Proposed Guidance on Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, 37378-37379 [05-12859]
Download as PDF
37378
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 29, 2005 / Notices
[FR Doc. 05–12685 Filed 6–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–C
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Proposed Guidance on Voluntary
Voting System Guidelines
United States Election
Assistance Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice of proposed voluntary
Voting System Guidelines and request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EAC is proposing Voluntary
Voting System Guidelines pursuant to
sections 221 and 222 of the Help
America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA)
which was passed by Congress to
modernize the administration of Federal
elections. This marks the first time in
our nation’s history that the Federal
Government has funded an election
reform effort. HAVA provides Federal
funding to help the States meet the
law’s uniform and non-discretionary
administrative requirements, which
include the following new programs and
procedures: (1) Provisional voting, (2)
voting information, (3) statewide voter
registration lists and identification
requirements for first-time registrants,
(4) administrative complaint
procedures, and (5) updated and
upgraded voting equipment.
HAVA also established the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
to administer the Federal funding and to
provide guidance to the States in their
efforts to comply with the HAVA
administrative requirements. Section
202 directs the EAC to adopt voluntary
voting system guidelines, and to provide
for the testing, certification,
decertification, and recertification of
voting system hardware and software.
The purpose of the guidelines is to
provide a set of specifications and
requirements against which voting
systems can be tested to determine if
they provide all the basic functionality,
accessibility, and security capabilities
required of voting systems.
This document, the Voluntary Voting
System Guidelines, is the third iteration
of national level voting system
standards. The Federal Election
Commission published the Performance
and Test Standards for Punchcard,
Marksense and Direct Recording
Electronic Voting Systems in 1990. This
was followed by the Voting Systems
Standards in 2002.
As required by HAVA, EAC formed
the Technical Guidelines Development
Committee (TGDC) to develop an initial
set of recommendations for the
Guidelines. This committee of 15
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jun 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
experts began their work in July 2004
and submitted their recommendations
to the EAC in the 9-month timeline
prescribed by HAVA. The TGDC was
provided with technical support by the
National Institute for Standards and
Technology (NIST), who was given
nearly $3 million dollars by the EAC to
complete this work. This funding
represents the first time the Federal
Government has spent a significant
amount of money on setting guidelines
for voting systems. These latest
Guidelines update and augment the
2002 Voting Systems Standards to
address increasingly complex voting
system technology. Specifically, the
2005 Guidelines address the critical
topics of accessibility, usability, and
security. These Guidelines are
voluntary. States may adopt them in
whole, in part, or not at all. States may
also choose to enact stricter
performance requirements for certifying
their voting systems.
The Guidelines consist of two
volumes. Volume I, entitled ‘‘Voting
System Performance Guidelines,’’
includes new requirements for
accessibility, voting system software
distribution, system setup validation,
and the use of wireless
communications. This volume also
includes a set of optional requirements
for a Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail
component for Direct Recording
Electronic voting systems for use by
those States that have decided to require
this feature for their voting systems. In
addition, it contains an updated
glossary and a conformance clause.
Volume II, entitled ‘‘Voting System
National Certification Guidelines,’’ has
been revised to reflect the new EAC
process for national certification of
voting systems. This process will go into
effect in 2005 and will replace the
voting system qualification process that
has been conducted by the National
Association of State Election Directors
since 1994. Volume II also includes an
updated appendix on procedures for
testing system error rates. Terminology
in both volumes has been revised to
reflect new terminology introduced by
HAVA. The following provides a
summary of the contents of each
volume.
Volume I Summary: Volume I, the
Voting System Performance Guidelines,
describes the requirements for the
electronic components of voting
systems. It is intended for use by the
broadest audience, including voting
system developers, manufacturers and
suppliers; voting system testing labs;
state organizations that certify systems
prior to procurement; state and local
election officials who procure and
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
deploy voting systems; and public
interest organizations that have an
interest in voting systems and voting
system standards. It contains the
following sections:
• Section 1 presents the objectives
and usage of the Guidelines, definitions
of types of voting systems, and a
discussion of how the guidelines and
testing specifications are applied. It also
contains a conformance clause.
• Section 2 describes the functional
capabilities required of voting systems.
• Sections 3 through 5 describe
specific performance standards for
election system hardware, software and
telecommunications.
• Section 6 is a significantly
expanded section on security
requirements for voting systems. It
includes new material for the secure
distribution of voting system software
and for verifying that voting systems are
operating with the correct software.
There are also new requirements for the
use of wireless communications. Since
some States have decided to require a
voter verified paper audit trail
component for their direct recording
electronic (DRE) voting systems,
requirements are included to support
appropriate testing of these components.
These requirements are optional
because there are other currently
available technologies besides paper
audit trails that can be employed to
provide a second method, in addition to
the DRE summary screen, for voters to
verify their ballot choices. There was
insufficient time to develop
requirements for these other
technologies for the present Guidelines,
but these technologies, including audio,
video, and cryptographic means, will be
addressed in the near future.
• Sections 7 and 8 describe
requirements for vendor quality
assurance and configuration
management practices and the
documentation required about these
practices for the certification process.
• Appendix A contains a glossary of
terms.
• Appendix B provides a list of
documents incorporated into the
Guidelines by reference, as well as
documents used in preparation of the
Guidelines.
• Appendix C contains best practices
for election officials regarding
accessibility, paper audit trails, and
wireless.
• Appendix D presents an
informational discussion of
independent dual verification which is
a concept being examined for potential
future application to voting systems. In
essence, this is a methodology to
produce multiple independent records
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 29, 2005 / Notices
of ballot choices for verification
purposes. Voter verified paper audit
trails do not provide independent
verification because the printer prints
from the same data source that produces
the DRE summary screen display.
• Appendix E contains the NASED
Voting System Standards Board
Technical Guide #1 on color and
contrast adjustment for individuals with
low vision or color blindness.
Volume II Summary: Volume II, the
Voting System National Certification
Testing Guidelines, is a complementary
document to Volume I. Volume II
provides an overview and specific detail
of the national certification testing
process, which is performed by
independent voting system test labs
accredited by the EAC. It is intended
principally for use by vendors, test labs,
and election officials who certify,
procure, and accept voting systems.
This volume contains the following
sections:
• Section 1 presents an overview of
the testing guidelines and the national
certification testing process.
• Section 2 provides a description of
the Technical Data Package that vendors
are required to submit with their system
for certification testing.
• Section 3 describes the basic
functionality testing requirements.
• Sections 4 through 6 define the
requirements for hardware, software and
system integration testing.
• Section 7 describes the required
examination of vendor quality assurance
and configuration management
practices.
• Appendix A provides the
requirements for the National
Certification Test Plan that is prepared
by the voting system test lab and
provided to the EAC for review.
• Appendix B describes the scope
and content of the National Certification
Test Report which is prepared by the
test lab and delivered to the EAC along
with a recommendation for certification.
• Appendix C describes the guiding
principles used to design the voting
system certification testing process. It
also contains a revised section on
testing system error rates.
The format of the Guidelines is
intended to facilitate ease of identifying
new information and comparison with
the 2002 Voting Systems Standards.
New material is indicated by a grayshaded header with the words ‘‘NEW
MATERIAL,’’ and includes line
numbers. Material essentially carried
forward in its entirety from the 2002
Voting Systems Standards remains in its
original format and does not include
line numbers. Selected portions of this
material have been revised to reflect the
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:40 Jun 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
EAC process for voting system
certification, specifically Volume I,
Section 1.6.1, and Volume II Section 1.
Updates have been made throughout to
include new terminology introduced by
HAVA.
Comments: The Voluntary Voting
System Guidelines is provided for
comment by the public for the next 90
days. All comments must be received by
EAC on or before 5 p.m. EDT on
September 30, 2005. All comments will
posted on the EAC Web site. The EAC
is provided several alternative methods
for submitting comments.
• On-line electronic comment form at
https://www.eac.gov.
• By e-mail to
votingsystemguidelines@eac.gov.
• By mail to Voting System
Guidelines Comments, U.S. Election
Assistance Commission, 1225 New York
Ave, NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC
20005.
• By fax to Voting System Guidelines
Comments at (202) 566–3127.
EAC requests that comments be
provided according to the following
specifications:
(1) Comments regarding a particular
section should be designed by the page,
line (if included) and section number to
which the comment refers.
(2) Comments regarding a term that is
included or that should be added to the
glossary should reference the term and
page number to which the comment
refers.
(3) General comments regarding the
entire document or comments that refer
to more than one section should be
made as specifically as possible so that
EAC can clearly understand to which
portion(s) of the documents the
comment refers.
(4) To the extent that a comment
suggests a change in the wording of a
requirement or section of the
Guidelines, please provide proposed
language for the suggested change.
To obtain a copy of the voluntary
voting system guidelines: Due to the fact
that the Voluntary Voting System
Guidelines is more than 250 pages in
length, the entire documents has not
been attached to this notice. A complete
copy of the Voluntary Voting System
Guidelines is available from EAC in
electronic or hard copy format. An
electronic copy can be downloaded in
PDF format or read in HTML version on
EAC’s Web site, https://www.eac.gov. In
addition, interested persons may obtain
a hard copy or CD–ROM electronic copy
from EAC by contacting Voting System
Guidelines, via fax at 202–566–3128, via
e-mail at
VotingSystemGuidelines@eac.gov, or via
mail at Voting System Guidelines, U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37379
Election Assistance Commission, 1225
New York Avenue, NW., Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20005. You may also
request by phone at (866) 747–1471.
Please specify whether a hard copy or
electronic copy is desired.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol A. Paquette, Phone (202) 566–
3125, fax (202) 566–3128, e-mail
cpaquette@eac.gov.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–12859 Filed 6–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
Federal Energy Management Advisory
Committee
Department of Energy.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice announces an
open meeting of the Federal Energy
Management Advisory Committee
(FEMAC). The Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Public Law 92–463, 86
Stat. 770) requires that these meetings
be announced in the Federal Register to
allow for public participation. This
notice announces the tenth FEMAC
public meeting, an advisory committee
established under Executive Order
13123—‘‘Greening the Government
through Efficient Energy Management.’’
DATES: Monday, August 15, 2005; 6 to
7 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Long Beach Convention
Center, 300 East Ocean Boulevard,
Room 101, Long Beach, CA 90802.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
Klimkos, Designated Federal Officer,
Office of Federal Energy Management
Programs, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586–8287.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Meeting: To seek input
and feedback from interested parties on
working group recommendations to
meet mandated Federal energy
management goals.
Tentative Agenda: Agenda will
include discussions on the following
topics:
Æ Update on FEMAC Working
Groups.
Æ Discussion on FEMAC priorities.
Æ Open discussion with public.
Public Participation: In keeping with
procedures, members of the public are
welcome to observe the business of the
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37378-37379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12859]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Proposed Guidance on Voluntary Voting System Guidelines
AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice of proposed voluntary Voting System Guidelines and
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EAC is proposing Voluntary Voting System Guidelines pursuant
to sections 221 and 222 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA)
which was passed by Congress to modernize the administration of Federal
elections. This marks the first time in our nation's history that the
Federal Government has funded an election reform effort. HAVA provides
Federal funding to help the States meet the law's uniform and non-
discretionary administrative requirements, which include the following
new programs and procedures: (1) Provisional voting, (2) voting
information, (3) statewide voter registration lists and identification
requirements for first-time registrants, (4) administrative complaint
procedures, and (5) updated and upgraded voting equipment.
HAVA also established the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
to administer the Federal funding and to provide guidance to the States
in their efforts to comply with the HAVA administrative requirements.
Section 202 directs the EAC to adopt voluntary voting system
guidelines, and to provide for the testing, certification,
decertification, and recertification of voting system hardware and
software. The purpose of the guidelines is to provide a set of
specifications and requirements against which voting systems can be
tested to determine if they provide all the basic functionality,
accessibility, and security capabilities required of voting systems.
This document, the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, is the third
iteration of national level voting system standards. The Federal
Election Commission published the Performance and Test Standards for
Punchcard, Marksense and Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems in
1990. This was followed by the Voting Systems Standards in 2002.
As required by HAVA, EAC formed the Technical Guidelines
Development Committee (TGDC) to develop an initial set of
recommendations for the Guidelines. This committee of 15 experts began
their work in July 2004 and submitted their recommendations to the EAC
in the 9-month timeline prescribed by HAVA. The TGDC was provided with
technical support by the National Institute for Standards and
Technology (NIST), who was given nearly $3 million dollars by the EAC
to complete this work. This funding represents the first time the
Federal Government has spent a significant amount of money on setting
guidelines for voting systems. These latest Guidelines update and
augment the 2002 Voting Systems Standards to address increasingly
complex voting system technology. Specifically, the 2005 Guidelines
address the critical topics of accessibility, usability, and security.
These Guidelines are voluntary. States may adopt them in whole, in
part, or not at all. States may also choose to enact stricter
performance requirements for certifying their voting systems.
The Guidelines consist of two volumes. Volume I, entitled ``Voting
System Performance Guidelines,'' includes new requirements for
accessibility, voting system software distribution, system setup
validation, and the use of wireless communications. This volume also
includes a set of optional requirements for a Voter Verified Paper
Audit Trail component for Direct Recording Electronic voting systems
for use by those States that have decided to require this feature for
their voting systems. In addition, it contains an updated glossary and
a conformance clause. Volume II, entitled ``Voting System National
Certification Guidelines,'' has been revised to reflect the new EAC
process for national certification of voting systems. This process will
go into effect in 2005 and will replace the voting system qualification
process that has been conducted by the National Association of State
Election Directors since 1994. Volume II also includes an updated
appendix on procedures for testing system error rates. Terminology in
both volumes has been revised to reflect new terminology introduced by
HAVA. The following provides a summary of the contents of each volume.
Volume I Summary: Volume I, the Voting System Performance
Guidelines, describes the requirements for the electronic components of
voting systems. It is intended for use by the broadest audience,
including voting system developers, manufacturers and suppliers; voting
system testing labs; state organizations that certify systems prior to
procurement; state and local election officials who procure and deploy
voting systems; and public interest organizations that have an interest
in voting systems and voting system standards. It contains the
following sections:
Section 1 presents the objectives and usage of the
Guidelines, definitions of types of voting systems, and a discussion of
how the guidelines and testing specifications are applied. It also
contains a conformance clause.
Section 2 describes the functional capabilities required
of voting systems.
Sections 3 through 5 describe specific performance
standards for election system hardware, software and
telecommunications.
Section 6 is a significantly expanded section on security
requirements for voting systems. It includes new material for the
secure distribution of voting system software and for verifying that
voting systems are operating with the correct software. There are also
new requirements for the use of wireless communications. Since some
States have decided to require a voter verified paper audit trail
component for their direct recording electronic (DRE) voting systems,
requirements are included to support appropriate testing of these
components. These requirements are optional because there are other
currently available technologies besides paper audit trails that can be
employed to provide a second method, in addition to the DRE summary
screen, for voters to verify their ballot choices. There was
insufficient time to develop requirements for these other technologies
for the present Guidelines, but these technologies, including audio,
video, and cryptographic means, will be addressed in the near future.
Sections 7 and 8 describe requirements for vendor quality
assurance and configuration management practices and the documentation
required about these practices for the certification process.
Appendix A contains a glossary of terms.
Appendix B provides a list of documents incorporated into
the Guidelines by reference, as well as documents used in preparation
of the Guidelines.
Appendix C contains best practices for election officials
regarding accessibility, paper audit trails, and wireless.
Appendix D presents an informational discussion of
independent dual verification which is a concept being examined for
potential future application to voting systems. In essence, this is a
methodology to produce multiple independent records
[[Page 37379]]
of ballot choices for verification purposes. Voter verified paper audit
trails do not provide independent verification because the printer
prints from the same data source that produces the DRE summary screen
display.
Appendix E contains the NASED Voting System Standards
Board Technical Guide 1 on color and contrast adjustment for
individuals with low vision or color blindness.
Volume II Summary: Volume II, the Voting System National
Certification Testing Guidelines, is a complementary document to Volume
I. Volume II provides an overview and specific detail of the national
certification testing process, which is performed by independent voting
system test labs accredited by the EAC. It is intended principally for
use by vendors, test labs, and election officials who certify, procure,
and accept voting systems. This volume contains the following sections:
Section 1 presents an overview of the testing guidelines
and the national certification testing process.
Section 2 provides a description of the Technical Data
Package that vendors are required to submit with their system for
certification testing.
Section 3 describes the basic functionality testing
requirements.
Sections 4 through 6 define the requirements for hardware,
software and system integration testing.
Section 7 describes the required examination of vendor
quality assurance and configuration management practices.
Appendix A provides the requirements for the National
Certification Test Plan that is prepared by the voting system test lab
and provided to the EAC for review.
Appendix B describes the scope and content of the National
Certification Test Report which is prepared by the test lab and
delivered to the EAC along with a recommendation for certification.
Appendix C describes the guiding principles used to design
the voting system certification testing process. It also contains a
revised section on testing system error rates.
The format of the Guidelines is intended to facilitate ease of
identifying new information and comparison with the 2002 Voting Systems
Standards. New material is indicated by a gray-shaded header with the
words ``NEW MATERIAL,'' and includes line numbers. Material essentially
carried forward in its entirety from the 2002 Voting Systems Standards
remains in its original format and does not include line numbers.
Selected portions of this material have been revised to reflect the EAC
process for voting system certification, specifically Volume I, Section
1.6.1, and Volume II Section 1. Updates have been made throughout to
include new terminology introduced by HAVA.
Comments: The Voluntary Voting System Guidelines is provided for
comment by the public for the next 90 days. All comments must be
received by EAC on or before 5 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2005. All
comments will posted on the EAC Web site. The EAC is provided several
alternative methods for submitting comments.
On-line electronic comment form at https://www.eac.gov.
By e-mail to votingsystemguidelines@eac.gov.
By mail to Voting System Guidelines Comments, U.S.
Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20005.
By fax to Voting System Guidelines Comments at (202) 566-
3127.
EAC requests that comments be provided according to the following
specifications:
(1) Comments regarding a particular section should be designed by
the page, line (if included) and section number to which the comment
refers.
(2) Comments regarding a term that is included or that should be
added to the glossary should reference the term and page number to
which the comment refers.
(3) General comments regarding the entire document or comments that
refer to more than one section should be made as specifically as
possible so that EAC can clearly understand to which portion(s) of the
documents the comment refers.
(4) To the extent that a comment suggests a change in the wording
of a requirement or section of the Guidelines, please provide proposed
language for the suggested change.
To obtain a copy of the voluntary voting system guidelines: Due to
the fact that the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines is more than 250
pages in length, the entire documents has not been attached to this
notice. A complete copy of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines is
available from EAC in electronic or hard copy format. An electronic
copy can be downloaded in PDF format or read in HTML version on EAC's
Web site, https://www.eac.gov. In addition, interested persons may
obtain a hard copy or CD-ROM electronic copy from EAC by contacting
Voting System Guidelines, via fax at 202-566-3128, via e-mail at
VotingSystemGuidelines@eac.gov, or via mail at Voting System
Guidelines, U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Avenue,
NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005. You may also request by phone at
(866) 747-1471. Please specify whether a hard copy or electronic copy
is desired.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol A. Paquette, Phone (202) 566-
3125, fax (202) 566-3128, e-mail cpaquette@eac.gov.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-12859 Filed 6-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M