Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; State Implementation Plan Correction, 38028-38029 [05-13061]
Download as PDF
38028
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by August 30, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration
by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule
for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
I
Dated: June 21, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
§ 52.1220
I
Subpart Y—Minnesota
2. In § 52.1220, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Flint Hills Resources, L.P.’’ to read as
follows:
*
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA.—APPROVED MINNESOTA SOURCE-SPECIFIC PERMITS
Name of source
Permit No.
*
*
Flint Hills Resources, L.P. (formerly
Koch Petroleum).
State effective
date
*
........................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–13060 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[SIP NO. CO–001–0072; FRL–7931–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Colorado; State Implementation Plan
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
When EPA approved
Colorado’s Carbon Monoxide
Redesignation to Attainment and
Related Revisions for Fort Collins on
July 22, 2003, we inadvertently
submitted extraneous pages from
Regulation No. 13, ‘‘Oxygenated Fuels
Program’’ for incorporation by reference
into the State Implementation Plan
(SIP). EPA is correcting these errors
with this document. This action is being
taken under section 110(k)(6) of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on August
1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kerri Fiedler, EPA, Region 8, (303) 312–
6493, fiedler.kerri@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used it means the EPA.
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:59 Jun 30, 2005
*
06/14/04
Jkt 205001
EPA approval date
Comments
*
06/05/03, 68 FR 33631
*
*
Amendment Seven to Findings and
Order.
*
*
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedures are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting erroneous text in previous
rulemakings. Thus notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
I. Correction to Federal Register
Document Published on July 22, 2003
(68 FR 43316)
On July 22, 2003 (68 FR 43316), we
approved the Fort Collins Carbon
Monoxide Redesignation to Attainment
and Related Revisions submitted by the
Governor of Colorado on August 9,
2002. In this action, we also approved
revisions to Regulation No. 13,
‘‘Oxygenated Fuels Program.’’ We
inadvertently submitted a sentence and
a paragraph from Regulation No. 13 for
incorporation by reference into the SIP.
Therefore, we are correcting this error
by resubmitting the incorporation by
reference material in 40 CFR
52.320(c)(99)(i)(B) to the Air and
Radiation Docket and Information
Center and the Office of the Federal
Register. We also inadvertently included
the sentence and paragraph in the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
regulatory text at 40 CFR
52.320(c)(99)(i)(B). We are correcting the
regulatory text to indicate that the
sentence and paragraph are not in the
SIP. Regulation No. 13 includes a
sentence and a paragraph that are State
only regulations, and should not be
included in the SIP. Therefore, the last
sentence in Section II.C.1.c.v. of
Regulation No. 13: ‘‘This Section
II.C.1.c.v. is repealed effective February
1, 2019 and is replaced by the
requirements in Section II.C.1.c.vi.
below beginning November 1, 2019.,’’
and Section II.C.1.c.vi. of Regulation No.
13: ‘‘Effective November 1, 2019, the
minimum oxygen content by weight
shall be at least 2.7% from November 1
through the end of the Oxygenated
Gasoline Control Period as defined in
Section II.B. The average oxygen content
by weight shall be at least 3.1% from
November 1 through February 7. This
Section II.C.1.c.vi. shall be a state only
regulation, and shall not be included in
the State Implementation Plan.’’ are
being removed from the SIP.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. This
rule is not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
12866. Because the agency has made a
‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action is
not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute as
indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4, 109 Stat. 48 (1995)). In addition,
this action does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments or
impose a significant intergovernmental
mandate, as described in sections 203
and 204 of UMRA. This rule also does
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the Executive
Order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). EPA’s compliance
with these statutes and Executive
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:28 Jun 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
Orders for the underlying rules are
discussed in the July 22, 2003 rule
approving Colorado’s Carbon Monoxide
Redesignation Request and Related
Revisions for Fort Collins.
The Congressional Review Act (CRA)
(5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA has
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of August
1, 2005. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. These corrections
to the identification of plan for Utah is
not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
38029
Section II.C.1.c.v., ‘‘This Section
II.C.1.c.v. is repealed effective February
1, 2019 and is replaced by the
requirements in Section II.C.1.c.vi.
below beginning November 1, 2019.,’’
and Section II.C.1.c.vi., as adopted on
July 18, 2002, effective September 30,
2002, which supersedes and replaces all
prior versions of Regulation No. 13.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–13061 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[Docket #: R10–OAR–2004–WA–0003; FRL–
7927–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Spokane PM10 Nonattainment Area
Limited Maintenance Plan and
Redesignation Request
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the Limited
Maintenance Plan for the Spokane
nonattainment area (NAA) in
Washington and grant the request by the
State to redesignate the area from
nonattainment to attainment for PM10.
On November 30, 2004, the State of
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Washington submitted a Limited
Environmental protection, Air
Maintenance Plan (LMP) for the
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Spokane nonattainment area (NAA) for
Incorporation by reference,
approval and concurrently requested
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
that EPA redesignate the Spokane NAA
and recordkeeping requirements.
to attainment for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
Dated: June 17, 2005.
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
Kerrigan G. Clough,
diameter less than or equal to a nominal
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
10 micrometers (PM10). In 1997, EPA
I 40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
approved Washington’s moderate area
plan for the Spokane NAA for all PM10
PART 52—[CORRECTED]
sources except windblown dust. In this
I 1. The authority citation for part 52
direct final action, EPA is also
continues to read as follows:
approving the remaining elements of the
Spokane NAA moderate area plan for
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
windblown dust sources.
Subpart G—Colorado
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective August 30, 2005, without
I 2. Section 52.320 is amended by
further notice, unless EPA receives
revising paragraph (c)(99)(i)(B) to read as adverse comments by August 1, 2005. If
follows:
adverse comments are received, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
§ 52.320 Identification of plan.
direct final rule in the Federal Register
*
*
*
*
*
informing the public that the rule will
(c) * * *
not take effect.
(99) * * *
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
(i) * * *
(B) Regulation No. 13 ‘‘Oxygenated
identified by Docket ID No. R10–OAR–
Fuels Program’’, 5 CCR 1001–16, except 2004–WA–0003, by one of the following
for section III, the last sentence in
methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38028-38029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13061]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[SIP NO. CO-001-0072; FRL-7931-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Colorado; State Implementation Plan Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: When EPA approved Colorado's Carbon Monoxide Redesignation to
Attainment and Related Revisions for Fort Collins on July 22, 2003, we
inadvertently submitted extraneous pages from Regulation No. 13,
``Oxygenated Fuels Program'' for incorporation by reference into the
State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA is correcting these errors with
this document. This action is being taken under section 110(k)(6) of
the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerri Fiedler, EPA, Region 8, (303)
312-6493, fiedler.kerri@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we'' or
``our'' is used it means the EPA.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
erroneous text in previous rulemakings. Thus notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
I. Correction to Federal Register Document Published on July 22, 2003
(68 FR 43316)
On July 22, 2003 (68 FR 43316), we approved the Fort Collins Carbon
Monoxide Redesignation to Attainment and Related Revisions submitted by
the Governor of Colorado on August 9, 2002. In this action, we also
approved revisions to Regulation No. 13, ``Oxygenated Fuels Program.''
We inadvertently submitted a sentence and a paragraph from Regulation
No. 13 for incorporation by reference into the SIP. Therefore, we are
correcting this error by resubmitting the incorporation by reference
material in 40 CFR 52.320(c)(99)(i)(B) to the Air and Radiation Docket
and Information Center and the Office of the Federal Register. We also
inadvertently included the sentence and paragraph in the regulatory
text at 40 CFR 52.320(c)(99)(i)(B). We are correcting the regulatory
text to indicate that the sentence and paragraph are not in the SIP.
Regulation No. 13 includes a sentence and a paragraph that are State
only regulations, and should not be included in the SIP. Therefore, the
last sentence in Section II.C.1.c.v. of Regulation No. 13: ``This
Section II.C.1.c.v. is repealed effective February 1, 2019 and is
replaced by the requirements in Section II.C.1.c.vi. below beginning
November 1, 2019.,'' and Section II.C.1.c.vi. of Regulation No. 13:
``Effective November 1, 2019, the minimum oxygen content by weight
shall be at least 2.7% from November 1 through the end of the
Oxygenated Gasoline Control Period as defined in Section II.B. The
average oxygen content by weight shall be at least 3.1% from November 1
through February 7. This Section II.C.1.c.vi. shall be a state only
regulation, and shall not be included in the State Implementation
Plan.'' are being removed from the SIP.
II. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order
[[Page 38029]]
12866. Because the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this
action is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute as indicated in the
Supplementary Information section above, it is not subject to the
regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (1995)). In
addition, this action does not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule also
is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the Executive Order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). EPA's compliance with these statutes and
Executive Orders for the underlying rules are discussed in the July 22,
2003 rule approving Colorado's Carbon Monoxide Redesignation Request
and Related Revisions for Fort Collins.
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA has made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of August 1,
2005. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. These corrections to the
identification of plan for Utah is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 17, 2005.
Kerrigan G. Clough,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
0
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[CORRECTED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G--Colorado
0
2. Section 52.320 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(99)(i)(B) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(99) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Regulation No. 13 ``Oxygenated Fuels Program'', 5 CCR 1001-16,
except for section III, the last sentence in Section II.C.1.c.v.,
``This Section II.C.1.c.v. is repealed effective February 1, 2019 and
is replaced by the requirements in Section II.C.1.c.vi. below beginning
November 1, 2019.,'' and Section II.C.1.c.vi., as adopted on July 18,
2002, effective September 30, 2002, which supersedes and replaces all
prior versions of Regulation No. 13.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-13061 Filed 6-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P