Action Affecting Export Privileges; Mohammed Arastafar; Order Relating to Mohammed Arastafar, 37748-37749 [05-12871]
Download as PDF
37748
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 125 / Thursday, June 30, 2005 / Notices
The petitions were submitted
pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341). Consequently,
the United States Department of
Commerce has initiated separate
investigations to determine whether
increased imports into the United States
of articles like or directly competitive
with those produced by each firm
contributed importantly to total or
partial separation of the firm’s workers,
or threat thereof, and to a decrease in
sales or production of each petitioning
firm. Any party having a substantial
interest in the proceedings may request
a public hearing on the matter. A
request for a hearing must be received
by Trade Adjustment Assistance, Room
7812, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than the close of business of the
tenth calendar day following the
publication of this notice. The Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance official
program number and title of the
program under which these petitions are
submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Dated: June 23, 2005.
Anthony J. Meyer,
Senior Program Analyst, Office of Strategic
Initiatives.
[FR Doc. 05–12894 Filed 6–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[03–BIS–15]
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Mohammed Arastafar; Order Relating
to Mohammed Arastafar
In the Matter of: Mr. Mohammed
Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265
EN Leidschendam, The Netherlands,
Respondent.
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
having initiated an administrative
proceeding against Mohammed
Arastafar, pursuant to Section 766.3 of
the Export Administration Regulations
(currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2005)) (‘‘Regulations’’),1 and
Section 13(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(50 U.S.C. app. 2401–2420 (2000))
1 The charged violations occurred in 2002 and
2003. The Regulations governing the violations at
issue are found in the 2002 and 2003 versions of
the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2002–2003)). The 2005 Regulations establish
the procedures that apply to this matter.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:26 Jun 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
(‘‘Act’’),2 by issuing a charging letter to
Mohammed Arastafar that alleged that
Mohammed Arastafar committed two
violations of the Regulation.
Specifically, the charges are:
1. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(c)—
Solicitation of the Unlicensed Export of
Items to Iran: From on or about July 15,
2002 to on or about January 28, 2003,
Mohammed Arastafar solicited the
export of gas processor parts, items
subject both to the Regulations (EAR99 3)
and the Iranian Transactions
Regulations of the Treasury
Department’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (‘‘OFAC’’) and located in the
United States, to Iran through the
Netherlands without the authorization
from OFAC required by Section 746.7 of
the Regulations.
2. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(e)—
Acting with Knowledge of a Violation: In
connection with the solicitation
referenced in paragraph 1 above,
Mohammed Arastafar ordered the
above-described items with knowledge
that a violation of the Regulations was
intended to occur in connection with
the items. Mohammed Arastafar knew
that U.S. government authorization was
required for the purported export and
would not be obtained.
Whereas, BIS and Mohammed
Arastafar have entered into a Settlement
Agreement pursuant to Section
7661.8(b) of the Regulations whereby
they agreed to settle this matter in
accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms
of such Settlement Agreement;
It is Therefore Ordered:
First, that for a period of five years
from the date of entry of this Order,
Mohammed Arastafar, Westboschlaan,
151A, 2265 EN Leidschendam, The
Netherlands, and when acting for or on
behalf of Mohammed Arastafar, his
representatives, agents, assigns or
employees (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not,
directly or indirectly, participate in any
2 From August 21, 1994 through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice
of August 6, 2004 (69 FR 48763, August 10, 2004),
has continued the Regulations in effect under the
IEEPA.
3 The term ‘‘EAR99’’ refers to items subject to the
Regulations that are not listed on the Commerce
Control List. See 15 CFR 734.3(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software, or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 125 / Thursday, June 30, 2005 / Notices
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Mohammed
Arastafar by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in
the conduct of trade or related services
may also be made subject to the
provisions of the Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
where the only items involved that are
subject to the Regulations are the
foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology.
Fifth, that a copy of this Order shall
be delivered to the United States Coast
Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 Gay
Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202–
4022, notifying that office that this case
is withdrawn from adjudication, as
provided by Section 766.18 of the
Regulations.
Sixth, that the charging letter, the
Settlement Agreement, and this Order
shall be made available to the public
and record of the case as described in
Section 766.22 of the Regulations.
Seventh, that this Order shall be
served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be published in the
Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Entered this 23rd day of June 2005.
Wendy L. Wysong,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–12871 Filed 6–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–OT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of
antidumping and countervailing duty
administrative reviews.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
has received requests to conduct
administrative reviews of various
37749
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders and findings with May
anniversary dates. In accordance with
the Department’s regulations, we are
initiating those administrative reviews.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holly A. Kuga, Office of AD/CVD
Enforcement, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
482–4737.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department has received timely
requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b) (2002), for administrative
reviews of various antidumping and
countervailing duty orders and findings
with May anniversary dates.
Initiation of Reviews:
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating
administrative reviews of the following
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders and findings. We intend to issue
the final results of these reviews not
later than May 31, 2006.
Period to be
reviewed
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Belgium:
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A–423–808 .............................................................................................................................
Ugine & ALZ Belgium
Canada:
Certain Softwood Lumber, A–122–838 ..................................................................................................................................
465016 BC Ltd.
582912 BC Ltd. (dba Paragon Wood Products Lumby)
Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.
Abitibi-LP Engineered Wood Inc.
AJ Forest Products Ltd.
Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd.
Alexandre Cote Ltee.
Allmac Lumber Sales Ltd.
Allmar International
Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
Alpine Forest Trading Inc.
American Bayridge Corporation
Andersen Pacific Forest Ltd.
Anderson Pacific Forest Products
Apex Forest Products, Inc.
Apollo Forest Products Ltd.
Aquila Cedar Products Ltd.
Arbec Forest Products Inc.
Arbutus Manufacturing Limited
Armand Duhamel & Fils Inc.
Aspen Planers Ltd.
Atco Lumber Ltd.
Atikokan Forest Products Ltd.
Atlantic Warehousing Ltd.
Atlas Lumber Alberta Ltd.
AWL Forest Products
B&L Forest Products Ltd.
B.B. Pallets Inc.
Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
Bardeaux et Cedres St-Honore Inc.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:26 Jun 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
5/1/04–4/30/05
5/1/04–4/30/05
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37748-37749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12871]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[03-BIS-15]
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Mohammed Arastafar; Order
Relating to Mohammed Arastafar
In the Matter of: Mr. Mohammed Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265
EN Leidschendam, The Netherlands, Respondent.
The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(``BIS'') having initiated an administrative proceeding against
Mohammed Arastafar, pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export
Administration Regulations (currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730-774
(2005)) (``Regulations''),\1\ and Section 13(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420
(2000)) (``Act''),\2\ by issuing a charging letter to Mohammed
Arastafar that alleged that Mohammed Arastafar committed two violations
of the Regulation. Specifically, the charges are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The charged violations occurred in 2002 and 2003. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are found in the 2002
and 2003 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts
730-774 (2002-2003)). The 2005 Regulations establish the procedures
that apply to this matter.
\2\ From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 2000, the Act was
in lapse. During that period, the President, through Executive Order
12924, which had been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)),
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000))
(``IEEPA''). On November 13, 2000, the Act was reauthorized and it
remained in effect through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended
by the Notice of August 6, 2004 (69 FR 48763, August 10, 2004), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the IEEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(c)--Solicitation of the Unlicensed
Export of Items to Iran: From on or about July 15, 2002 to on or about
January 28, 2003, Mohammed Arastafar solicited the export of gas
processor parts, items subject both to the Regulations (EAR99 \3\) and
the Iranian Transactions Regulations of the Treasury Department's
Office of Foreign Assets Control (``OFAC'') and located in the United
States, to Iran through the Netherlands without the authorization from
OFAC required by Section 746.7 of the Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``EAR99'' refers to items subject to the
Regulations that are not listed on the Commerce Control List. See 15
CFR 734.3(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting with Knowledge of a
Violation: In connection with the solicitation referenced in paragraph
1 above, Mohammed Arastafar ordered the above-described items with
knowledge that a violation of the Regulations was intended to occur in
connection with the items. Mohammed Arastafar knew that U.S. government
authorization was required for the purported export and would not be
obtained.
Whereas, BIS and Mohammed Arastafar have entered into a Settlement
Agreement pursuant to Section 7661.8(b) of the Regulations whereby they
agreed to settle this matter in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement;
It is Therefore Ordered:
First, that for a period of five years from the date of entry of
this Order, Mohammed Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265 EN
Leidschendam, The Netherlands, and when acting for or on behalf of
Mohammed Arastafar, his representatives, agents, assigns or employees
(``Denied Person'') may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any
way in any transaction involving any commodity, software, or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or
in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not
limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation,
[[Page 37749]]
maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to Mohammed Arastafar by affiliation,
ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of
the Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or
other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items
involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced
direct product of U.S.-origin technology.
Fifth, that a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the United
States Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202-4022, notifying that office that this case is withdrawn
from adjudication, as provided by Section 766.18 of the Regulations.
Sixth, that the charging letter, the Settlement Agreement, and this
Order shall be made available to the public and record of the case as
described in Section 766.22 of the Regulations.
Seventh, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and
on BIS, and shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immediately.
Entered this 23rd day of June 2005.
Wendy L. Wysong,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05-12871 Filed 6-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-OT-M