filed 7-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P