Gulf of Mexico Program Office Funding Opportunity, 39269-39273 [05-13379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule
2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record
communications are included in the
decisional record of the proceeding,
unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40
CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
The following is a list of off-therecord communications recently
received in the Office of the Secretary.
Docket No.
1 Record
2 Record
3 Record
The communications listed are grouped
by docket numbers in ascending order.
These filings are available for review at
the Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
(FERRIS) link.
Enter the docket number, excluding
the last three digits, in the docket
number field to access the document.
For assistance, please contact FERC,
Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
Presenter or
requester
Date filed
Prohibited:
1. EC05–43–000 ..................................................................
2. ER03–563–030; EL04–102–000 .....................................
Exempt:
1. CP04–36–000; CP04–41–000 .........................................
2. CP05–83–000 ..................................................................
3. CP05–83–000 ..................................................................
4. Project No. 12053–00 ......................................................
39269
6–22–05
6–15–05
Diane Beeney.1
Frieda Denenmark.
6–16–05
6–16–05
6–22–05
6–22–05
Hon. Edward M. Lambert, Jr.
Laura Turner.2
Laura Turner.3
Jessica Jim; Brandy McDaniels; and Jolee George.
of phone call received from Ms. Beeney.
of conference call.
of phone call.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–3569 Filed 7–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7934–7]
Gulf of Mexico Program Office Funding
Opportunity
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Announcement of funding
opportunity.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: An estimated amount of
$275,000 for one to five cooperative
agreements may be awarded under this
announcement. Projects must actively
involve stakeholders and focus on the
reduction of nutrient loads to the lower
Mississippi River and its tributaries
through innovative partnerships for
developing locally led non-point source
nutrient management solutions in the
sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Watershed.
Deadline for Submissions is 5
p.m., central time, August 17, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submissions should be sent
electronically to car.gloria@epa.gov
with the proposal attached. Electronic
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
messages must use the subject line:
GMPO Request for Initial Proposal
Submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Esther Coblentz, Gulf of Mexico
Program Office, at (228) 688–1281 or
coblentz.esther@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview Information
Federal Agency Name: Environmental
Protection Agency, Gulf of Mexico
Program Office.
Funding Opportunity Title: EPA Gulf
of Mexico Program Office Request for
Initial Proposals: Innovative Producer
Partnership Initiatives to Reduce
Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
Funding Opportunity Number:
GM2005–1.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 66.475.
Dates: For further information, see
Section IV. The deadline for
submissions is 5 p.m., central time,
August 17, 2005. If you do not have the
capability to submit electronically,
please contact Esther Coblentz (228)
688–1281 or coblentz.esther@epa.gov
for information on how you may apply
under this announcement. Initial
proposals must be submitted by
electronic mail. This announcement
will be posted on the Web site at
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
https://www.epa.gov/gmpo and https://
www.fedgrants.gov and announced in
the Federal Register. All Initial
Proposals must be submitted by the
closing date and will not be accepted
after that date.
Funding Opportunity Description: An
estimated amount of $275,000 for one to
five cooperative agreements may be
awarded under this announcement for
improving the health of the Gulf of
Mexico. Projects must actively involve
stakeholders and focus on the reduction
of nutrient loads to the lower
Mississippi River and its tributaries
through innovative partnerships for
developing locally led non-point source
nutrient management solutions in the
sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Watershed.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Background
The Gulf of Mexico Program’s (GMP)
mission is to protect, restore, and
enhance the coastal and marine waters
of the Gulf and its natural habitats; to
sustain living resources; to protect
human health and the food supply; and
to ensure the long-term use of the Gulf
shores, beaches, and waters. To carry
out the GMP mission, we must continue
to develop and maintain a partnership
of State and Federal agencies, local
governments, academia, regional
business and industry, agricultural and
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
39270
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
environmental organizations, and
individual citizens and communities
that effectively addresses the complex
ecological problems that cross State,
Federal, and international jurisdictions
and boundaries.
Linkage to EPA Strategic Plan/Expected
Environmental Outcomes
The Gulf of Mexico Program Office
(GMPO) is announcing the availability
of funding and issuing this Request For
Initial Proposals addressing one or more
activities that are specifically focused
on the Mississippi River Basin and are
designed to achieve the environment
outcome of reducing nutrient loading
and ultimately the size of the Hypoxic
Zone in the Gulf of Mexico to less than
5,000 square kilometers by the year
2015.
Successful proposals must have clear
and measurable environmental results
directly related to EPA’s Strategic Plan
Goal 4 (Healthy Communities and
Ecosystems), Objective 3 (Ecosystems),
Subobjective 5 (Improve the Health of
the Gulf of Mexico).
In support of Subobjective 4.3.5, and
consistent with EPA Order 5700.7 on
environmental results, the consequences
of the awards issued pursuant to the
respective topics will be the
accomplishment of the environmental
outcome of reducing nitrogen loading
and thus the size of the hypoxic zone to
less than 5,000 square kilometers by
year 2015. Each topic area includes a
description of some of the possible
activities for that area, not all of which
would be achievable within an
assistance agreement funding period
and not all of which would necessarily
result from each project selected.
All proposals submitted will be
reviewed for eligibility under Section
104 (b)(3) of the Clean Water Act.
Assistance Agreements are authorized
under this statutory authority to
conduct and promote the coordination
and acceleration of research,
investigations, experiments, training,
demonstrations, surveys, and studies
relating to the causes, effects, extent,
prevention, reduction, and elimination
of pollution. This Federal financial
assistance program is identified in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
as CFDA 66.475, see https://
www.cfda.gov.
For this announcement, priority will
be given to proposals that actively
involve stakeholders and focus on the
environmental outcome of achieving
reduction of nutrient loads to the lower
Mississippi River and its tributaries
through innovative partnerships for
developing locally led non-point source
nutrient management solutions in the
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Watershed which will reduce the size of
the hypoxic zone. For information on
the sub-basins see https://www.epa.gov/
msbasin/index.htm#intro. These
activities are intended to help support
the implementation of the Action Plan
for Reducing, Controlling, and
Mitigating Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf
of Mexico. https://www.epa.gov/
msbasin/planintro.htm.
Specific activities to be included are
part of a strategy to achieve the
environmental outcome of reduced
nitrogen into the Gulf of Mexico thus
reducing the size of the hypoxic zone to
less than 5,000 square kilometers by
2015:
1. Conducting a workshop designed to
empower industry leaders to proactively
identify effective approaches for
addressing complex nutrient
management challenges related to
production agriculture. The workshop
will be designed and conducted to
develop a detailed plan to fulfill
commitments for nutrient reductions
using Best Management Practices
(BMPs) and other measures in the
Mississippi River Basin on a subwatershed or sub-basin basis in support
of the Hypoxia Action Plan. Output: A
detailed plan for commitment to
implement self-sustaining stakeholderled, sub-watershed nutrient reduction
strategies to achieve measurable
environmental outcomes as indicated in
the Hypoxia Action Plan; a final report
after the workshop.
2. Introducing and supporting
innovative nutrient reduction strategies
in three sub-basins in the Mississippi
River watershed. Key producer leaders
will be placed on the sub-basin
committees to integrate this effort
through on-going collaboration with the
Upper Mississippi River and Lower
Mississippi River sub-basin teams and
to help conduct specifically targeted
regional workshops to develop a multistate strategy to reduce nutrient loads to
the Gulf of Mexico. Output:
Development of nutrient reduction
strategies to achieve the environmental
outcome of reducing the size of the
hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico:
placement of producers on sub-basin
committees; and final report. Supports
Hypoxia Action Plan Item 2.
3. Securing participation of model
research farms to ensure focused
working relationships. Determine a joint
framework and agreement to support
comprehensive Best Management
Practices (BMPs) and water quality
monitoring efforts. Supports Hypoxia
Action Plan Items 3, 4 and 5.
4. Working collaboratively with EPA,
NRCS, sub-basin committees, and other
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
stakeholders in the identification and
selection of pilot microwatersheds.
Output: Report on the progress of efforts
to develop criteria for selection of
microwatersheds.
5. Maintaining and building an
innovative agriculture leadership
coalition to pilot a planned
microwatershed approach to reduce
nutrient loads in six Mississippi River
Basin microwatersheds. Output:
Develop nutrient reduction management
plans in 6 microwatersheds; increase
the innovative leadership coalition by
50 percent; annual report on the
coalition building.
6. Building a comprehensive
awareness of nutrient reduction actions
within a training plan for a uniform
approach to microwatersheds. Hypoxia
Action Plan Item 6.
7. Building a system of expert teams
tasked with science-based planning,
coordination and communication of
outcomes including benchmarking,
modeling, and interpretation of
monitoring efforts. (See Section III,
Eligibility Criteria) Hypoxia Action Plan
4, 5, and 10.
II. Award Information
Funding Amounts and Number of
Awards
Under this funding opportunity, we
expect to award an estimated $275,000
depending on availability of funds. One
to five projects will be awarded. EPA
reserves the right to make no awards
under this announcement. We will
reserve the right to offer partial funding
of a proposal by funding discrete
activities, portions, or phases of the
proposed project. If EPA decides to
partially fund the proposed project, it
will do so in a manner that does not
prejudice any applicants or affect the
basis upon which the proposed project,
or portion thereof, was evaluated and
selected, and that maintains the
integrity of the competition and the
selection/evaluation process. Additional
awards may be made if additional
funding becomes available up to 4
months after the original selection
decisions are announced. The period of
performance is from 0.5 years to two
years.
Type of Award
Successful applicants will be issued a
cooperative agreement. Cooperative
agreements require substantial EPA
involvement with the recipient in the
form of programmatic oversight and
review and comment on all agreement
activities and products. When a
cooperative agreement is awarded,
EPA’s involvement in carrying out the
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
work with the applicant will be
described in a selection letter and
identified in the terms and conditions of
the award document. In general,
cooperative agreements awarded will be
one-time awards and recipients should
use the funds within the period of
performance (from 0.5 years to two
years).
III. Eligibility Information
Eligible Applicants
State and local governments,
interstate agencies, tribes, colleges and
universities, individuals, and other
public or nonprofit organizations. An
applicant’s failure to meet eligibility
criterion by the time of any award will
preclude EPA from making an award.
EPA/GMPO will require nonprofit
organizations selected for funding to
provide verification of their nonprofit
status prior to the grant award.
Eligibility Criteria
Projects must be consistent with the
Clean Water Act Section 104(b)(3)
authority. All initial proposals
submitted will be reviewed for
eligibility under Section 104(b)(3) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA). Water Quality
Cooperative Agreements are authorized
under this statutory authority to
conduct and promote the coordination
and acceleration of research,
investigations, experiments, training,
demonstrations, surveys, and studies
relating to the causes, effects, extent,
prevention, reduction, and elimination
of pollution.
Projects that implement ‘‘Best
Management Practices’’ or any type of
construction activities must qualify as a
demonstration project under CWA
§ 104(b)(3). A demonstration project
must involve new or experimental
technologies, methods, or approaches,
where the results of the project will be
disseminated so that others can benefit
from the knowledge gained in the
demonstration project. A project that is
accomplished through the performance
of routine, traditional, or established
practices, or a project that is simply
intended to carry out a task rather than
transfer information or advance the state
of knowledge is not a demonstration.
Projects must focus on reducing
nutrient loads to the lower Mississippi
River and its tributaries and nutrient
management solutions in the sub-basins
of the Mississippi River Watershed in
order to reduce the size of the hypoxic
zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
Matching Requirements
There is no matching requirement;
however, the evaluation criteria requires
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
partnerships and leverage funding
which will be considered by reviewers
during evaluation. Nonfederal match is
strongly encouraged (at least 5%), and
may be provided in the form of cash or
in-kind services, such as staffing.
Matching funds are considered to be
cooperative agreement funds and may
be used for reasonable and necessary
expenses of carrying out the project
described in the Final Project Workplan.
Any restrictions on the use of grant
funds, including project budget periods,
also apply to the use of matching funds.
All project expenditures, including both
the federal and nonfederal share, are
subject to federal regulations governing
the use of federal funds. Other federal
money cannot be used as match unless
authorized by the statute governing the
award of the other federal funds.
Reductions to the amount of the match
after a proposal is selected for funding
may result in loss of funding.
Ineligible Activities
Applicants must adhere closely to the
types of projects authorized for funding
under CWA § 104(b)(3) in developing
initial proposals. Unauthorized project
types will be disqualified. Types of
projects that are ineligible for funding
are routine construction projects, except
to a limited degree to demonstrate
innovation, prevention, or removal of
pollution; land acquisition; or projects
that are largely general education/
outreach or conferences unless they
meet a clear need to accomplish a
public purpose and not for the direct
benefit of EPA. In accordance with
Executive Order 12579, organizations
that have been debarred or suspended
from a program by any federal agency
will not be eligible to receive an award
or subaward through this solicitation.
Threshold Eligibility Requirements
Initial Proposal packages that are
incomplete will be disqualified.
Applicants must follow Initial Proposal
Format in developing and submitting
your proposal.
Applications which do not comply
with the administrative review
requirements contained in the
Application and Submission of
Information Section (Part IV) will not be
reviewed and those submissions will be
returned to the applicant.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Content and Format of Project
Preproposals
• Follow the initial proposal format
and instructions provided below.
• Use Microsoft Word or Adobe
Acrobat for electronic submissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39271
Examples From Previous Years
When developing project
submissions, you may look at types of
successful projects from previous years,
available at https://www.epa.gov/gmpo.
Dates and Times
• Transmit electronically by 5 p.m.
Central Time, August 17, 2005.
• Initial proposals dated after this
time will be disqualified.
• Use an e-mail return receipt for
verification of receipt if you want to
confirm delivery.
Funding Restrictions: See Section III.
Eligibility Information.
Submission
Send electronic submittals to
car.gloria@epa.gov/gmpo with the
initial proposal attached.
Electronic messages must use the
subject line: ‘‘GMPO Request for Initial
Proposal Submission.’’ Messages from
unknown senders without this subject
line may be inadvertently deleted to
avoid computer viruses.
For initial proposals submitted
electronically, electronic signatures are
not required at the time of submission.
If GMPO selects the proposal for
funding, the signature of an authorized
off cial and any contributors of 3rd party
in-kind match will be required when the
full proposal is submitted. We
recommend that applicants use e-mail
return receipt that provides verification
of receipt if you wish to confirm that
GMPO has received your project
proposal.
Confidentiality
In accordance with 40 CFR 2.203,
applicants may claim all or a portion of
their application/proposal as
confidential business information. EPA
will evaluate confidentiality claims in
accordance with 40 CFR part 2.
Applicants must clearly mark
applications/proposals or portions of
applications/proposals they claim as
confidential. If no claim of
confidentiality is made, EPA is not
required to make the inquiry to the
applicant otherwise required by 40 CFR
2.204(c)(2) prior to disclosure.
Other Considerations
Projects are subject to
Intergovernmental Review under
Executive Order 12372.
Initial Proposal Format
Applicant Information
Applicant Information: Business
Mailing and Contact information,
including e-mail address. DUNS number
if Applicant Organization has one.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
39272
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
Type of Organization: State or local
government, interstate agency, tribe,
college or university, individual, or
other public or nonprofit organizations.
Applicants must submit information
relating to the programmatic capability
criteria to be evaluated under the
ranking factor(s) in section V of the
announcement. EPA will consider
information from other sources
including Agency files.
Project Summary Information
Project Title.
Brief Project Description: Summarize
the project. Do not use acronyms.
Duration: Specify project period of
performance, from 0.5 years up to 2
years.
Topic: Choose one: Identify by Tasks
in Funding Announcement.
Geographic Applicability
Applicable Mississippi River Basin:
Mississippi River Basin(s) which would
be most impacted by this project.
Applicable Geographic Location: If
applicable, geographic locations which
would be most impacted by this project,
include the Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) for the Project location. HUCs
can be found on EPA’s Surf Your
Watershed Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm.
Project Location: As applicable, enter
City, County, and State(s).
Problem, Work, Results
Problem Statement: Describe the issue
that will be addressed and its relevance
to the Gulf of Mexico, particularly to
needs and priorities in Sub-objective
4.3.5 (Improve the Health of the Gulf of
Mexico Ecosystem) of EPA’s Strategic
Plan; addressing one or more activities
that are specifically focused on the
Mississippi River Basin and are
designed to achieve the environmental
outcome of reducing nutrient loading
and ultimately the size of the Hypoxic
Zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Projects
must actively involve stakeholders and
focus on reducing nutrient loads to the
lower Mississippi River and its
tributaries through innovative
partnerships for developing locally led
non-point source nutrient management
solutions in each of the sub-basins of
the Mississippi River Watershed. (For
information on subbasins https://
www.epa.gov/msbasin/
index.htm#intro.) These activities are
intended to implement the Action Plan
for Reducing, Controlling, and
Mitigating Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf
of Mexico.
Proposed Work: Describe what will be
done and how. Many of the criteria will
be addressed here.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Environmental Results: Describe
anticipated environmental outputs and
outcomes and their linkages to the
problem statement. (See Outcomes/
Outputs described in Section 1 and
Environmental Results Order 5700.7 at:
https://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/award/
5700.7.pdf). Specify affected pollutants,
industry sectors, economic impacts,
habitats, and/or species as applicable for
the topic, and proposed progress toward
delisting, toward restoration of
beneficial use impairments, and/or
toward reducing nitrogen loading and
the size of the hypoxic zone in the Gulf
of Mexico.
Measuring Progress: Describe your
plan for tracking, measuring, and
reporting progress toward achieving
expected outputs and outcomes. Initial
Proposals must address the applicant’s
past performance in documenting the
achievement of expected outcomes/
outputs including, if applicable,
satisfactory explanations of why
outcomes/outputs were not achieved.
The applicant must describe the ability
to specify and measure the expected
environmental outcomes/outputs and
performance measures to be
accomplished as a result of the project.
See Environmental Results Order 5700.7
at https://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/
award/5700.7.pdf
Project Milestones
Milestones: Specify milestones and/or
final products and projected due dates,
including Project Start and End.
Education
Education/Outreach Component:
Identify whether project includes an
education/outreach component. If
applicable, describe the target audience
and how that group would be impacted
by the project.
Collaboration
Collaboration/Partnerships: Describe
plans and status of collaboration and
partnerships amongst the public,
private, and independent sectors.
Project Budget
Budget: Specify how the total of EPA
funds and Applicant matching funds
will be used for: Personnel/salaries,
fringe benefits, travel, equipment,
supplies, contract costs, and other costs.
Include narrative descriptions for costs
you identify as ‘‘contract’’ or ‘‘other’’.
You may include a separate line for
indirect costs if your organization has in
place (or will negotiate) an ‘‘indirect
cost rate.’’ Budget should represent the
total which would be requested from
EPA for the project’s duration. Funding
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is not assured for subsequent years for
any project.
Other Sources of Funding
Other Funding: If others are expected
to contribute funds to your Project, list
Name(s) of providers, amount provided,
and commitments made by each.
V. Application Review Information
Criteria
Projects will be evaluated based on
the Criteria specified as follows:
1. Relevance/Rationale: (20 Points)
Importance and/or relevance and
applicability of the proposed approach
to the Hypoxia Action Plan and the
level of support of long-term goals and
implementation actions.
There is intrinsic value in the
proposed work and/or relevance to the
Hypoxia Action Plan and Task Force
activities. Refers to the likelihood that
the approach proposed will make
substantial nutrient reductions or
develop strategies leading to improved
nutrient management within the basin.
2. Scientific/Professional Merit: (20
Points)
The approach is technically sound
and/or innovative; the methods,
approaches, concepts are appropriate;
there are clear goals and objectives, and
there is a plan for tracking and
measuring progress toward achieving
the expected outcomes/outputs
identified.
3. Programmatic Capability: (20 Points)
The technical capability of the
applicant to successfully carry out a
project taking into account such factors
as the applicant’s (1) past performance
in successfully completing projects
similar in size, scope, and relevance to
the proposed project, (2) history of
meeting reporting requirements on prior
or current assistance agreements and
submitting acceptable final technical
reports and applicable closeout
documentation, (3) organizational
experience and plan for timely and
successfully achieving the objectives of
the project, and (4) staff expertise/
qualifications, education, training,
facilities, administrative resources, staff
knowledge, and resources or the ability
to obtain them, to successfully achieve
the goals of the project. (Refer also to
EPA Order 5700.8 https://www.epa.gov/
ogd/grants/award/5700_8.pdf).
4. Budget: (10 Points)
The reasonableness and
appropriateness of the proposed budget
for the level of work proposed and with
the expected benefits to be achieved.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
5. Stakeholders: (20 Points)
The quality of proposed partnerships,
including the degree of broad
participation within the Mississippi
River Watershed and demonstration of
significant partnering among the
agricultural community that results in
socio-economic merits and outreach and
education. Applications will also be
evaluated on whether they provide a
partnership with a focused and effective
education and outreach strategy
regarding the long-term commitment to
the proposed objectives of the Hypoxia
Action Plan.
6. Leveraging Funding: (10 Points)
Ability of applicant to leverage other
public or private funding to complete or
complement the project.
Review and Selection Process
Evaluation and selection process will
include the following steps:
Screen for threshold eligibility.
Review and score proposals against
criteria (Reviewers/Panel).
Rank all proposals according to total
score.
Announce selections.
Contact Successful applicants and
request a detailed grant application and
final workplan.
Final Applications/Workplans
reviewed and ranked.
Approval Official determines Final
Projects.
EPA employees as well as GMP
reviewers and/or panel members who
score project proposals will be required
to sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Form and will not score any proposal in
which they have a personal, familial, or
financial interest. If an individual has a
conflict of interest with respect to any
proposal, then they cannot review any
proposal. The Director of the Gulf of
Mexico Program will make the final
selections.
Anticipated Announcement Date
GMPO will post a list of all initial
proposals selected for funding on or
about September 15, 2005. The list will
be posted at the following site: https://
www.epa.gov/gmpo. All applicants,
including those who are not selected for
funding will be notified by mail.
VI. Award Administration Information
Award Notices
EPA has 60 days to issue an award
following receipt of the complete,
fundable Application Package. Final
funding decisions are based upon the
Application Packages.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Pre-Award Review for Administrative
Capability
Non-profit applicants that are
recommended for funding will be
subject to pre-award administrative
capability reviews consistent with
paragraphs 8.b, 8.c, and 9.d of EPA
Order 5700.8 https://www.epa.gov/ogd/
grants/award/5700_8.pdf and may be
required to fill out and document an
‘‘Administrative Capability’’ form.
Administrative and Reporting
Requirements
The successful applicant will be
required to adhere to the Federal grants
requirements, particularly those found
in applicable OMB circulars on Cost
Principles (A–21, A–87, or A–122),
Administrative Requirements (A–102 or
110), and Audit Requirements (A–133)
available from https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/. This
includes government-wide requirements
pertaining to accounting standards,
lobbying, minority or woman business
enterprise, publication, meetings,
construction, and disposition of
property. EPA regulations governing
assistance programs and recipients are
codified in Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. Those
requirements, GMPO-specific
requirements currently in effect, and the
application materials that will be
needed by applicants ultimately
selected in this process can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/gmpo. The
successful Federal applicant will be
required to comply with the OMB
Circular and appropriate sections of
Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations determined applicable by
GMPO. This determination will be
embodied in the terms and conditions of
an interagency agreement.
Dispute Resolution Process
Assistance agreement competitionrelated disputes involving any
applicant, including Federal applicants,
will be resolved in accordance with the
dispute resolution procedures published
in 70 FR (Federal Register) 3629, 3630
(January 26, 2005) which can be found
at https://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/
2422/01jan20051800/
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05–
1371.htm.
Copies of these procedures may also
be requested by contacting
coblentz.esther@epa.gov.
Please note that this is not a complete
list of all regulations and policies that
govern these funds. Our Grants
Management Office Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/region4/grants/
regulations.html identifies other grant
regulations that apply.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39273
VII. Agency Contact Information
Contacts may provide appropriate
assistance to help potential applicants
determine whether the applicant itself
or the applicant’s proposed project is
eligible for funding, to assist with
administrative issues relating to
submission, and to respond to requests
for clarification of the announcement.
Applicants are solely responsible for the
content of their submissions. General
Gulf of Mexico Program Contact: Esther
Coblentz, 228–688–1281 or
coblentz.esther@epa.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Funding amounts are estimates of the
maximum amount that will be available,
based on our best available information.
These amounts are subject to change
without further notification, based on
the amount of federal funds actually
appropriated and allocated for these
programs. EPA reserves the right to
reject all proposals and make no awards.
Although an Application for Federal
Assistance (Standard Form 424 and
attachments) is not required when the
initial proposal is submitted, we
encourage you to review our grant
application package at https://
www.epa.gov/gmpo to become familiar
with the information and certifications
that will be required if your proposal is
selected for funding.
Dated: June 29, 2005.
Gloria D. Car,
Deputy Director, Gulf of Mexico Program
Office.
[FR Doc. 05–13379 Filed 7–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–7934–2]
Environmental Laboratory Advisory
Board (ELAB) Meeting Dates, and
Agenda
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of teleconference
meetings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency’s Environmental Laboratory
Advisory Board (ELAB), as previously
announced, will have teleconference
meetings on July 20, 2005 at 1 p.m. e.t.;
August 17, 2005 at 1 p.m. e.t.;
September 21, 2005 at 1 p.m. e.t.;
October 19, 2005 at 1 p.m. e.t.; and
November 16, 2005 at 1 p.m. e.t. to
discuss the ideas and views presented at
the previous ELAB meetings, as well as
new business. Items to be discussed by
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39269-39273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13379]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7934-7]
Gulf of Mexico Program Office Funding Opportunity
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA).
ACTION: Announcement of funding opportunity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: An estimated amount of $275,000 for one to five cooperative
agreements may be awarded under this announcement. Projects must
actively involve stakeholders and focus on the reduction of nutrient
loads to the lower Mississippi River and its tributaries through
innovative partnerships for developing locally led non-point source
nutrient management solutions in the sub-basins of the Mississippi
River Watershed.
DATES: Deadline for Submissions is 5 p.m., central time, August 17,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Submissions should be sent electronically to
car.gloria@epa.gov with the proposal attached. Electronic messages must
use the subject line: GMPO Request for Initial Proposal Submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Esther Coblentz, Gulf of Mexico
Program Office, at (228) 688-1281 or coblentz.esther@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview Information
Federal Agency Name: Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf of
Mexico Program Office.
Funding Opportunity Title: EPA Gulf of Mexico Program Office
Request for Initial Proposals: Innovative Producer Partnership
Initiatives to Reduce Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
Announcement Type: Initial Announcement.
Funding Opportunity Number: GM2005-1.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 66.475.
Dates: For further information, see Section IV. The deadline for
submissions is 5 p.m., central time, August 17, 2005. If you do not
have the capability to submit electronically, please contact Esther
Coblentz (228) 688-1281 or coblentz.esther@epa.gov for information on
how you may apply under this announcement. Initial proposals must be
submitted by electronic mail. This announcement will be posted on the
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/gmpo and https://www.fedgrants.gov and
announced in the Federal Register. All Initial Proposals must be
submitted by the closing date and will not be accepted after that date.
Funding Opportunity Description: An estimated amount of $275,000
for one to five cooperative agreements may be awarded under this
announcement for improving the health of the Gulf of Mexico. Projects
must actively involve stakeholders and focus on the reduction of
nutrient loads to the lower Mississippi River and its tributaries
through innovative partnerships for developing locally led non-point
source nutrient management solutions in the sub-basins of the
Mississippi River Watershed.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Background
The Gulf of Mexico Program's (GMP) mission is to protect, restore,
and enhance the coastal and marine waters of the Gulf and its natural
habitats; to sustain living resources; to protect human health and the
food supply; and to ensure the long-term use of the Gulf shores,
beaches, and waters. To carry out the GMP mission, we must continue to
develop and maintain a partnership of State and Federal agencies, local
governments, academia, regional business and industry, agricultural and
[[Page 39270]]
environmental organizations, and individual citizens and communities
that effectively addresses the complex ecological problems that cross
State, Federal, and international jurisdictions and boundaries.
Linkage to EPA Strategic Plan/Expected Environmental Outcomes
The Gulf of Mexico Program Office (GMPO) is announcing the
availability of funding and issuing this Request For Initial Proposals
addressing one or more activities that are specifically focused on the
Mississippi River Basin and are designed to achieve the environment
outcome of reducing nutrient loading and ultimately the size of the
Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico to less than 5,000 square kilometers
by the year 2015.
Successful proposals must have clear and measurable environmental
results directly related to EPA's Strategic Plan Goal 4 (Healthy
Communities and Ecosystems), Objective 3 (Ecosystems), Subobjective 5
(Improve the Health of the Gulf of Mexico).
In support of Subobjective 4.3.5, and consistent with EPA Order
5700.7 on environmental results, the consequences of the awards issued
pursuant to the respective topics will be the accomplishment of the
environmental outcome of reducing nitrogen loading and thus the size of
the hypoxic zone to less than 5,000 square kilometers by year 2015.
Each topic area includes a description of some of the possible
activities for that area, not all of which would be achievable within
an assistance agreement funding period and not all of which would
necessarily result from each project selected.
All proposals submitted will be reviewed for eligibility under
Section 104 (b)(3) of the Clean Water Act. Assistance Agreements are
authorized under this statutory authority to conduct and promote the
coordination and acceleration of research, investigations, experiments,
training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes,
effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of pollution.
This Federal financial assistance program is identified in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance as CFDA 66.475, see https://www.cfda.gov.
For this announcement, priority will be given to proposals that
actively involve stakeholders and focus on the environmental outcome of
achieving reduction of nutrient loads to the lower Mississippi River
and its tributaries through innovative partnerships for developing
locally led non-point source nutrient management solutions in the sub-
basins of the Mississippi River Watershed which will reduce the size of
the hypoxic zone. For information on the sub-basins see https://
www.epa.gov/msbasin/index.htm#intro. These activities are intended to
help support the implementation of the Action Plan for Reducing,
Controlling, and Mitigating Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico.
https://www.epa.gov/msbasin/planintro.htm.
Specific activities to be included are part of a strategy to
achieve the environmental outcome of reduced nitrogen into the Gulf of
Mexico thus reducing the size of the hypoxic zone to less than 5,000
square kilometers by 2015:
1. Conducting a workshop designed to empower industry leaders to
proactively identify effective approaches for addressing complex
nutrient management challenges related to production agriculture. The
workshop will be designed and conducted to develop a detailed plan to
fulfill commitments for nutrient reductions using Best Management
Practices (BMPs) and other measures in the Mississippi River Basin on a
sub-watershed or sub-basin basis in support of the Hypoxia Action Plan.
Output: A detailed plan for commitment to implement self-sustaining
stakeholder-led, sub-watershed nutrient reduction strategies to achieve
measurable environmental outcomes as indicated in the Hypoxia Action
Plan; a final report after the workshop.
2. Introducing and supporting innovative nutrient reduction
strategies in three sub-basins in the Mississippi River watershed. Key
producer leaders will be placed on the sub-basin committees to
integrate this effort through on-going collaboration with the Upper
Mississippi River and Lower Mississippi River sub-basin teams and to
help conduct specifically targeted regional workshops to develop a
multi-state strategy to reduce nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico.
Output: Development of nutrient reduction strategies to achieve the
environmental outcome of reducing the size of the hypoxic zone in the
Gulf of Mexico: placement of producers on sub-basin committees; and
final report. Supports Hypoxia Action Plan Item 2.
3. Securing participation of model research farms to ensure focused
working relationships. Determine a joint framework and agreement to
support comprehensive Best Management Practices (BMPs) and water
quality monitoring efforts. Supports Hypoxia Action Plan Items 3, 4 and
5.
4. Working collaboratively with EPA, NRCS, sub-basin committees,
and other stakeholders in the identification and selection of pilot
microwatersheds. Output: Report on the progress of efforts to develop
criteria for selection of microwatersheds.
5. Maintaining and building an innovative agriculture leadership
coalition to pilot a planned microwatershed approach to reduce nutrient
loads in six Mississippi River Basin microwatersheds. Output: Develop
nutrient reduction management plans in 6 microwatersheds; increase the
innovative leadership coalition by 50 percent; annual report on the
coalition building.
6. Building a comprehensive awareness of nutrient reduction actions
within a training plan for a uniform approach to microwatersheds.
Hypoxia Action Plan Item 6.
7. Building a system of expert teams tasked with science-based
planning, coordination and communication of outcomes including
benchmarking, modeling, and interpretation of monitoring efforts. (See
Section III, Eligibility Criteria) Hypoxia Action Plan 4, 5, and 10.
II. Award Information
Funding Amounts and Number of Awards
Under this funding opportunity, we expect to award an estimated
$275,000 depending on availability of funds. One to five projects will
be awarded. EPA reserves the right to make no awards under this
announcement. We will reserve the right to offer partial funding of a
proposal by funding discrete activities, portions, or phases of the
proposed project. If EPA decides to partially fund the proposed
project, it will do so in a manner that does not prejudice any
applicants or affect the basis upon which the proposed project, or
portion thereof, was evaluated and selected, and that maintains the
integrity of the competition and the selection/evaluation process.
Additional awards may be made if additional funding becomes available
up to 4 months after the original selection decisions are announced.
The period of performance is from 0.5 years to two years.
Type of Award
Successful applicants will be issued a cooperative agreement.
Cooperative agreements require substantial EPA involvement with the
recipient in the form of programmatic oversight and review and comment
on all agreement activities and products. When a cooperative agreement
is awarded, EPA's involvement in carrying out the
[[Page 39271]]
work with the applicant will be described in a selection letter and
identified in the terms and conditions of the award document. In
general, cooperative agreements awarded will be one-time awards and
recipients should use the funds within the period of performance (from
0.5 years to two years).
III. Eligibility Information
Eligible Applicants
State and local governments, interstate agencies, tribes, colleges
and universities, individuals, and other public or nonprofit
organizations. An applicant's failure to meet eligibility criterion by
the time of any award will preclude EPA from making an award. EPA/GMPO
will require nonprofit organizations selected for funding to provide
verification of their nonprofit status prior to the grant award.
Eligibility Criteria
Projects must be consistent with the Clean Water Act Section
104(b)(3) authority. All initial proposals submitted will be reviewed
for eligibility under Section 104(b)(3) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Water Quality Cooperative Agreements are authorized under this
statutory authority to conduct and promote the coordination and
acceleration of research, investigations, experiments, training,
demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes, effects,
extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of pollution.
Projects that implement ``Best Management Practices'' or any type
of construction activities must qualify as a demonstration project
under CWA Sec. 104(b)(3). A demonstration project must involve new or
experimental technologies, methods, or approaches, where the results of
the project will be disseminated so that others can benefit from the
knowledge gained in the demonstration project. A project that is
accomplished through the performance of routine, traditional, or
established practices, or a project that is simply intended to carry
out a task rather than transfer information or advance the state of
knowledge is not a demonstration.
Projects must focus on reducing nutrient loads to the lower
Mississippi River and its tributaries and nutrient management solutions
in the sub-basins of the Mississippi River Watershed in order to reduce
the size of the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
Matching Requirements
There is no matching requirement; however, the evaluation criteria
requires partnerships and leverage funding which will be considered by
reviewers during evaluation. Nonfederal match is strongly encouraged
(at least 5%), and may be provided in the form of cash or in-kind
services, such as staffing. Matching funds are considered to be
cooperative agreement funds and may be used for reasonable and
necessary expenses of carrying out the project described in the Final
Project Workplan. Any restrictions on the use of grant funds, including
project budget periods, also apply to the use of matching funds. All
project expenditures, including both the federal and nonfederal share,
are subject to federal regulations governing the use of federal funds.
Other federal money cannot be used as match unless authorized by the
statute governing the award of the other federal funds. Reductions to
the amount of the match after a proposal is selected for funding may
result in loss of funding.
Ineligible Activities
Applicants must adhere closely to the types of projects authorized
for funding under CWA Sec. 104(b)(3) in developing initial proposals.
Unauthorized project types will be disqualified. Types of projects that
are ineligible for funding are routine construction projects, except to
a limited degree to demonstrate innovation, prevention, or removal of
pollution; land acquisition; or projects that are largely general
education/outreach or conferences unless they meet a clear need to
accomplish a public purpose and not for the direct benefit of EPA. In
accordance with Executive Order 12579, organizations that have been
debarred or suspended from a program by any federal agency will not be
eligible to receive an award or subaward through this solicitation.
Threshold Eligibility Requirements
Initial Proposal packages that are incomplete will be disqualified.
Applicants must follow Initial Proposal Format in developing and
submitting your proposal.
Applications which do not comply with the administrative review
requirements contained in the Application and Submission of Information
Section (Part IV) will not be reviewed and those submissions will be
returned to the applicant.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Content and Format of Project Preproposals
Follow the initial proposal format and instructions
provided below.
Use Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat for electronic
submissions.
Examples From Previous Years
When developing project submissions, you may look at types of
successful projects from previous years, available at https://
www.epa.gov/gmpo.
Dates and Times
Transmit electronically by 5 p.m. Central Time, August 17,
2005.
Initial proposals dated after this time will be
disqualified.
Use an e-mail return receipt for verification of receipt
if you want to confirm delivery.
Funding Restrictions: See Section III. Eligibility Information.
Submission
Send electronic submittals to car.gloria@epa.gov/gmpo with the
initial proposal attached.
Electronic messages must use the subject line: ``GMPO Request for
Initial Proposal Submission.'' Messages from unknown senders without
this subject line may be inadvertently deleted to avoid computer
viruses.
For initial proposals submitted electronically, electronic
signatures are not required at the time of submission. If GMPO selects
the proposal for funding, the signature of an authorized off cial and
any contributors of 3rd party in-kind match will be required when the
full proposal is submitted. We recommend that applicants use e-mail
return receipt that provides verification of receipt if you wish to
confirm that GMPO has received your project proposal.
Confidentiality
In accordance with 40 CFR 2.203, applicants may claim all or a
portion of their application/proposal as confidential business
information. EPA will evaluate confidentiality claims in accordance
with 40 CFR part 2. Applicants must clearly mark applications/proposals
or portions of applications/proposals they claim as confidential. If no
claim of confidentiality is made, EPA is not required to make the
inquiry to the applicant otherwise required by 40 CFR 2.204(c)(2) prior
to disclosure.
Other Considerations
Projects are subject to Intergovernmental Review under Executive
Order 12372.
Initial Proposal Format
Applicant Information
Applicant Information: Business Mailing and Contact information,
including e-mail address. DUNS number if Applicant Organization has
one.
[[Page 39272]]
Type of Organization: State or local government, interstate agency,
tribe, college or university, individual, or other public or nonprofit
organizations.
Applicants must submit information relating to the programmatic
capability criteria to be evaluated under the ranking factor(s) in
section V of the announcement. EPA will consider information from other
sources including Agency files.
Project Summary Information
Project Title.
Brief Project Description: Summarize the project. Do not use
acronyms.
Duration: Specify project period of performance, from 0.5 years up
to 2 years.
Topic: Choose one: Identify by Tasks in Funding Announcement.
Geographic Applicability
Applicable Mississippi River Basin: Mississippi River Basin(s)
which would be most impacted by this project.
Applicable Geographic Location: If applicable, geographic locations
which would be most impacted by this project, include the Hydrologic
Unit Code (HUC) for the Project location. HUCs can be found on EPA's
Surf Your Watershed Web site at https://www.epa.gov/surf/locate/
index.cfm.
Project Location: As applicable, enter City, County, and State(s).
Problem, Work, Results
Problem Statement: Describe the issue that will be addressed and
its relevance to the Gulf of Mexico, particularly to needs and
priorities in Sub-objective 4.3.5 (Improve the Health of the Gulf of
Mexico Ecosystem) of EPA's Strategic Plan; addressing one or more
activities that are specifically focused on the Mississippi River Basin
and are designed to achieve the environmental outcome of reducing
nutrient loading and ultimately the size of the Hypoxic Zone in the
Gulf of Mexico. Projects must actively involve stakeholders and focus
on reducing nutrient loads to the lower Mississippi River and its
tributaries through innovative partnerships for developing locally led
non-point source nutrient management solutions in each of the sub-
basins of the Mississippi River Watershed. (For information on
subbasins https://www.epa.gov/msbasin/index.htm#intro.) These activities
are intended to implement the Action Plan for Reducing, Controlling,
and Mitigating Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico.
Proposed Work: Describe what will be done and how. Many of the
criteria will be addressed here.
Environmental Results: Describe anticipated environmental outputs
and outcomes and their linkages to the problem statement. (See
Outcomes/Outputs described in Section 1 and Environmental Results Order
5700.7 at: https://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/award/5700.7.pdf). Specify
affected pollutants, industry sectors, economic impacts, habitats, and/
or species as applicable for the topic, and proposed progress toward
delisting, toward restoration of beneficial use impairments, and/or
toward reducing nitrogen loading and the size of the hypoxic zone in
the Gulf of Mexico.
Measuring Progress: Describe your plan for tracking, measuring, and
reporting progress toward achieving expected outputs and outcomes.
Initial Proposals must address the applicant's past performance in
documenting the achievement of expected outcomes/outputs including, if
applicable, satisfactory explanations of why outcomes/outputs were not
achieved. The applicant must describe the ability to specify and
measure the expected environmental outcomes/outputs and performance
measures to be accomplished as a result of the project. See
Environmental Results Order 5700.7 at https://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/
award/5700.7.pdf
Project Milestones
Milestones: Specify milestones and/or final products and projected
due dates, including Project Start and End.
Education
Education/Outreach Component: Identify whether project includes an
education/outreach component. If applicable, describe the target
audience and how that group would be impacted by the project.
Collaboration
Collaboration/Partnerships: Describe plans and status of
collaboration and partnerships amongst the public, private, and
independent sectors.
Project Budget
Budget: Specify how the total of EPA funds and Applicant matching
funds will be used for: Personnel/salaries, fringe benefits, travel,
equipment, supplies, contract costs, and other costs. Include narrative
descriptions for costs you identify as ``contract'' or ``other''. You
may include a separate line for indirect costs if your organization has
in place (or will negotiate) an ``indirect cost rate.'' Budget should
represent the total which would be requested from EPA for the project's
duration. Funding is not assured for subsequent years for any project.
Other Sources of Funding
Other Funding: If others are expected to contribute funds to your
Project, list Name(s) of providers, amount provided, and commitments
made by each.
V. Application Review Information
Criteria
Projects will be evaluated based on the Criteria specified as
follows:
1. Relevance/Rationale: (20 Points)
Importance and/or relevance and applicability of the proposed
approach to the Hypoxia Action Plan and the level of support of long-
term goals and implementation actions.
There is intrinsic value in the proposed work and/or relevance to
the Hypoxia Action Plan and Task Force activities. Refers to the
likelihood that the approach proposed will make substantial nutrient
reductions or develop strategies leading to improved nutrient
management within the basin.
2. Scientific/Professional Merit: (20 Points)
The approach is technically sound and/or innovative; the methods,
approaches, concepts are appropriate; there are clear goals and
objectives, and there is a plan for tracking and measuring progress
toward achieving the expected outcomes/outputs identified.
3. Programmatic Capability: (20 Points)
The technical capability of the applicant to successfully carry out
a project taking into account such factors as the applicant's (1) past
performance in successfully completing projects similar in size, scope,
and relevance to the proposed project, (2) history of meeting reporting
requirements on prior or current assistance agreements and submitting
acceptable final technical reports and applicable closeout
documentation, (3) organizational experience and plan for timely and
successfully achieving the objectives of the project, and (4) staff
expertise/ qualifications, education, training, facilities,
administrative resources, staff knowledge, and resources or the ability
to obtain them, to successfully achieve the goals of the project.
(Refer also to EPA Order 5700.8 https://www.epa.gov/ogd/grants/award/
5700_8.pdf).
4. Budget: (10 Points)
The reasonableness and appropriateness of the proposed budget for
the level of work proposed and with the expected benefits to be
achieved.
[[Page 39273]]
5. Stakeholders: (20 Points)
The quality of proposed partnerships, including the degree of broad
participation within the Mississippi River Watershed and demonstration
of significant partnering among the agricultural community that results
in socio-economic merits and outreach and education. Applications will
also be evaluated on whether they provide a partnership with a focused
and effective education and outreach strategy regarding the long-term
commitment to the proposed objectives of the Hypoxia Action Plan.
6. Leveraging Funding: (10 Points)
Ability of applicant to leverage other public or private funding to
complete or complement the project.
Review and Selection Process
Evaluation and selection process will include the following steps:
Screen for threshold eligibility.
Review and score proposals against criteria (Reviewers/Panel).
Rank all proposals according to total score.
Announce selections.
Contact Successful applicants and request a detailed grant
application and final workplan.
Final Applications/Workplans reviewed and ranked.
Approval Official determines Final Projects.
EPA employees as well as GMP reviewers and/or panel members who
score project proposals will be required to sign a Conflict of Interest
Disclosure Form and will not score any proposal in which they have a
personal, familial, or financial interest. If an individual has a
conflict of interest with respect to any proposal, then they cannot
review any proposal. The Director of the Gulf of Mexico Program will
make the final selections.
Anticipated Announcement Date
GMPO will post a list of all initial proposals selected for funding
on or about September 15, 2005. The list will be posted at the
following site: https://www.epa.gov/gmpo. All applicants, including
those who are not selected for funding will be notified by mail.
VI. Award Administration Information
Award Notices
EPA has 60 days to issue an award following receipt of the
complete, fundable Application Package. Final funding decisions are
based upon the Application Packages.
Pre-Award Review for Administrative Capability
Non-profit applicants that are recommended for funding will be
subject to pre-award administrative capability reviews consistent with
paragraphs 8.b, 8.c, and 9.d of EPA Order 5700.8 https://www.epa.gov/
ogd/grants/award/5700_8.pdf and may be required to fill out and
document an ``Administrative Capability'' form.
Administrative and Reporting Requirements
The successful applicant will be required to adhere to the Federal
grants requirements, particularly those found in applicable OMB
circulars on Cost Principles (A-21, A-87, or A-122), Administrative
Requirements (A-102 or 110), and Audit Requirements (A-133) available
from https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/. This includes government-
wide requirements pertaining to accounting standards, lobbying,
minority or woman business enterprise, publication, meetings,
construction, and disposition of property. EPA regulations governing
assistance programs and recipients are codified in Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. Those requirements, GMPO-specific requirements
currently in effect, and the application materials that will be needed
by applicants ultimately selected in this process can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/gmpo. The successful Federal applicant will be
required to comply with the OMB Circular and appropriate sections of
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations determined applicable by
GMPO. This determination will be embodied in the terms and conditions
of an interagency agreement.
Dispute Resolution Process
Assistance agreement competition-related disputes involving any
applicant, including Federal applicants, will be resolved in accordance
with the dispute resolution procedures published in 70 FR (Federal
Register) 3629, 3630 (January 26, 2005) which can be found at https://
a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/
2005/05-1371.htm.
Copies of these procedures may also be requested by contacting
coblentz.esther@epa.gov.
Please note that this is not a complete list of all regulations and
policies that govern these funds. Our Grants Management Office Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/region4/grants/regulations.html identifies other
grant regulations that apply.
VII. Agency Contact Information
Contacts may provide appropriate assistance to help potential
applicants determine whether the applicant itself or the applicant's
proposed project is eligible for funding, to assist with administrative
issues relating to submission, and to respond to requests for
clarification of the announcement. Applicants are solely responsible
for the content of their submissions. General Gulf of Mexico Program
Contact: Esther Coblentz, 228-688-1281 or coblentz.esther@epa.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Funding amounts are estimates of the maximum amount that will be
available, based on our best available information. These amounts are
subject to change without further notification, based on the amount of
federal funds actually appropriated and allocated for these programs.
EPA reserves the right to reject all proposals and make no awards.
Although an Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424
and attachments) is not required when the initial proposal is
submitted, we encourage you to review our grant application package at
https://www.epa.gov/gmpo to become familiar with the information and
certifications that will be required if your proposal is selected for
funding.
Dated: June 29, 2005.
Gloria D. Car,
Deputy Director, Gulf of Mexico Program Office.
[FR Doc. 05-13379 Filed 7-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P