Dimethyl Ether; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance; Technical Correction, 38785-38786 [05-13173]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
rule is not a ‘‘major rule ’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
Dated: June 27, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR Chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
Follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the Federal Register
document of May 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathryn Boyle, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–6304; e-mail address:
boyle.kathryn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
PART 180 —[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.950 table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding alphabetically
the following entries to read as follows:
I
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
The Agency included in the final rule
a list of those who may be potentially
affected by this action. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
*
*
*
*
*
In addition to using EDOCKET at
(e)* * *
https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, you may
access this Federal Register document
Chemical Name
CAS No.
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
*
*
*
*
*
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
Alpha - cyclodextrin .................. 10016–20–3 frequently updated electronic version of
*
*
*
*
*
40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
Beta - cyclodextrin ....................
7585–39–9 www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
§ 180.950 Tolerance exemptions for
minimal risk active and inert ingredients.
*
*
*
*
*
Gamma - cyclodextrin ..............
*
*
*
*
17465–86–0
*
[FR Doc. 05–13263 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2005–0109; FRL–7721–1]
Dimethyl Ether; Exemption from the
Requirement of a Tolerance; Technical
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the
Federal Register of May 18, 2005,
establishing a tolerance exemption for
dimethyl ether (methane, oxybis-). This
document is being issued to correct the
CAS Reg. No. for dimethyl ether.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
6, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:43 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
II. What Does this Correction Do?
A tolerance exemption for dimethyl
ether (methane, oxybis-) was established
in the Federal Register of May 18, 2005,
(70 FR 28436), (FRL–7711–4). In that
document the CAS Reg. No. in the
tolerance exemption expression was
given as 115–10–06. It should be 115–
10–6 as expressed in the preamble.
III. Why is this Correction Issued as a
Final Rule?
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an
Agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a final
rule without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. EPA
has determined that there is good cause
for making today’s technical correction
final without prior proposal and
opportunity for comment, because EPA
is merely correcting a typographical
error in a previously-published final
rule in the Chemical Abstracts Service
(CAS) numerical designation for a
chemical. Notice and public procedures
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38785
are unnecessary for such a minor
change. The initial notice for the final
rule and the final rule clearly identified
the chemical by name. EPA finds that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
IV. Do Any of the Statutory and
Executive Order Reviews Apply to this
Action?
This final rule implements a technical
correction to the CFR., and it does not
otherwise impose or amend any
requirements. As such, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
determined that a technical correction is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
subject to review by OMB under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). Nor does this
final rule contain any information
collection requirements subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4).
Since the Agency has made a ‘‘good
cause’’ finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the APA or any
other statute (see Unit III.), this action
is not subject to provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This action will not result in
environmental justice related issues and
does not, therefore, require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since this action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined by
Executive Order 12866; it does not
require OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), and
is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
38786
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
This technical correction will not
have a substantial direct effect on States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132,
entitledFederalism(64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ This
technical correction does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. For
these same reasons, this technical
correction does not have any ‘‘tribal
implications’’ as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by tribal officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that
have tribal implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule ’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
I
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 23, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is corrected
as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.910, by amending the entry
in the table under ‘‘Dimethyl ether’’, by
correcting the CAS Reg. No. 115–10–06
to read as follows:
I
§ 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and
post-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement a tolerance.
*
*
*
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dimethyl ether (methane, oxybis-) (CAS Reg. No. 115–10–6) ................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
...........................................................
[FR Doc. 05–13173 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2005–0192; FRL–7723–2]
Fenpropathrin; Re-Establishment of
Tolerance for Emergency Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
16:43 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
This regulation is effective July
6, 2005. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 6, 2005.
DATES:
SUMMARY: This regulation re-establishes
a time-limitedtolerance for residues of
the insecticide fenpropathrin in or on
currants at 15 parts per million (ppm)
for an additional 3–year period. This
tolerance will expire and is revoked on
June 30, 2008. This action is in response
VerDate jul<14>2003
to EPA’s granting of an emergency
exemption under section 18 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing
use ofthe pesticide on currants. Section
408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requires EPA to
establish a time-limited tolerance or
exemption from the requirement for a
tolerance for pesticide chemical
residues in food that will result from the
use of a pesticide under an emergency
exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA
section 18.
To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit III. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Uses
Propellant
docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2005–
0192. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at http:/
/www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed
in the index, some information is not
publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will
bepublicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legalholidays.
The docket telephone number is (703)
305–5805.
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38785-38786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13173]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2005-0109; FRL-7721-1]
Dimethyl Ether; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance;
Technical Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of May 18,
2005, establishing a tolerance exemption for dimethyl ether (methane,
oxybis-). This document is being issued to correct the CAS Reg. No. for
dimethyl ether.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July 6, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES
in the Federal Register document of May 18, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Boyle, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 305-6304; e-mail address: boyle.kathryn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
The Agency included in the final rule a list of those who may be
potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, you
may access this Federal Register document electronically through the
EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40
CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. What Does this Correction Do?
A tolerance exemption for dimethyl ether (methane, oxybis-) was
established in the Federal Register of May 18, 2005, (70 FR 28436),
(FRL-7711-4). In that document the CAS Reg. No. in the tolerance
exemption expression was given as 115-10-06. It should be 115-10-6 as
expressed in the preamble.
III. Why is this Correction Issued as a Final Rule?
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an Agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making today's technical
correction final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment,
because EPA is merely correcting a typographical error in a previously-
published final rule in the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numerical
designation for a chemical. Notice and public procedures are
unnecessary for such a minor change. The initial notice for the final
rule and the final rule clearly identified the chemical by name. EPA
finds that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
IV. Do Any of the Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Apply to this
Action?
This final rule implements a technical correction to the CFR., and
it does not otherwise impose or amend any requirements. As such, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that a technical
correction is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review
by OMB under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Nor does this final rule contain
any information collection requirements subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4).
Since the Agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the APA or any
other statute (see Unit III.), this action is not subject to provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This action will not result in environmental justice related issues
and does not, therefore, require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined by Executive Order 12866; it does not require OMB review or any
Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), and is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
[[Page 38786]]
This technical correction will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitledFederalism(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies
that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive order
to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' This technical correction does not
alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities
established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section
408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. For these same reasons, this technical
correction does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in
Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that
have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not
have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule '' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 23, 2005.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is corrected as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.910, by amending the entry in the table under
``Dimethyl ether'', by correcting the CAS Reg. No. 115-10-06 to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and post-harvest; exemptions
from the requirement a tolerance.
* * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Dimethyl ether (methane, oxybis- .................. Propellant
) (CAS Reg. No. 115-10-6).
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 05-13173 Filed 7-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S