Technical and Clarifying Amendments to Rules for Exempt Markets, Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities and Designated Contract Markets, and Procedural Changes for Derivatives Clearing Organization Registration Applications, 39672-39689 [05-13467]

Download as PDF 39672 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules Subpart D—Non-Fee Based SBASponsored Activity § 106.400 Activity. Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored designated legal counsel, has authority to approve and sign each Non-Fee Based Record. Subpart E—Gifts The Administrator (or designee) may provide assistance directly to small business concerns through Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities under section 8(b)(1)(A) of the Small Business Act. § 106.500 What is SBA’s Gift authority? This section covers SBA’s Gift acceptance authority under sections 4(g), 8(b)(1)(G), 5(b)(9) and 7(k)(2) of the Small Business Act. § 106.401 What are the minimum requirements applicable to a Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities? § 106.501 What minimum requirements are applicable to SBA’s solicitation and/or acceptance of Gifts? While SBA may subject Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities to additional requirements through internal policy and procedure, the following requirements apply to all Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity: (a) A Non-Fee Based Record must be prepared and approved by the Responsible Program Official in advance of the activity; (b) Gifts of cash accepted for Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities are subject to § 106.500, internal SBA policies and procedures as well as applicable U.S. Treasury rules and guidelines; and (c) Written approval must be obtained as outlined in § 106.403. While SBA may subject the solicitation and/or acceptance of Gifts to additional requirements through internal policy and procedure, the following requirements must apply to all Gift solicitations and/or acceptances under the authority of the Small Business Act sections cited in § 106.500: (a) SBA is required to use the Gift (whether cash or in-kind) in a manner consistent with the original purpose of the Gift; (b) There must be written documentation of each Gift solicitation and/or acceptance signed by an authorized SBA official; (c) Any Gift solicited and/or accepted must undergo a determination, prior to solicitation of the Gift or prior to acceptance of the Gift if unsolicited, of whether a conflict of interest exists between the Donor and SBA; and (d) All cash Gifts donated to SBA under the authority cited in § 106.500 must be deposited in an SBA trust account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. § 106.402 What provisions must be set forth in a Non-Fee Based Record? A Non-Fee Based Record must contain the following: (a) A narrative description of the NonFee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity; (b) A certification by the Responsible Program Official that he or she will abide by the requirements contained in this part, as well as all other applicable statutes, regulations, policies and procedures for Non-Fee Based SBASponsored Activities; (c) If applicable, a list of Donors supporting the activity; and (d) With regard to any donations made in support of a Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity, the Non-Fee Based Record will reflect the following: (1) SBA will not unnecessarily promote a Donor, or the Donor’s products or services; (2) Each Donor may receive appropriate recognition for its Gift; and (3) Any printed or electronically generated material recognizing a Donor will include a prominent disclaimer stating that the acceptance of the Gift does not constitute or imply an endorsement by SBA of the Donor, or the Donor’s products or services. § 106.403 Who has the authority to approve and sign a Non-Fee Based Record? The appropriate Responsible Program Official, after consultation with the VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 § 106.502 Who has authority to perform a Gift conflict of interest determination? (a) For Gifts solicited and/or accepted under sections 4(g), 8(b)(1)(G), and 7(k)(2) of the Small Business Act, the General Counsel, or designee, must make the final conflict of interest determination. No Gift shall be solicited and/or accepted under these sections of the Small Business Act if such solicitation and/or acceptance would, in the determination of the General Counsel (or designee), create a conflict of interest. (b) For Gifts of services and facilities solicited and/or accepted under section 5(b)(9), the conflict of interest determination may be made by designated disaster legal counsel. § 106.503 Are there types of Gifts which SBA may not solicit and/or accept? Yes. SBA shall not solicit and/or accept Gifts of or for (or use cash Gifts to purchase or engage in) the following: (a) Alcohol products; (b) Tobacco products; PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (c) Pornographic or sexually explicit objects or services; (d) Gambling (including raffles and lotteries); (e) Parties primarily for the benefit of Government employees; and (f) Any other product or service prohibited by law or policy. Dated: June 29, 2005. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator. [FR Doc. 05–13508 Filed 7–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025–01–P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 17 CFR Parts 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40 Technical and Clarifying Amendments to Rules for Exempt Markets, Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities and Designated Contract Markets, and Procedural Changes for Derivatives Clearing Organization Registration Applications Commodity Futures Trading Commission. ACTION: Proposed rules. AGENCY: SUMMARY: On August 10, 2001, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’) published final rules implementing the provisions of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (‘‘CFMA’’) relating to trading facilities.1 The amendments proposed herein are intended to clarify and codify acceptable practices under the rules for trading facilities, based on the Commission’s experience over the intervening four years in applying those rules, including the adoption of several amendments to the original rules over the same period. The proposed amendments also would make various technical corrections and conforming amendments to the rules. In addition, the proposed amendments would revise the application and review process for registration as a derivatives clearing organization (‘‘DCO’’) by eliminating the presumption of automatic fast-track review of applications and replacing it with the presumption that all applications will be reviewed pursuant to the 180-day timeframe and procedures specified in section 6(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’ or ‘‘Act’’). In lieu of the current 60-day automatic fast-track review, the Commission is proposing to permit applicants to request expedited review 1 66 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM FR 42256, August 10, 2001. 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules and to be registered as a DCO by affirmative Commission action not later than 90 days after the Commission receives the application. DATES: Comments must be received by September 9, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, attention: Office of the Secretariat. Comments may be sent by facsimile transmission to 202–418–5521 or, by e-mail to secretary@cftc.gov. Reference should be made to ‘‘Proposed Clarifying Amendments for Exempt Markets, Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities and Designated Contract Markets, and Procedural Changes for Derivatives Clearing Organization Registration Applications.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Heitman, Senior Special Counsel (telephone 202–418–5041, email dheitman@cftc.gov), Division of Market Oversight, or Lois Gregory, Special Counsel (telephone 202–418– 5521, e-mail lgregory@cftc.gov), Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The CFMA amended the Commodity Exchange Act (the ‘‘Act’’) to profoundly alter federal regulation of commodity futures and option markets. The new statutory framework created by the CFMA established two categories of markets subject to Commission regulatory oversight, designated contract markets (‘‘DCMs’’) and registered derivatives transaction execution facilities (‘‘DTEFs’’), and two categories of exempt markets, exempt boards of trade (‘‘EBOTs’’) and exempt commercial markets (‘‘ECMs’’). The original rules applicable to these trading facilities 2 established administrative procedures necessary to implement the CFMA, interpreted certain of the CFMA’s provisions, and provided guidance on compliance with various of the CFMA’s requirements. In addition, the Commission, under the general exemptive authority of section 4(c) of the Act, in a limited number of instances provided relief from, or greater flexibility than, the CFMA’s provisions. In addition, over the four years during which these new rules for trading 2 Id. VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 facilities have been in effect, they have been amended several times.3 The amendments proposed herein are intended to clarify and codify acceptable practices under the Commission’s rules for trading facilities, as amended, based on the Commission’s experience in applying those rules over the last four years. The proposed amendments also would make a number of technical and clarifying corrections and conforming amendments to enhance the consistency and clarity of the rules. It should also be noted that the Commission has provided information that may be helpful to those subject to the rules for trading facilities on its Web site at https://www.cftc.gov. In particular, the website includes charts setting out information that may be helpful in: (1) Complying with the registration criteria as a DTEF (see Appendix A to part 37); (2) complying with the designation criteria as a DCM (see Appendix A to part 38); and (3) complying with the requirements for designation of physical delivery futures contracts (see Appendix A to part 40—Guideline No. 1). While these charts are not intended to be used as mandatory checklists, they may provide helpful guidance to those subject to the regulations governing trading facilities. In addition, the Commission is proposing to revise the application and review procedures for registration as a DCO. Specifically, the Commission is proposing to eliminate the presumption of automatic fast-track review of applications and replace it with the presumption that all applications will be reviewed pursuant to the 180-day timeframe and procedures specified in section 6(a) of the Act. In lieu of the automatic fast-track review (under which applicants were deemed to be registered as DCOs 60 days after receipt of an application), the Commission is proposing to permit applicants to request expedited review and to be registered as a DCO by the Commission not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the application. The Commission is also proposing, among other things, to provide that review 3 See, for example: Regulation To Restrict Dual Trading in Security Futures Products, 67 FR 11223 (March 15, 2002); Changes in Divisional Structure and Delegations of Authority, 67 FR 62350 (October 7, 2002); Amendments to New Regulatory Framework for Trading Facilities and Clearing Organizations, 67 FR 62873 (October 9, 2002); Exempt Commercial Markets, 69 FR 43285 (July 20, 2004); Confidential Information and Commission Records and Information, 69 FR 67503 (November 18, 2004); and Application Procedures for Registration as a Derivatives Transaction Execution Facility or Designation as a Contract Market, 69 FR 67811 (November 22, 2004). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39673 under the expedited review procedures may be terminated if it appears that the application is materially incomplete, raises novel or complex issues that require additional time for review, or has undergone substantive amendment or supplementation during the review period. The Commission is proposing these amendments based upon its experience in processing applications and in light of administrative practices that have been implemented since the rules were first adopted. These amendments would establish procedures substantially similar, where appropriate, to those recently amended in parts 37 and 38 for processing applications for registration of derivatives transaction execution facilities and contract market designation, respectively.4 II. The Proposed Amendments A. Part 36—Exempt Markets Sections 36.2(b) and 36.3(a) would be amended by deleting the reference to ‘‘hard copy’’ in the provisions requiring trading facilities operating as EBOTs and ECMs, respectively, to notify the Commission. In order to simplify and modernize the notification process, the amended rules would require that such notifications may only be filed electronically. Similar amendments are proposed in other sections requiring notifications or filings with the Commission, so that under the amended rules, all formal filings from ECMs, EBOTs, DTEFs, DCMs and DCOs must be filed electronically. Section 36.2(c)(2), relating to market data dissemination for EBOTs, would be revised. Sections 2(h)(4)(D) and 5d(d) of the Act include similar language requiring ECMs and EBOTs, respectively, to daily disseminate certain basic trading information in the event either market becomes a significant source of price discovery for the underlying cash market for any commodity traded on the ECM or EBOT. The previously noted amendments to the rules applicable to ECMs 5 established clear procedures for ECMs to follow in complying with the price discovery/price dissemination requirement, by: (1) Providing criteria for making a price discovery determination; (2) requiring ECMs that meet those criteria and thus are performing a price discovery function to inform the Commission; (3) establishing procedures for the Commission to make a formal price discovery determination; (4) setting out the types of information 4 69 5 69 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM FR 67811, November 22, 2004. FR 43285 (July 20, 2004). 11JYP1 39674 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules an ECM that serves a price discovery function must disseminate; and (5) establishing procedures for modifying a price discovery determination. The proposed rules would amend § 36.2(c)(2) to implement price discovery/price dissemination rules for EBOTs that closely parallel the price discovery/price dissemination rules currently applicable to ECMs. The wording of the Act’s price discovery/ price dissemination provision for EBOTs is substantially similar, although not identical, to the provision applicable to ECMs. However, both provisions are identical in their ultimate purpose. Furthermore, the regulatory provision applicable to ECMs has recently gone through the public comment process. Finally, parallel provisions would be easier for the industry to apply, since the price discovery/price dissemination rules would be essentially identical for both types of exempt markets. The proposed rules would also add new §§ 36.2(c)(3) and 36.3(c)(4) requiring EBOTs and ECMs, respectively, to annually file a notice with the Commission, no later than the end of each calendar year. The notice must include a statement that the entity continues to operate under the exemption and a certification that the information in its original notification of operation is still correct. Annual notification of operation by the facility would allow the Commission to track whether facilities that notified the Commission of their intent to operate actually commenced operations and would allow the Commission to eliminate inactive facilities from any listing of active EBOTs or ECMs maintained on its Web site. B. Part 37—Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities Section 37.1(a) would be amended to make clear that the provisions of Part 37 apply not only to boards of trade operating as registered DTEFs, but also to applicants for registration as DTEFs. Section 37.2 would be revised to identify certain reserved provisions of the Commission’s regulations that specifically and comprehensively reference DTEFs separately from other reserved provisions that do not. The proposed revisions also would make clear that all the references in § 37.2 to reserved provisions of the regulations applicable to DTEFs also include related definitions and cross-referenced sections cited in those reserved provisions. Finally, § 1.60 would be added to the list of reserved provisions of the regulations applicable to DTEFs under § 37.2 to make clear that DTEFs VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 need to notify the Commission of any material legal proceeding to which the DTEF is a party or to which its property or assets are subject. In § 37.3, subparagraph (a)(5) would be renumbered as subparagraph (b) and the remaining subparagraphs would be renumbered accordingly. Section 37.6, Compliance with Core Principles, would be revised to harmonize DTEF core principle compliance with the previously noted new application procedures for DCMs and DTEFs.6 New § 37.6(c)(2) would be added delegating to the Division of Market Oversight (the ‘‘Division’’) the authority under § 37.6(c)(1) to request additional information in reviewing a DTEF’s continued compliance with one or more core principles, or to enable the Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act. The delegation provision notes that the Commission, at its election, may exercise the delegated authority directly. A similar delegation would be made in new § 38.5(c) to allow the Division to request additional information in reviewing a DCM’s continued compliance with designation criteria and core principles, or to enable the Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act. The foregoing delegated authority would also extend to other requests by Commission staff to DTEFs or DCMs for additional information: (1) Under new § 40.2(b), regarding compliance with respect to new products listed by certification; (2) under § 40.3(a)(9), regarding voluntary submission of new products for Commission review and approval; and (3) under new § 40.6(a)(4), regarding compliance with respect to self-certified rules. This delegated authority would aid the staff in reviewing DTEF and DCM compliance with the requirements of the Act or Commission regulations or policies thereunder without involving the Commission in the mechanics of day-to-day due diligence oversight. In addition, the guidance in current § 37.6(d) would be deleted as duplicative of ‘‘Appendix B to Part 37— Guidance on Compliance with Core Principles’’ and would be replaced with a reference to Appendix B. Section 37.8(b), regarding special calls for information, would be amended to make clear that the section applies not only to futures commission merchants, but to foreign brokers (as defined in § 15.00) as well. The title of Appendix A to part 37 would be reworded to read, ‘‘Appendix A to part 37—Guidance on Compliance with Registration Criteria,’’ to be PO 00000 6 69 FR 67811 (November 22, 2004). Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 consistent with the wording of the titles of the other appendices to parts 37 and 38. The introductory paragraph of the appendix also would be revised to make clear that registration criteria guidance applies both to new registrants that register by application and to DTEFs operated by DCMs, which would not need to file an application, but could become registered by notification/ certification. The revised language also is consistent with the requirement that the registration criteria must be met initially and on an ongoing basis, rather than just upon application. In Appendix B to part 37, subsection 1 of the appendix would be revised to make clear that the guidance therein applies to all registered DTEFs, whether they come in by notification under § 37.5(a) or by application. Subsection 3 of the appendix would be revised to make clear that, consistent with § 37.6(b)(2), the guidance therein applies to applicants for registration, rather than registered DTEFs. Core Principle 5 of Appendix B to part 37, ‘‘Daily Publication of Trading Information,’’ would be revised in a manner consistent with the price discovery/price dissemination provisions applicable to EBOTs and ECMs, which are not as comprehensive as those applicable to DCMs. This reflects the fact that DTEFs are subject to a different informational standard than DCMs. DCMs are subject to a blanket requirement, under Core Principle 8 of Appendix B to part 38, to publish daily trading information for all actively traded contracts. DTEFs, however, are subject to Core Principle 5 (section 5a(d)(5) of the Act), which includes language similar to that applicable to EBOTs and ECMs (under sections 5d(d) and 2(h)(4)(D) of the Act, respectively) requiring DTEFs to make public certain daily trading information only if the Commission determines that contracts traded on the facility perform a significant price discovery function for transactions in the cash market for the commodity underlying the contracts. The revised core principle explanatory language would apply to DTEFs the same standards that would apply to EBOTs and ECMs (see §§ 36.2(b)(2) and 36.3(c)(2), respectively) whereby a DTEF would perform a significant price discovery function if: (1) Cash market bids, offers or transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis; or (2) the market’s prices are routinely disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market transactions. If the E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules Commission has reason to believe that a DTEF may meet either of these standards, or if the facility holds itself out to the public as performing a price discovery function, the Commission will notify the DTEF and provide it with an opportunity for a hearing through the submission of written data, views and arguments. If, after considering all relevant matters, the Commission finds that the DTEF meets the price discovery standards, it will direct the DTEF to publish daily trading information in accordance with the core principle. The information could be published by providing it to a financial information service or by placing it on the facility’s website. The information should be made available to the public without charge no later than the business day following the day to which the information pertains. C. Part 38—Designated Contract Markets In § 38.1, language would be added to make clear that the provisions of part 38 apply to applicants for designation as well as to already designated contract markets, and redundant and inapplicable references would be deleted. In § 38.2, language would be added to make clear that the references therein to reserved provisions of the regulations applicable to DCMs also include related definitions and cross-referenced sections cited in those reserved provisions. Similar clarifying amendments, reserving the applicability of related definitions and crossreferenced sections, appear in other sections of the proposal. Also, § 1.60 would be added to the list of reserved provisions of the regulations applicable to DCMs under § 38.2 to make clear that DCMs need to notify the Commission of any material legal proceeding to which the DCM is a party or to which its property or assets are subject. In § 38.5, subparagraph (b) would be amended to make clear that DCMs are required to comply with both the designation criteria and the core principles, initially and on an ongoing basis, and to conform its language to § 37.6(c)(1). As noted in the discussion of new § 37.6(c)(2) above, new § 38.5(c) would be added, delegating to the Division of Market Oversight the authority under § 38.5(b) to request additional information in reviewing a DCM’s continued compliance with designation criteria or core principles, or to enable the Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act. The title of Appendix A to part 38 would be revised to refer to ‘‘Guidance on Compliance with Designation VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 Criteria,’’ and the introductory paragraph of the appendix would be revised in conformity with the revisions to the introductory paragraph of Appendix A to part 37, to make clear that the obligation to comply with the designation criteria applies not just to applicants, but is ongoing. Designation Criterion 7 under Appendix A to part 38 would be updated to provide, consistent with the wording of other provisions regarding designation criteria and core principles, that a DCM ‘‘should’’ (rather than ‘‘may’’) provide information to the public by placing the information on its Web site. In Appendix B to part 38, language would be added in subparagraph (1) to harmonize part 38, Appendices A and B, with part 37, Appendices A and B, consistent with the idea that the obligation to comply with the core principles applies both initially and on an ongoing basis. In subparagraph (2), a reference to ‘‘selected’’ requirements of the core principles would be added to make clear that the enumerated acceptable practices under each core principle are neither the complete nor the exclusive requirements for meeting that core principle. With respect to the completeness issue, the selected requirements in the acceptable practices section of a particular core principle may not address all the requirements necessary for compliance with the core principle. With respect to the exclusivity issue, the acceptable practices that are listed for a particular core principle requirement are for illustrative purposes only and do not state the only means of satisfying the particular requirement they address. There may be other ways of complying with that requirement of the core principle that would also be acceptable. Under Core Principle 2 of Appendix B to part 38, a reference would be added in subparagraph (a)(1) to clarify that a DCM could carry out trade practice surveillance programs through delegation or ‘‘contracting out.’’ A delegation confers upon another the authority to act in the delegating authority’s name. A third party contractor would not act in the DCM’s name, but the DCM would be required to maintain sufficient control over the contractor because it would remain the DCM’s responsibility to assure that the DCM’s obligations under the Act were met.7 Under Core Principle 6 of Appendix B, ‘‘Emergency Authority,’’ the language now appearing under subparagraph (b), 7 See the discussion in 66 FR 42256, at 42266 (August 10, 2001). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39675 ‘‘Acceptable Practices,’’ would be moved to subparagraph (a), ‘‘Application Guidance.’’ This amendment would reflect that the language moved to subparagraph (a) more accurately describes guidance on establishing rules to exercise emergency authority in the first instance, rather than acceptable practices in implementing such rules. Under Core Principle 7 of Appendix B, guidance would be added in subparagraph (b) as to what constitutes ‘‘timely placement’’ of information on a DCM’s Web site. In noting that the DCM’s rulebook should be ‘‘available to the public,’’ the intent of the subparagraph is that the rulebook should be freely accessible to anyone who visits the Web site without the need to register, log in, provide a user name or obtain a password. Core Principle 8 of Appendix B requires that a DCM shall make public daily information on settlement prices, volume, open interest, and opening and closing ranges for actively traded contracts. New language would be added to subparagraph (b), Acceptable Practices, whereby compliance with § 16.01 of the Commission’s regulations, which is mandatory since § 16.01 is one of the sections reserved under § 38.2, would constitute an acceptable practice under Core Principle 8. All currently designated DCMs are in compliance with § 16.01. Under Core Principle 16 of Appendix B, paragraph (a) would be revised to refer to a contract market’s board (rather than the contract market as a whole) in conformity with the language of the core principle. D. Part 39—Derivatives Clearing Organizations The Commission adopted the application procedures specified in Commission Regulation 39.3 8 for organizations applying to be registered as DCOs in 2001 when it first implemented the CFMA.9 These procedures presume that an application will be submitted and reviewed pursuant to a fast-track procedure under which an organization is deemed to be designated as a DCO 60 days after submitting its application,10 unless notified otherwise during the review period. DCO registration procedures are not subject to any statutory deadline under section 6(a) of the Act, which only applies to DCMs and DTEFs. 8 17 CFR 39.3. 66 FR 45604 (August 29, 2001). The CFMA, Appendix E of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763, substantially revised the Commodity Exchange Act (Act or CEA), 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq. 10 17 CFR 39.3(a). 9 See E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39676 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules However, the fast-track review period is substantially shorter than the 180-day review period specified in section 6(a) of the Act for DCMs and DTEFs. The rules provide procedures for terminating the fast-track review, including termination by the Commission if it appears that the application’s form or substance fails to meet the requirements of the Commission’s regulations.11 The application procedures also generally identify information required to be included in applications for registration as a DCO 12, and identify where additional guidance for applicants can be found.13 The rules also provide procedures for the withdrawal of an application for registration 14 and specify the extent of the delegation of authority from the Commission to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, with the concurrence of the General Counsel, with respect to, among other things, the termination of expedited review procedures.15 The Commission is proposing to modify the application procedures in a number of respects. Most of these modifications mirror changes recently made to parts 37 and 38 regarding, among other things, the review and processing of applications for registration of DTEFs and DCMs. With respect to the review period for applications generally, it is proposing to establish, as it recently has under parts 37 and 38, the presumption that all applications are submitted for review under the 180-day timeframe specified in section 6(a) of the Act for DCMs and DTEFs.16 An expedited 90-day review could be requested by the applicant, in which case the Commission would register the applicant as a DCO during or by the end of the 90-day period unless the Commission terminated the expedited review for certain specifically identified reasons. In comparison to the current rules, the Commission is proposing to lengthen the expedited review periods for DCO applications by 30 days. The Commission believes, based upon its experience in processing DCO applications and in light of certain administrative practices that have developed since these rules were first 11 17 CFR 39.3(b). CFR 39.3(a). 13 17 CFR 39.3(d). 14 17 CFR 39.3(c). 15 17 CFR 39.3(e). 16 Under the current rules, DCO applications are routinely reviewed under the fast-track procedures unless the applicant instructs the Commission in writing at the time of the submission of the application or during the review period to review the application pursuant to the time provisions of and procedures under section 6 of the Act. See 17 CFR 39.3(a)(8). 12 17 VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 adopted, that these potentially longer review periods are necessary to ensure a comprehensive review of applications and to meet other public policy objectives. The Commission has reviewed nine DCO applications since passage of the CFMA. The applications themselves are large and contain technical documents describing operations and operational outsourcing agreements. The applications frequently need to be substantially amended or supplemented in various ways and generate a series of questions by Commission staff responsible for reviewing the applications. In addition, a new Commission policy to promote transparency in Commission operations, implemented in August of 2003, provides for the posting of all such applications on the Commission’s Web site for a period of at least 15 days for public review and comment.17 This will lengthen the review process. The proposed 90-day review period should provide the Commission with sufficient time to review these substantial applications and to respond to any public comments. The Commission notes that the proposed 90-day review period, while longer than the current fast-track review periods, would continue to be substantially shorter than the 180-day review period set forth in section 6(a) for DCMs and DTEFs. The Commission also is proposing to modify its internal processing procedures under which an applicant would be registered as a DCO. Under the proposal, an applicant would no longer be deemed to be registered based upon the passage of time (currently 60 days for DCOs). If the applicant requested expedited review, the Commission would take affirmative action to register or designate the applicant as a DCO, subject to conditions if appropriate, not later than 90 days after receipt of the application, unless the Commission terminated the expedited review. Thus, registration as a DCO would involve affirmative action by the Commission, which would normally be in the form of issuance of a Commission order. It should be noted that it would be possible, under the proposed procedures, for applicants who submit applications that are complete and not amended or supplemented during the review period to be designated as a DCO in less than 90 days. With respect to the termination of expedited review, the rules provide that 17 The Commission has recently proposed revisions to Commission Regulation 40.8 to specify which portions of an application for registration as a DTEF or designation as a DCO will be made public. See 69 FR 44981 (July 28, 2004). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 fast-track review may be terminated because the application’s form or substance fails to meet the requirements of part 39 or upon written instruction of the applicant during the review period. Based upon its experience in reviewing applications submitted to date and in light of its new practice of posting all such applications on the Commission’s website for public review and comment, the Commission is proposing to clarify and expand the rationale for terminating expedited review. In addition to the reasons for termination cited above, the Commission is proposing that the expedited review period be terminated if the application is materially incomplete or, as more fully described below, undergoes major amendment or supplementation. The Commission is also proposing to provide for termination of expedited review if an application raises novel or complex issues that require additional time for review. This proposal is responsive to the public interest that the Commission has witnessed to date with respect to DCO applications and is substantially the same as a proposal recently adopted for DCMs and DTEFs. The Commission is further proposing to delete the provision of the rules that would require the Commission, upon terminating fast-track review, to commence a proceeding to deny a DCO application upon the request of the applicant. This procedure has proved to be unnecessary to date, and an analogous procedure is available under the statutory review procedure.18 Finally, the Commission is proposing to amend the expedited review procedures to expressly provide that expedited review would be terminated if an applicant so requests in writing. The Commission stresses that if expedited review were terminated for any of the reasons cited above, the application would continue to be reviewed pursuant to the 180-day procedure. To further enhance the application process, the Commission is proposing to more completely identify the information required to be provided by an applicant under both the 180-day and the expedited 90-day review procedures. The proposal would make it clear that all applicants would be required to submit for review an executed or executable copy of any agreements or contracts entered into or to be entered into by the applicant that enable the applicant to comply with the core principles. Final, signed copies of such documents would be required to be submitted prior to registration. The initial application would be required to 18 7 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM U.S.C. 8(a). 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules include something more than a letter of intent or draft contract or agreement, such as a final contract or agreement signed by at least one of the parties. While the Commission understands that applicants may prefer to defer the finalization of contracts in order to defer associated costs until registration or designation, it must balance that preference against the assurance that a contract or agreement will actually be executed prior to registration. With respect to the additional information that would be required to be submitted as part of the application, the rule requires that applicants demonstrate how they are able to satisfy each of the core principles specified in section 5b of the Act. The proposal would amend the rule to eliminate the proviso, ‘‘to the extent it is not selfevident from the applicant’s rules.’’ Based upon experience in reviewing DCO applications, the Commission recognizes that this additional information is necessary for Commission review of the application when determining whether the applicant satisfies the core principles. The proposal would eliminate the requirement that the applicant support requests for confidential treatment of information included in the application with reasonable justification. The Commission believes that the procedures provided in Commission Regulation 145.9, ‘‘Petition for confidential treatment of information submitted to the Commission,’’ should be followed by all applicants. Under the proposal, the items required to be included in an application to be reviewed under the 180-day review procedures would be identical to those required to be included in an application to be reviewed under the expedited review procedures with the following additional requirements for the expedited review procedure: (1) An applicant must request expedited review; and (2) an application submitted for expedited review must not be amended or supplemented by the applicant, except as requested by the Commission or for correction of typographical errors, renumbering or other nonsubstantive revisions. The proposal provides that amending or supplementing an application in a manner that is inconsistent with the above provision would result in termination of the expedited review. The Commission is also proposing to modify the delegation of authority provisions applicable to applications for registration as a DCO. Currently, the rules provide for the delegation of authority to the Director of the Division VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, with the concurrence of the General Counsel: (1) To terminate the review of both fast-track applications and those reviewed under the 180-day procedure; and (2) to register an applicant as a DCO subject to conditions. The Commission is proposing to modify and standardize the delegation of authority as it applies to DCO applicants. Thus, under the proposal, the Commission would also delegate to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, with the concurrence of the General Counsel, the authority to stay the running of the 180-day review period for applications if they are materially incomplete, as is provided under section 6(a) of the Act. Because one result of the proposed amendments would be that registration as a DCO would involve affirmative action on the part of the Commission, the proposal would rescind the delegation of the authority to designate the applicant as a DCO subject to conditions. The Commission also is adding a provision for vacation of DCO registration. Under this provision, a registered DCO may vacate its registration under section 7 of the Act by filing a request with the Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters. Vacation of registration will not affect any action taken or to be taken by the Commission based upon actions, activities or events occurring during the time that the DCO was registered with the Commission. A similar provision with respect to contract markets is already part of part 38.19 Finally, the Commission is proposing to make minor word changes and deletions in order to clarify requirements and procedures. The Commission continues to encourage applicants to consult with Commission staff prior to formally submitting an application for DCO registration to help ensure that an application, once submitted, will be able to be reviewed in a timely manner. The Commission encourages interested parties, particularly prior applicants, to comment upon these proposals. E. Part 40—Provisions Common to Contract Markets, Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities and Derivatives Clearing Organizations In § 40.1, the definitions therein would be redesignated as numbered subparagraphs, beginning with subparagraph (a). In redesignated subparagraphs 40.1(b)–(e), the definitions of dormant contract/product, dormant contract market, dormant PO 00000 19 17 CFR 38.3(d). Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39677 derivatives clearing organization and dormant derivatives transaction execution facility, respectively, the length of time during which no trading (or clearing) has occurred before dormancy could be declared would be extended from six to twelve calendar months. Also, in § 40.1(b), in the proviso granting a 36-month grace period after initial certification or Commission approval before a contract/ product can be considered dormant, language would be added to make clear that, if the DCM or DTEF itself becomes dormant prior to the running of the 36month period, the contract/product would likewise be considered dormant. Finally, language would be added to § 40.1(b) to allow a board of trade to self-declare a contract/product to be dormant at any time after initial certification or Commission approval. Under new § 40.1(f), a definition of ‘‘dormant rule’’ would be added whereby a new rule or rule amendment that is not made effective and implemented within twelve months of initial certification or Commission approval would be considered dormant and would have to be resubmitted, either by certification or for approval, before it could be implemented. Sections 40.2, 40.3, 40.5 and 40.6 would be revised for internal consistency between sections. In addition, in § 40.2, relating to listing new products for trading by certification, new subparagraph 40.2(b) would make clear that a registered entity shall provide, if requested by Commission staff, additional evidence, information or data relating to whether the contract meets, initially or on a continuing basis, any of the requirements of the Act or Commission regulations or policies thereunder. Such evidence may be beneficial to the Commission in conducting a due diligence assessment of the product and the registered entity’s compliance with these requirements, including the obligation that the registered entity must have reason to believe the certification is proper. This language is consistent with the Commission’s obligation to assure that the Act and Commission regulations and policies thereunder are not being violated. Similar language would be added in § 40.3(a)(9) with respect to voluntary submission of new products for approval, and in §40.6(a)(4) with respect to self-certification of rules by DCMs and DTEFs. DCMs and DTEFs should be aware that, in conducting routine due diligence reviews of selfcertified new product listings and new rules or rule amendments under § 40.2(b) and § 40.6(a)(4), respectively, the staff gives special consideration to E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39678 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules particular requirements. For DTEFs, the key requirements are: § 5a(b)(2) of the Act (requirements for underlying commodities); Core Principle 3 (monitoring trading to assure an orderly market); and Core Principle 4 (disclosure of general information). For DCMs, the key requirements are: Core Principle 3 (listing contracts that are not readily susceptible to manipulation); Core Principle 4 (monitoring trading to prevent manipulation, price distortion or disruptions of the delivery or cashsettlement process); and Core Principle 5 (adopting position limits or position accountability rules to reduce the threat of market manipulation or distortion, especially in the delivery month). To the extent that a DCM or DTEF includes with its initial submission, data, research reports, trade interview reports, exchange or third party analyses, or other background information demonstrating compliance with these requirements, a DTEF or DCM can minimize the prospect of requests for additional information under § 40.2(b) or § 40.6(a)(4), respectively. The proposed revisions to § 40.3 would set forth with greater particularity the information Commission staff needs to make a determination on whether to approve a new product voluntarily submitted for Commission review and approval. Section 5c(c)(2)(B) of the Act and § 40.4 of the regulations require prior Commission approval of DCM rule amendments that, for a delivery month having open interest, would materially change a term or condition of a contract for future delivery of an enumerated agricultural commodity, or an option on such a contract or commodity.20 The proposal would add new subsection 40.4(b)(8) to include fees or fee changes that are $1.00 or more per contract and are established by an independent third party or are unrelated to delivery, trading, clearing or dispute resolution to the types of rule changes for which a materiality determination is not required. The proposal would also make clear that the non-material changes described in § 40.4(b), subparagraphs (1)–(8), would fall within the provisions of revised § 40.6(c) and would be subject to the weekly notification procedures set out therein. Also, in § 40.4(b)(9) under subparagraph (i), the deadline for Commission review of ‘‘non-material agricultural rule changes’’ would be changed from 10 calendar days to 10 business days to provide for a consistent review period for all submissions and to allow for more time for review. Under 20 The ‘‘enumerated commodities’’ are those agricultural commodities listed in § 1a(4) of the Act. VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 subparagraph (ii), the DCM would be required to provide an explanation of why the DCM believes the proposed rule change is non-material. Similarly, in § 40.5(c)(1), the review period for rules that are voluntarily submitted by DCMs or DTEFs for approval would be extended from 30 days to 45 days, to be consistent with § 40.3. Under § 40.6, current § 40.6(a) sets out the conditions under which a DCM or DCO may implement new rules by certifying them to the Commission. Subparagraph 40.6(a)(1) provides that the certification procedure does not apply to rules of a DCM that materially change a term or condition of a futures or option contract on an enumerated agricultural commodity in a delivery month with open interest. Subparagraphs 40.6(a)(2) and (3) set out the filing requirements for rule certifications and the information to be provided in such certifications. Section 40.6(c) establishes an exception to the rule certification requirements of §§ 40.6 (a)(2) and (3) whereby DCMs and DCOs may place certain rules and rule amendments into effect without certification, provided that certain conditions are met. The conditions are that: (1) The DCM or DCO provide to the Commission a weekly summary of rule changes made effective pursuant to this paragraph; and (2) the rule change governs such routine matters as nonmaterial revisions, changes to delivery standards made by third parties that do not affect deliverable supplies or the pricing basis for the product, changes in the composition of an index (other than a stock index) that do not affect the pricing basis of the index, routine changes to option contract terms, and certain fee changes established by independent third parties. The proposed rules would add a reference to § 40.6(a)(1) to the exception established in § 40.6(c). The effect would be to make clear that, while material rule changes involving contract months with open interest in enumerated agricultural commodities may not be certified to the Commission, the type of routine changes described in § 40.6(c)(2), as well as the partially overlapping list of non-material changes in §§ 40.4(b)(1)–(8), would not constitute material changes within the meaning of the Act or Commission regulations. Therefore, DCMs could inform the Commission of such rule changes on a weekly basis under the provisions of § 40.6(c). Also, new § 40.6(c)(2)(vi) would add to the list of items that could be reported weekly under § 40.6(c)(1), changes in survey lists of banks, brokers or dealers that PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 provide market information to an independent third party and that are incorporated by reference as product terms. Finally, new § 40.6(c)(3)(ii)(F) would add de minimis changes to security indexes to the list of information the Commission does not require to be certified or reported weekly by a DCM or DCO. Under § 40.7, Delegations, new § 40.7(a)(3) would delegate to the Division the authority to notify a DCM that a rule change submitted for a materiality determination under § 40.4(b)(9) is material and must be submitted for Commission approval. Finally, new § 40.7(b)(3) would increase the Division’s delegated authority to allow it, with the concurrence of the Office of the General Counsel, to approve rules regarding speculative limits or position accountability. III. Cost-Benefit Analysis Section 15(a) of the Act, as amended by Section 119 of the CFMA, requires the Commission to consider the costs and benefits of its action before issuing a new regulation or order under the Act. By its terms, § 15(a) does not require the Commission to quantify the costs and benefits of its action or to determine whether the benefits of the action outweigh its costs. Rather, § 15(a) simply requires the Commission to ‘‘consider the costs and benefits’’ of the subject rule or order. Section 15(a) further specifies that the costs and benefits of the proposed rule or order shall be evaluated in light of five broad areas of market and public concern: (1) Protection of market participants and the public; (2) efficiency, competitiveness, and financial integrity of futures markets; (3) price discovery; (4) sound risk management practices; and (5) other public interest considerations. The Commission may, in its discretion, give greater weight to any one of the five enumerated areas of concern and may, in its discretion, determine that, notwithstanding its costs, a particular rule or order is necessary or appropriate to protect the public interest or to effectuate any of the provisions or to accomplish any of the purposes of the Act. The amendments proposed herein are intended to clarify and codify acceptable practices under the rules for trading facilities, based on the Commission’s experience over the past four years in applying those rules, including the adoption of several amendments to the original rules over the same period. The proposed amendments also would make various E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules technical corrections and conforming amendments to the rules. In addition, the proposed amendments would revise the application and review process for registration as a DCO by eliminating the presumption of automatic fast-track review of applications and replacing it with the presumption that all applications will be reviewed pursuant to the 180-day timeframe and procedures specified in section 6(a) of the Act. In lieu of the current 60-day automatic fast-track review, the Commission is proposing to permit applicants to request expedited review and to be registered as a DCO not later than 90 days after the Commission receives the application. The Commission has endeavored, in proposing these amendments, to impose the minimum requirements necessary to enable the Commission to perform its oversight functions, to carry out its mandate of assuring the continued existence of competitive and efficient markets and to protect the public interest in markets free of fraud and abuse. After considering these factors, the Commission has determined to propose the rules and rule amendments set forth below. The Commission specifically invites public comment on its application of the criteria contained in the Act for consideration. Commenters are also invited to submit any quantifiable data that they may have concerning the costs and benefits of the proposed rules with their comment letter. IV. Related Matters A. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires federal agencies, in promulgating rules, to consider the impact of those rules on small entities. The rules proposed herein would affect exempt commercial markets, exempt boards of trade, derivatives transaction execution facilities, designated contract markets and designated clearing organizations. The Commission has previously determined that the foregoing entities are not small entities for purposes of the RFA.21 Accordingly, the Chairman, on behalf of the Commission, hereby certifies pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that the proposed rules will not have a 21 47 FR 18618, 18619 (April 30, 1982) discussing contract markets; 66 FR 42256, 42268 (August 10, 2001) discussing exempt boards of trade, exempt commercial markets and derivatives transaction execution facilities; 66 FR 45605, 45609 (August 29, 2001) discussing designated clearing organizations. VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This proposed rulemaking contains information collection requirements. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3504(h)), the Commission has submitted a copy of this section to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its review. Collection of Information: Rules Relating to Part 36, Establishing Procedures for Exempt Markets, OMB Control Number 3038–0054. The estimated burden was calculated as follows: Estimated number of respondents: 10. Annual responses by each respondent: 1. Total annual responses: 10. Estimated average hours per response: 1. Annual reporting burden: 10. Collection of Information: Rules Relating to Part 38, Establishing Procedures for Entities to become Designated as Contract Markets, OMB Control Number 3038–0052. The proposed rules will not change the burden previously approved by OMB. The estimated burden was calculated as follows: Estimated number of respondents: 13. Annual responses by each respondent: 1. Total annual responses: 13. Estimated average hours per response: 300. Annual reporting burden: 3,900. Collection of Information: Rules Relating to Part 39, Establishing Procedures for Entities to Become Registered as Derivatives Clearing Organizations, OMB Control Number 3038–0051. The proposed rules will not change the burden previously approved by OMB. The estimated burden was calculated as follows: Estimated number of respondents: 10. Reports annually by each respondent: 1. Total annual responses: 10. Estimated average hours per response: 200. Annual burden in fiscal year: 2,000. Organizations and individuals desiring to submit comments on the information collection requirements should direct them to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503; Attention: Desk Officer for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39679 The Commission considers comments by the public on this proposed collection of information in: Evaluating whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information will have a practical use; Evaluating the accuracy of the Commission’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and Minimizing the burden of collecting information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information contained in these proposed regulations between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the deadline for the public to comment to the Commission on the proposed regulations. Copies of the information collection submission to OMB are available from the CFTC Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418–5160. List of Subjects 17 CFR Part 36 Commodity futures, Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 17 CFR Part 37 Commodity futures, Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 17 CFR Part 38 Commodity futures, Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 17 CFR Part 39 Commodity futures, Consumer Protection. 17 CFR Part 40 Commodity futures, Contract markets, Designation application, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority in the Commodity Exchange Act and, in particular, sections 1a, 2, 3, 4, 4c, 4i, 5, E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39680 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 6 and 8a of the Act, the Commission hereby proposes to amend Chapter I of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 36—EXEMPT MARKETS 1. The authority citation for part 36 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2, 5, 6, 6c, and 12a, as amended by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, Appendix E of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763 (2000). 1a. Section 36.2 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: § 36.2 Exempt boards of trade. * * * * * (b) Notification. Boards of trade operating under Section 5d of the Act as exempt boards of trade shall so notify the Commission. This notification shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters, in electronic form, shall be labeled as ‘‘Notification of Operation as an Exempt Board of Trade,’’ and shall include: (1) The name and address of the exempt board of trade; and (2) The name and telephone number of a contact person. (c) Additional requirements. (1) Prohibited representation. A board of trade notifying the Commission that it meets the criteria of Section 5d of the Act and elects to operate as an exempt board of trade shall not represent to any person that it is registered with, designated, recognized, licensed or approved by the Commission. (2) Market data dissemination. (i) Criteria for price discovery determination. An exempt board of trade operating a market in reliance on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act performs a significant price discovery function for transactions in the cash market for a commodity underlying any agreement, contract, or transaction executed or traded on the facility when: (A) Cash market bids, offers or transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis; or (B) The market’s prices are routinely disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market transactions. (ii) Notification. An exempt board of trade operating a market in reliance on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act shall notify the Commission when: (A) It has reason to believe that cash market bids, offers or transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 differential to, the prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis; (B) It has reason to believe that the market’s prices are routinely disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market transactions; or (C) The exempt board of trade holds out the market to the public as performing a price discovery function for the cash market for the commodity. (iii) Price discovery determination. Following receipt of a notice under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, or on its own initiative, the Commission may notify an exempt board of trade operating a market in reliance on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act that the facility appears to meet the criteria for performing a significant price discovery function under paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) or (B) of this section. Before making a final price discovery determination under this paragraph, the Commission shall provide the exempt board of trade with an opportunity for a hearing through the submission of written data, views and arguments. Any such written data, views and arguments shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission in the form and manner and within the time specified by the Commission. After consideration of all relevant matters, the Commission shall issue an order containing its determination whether the facility performs a significant price discovery function under the criteria of paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) or (B) of this section. (iv) Price dissemination. (A) An exempt board of trade that the Commission has determined performs a significant price discovery function under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section shall disseminate publicly, and on a daily basis, all of the following information with respect to transactions executed in reliance on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act: (1) Contract terms and conditions, or a product description, and trading conventions, mechanisms and practices; (2) Trading volume by commodity and, if available, open interest; and (3) The opening and closing prices or price ranges, the daily high and low prices, a volume-weighted average price that is representative of trading on the board of trade, or such other daily price information as proposed by the board of trade and approved by the Commission. (B) The exempt board of trade shall make such information readily available to the news media and the general public without charge no later than the business day following the day to which the information pertains. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (v) Modification of price discovery determination. An exempt board of trade that the Commission has determined performs a significant price discovery function under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section may petition the Commission at any time to modify or vacate that determination. The petition shall contain an appropriate justification for the request. The Commission, after notice and opportunity for a hearing through the submission of written data, views and arguments, shall by order grant, grant subject to conditions, or deny such request. (3) Annual Certification. A board of trade operating under Section 5d of the Act as an exempt board of trade shall file with the Commission annually, no later than the end of each calendar year, a notice that includes: (i) A statement that it continues to operate under the exemption; and (ii) A certification that the information contained in the previous Notification of Operation as an Exempt Board of Trade is still correct. 2. Section 36.3 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (a) introductory text, revising paragraph (c)(2)(ii), and adding a new paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows: § 36.3 Exempt commercial markets. (a) Notification. An electronic trading facility relying upon the exemption in Section 2(h)(3) of the Act shall notify the Commission of its intention to do so. This notification, and subsequent notification of any material changes in the information initially provided, shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters, in electronic form, shall be labeled as ‘‘Notification of Operation as an Exempt Commercial Market,’’ and shall include the information and certifications specified in Section 2(h)(5)(A) of the Act. * * * * * (c) * * * (2) * * * (ii) Notification. An electronic trading facility operating in reliance on Section 2(h)(3) of the Act shall notify the Commission when: (A) It has reason to believe that cash market bids, offers or transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis; (B) It has reason to believe that the market’s prices are routinely disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market transactions; or E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules (C) The market holds itself out to the public as performing a price discovery function for the cash market for the commodity. * * * * * (4) Annual Certification. An electronic trading facility operating in reliance upon the exemption in Section 2(h)(3) of the Act shall file with the Commission annually, no later than the end of each calendar year, a notice that includes: (i) A statement that it continues to operate under the exemption; and (ii) A certification that the information contained in the previous Notification of Operation as an Exempt Commercial Market is still correct. PART 37—DERIVATIVES TRANSACTION EXECUTION FACILITIES 3. The authority citation for part 37 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2, 5, 6, 6c, 6(c), 7a and 12a, as amended by Appendix E of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763A–365. 3a. Section 37.1 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 37.1 Scope and definition. (a) Scope. The provisions of this part apply to any board of trade operating as or applying to become registered as a derivatives transaction execution facility under Sections 5a and 6 of the Act. * * * * * 4. Section 37.2 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: § 37.2 Exemption. Contracts, agreements or transactions traded on a derivatives transaction execution facility registered as such with the Commission under Section 5a of the Act, the facility and the facility’s operator are exempt from all Commission regulations for such activity, except for the requirements of this Part 37 and: (a) Section 15.05, part 40 and part 41 of this chapter, including any related definitions and cross-referenced sections; and (b) Sections 1.3, 1.31, 1.59(d), 1.60, 1.63(c), 33.10, and part 190 of this chapter and, as applicable to the market, §§ 15.00 to 15.04 and parts 16 through 21 of this chapter, including any related definitions and cross-referenced sections, which are applicable as though they were set forth in this part 37 and included specific reference to derivatives transaction execution facilities. 5. Section 37.3 is proposed to be amended as follows: VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 a. By redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraphs (d) and (e); b. By redesignating paragraph (a)(5) as paragraph (b); c. By redesignating paragraph (a)(6) introductory text as paragraph (c); d. By redesignating paragraph (a)(6)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs (c)(1) and (2); and e. By redesignating paragraphs (a)(6)(ii)(A) through (H) as paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (viii). 6. Section 37.6 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: § 37.6 Compliance with core principles. (a) In general. To maintain registration as a derivatives transaction execution facility upon commencing operations by listing products for trading or otherwise, or for a dormant derivatives transaction execution facility as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter that has been reinstated under § 37.5(d) upon recommencing operations by relisting products for trading or otherwise, and on a continuing basis thereafter, the derivatives transaction execution facility must have the capacity to be, and be, in compliance with the core principles of Section 5a(d) of the Act. (b) New and reinstated derivatives transaction execution facilities—(1) Certification of compliance. Unless an applicant for registration or for reinstatement of registration has chosen to make a voluntary demonstration under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a newly registered derivatives transaction execution facility at the time it commences operations, or a dormant derivatives transaction execution facility as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter at the time that it recommences operations, must certify to the Commission that it has the capacity to, and will, operate in compliance with the core principles under Section 5a(d) of the Act. (2) Voluntary demonstration of compliance. An applicant for registration or for reinstatement of registration may choose to make a voluntary demonstration of its capacity to operate in compliance with the core principles. Such demonstration may be included in an application submitted pursuant to § 37.5 of this part. (i) The demonstration would include the following: (A) The label, ‘‘Demonstration of Compliance with Core Principles for Operation’’; (B) A document that describes the manner in which the applicant will comply with each core principle (such as a regulatory chart), which could cite to documents previously submitted PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39681 including documents submitted pursuant to § 37.5(b)(1)(ii)(A)–(E); and (C) To the extent that any of the items in § 37.5(b)(1)(ii)(A)–(E) raise issues that are novel, or for which compliance with a core principle is not self-evident, an explanation as to how that item and the application satisfy the core principle. (ii) If it appears that the applicant has failed to make the requisite showing, the Commission will so notify the applicant at the end of that period. Upon commencement or recommencement of operations by the derivatives transaction execution facility, such a notice may be considered by the Commission in a determination to issue a notice of violation of core principles under Section 5c(d) of the Act. (c) Existing derivatives transaction execution facilities—(1) In general. Upon request by the Commission, a registered derivatives transaction execution facility shall file with the Commission such data, documents and other information as the Commission may specify in its request that demonstrates that the registered derivatives transaction execution facility is in compliance with one or more core principles as specified in the request or that is requested by the Commission to enable the Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act. (2) Delegation of authority. The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, the authority set forth in paragraph (c)(1) to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate from time to time. The Director may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter that has been delegated in this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this paragraph. (3) Change of owners. Upon a change of ownership of an existing registered derivatives transaction execution facility, the new owner shall file electronically with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC, headquarters, a certification that the derivatives transaction execution facility meets the requirements for trading and the criteria for registration of Sections 5a(b) and 5a(c) of the Act, respectively. (d) Guidance regarding compliance with core principles. Appendix B to this part provides guidance to registered derivatives transaction execution facilities on compliance with the core principles under Section 5a(d) of the Act. E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39682 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules 7. Section 37.7 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: amended by revising the heading of the appendix and the first paragraph of the appendix to read as follows: § 37.7 Appendix A to Part 37—Guidance on Compliance With Registration Criteria Additional requirements. * * * * * (b) Material modifications. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5c(c) of the Act, registered derivatives transaction execution facilities need not certify rules or rule amendments under § 40.6 of this chapter, and must only notify the Commission prior to placing into effect or amending such a rule, (as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter): (1) By electronic notification to the Commission of the rule to be placed into effect or to be changed, in a format approved by the Secretary of the Commission, at the time traders or participants in the market are notified, but (unless taken as an emergency action) in no event later than the close of business on the business day preceding implementation. The submission notification shall be labeled ‘‘DTEF Rule Notices’’ and shall include the text of the rule or rule amendment (with deletions and additions indicated). Provided, however, the derivatives transaction execution facility need not notify the Commission of rules or rule amendments for which no certification is required under § 40.6(c) of this chapter. (2) The derivatives transaction execution facility must maintain documentation regarding all changes to rules, terms and conditions or trading protocols. * * * * * 8. Section 37.8 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 37.8 Information relating to transactions on derivatives transaction execution facilities. * * * * * (b) Special calls for information from futures commission merchants or foreign brokers. Upon special call by the Commission, each person registered as a futures commission merchant or a foreign broker (as defined in § 15.00 of this chapter) that carries or has carried an account for a customer on a derivatives transaction execution facility shall provide information to the Commission concerning such accounts or related positions carried for the customer on that or other facilities or markets, in the form and manner and within the time specified by the Commission in the special call. * * * * * 9. Appendix A to Part 37— Application Guidance is proposed to be VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 This appendix provides guidance on meeting the criteria for registration under Sections 5a(c) and 6 of the Act and this Part, both initially and on an ongoing basis. The guidance following each registration criterion is illustrative only of the types of matters an applicant may address, as applicable, and is not intended to be used as a mandatory checklist. Addressing the issues and questions set forth in this appendix would help the Commission in its consideration of whether the application has met the criteria for registration. To the extent that compliance with, or satisfaction of, a criterion for registration is not selfexplanatory from the face of the derivatives transaction execution facility’s rules, (as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter), the application should include an explanation or other form of documentation demonstrating that the applicant meets the registration criteria of Section 5a(c) of the Act and § 37.5. * * * * * 10. Appendix B to Part 37—Guidance on Compliance With Core Principles is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs 1. and 3. of the appendix to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 37—Guidance on Compliance With Core Principles 1. This appendix provides guidance on complying with the core principles in order to maintain registration under Section 5a(d) of the Act and this Part. This guidance is illustrative only and is not intended to be used as a mandatory checklist. * * * * * 3. Alternatively, if an applicant for registration or for reinstatement of registration under § 37.6(b)(2) chooses to provide the Commission with a demonstration of its compliance with core principles, addressing the issues set forth in this appendix would help the Commission in its consideration of such compliance. To the extent that compliance with, or satisfaction of, the core principles is not self-explanatory from the face of the derivatives transaction execution facility’s rules, (as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter) a submission under § 37.6(b)(2) should include an explanation or other form of documentation demonstrating that the derivatives transaction execution facility complies with the core principles. * * * * * 11. Appendix B to part 37 is proposed to be further amended by revising the second paragraph of Core Principle 5 to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 37—Guidance on Compliance With Core Principles * PO 00000 * Frm 00016 * * Fmt 4702 * Sfmt 4702 Core Principle 5 of Section 5a(d)(5) of the Act: DAILY PUBLICATION OF TRADING INFORMATION * * * A board of trade operating as a registered derivatives transaction execution facility should provide to the public information regarding settlement prices, price range, trading volume, open interest and other related market information for all applicable contracts, as determined by the Commission. In making such determination, the Commission will consider whether a contract performs a significant price discovery function for transactions in the cash market for the commodity underlying the contract. The Commission will apply the same standards applicable to exempt boards of trade and exempt commercial markets (see §§ 36.2(b)(2) and 36.3(c)(2), respectively) whereby a market performs a significant price discovery function for transactions in the cash market for an underlying commodity if: Cash market bids, offers or transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis; or the market’s prices are routinely disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market transactions. In the event the Commission has reason to believe that a derivatives transaction execution facility may meet either of the foregoing standards, or if the facility holds itself out to the public as performing a price discovery function for the cash market for the underlying commodity, the Commission shall notify the facility that it appears to meet the criteria for performing a significant price discovery function under Core Principle 5. Before making a final price discovery determination under this core principle, the Commission shall provide the facility with an opportunity for a hearing through the submission of written data, views and arguments. After consideration of all relevant matters, the Commission shall issue an order containing its determination whether the requirement of the core principle on publication of trading information under Section 5a(d)(5) of the Act applies to a particular contract traded on a facility. Provision of information for any applicable contract could be through such means as providing the information to a financial information service or by placing the information on a facility’s website. Such information shall be made available to the public without charge no later than the business day following the day to which the information pertains. * * * * * PART 38—DESIGNATED CONTRACT MARKETS 12. The authority citation for part 38 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2, 5, 6, 6c, 7 and 12a, as amended by Appendix E of Pub. L. 106– 554, 114 Stat. 2763A–365. 12a. Section 38.1 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39683 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules § 38.1 Scope. The provisions of this part 38 shall apply to every board of trade that has been designated or is applying to become designated as a contract market under Sections 5 and 6 of the Act. Provided, however, nothing in this provision affects the eligibility of designated contract markets to operate under the provisions of parts 36 or 37 of this chapter. 13. Section 38.2 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: new owner shall file electronically with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC, headquarters, a certification that the designated contract market meets all of the requirements of Sections 5(b) and 5(d) of the Act and the provisions of this Part 38. * * * * * 15. Appendix A to Part 38— Application Guidance is proposed to be amended by revising the title of the appendix and the first paragraph of the appendix to read as follows: § 38.2 Appendix A to Part 38—Guidance on Compliance With Designation Criteria Exemption. Agreements, contracts, or transactions traded on a designated contract market under Section 5 of the Act, the contract market and the contract market’s operator are exempt from all Commission regulations for such activity, except for the requirements of this Part 38 and §§ 1.3, 1.12(e), 1.31, 1.37(c)–(d), 1.38, 1.52, 1.59(d), 1.60, 1.63(c), 1.67, 33.10, Part 9, Parts 15 through 21, Part 40, Part 41 and Part 190 of this chapter, including any related definitions and cross-referenced sections. 14. Section 38.5 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (b), redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (d), and adding new paragraph (c) as follows: § 38.5 Information relating to contract market compliance. * * * * * * (b) Upon request by the Commission, a designated contract market shall file with the Commission a written demonstration, containing such supporting data, information and documents, in the form and manner and within such time as the Commission may specify, that the designated contract market is in compliance with one or more designation criteria or core principles as specified in the request, or that is requested by the Commission to enable the Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act. (c) Delegation of authority. The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, the authority set forth in paragraph (b) of this section to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate from time to time. The Director may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter that has been delegated in this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this paragraph. (d) Upon a change of ownership of an existing designated contract market, the VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 This appendix provides guidance on meeting the criteria for designation under Sections 5(b) and 6 of the Act and this Part, both initially and on an ongoing basis. The guidance following each designation criterion is illustrative only of the types of matters an applicant may address, as applicable, and is not intended to be used as a mandatory checklist. Addressing the issues and questions set forth in this appendix would help the Commission in its consideration of whether the application has met the criteria for designation. To the extent that compliance with, or satisfaction of, a criterion for designation is not selfexplanatory from the face of the contract market’s rules (as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter), the application should include an explanation or other form of documentation demonstrating that the applicant meets the designation criteria of Section 5(b) of the Act. * * * * 16. Appendix A to Part 38 is proposed to be further amended by revising the second paragraph of Designation Criterion 7 to read as follows: Appendix A to Part 38—Guidance on Compliance With Designation Criteria * * * * * Designation Criterion 7 of Section 5(b) of the Act: PUBLIC ACCESS * * * A designated contract market should provide information to the public by placing the information on its website. * * * * * 17. Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles 1. This appendix provides guidance on complying with the core principles, both initially and on an ongoing basis, to maintain designation under Section 5(d) of the Act and this Part. The guidance is provided in paragraph (a) following each core principle and it can be used to demonstrate to the Commission core principle compliance, under §§ 38.3(a) and 38.5. The guidance for each core principle is illustrative only of the PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 types of matters a board of trade may address, as applicable, and is not intended to be used as a mandatory checklist. Addressing the issues and questions set forth in this appendix would help the Commission in its consideration of whether the board of trade is in compliance with the core principles. To the extent that compliance with, or satisfaction of, a core principle is not selfexplanatory from the face of the board of trade’s rules (as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter), an application pursuant to § 38.3, or a submission pursuant to § 38.5 should include an explanation or other form of documentation demonstrating that the board of trade complies with the core principles. 2. Acceptable practices meeting selected requirements of the core principles are set forth in paragraph (b) following each core principle. Boards of trade that follow the specific practices outlined under paragraph (b) for any core principle in this appendix will meet the selected requirements of the applicable core principle. Paragraph (b) is for illustrative purposes only, and does not state the exclusive means for satisfying a core principle. * * * * * 18. Appendix B to Part 38 is proposed to be further amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) of Core Principle 2 to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles * * * * * Core Principle 2 of Section 5(d) of the Act: COMPLIANCE WITH RULES * * * (a) Application guidance. (1) A designated contract market should have arrangements and resources for effective trade practice surveillance programs, with the authority to collect information and documents on both a routine and non-routine basis, including the examination of books and records kept by the contract market’s members and by nonintermediated market participants. The arrangements and resources should facilitate the direct supervision of the market and the analysis of data collected. Trade practice surveillance programs may be carried out by the contract market itself or through delegation or contracting-out to a third party. If the contract market delegates or contractsout the trade practice surveillance responsibility to a third party, such third party should have the capacity and authority to carry out such program, and the contract market should retain appropriate supervisory authority over the third party. * * * * * 19. Appendix B to Part 38 is proposed to be further amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) of Core Principle 6 to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles * E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM * 11JYP1 * * * 39684 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules Core Principle 6 of Section 5(d) of the Act: EMERGENCY AUTHORITY * * * (a) Application guidance. A designated contract market should have clear procedures and guidelines for contract market decisionmaking regarding emergency intervention in the market, including procedures and guidelines to avoid conflicts of interest while carrying out such decision-making. A contract market should also have the authority to intervene as necessary to maintain markets with fair and orderly trading as well as procedures for carrying out the intervention. Procedures and guidelines should include notifying the Commission of the exercise of a contract market’s regulatory emergency authority, explaining how conflicts of interest are minimized, and documenting the contract market’s decisionmaking process and the reasons for using its emergency action authority. Information on steps taken under such procedures should be included in a submission of a certified rule and any related submissions for rule approval pursuant to Part 40, when carried out pursuant to a contract market’s emergency authority. To address perceived market threats, the contract market, among other things, should be able to impose position limits in the delivery month, impose or modify price limits, modify circuit breakers, call for additional margin either from customers or clearing members, order the liquidation or transfer of open positions, order the fixing of a settlement price, order a reduction in positions, extend or shorten the expiration date or the trading hours, suspend or curtail trading on the market, order the transfer of customer contracts and the margin for such contracts from one member including non-intermediated market participants of the contract market to another, or alter the delivery terms or conditions, or, if applicable, should provide for such actions through its agreements with its third-party provider of clearing services. (b) Acceptable practices. [Reserved] * * * * * 20. Appendix B to Part 38 is proposed to be further amended by adding paragraph (b) to Core Principle 7 to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles * * * * * ensure that the rulebook posted on its website is available to the public (i.e., can be accessed by visitors to the website without the need to register, log in, provide a user name or obtain a password) and is current to within one day of implementation of a new or amended rule. * * * * * 20. Appendix B to Part 38 is proposed to be further amended by adding paragraph (b) of Core Principle 8 to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles * * * * * Core Principle 8 of Section 5(d) of the Act: DAILY PUBLICATION OF TRADING INFORMATION * * * * * * * * (b) Acceptable Practices. The mandatory compliance with Section 16.01, ‘‘Trading volume, open contracts, prices and critical dates,’’ required under the regulations, would constitute an acceptable practice under Core Principle 8. * * * * * 21. Appendix B to Part 38 is proposed to be further amended by revising paragraph (a) of Core Principle 16 to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles * * * * * Core Principle 16 of Section 5(d) of the Act: COMPOSITION OF BOARDS OF MUTUALLY OWNED CONTRACT MARKETS * * * (a) Application guidance. The composition of a mutually-owned contract market’s governing board should fairly represent the diversity of interests of the contract market’s market participants. * * * * * PART 39—DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS 22. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Core Principle 7 of Section 5(d) of the Act: AVAILABILITY OF GENERAL INFORMATION * * * Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7b as amended by Appendix E of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763A–365. * 22a. Section 39.3 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: * * * * (b) Acceptable practices. In making information available to market participants and the public, on its website, a designated contract market should place information on the website no later than the day a new product is listed, the day a new or amended rule is implemented or the day previously disclosed information is changed. For example, the timely provision of this information on a contract market’s website could be done through press releases, newsletters or notices to members. Additionally, a contract market should VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 § 39.3 Procedures for registration. (a) Application Procedures. (1) 180day review procedures. An organization desiring to be registered as a derivatives clearing organization shall file electronically an application for registration with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC, headquarters. Except as provided under the 90-day review procedures described PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Commission will review the application for registration as a derivatives clearing organization pursuant to the 180-day timeframe and procedures specified in Section 6(a) of the Act. The Commission may approve or deny the application or, if deemed appropriate, register the applicant as a derivatives clearing organization subject to conditions. (2) The following must be included: (i) The application is labeled as being submitted pursuant to this Part 39; (ii) The applicant represents that it will operate in accordance with the definition of derivatives clearing organization contained in Section 1a(9) of the Act; (iii) The application includes a copy of the applicant’s rules; (iv) The application demonstrates how the applicant is able to satisfy each of the core principles specified in Section 5b(c)(2) of the Act; (v) The applicant submits agreements entered into or to be entered into between or among the applicant, its operator or its participants, and descriptions of system test procedures, tests conducted or test results, that will enable the applicant to comply, or demonstrate the applicant’s ability to comply, with the core principles specified in Section 5b(c)(2) of the Act; and (vi) The applicant identifies with particularity information in the application that will be subject to a request for confidential treatment and supports that request for confidential treatment. (3) Ninety-day review procedures. An organization desiring to be registered as a derivatives clearing organization may request that its application be reviewed on a 90-day basis and that the applicant be registered as a derivatives clearing organization 90 days after the date of receipt of the application for registration by the Secretary of the Commission. The 90-day period shall begin on the first business day (during the business hours defined in § 40.1 of this chapter) that the Commission is in receipt of the application. Unless the Commission notifies the applicant during the 90-day period that the expedited review has been terminated pursuant to § 39.3(b), the Commission will register the applicant as a derivatives clearing organization during the 90-day period. If deemed appropriate by the Commission, the registration may be subject to such conditions as the Commission may stipulate. (i) The application must include the items described in §§ 39.3(a)(2)(i)–(vi); and E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules (ii) The applicant must not amend or supplement the application except as requested by the Commission or for correction of typographical errors, renumbering or other nonsubstantive revisions, during that period. (b) Termination of 90-day review. (1) During the 90-day period for review pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Commission shall notify the applicant seeking registration that the Commission is terminating review under this section and will review the proposal under the 180-day time period and procedures of Section 6(a) of the Act, if it appears to the Commission that the application: (i) Is materially incomplete; (ii) Fails in form or substance to meet the requirements of this part; (iii) Raises novel or complex issues that require additional time for review; or (iv) Is amended or supplemented in a manner that is inconsistent with § 39.3(a)(3)(ii). (2) This termination notification shall identify the deficiencies in the application that render it incomplete, the manner in which the application fails to meet the requirements of this part, or the novel or complex issues that require additional time for review. The Commission shall also terminate review under this section if requested in writing to do so by the applicant. (c) Withdrawal of application for registration. An applicant for registration may withdraw its application submitted pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1)–(2) or (a)(3) of this section by filing with the Commission such a request. Withdrawal of an application for registration shall not affect any action taken or to be taken by the Commission based upon actions, activities, or events occurring during the time that the application for registration was pending with the Commission. (d) Guidance for applicants and registrants. Appendix A to this part provides guidance to applicants and registrants on how the core principles specified in Section 5b(c)(2) of the Act may be satisfied. (e) Reinstatement of dormant registration. Before listing or relisting contracts for clearing, a dormant registered derivatives clearing organization as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter must reinstate its registration under the procedures of paragraph (a)(1)–(2) or (a)(3) of this section; provided, however, that an application for reinstatement may rely upon previously submitted materials that still pertain to, and accurately describe, current conditions. VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 (f) Request for vacation of registration. A registered derivatives clearing organization may vacate its registration under Section 7 of the Act by filing electronically such a request with the Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters. Vacation of registration shall not affect any action taken or to be taken by the Commission based upon actions, activities or events occurring during the time that the facility was designated by the Commission. (g) Delegation of authority. (1) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight or the Director’s delegates, with the concurrence of the General Counsel or the General Counsel’s delegates, the authority to notify an applicant seeking designation under Section 6(a) of the Act that the application is materially incomplete and the running of the 180-day period is stayed or that the 90-day review under paragraph (a)(3) of this section is terminated. (2) The Director of the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter which has been delegated in this paragraph. (3) Nothing in this paragraph prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in paragraph (g)(1) of this section. PART 40—PROVISIONS COMMON TO CONTRACT MARKETS, DERIVATIVES TRANSACTION EXECUTION FACILITIES AND DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS 23. The authority citation for part 40 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 5, 6, 6c, 7, 7a, 8 and 12a, as amended by appendix E of Pub. L. 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763A–365. 23a. Section 40.1 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: § 40.1 Definitions. As used in this part: (a) Business hours means the hours between 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 p.m., eastern standard time or eastern daylight savings time, whichever is currently in effect in Washington, DC, all days except Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays. (b) Dormant contract or dormant product means any commodity futures or option contract or other agreement, contract, transaction or instrument in which no trading has occurred in any future or option expiration for a period of twelve complete calendar months and in which there is no open interest; PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39685 provided, however, no contract or instrument shall be considered to be dormant until the end of 36 complete calendar months following initial exchange certification or Commission approval, or until the designated contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility on which it is traded becomes dormant. Notwithstanding the above, a board of trade may, by certifying to the Commission, self-declare a contract to be dormant at any time following initial exchange certification or Commission approval. (c) Dormant contract market means any designated contract market on which no trading has occurred for a period of twelve complete calendar months; provided, however, no contract market shall be considered to be dormant until the end of 36 complete calendar months following the day that the initial order of designation was issued. (d) Dormant derivatives clearing organization means any derivatives clearing organization that has not accepted for clearing any agreement, contract or transaction that is required or permitted to be cleared by a derivatives clearing organization under Sections 5b(a) and 5b(b) of the Act, respectively, for a period of twelve complete calendar months; provided, however, no derivatives clearing organization shall be considered to be dormant until the end of 36 complete calendar months following the day that the initial order of registration was issued. (e) Dormant derivatives transaction execution facility means any derivatives transaction execution facility on which no trading has occurred for a period of twelve complete calendar months; provided, however, no derivatives transaction execution facility shall be considered to be dormant until the end of 36 complete calendar months following the day that the initial order of registration was issued. (f) Dormant rule means any new rule or rule amendment which the designated contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility or derivatives clearing organization has not made effective and implemented; provided, however, no new rule or rule amendment shall be considered to be dormant until the end of twelve complete calendar months following initial certification or Commission approval. Prior to implementing a dormant rule, it should be resubmitted to the Commission, either by certification or for approval. (g) Emergency means any occurrence or circumstance which, in the opinion E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39686 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules of the governing board of the contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility or derivatives clearing organization, requires immediate action and threatens or may threaten such things as the fair and orderly trading in, or the liquidation of or delivery pursuant to, any agreements, contracts or transactions on such a trading facility, including: Any manipulative or attempted manipulative activity; any actual, attempted, or threatened corner, squeeze, congestion, or undue concentration of positions; any circumstances which may materially affect the performance of agreements, contracts or transactions traded on the trading facility, including failure of the payment system or the bankruptcy or insolvency of any participant; any action taken by any governmental body, or any other board of trade, market or facility which may have a direct impact on trading on the trading facility; and any other circumstance which may have a severe, adverse effect upon the functioning of a designated contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility. (h) Rule means any constitutional provision, article of incorporation, bylaw, rule, regulation, resolution, interpretation, stated policy, term and condition, trading protocol, agreement or instrument corresponding thereto, in whatever form adopted, and any amendment or addition thereto or repeal thereof, made or issued by a contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility or derivatives clearing organization or by the governing board thereof or any committee thereof, except those provisions relating to the setting of levels of margin for commodities other than those subject to the provisions of Section 2(a)(1)(C)(v) of the Act and security futures as defined in Section 1a(31) of the Act. (i) Terms and conditions mean any definition of the trading unit or the specific commodity underlying a contract for the future delivery of a commodity or commodity option contract, specification of cash settlement or delivery standards and procedures, and establishment of buyers’ and sellers’ rights and obligations under the contract. Terms and conditions include provisions relating to the following: (1) Quality and other standards that define the commodity or instrument underlying the contract; (2) Quantity standards or other provisions related to contract size; (3) Any applicable premiums or discounts for delivery of nonpar products; VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 (4) Trading hours, trading months and the listing of contracts; (5) The pricing basis and minimum price fluctuations; (6) Any price limits, trading halts, or circuit breaker provisions, and procedures for the establishment of daily settlement prices; (7) Position limits, position accountability standards, and position reporting requirements; (8) Delivery points and locational price differentials; (9) Delivery standards and procedures, including fees related to delivery or the delivery process, alternatives to delivery and applicable penalties or sanctions for failure to perform; (10) If cash settled; all provisions related to the definition, composition, calculation and revision of the cash settlement price or index; and (11) Payment or collection of commodity option premiums or margins. 24. Section 40.2 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: § 40.2 Listing products for trading by certification. (a) A registered entity may list a new product for trading, list a product for trading that has become dormant, or accept for clearing a product that is not traded on a designated contract market or a registered derivatives transaction execution facility, if the following conditions have been met: (1) The registered entity has filed its submission electronically with the Secretary of the Commission and at the regional office having local jurisdiction over the registered entity, in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission; (2) The Commission has received the submission at its headquarters by close of business on the business day preceding the product’s listing or acceptance for clearing, and: (3) The submission includes: (i) A copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in Appendix D to this part; (ii) A copy of the product’s rules, including all rules related to its terms and conditions, or the rules establishing the terms and conditions of the listed product that make it acceptable for clearing; (iii) The intended listing date; and (iv) A certification by the registered entity that the product to be listed complies with the Act and regulations thereunder. (b) A registered entity shall provide, if requested by Commission staff, additional evidence, information or data PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 relating to whether the contract meets, initially or on a continuing basis, any of the requirements of the Act or Commission regulations or policies thereunder which may be beneficial to the Commission in conducting a due diligence assessment of the product and the entity’s compliance with these requirements. (c) Stay. The Commission may stay the listing of a contract pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section during the pendency of Commission proceedings for filing a false certification or to alter or amend the contract terms and conditions pursuant to Section 8a(7) of the Act. The decision to stay the listing of a contract in such circumstances shall not be delegable to any employee of the Commission. 25. Section 40.3 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs (a), (c), and (e)(2) to read as follows: § 40.3 Voluntary submission of new products for Commission review and approval. (a) Request for approval. A designated contract market or registered derivatives transaction execution facility may request under Section 5c(c)(2) of the Act that the Commission approve new products. A submission requesting approval shall: (1) Be filed electronically with the Secretary of the Commission and at the regional office of the Commission having local jurisdiction over the submitting registered entity in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission; (2) Include a copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in Appendix D to this part; (3) Include a copy of the rules that set forth the contract’s terms and conditions; (4) Comply with the requirements of Appendix A to this Part—Guideline No. 1. To demonstrate compliance, the submission shall include: (i) An explanation, if not self-evident from the rules, as to how the specific terms and conditions satisfy the acceptable practices set forth in Guideline No. 1, Appendix A to Part 40. This information may be provided in narrative form or by completion of the applicable chart. (ii) For physical delivery contracts, an explanation as to how the terms and conditions as a whole will result in a deliverable supply such that the contract will not be conducive to price manipulation or distortion and that the deliverable supply reasonably can be expected to be available to short traders and salable by long traders at its market E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules value in normal cash marketing channels. (iii) For cash settled contracts, an explanation as to how the cash settlement of the contract is at a price reflecting the underlying cash market, will not be subject to manipulation or distortion, and is based on a cash price series that is reliable, acceptable, publicly available and timely. (iv)(A) A brief description of the cash market for the commodity, instrument, index or interest that underlies the contract. The description may include materials prepared by the designated contract market or registered derivatives transaction execution facility, existing studies by industry trade groups, academics, governmental bodies or other entities, reports of consultants, or other materials, which provide a description of the underlying cash market. (B) The cash market description may, however, be confined only to those aspects relevant to particular term(s) or condition(s) that differ from an existing contract, where a contract based on the same, or a closely related, commodity is already listed for trading and is not dormant. (5) Describe any agreements or contracts entered into with other parties that enable the designated contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility to carry out its responsibilities. (6) Include the certifications required in § 41.22 of this chapter for product approval of a commodity that is a security future or a security futures product as defined in Sections 1a(31) or 1a(32) of the Act, respectively; (7) Identify with particularity information in the submission (except for the product’s terms and conditions which are made publicly available at the time of submission) that will be subject to a request for confidential treatment and support that request for confidential treatment with reasonable justification; (8) Include the filing fee required under Appendix B to this part; and (9) Include, if requested by Commission staff, additional evidence, information or data relating to whether the contract meets, initially or on a continuing basis, any of the specific requirements of the Act, or any other requirement for designation under the Act or Commission regulations or policies thereunder. * * * * * (c) Extension of time. The Commission may extend the forty-five day review period in paragraph (b) of this section for: (1) An additional forty-five days, if the product raises novel or complex VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 issues that require additional time for review or is of major economic significance, in which case, the Commission would notify the submitting registered entity within the initial forty-five day review period and would briefly describe the nature of the specific issues for which additional time for review would be required; or (2) Such extended period as the submitting registered entity so instructs the Commission in writing. * * * * * (e) Effect of non-approval. (1) * * * (2) Notification to a submitting registered entity under paragraph (d) of this section of the Commission’s refusal to approve a product shall be presumptive evidence that the entity may not truthfully certify under § 40.2 that the same, or substantially the same, product does not violate the Act or regulations thereunder. 26. Section 40.4 is proposed to be revised to read as follows: § 40.4 Amendments to terms or conditions of enumerated agricultural contracts. (a) Designated contract markets must submit for Commission approval under the procedures of § 40.5, prior to its implementation, any rule or rule amendment that, for a delivery month having open interest, would materially change a term or condition as defined in § 40.1(i), of a contract for future delivery in an agricultural commodity enumerated in Section 1a(4) of the Act, or of an option on such a contract or commodity. (b) The following rules or rule amendments are not material changes and, except as provided in paragraph (b)(9) of this section, may be reported to the Commission pursuant to the provisions of § 40.6(c): (1) Changes in trading hours; (2) Changes in lists of approved delivery facilities pursuant to previously set standards or criteria; (3) Changes to terms and conditions of options on futures other than those relating to last trading day, expiration date, option strike price delistings, and speculative position limits; (4) Reductions in the minimum price fluctuation (or ‘‘tick’’); (5) Changes required to comply with a binding order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or of a rule, regulation or order of the Commission or of another federal regulatory authority; (6) Corrections of typographical errors, renumbering, periodic routine updates to identifying information about approved entities and other such nonsubstantive revisions of a product’s terms and conditions that have no effect PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39687 on the economic characteristics of the product; (7) Fees or fee changes of less than $1.00 per contract; (8) Fees or fee changes that are $1.00 or more per contract and are established by an independent third party or are unrelated to delivery, trading, clearing or dispute resolution; and (9) Any other rule: (i) The text of which has been submitted for review to the Secretary of the Commission electronically in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission, at least ten business days prior to its implementation and that has been labeled ‘‘Non-Material Agricultural Rule Change;’’ (ii) For which the registered entity has provided an explanation as to why it considers the rule ‘‘non-material,’’ and any other information that may be beneficial to the Commission in analyzing the merits of the entity’s claim of non-materiality; and (iii) With respect to which the Commission has not notified the contract market during the review period that the rule appears to require or does require prior approval under this section. 27. Section 40.5 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (a), revising paragraph (c)(1) and revising paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows: § 40.5 Voluntary submission of rules for Commission review and approval. (a) Request for approval of rules. A registered entity may request pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the Act that the Commission approve any proposed rule or rule amendment. A submission requesting approval shall: (1) Be filed electronically with the Secretary of the Commission and at the regional office of the Commission having local jurisdiction over the registered entity in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission. (2) Include a copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in Appendix D to this part; (3) Set forth the text of the proposed rule or rule amendment (in the case of a rule amendment, deletions and additions must be indicated); (4) Describe the proposed effective date of a proposed rule and any action taken or anticipated to be taken to adopt the proposed rule by the registered entity or by its governing board or by any committee thereof, and cite the rules of the entity that authorize the adoption of the proposed rule; (5) Explain the operation, purpose, and effect of the proposed rule, including, as applicable, a description of the anticipated benefits to market E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 39688 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules participants or others, any potential anticompetitive effects on market participants or others, how the rule fits into the registered entity’s framework of self-regulation, a demonstration that the submission complies with the requirements of Appendix A to this part—Guideline No. 1, and any other information which may be beneficial to the Commission in analyzing the proposed rule. If a proposed rule affects, directly or indirectly, the application of any other rule of the submitting registered entity, set forth the pertinent text of any such rule and describe the anticipated effect; (6) Briefly describe any substantive opposing views expressed to the registered entity by governing board or committee members, members of the entity or market participants with respect to the proposed rule that were not incorporated into the proposed rule; (7) Identify any Commission regulation that the Commission may need to amend, or sections of the Act or Commission regulations that the Commission may need to interpret, in order to approve the proposed rule. To the extent that such an amendment or interpretation is necessary to accommodate a proposed rule, the submission should include a reasoned analysis supporting the amendment to the Commission regulation or the interpretation; (8) Identify with particularity information in the submission (except for a product’s terms and conditions, which are made publicly available at the time of submission) that will be subject to a request for confidential treatment and support that request for confidential treatment with reasonable justification; and (9) Include a copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in Appendix D to this part. * * * * * (c) Extensions of time. The Commission may extend the review period in paragraph (b) of this section for: (1) An additional forty-five days, if the proposed rule raises novel or complex issues that require additional time for review or is of major economic significance, in which case, the Commission would notify the submitting registered entity within the initial forty-five day review period and would briefly describe the nature of the specific issues for which additional time for review would be required; or * * * * * (e) Effect of non-approval. (1) * * * (2) Notification to a registered entity under paragraph (d) of this section of VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 the Commission’s refusal to approve a proposed rule or rule amendment of a registered entity shall be presumptive evidence that the entity may not truthfully certify that the same, or substantially the same, proposed rule or rule amendment does not violate the Act or regulations thereunder. * * * * * 28. Section 40.6 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (a) introductory text, paragraphs (a)(2), (3), and (4), paragraph (c) introductory text, and paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2)(iii) and (c)(2)(v), and by adding new paragraphs (c)(2)(vi) and (c)(3)(ii)(F) to read as follows: § 40.6 Self-certification of rules by designated contract markets and registered derivatives clearing organizations. (a) Required certification. A designated contract market or a registered derivatives clearing organization may implement any new rule or rule amendment (other than a rule or rule amendment approved or deemed approved by the Commission under § 40.5) if the following conditions have been met: (1) * * * (2) The designated contract market or registered derivatives clearing organization has filed a submission electronically for the rule or rule amendment with the Secretary of the Commission and at the regional office having local jurisdiction over the submitting registered entity in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission, and the Commission has received the submission at its headquarters by close of business on the business day preceding implementation of the rule; provided, however, rules or rule amendments implemented under procedures of the governing board to respond to an emergency as defined in § 40.1, shall, if practicable, be filed with the Commission prior to the implementation or, if not practicable, be filed with the Commission at the earliest possible time after implementation, but in no event more than 24 hours after implementation; and (3) The rule submission includes: (i) A copy of the submission cover sheet in accordance with the instructions in Appendix D to this part (in the case of a rule or rule amendment that responds to an emergency, ‘‘Emergency Rule Certification’’ should be noted in the Description section of the submission cover sheet); (ii) The text of the rule (in the case of a rule amendment, deletions and additions must be indicated); (iii) The date of implementation; PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (iv) A brief explanation of any substantive opposing views expressed to the registered entity by governing board or committee members, members of the entity or market participants, that were not incorporated into the rule; and (v) A certification by the registered entity that the rule complies with the Act and regulations thereunder. (4) The registered entity shall provide, if requested by Commission staff, additional evidence, information or data that may be beneficial to the Commission in conducting a due diligence assessment of the certification filing and the entity’s compliance with any of the requirements of the Act or Commission regulations or policies thereunder. * * * * * (c) Notification of rule amendments. Notwithstanding the rule certification requirement of Section 5c(c)(1) of the Act, and paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, a designated contract market or a registered derivatives clearing organization may place the following rules or rule amendments into effect without certification to the Commission if the following conditions are met: (1) The designated contract market or registered derivatives clearing organization provides to the Commission at least weekly a summary notice of all rule changes made effective pursuant to this paragraph during the preceding week. Such notice must be labeled ‘‘Weekly Notification of Rule Changes’’ and need not be filed for weeks during which no such actions have been taken. One copy of each such submission shall be furnished electronically in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission; and (2) * * * (iii) Index products. Routine changes in the composition, computation, or method of selection of component entities of an index (other than a stock index) referenced and defined in the product’s terms, that do not affect the pricing basis of the index, which are made by an independent third party whose business relates to the collection or dissemination of price information and which was not formed solely for the purpose of compiling an index for use in connection with a futures or option product; * * * * * (v) Fees. Fees or fee changes that are $1.00 or more per contract and are established by an independent third party or are unrelated to delivery, trading, clearing or dispute resolution. (vi) Survey lists. Changes to lists of banks, brokers, dealers, or other entities E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules that provide price or cash market information to an independent third party and that are incorporated by reference as product terms. (3) * * * (ii) * * * (F) Securities Indexes. Routine changes to the composition, computation or method of security selection of an index that is referenced and defined in the product’s rules, and which are made by an independent third party. 29. Section 40.7 is proposed to be amended by adding paragraphs (a)(3) and (b)(3) to read as follows: contract market, registered derivatives transaction execution facility, or registered derivatives clearing organization to the Secretary of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, at submissions@cftc.gov in a format specified by the Secretary of the Commission. Each submission should include the following: § 40.7 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Delegations. (a) Procedural matters * * * (3) The Commission hereby delegates to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight or to the Director’s delegatee, with the concurrence of the General Counsel or the General Counsel’s delegatee, the authority to notify a designated contract market that a rule change submitted for materiality determination under § 40.4(b)(9) is material and must be submitted for the Commission’s prior approval. (b) Approval authority. * * * (3) Establish or amend speculative limits or position accountability provisions that are in compliance with the requirements of the Act and Commission regulations; * * * * * 30. Section 40.8 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 40.8 Availability of public information. * * * * * (b) Any information required to be made publicly available by a registered entity under Sections 5(d)(7), 5a(d)(4) and 5b(c)(2)(L) of the Act, respectively, will be treated as public information by the Commission at the time an order of designation or registration is issued by the Commission, a registered entity is deemed to be designated or registered, or a rule or rule amendment of the registered entity is approved or deemed to be approved by the Commission or can first be made effective the day following its certification by the registered entity. 31. Appendix D to Part 40— Submission Cover Sheet and Instructions is proposed to be amended by revising the first paragraph to read as follows: Appendix D to Part 40—Submission Cover Sheet and Instructions A properly completed submission cover sheet must accompany all rule submissions submitted electronically by a designated VerDate jul<14>2003 14:31 Jul 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, this first day of July, 2005, by the Commission. Jean A. Webb, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–13467 Filed 7–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 20 CFR Part 416 [Regulations No.16] RIN–0960–AG00 Rules for Helping Blind and Disabled Individuals Achieve Self-Support Social Security Administration. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend our regulations to implement section 203 of the Social Security Independence and Program Improvements Act of 1994. Section 203 of this law amended section 1633 of the Social Security Act to require us to establish by regulations criteria for time limits and other criteria related to plans to achieve self-support (PASS). The law requires that the time limits take into account the length of time that a person needs to achieve his or her employment goal, within a reasonable period, and other factors as determined by the Commissioner to be appropriate. A PASS allows some people who receive or are eligible for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) disability benefits to set aside part of their income and/or resources to meet an employment goal. The income and/or resources set aside under a PASS will not be counted in determining the amount of the person’s SSI payment or his or her eligibility. DATES: To be sure that your comments are considered, we must receive them by September 9, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may give us your comments by using: Our Internet site facility (i.e., Social Security Online) at https://policy.ssa.gov/pnpublic.nsf/ LawsRegs or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov; email to regulations@ssa.gov; telefax to (410) 966–2830, or letter to the Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703, Baltimore, MD 21235–7703. You may also deliver them to the Office PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39689 of Regulations, Social Security Administration, 100 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days. Comments are posted on our Internet site, or you may inspect them on regular business days by making arrangements with the contact person shown in this preamble. Electronic Version: The electronic file of this document is available on the date of publication in the Federal Register at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/ index.html. It is also available on the Internet site for SSA (i.e., Social Security Online): https://policy.ssa.gov/ pnpublic.nsf/LawsRegs. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hoover, Policy Analyst, Office of Program Development and Research, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401. Call (410) 965–5651 or TTY 1–800–325–0778 for information about these proposed rules. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number 1–(800) 772–1213 or TTY 1– (800) 325–0778. You may also contact Social Security Online at https:// www.socialsecurity.gov/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: What Is the Purpose of This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)? In this NPRM, we propose to amend our regulations to implement section 203 of the Social Security Independence and Program Improvements Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103–296). This law amended section 1633 of the Social Security Act to provide that, as of January 1, 1995, in establishing time limits and other criteria related to a PASS, we take into account the length of time that you will need to achieve your employment goal, within a reasonable period, and other factors as determined by the Commissioner to be appropriate. This requirement for a more individualized time limit voided the time limit requirements for PASS in our existing regulations, which provided for an initial period of not more than 18 months, an extension of up to an additional 18 months, and a maximum of 48 months. We propose to revise the current rules to take into account your individual needs and your employment goal in determining what a reasonable length of time is to achieve your employment goal. These proposed revisions will add language to some of our rules describing the information that must be contained in a PASS. They will clarify requirements currently in our PASS rules and operating procedures. E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1

Agencies

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39672-39689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13467]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40


Technical and Clarifying Amendments to Rules for Exempt Markets, 
Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities and Designated Contract 
Markets, and Procedural Changes for Derivatives Clearing Organization 
Registration Applications

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rules.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 10, 2001, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
(``Commission'') published final rules implementing the provisions of 
the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (``CFMA'') relating to 
trading facilities.\1\ The amendments proposed herein are intended to 
clarify and codify acceptable practices under the rules for trading 
facilities, based on the Commission's experience over the intervening 
four years in applying those rules, including the adoption of several 
amendments to the original rules over the same period. The proposed 
amendments also would make various technical corrections and conforming 
amendments to the rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 66 FR 42256, August 10, 2001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed amendments would revise the application 
and review process for registration as a derivatives clearing 
organization (``DCO'') by eliminating the presumption of automatic 
fast-track review of applications and replacing it with the presumption 
that all applications will be reviewed pursuant to the 180-day 
timeframe and procedures specified in section 6(a) of the Commodity 
Exchange Act (``CEA'' or ``Act''). In lieu of the current 60-day 
automatic fast-track review, the Commission is proposing to permit 
applicants to request expedited review

[[Page 39673]]

and to be registered as a DCO by affirmative Commission action not 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
later than 90 days after the Commission receives the application.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 9, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20581, attention: Office of the Secretariat. Comments may be sent by 
facsimile transmission to 202-418-5521 or, by e-mail to 
secretary@cftc.gov. Reference should be made to ``Proposed Clarifying 
Amendments for Exempt Markets, Derivatives Transaction Execution 
Facilities and Designated Contract Markets, and Procedural Changes for 
Derivatives Clearing Organization Registration Applications.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Heitman, Senior Special Counsel 
(telephone 202-418-5041, e-mail dheitman@cftc.gov), Division of Market 
Oversight, or Lois Gregory, Special Counsel (telephone 202-418-5521, e-
mail lgregory@cftc.gov), Division of Clearing and Intermediary 
Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 
Center, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The CFMA amended the Commodity Exchange Act (the ``Act'') to 
profoundly alter federal regulation of commodity futures and option 
markets. The new statutory framework created by the CFMA established 
two categories of markets subject to Commission regulatory oversight, 
designated contract markets (``DCMs'') and registered derivatives 
transaction execution facilities (``DTEFs''), and two categories of 
exempt markets, exempt boards of trade (``EBOTs'') and exempt 
commercial markets (``ECMs''). The original rules applicable to these 
trading facilities \2\ established administrative procedures necessary 
to implement the CFMA, interpreted certain of the CFMA's provisions, 
and provided guidance on compliance with various of the CFMA's 
requirements. In addition, the Commission, under the general exemptive 
authority of section 4(c) of the Act, in a limited number of instances 
provided relief from, or greater flexibility than, the CFMA's 
provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, over the four years during which these new rules for 
trading facilities have been in effect, they have been amended several 
times.\3\ The amendments proposed herein are intended to clarify and 
codify acceptable practices under the Commission's rules for trading 
facilities, as amended, based on the Commission's experience in 
applying those rules over the last four years. The proposed amendments 
also would make a number of technical and clarifying corrections and 
conforming amendments to enhance the consistency and clarity of the 
rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See, for example: Regulation To Restrict Dual Trading in 
Security Futures Products, 67 FR 11223 (March 15, 2002); Changes in 
Divisional Structure and Delegations of Authority, 67 FR 62350 
(October 7, 2002); Amendments to New Regulatory Framework for 
Trading Facilities and Clearing Organizations, 67 FR 62873 (October 
9, 2002); Exempt Commercial Markets, 69 FR 43285 (July 20, 2004); 
Confidential Information and Commission Records and Information, 69 
FR 67503 (November 18, 2004); and Application Procedures for 
Registration as a Derivatives Transaction Execution Facility or 
Designation as a Contract Market, 69 FR 67811 (November 22, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It should also be noted that the Commission has provided 
information that may be helpful to those subject to the rules for 
trading facilities on its Web site at https://www.cftc.gov. In 
particular, the website includes charts setting out information that 
may be helpful in: (1) Complying with the registration criteria as a 
DTEF (see Appendix A to part 37); (2) complying with the designation 
criteria as a DCM (see Appendix A to part 38); and (3) complying with 
the requirements for designation of physical delivery futures contracts 
(see Appendix A to part 40--Guideline No. 1). While these charts are 
not intended to be used as mandatory checklists, they may provide 
helpful guidance to those subject to the regulations governing trading 
facilities.
    In addition, the Commission is proposing to revise the application 
and review procedures for registration as a DCO. Specifically, the 
Commission is proposing to eliminate the presumption of automatic fast-
track review of applications and replace it with the presumption that 
all applications will be reviewed pursuant to the 180-day timeframe and 
procedures specified in section 6(a) of the Act. In lieu of the 
automatic fast-track review (under which applicants were deemed to be 
registered as DCOs 60 days after receipt of an application), the 
Commission is proposing to permit applicants to request expedited 
review and to be registered as a DCO by the Commission not later than 
90 days after the date of receipt of the application. The Commission is 
also proposing, among other things, to provide that review under the 
expedited review procedures may be terminated if it appears that the 
application is materially incomplete, raises novel or complex issues 
that require additional time for review, or has undergone substantive 
amendment or supplementation during the review period. The Commission 
is proposing these amendments based upon its experience in processing 
applications and in light of administrative practices that have been 
implemented since the rules were first adopted. These amendments would 
establish procedures substantially similar, where appropriate, to those 
recently amended in parts 37 and 38 for processing applications for 
registration of derivatives transaction execution facilities and 
contract market designation, respectively.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 69 FR 67811, November 22, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. The Proposed Amendments

A. Part 36--Exempt Markets

    Sections 36.2(b) and 36.3(a) would be amended by deleting the 
reference to ``hard copy'' in the provisions requiring trading 
facilities operating as EBOTs and ECMs, respectively, to notify the 
Commission. In order to simplify and modernize the notification 
process, the amended rules would require that such notifications may 
only be filed electronically. Similar amendments are proposed in other 
sections requiring notifications or filings with the Commission, so 
that under the amended rules, all formal filings from ECMs, EBOTs, 
DTEFs, DCMs and DCOs must be filed electronically.
    Section 36.2(c)(2), relating to market data dissemination for 
EBOTs, would be revised. Sections 2(h)(4)(D) and 5d(d) of the Act 
include similar language requiring ECMs and EBOTs, respectively, to 
daily disseminate certain basic trading information in the event either 
market becomes a significant source of price discovery for the 
underlying cash market for any commodity traded on the ECM or EBOT. The 
previously noted amendments to the rules applicable to ECMs \5\ 
established clear procedures for ECMs to follow in complying with the 
price discovery/price dissemination requirement, by: (1) Providing 
criteria for making a price discovery determination; (2) requiring ECMs 
that meet those criteria and thus are performing a price discovery 
function to inform the Commission; (3) establishing procedures for the 
Commission to make a formal price discovery determination; (4) setting 
out the types of information

[[Page 39674]]

an ECM that serves a price discovery function must disseminate; and (5) 
establishing procedures for modifying a price discovery determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 69 FR 43285 (July 20, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules would amend Sec.  36.2(c)(2) to implement price 
discovery/price dissemination rules for EBOTs that closely parallel the 
price discovery/price dissemination rules currently applicable to ECMs. 
The wording of the Act's price discovery/price dissemination provision 
for EBOTs is substantially similar, although not identical, to the 
provision applicable to ECMs. However, both provisions are identical in 
their ultimate purpose. Furthermore, the regulatory provision 
applicable to ECMs has recently gone through the public comment 
process. Finally, parallel provisions would be easier for the industry 
to apply, since the price discovery/price dissemination rules would be 
essentially identical for both types of exempt markets.
    The proposed rules would also add new Sec. Sec.  36.2(c)(3) and 
36.3(c)(4) requiring EBOTs and ECMs, respectively, to annually file a 
notice with the Commission, no later than the end of each calendar 
year. The notice must include a statement that the entity continues to 
operate under the exemption and a certification that the information in 
its original notification of operation is still correct. Annual 
notification of operation by the facility would allow the Commission to 
track whether facilities that notified the Commission of their intent 
to operate actually commenced operations and would allow the Commission 
to eliminate inactive facilities from any listing of active EBOTs or 
ECMs maintained on its Web site.

B. Part 37--Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities

    Section 37.1(a) would be amended to make clear that the provisions 
of Part 37 apply not only to boards of trade operating as registered 
DTEFs, but also to applicants for registration as DTEFs.
    Section 37.2 would be revised to identify certain reserved 
provisions of the Commission's regulations that specifically and 
comprehensively reference DTEFs separately from other reserved 
provisions that do not. The proposed revisions also would make clear 
that all the references in Sec.  37.2 to reserved provisions of the 
regulations applicable to DTEFs also include related definitions and 
cross-referenced sections cited in those reserved provisions. Finally, 
Sec.  1.60 would be added to the list of reserved provisions of the 
regulations applicable to DTEFs under Sec.  37.2 to make clear that 
DTEFs need to notify the Commission of any material legal proceeding to 
which the DTEF is a party or to which its property or assets are 
subject.
    In Sec.  37.3, subparagraph (a)(5) would be renumbered as 
subparagraph (b) and the remaining subparagraphs would be renumbered 
accordingly.
    Section 37.6, Compliance with Core Principles, would be revised to 
harmonize DTEF core principle compliance with the previously noted new 
application procedures for DCMs and DTEFs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 69 FR 67811 (November 22, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    New Sec.  37.6(c)(2) would be added delegating to the Division of 
Market Oversight (the ``Division'') the authority under Sec.  
37.6(c)(1) to request additional information in reviewing a DTEF's 
continued compliance with one or more core principles, or to enable the 
Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act. The delegation 
provision notes that the Commission, at its election, may exercise the 
delegated authority directly. A similar delegation would be made in new 
Sec.  38.5(c) to allow the Division to request additional information 
in reviewing a DCM's continued compliance with designation criteria and 
core principles, or to enable the Commission to satisfy its obligations 
under the Act. The foregoing delegated authority would also extend to 
other requests by Commission staff to DTEFs or DCMs for additional 
information: (1) Under new Sec.  40.2(b), regarding compliance with 
respect to new products listed by certification; (2) under Sec.  
40.3(a)(9), regarding voluntary submission of new products for 
Commission review and approval; and (3) under new Sec.  40.6(a)(4), 
regarding compliance with respect to self-certified rules. This 
delegated authority would aid the staff in reviewing DTEF and DCM 
compliance with the requirements of the Act or Commission regulations 
or policies thereunder without involving the Commission in the 
mechanics of day-to-day due diligence oversight.
    In addition, the guidance in current Sec.  37.6(d) would be deleted 
as duplicative of ``Appendix B to Part 37--Guidance on Compliance with 
Core Principles'' and would be replaced with a reference to Appendix B.
    Section 37.8(b), regarding special calls for information, would be 
amended to make clear that the section applies not only to futures 
commission merchants, but to foreign brokers (as defined in Sec.  
15.00) as well.
    The title of Appendix A to part 37 would be reworded to read, 
``Appendix A to part 37--Guidance on Compliance with Registration 
Criteria,'' to be consistent with the wording of the titles of the 
other appendices to parts 37 and 38. The introductory paragraph of the 
appendix also would be revised to make clear that registration criteria 
guidance applies both to new registrants that register by application 
and to DTEFs operated by DCMs, which would not need to file an 
application, but could become registered by notification/certification. 
The revised language also is consistent with the requirement that the 
registration criteria must be met initially and on an ongoing basis, 
rather than just upon application.
    In Appendix B to part 37, subsection 1 of the appendix would be 
revised to make clear that the guidance therein applies to all 
registered DTEFs, whether they come in by notification under Sec.  
37.5(a) or by application. Subsection 3 of the appendix would be 
revised to make clear that, consistent with Sec.  37.6(b)(2), the 
guidance therein applies to applicants for registration, rather than 
registered DTEFs.
    Core Principle 5 of Appendix B to part 37, ``Daily Publication of 
Trading Information,'' would be revised in a manner consistent with the 
price discovery/price dissemination provisions applicable to EBOTs and 
ECMs, which are not as comprehensive as those applicable to DCMs. This 
reflects the fact that DTEFs are subject to a different informational 
standard than DCMs. DCMs are subject to a blanket requirement, under 
Core Principle 8 of Appendix B to part 38, to publish daily trading 
information for all actively traded contracts. DTEFs, however, are 
subject to Core Principle 5 (section 5a(d)(5) of the Act), which 
includes language similar to that applicable to EBOTs and ECMs (under 
sections 5d(d) and 2(h)(4)(D) of the Act, respectively) requiring DTEFs 
to make public certain daily trading information only if the Commission 
determines that contracts traded on the facility perform a significant 
price discovery function for transactions in the cash market for the 
commodity underlying the contracts. The revised core principle 
explanatory language would apply to DTEFs the same standards that would 
apply to EBOTs and ECMs (see Sec. Sec.  36.2(b)(2) and 36.3(c)(2), 
respectively) whereby a DTEF would perform a significant price 
discovery function if: (1) Cash market bids, offers or transactions are 
directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the prices generated 
on the market on a more than occasional basis; or (2) the market's 
prices are routinely disseminated in a widely distributed industry 
publication and are routinely consulted by industry participants in 
pricing cash market transactions. If the

[[Page 39675]]

Commission has reason to believe that a DTEF may meet either of these 
standards, or if the facility holds itself out to the public as 
performing a price discovery function, the Commission will notify the 
DTEF and provide it with an opportunity for a hearing through the 
submission of written data, views and arguments. If, after considering 
all relevant matters, the Commission finds that the DTEF meets the 
price discovery standards, it will direct the DTEF to publish daily 
trading information in accordance with the core principle. The 
information could be published by providing it to a financial 
information service or by placing it on the facility's website. The 
information should be made available to the public without charge no 
later than the business day following the day to which the information 
pertains.

C. Part 38--Designated Contract Markets

    In Sec.  38.1, language would be added to make clear that the 
provisions of part 38 apply to applicants for designation as well as to 
already designated contract markets, and redundant and inapplicable 
references would be deleted.
    In Sec.  38.2, language would be added to make clear that the 
references therein to reserved provisions of the regulations applicable 
to DCMs also include related definitions and cross-referenced sections 
cited in those reserved provisions. Similar clarifying amendments, 
reserving the applicability of related definitions and cross-referenced 
sections, appear in other sections of the proposal. Also, Sec.  1.60 
would be added to the list of reserved provisions of the regulations 
applicable to DCMs under Sec.  38.2 to make clear that DCMs need to 
notify the Commission of any material legal proceeding to which the DCM 
is a party or to which its property or assets are subject.
    In Sec.  38.5, subparagraph (b) would be amended to make clear that 
DCMs are required to comply with both the designation criteria and the 
core principles, initially and on an ongoing basis, and to conform its 
language to Sec.  37.6(c)(1). As noted in the discussion of new Sec.  
37.6(c)(2) above, new Sec.  38.5(c) would be added, delegating to the 
Division of Market Oversight the authority under Sec.  38.5(b) to 
request additional information in reviewing a DCM's continued 
compliance with designation criteria or core principles, or to enable 
the Commission to satisfy its obligations under the Act.
    The title of Appendix A to part 38 would be revised to refer to 
``Guidance on Compliance with Designation Criteria,'' and the 
introductory paragraph of the appendix would be revised in conformity 
with the revisions to the introductory paragraph of Appendix A to part 
37, to make clear that the obligation to comply with the designation 
criteria applies not just to applicants, but is ongoing.
    Designation Criterion 7 under Appendix A to part 38 would be 
updated to provide, consistent with the wording of other provisions 
regarding designation criteria and core principles, that a DCM 
``should'' (rather than ``may'') provide information to the public by 
placing the information on its Web site.
    In Appendix B to part 38, language would be added in subparagraph 
(1) to harmonize part 38, Appendices A and B, with part 37, Appendices 
A and B, consistent with the idea that the obligation to comply with 
the core principles applies both initially and on an ongoing basis. In 
subparagraph (2), a reference to ``selected'' requirements of the core 
principles would be added to make clear that the enumerated acceptable 
practices under each core principle are neither the complete nor the 
exclusive requirements for meeting that core principle. With respect to 
the completeness issue, the selected requirements in the acceptable 
practices section of a particular core principle may not address all 
the requirements necessary for compliance with the core principle. With 
respect to the exclusivity issue, the acceptable practices that are 
listed for a particular core principle requirement are for illustrative 
purposes only and do not state the only means of satisfying the 
particular requirement they address. There may be other ways of 
complying with that requirement of the core principle that would also 
be acceptable.
    Under Core Principle 2 of Appendix B to part 38, a reference would 
be added in subparagraph (a)(1) to clarify that a DCM could carry out 
trade practice surveillance programs through delegation or 
``contracting out.'' A delegation confers upon another the authority to 
act in the delegating authority's name. A third party contractor would 
not act in the DCM's name, but the DCM would be required to maintain 
sufficient control over the contractor because it would remain the 
DCM's responsibility to assure that the DCM's obligations under the Act 
were met.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See the discussion in 66 FR 42256, at 42266 (August 10, 
2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Core Principle 6 of Appendix B, ``Emergency Authority,'' the 
language now appearing under subparagraph (b), ``Acceptable 
Practices,'' would be moved to subparagraph (a), ``Application 
Guidance.'' This amendment would reflect that the language moved to 
subparagraph (a) more accurately describes guidance on establishing 
rules to exercise emergency authority in the first instance, rather 
than acceptable practices in implementing such rules.
    Under Core Principle 7 of Appendix B, guidance would be added in 
subparagraph (b) as to what constitutes ``timely placement'' of 
information on a DCM's Web site. In noting that the DCM's rulebook 
should be ``available to the public,'' the intent of the subparagraph 
is that the rulebook should be freely accessible to anyone who visits 
the Web site without the need to register, log in, provide a user name 
or obtain a password.
    Core Principle 8 of Appendix B requires that a DCM shall make 
public daily information on settlement prices, volume, open interest, 
and opening and closing ranges for actively traded contracts. New 
language would be added to subparagraph (b), Acceptable Practices, 
whereby compliance with Sec.  16.01 of the Commission's regulations, 
which is mandatory since Sec.  16.01 is one of the sections reserved 
under Sec.  38.2, would constitute an acceptable practice under Core 
Principle 8. All currently designated DCMs are in compliance with Sec.  
16.01.
    Under Core Principle 16 of Appendix B, paragraph (a) would be 
revised to refer to a contract market's board (rather than the contract 
market as a whole) in conformity with the language of the core 
principle.

D. Part 39--Derivatives Clearing Organizations

    The Commission adopted the application procedures specified in 
Commission Regulation 39.3 \8\ for organizations applying to be 
registered as DCOs in 2001 when it first implemented the CFMA.\9\ These 
procedures presume that an application will be submitted and reviewed 
pursuant to a fast-track procedure under which an organization is 
deemed to be designated as a DCO 60 days after submitting its 
application,\10\ unless notified otherwise during the review period. 
DCO registration procedures are not subject to any statutory deadline 
under section 6(a) of the Act, which only applies to DCMs and DTEFs.

[[Page 39676]]

However, the fast-track review period is substantially shorter than the 
180-day review period specified in section 6(a) of the Act for DCMs and 
DTEFs. The rules provide procedures for terminating the fast-track 
review, including termination by the Commission if it appears that the 
application's form or substance fails to meet the requirements of the 
Commission's regulations.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 39.3.
    \9\ See 66 FR 45604 (August 29, 2001). The CFMA, Appendix E of 
Pub. L. 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763, substantially revised the Commodity 
Exchange Act (Act or CEA), 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.
    \10\ 17 CFR 39.3(a).
    \11\ 17 CFR 39.3(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The application procedures also generally identify information 
required to be included in applications for registration as a DCO \12\, 
and identify where additional guidance for applicants can be found.\13\ 
The rules also provide procedures for the withdrawal of an application 
for registration \14\ and specify the extent of the delegation of 
authority from the Commission to the Director of the Division of 
Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, with the concurrence of the 
General Counsel, with respect to, among other things, the termination 
of expedited review procedures.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 39.3(a).
    \13\ 17 CFR 39.3(d).
    \14\ 17 CFR 39.3(c).
    \15\ 17 CFR 39.3(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is proposing to modify the application procedures in 
a number of respects. Most of these modifications mirror changes 
recently made to parts 37 and 38 regarding, among other things, the 
review and processing of applications for registration of DTEFs and 
DCMs. With respect to the review period for applications generally, it 
is proposing to establish, as it recently has under parts 37 and 38, 
the presumption that all applications are submitted for review under 
the 180-day timeframe specified in section 6(a) of the Act for DCMs and 
DTEFs.\16\ An expedited 90-day review could be requested by the 
applicant, in which case the Commission would register the applicant as 
a DCO during or by the end of the 90-day period unless the Commission 
terminated the expedited review for certain specifically identified 
reasons. In comparison to the current rules, the Commission is 
proposing to lengthen the expedited review periods for DCO applications 
by 30 days. The Commission believes, based upon its experience in 
processing DCO applications and in light of certain administrative 
practices that have developed since these rules were first adopted, 
that these potentially longer review periods are necessary to ensure a 
comprehensive review of applications and to meet other public policy 
objectives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Under the current rules, DCO applications are routinely 
reviewed under the fast-track procedures unless the applicant 
instructs the Commission in writing at the time of the submission of 
the application or during the review period to review the 
application pursuant to the time provisions of and procedures under 
section 6 of the Act. See 17 CFR 39.3(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has reviewed nine DCO applications since passage of 
the CFMA. The applications themselves are large and contain technical 
documents describing operations and operational outsourcing agreements. 
The applications frequently need to be substantially amended or 
supplemented in various ways and generate a series of questions by 
Commission staff responsible for reviewing the applications. In 
addition, a new Commission policy to promote transparency in Commission 
operations, implemented in August of 2003, provides for the posting of 
all such applications on the Commission's Web site for a period of at 
least 15 days for public review and comment.\17\ This will lengthen the 
review process. The proposed 90-day review period should provide the 
Commission with sufficient time to review these substantial 
applications and to respond to any public comments. The Commission 
notes that the proposed 90-day review period, while longer than the 
current fast-track review periods, would continue to be substantially 
shorter than the 180-day review period set forth in section 6(a) for 
DCMs and DTEFs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Commission has recently proposed revisions to 
Commission Regulation 40.8 to specify which portions of an 
application for registration as a DTEF or designation as a DCO will 
be made public. See 69 FR 44981 (July 28, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also is proposing to modify its internal processing 
procedures under which an applicant would be registered as a DCO. Under 
the proposal, an applicant would no longer be deemed to be registered 
based upon the passage of time (currently 60 days for DCOs). If the 
applicant requested expedited review, the Commission would take 
affirmative action to register or designate the applicant as a DCO, 
subject to conditions if appropriate, not later than 90 days after 
receipt of the application, unless the Commission terminated the 
expedited review. Thus, registration as a DCO would involve affirmative 
action by the Commission, which would normally be in the form of 
issuance of a Commission order. It should be noted that it would be 
possible, under the proposed procedures, for applicants who submit 
applications that are complete and not amended or supplemented during 
the review period to be designated as a DCO in less than 90 days.
    With respect to the termination of expedited review, the rules 
provide that fast-track review may be terminated because the 
application's form or substance fails to meet the requirements of part 
39 or upon written instruction of the applicant during the review 
period. Based upon its experience in reviewing applications submitted 
to date and in light of its new practice of posting all such 
applications on the Commission's website for public review and comment, 
the Commission is proposing to clarify and expand the rationale for 
terminating expedited review. In addition to the reasons for 
termination cited above, the Commission is proposing that the expedited 
review period be terminated if the application is materially incomplete 
or, as more fully described below, undergoes major amendment or 
supplementation. The Commission is also proposing to provide for 
termination of expedited review if an application raises novel or 
complex issues that require additional time for review. This proposal 
is responsive to the public interest that the Commission has witnessed 
to date with respect to DCO applications and is substantially the same 
as a proposal recently adopted for DCMs and DTEFs.
    The Commission is further proposing to delete the provision of the 
rules that would require the Commission, upon terminating fast-track 
review, to commence a proceeding to deny a DCO application upon the 
request of the applicant. This procedure has proved to be unnecessary 
to date, and an analogous procedure is available under the statutory 
review procedure.\18\ Finally, the Commission is proposing to amend the 
expedited review procedures to expressly provide that expedited review 
would be terminated if an applicant so requests in writing. The 
Commission stresses that if expedited review were terminated for any of 
the reasons cited above, the application would continue to be reviewed 
pursuant to the 180-day procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 7 U.S.C. 8(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To further enhance the application process, the Commission is 
proposing to more completely identify the information required to be 
provided by an applicant under both the 180-day and the expedited 90-
day review procedures. The proposal would make it clear that all 
applicants would be required to submit for review an executed or 
executable copy of any agreements or contracts entered into or to be 
entered into by the applicant that enable the applicant to comply with 
the core principles. Final, signed copies of such documents would be 
required to be submitted prior to registration. The initial application 
would be required to

[[Page 39677]]

include something more than a letter of intent or draft contract or 
agreement, such as a final contract or agreement signed by at least one 
of the parties. While the Commission understands that applicants may 
prefer to defer the finalization of contracts in order to defer 
associated costs until registration or designation, it must balance 
that preference against the assurance that a contract or agreement will 
actually be executed prior to registration.
    With respect to the additional information that would be required 
to be submitted as part of the application, the rule requires that 
applicants demonstrate how they are able to satisfy each of the core 
principles specified in section 5b of the Act. The proposal would amend 
the rule to eliminate the proviso, ``to the extent it is not self-
evident from the applicant's rules.'' Based upon experience in 
reviewing DCO applications, the Commission recognizes that this 
additional information is necessary for Commission review of the 
application when determining whether the applicant satisfies the core 
principles. The proposal would eliminate the requirement that the 
applicant support requests for confidential treatment of information 
included in the application with reasonable justification. The 
Commission believes that the procedures provided in Commission 
Regulation 145.9, ``Petition for confidential treatment of information 
submitted to the Commission,'' should be followed by all applicants.
    Under the proposal, the items required to be included in an 
application to be reviewed under the 180-day review procedures would be 
identical to those required to be included in an application to be 
reviewed under the expedited review procedures with the following 
additional requirements for the expedited review procedure: (1) An 
applicant must request expedited review; and (2) an application 
submitted for expedited review must not be amended or supplemented by 
the applicant, except as requested by the Commission or for correction 
of typographical errors, renumbering or other nonsubstantive revisions. 
The proposal provides that amending or supplementing an application in 
a manner that is inconsistent with the above provision would result in 
termination of the expedited review.
    The Commission is also proposing to modify the delegation of 
authority provisions applicable to applications for registration as a 
DCO. Currently, the rules provide for the delegation of authority to 
the Director of the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, 
with the concurrence of the General Counsel: (1) To terminate the 
review of both fast-track applications and those reviewed under the 
180-day procedure; and (2) to register an applicant as a DCO subject to 
conditions. The Commission is proposing to modify and standardize the 
delegation of authority as it applies to DCO applicants. Thus, under 
the proposal, the Commission would also delegate to the Director of the 
Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, with the concurrence 
of the General Counsel, the authority to stay the running of the 180-
day review period for applications if they are materially incomplete, 
as is provided under section 6(a) of the Act. Because one result of the 
proposed amendments would be that registration as a DCO would involve 
affirmative action on the part of the Commission, the proposal would 
rescind the delegation of the authority to designate the applicant as a 
DCO subject to conditions.
    The Commission also is adding a provision for vacation of DCO 
registration. Under this provision, a registered DCO may vacate its 
registration under section 7 of the Act by filing a request with the 
Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters. Vacation of registration 
will not affect any action taken or to be taken by the Commission based 
upon actions, activities or events occurring during the time that the 
DCO was registered with the Commission. A similar provision with 
respect to contract markets is already part of part 38.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 38.3(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Commission is proposing to make minor word changes and 
deletions in order to clarify requirements and procedures.
    The Commission continues to encourage applicants to consult with 
Commission staff prior to formally submitting an application for DCO 
registration to help ensure that an application, once submitted, will 
be able to be reviewed in a timely manner. The Commission encourages 
interested parties, particularly prior applicants, to comment upon 
these proposals.

E. Part 40--Provisions Common to Contract Markets, Derivatives 
Transaction Execution Facilities and Derivatives Clearing Organizations

    In Sec.  40.1, the definitions therein would be redesignated as 
numbered subparagraphs, beginning with subparagraph (a). In 
redesignated subparagraphs 40.1(b)-(e), the definitions of dormant 
contract/product, dormant contract market, dormant derivatives clearing 
organization and dormant derivatives transaction execution facility, 
respectively, the length of time during which no trading (or clearing) 
has occurred before dormancy could be declared would be extended from 
six to twelve calendar months. Also, in Sec.  40.1(b), in the proviso 
granting a 36-month grace period after initial certification or 
Commission approval before a contract/product can be considered 
dormant, language would be added to make clear that, if the DCM or DTEF 
itself becomes dormant prior to the running of the 36-month period, the 
contract/product would likewise be considered dormant. Finally, 
language would be added to Sec.  40.1(b) to allow a board of trade to 
self-declare a contract/product to be dormant at any time after initial 
certification or Commission approval.
    Under new Sec.  40.1(f), a definition of ``dormant rule'' would be 
added whereby a new rule or rule amendment that is not made effective 
and implemented within twelve months of initial certification or 
Commission approval would be considered dormant and would have to be 
resubmitted, either by certification or for approval, before it could 
be implemented.
    Sections 40.2, 40.3, 40.5 and 40.6 would be revised for internal 
consistency between sections. In addition, in Sec.  40.2, relating to 
listing new products for trading by certification, new subparagraph 
40.2(b) would make clear that a registered entity shall provide, if 
requested by Commission staff, additional evidence, information or data 
relating to whether the contract meets, initially or on a continuing 
basis, any of the requirements of the Act or Commission regulations or 
policies thereunder. Such evidence may be beneficial to the Commission 
in conducting a due diligence assessment of the product and the 
registered entity's compliance with these requirements, including the 
obligation that the registered entity must have reason to believe the 
certification is proper. This language is consistent with the 
Commission's obligation to assure that the Act and Commission 
regulations and policies thereunder are not being violated. Similar 
language would be added in Sec.  40.3(a)(9) with respect to voluntary 
submission of new products for approval, and in Sec. 40.6(a)(4) with 
respect to self-certification of rules by DCMs and DTEFs. DCMs and 
DTEFs should be aware that, in conducting routine due diligence reviews 
of self-certified new product listings and new rules or rule amendments 
under Sec.  40.2(b) and Sec.  40.6(a)(4), respectively, the staff gives 
special consideration to

[[Page 39678]]

particular requirements. For DTEFs, the key requirements are: Sec.  
5a(b)(2) of the Act (requirements for underlying commodities); Core 
Principle 3 (monitoring trading to assure an orderly market); and Core 
Principle 4 (disclosure of general information). For DCMs, the key 
requirements are: Core Principle 3 (listing contracts that are not 
readily susceptible to manipulation); Core Principle 4 (monitoring 
trading to prevent manipulation, price distortion or disruptions of the 
delivery or cash-settlement process); and Core Principle 5 (adopting 
position limits or position accountability rules to reduce the threat 
of market manipulation or distortion, especially in the delivery 
month). To the extent that a DCM or DTEF includes with its initial 
submission, data, research reports, trade interview reports, exchange 
or third party analyses, or other background information demonstrating 
compliance with these requirements, a DTEF or DCM can minimize the 
prospect of requests for additional information under Sec.  40.2(b) or 
Sec.  40.6(a)(4), respectively.
    The proposed revisions to Sec.  40.3 would set forth with greater 
particularity the information Commission staff needs to make a 
determination on whether to approve a new product voluntarily submitted 
for Commission review and approval.
    Section 5c(c)(2)(B) of the Act and Sec.  40.4 of the regulations 
require prior Commission approval of DCM rule amendments that, for a 
delivery month having open interest, would materially change a term or 
condition of a contract for future delivery of an enumerated 
agricultural commodity, or an option on such a contract or 
commodity.\20\ The proposal would add new subsection 40.4(b)(8) to 
include fees or fee changes that are $1.00 or more per contract and are 
established by an independent third party or are unrelated to delivery, 
trading, clearing or dispute resolution to the types of rule changes 
for which a materiality determination is not required. The proposal 
would also make clear that the non-material changes described in Sec.  
40.4(b), subparagraphs (1)-(8), would fall within the provisions of 
revised Sec.  40.6(c) and would be subject to the weekly notification 
procedures set out therein. Also, in Sec.  40.4(b)(9) under 
subparagraph (i), the deadline for Commission review of ``non-material 
agricultural rule changes'' would be changed from 10 calendar days to 
10 business days to provide for a consistent review period for all 
submissions and to allow for more time for review. Under subparagraph 
(ii), the DCM would be required to provide an explanation of why the 
DCM believes the proposed rule change is non-material. Similarly, in 
Sec.  40.5(c)(1), the review period for rules that are voluntarily 
submitted by DCMs or DTEFs for approval would be extended from 30 days 
to 45 days, to be consistent with Sec.  40.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The ``enumerated commodities'' are those agricultural 
commodities listed in Sec.  1a(4) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Sec.  40.6, current Sec.  40.6(a) sets out the conditions 
under which a DCM or DCO may implement new rules by certifying them to 
the Commission. Subparagraph 40.6(a)(1) provides that the certification 
procedure does not apply to rules of a DCM that materially change a 
term or condition of a futures or option contract on an enumerated 
agricultural commodity in a delivery month with open interest. 
Subparagraphs 40.6(a)(2) and (3) set out the filing requirements for 
rule certifications and the information to be provided in such 
certifications. Section 40.6(c) establishes an exception to the rule 
certification requirements of Sec. Sec.  40.6 (a)(2) and (3) whereby 
DCMs and DCOs may place certain rules and rule amendments into effect 
without certification, provided that certain conditions are met. The 
conditions are that: (1) The DCM or DCO provide to the Commission a 
weekly summary of rule changes made effective pursuant to this 
paragraph; and (2) the rule change governs such routine matters as 
nonmaterial revisions, changes to delivery standards made by third 
parties that do not affect deliverable supplies or the pricing basis 
for the product, changes in the composition of an index (other than a 
stock index) that do not affect the pricing basis of the index, routine 
changes to option contract terms, and certain fee changes established 
by independent third parties. The proposed rules would add a reference 
to Sec.  40.6(a)(1) to the exception established in Sec.  40.6(c). The 
effect would be to make clear that, while material rule changes 
involving contract months with open interest in enumerated agricultural 
commodities may not be certified to the Commission, the type of routine 
changes described in Sec.  40.6(c)(2), as well as the partially 
overlapping list of non-material changes in Sec. Sec.  40.4(b)(1)-(8), 
would not constitute material changes within the meaning of the Act or 
Commission regulations. Therefore, DCMs could inform the Commission of 
such rule changes on a weekly basis under the provisions of Sec.  
40.6(c). Also, new Sec.  40.6(c)(2)(vi) would add to the list of items 
that could be reported weekly under Sec.  40.6(c)(1), changes in survey 
lists of banks, brokers or dealers that provide market information to 
an independent third party and that are incorporated by reference as 
product terms. Finally, new Sec.  40.6(c)(3)(ii)(F) would add de 
minimis changes to security indexes to the list of information the 
Commission does not require to be certified or reported weekly by a DCM 
or DCO.
    Under Sec.  40.7, Delegations, new Sec.  40.7(a)(3) would delegate 
to the Division the authority to notify a DCM that a rule change 
submitted for a materiality determination under Sec.  40.4(b)(9) is 
material and must be submitted for Commission approval. Finally, new 
Sec.  40.7(b)(3) would increase the Division's delegated authority to 
allow it, with the concurrence of the Office of the General Counsel, to 
approve rules regarding speculative limits or position accountability.

III. Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Section 15(a) of the Act, as amended by Section 119 of the CFMA, 
requires the Commission to consider the costs and benefits of its 
action before issuing a new regulation or order under the Act. By its 
terms, Sec.  15(a) does not require the Commission to quantify the 
costs and benefits of its action or to determine whether the benefits 
of the action outweigh its costs. Rather, Sec.  15(a) simply requires 
the Commission to ``consider the costs and benefits'' of the subject 
rule or order.
    Section 15(a) further specifies that the costs and benefits of the 
proposed rule or order shall be evaluated in light of five broad areas 
of market and public concern: (1) Protection of market participants and 
the public; (2) efficiency, competitiveness, and financial integrity of 
futures markets; (3) price discovery; (4) sound risk management 
practices; and (5) other public interest considerations. The Commission 
may, in its discretion, give greater weight to any one of the five 
enumerated areas of concern and may, in its discretion, determine that, 
notwithstanding its costs, a particular rule or order is necessary or 
appropriate to protect the public interest or to effectuate any of the 
provisions or to accomplish any of the purposes of the Act.
    The amendments proposed herein are intended to clarify and codify 
acceptable practices under the rules for trading facilities, based on 
the Commission's experience over the past four years in applying those 
rules, including the adoption of several amendments to the original 
rules over the same period. The proposed amendments also would make 
various

[[Page 39679]]

technical corrections and conforming amendments to the rules.
    In addition, the proposed amendments would revise the application 
and review process for registration as a DCO by eliminating the 
presumption of automatic fast-track review of applications and 
replacing it with the presumption that all applications will be 
reviewed pursuant to the 180-day timeframe and procedures specified in 
section 6(a) of the Act. In lieu of the current 60-day automatic fast-
track review, the Commission is proposing to permit applicants to 
request expedited review and to be registered as a DCO not later than 
90 days after the Commission receives the application.
    The Commission has endeavored, in proposing these amendments, to 
impose the minimum requirements necessary to enable the Commission to 
perform its oversight functions, to carry out its mandate of assuring 
the continued existence of competitive and efficient markets and to 
protect the public interest in markets free of fraud and abuse.
    After considering these factors, the Commission has determined to 
propose the rules and rule amendments set forth below.
    The Commission specifically invites public comment on its 
application of the criteria contained in the Act for consideration. 
Commenters are also invited to submit any quantifiable data that they 
may have concerning the costs and benefits of the proposed rules with 
their comment letter.

IV. Related Matters

A. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
requires federal agencies, in promulgating rules, to consider the 
impact of those rules on small entities. The rules proposed herein 
would affect exempt commercial markets, exempt boards of trade, 
derivatives transaction execution facilities, designated contract 
markets and designated clearing organizations. The Commission has 
previously determined that the foregoing entities are not small 
entities for purposes of the RFA.\21\ Accordingly, the Chairman, on 
behalf of the Commission, hereby certifies pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b) 
that the proposed rules will not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 47 FR 18618, 18619 (April 30, 1982) discussing contract 
markets; 66 FR 42256, 42268 (August 10, 2001) discussing exempt 
boards of trade, exempt commercial markets and derivatives 
transaction execution facilities; 66 FR 45605, 45609 (August 29, 
2001) discussing designated clearing organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This proposed rulemaking contains information collection 
requirements. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3504(h)), the Commission has submitted a copy of this section to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its review.
    Collection of Information: Rules Relating to Part 36, Establishing 
Procedures for Exempt Markets, OMB Control Number 3038-0054.
    The estimated burden was calculated as follows:
    Estimated number of respondents: 10.
    Annual responses by each respondent: 1.
    Total annual responses: 10.
    Estimated average hours per response: 1.
    Annual reporting burden: 10.
    Collection of Information: Rules Relating to Part 38, Establishing 
Procedures for Entities to become Designated as Contract Markets, OMB 
Control Number 3038-0052. The proposed rules will not change the burden 
previously approved by OMB.

    The estimated burden was calculated as follows:
    Estimated number of respondents: 13.
    Annual responses by each respondent: 1.
    Total annual responses: 13.
    Estimated average hours per response: 300.
    Annual reporting burden: 3,900.
    Collection of Information: Rules Relating to Part 39, Establishing 
Procedures for Entities to Become Registered as Derivatives Clearing 
Organizations, OMB Control Number 3038-0051. The proposed rules will 
not change the burden previously approved by OMB.

    The estimated burden was calculated as follows:
    Estimated number of respondents: 10.
    Reports annually by each respondent: 1.
    Total annual responses: 10.
    Estimated average hours per response: 200.
    Annual burden in fiscal year: 2,000.
    Organizations and individuals desiring to submit comments on the 
information collection requirements should direct them to the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503; Attention: Desk Officer for the Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission.
    The Commission considers comments by the public on this proposed 
collection of information in:
    Evaluating whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the 
Commission, including whether the information will have a practical 
use;
    Evaluating the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden 
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of 
the methodology and assumptions used;
    Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information 
to be collected; and
    Minimizing the burden of collecting information on those who are to 
respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submission of 
responses.
    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
information contained in these proposed regulations between 30 and 60 
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. 
Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect 
if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect 
the deadline for the public to comment to the Commission on the 
proposed regulations.
    Copies of the information collection submission to OMB are 
available from the CFTC Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5160.

List of Subjects

17 CFR Part 36

    Commodity futures, Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

17 CFR Part 37

    Commodity futures, Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

17 CFR Part 38

    Commodity futures, Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

17 CFR Part 39

    Commodity futures, Consumer Protection.

17 CFR Part 40

    Commodity futures, Contract markets, Designation application, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority in 
the Commodity Exchange Act and, in particular, sections 1a, 2, 3, 4, 
4c, 4i, 5,

[[Page 39680]]

5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 6 and 8a of the Act, the Commission hereby proposes to 
amend Chapter I of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as 
follows:

PART 36--EXEMPT MARKETS

    1. The authority citation for part 36 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2, 5, 6, 6c, and 12a, as amended by the 
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, Appendix E of Pub. L. 
106-554, 114 Stat. 2763 (2000).

    1a. Section 36.2 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraphs 
(b) and (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  36.2  Exempt boards of trade.

* * * * *
    (b) Notification. Boards of trade operating under Section 5d of the 
Act as exempt boards of trade shall so notify the Commission. This 
notification shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission at its 
Washington, DC headquarters, in electronic form, shall be labeled as 
``Notification of Operation as an Exempt Board of Trade,'' and shall 
include:
    (1) The name and address of the exempt board of trade; and
    (2) The name and telephone number of a contact person.
    (c) Additional requirements. (1) Prohibited representation. A board 
of trade notifying the Commission that it meets the criteria of Section 
5d of the Act and elects to operate as an exempt board of trade shall 
not represent to any person that it is registered with, designated, 
recognized, licensed or approved by the Commission.
    (2) Market data dissemination. (i) Criteria for price discovery 
determination. An exempt board of trade operating a market in reliance 
on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act performs a significant price 
discovery function for transactions in the cash market for a commodity 
underlying any agreement, contract, or transaction executed or traded 
on the facility when:
    (A) Cash market bids, offers or transactions are directly based on, 
or quoted at a differential to, the prices generated on the market on a 
more than occasional basis; or
    (B) The market's prices are routinely disseminated in a widely 
distributed industry publication and are routinely consulted by 
industry participants in pricing cash market transactions.
    (ii) Notification. An exempt board of trade operating a market in 
reliance on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act shall notify the 
Commission when:
    (A) It has reason to believe that cash market bids, offers or 
transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the 
prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis;
    (B) It has reason to believe that the market's prices are routinely 
disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are 
routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market 
transactions; or
    (C) The exempt board of trade holds out the market to the public as 
performing a price discovery function for the cash market for the 
commodity.
    (iii) Price discovery determination. Following receipt of a notice 
under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, or on its own initiative, 
the Commission may notify an exempt board of trade operating a market 
in reliance on the exemption in Section 5d of the Act that the facility 
appears to meet the criteria for performing a significant price 
discovery function under paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) or (B) of this section. 
Before making a final price discovery determination under this 
paragraph, the Commission shall provide the exempt board of trade with 
an opportunity for a hearing through the submission of written data, 
views and arguments. Any such written data, views and arguments shall 
be filed with the Secretary of the Commission in the form and manner 
and within the time specified by the Commission. After consideration of 
all relevant matters, the Commission shall issue an order containing 
its determination whether the facility performs a significant price 
discovery function under the criteria of paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) or (B) 
of this section.
    (iv) Price dissemination. (A) An exempt board of trade that the 
Commission has determined performs a significant price discovery 
function under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section shall disseminate 
publicly, and on a daily basis, all of the following information with 
respect to transactions executed in reliance on the exemption in 
Section 5d of the Act:
    (1) Contract terms and conditions, or a product description, and 
trading conventions, mechanisms and practices;
    (2) Trading volume by commodity and, if available, open interest; 
and
    (3) The opening and closing prices or price ranges, the daily high 
and low prices, a volume-weighted average price that is representative 
of trading on the board of trade, or such other daily price information 
as proposed by the board of trade and approved by the Commission.
    (B) The exempt board of trade shall make such information readily 
available to the news media and the general public without charge no 
later than the business day following the day to which the information 
pertains.
    (v) Modification of price discovery determination. An exempt board 
of trade that the Commission has determined performs a significant 
price discovery function under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section 
may petition the Commission at any time to modify or vacate that 
determination. The petition shall contain an appropriate justification 
for the request. The Commission, after notice and opportunity for a 
hearing through the submission of written data, views and arguments, 
shall by order grant, grant subject to conditions, or deny such 
request.
    (3) Annual Certification. A board of trade operating under Section 
5d of the Act as an exempt board of trade shall file with the 
Commission annually, no later than the end of each calendar year, a 
notice that includes:
    (i) A statement that it continues to operate under the exemption; 
and
    (ii) A certification that the information contained in the previous 
Notification of Operation as an Exempt Board of Trade is still correct.
    2. Section 36.3 is proposed to be amended by revising paragraph (a) 
introductory text, revising paragraph (c)(2)(ii), and adding a new 
paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:


Sec.  36.3  Exempt commercial markets.

    (a) Notification. An electronic trading facility relying upon the 
exemption in Section 2(h)(3) of the Act shall notify the Commission of 
its intention to do so. This notification, and subsequent notification 
of any material changes in the information initially provided, shall be 
filed with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC 
headquarters, in electronic form, shall be labeled as ``Notification of 
Operation as an Exempt Commercial Market,'' and shall include the 
information and certifications specified in Section 2(h)(5)(A) of the 
Act.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) Notification. An electronic trading facility operating in 
reliance on Section 2(h)(3) of the Act shall notify the Commission 
when:
    (A) It has reason to believe that cash market bids, offers or 
transactions are directly based on, or quoted at a differential to, the 
prices generated on the market on a more than occasional basis;
    (B) It has reason to believe that the market's prices are routinely 
disseminated in a widely distributed industry publication and are 
routinely consulted by industry participants in pricing cash market 
transactions; or

[[Page 39681]]

    (C) The market holds itself out to the public as performing a price 
discovery function for the cash market for the commodity.
* * * * *
    (4) Annual Certification. An electronic trading facility operating 
in reliance upon the exemption in Section 2(h)(3) of the Act shall file 
with the Commission annually, no later than the end of each calendar 
year, a notice that includes:
    (i) A statement that it continues to operate under the exemption; 
and
    (ii) A certification that the information contained in the previous 
Notification of Operation as an Exempt Commercial Market is still 
correct.

PART 37--DERIVATIVES TRANSACTION EXECUTION FACILITIES

    3. The authority citation for part 37 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2, 5, 6, 6c, 6(c), 7a and 12a, as amended by 
Appendix E of Pub. L. 106-

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.