Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Transportation Conformity, 38776-38779 [05-13279]
Download as PDF
38776
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action to approve
clarifications to the applicability and
compliance methods for particulate
matter standards for fuel-burning
equipment may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In Section 52.1070, the table in
paragraph (c) is amended by revising the
entries for COMAR 26.11.09.01,
26.11.09.03 and 26.11.09.06 to read as
follows:
I
Dated: June 15, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
§ 52.1070
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * [EPA approved regulations.]
EPA–APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland administrative regulations (COMAR)
State effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval date
Additional explanation/citation at 40 CFR 52.1100
*
COMAR 26.11.09.01
26.11.09.01 ...............
*
*
*
*
*
*
Control of Fuel-burning Equipment, Stationary Internal Combustion Engines, and Certain Fuel-Burning
Installations
Definitions ..............
6/21/04 7/6/05 .................... Revised Definition of ‘‘fuel’’ in 26.11.09.01.B.2–1.a.
[Insert page number where the
document begins].
*
26.11.09.03 ...............
*
General Conditions
for Fuel-Burning
Equipment.
*
26.11.09.06 ...............
*
Control of Particulate Matter.
*
*
*
6/21/04
*
6/21/04
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06–OAR–2005–TX–0024; FRL–7928–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas;
Transportation Conformity
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action approving State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Texas on February 23, 2004, and
16:43 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
7/6/05 ....................
[Insert page number where the
document
beings].
*
*
Revised paragraphs 26.11.09.03.C.1 and 2.
*
7/6/05 ....................
[Insert page number where the
document begins].
*
*
Addition of paragraph 26.11.09.06C.
*
[FR Doc. 05–13281 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate jul<14>2003
*
*
*
on May 17, 2005. These revisions serve
to incorporate recent revisions to the
federal conformity rule into the state
conformity SIP.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 6, 2005, without further
notice, unless EPA receives relevant
adverse comment by August 5, 2005. If
EPA receives such comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Materials in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R06–OAR–2005–
TX–0024, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rempub/. Regional
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
Materials in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ Web
site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’
(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs at
diggs.thomas@epa.gov. Please also send
a copy by email to the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section below.
• Fax: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax
number 214–665–7263.
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
• Mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
• Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr.
Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Such deliveries are accepted only
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
weekdays except for legal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R06–OAR–2005–TX–0024.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
file without change and may be made
available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information
through Regional Materials in EDocket
(RME), regulations.gov or e-mail if you
believe that it is CBI or otherwise
protected from disclosure. The EPA
RME Web site and the federal
regulations.gov Web site are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public file and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of
encryption, and should be free of any
defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Materials in EDocket (RME)
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rempub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:43 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in the official file, which is available at
the Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review
Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253 to make an appointment.
If possible, please make the
appointment at least two working days
in advance of your visit. There will be
a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available
for public inspection at the State Air
Agency listed below during official
business hours by appointment:
Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, Office of Air Quality, 12124
Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Wade, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–7247; fax number
214–665–7263; e-mail address
wade.peggy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Outline
I. What Action is EPA Taking?
II. What is the Background for this Action?
III. What Did the State Submit and How Did
We Evaluate It?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
On May 22, 2003, the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ) submitted revisions to its SIP
addressing changes to the transportation
conformity rule (30 TAC 114.260)
adopted by the state on May 1, 2003.
Additionally, on May 17, 2005, EPA
received another submittal from TCEQ
further revising the transportation
conformity rule as adopted by the state
on April 27, 2005. These revisions
incorporate recent changes in the
federal transportation conformity rule
into the Texas conformity SIP and are
described in detail below. EPA is
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38777
approving these revisions to the Texas
conformity SIP.
II. What Is the Background for This
Action?
The Federal Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 (CAA) required
each state to submit a revision to its SIP
by November 25, 1994, establishing
enforceable criteria and procedures for
making conformity determinations for
metropolitan transportation plans
(MTP), transportation improvement
programs (TIP), and projects funded by
the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) or the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA). The conformity
rule assures that in air quality
nonattainment or maintenance areas,
projected emissions from transportation
plans and programs stay within the
motor vehicle emissions ceiling in the
applicable attainment demonstration or
maintenance SIP. The transportation
conformity SIP enables the state to
implement and enforce the Federal
transportation conformity requirements
at the state level per 40 CFR 51 subpart
T and 40 CFR 93 subpart A.
EPA published final rules regarding
conformity requirements on November
24, 1993 (58 FR 62188). Since then, EPA
has made several amendments to the
transportation conformity rules: August
7, 1995 (60 FR 40098), November 14,
1995 (60 FR 57179), August 15, 1997 (62
FR 43780), April 10, 2000 (65 FR
18911), August 6, 2002 (67 FR 50808),
and July 1, 2004 (69 FR 40004). The
state of Texas submitted an initial
conformity SIP to EPA on November 6,
1994, and we approved this SIP on
November 8, 1995 (60 FR 56244).
Revisions to this SIP to address the
federal rule amendments promulgated
up to and including 1997 were
submitted by the Governor of Texas on
December 10, 1998, and approved by
EPA on July 8, 1999 (64 FR 36790). With
the current revisions submitted by
TCEQ, the state is aligning its rule to the
federal conformity rule for all
amendments up to and including those
promulgated on July 1, 2004.
Specifically, these revisions address a
March 2, 1999, ruling by the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia (Environmental Defense
Fund v. EPA, et al., 167 F. 3d 641, D.C.
Cir. 1999). The court’s ruling affected
provisions of the rule that pertained to
the funding of MTPs and TIPs; use of
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEB) prior to SIP approval; federal
transportation projects in areas without
a conforming MTP and TIP; timing of
conformity consequences following an
EPA SIP disapproval; and use of
submitted safety margins in areas with
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
38778
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
approved SIPs submitted prior to
November 24, 1993.
More recent changes to the rule are
inclusion of criteria and procedures for
implementing conformity in accordance
with the new National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) addressing
eight-hour ozone and particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter less than
or equal to 2.5 micrometers (PM 2.5).
Changes relating to the implementation
of these new standards are summarized
below.
Changes to 40 CFR 93.101 add new
definitions for one-hour ozone NAAQS;
eight-hour ozone NAAQS; donut areas;
isolated rural nonattainment and
maintenance areas; and limited
maintenance plans. Other federal
changes in the rule include provision of
a one-year grace period before
conformity is required in newly
designated nonattainment areas and the
addition of PM 2.5 to the list of criteria
pollutants (40 CFR 93.102). Changes to
40 CFR 93.104 were made to amend the
point by which a conformity
determination must be made following
a state’s submission of a control strategy
SIP or maintenance SIP for the first
time. This new provision requires
conformity to be determined within 18
months of EPA’s affirmative finding that
the SIP’s MVEBs are adequate. Changes
to the grace period for transportation
plan requirements in certain ozone and
carbon monoxide nonattainment areas
are made in 40 CFR 93.106. 40 CFR
93.109 has been changed to include the
applicability of conformity for one-hour
ozone nonattainment or maintenance
areas until EPA revokes the one-hour
ozone NAAQS and additional language
related to conformity requirements for
the new NAAQS for eight-hour ozone
and PM 2.5. Changes to 40 CFR 93.110
clarify that conformity determinations
must be based on the latest planning
assumptions in place at the time a
conformity analysis begins, rather than
at the time of Department of
Transportation’s conformity finding.
Some changes to the methodology of
hot-spot analyses were made at 40 CFR
93.116. The rule revisions also made
several changes with respect to the
MVEB at 40 CFR 93.118 where the
adequacy process is discussed. Changes
to 40 CFR 93.119 concern use of interim
emissions tests in areas without
adequate or approved MVEBs. In 40
CFR 93.120, the 120-day grace period
previously allowed prior to a conformity
freeze has been deleted so that a freeze
will occur immediately upon the
effective date of a SIP disapproval. EPA
amended the rule at 40 CFR 93.121 so
that regionally significant, non-federal
projects may no longer advance during
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:43 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
a conformity lapse unless they have
received all necessary state and local
approvals prior to the lapse. EPA also
made minor revisions to 40 CFR 93.117
and 40 CFR 93.124–93.126. For a
comprehensive guide to all changes in
the federal rule, please see the reference
document at https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
transp/conform/420b04013.pdf or the
transportation conformity final rule at
69 FR 40004.
III. What Did the State Submit and How
Did We Evaluate It?
With these two SIP submissions, the
state is incorporating by reference the
changes made to the federal conformity
rule up to and including the final rule
issued on July 1, 2004 (69 FR 40004),
with the exception of the requirements
of 40 CFR 93.105. The federal
requirements in 40 CFR 93.105 are
addressed in the commission’s rule in
30 TAC 114.260(d) and are not being
changed with this revision. The TCEQ is
also making minor changes to other
sections of the state conformity rule to
correct typographical errors and reflect
updated name and style changes within
the Commission in accordance with the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting
Manual of October 2002.
The SIP revision package submitted to
EPA on May 22, 2003, contained a
revision to 30 TAC 114.452, Control
Requirements. EPA is not acting on 30
TAC 114.452 today. This submitted
revision allows commercial operators of
lawn and garden equipment additional
time to submit an alternate emission
reduction plan. However, TCEQ has
since repealed this rule and EPA will be
acting on the repeal in a subsequent
Federal Register publication. The
package submitted in 2003 also
contained a revision to 30 TAC 114.21,
Exemptions. EPA is not acting on 30
TAC 114.21 today.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the
Texas conformity SIP and
corresponding amendments to 30 TAC
114.260 Transportation Conformity. The
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because we view this as
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revisions if relevant adverse
comments are received. The rule will be
effective on September 6, 2005, without
further notice unless we receive adverse
comment by August 5, 2005. If we
receive adverse comment we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Register informing the public
this rule will not take effect. We will
address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. We will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of
adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this regulatory
action from Executive Order 12866,
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’ This rule is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is
not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
38779
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act.
This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). EPA interprets
Executive Order 13045 as applying only
to those regulatory actions that are
based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5–
501 of the Order has the potential to
influence the regulation. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it approves a state program.
In reviewing SIP submissions under
the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note), EPA’s role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the
criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this
context, in the absence of a prior
existing requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a
SIP submission for failure to use VCS.
It would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a SIP submission, to use VCS in place
of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air
Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
do not apply. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 6,
2005. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 17, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
I
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. In § 52.2270, the table in paragraph
(c) entitled ‘‘EPA approved regulations
in the Texas SIP’’ under Chapter 114 is
amended by revising section 114.260 to
read as follows:
I
§ 52.2270
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP
State citation
*
*
EPA approval
date
*
*
*
Chapter 114 (Reg 4) Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles
*
*
Section 114.260 ......................................
*
State approval/submittal date
Title/subject
*
*
Transportation Conformity ......................
*
*
*
*
04/27/2005
*
7/6/2005
[Insert FR
page number
where
document
begins]
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–13279 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:43 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
*
06JYR1
Explanation
*
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38776-38779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13279]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06-OAR-2005-TX-0024; FRL-7928-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas;
Transportation Conformity
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Texas on
February 23, 2004, and on May 17, 2005. These revisions serve to
incorporate recent revisions to the federal conformity rule into the
state conformity SIP.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 6, 2005, without further
notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by August 5, 2005.
If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Materials in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-TX-0024, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://docket.epa.gov/rempub/. Regional
Materials in EDocket (RME), EPA's electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: https://epa.gov/
region6/r6coment.htm. Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select
``Air'' before submitting comments.
E-mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs at diggs.thomas@epa.gov. Please
also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Fax: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), at fax number 214-665-7263.
[[Page 38777]]
Mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are
accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays except
for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R06-OAR-2005-TX-
0024. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public file without change and may be made available online at
https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
through Regional Materials in EDocket (RME), regulations.gov or e-mail
if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure.
The EPA RME Web site and the federal regulations.gov Web site are
``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public file and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters and any form of encryption, and should be
free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
Regional Materials in EDocket (RME) index at https://docket.epa.gov/
rempub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or in the official file, which
is available at the Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733. The file will be made available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 8:30
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or
Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253 to make an appointment. If possible,
please make the appointment at least two working days in advance of
your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies
of documents. On the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The State submittal is also available for public inspection at the
State Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office of Air Quality,
12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Wade, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7247; fax number
214-665-7263; e-mail address wade.peggy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Outline
I. What Action is EPA Taking?
II. What is the Background for this Action?
III. What Did the State Submit and How Did We Evaluate It?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
On May 22, 2003, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ) submitted revisions to its SIP addressing changes to the
transportation conformity rule (30 TAC 114.260) adopted by the state on
May 1, 2003. Additionally, on May 17, 2005, EPA received another
submittal from TCEQ further revising the transportation conformity rule
as adopted by the state on April 27, 2005. These revisions incorporate
recent changes in the federal transportation conformity rule into the
Texas conformity SIP and are described in detail below. EPA is
approving these revisions to the Texas conformity SIP.
II. What Is the Background for This Action?
The Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA) required each
state to submit a revision to its SIP by November 25, 1994,
establishing enforceable criteria and procedures for making conformity
determinations for metropolitan transportation plans (MTP),
transportation improvement programs (TIP), and projects funded by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA). The conformity rule assures that in air quality
nonattainment or maintenance areas, projected emissions from
transportation plans and programs stay within the motor vehicle
emissions ceiling in the applicable attainment demonstration or
maintenance SIP. The transportation conformity SIP enables the state to
implement and enforce the Federal transportation conformity
requirements at the state level per 40 CFR 51 subpart T and 40 CFR 93
subpart A.
EPA published final rules regarding conformity requirements on
November 24, 1993 (58 FR 62188). Since then, EPA has made several
amendments to the transportation conformity rules: August 7, 1995 (60
FR 40098), November 14, 1995 (60 FR 57179), August 15, 1997 (62 FR
43780), April 10, 2000 (65 FR 18911), August 6, 2002 (67 FR 50808), and
July 1, 2004 (69 FR 40004). The state of Texas submitted an initial
conformity SIP to EPA on November 6, 1994, and we approved this SIP on
November 8, 1995 (60 FR 56244). Revisions to this SIP to address the
federal rule amendments promulgated up to and including 1997 were
submitted by the Governor of Texas on December 10, 1998, and approved
by EPA on July 8, 1999 (64 FR 36790). With the current revisions
submitted by TCEQ, the state is aligning its rule to the federal
conformity rule for all amendments up to and including those
promulgated on July 1, 2004.
Specifically, these revisions address a March 2, 1999, ruling by
the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
(Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA, et al., 167 F. 3d 641, D.C. Cir.
1999). The court's ruling affected provisions of the rule that
pertained to the funding of MTPs and TIPs; use of motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEB) prior to SIP approval; federal transportation
projects in areas without a conforming MTP and TIP; timing of
conformity consequences following an EPA SIP disapproval; and use of
submitted safety margins in areas with
[[Page 38778]]
approved SIPs submitted prior to November 24, 1993.
More recent changes to the rule are inclusion of criteria and
procedures for implementing conformity in accordance with the new
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) addressing eight-hour
ozone and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or
equal to 2.5 micrometers (PM 2.5). Changes relating to the
implementation of these new standards are summarized below.
Changes to 40 CFR 93.101 add new definitions for one-hour ozone
NAAQS; eight-hour ozone NAAQS; donut areas; isolated rural
nonattainment and maintenance areas; and limited maintenance plans.
Other federal changes in the rule include provision of a one-year grace
period before conformity is required in newly designated nonattainment
areas and the addition of PM 2.5 to the list of criteria
pollutants (40 CFR 93.102). Changes to 40 CFR 93.104 were made to amend
the point by which a conformity determination must be made following a
state's submission of a control strategy SIP or maintenance SIP for the
first time. This new provision requires conformity to be determined
within 18 months of EPA's affirmative finding that the SIP's MVEBs are
adequate. Changes to the grace period for transportation plan
requirements in certain ozone and carbon monoxide nonattainment areas
are made in 40 CFR 93.106. 40 CFR 93.109 has been changed to include
the applicability of conformity for one-hour ozone nonattainment or
maintenance areas until EPA revokes the one-hour ozone NAAQS and
additional language related to conformity requirements for the new
NAAQS for eight-hour ozone and PM 2.5. Changes to 40 CFR
93.110 clarify that conformity determinations must be based on the
latest planning assumptions in place at the time a conformity analysis
begins, rather than at the time of Department of Transportation's
conformity finding. Some changes to the methodology of hot-spot
analyses were made at 40 CFR 93.116. The rule revisions also made
several changes with respect to the MVEB at 40 CFR 93.118 where the
adequacy process is discussed. Changes to 40 CFR 93.119 concern use of
interim emissions tests in areas without adequate or approved MVEBs. In
40 CFR 93.120, the 120-day grace period previously allowed prior to a
conformity freeze has been deleted so that a freeze will occur
immediately upon the effective date of a SIP disapproval. EPA amended
the rule at 40 CFR 93.121 so that regionally significant, non-federal
projects may no longer advance during a conformity lapse unless they
have received all necessary state and local approvals prior to the
lapse. EPA also made minor revisions to 40 CFR 93.117 and 40 CFR
93.124-93.126. For a comprehensive guide to all changes in the federal
rule, please see the reference document at https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
transp/conform/420b04013.pdf or the transportation conformity final
rule at 69 FR 40004.
III. What Did the State Submit and How Did We Evaluate It?
With these two SIP submissions, the state is incorporating by
reference the changes made to the federal conformity rule up to and
including the final rule issued on July 1, 2004 (69 FR 40004), with the
exception of the requirements of 40 CFR 93.105. The federal
requirements in 40 CFR 93.105 are addressed in the commission's rule in
30 TAC 114.260(d) and are not being changed with this revision. The
TCEQ is also making minor changes to other sections of the state
conformity rule to correct typographical errors and reflect updated
name and style changes within the Commission in accordance with the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual of October 2002.
The SIP revision package submitted to EPA on May 22, 2003,
contained a revision to 30 TAC 114.452, Control Requirements. EPA is
not acting on 30 TAC 114.452 today. This submitted revision allows
commercial operators of lawn and garden equipment additional time to
submit an alternate emission reduction plan. However, TCEQ has since
repealed this rule and EPA will be acting on the repeal in a subsequent
Federal Register publication. The package submitted in 2003 also
contained a revision to 30 TAC 114.21, Exemptions. EPA is not acting on
30 TAC 114.21 today.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the Texas conformity SIP and
corresponding amendments to 30 TAC 114.260 Transportation Conformity.
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revisions if relevant adverse
comments are received. The rule will be effective on September 6, 2005,
without further notice unless we receive adverse comment by August 5,
2005. If we receive adverse comment we will publish a timely withdrawal
in the Federal Register informing the public this rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.'' This rule is not a ``significant energy action''
as defined in Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. This
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely
[[Page 38779]]
approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as
applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it approves a state
program.
In reviewing SIP submissions under the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note), EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the
Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use
VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that
otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 6, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 17, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. In Sec. 52.2270, the table in paragraph (c) entitled ``EPA approved
regulations in the Texas SIP'' under Chapter 114 is amended by revising
section 114.260 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval/ EPA approval
State citation Title/subject submittal date date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Chapter 114 (Reg 4) Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles
* * * * * * *
Section 114.260.............. Transportation 04/27/2005 7/6/2005
Conformity. [Insert FR
page number
where document
begins]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 05-13279 Filed 7-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P