Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota, 38025-38028 [05-13060]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 30, 2005. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: June 16, 2005. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: I PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(311)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(328)(i)(B)(2) to read as follows: I §52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (311) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (2) Previously approved on June 3, 2003 in paragraph (c)(311)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted without replacement, Subsection (c)(1) (July 1, 2005 VOC limits) of Rule 1171. * * * * * (328) * * * (i) * * * (B) * * * (2) Previously approved on July 27, 2004 in paragraph (c)(328)(i)(B)(1) of VerDate jul<14>2003 16:59 Jun 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 this section and now deleted without replacement, Subsection (c)(1) (July 1, 2005 VOC limits) of Rule 1171. * * * * * [FR Doc. 05–13052 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [R05–OAR–2005–MN–0002; FRL–7931–2] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to the sulfur dioxide (SO2) requirements for Flint Hills Resources, L.P. (Flint Hills) of Dakota County, Minnesota. Flint Hills operates a Rosemont, Minnesota petroleum refinery. The requested revisions will allow the refinery to produce ultra low sulfur diesel fuel. This expansion will add five sources and create an increase in sulfur dioxide emissions. An analysis of the additional sources was conducted. The results show that the air quality of Dakota County will remain in compliance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide. DATES: This rule is effective on August 30, 2005 unless EPA receives adverse written comments by August 1, 2005. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005– MN–0002 by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Agency Web Site: https:// docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s electronic public docket and comments system, is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. Fax: (312) 886–5824. Mail: You may send written comments to: John Mooney, Chief, PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 38025 Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Hand Delivery: Deliver your comments to: John Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–MN–0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web site are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the related proposed rule which is published in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the RME index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in RME or E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM 01JYR1 38026 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886–6524 before visiting the Region 5 office. This Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone: (312) 886–6524, EMail: rau.matthew@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information? C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? II. What is EPA Approving? III. What are the Changes From the Current Rule? IV. What is EPA’s Analysis of the Supporting Materials? V. What are the Environmental Effects of These Actions? VI. What Rulemaking Action is EPA Taking? VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? This action applies to a single source, Flint Hills Resources, L.P., whose facility is located in Dakota County, Minnesota. B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information? 1. The Regional Office has established an electronic public rulemaking file available for inspection at RME under ID No. R05–OAR–2005–MN–0002, and a hard copy file which is available for inspection at the Regional Office. The official public file consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public rulemaking file does not include CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public rulemaking file is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division, EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, VerDate jul<14>2003 16:59 Jun 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 Illinois 60604. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. 2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the regulations.gov Web site located at https://www.regulations.gov where you can find, review, and submit comments on Federal rules that have been published in the Federal Register, the Government’s legal newspaper, and are open for comment. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing at the EPA Regional Office, as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in the official public rulemaking file. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available at the Regional Office for public inspection. C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate rulemaking identification number by including the text ‘‘Public comment on proposed rulemaking Region 5 Air Docket R05–OAR–2005–MN–0002’’ in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to consider these late comments. For detailed instructions on submitting public comments and on what to consider as you prepare your comments see the ADDRESSES section and the section I General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the related proposed rule which is published in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register. PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 II. What is EPA Approving? EPA is approving revisions to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide SIP for the Flint Hills refinery. Flint Hills is installing equipment to begin producing ultra low sulfur diesel fuel. It is adding a Hydrocracker Charge Heater (unit 29H–1), a Hydrocracker Fractionator Heater (29H–2), a charge heater for the #4 Hydrogen Plant (30H–1), an emergency diesel generator (EE–29– 401), and an emergency diesel powered cooling water pump (81P 450) to its refinery. III. What are the Changes From the Current Rule? The new sources at the refinery are for the production of ultra low sulfur diesel fuel. Operation of the five additional sources could increase the SO2 emissions by 125.7 tons per year (TPY). IV. What is EPA’s Analysis of the Supporting Materials? Flint Hills conducted air dispersion modeling to assess the effect of its proposed new equipment and operating plan on ambient air quality. The modelers used the ISCST3 dispersion model in the regulatory default mode, with five years of meteorological data from the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The SO2 emissions from other nearby companies were included. When the modeling was performed, Flint Hills had not finalized the locations of the new boilers and heaters. It modeled the new sources concurrently at three potential locations, with each source at its full emission rate. The modeled results are more conservative because of this multiple counting. Flint Hills’ proposed revisions include an option of reducing the firing duty of some existing heaters and boilers. To conservatively account for this possibility, the modeling included those boilers and heaters at their current SO2 emission rates, but at reduced stack exit velocities representative of their new usage scenario. This rulemaking action concerns only the new sources for producing ultra-low sulfur diesel. The modeling also includes the impacts from portable diesel equipment. The sulfur dioxide emissions from these sources were combined and modeled as from an representative average engine located near the facility fence line, where previous modeling analyses had shown high ambient impacts to occur. This also should produce a conservative result. The final results of the Flint Hills modeling, including background SO2 concentrations, were below the 3-hour, 24-hour, and annual SO2 NAAQS. The E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM 01JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations maximum predicted SO2 concentrations, the modeled plus background concentrations, are 242 µg/ m3 compared to the 365 µg/m3 24-hour standard and 45 µg/m3 compared to the 80 µg/m3 annual standard. The maximum predicted 3-hour SO2 concentration of 688 µg/m3 is below the secondary standard of 1300 µg/m3. V. What are the Environmental Effects of These Actions? Sulfur dioxide causes breathing difficulties and aggravation of existing cardiovascular disease. It is also a precursor of acid rain and fine particulate matter formation. Sulfate particles are a major cause of visibility impairment in America. Acid rain damages lakes and streams impairing aquatic life and causes damage to buildings, sculptures, statues, and monuments. Sulfur dioxide also causes the loss of chloroform leading to vegetation damage. The addition of the new sources causes this revision to result in a higher sulfur dioxide emissions. The effects of the increased emissions were analyzed. Analysis showed that the maximum predicted SO2 concentrations are below the primary and secondary air quality standards. This indicates that public health and welfare in Dakota County, Minnesota should be protected. VI. What Rulemaking Action is EPA Taking? EPA is approving, through direct final rulemaking, revisions to sulfur dioxide emissions regulations for Flint Hills Resources, L.P. of Dakota County, Minnesota. We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse written comments are filed. This rule will be effective August 30, 2005 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written comments by August 1, 2005. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If we do not receive any VerDate jul<14>2003 16:59 Jun 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 comments, this action will be effective August 30, 2005. VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Executive Order 12866; Regulatory Planning and Review Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use Because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy action,’’ this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). Regulatory Flexibility Act This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13132 Federalism This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 38027 on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. Executive Order 13045 Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM 01JYR1 38028 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 30, 2005. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. I Dated: June 21, 2005. Norman Niedergang, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. § 52.1220 I Subpart Y—Minnesota 2. In § 52.1220, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by revising the entry for ‘‘Flint Hills Resources, L.P.’’ to read as follows: * 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: Identification of plan. * * (d) * * * * * EPA.—APPROVED MINNESOTA SOURCE-SPECIFIC PERMITS Name of source Permit No. * * Flint Hills Resources, L.P. (formerly Koch Petroleum). State effective date * ........................ * * * * * * * * [FR Doc. 05–13060 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [SIP NO. CO–001–0072; FRL–7931–7] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; State Implementation Plan Correction Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule; technical correction. AGENCY: When EPA approved Colorado’s Carbon Monoxide Redesignation to Attainment and Related Revisions for Fort Collins on July 22, 2003, we inadvertently submitted extraneous pages from Regulation No. 13, ‘‘Oxygenated Fuels Program’’ for incorporation by reference into the State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA is correcting these errors with this document. This action is being taken under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This rule is effective on August 1, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerri Fiedler, EPA, Region 8, (303) 312– 6493, fiedler.kerri@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used it means the EPA. SUMMARY: VerDate jul<14>2003 16:59 Jun 30, 2005 * 06/14/04 Jkt 205001 EPA approval date Comments * 06/05/03, 68 FR 33631 * * Amendment Seven to Findings and Order. * * Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that there is good cause for making today’s rule final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting erroneous text in previous rulemakings. Thus notice and public procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). I. Correction to Federal Register Document Published on July 22, 2003 (68 FR 43316) On July 22, 2003 (68 FR 43316), we approved the Fort Collins Carbon Monoxide Redesignation to Attainment and Related Revisions submitted by the Governor of Colorado on August 9, 2002. In this action, we also approved revisions to Regulation No. 13, ‘‘Oxygenated Fuels Program.’’ We inadvertently submitted a sentence and a paragraph from Regulation No. 13 for incorporation by reference into the SIP. Therefore, we are correcting this error by resubmitting the incorporation by reference material in 40 CFR 52.320(c)(99)(i)(B) to the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center and the Office of the Federal Register. We also inadvertently included the sentence and paragraph in the PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * regulatory text at 40 CFR 52.320(c)(99)(i)(B). We are correcting the regulatory text to indicate that the sentence and paragraph are not in the SIP. Regulation No. 13 includes a sentence and a paragraph that are State only regulations, and should not be included in the SIP. Therefore, the last sentence in Section II.C.1.c.v. of Regulation No. 13: ‘‘This Section II.C.1.c.v. is repealed effective February 1, 2019 and is replaced by the requirements in Section II.C.1.c.vi. below beginning November 1, 2019.,’’ and Section II.C.1.c.vi. of Regulation No. 13: ‘‘Effective November 1, 2019, the minimum oxygen content by weight shall be at least 2.7% from November 1 through the end of the Oxygenated Gasoline Control Period as defined in Section II.B. The average oxygen content by weight shall be at least 3.1% from November 1 through February 7. This Section II.C.1.c.vi. shall be a state only regulation, and shall not be included in the State Implementation Plan.’’ are being removed from the SIP. II. Statutory and Executive Order Review Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and is therefore not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM 01JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38025-38028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R05-OAR-2005-MN-0002; FRL-7931-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Minnesota

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 
to the sulfur dioxide (SO2) requirements for Flint Hills 
Resources, L.P. (Flint Hills) of Dakota County, Minnesota. Flint Hills 
operates a Rosemont, Minnesota petroleum refinery. The requested 
revisions will allow the refinery to produce ultra low sulfur diesel 
fuel. This expansion will add five sources and create an increase in 
sulfur dioxide emissions. An analysis of the additional sources was 
conducted. The results show that the air quality of Dakota County will 
remain in compliance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards 
(NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 30, 2005 unless EPA receives 
adverse written comments by August 1, 2005. If adverse comment is 
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the 
Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take 
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in E-Docket 
(RME) ID No. R05-OAR-2005-MN-0002 by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Agency Web Site: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA's 
electronic public docket and comments system, is EPA's preferred method 
for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ``quick search,'' 
then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow 
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
    Fax: (312) 886-5824.
    Mail: You may send written comments to: John Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Hand Delivery: Deliver your comments to: John Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional 
Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official 
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05-OAR-2005-MN-
0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in 
the public docket without change, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, 
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web 
site are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know 
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body 
of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting 
comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 
the related proposed rule which is published in the Proposed Rules 
section of this Federal Register.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
RME index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the 
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME 
or

[[Page 38026]]

in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air 
and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 
60604. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau, Environmental 
Engineer, at (312) 886-6524 before visiting the Region 5 office. This 
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
excluding legal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone: (312) 886-6524, E-Mail: 
rau.matthew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' are used we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

I. General Information
    A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
    B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related 
Information?
    C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
II. What is EPA Approving?
III. What are the Changes From the Current Rule?
IV. What is EPA's Analysis of the Supporting Materials?
V. What are the Environmental Effects of These Actions?
VI. What Rulemaking Action is EPA Taking?
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. General Information

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    This action applies to a single source, Flint Hills Resources, 
L.P., whose facility is located in Dakota County, Minnesota.

B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?

    1. The Regional Office has established an electronic public 
rulemaking file available for inspection at RME under ID No. R05-OAR-
2005-MN-0002, and a hard copy file which is available for inspection at 
the Regional Office. The official public file consists of the documents 
specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, 
and other information related to this action. Although a part of the 
official docket, the public rulemaking file does not include CBI or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The 
official public rulemaking file is the collection of materials that is 
available for public viewing at the Air Programs Branch, Air and 
Radiation Division, EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the 
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of 
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding 
Federal holidays.
    2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document 
electronically through the regulations.gov Web site located at https://
www.regulations.gov where you can find, review, and submit comments on 
Federal rules that have been published in the Federal Register, the 
Government's legal newspaper, and are open for comment.
    For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is 
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, 
will be made available for public viewing at the EPA Regional Office, 
as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains 
copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing 
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in 
the version of the comment that is placed in the official public 
rulemaking file. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted 
material, will be available at the Regional Office for public 
inspection.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

    You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand 
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the 
appropriate rulemaking identification number by including the text 
``Public comment on proposed rulemaking Region 5 Air Docket R05-OAR-
2005-MN-0002'' in the subject line on the first page of your comment. 
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified 
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period 
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late 
comments.
    For detailed instructions on submitting public comments and on what 
to consider as you prepare your comments see the ADDRESSES section and 
the section I General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section of the related proposed rule which is published in the Proposed 
Rules section of this Federal Register.

II. What is EPA Approving?

    EPA is approving revisions to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide SIP for 
the Flint Hills refinery. Flint Hills is installing equipment to begin 
producing ultra low sulfur diesel fuel. It is adding a Hydrocracker 
Charge Heater (unit 29H-1), a Hydrocracker Fractionator Heater (29H-2), 
a charge heater for the 4 Hydrogen Plant (30H-1), an emergency 
diesel generator (EE-29-401), and an emergency diesel powered cooling 
water pump (81P 450) to its refinery.

III. What are the Changes From the Current Rule?

    The new sources at the refinery are for the production of ultra low 
sulfur diesel fuel. Operation of the five additional sources could 
increase the SO2 emissions by 125.7 tons per year (TPY).

IV. What is EPA's Analysis of the Supporting Materials?

    Flint Hills conducted air dispersion modeling to assess the effect 
of its proposed new equipment and operating plan on ambient air 
quality. The modelers used the ISCST3 dispersion model in the 
regulatory default mode, with five years of meteorological data from 
the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The SO2 
emissions from other nearby companies were included. When the modeling 
was performed, Flint Hills had not finalized the locations of the new 
boilers and heaters. It modeled the new sources concurrently at three 
potential locations, with each source at its full emission rate. The 
modeled results are more conservative because of this multiple 
counting. Flint Hills' proposed revisions include an option of reducing 
the firing duty of some existing heaters and boilers. To conservatively 
account for this possibility, the modeling included those boilers and 
heaters at their current SO2 emission rates, but at reduced 
stack exit velocities representative of their new usage scenario. This 
rulemaking action concerns only the new sources for producing ultra-low 
sulfur diesel. The modeling also includes the impacts from portable 
diesel equipment. The sulfur dioxide emissions from these sources were 
combined and modeled as from an representative average engine located 
near the facility fence line, where previous modeling analyses had 
shown high ambient impacts to occur. This also should produce a 
conservative result. The final results of the Flint Hills modeling, 
including background SO2 concentrations, were below the 3-
hour, 24-hour, and annual SO2 NAAQS. The

[[Page 38027]]

maximum predicted SO2 concentrations, the modeled plus 
background concentrations, are 242 [mu]g/m\3\ compared to the 365 
[mu]g/m\3\ 24-hour standard and 45 [mu]g/m\3\ compared to the 80 [mu]g/
m\3\ annual standard. The maximum predicted 3-hour SO2 
concentration of 688 [mu]g/m\3\ is below the secondary standard of 1300 
[mu]g/m\3\.

V. What are the Environmental Effects of These Actions?

    Sulfur dioxide causes breathing difficulties and aggravation of 
existing cardiovascular disease. It is also a precursor of acid rain 
and fine particulate matter formation. Sulfate particles are a major 
cause of visibility impairment in America. Acid rain damages lakes and 
streams impairing aquatic life and causes damage to buildings, 
sculptures, statues, and monuments. Sulfur dioxide also causes the loss 
of chloroform leading to vegetation damage.
    The addition of the new sources causes this revision to result in a 
higher sulfur dioxide emissions. The effects of the increased emissions 
were analyzed. Analysis showed that the maximum predicted 
SO2 concentrations are below the primary and secondary air 
quality standards. This indicates that public health and welfare in 
Dakota County, Minnesota should be protected.

VI. What Rulemaking Action is EPA Taking?

    EPA is approving, through direct final rulemaking, revisions to 
sulfur dioxide emissions regulations for Flint Hills Resources, L.P. of 
Dakota County, Minnesota.
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we 
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse 
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal 
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will 
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse 
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective August 30, 2005 
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written 
comments by August 1, 2005. If we receive such comments, we will 
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a 
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public 
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second 
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action 
should do so at this time. If we do not receive any comments, this 
action will be effective August 30, 2005.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Executive Order 12866; Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use

    Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action 
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that 
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state 
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that 
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).

Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments

    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (59 
FR 22951, November 9, 2000).

Executive Order 13132 Federalism

    This action also does not have Federalism implications because it 
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the 
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a 
Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the 
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air 
Act.

Executive Order 13045 Protection of Children From Environmental Health 
and Safety Risks

    This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.

National Technology Transfer Advancement Act

    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
state to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.).

Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

[[Page 38028]]

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 30, 2005.
    Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this 
final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes 
of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition 
for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the 
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged 
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 
307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: June 21, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Subpart Y--Minnesota

0
2. In Sec.  52.1220, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by revising 
the entry for ``Flint Hills Resources, L.P.'' to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *

                                EPA.--Approved Minnesota Source-Specific Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     State
        Name of source            Permit No.    effective date         EPA approval date            Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Flint Hills Resources, L.P.     ..............        06/14/04  06/05/03, 68 FR 33631.........  Amendment Seven
 (formerly Koch Petroleum).                                                                      to Findings and
                                                                                                 Order.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-13060 Filed 6-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.