North Dakota Regulatory Program, 38639-38642 [05-13124]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
three years, provided and maintained
administrative office space for a CBP
office. Roanoke Regional Airport and
Virginia Tech/Montgomery Executive
Airport have also provided adequate
facilities for regular CBP operations,
including passenger and cargo
inspection areas, and storage areas as
necessary.
CBP believes that the New River
Valley community is committed to
making optimal use of electronic data
transfer capability to permit integration
with the CBP Automated Commercial
System for processing entries. The New
River Valley User Fee Airport has, for
over three years, provided and
maintained electronic data equipment
software necessary to conduct regular
CBP business. CBP has been informed
that the airport is committed to upgrade
equipment as necessary and, in fact, is
currently in the process of installing a
frame relay computer system, at no
expense to the Federal Government, in
order that adequate integration may be
maintained with the Department of
Homeland Security and the CBP
systems.
Conditional Status
Based on the information above and
the level and pace of development in
New River Valley and the surrounding
area, CBP believes that there is
sufficient justification for the
establishment of New River Valley,
Virginia, as a port of entry on a
conditional basis. If, after reviewing the
public comments, CBP decides to create
a port of entry at New River Valley and
terminate New River Valley Airport’s
designation as a user-fee airport, then
CBP will notify the airport of that
determination in accordance with the
provisions of 19 CFR 122.15(c).
However, it is noted that this proposal
relies on potential (within
approximately 3 years), rather than
actual, workload figures. Therefore,
even if the proposed port of entry
designation is adopted as a final rule,
CBP will, in 3 years, review the actual
workload generated within the new port
of entry. If that review indicates that the
actual workload is below the T.D. 82–
37 (as amended) standards, procedures
may be instituted to revoke the port of
entry status. In such case, the airport
may reapply to become a user-fee
airport under the provisions of 19 U.S.C.
58b.
Description of Proposed Port of Entry
Limits
The geographical limits of the
proposed New River Valley port of entry
would be as follows: The continuous
outer boundaries of the Montgomery,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:08 Jul 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
Pulaski and Roanoke counties in the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
Proposed Amendments to Regulations
If the proposed port of entry
designation is adopted, the list of CBP
ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) will
be amended to add New River Valley as
a port of entry in Virginia, and New
River Valley Airport will be deleted
from the list of user-fee airports at 19
CFR 122.15(b).
Comments
Before adopting this proposal as a
final rule, consideration will be given to
any written comments timely submitted
to CBP, including comments on the
clarity of this proposed rule and how it
may be made easier to understand.
Comments submitted will be available
for public inspection in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act (5
U.S.C. 552) and 19 CFR 103.11(b), on
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the
Regulations Branch, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Customs and
Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 572–
8768.
Authority
This change is proposed under the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and 19 U.S.C.
2, 66, and 1624.
Executive Order 12866 and the
Regulatory Flexibility Act
With DHS approval, CBP establishes,
expands and consolidates CBP ports of
entry throughout the United States to
accommodate the volume of CBP-related
activity in various parts of the country.
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this regulatory
proposal is not a significant regulatory
action as defined under Executive Order
12866. This proposed rule also will not
have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, it is certified that this
document is not subject to the
additional requirements of the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Signing Authority
The signing authority for this
document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a)
because the establishment of a new port
of entry and the termination of the userfee status of an airport are not within
the bounds of those regulations for
which the Secretary of the Treasury has
retained sole authority. Accordingly, the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38639
notice of proposed rulemaking may be
signed by the Secretary of Homeland
Security (or his or her delegate).
Drafting Information
The principal author of this document
was Steven Bratcher, Regulations
Branch, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, CBP. However, personnel from
other offices participated in its
development.
Dated: April 29, 2005.
Robert C. Bonner,
Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection.
Dated: June 23, 2005.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–13120 Filed 7–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 934
[SATS No. ND–048, North Dakota
Amendment No. XXXV]
North Dakota Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the North
Dakota regulatory program (hereinafter,
the ‘‘North Dakota program’’) under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). North Dakota proposes revisions to
rules which reduce notice requirements
associated with bond release
applications. North Dakota intends to
revise its program to improve
operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and
locations that the North Dakota program
and proposed amendment to that
program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that we will follow for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., m.d.t. August 4, 2005. If requested,
we will hold a public hearing on the
amendment on August 1, 2005. We will
accept requests to speak until 4 p.m.,
m.d.t. on July 20, 2005.
E:\FR\FM\05JYP1.SGM
05JYP1
38640
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘SATS No. ND–048, North
Dakota Amendment XXXV’’, by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: fatencio@osmre.gov.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Frank Atencio, Acting Director,
Casper Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
Federal Building, 100 East B Street,
Room 1018, Casper, WY 82601–1018,
(307) 261–6550.
• Fax: (307) 261–6552.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
SATS No. ND–048–FOR. For
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the North Dakota
program, this amendment, a listing of
any scheduled public hearings, and all
written comments received in response
to this document you must go to the
addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting the Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement’s (OSM)
Casper Field Office. In addition, you
may review a copy of the amendment
during regular business hours at the
following locations:
Casper Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, Federal Building, 100
East B Street, Room 1018, Casper, WY
82601–1018, (307) 261–6550,
fatencio@osmre.gov.
James R. Deutsch, Director, Reclamation
Division, Public Service Commission,
600 E. Boulevard Ave. Dept. 408,
Bismarck, North Dakota 58505–0480,
(701) 328–2400.
ndpsc@state.us.nd.us.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Atencio, Telephone: (307) 261–
6550. Internet: fatencio@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the North Dakota Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the North Dakota
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:08 Jul 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the North
Dakota program on December 15, 1980.
You can find background information
on the North Dakota program, including
the Secretary’s findings, the disposition
of comments, and conditions of
approval of the North Dakota program in
the December 15, 1980, Federal Register
(45 FR 82214). You can also find later
actions concerning North Dakota’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 934.10, 934.12, 934.15, 934.16, and
934.30.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated April 20, 2005, North
Dakota sent us a proposed amendment
to its program ([Amendment number
XXXV], administrative record No. ND–
JJ–01) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et
seq.). North Dakota sent the amendment
to include the changes made at its own
initiative. The full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES.
Specifically, North Dakota proposes to
make two changes to reduce some of the
notice requirements associated with
bond release applications.
The first change deletes the
requirement that the permittee publish
newspaper notices in daily newspapers
of general circulation in the mine’s
locality. However, the permittee is still
required to publish bond release
notices, once a week for four
consecutive weeks, in the official
county newspaper where the bond
release tract is located.
The second change deletes language
that requires the permittee to send bond
release notices to subsurface owners of
tracts proposed for bond release. Mining
companies will still be required to send
bond release notices to the surface
owners of the bond release tracts and
the adjoining property owners.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the North Dakota program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your comments should be
specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We will not consider
or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
received after the close of the comment
period (see Dates). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
administrative record, but comments
delivered to an address other than the
Casper Field Office may not be logged
in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as
an ASCII file avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption.
Please also include ‘‘Attn: SATS No.
ND–048–FOR’’ and your name and
return address in your Internet message.
If you do not receive a confirmation that
we have received your Internet message,
contact the Casper Field Office at (307)
261–6555.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
normal business hours. We will not
consider anonymous comments. If
individual respondents request
confidentiality, we will honor their
request to the extent allowable by law.
Individual respondents who wish to
withhold their name or address from
public review, except for the city or
town, must state this prominently at the
beginning of their comments. We will
make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public review in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., m.d.t. on July 20, 2005. If you are
disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
E:\FR\FM\05JYP1.SGM
05JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:08 Jul 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
38641
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian Tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes.
The rule does not involve or affect
Indian Tribes in any way.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2) of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
E:\FR\FM\05JYP1.SGM
05JYP1
38642
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 5, 2005 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 934
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: June 1, 2005.
Allen D. Klein,
Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 05–13124 Filed 7–1–05; 8:45 am]
can also call EPA’s toll-free WIPP
Information Line, 1–800–331–WIPP or
visit our Web site at https://www.epa/
gov/radiation/wipp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 194
[FRL–7931–5]
Waste Characterization Program
Documents Applicable to Transuranic
Radioactive Waste From the Hanford
Site for Disposal at the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of availability; opening
of public comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of, and soliciting public
comments for 30 days on, Department of
Energy (DOE) documents applicable to
characterization of transuranic (TRU)
radioactive waste at the Hanford site
proposed for disposal at the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The
documents are available for review in
the public dockets listed in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. EPA’s
inspection of waste characterization
systems and processes at Hanford is
conducted to verify that the site can
characterize transuranic waste in
accordance with EPA’s WIPP
compliance criteria. EPA performed this
inspection the week of June 20, 2005.
DATES: EPA is requesting public
comment on the documents. Comments
must be received by EPA’s official Air
Docket on or before August 4, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by mail to: EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), Air and Radiation
Docket, Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA West, Mail Code 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Attention
Docket ID No. OAR–2005–0143.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically, by facsimile, or through
hand delivery/courier. Follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit I.B of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rajani D. Joglekar, Office of Radiation
and Indoor Air, (202) 343–9462. You
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:08 Jul 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
A. How Can I Get Copies of This
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under Docket ID No. OAR–2005–0143.
The official public docket consists of the
documents specifically referenced in
this action, any public comments
received, and other information related
to this action. Although a part of the
official docket, the public docket does
not include Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
The official public docket is the
collection of materials that is available
for public viewing at the Air and
Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the Air
and Radiation Docket is (202) 566–1742.
These documents are also available for
review in paper form at the official EPA
Air Docket in Washington, DC, Docket
No. A–98–49, Category II–A2, and at the
following three EPA WIPP informational
docket locations in New Mexico: in
Carlsbad at the Municipal Library,
Hours: Monday–Thursday, 10 a.m.–9
p.m., Friday–Saturday, 10 a.m.–6 p.m.,
and Sunday, 1 p.m.–5 p.m.; in
Albuquerque at the Government
Publications Department, Zimmerman
Library, University of New Mexico,
Hours: vary by semester; and in Santa
Fe at the New Mexico State Library,
Hours: Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–5 p.m.
As provided in EPA’s regulations at 40
CFR part 2, and in accordance with
normal EPA docket procedures, if
copies of any docket materials are
requested, a reasonable fee may be
charged for photocopying.
2. Electronic Access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the Federal Register listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to submit or view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents
of the official public docket, and to
access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically.
Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’
then key in the appropriate docket
identification number.
Certain types of information will not
be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not
included in the official public docket,
will not be available for public viewing
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
policy is that copyrighted material will
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
available docket materials will be made
available in EPA’s electronic public
docket. When a document is selected
from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B. EPA
intends to work towards providing
electronic access to all of the publicly
available docket materials through
EPA’s electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is
important to note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing in EPA’s electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide
a reference to that material in the
version of the comment that is placed in
EPA’s electronic public docket. The
entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available
in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on
computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be
transferred to EPA’s electronic public
docket. Public comments that are
mailed or delivered to the Docket will
be scanned and placed in EPA’s
electronic public docket. Where
practical, physical objects will be
photographed, and the photograph will
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket along with a brief description
written by the docket staff.
E:\FR\FM\05JYP1.SGM
05JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 5, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38639-38642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13124]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 934
[SATS No. ND-048, North Dakota Amendment No. XXXV]
North Dakota Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the North
Dakota regulatory program (hereinafter, the ``North Dakota program'')
under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or
the Act). North Dakota proposes revisions to rules which reduce notice
requirements associated with bond release applications. North Dakota
intends to revise its program to improve operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and locations that the North Dakota
program and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
m.d.t. August 4, 2005. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on
the amendment on August 1, 2005. We will accept requests to speak until
4 p.m., m.d.t. on July 20, 2005.
[[Page 38640]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``SATS No. ND-048,
North Dakota Amendment XXXV'', by any of the following methods:
E-mail: fatencio@osmre.gov.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Frank Atencio, Acting Director, Casper Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Federal Building, 100 East
B Street, Room 1018, Casper, WY 82601-1018, (307) 261-6550.
Fax: (307) 261-6552.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and SATS No. ND-048-FOR. For instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Comment Procedures'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the North
Dakota program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public
hearings, and all written comments received in response to this
document you must go to the addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may
receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting the Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement's (OSM) Casper Field Office.
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following locations:
Casper Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, Federal Building, 100 East B Street, Room 1018, Casper, WY
82601-1018, (307) 261-6550, fatencio@osmre.gov.
James R. Deutsch, Director, Reclamation Division, Public Service
Commission, 600 E. Boulevard Ave. Dept. 408, Bismarck, North Dakota
58505-0480, (701) 328-2400. ndpsc@state.us.nd.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Atencio, Telephone: (307) 261-
6550. Internet: fatencio@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the North Dakota Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the North Dakota Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the North Dakota program on December 15, 1980.
You can find background information on the North Dakota program,
including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and
conditions of approval of the North Dakota program in the December 15,
1980, Federal Register (45 FR 82214). You can also find later actions
concerning North Dakota's program and program amendments at 30 CFR
934.10, 934.12, 934.15, 934.16, and 934.30.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated April 20, 2005, North Dakota sent us a proposed
amendment to its program ([Amendment number XXXV], administrative
record No. ND-JJ-01) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). North Dakota
sent the amendment to include the changes made at its own initiative.
The full text of the program amendment is available for you to read at
the locations listed above under ADDRESSES.
Specifically, North Dakota proposes to make two changes to reduce
some of the notice requirements associated with bond release
applications.
The first change deletes the requirement that the permittee publish
newspaper notices in daily newspapers of general circulation in the
mine's locality. However, the permittee is still required to publish
bond release notices, once a week for four consecutive weeks, in the
official county newspaper where the bond release tract is located.
The second change deletes language that requires the permittee to
send bond release notices to subsurface owners of tracts proposed for
bond release. Mining companies will still be required to send bond
release notices to the surface owners of the bond release tracts and
the adjoining property owners.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the North Dakota program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your comments should be specific, pertain only to the
issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support
of your recommendations. We will not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final rule if they are received after the
close of the comment period (see Dates). We will make every attempt to
log all comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered
to an address other than the Casper Field Office may not be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII file avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also include
``Attn: SATS No. ND-048-FOR'' and your name and return address in your
Internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation that we have
received your Internet message, contact the Casper Field Office at
(307) 261-6555.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review during normal business hours.
We will not consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents
request confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent
allowable by law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their
name or address from public review, except for the city or town, must
state this prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public review in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., m.d.t. on July
20, 2005. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to attend
a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
[[Page 38641]]
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian Tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian Tribes.
The rule does not involve or affect Indian Tribes in any way.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
[[Page 38642]]
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 934
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: June 1, 2005.
Allen D. Klein,
Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 05-13124 Filed 7-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P