Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule, 38060-38061 [05-12979]
Download as PDF
38060
§ 4.27
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Vintage wine.
Signed: May 31, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: June 16, 2005.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 05–13041 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1610
RIN 3046–AA75
Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC or the
Commission) is seeking comments on
proposed revisions to its Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) fee schedule.
The updated schedule of fees reflects
increases in the direct costs incurred by
the Commission in responding to
requests for records.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:07 Jun 30, 2005
The agency must receive
comments on or before August 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive
Secretariat, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 1801 L Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20507. As a
convenience to commenters, the
Executive Secretariat will accept
comments of six pages or less
transmitted by facsimile (‘‘FAX’’)
machine. The telephone number of the
FAX receiver is (202) 663–4114. This is
not a toll free number. The six-page
limitation is necessary to assure access
to the equipment. Receipt of FAX
transmissions will not be acknowledged
although a sender may request
confirmation by calling the Executive
Secretariat at (202) 663–4070 (voice) or
(202) 663–4074 (TTY). These are not toll
free numbers. Copies of comments
submitted by the public will be
available for review at the Commission’s
library, room 6502, 1801 L Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of
9:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. Additionally,
members of the public may submit
comments through https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal
Counsel, or Michelle Zinman, Senior
General Attorney at (202) 663–4640
(voice) or (202) 663–7026 (TTY). This
notice is also available in the following
formats: large print, Braille, audiotape
and electronic file on computer disk.
Requests for this notice in an alternative
format should be made to EEOC’s
Publication Center at 1–800–669–3362.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EEOC is
proposing to amend 29 CFR part 1610.
This section contains a schedule of fees
utilized by the Commission for purposes
of assessing costs to individuals who
seek access to records under the FOIA,
5 U.S.C. 552. The present fee schedule
was last amended in 1983 and has
become outdated. It does not reflect
increases in direct costs to the
Commission for manual search and
review of records. Also, it does not
account for technological advances,
including computer searches, the direct
costs of retrieving records from federal
records centers, or the direct costs of
making records available in electronic
and alternative formats. The changes are
being made in accordance with the
Office of Management and Budget’s
Uniform Freedom of Information Act
Fee Schedule and Guidelines, 52 FR
10012 (1987).
The higher costs of manual search and
review are attributable to increases in
the salaries of the involved personnel.
DATES:
(a) General. Vintage wine is wine
labeled with the year of harvest of the
grapes and made in accordance with the
standards prescribed in classes 1, 2, or
3 of § 4.21. The wine must be labeled
with an appellation of origin other than
a country (which does not qualify for
vintage labeling). The appellation must
be shown in direct conjunction with the
designation required by § 4.32(a)(2), in
lettering substantially as conspicuous as
that designation. In no event may the
quantity of wine removed from the
producing winery, under labels bearing
a vintage date, exceed the volume of
vintage wine produced in that winery
during the year indicated by the vintage
date. The following additional rules
apply to vintage labeling:
(1) If an American or imported wine
is labeled with a viticultural area
appellation of origin, at least 95 percent
of the wine must have been derived
from grapes harvested in the labeled
calendar year; or
(2) If an American or imported wine
is labeled with an appellation of origin
other than a country or viticultural area,
at least 85 percent of the wine must
have been derived from grapes
harvested in the labeled calendar year.
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We surveyed our field offices to
determine who was conducting the
FOIA searches and reviews. We found
that the vast majority were done by
clerical or paralegal staff, although some
offices used professional staff. A small
number of field offices reported that
managers sometimes conducted
searches and reviews. Further, at
headquarters, managers and Senior
Executive Service (SES) employees
occasionally conduct searches and
reviews. In order to more accurately
reflect the actual efforts and costs
involved, we are replacing the current
two-tier fee schedule (clerical and
professional) with a five-tier schedule
(clerical, paralegal, professional,
managerial, and Senior Executive
Service (SES) employees). Based upon
our field survey, we determined that the
average grade and step level for clerical
personnel performing these functions
was GS 6/Step 5; for paralegals was GS
11/Step 8; and for professional
personnel was GS 12/Step 5. We
calculated the proposed fees for these
three categories by using the hourly
rates in the U.S. Office of Personnel and
Management’s (OPM) 2005 Salary Table
paid to persons at the average grade/step
indicated in the previous sentence and
adding 16 percent for benefits, as
prescribed by the OMB guidance
referred above. For managers (GS–15)
and SES employees, we used the
average GS–15 and added 16 percent for
benefits.
We added several definitions for
clarification. The terms ‘‘direct cost,’’
‘‘search,’’ and ‘‘duplication’’ have been
defined using standard language that
can be found in the FOIA regulations of
several other government agencies,
including OMB. We also clarified that
requesters will be charged other direct
costs when applicable, e.g., computer
search time, record retrieval costs,
computer duplication costs, etc. Finally,
we have increased the fees for
attestation and certification of records to
better reflect the actual costs of
preparing these documents, and defined
both terms to differentiate them from
each other. The fees for attestation and
certification of records under EEOC’s
Privacy Act regulations will
subsequently be amended to mirror
these fee changes under the FOIA.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866,
EEOC has determined that the
regulation will not have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or more
or adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Proposed Rules
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State or local tribal governments or
communities. Therefore, a detailed costbenefit assessment of the regulation is
not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposal contains no new
information collection requirements
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission, in accordance with
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
606(b)), has reviewed this regulation
and by approving it certifies that this
regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not result in
the expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1610
Freedom of information.
For the Commission.
Cari M. Dominguez,
Chair.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, EEOC proposes to
amend 29 CFR part 1610 as follows:
PART 1610—AVAILABILITY OF
RECORDS
1. The authority citation for part 1610
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000e–12(a), 5 U.S.C.
552 as amended by Pub. L. 93–502, Pub. L.
99–570, and Pub. L. 105–231; for § 1610.15,
non-search or copy portions are issued under
31 U.S.C. 9701.
2. Section 1610.1 is amended by
adding paragraphs (e) through (i) as
follows:
§ 1610.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Direct costs refers to those
expenses that EEOC actually incurs in
searching for and duplicating (and, in
the case of commercial requesters,
reviewing) records to respond to a
request. Direct costs include, for
example, the salary of the employee
performing the work (the basic rate of
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:07 Jun 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
pay for the employee plus 16 percent of
that rate to cover benefits) and the cost
of operating duplicating machinery. Not
included in direct costs are overhead
expenses such as costs of space and
heating or lighting of the facility in
which the records are stored.
(f) Search refers to the time spent
looking for and retrieving material that
is responsive to a request. It includes
page-by-page or line-by-line
identification of information within
documents and also includes reasonable
efforts to locate and retrieve information
from records maintained in electronic
formats. EEOC employees should ensure
that searching for materials is done in
the most efficient and least expensive
manner reasonably possible. For
example, employees shall not search
line-by-line when merely duplicating a
document would be quicker and less
expensive.
(g) Duplication refers to the process of
making a copy of a record or document
necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Such copies can take the form of paper
copy, microform, audio-visual materials,
electronic formats (for example
magnetic tape or disk), among others.
Employees shall honor a requester’s
specified preference of format of
disclosure if the record is readily
reproducible with reasonable efforts in
the requested form by the office
responding to the request.
(h) Attestation refers to the
authentication of copies of Commission
documents by an affidavit or unsworn
declaration from the records custodian
without the Commission Seal.
(i) Certification refers to the
authentication of copies of Commission
documents by an affidavit or unsworn
declaration from the records custodian
under the Commission Seal.
3. Revise § 1610.15(c) to read as
follows:
§ 1610.15 Schedule of fees and method of
payment for services rendered.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Except as otherwise provided, the
following specific fees for direct costs
shall be applicable with respect to
services rendered to members of the
public under this subpart:
(1) For manual search and review
time:
(i) By clerical personnel—at the rate
of $5.00 per quarter hour.
(ii) By paralegals—at the rate of $9.00
per quarter hour.
(iii) By professional personnel—at the
rate of $10.00 per quarter hour.
(iv) By managers—at the rate of
$17.50 per quarter hour.
(v) By SES employees—at the rate of
$20.00 per quarter hour.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38061
(2) For computer searches of records,
requesters will be charged at the actual
direct cost of providing the service. This
includes the operator/programmer
salary apportionable to the search based
on the rates listed in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section.
(3) For copies made by photocopy—
$0.15 per page (maximum of 10 copies).
For copies prepared by computer, such
as tapes or printouts, EEOC will charge
the direct cost incurred by the agency,
including operator time. For other forms
of duplication, EEOC will charge the
actual costs of that duplication.
(4) For attestation of documents—
$25.00 per authenticating affidavit or
declaration. Additionally, there may be
search and review charges assessed in
accordance with the rates listed in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(5) For certification of documents—
$50.00 per authenticating affidavit or
declaration. Additionally, there may be
search and review charges assessed in
accordance with the rates listed in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(6) For each signed statement of
negative result of search for record—
$10.00. Additionally, there may be
search charges assessed in accordance
with the rates listed in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section.
(7) For retrieval of records from a
Federal Records Center—the amount
charged to EEOC for retrieval of such
records.
(8) All other direct costs of search,
review, duplication or delivery (other
than normal mail), shall be charged to
the requester as appropriate in the same
amount as incurred by the agency.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–12979 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 167
[USCG–2005–21650]
Port Access Routes Study: In the
Waters of Montauk Channel and Block
Island Sound
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of study; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
conducting a Port Access Route Study
(PARS) to evaluate the applicability of
and the need for modifications to
current vessel routing measures in the
E:\FR\FM\01JYP1.SGM
01JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38060-38061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12979]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1610
RIN 3046-AA75
Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule
AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or the
Commission) is seeking comments on proposed revisions to its Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) fee schedule. The updated schedule of fees
reflects increases in the direct costs incurred by the Commission in
responding to requests for records.
DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before August 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507. As a
convenience to commenters, the Executive Secretariat will accept
comments of six pages or less transmitted by facsimile (``FAX'')
machine. The telephone number of the FAX receiver is (202) 663-4114.
This is not a toll free number. The six-page limitation is necessary to
assure access to the equipment. Receipt of FAX transmissions will not
be acknowledged although a sender may request confirmation by calling
the Executive Secretariat at (202) 663-4070 (voice) or (202) 663-4074
(TTY). These are not toll free numbers. Copies of comments submitted by
the public will be available for review at the Commission's library,
room 6502, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, between the hours of
9:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. Additionally, members of the public may submit
comments through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal
Counsel, or Michelle Zinman, Senior General Attorney at (202) 663-4640
(voice) or (202) 663-7026 (TTY). This notice is also available in the
following formats: large print, Braille, audiotape and electronic file
on computer disk. Requests for this notice in an alternative format
should be made to EEOC's Publication Center at 1-800-669-3362.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EEOC is proposing to amend 29 CFR part 1610.
This section contains a schedule of fees utilized by the Commission for
purposes of assessing costs to individuals who seek access to records
under the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552. The present fee schedule was last amended
in 1983 and has become outdated. It does not reflect increases in
direct costs to the Commission for manual search and review of records.
Also, it does not account for technological advances, including
computer searches, the direct costs of retrieving records from federal
records centers, or the direct costs of making records available in
electronic and alternative formats. The changes are being made in
accordance with the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Freedom
of Information Act Fee Schedule and Guidelines, 52 FR 10012 (1987).
The higher costs of manual search and review are attributable to
increases in the salaries of the involved personnel. We surveyed our
field offices to determine who was conducting the FOIA searches and
reviews. We found that the vast majority were done by clerical or
paralegal staff, although some offices used professional staff. A small
number of field offices reported that managers sometimes conducted
searches and reviews. Further, at headquarters, managers and Senior
Executive Service (SES) employees occasionally conduct searches and
reviews. In order to more accurately reflect the actual efforts and
costs involved, we are replacing the current two-tier fee schedule
(clerical and professional) with a five-tier schedule (clerical,
paralegal, professional, managerial, and Senior Executive Service (SES)
employees). Based upon our field survey, we determined that the average
grade and step level for clerical personnel performing these functions
was GS 6/Step 5; for paralegals was GS 11/Step 8; and for professional
personnel was GS 12/Step 5. We calculated the proposed fees for these
three categories by using the hourly rates in the U.S. Office of
Personnel and Management's (OPM) 2005 Salary Table paid to persons at
the average grade/step indicated in the previous sentence and adding 16
percent for benefits, as prescribed by the OMB guidance referred above.
For managers (GS-15) and SES employees, we used the average GS-15 and
added 16 percent for benefits.
We added several definitions for clarification. The terms ``direct
cost,'' ``search,'' and ``duplication'' have been defined using
standard language that can be found in the FOIA regulations of several
other government agencies, including OMB. We also clarified that
requesters will be charged other direct costs when applicable, e.g.,
computer search time, record retrieval costs, computer duplication
costs, etc. Finally, we have increased the fees for attestation and
certification of records to better reflect the actual costs of
preparing these documents, and defined both terms to differentiate them
from each other. The fees for attestation and certification of records
under EEOC's Privacy Act regulations will subsequently be amended to
mirror these fee changes under the FOIA.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, EEOC has determined that the
regulation will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy,
[[Page 38061]]
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State or local tribal governments or communities. Therefore,
a detailed cost-benefit assessment of the regulation is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposal contains no new information collection requirements
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 606(b)), has reviewed this regulation and by approving it
certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1610
Freedom of information.
For the Commission.
Cari M. Dominguez,
Chair.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, EEOC
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 1610 as follows:
PART 1610--AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS
1. The authority citation for part 1610 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000e-12(a), 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended by
Pub. L. 93-502, Pub. L. 99-570, and Pub. L. 105-231; for Sec.
1610.15, non-search or copy portions are issued under 31 U.S.C.
9701.
2. Section 1610.1 is amended by adding paragraphs (e) through (i)
as follows:
Sec. 1610.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
(e) Direct costs refers to those expenses that EEOC actually incurs
in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial
requesters, reviewing) records to respond to a request. Direct costs
include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the work
(the basic rate of pay for the employee plus 16 percent of that rate to
cover benefits) and the cost of operating duplicating machinery. Not
included in direct costs are overhead expenses such as costs of space
and heating or lighting of the facility in which the records are
stored.
(f) Search refers to the time spent looking for and retrieving
material that is responsive to a request. It includes page-by-page or
line-by-line identification of information within documents and also
includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information from
records maintained in electronic formats. EEOC employees should ensure
that searching for materials is done in the most efficient and least
expensive manner reasonably possible. For example, employees shall not
search line-by-line when merely duplicating a document would be quicker
and less expensive.
(g) Duplication refers to the process of making a copy of a record
or document necessary to respond to a FOIA request. Such copies can
take the form of paper copy, microform, audio-visual materials,
electronic formats (for example magnetic tape or disk), among others.
Employees shall honor a requester's specified preference of format of
disclosure if the record is readily reproducible with reasonable
efforts in the requested form by the office responding to the request.
(h) Attestation refers to the authentication of copies of
Commission documents by an affidavit or unsworn declaration from the
records custodian without the Commission Seal.
(i) Certification refers to the authentication of copies of
Commission documents by an affidavit or unsworn declaration from the
records custodian under the Commission Seal.
3. Revise Sec. 1610.15(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1610.15 Schedule of fees and method of payment for services
rendered.
* * * * *
(c) Except as otherwise provided, the following specific fees for
direct costs shall be applicable with respect to services rendered to
members of the public under this subpart:
(1) For manual search and review time:
(i) By clerical personnel--at the rate of $5.00 per quarter hour.
(ii) By paralegals--at the rate of $9.00 per quarter hour.
(iii) By professional personnel--at the rate of $10.00 per quarter
hour.
(iv) By managers--at the rate of $17.50 per quarter hour.
(v) By SES employees--at the rate of $20.00 per quarter hour.
(2) For computer searches of records, requesters will be charged at
the actual direct cost of providing the service. This includes the
operator/programmer salary apportionable to the search based on the
rates listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(3) For copies made by photocopy--$0.15 per page (maximum of 10
copies). For copies prepared by computer, such as tapes or printouts,
EEOC will charge the direct cost incurred by the agency, including
operator time. For other forms of duplication, EEOC will charge the
actual costs of that duplication.
(4) For attestation of documents--$25.00 per authenticating
affidavit or declaration. Additionally, there may be search and review
charges assessed in accordance with the rates listed in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section.
(5) For certification of documents--$50.00 per authenticating
affidavit or declaration. Additionally, there may be search and review
charges assessed in accordance with the rates listed in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section.
(6) For each signed statement of negative result of search for
record--$10.00. Additionally, there may be search charges assessed in
accordance with the rates listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(7) For retrieval of records from a Federal Records Center--the
amount charged to EEOC for retrieval of such records.
(8) All other direct costs of search, review, duplication or
delivery (other than normal mail), shall be charged to the requester as
appropriate in the same amount as incurred by the agency.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-12979 Filed 6-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P