Establishment of Class E Surface Area, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 39175-39176 [05-13365]
Download as PDF
39175
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 129
Thursday, July 7, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
March, 14, 2005 (70 FR 12414) is
corrected as follows:
On page 12414, correct the effective
date to read September 1, 2005.
Issued in Jamaica, New York, on June 30,
2005.
Diane L. Crean,
Acting Area Staff Manager, Eastern Terminal
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–13366 Filed 7–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19458; Airspace
Docket No. 04–AEA–11]
14 CFR Part 71
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Mifflintown, PA; Correction
Establishment of Class E Surface Area,
South Lake Tahoe, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final Rule; correction.
AGENCY:
This action corrects a final
rule published in the Federal Register
on March 14, 2005 (70 FR 12414). In
that rule, the effective date was
inadvertently published as September
29, 2005. The correct effective date is
September 1, 2005. This action corrects
that error.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September
1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Francis Jordan, Airspace Specialist,
Airspace and Operations, ETSU–530,
Eastern Terminal Service Unit, Eastern
Region, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1 Aviation Plaza,
Jamaica, New York 11434–4809,
telephone: (718) 553–4521.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
14, 2005, Docket No. FAA–2004–19438;
Airspace Docket 04–AEA–11 (70 FR
12414), was published establishing
Class E airspace at Mifflintown, PA. In
that rule, the effective date was
inadvertently published as September
29, 2005. The correct effective date is
September 1, 2005. This action corrects
that error.
Correction to Final Rule
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the effective
date for Docket No. FAA–2004–19438;
Airspace docket No. 04–AEA–11, as
published in the Federal Register on
16:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
[Docket FAA 2005–21522; Airspace Docket
No. 05–AWP–06]
This action establishes a Class
E Surface Area to replace existing Class
D airspace at South Lake Tahoe, CA.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC
September 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Tonish, Air Traffic Division,
Airspace Specialist, AWP–520, WesternPacific Region, Federal Aviation
Administration, 15000 Aviation
Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261,
telephone (310) 725–6539.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
History
On January 20, 2005, the FAA
revoked Class D airspace at South Lake
Tahoe, CA due to the closure of the
Airport Traffic Control Tower. This
action will establish Class E Surface
Area airspace at South Lake Tahoe, CA
to replace the Class D airspace, and to
contain instrument procedures in
controlled airspace.
Class E Surface Area airspace is
published in Paragraph 6002 of FAA
Order 7400.9M dated August 30, 2004,
and effective September 16, 2004, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E Surface Area airspace
designation listed in this document
would be published subsequently in
this Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR, part 71
establishes Class E Surface Area at
South Lake Tahoe, CA.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
I
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; ROUTES;
AND REPORTING POINTS.
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR,
part 71 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14
CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9M,
Airspace Designation and Reporting
Points, dated August 30, 2004, and
effective September 16, 2004, is
amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
I
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace
Designated as Surface Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
AWP CA E2 South Lake Tahoe, CA
[Established]
South Lake Tahoe Airport, CA
E:\FR\FM\07JYR1.SGM
07JYR1
39176
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(Lat. 38°53′38″ N., long. 122°59′44″ W.)
Within a 4.3-mile radius of the South Lake
Tahoe Airport.
Issued in Los Angeles, California, on June
28, 2005.
Leonard Mobley,
Acting Area Director, Western Terminal
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–13365 Filed 7–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Corpus Christi–04–006]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones; Port of Port LavacaPoint Comfort, Point Comfort, TX and
Port of Corpus Christi Inner Harbor,
Corpus Christi, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing
an established security zone in the Port
of Port Lavaca-Point Comfort. Under the
Maritime Transportation Security Act of
2002, owners or operators of local
facilities are required to take specific
action to improve facility security. As
such, a security zone around local
facilities will no longer be necessary
under normal conditions. This final rule
removes an established security zone.
DATES: This rule is effective on August
8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket [COTP Corpus Christi 04–006],
and are available for inspection or
copying at Sector Corpus Christi
Prevention Department, 555 N.
Carancahua, Suite 500, Corpus Christi,
TX 78478, between 7:30 a.m. 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ensign John Oscar, Marine Safety Office
Corpus Christi, at (361) 888–3162, ext.
534.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 25, 2005, the Coast
Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rule Making and request for comments
entitled ‘‘Security Zones; Port of Port
Lavaca-Point Comfort, TX and Port of
Corpus Christi Inner Harbor, Corpus
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:00 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Christi, TX’’ in the Federal Register (70
FR 9263). As of March 28, 2005, we
have received five written comments on
that Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. No
public meeting was requested so one
was not held.
As indicated in our ‘‘Discussion of
Comments and Changes’’ section below,
we have considered these comments in
this final rule.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
As of March 28, 2005, we received
five written comments on the NPRM.
These comments focused generally on
one concern, which is the increase in
maritime security risk due to
commercial and recreational boating.
Each section of this concern is
discussed in more detail in the
following paragraphs.
Increased Maritime Security Risk. All
five comments express concern
regarding the increase in maritime
security risk that would accompany the
removal of the Port of Port Lavaca-Point
Comfort Security Zone. Each comment
states that the Port of Port Lavaca-Point
Comfort has several shipping receiving
and storage terminals for a variety of
liquid chemicals, and it also has many
foreign flagged vessels arriving and
departing the port every day. Further,
the comments state that the prohibition
of commercial and recreational vessels
in the established security zone has
provided a much-needed additional tier
of security protection for these
terminals, as well as the vessel and
cargo users. These comments state that
the removal of the established security
zone would create an increased
maritime security risk for the port and
its users.
To address these comments, the Coast
Guard’s position regarding the following
issues of waterfront facility security,
foreign flagged vessel security, and
commercial and recreational vessel
security in the Port of Port Lavaca-Point
Comfort will be explained separately.
Facility Security. Under the authority of
the Maritime Transportation Security
Act (MTSA) of 2002, the Coast Guard
published a final rule on October 22,
2003, entitled ‘‘Facility Security’’ in the
Federal Register (68 FR 60515) that
established 33 CFR part 105. That final
rule became effective November 21,
2003, and provides security measures
for certain facilities, including those
facilities that exist on waterways in the
Port of Port Lavaca-Point Comfort area.
Section 105.200 of 33 CFR requires
owners or operators of these facilities to
designate security officers for facilities,
develop security plans based on security
assessments and surveys, implement
security measures specific to the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
facility’s operations, and comply with
Maritime Security Levels. Under 33 CFR
105.115, the owners or operators of
these facilities must have submitted to
the Captain of the Port, by December 31,
2003, a Facility Security Plan as
described in Subpart D of 33 CFR 105,
or if intending to operate under an
approved Alternative Security Program
as described in 33 CFR 101.130, a letter
signed by the facility owner or operator
stating which approved Alternative
Security Program the owner or operator
intends to use. Section 105.115 of 33
CFR part 105 also requires facility
owners or operators to be in compliance
with 33 CFR part 105 on or before July
1, 2004.
Only a small number of waterfront
facilities exist within the area protected
by the security zone. Each of these
facilities submitted a comprehensive
facility security plan (FSP), which has
been thoroughly reviewed and approved
by the Coast Guard. Additionally, each
facility was examined for compliance
with their FSP within the last twelve
months. All facilities were found to be
in full compliance with their FSP.
Additionally, facilities subject to the
MTSA must have the capability to
continuously monitor, among other
things, the facility and its approaches on
land and water, and vessels at the
facility and areas surrounding the
vessels.
Vessel Security. Each foreign flagged
vessel greater than 300 gross tons that
intends to enter the Port of Port LavacaPoint Comfort must submit a notice of
arrival to the Coast Guard through the
National Vessel Movement Center in
accordance with 33 CFR part 160. As
part of this notification process, detailed
information regarding the times of
arrival and departure, on board cargo,
crew, last five ports visited and other
pertinent information must be supplied
in advance of the vessel’s arrival. MSO
Corpus Christi processes this arrival
information, and using standard Coast
Guard criteria, determines if a vessel
merits special consideration before
being allowed entry into the United
States. Such vessels are characterized as
high interest vessels (HIV). Those HIVs
are boarded offshore to verify the
integrity of the vessel’s security in order
to ensure the protection of both the
vessel and the port. In all cases, no
vessel is allowed entry into any port
unless all security concerns have been
adequately addressed.
The Coast Guard calculated that for
the past 5 years the average number of
vessels arriving each year was 330.
Between April 1, 2004, and March 31,
2005, a total of 364 vessel arrivals
occurred. Of that, only 20 vessels, or 5.5
E:\FR\FM\07JYR1.SGM
07JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39175-39176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13365]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket FAA 2005-21522; Airspace Docket No. 05-AWP-06]
Establishment of Class E Surface Area, South Lake Tahoe, CA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action establishes a Class E Surface Area to replace
existing Class D airspace at South Lake Tahoe, CA.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC September 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Tonish, Air Traffic Division,
Airspace Specialist, AWP-520, Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation
Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261,
telephone (310) 725-6539.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On January 20, 2005, the FAA revoked Class D airspace at South Lake
Tahoe, CA due to the closure of the Airport Traffic Control Tower. This
action will establish Class E Surface Area airspace at South Lake
Tahoe, CA to replace the Class D airspace, and to contain instrument
procedures in controlled airspace.
Class E Surface Area airspace is published in Paragraph 6002 of FAA
Order 7400.9M dated August 30, 2004, and effective September 16, 2004,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E Surface
Area airspace designation listed in this document would be published
subsequently in this Order.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR, part 71 establishes Class E Surface Area
at South Lake Tahoe, CA.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS.
0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR, part 71 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9M, Airspace Designation and
Reporting Points, dated August 30, 2004, and effective September 16,
2004, is amended as follows:
* * * * *
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.
* * * * *
AWP CA E2 South Lake Tahoe, CA [Established]
South Lake Tahoe Airport, CA
[[Page 39176]]
(Lat. 38[deg]53'38'' N., long. 122[deg]59'44'' W.)
Within a 4.3-mile radius of the South Lake Tahoe Airport.
Issued in Los Angeles, California, on June 28, 2005.
Leonard Mobley,
Acting Area Director, Western Terminal Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-13365 Filed 7-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M