Deletion of Methyl Ethyl Ketone; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-to-Know, 37698-37700 [05-12928]
Download as PDF
37698
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 125 / Thursday, June 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This action
will be effective immediately upon
publication in the Federal Register.
6. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among
various levels of government.’’ This
final rule, a technical correction, does
not have federalism implications. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government, as specified in Executive
Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this rule.
7. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This final rule does not
have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. The final rule is
a technical correction and does not
establish any regulatory policy with
tribal implications. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
8. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 applies to any
rule that: (1) is determined to be
‘‘economically significant’’ as defined
under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to
believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory
action meets both criteria, the Agency
must evaluate the environmental health
or safety effects of the planned rule on
children, and explain why the planned
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:12 Jun 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably
feasible alternatives considered by the
Agency. This final rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866 and because the
Agency does not have reason to believe
the environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this final action, a
technical correction, present a
disproportionate risk to children.
9. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations that Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
10. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272) directs
EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus bodies. The
NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through the OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards. This
final rule is a technical correction and
does not involve technical standards.
11. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
To the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, and consistent with
the principles set forth in the report on
the National Performance Review, each
Federal agency must make achieving
environmental justice part of its mission
by identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health and
environmental effects of its programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States and its
territories and possessions, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of
the Mariana Islands. Because this final
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule is a technical correction with no
anticipated significant adverse human
health or environmental effects, the rule
is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 228
Environmental protection, Water
pollution control.
Dated: June 22, 2005.
Ronald A. Kreizenbeck,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set out in the preamble,
chapter I of title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended as set forth
below:
I
PART 228—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 228
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
2. Section 228.15 is amended by
revising paragraph (n)(8)(i) as follows:
I
§ 228.15 Dumping sites designated on a
final basis.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) Location: Overall Site Coordinates:
46°15′31.64″ N, 124°05′09.72″ W;
46°14′17.66″ N, 124°07′14.54″ W;
46°15′02.87″ N, 124°08′11.47″ W;
46°15′52.77″ N, 124°05′42.92″ W. Drop
Zone: 46°15′35.36″ N, 124°05′15.55″ W;
46°14′31.07″ N, 124°07′03.25″ W;
46°14′58.83″ N, 124°07′36.89″ W;
46°15′42.38″ N, 124°05′26.65″ W (All
NAD 83)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–12941 Filed 6–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 372
[TRI–2005–0027; FRL–7532–5]
Deletion of Methyl Ethyl Ketone; Toxic
Chemical Release Reporting;
Community Right-to-Know
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is today amending its
regulations to delete methyl ethyl
ketone (MEK) from the list of chemicals
subject to reporting under section 313 of
the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986
(EPCRA) and section 6607 of the
Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA).
This action is being taken to comply
with a DC Circuit decision and order
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 125 / Thursday, June 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
requiring the Agency to delete MEK.
Because this action is being taken to
conform the regulations to the court’s
order, notice and comment are
unnecessary, and this rule is effective
immediately. Upon promulgation of this
rule, facilities will no longer be required
under EPCRA section 313 to report
releases of and other waste management
information on MEK, including those
that occurred during the 2004 reporting
year.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. TRI–2005–0027. All documents in
the docket are listed in the EDOCKET
index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
EDOCKET or in hard copy at the OEI
Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is 202–
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the OEI Docket is 202–566–1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel R. Bushman, Toxics Release
Inventory Program Division, Office of
Information Analysis and Access
(2844T), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
37699
number: 202–566–0743; fax number:
202–566–0741; e-mail:
bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov, for
specific information on this proposed
rule, or for more information on EPCRA
section 313, the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Hotline,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 5101, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460, Toll free:
1–800–424–9346, in Virginia and
Alaska: 703–412–9810 or Toll free TDD:
1–800–553–7672.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Final Rule Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this proposed rule if you manufacture,
process, or otherwise use methyl ethyl
ketone. Potentially affected categories
and entities may include, but are not
limited to:
Category
Examples of potentially affected entities
Industry ...............................
SIC major group codes 10 (except 1011, 1081, and 1094); 12 (except 1241); or 20 through 39; or industry codes
4911 (limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce); or 4931 (limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce); or 4939 (limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power
for distribution in commerce); or 4953 (limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. section 6921 et seq.); or 5169; or 5171; or 7389 (limited to facilities primarily
engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis).
Federal facilities.
Federal Government ..........
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in the table could also
be affected. To determine whether your
facility would be affected by this action,
you should carefully examine the
applicability criteria in part 372 subpart
B of title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. If you have questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
II. Background and Rationale for
Action
In the Federal Register of March 30,
1998 (63 FR 15195), EPA issued a
Denial of Petition entitled ‘‘Methyl
Ethyl Ketone; Toxic Chemical Release
Reporting; Community Right-to-Know.’’
The denial was in response to a petition
from the Ketones Panel of the Chemical
Manufacturers Association (CMA) that
requested the deletion of methyl ethyl
ketone from the list of chemicals
reportable under EPCRA section 313
and PPA section 6607.
The American Chemistry Council
(formerly CMA) filed suit challenging
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:12 Jun 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
EPA’s decision in the United States
District Court for the District of
Columbia. Subsequently, the court
granted summary judgment in favor of
EPA. See American Chemistry Council
v. Whitman, 309 F.Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C.
2004). On appeal, the Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit
reversed the lower court’s decision,
vacating the lower court’s decision, and
directing the district court to issue an
order to ‘‘direct EPA to delete MEK from
the TRI.’’ 406 F.3d 738, 742 (D.C. Cir.
2005). The Circuit Court issued its
mandate on June 13, 2005 (Ref. 1).
Accordingly, EPA is issuing this final
rule revising the EPCRA section 313 list
of reportable chemicals in 40 CFR
372.65 to delete methyl ethyl ketone.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the noticeand-comment requirements of the
Federal Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 551–706) do not apply where the
Agency ‘‘for good cause finds . . . that
notice and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Because this
action is being taken merely to comply
with the court’s direction and because
the court’s order left EPA no discretion
in implementing that order EPA hereby
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
finds that notice and comment on this
action are unnecessary.
This action is effective immediately
upon publication in the Federal
Register. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), 30day advance notice of a rule is not
required where the Agency provides
otherwise for good cause. EPA finds that
good cause for an immediate effective
date exists in this case, because as
explained below, there would be no
purpose in requiring facilities to file
reports for a chemical that does not
satisfy any of the criteria of EPCRA
section 313(d)(2)(A)–(C).
This action becomes effective June 30,
2005. Since the court order removing
MEK from the TRI was issued before
July 1, 2005 the last year in which
facilities had to file a TRI report for
MEK was 2004, covering releases and
other activities that occurred in 2003.
EPCRA section 313(d)(4) provides that
‘‘[a]ny revision’’ to the section 313 list
of toxic chemicals shall take effect on a
delayed basis. EPA interprets this
delayed effective date provision to
apply only to actions that add chemicals
to the section 313 list. For deletions,
EPA may, in its discretion, make such
actions immediately effective. An
immediate effective date is authorized,
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
37700
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 125 / Thursday, June 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
in these circumstances, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1) because a deletion from the
section 313 list relieves a regulatory
restriction. EPA believes that where a
chemical does not satisfy any of the
criteria of section 313(d)(2)(A)(C), no
purpose is served by requiring facilities
to collect data or file TRI reports for that
chemical, or, therefore, by leaving that
chemical on the section 313 list for any
additional period of time. This
construction of section 313(d)(4) is
consistent with previous rules deleting
chemicals from the section 313 list. For
further discussion of the rationale for
immediate effective dates for EPCRA
section 313 delistings, see 59 FR 33205
(June 28, 1994).
III. References
1. American Chemistry Council v.
Johnson, No. 04–5189, (DC Cir. June 13,
2005).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action, as defined under EO
12866, and therefore does not require
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
or Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). It
also does not meet the requirements for
review under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4), Executive Order
13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999), Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000), Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), or Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). In addition, this rule does not
impose any impact on small entities and
thus does not require preparation of a
regulatory flexibility analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The deletion of methyl ethyl ketone
from the EPCRA section 313 list will
reduce the overall reporting and
recordkeeping burden estimate provided
for EPCRA section 313, but this action
does not require any review or approval
by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:12 Jun 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
seq. until EPA decides to subtract the
total burden eliminated by today’s
action from the EPCRA section 313
overall burden approved by OMB. At
some point in the future, EPA will
determine the total EPCRA section 313
burden associated with the deletion of
methyl ethyl ketone, and will complete
the required Information Collection
Worksheet to adjust the total EPCRA
section 313 estimate. The reporting and
recordkeeping burdens associated with
EPCRA section 313 are approved by
OMB under OMB No. 2070–0093
(EPCRA section 313 base program and
Form R, EPA ICR No. 1363) and under
OMB No. 2070–0145 (Form A, EPA ICR
No. 1704). The current public reporting
burden for EPCRA section 313 is
estimated to be 34.2 hours for a Form R
submitter and 20.6 hours for a Form A
submitter. These estimates include the
time needed for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. For
reporting year 2003 there were 1,515
Form Rs submitted for methyl ethyl
ketone and 108 Form As submitted.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA
will submit a report containing this rule
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. However, section 808 of that
Act provides that any rule for which the
issuing agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefore in the
rule) that notice and public procedure
thereon are impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest, shall
take effect at such time as the agency
promulgating the rule determines (5
U.S.C. 808(2)). As stated previously,
EPA has made such a good cause
finding, including the reasons therefore,
and established an effective date of June
30, 2005. This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 372
Environmental protection,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 24, 2005.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 372 is amended
to read as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for part 372
continues to read as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11013 and 11028.
§ 372.65
[Amended]
2. Section 372.65 is amended by
removing the entry for methyl ethyl
ketone under paragraph (a), and
removing the entire CAS No. entry for
78–93–3 under paragraph (b).
I
[FR Doc. 05–12928 Filed 6–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 401 and 405
[CMS–4064–IFC2]
RIN–0938–AM73
Medicare Program; Changes to the
Medicare Claims Appeal Procedures:
Correcting Amendment to an Interim
Final Rule
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Correcting amendment to an
interim final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This amendment corrects
technical errors in the interim final rule
with comment period that appeared in
the Federal Register, entitled ‘‘Medicare
Program: Changes to the Medicare
Claims Appeal Procedures.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: This correcting
amendment is effective July 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arrah Tabe-Bedward, (410) 786–7129.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We have identified technical errors
and omissions that appeared in the
interim final rule with comment period
entitled ‘‘Medicare Program: Changes to
the Medicare Claims Appeal
Procedures.’’ (FR Doc. 05–4062) (See 70
FR 11420, March 8, 2005.) In this
correcting amendment, we are
correcting these technical errors and
omissions.
II. Correction of Errors
A. Summary of Technical Corrections to
the Preamble
On page 11436 of the preamble, we
identified decisions regarding the timely
submission of claims as not being initial
determinations. We attempted to convey
that this was true whether a provider or
supplier failed to submit a timely claim
for its own purposes or at the request of
a beneficiary or the beneficiary’s
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37698-37700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12928]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 372
[TRI-2005-0027; FRL-7532-5]
Deletion of Methyl Ethyl Ketone; Toxic Chemical Release
Reporting; Community Right-to-Know
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is today amending its regulations to delete methyl ethyl
ketone (MEK) from the list of chemicals subject to reporting under
section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
of 1986 (EPCRA) and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act of
1990 (PPA). This action is being taken to comply with a DC Circuit
decision and order
[[Page 37699]]
requiring the Agency to delete MEK. Because this action is being taken
to conform the regulations to the court's order, notice and comment are
unnecessary, and this rule is effective immediately. Upon promulgation
of this rule, facilities will no longer be required under EPCRA section
313 to report releases of and other waste management information on
MEK, including those that occurred during the 2004 reporting year.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. TRI-2005-0027. All documents in the docket are listed in the
EDOCKET index at https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in
EDOCKET or in hard copy at the OEI Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is
202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is 202-566-
1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel R. Bushman, Toxics Release
Inventory Program Division, Office of Information Analysis and Access
(2844T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-566-0743; fax number: 202-
566-0741; e-mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov, for specific
information on this proposed rule, or for more information on EPCRA
section 313, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Hotline, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 5101, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, Toll free: 1-800-424-
9346, in Virginia and Alaska: 703-412-9810 or Toll free TDD: 1-800-553-
7672.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Final Rule Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this proposed rule if you
manufacture, process, or otherwise use methyl ethyl ketone. Potentially
affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of potentially
Category affected entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry.................................. SIC major group codes 10
(except 1011, 1081, and
1094); 12 (except 1241); or
20 through 39; or industry
codes 4911 (limited to
facilities that combust
coal and/or oil for the
purpose of generating power
for distribution in
commerce); or 4931 (limited
to facilities that combust
coal and/or oil for the
purpose of generating power
for distribution in
commerce); or 4939 (limited
to facilities that combust
coal and/or oil for the
purpose of generating power
for distribution in
commerce); or 4953 (limited
to facilities regulated
under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery
Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C.
section 6921 et seq.); or
5169; or 5171; or 7389
(limited to facilities
primarily engaged in
solvent recovery services
on a contract or fee
basis).
Federal Government........................ Federal facilities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
affected. To determine whether your facility would be affected by this
action, you should carefully examine the applicability criteria in part
372 subpart B of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If you
have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
II. Background and Rationale for Action
In the Federal Register of March 30, 1998 (63 FR 15195), EPA issued
a Denial of Petition entitled ``Methyl Ethyl Ketone; Toxic Chemical
Release Reporting; Community Right-to-Know.'' The denial was in
response to a petition from the Ketones Panel of the Chemical
Manufacturers Association (CMA) that requested the deletion of methyl
ethyl ketone from the list of chemicals reportable under EPCRA section
313 and PPA section 6607.
The American Chemistry Council (formerly CMA) filed suit
challenging EPA's decision in the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia. Subsequently, the court granted summary judgment
in favor of EPA. See American Chemistry Council v. Whitman, 309 F.Supp.
2d 111 (D.D.C. 2004). On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit reversed the lower court's decision, vacating the
lower court's decision, and directing the district court to issue an
order to ``direct EPA to delete MEK from the TRI.'' 406 F.3d 738, 742
(D.C. Cir. 2005). The Circuit Court issued its mandate on June 13, 2005
(Ref. 1).
Accordingly, EPA is issuing this final rule revising the EPCRA
section 313 list of reportable chemicals in 40 CFR 372.65 to delete
methyl ethyl ketone. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the notice-and-
comment requirements of the Federal Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 551-706) do not apply where the Agency ``for good cause finds .
. . that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Because this action
is being taken merely to comply with the court's direction and because
the court's order left EPA no discretion in implementing that order EPA
hereby finds that notice and comment on this action are unnecessary.
This action is effective immediately upon publication in the
Federal Register. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), 30-day advance notice of a
rule is not required where the Agency provides otherwise for good
cause. EPA finds that good cause for an immediate effective date exists
in this case, because as explained below, there would be no purpose in
requiring facilities to file reports for a chemical that does not
satisfy any of the criteria of EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(A)-(C).
This action becomes effective June 30, 2005. Since the court order
removing MEK from the TRI was issued before July 1, 2005 the last year
in which facilities had to file a TRI report for MEK was 2004, covering
releases and other activities that occurred in 2003. EPCRA section
313(d)(4) provides that ``[a]ny revision'' to the section 313 list of
toxic chemicals shall take effect on a delayed basis. EPA interprets
this delayed effective date provision to apply only to actions that add
chemicals to the section 313 list. For deletions, EPA may, in its
discretion, make such actions immediately effective. An immediate
effective date is authorized,
[[Page 37700]]
in these circumstances, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because a deletion
from the section 313 list relieves a regulatory restriction. EPA
believes that where a chemical does not satisfy any of the criteria of
section 313(d)(2)(A)(C), no purpose is served by requiring facilities
to collect data or file TRI reports for that chemical, or, therefore,
by leaving that chemical on the section 313 list for any additional
period of time. This construction of section 313(d)(4) is consistent
with previous rules deleting chemicals from the section 313 list. For
further discussion of the rationale for immediate effective dates for
EPCRA section 313 delistings, see 59 FR 33205 (June 28, 1994).
III. References
1. American Chemistry Council v. Johnson, No. 04-5189, (DC Cir.
June 13, 2005).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This rule is not a significant regulatory action, as defined under
EO 12866, and therefore does not require review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), or
Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). It also does not meet the requirements for review under Title II
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4),
Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule
does not impose any impact on small entities and thus does not require
preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The deletion of methyl ethyl ketone from the EPCRA section 313 list
will reduce the overall reporting and recordkeeping burden estimate
provided for EPCRA section 313, but this action does not require any
review or approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. until EPA decides to subtract the total burden
eliminated by today's action from the EPCRA section 313 overall burden
approved by OMB. At some point in the future, EPA will determine the
total EPCRA section 313 burden associated with the deletion of methyl
ethyl ketone, and will complete the required Information Collection
Worksheet to adjust the total EPCRA section 313 estimate. The reporting
and recordkeeping burdens associated with EPCRA section 313 are
approved by OMB under OMB No. 2070-0093 (EPCRA section 313 base program
and Form R, EPA ICR No. 1363) and under OMB No. 2070-0145 (Form A, EPA
ICR No. 1704). The current public reporting burden for EPCRA section
313 is estimated to be 34.2 hours for a Form R submitter and 20.6 hours
for a Form A submitter. These estimates include the time needed for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. For reporting year 2003 there were 1,515
Form Rs submitted for methyl ethyl ketone and 108 Form As submitted.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. However, section 808 of that Act
provides that any rule for which the issuing agency for good cause
finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons
therefore in the rule) that notice and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, shall
take effect at such time as the agency promulgating the rule determines
(5 U.S.C. 808(2)). As stated previously, EPA has made such a good cause
finding, including the reasons therefore, and established an effective
date of June 30, 2005. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 372
Environmental protection, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 24, 2005.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR part 372 is amended to read as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for part 372 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11013 and 11028.
Sec. 372.65 [Amended]
0
2. Section 372.65 is amended by removing the entry for methyl ethyl
ketone under paragraph (a), and removing the entire CAS No. entry for
78-93-3 under paragraph (b).
[FR Doc. 05-12928 Filed 6-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P