Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog Management at Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 37108-37109 [05-12751]
Download as PDF
37108
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices
Notice of Intent to Establish a
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee.
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Denali National Park and Preserve,
Alaska; Revised Draft Backcountry
Management Plan, General
Management Plan Amendment and
Environmental Impact Statement
National Park Service, Interior.
Extension of the public
comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) announces that the public
comment period for the Revised Draft
Backcountry Management Plan, General
Management Plan Amendment, and
Environmental Impact Statement for
Denali National Park and Preserve,
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, April 26, 2005 (70 FR 103),
has been extended to July 15, 2005. The
original comment period was through
June 30, 2005.
DATES: Comments on the revised draft
plan and EIS will be accepted through
July 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
revised draft plan and EIS should be
submitted to the Superintendent, Denali
National Park and Preserve, Post Office
Box 9, Denali Park, Alaska 99755.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Tranel, Chief of Planning, Denali
National Park and Preserve, 240 West
5th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99501.
Telephone (907) 644–3611, Fax (907)
644–3803.
Electronic Access and Filing Addresses
Submit electronic comments to
dena_bc_plan_comment@nps.gov. The
revised draft EIS may be viewed online
by following the Revised Draft
Backcountry Management Plan link on
the Denali homepage at https://
www.nps.gov/dena. Hard copies or CDs
of the Revised Draft Backcountry
Management Plan and General
Management Plan Amendment and EIS
are available by request from the
aforementioned address.
Dated: June 22, 2005.
Anne D. Castellina,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska Region.
[FR Doc. 05–12750 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
AGENCY:
National Park Service, Interior.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior
is giving notice of her intent to establish
the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
(GGNR) to negotiate and develop a
special regulation (proposed rule) for
dog management at Golden Gate
National Recreation Area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian O’Neill, Superintendent, Golden
Gate National Recreation Area, Fort
Mason, Building 201, San Francisco,
California, 94123; 415–561–4720.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
comment on the proposal to create this
Committee. In addition, any persons
who believe that they will be affected
significantly by the special regulation
and who believe their interests will not
be represented adequately by the
persons identified in this Notice are
invited to apply for or nominate another
person for membership on the
Committee. Each application must
contain the information described in he
‘‘Application for Membership’’ section
below. Applications or nominations for
membership on the Committee must be
received by close of business on July 28,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and applications
for membership must be submitted to
Brian O’Neill, Superintendent, Golden
Gate National Recreation Area, Fort
Mason, Building 201, San Francisco,
California 94123 (Attn: Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee). As an
alternative, comments and applications
may be submitted by electronic mail to
GOGAlReglNeg@nps.gov. Please Put
‘‘Negotiated Rulemaking Committee’’ in
the subject line. Comments and
applications received will be available
for inspection at the address listed
above from 8:30 a.m., to 4:30 p.m., p.s.t.,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
establishment of this committee is in the
public interest and supports the
National Park Service (NPS) in
performing its duties and
responsibilities under the NPS Organic
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1 et. seq., the Endangered
species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; and
the Golden Gate National Recreation
Area Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb et seq.
The Committee will negotiate to reach
consensus on concepts and language to
use as the basis for a special regulation
for dog management at GGNRA. The
NPS’s existing regulation, codified at 36
CFR 2.15, has not been effective in
resolving longstanding, controversial
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
resource management and public use
conflicts and safety issues at Golden
Gate National Recreation Area. With the
participation of knowledgeable and
affected parties, NPS expects to develop
practical approach to resolve conflicts
and issues which include: the
protection of cultural and natural
resources; competing visitor uses; the
safety of visitors and staff; and the
public desire to walk their dogs offleash in certain areas of GGNRA.
Scope of the Proposed Rule. Within
the constraints of NPS authorities,
policies, planning guidelines, and
information on park setting, natural and
cultural resources, public safety, and
context of the unique urban
environment within which GGNRA fits,
the Committee will address key issues
during the negotiations, including, but
not limited to: areas of the park that
could be designated for off-leash dog
walking areas; periods of use and times
of day and year during which off-leash
areas may be used; use limits and other
conditions that would govern off-leash
use within GGNRA, including the use
and limits of professional dog walking.
The following areas of the park, in
which pets have never been allowed
(i.e., there is not history of dog walking
use and/or it has not been an issue) or
have been restricted due to sensitivity of
resources, are precluded from
consideration by the Committee for off
leash uses: Alcatraz; China Beach;
Crissy Beach tidal marsh and wildlife
protection area as designated by the
1996 Crissy Field Plan Environment
Assessment; East Fort Baker Pier; areas
closed to visitor and pet access at Fort
Funston; Kirby Cove; Muir Woods;
Phleger Estate; Fort Point historic
structure; the beach at Stinson Beach;
Tennessee Valley; Muir Beach Lagoon;
Rodeo Lagoon; Rodeo Lake; Redwood
Creek; all trails in undeveloped areas;
all areas closed to off-trail travel; and all
freshwater bodies in the park.
On-leash dog walking could be
considered in areas with threatened and
endangered species only if it is
demonstrated that adverse effects or
impacts are minimal and could be
mitigated. New NPS lands that come
under the management of GGNRA in the
future will be evaluated for appropriate
recreational uses, including dog
walking, and any approved dog walking
use will be consistent with the new
special regulation for dogwalking in
GGNRA.
The legal sideboards within which
recommendations on dog management
in GGNRA must be formed include, but
may not be limited to the following:
• GGNRA enabling legislation (Public
Law 92–589)
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices
• The NPS Organic Act
• The Administrative Procedure Act
• The Endangered Species Act
• The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA)
• The National Historic Preservation
Act
• Relevant case law
• Applicable Federal regulations
• NPS Management Policies 2001
• Existing park management plans
List of Interests Significantly Affected.
The NPS has identified a number of
interests who are likely to be affected by
the rule. Those parties are residents of
San Francisco, Marin, and San Meteo
Counties; conservation and
environmental organizations; off-leash
dog walking organizations; equestrian
organizations; organizations advocating
for parents and children; visitor user
groups; and Federal, State, and regional
land use management and wildlife
management agencies. Other parties
who believe they are likely to be
affected significantly by the rule may
apply for membership on the Committee
pursuant to the ‘‘Application for
Membership’’ section below.
Proposed Agenda and Schedule for
Publication of Proposed Rule. Members
of the Committee, with the assistance of
a neutral facilitator, will determine the
agenda for the Committee’s work, which
will include interactions with the
concurrent NEPA process for dog
management in GGNRA. Although the
negotiated rulemaking and NEPA
processes are complex, barring
unforeseen circumstances, we anticipate
publishing a proposed rule in the
Federal Register before June 2007.
Administrative Support. To the extent
authorized by law, the NPS will fund
the costs of the Committee, keep a
record of all Committee meetings, and
provide administrative support and
technical assistance for the expertise in
resource management and operations to
facilitate the Committee’s work.
Committee Membership. In
accordance with the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act, membership is limited
to 25, with each member having an
alternate. The following membership is
proposed for the Negotiated Rulemaking
Advisory Committee for Dog
Management Regulation at Golden Gate
National Recreation Area:
1. The interests of the Department of
the Interior will be represented by:
National Park Service—Christine Powell
Alternate—Howard Levitt
2. The interests of organizations and
visitors advocating off-leash use will be
represented by:
a. Crissy Field Dog Group—Martha
Walters
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
Alternate—Chris Griffith
b. Fort Funston Dog Walkers—Linda
McKay
Alternate—Karin Hu
c. Ocean Beach Dog Owners—John
Keating
Alternate—Suzanne Valente
d. Pacifica Dog Walkers—Jeri Flinn
Alternate—Anne Farrow
e. Presidio Dog Walkers—Gary Fergus
Alternate—Carol Copsey
f. San Francisco Dog Owners Group—
Keith McAllister
Alternate—Carol Arnold
3. The interests of commercial dog
walking businesses will be represented
by:
ProDog—Joe Hague
Alternate—Donna Sproull
4. The interests of environmental
organizations will be represented by:
a. California Native Plant Society—Mark
Heath
Alternate—Jake Sigg
b. Center for Biological Diversity—Brent
Plater
Alternate—Jeff Miller
c. Golden Gate Audubon Society—
Arthur Feinstein
Alternate—Elizabeth Murdock
d. Marine Mammal Center—Erin Brodie
Alternate—Joanne Mohr (Farallones
Marine Sanctuary Association)
e. Sierra Club (Local Chapter)—Norman
LaForce
Alternate—Gordon Bennett
f. San Francisco League of Conservation
Voters—Stephen Krefting
Alternate—Michelle Jesperson
5. The interests of visitors user groups
will be represented by:
a. Coleman Advocates for Youth—David
Robinson
Alternate—Marybeth Wallace
b. Equestrian Groups—Judy Teichman
(Marinwatch)
Alternate—Alice Caldwell-Steele
(Miwok Valley Association)
c. Senior Action Network—Bruce
Livingston
Alternate—Bob Planthold
d. Marin Humane Society—Cindy
Machado
Alternate—Steve Hill
e. San Francisco SPCA—Daniel Crain
Alternate—Christine Rosenblatt
6. The interests of local governments
will be represented by:
a. City of San Francisco—Dan McKenna
Alternate—Lemar Morrison
b. Former member of GGNRA Citizens
Advisory Commission—Paul Jones
Alternate—Betsey Cutler
c. Presidio Trust—Joanne Marchetta
Alternate—Al Rosen
Application for Membership. Persons
who believe that they will be affected
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37109
significantly by proposals to revise dog
management at Golden Gate National
Recreation Area and who believe that
such interests will not be represented
adequately by any person identified in
the ‘‘Committee Membership’’ section
above may apply for or nominate
another person for membership on the
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
In order to be considered, each
application or nomination must include:
1. The name of the applicant or
nominee and a description of the
interest(s) such person is to represent;
2. Evidence that the applicant or
nominee is authorized to represent
parties related to the interest(s) the
person is proposed to represent;
3. A written statement that the
applicant or nominee will actively
participate in good faith in the
development of the proposed rule; and
4. The reasons that the proposed
members of the committee identified
above do not represent the interests of
the person submitting the application or
nomination.
To be considered, the application
must be complete and received by the
close of business on July 28, 2005 at the
location indicated in the ‘‘Address’’
section above. Full consideration will be
given to all applications and
nominations timely submitted. The
decision whether or not to add a person
to the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
will be based on a determination by the
NPS whether an interest of that person
will be affected significantly by the
proposed rule; whether an interest of
that person will be affected significantly
by the proposed rule; whether that
interest is already represented
adequately on the Committee, and if not
represented adequately, whether the
applicant or nominee would represent it
adequately.
Certification: I hereby certify that the
administrative establishment of the
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area is
necessary and in the public interest in
connection with the performance of
duties imposed on the Department of
the Interior by the Act of August 25,
1916, 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and other
statues relating to the administration of
the National Park System.
Dated: June 17, 2005.
Gale A. Norton,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 05–12751 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–M
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37108-37109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12751]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Establish a Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior is giving notice of her intent
to establish the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog
Management at Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNR) to negotiate
and develop a special regulation (proposed rule) for dog management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian O'Neill, Superintendent, Golden
Gate National Recreation Area, Fort Mason, Building 201, San Francisco,
California, 94123; 415-561-4720.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to comment on the proposal to
create this Committee. In addition, any persons who believe that they
will be affected significantly by the special regulation and who
believe their interests will not be represented adequately by the
persons identified in this Notice are invited to apply for or nominate
another person for membership on the Committee. Each application must
contain the information described in he ``Application for Membership''
section below. Applications or nominations for membership on the
Committee must be received by close of business on July 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and applications for membership must be submitted
to Brian O'Neill, Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area,
Fort Mason, Building 201, San Francisco, California 94123 (Attn:
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee). As an alternative, comments and
applications may be submitted by electronic mail to GOGA--Reg--
Neg@nps.gov. Please Put ``Negotiated Rulemaking Committee'' in the
subject line. Comments and applications received will be available for
inspection at the address listed above from 8:30 a.m., to 4:30 p.m.,
p.s.t., Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The establishment of this committee is in
the public interest and supports the National Park Service (NPS) in
performing its duties and responsibilities under the NPS Organic Act,
16 U.S.C. 1 et. seq., the Endangered species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.; and the Golden Gate National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb
et seq.
The Committee will negotiate to reach consensus on concepts and
language to use as the basis for a special regulation for dog
management at GGNRA. The NPS's existing regulation, codified at 36 CFR
2.15, has not been effective in resolving longstanding, controversial
resource management and public use conflicts and safety issues at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area. With the participation of
knowledgeable and affected parties, NPS expects to develop practical
approach to resolve conflicts and issues which include: the protection
of cultural and natural resources; competing visitor uses; the safety
of visitors and staff; and the public desire to walk their dogs off-
leash in certain areas of GGNRA.
Scope of the Proposed Rule. Within the constraints of NPS
authorities, policies, planning guidelines, and information on park
setting, natural and cultural resources, public safety, and context of
the unique urban environment within which GGNRA fits, the Committee
will address key issues during the negotiations, including, but not
limited to: areas of the park that could be designated for off-leash
dog walking areas; periods of use and times of day and year during
which off-leash areas may be used; use limits and other conditions that
would govern off-leash use within GGNRA, including the use and limits
of professional dog walking. The following areas of the park, in which
pets have never been allowed (i.e., there is not history of dog walking
use and/or it has not been an issue) or have been restricted due to
sensitivity of resources, are precluded from consideration by the
Committee for off leash uses: Alcatraz; China Beach; Crissy Beach tidal
marsh and wildlife protection area as designated by the 1996 Crissy
Field Plan Environment Assessment; East Fort Baker Pier; areas closed
to visitor and pet access at Fort Funston; Kirby Cove; Muir Woods;
Phleger Estate; Fort Point historic structure; the beach at Stinson
Beach; Tennessee Valley; Muir Beach Lagoon; Rodeo Lagoon; Rodeo Lake;
Redwood Creek; all trails in undeveloped areas; all areas closed to
off-trail travel; and all freshwater bodies in the park.
On-leash dog walking could be considered in areas with threatened
and endangered species only if it is demonstrated that adverse effects
or impacts are minimal and could be mitigated. New NPS lands that come
under the management of GGNRA in the future will be evaluated for
appropriate recreational uses, including dog walking, and any approved
dog walking use will be consistent with the new special regulation for
dogwalking in GGNRA.
The legal sideboards within which recommendations on dog management
in GGNRA must be formed include, but may not be limited to the
following:
GGNRA enabling legislation (Public Law 92-589)
[[Page 37109]]
The NPS Organic Act
The Administrative Procedure Act
The Endangered Species Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The National Historic Preservation Act
Relevant case law
Applicable Federal regulations
NPS Management Policies 2001
Existing park management plans
List of Interests Significantly Affected. The NPS has identified a
number of interests who are likely to be affected by the rule. Those
parties are residents of San Francisco, Marin, and San Meteo Counties;
conservation and environmental organizations; off-leash dog walking
organizations; equestrian organizations; organizations advocating for
parents and children; visitor user groups; and Federal, State, and
regional land use management and wildlife management agencies. Other
parties who believe they are likely to be affected significantly by the
rule may apply for membership on the Committee pursuant to the
``Application for Membership'' section below.
Proposed Agenda and Schedule for Publication of Proposed Rule.
Members of the Committee, with the assistance of a neutral facilitator,
will determine the agenda for the Committee's work, which will include
interactions with the concurrent NEPA process for dog management in
GGNRA. Although the negotiated rulemaking and NEPA processes are
complex, barring unforeseen circumstances, we anticipate publishing a
proposed rule in the Federal Register before June 2007.
Administrative Support. To the extent authorized by law, the NPS
will fund the costs of the Committee, keep a record of all Committee
meetings, and provide administrative support and technical assistance
for the expertise in resource management and operations to facilitate
the Committee's work.
Committee Membership. In accordance with the Negotiated Rulemaking
Act, membership is limited to 25, with each member having an alternate.
The following membership is proposed for the Negotiated Rulemaking
Advisory Committee for Dog Management Regulation at Golden Gate
National Recreation Area:
1. The interests of the Department of the Interior will be
represented by:
National Park Service--Christine Powell
Alternate--Howard Levitt
2. The interests of organizations and visitors advocating off-leash
use will be represented by:
a. Crissy Field Dog Group--Martha Walters
Alternate--Chris Griffith
b. Fort Funston Dog Walkers--Linda McKay
Alternate--Karin Hu
c. Ocean Beach Dog Owners--John Keating
Alternate--Suzanne Valente
d. Pacifica Dog Walkers--Jeri Flinn
Alternate--Anne Farrow
e. Presidio Dog Walkers--Gary Fergus
Alternate--Carol Copsey
f. San Francisco Dog Owners Group--Keith McAllister
Alternate--Carol Arnold
3. The interests of commercial dog walking businesses will be
represented by:
ProDog--Joe Hague
Alternate--Donna Sproull
4. The interests of environmental organizations will be represented
by:
a. California Native Plant Society--Mark Heath
Alternate--Jake Sigg
b. Center for Biological Diversity--Brent Plater
Alternate--Jeff Miller
c. Golden Gate Audubon Society--Arthur Feinstein
Alternate--Elizabeth Murdock
d. Marine Mammal Center--Erin Brodie
Alternate--Joanne Mohr (Farallones Marine Sanctuary Association)
e. Sierra Club (Local Chapter)--Norman LaForce
Alternate--Gordon Bennett
f. San Francisco League of Conservation Voters--Stephen Krefting
Alternate--Michelle Jesperson
5. The interests of visitors user groups will be represented by:
a. Coleman Advocates for Youth--David Robinson
Alternate--Marybeth Wallace
b. Equestrian Groups--Judy Teichman (Marinwatch)
Alternate--Alice Caldwell-Steele (Miwok Valley Association)
c. Senior Action Network--Bruce Livingston
Alternate--Bob Planthold
d. Marin Humane Society--Cindy Machado
Alternate--Steve Hill
e. San Francisco SPCA--Daniel Crain
Alternate--Christine Rosenblatt
6. The interests of local governments will be represented by:
a. City of San Francisco--Dan McKenna
Alternate--Lemar Morrison
b. Former member of GGNRA Citizens Advisory Commission--Paul Jones
Alternate--Betsey Cutler
c. Presidio Trust--Joanne Marchetta
Alternate--Al Rosen
Application for Membership. Persons who believe that they will be
affected significantly by proposals to revise dog management at Golden
Gate National Recreation Area and who believe that such interests will
not be represented adequately by any person identified in the
``Committee Membership'' section above may apply for or nominate
another person for membership on the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
In order to be considered, each application or nomination must include:
1. The name of the applicant or nominee and a description of the
interest(s) such person is to represent;
2. Evidence that the applicant or nominee is authorized to
represent parties related to the interest(s) the person is proposed to
represent;
3. A written statement that the applicant or nominee will actively
participate in good faith in the development of the proposed rule; and
4. The reasons that the proposed members of the committee
identified above do not represent the interests of the person
submitting the application or nomination.
To be considered, the application must be complete and received by
the close of business on July 28, 2005 at the location indicated in the
``Address'' section above. Full consideration will be given to all
applications and nominations timely submitted. The decision whether or
not to add a person to the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for
Dog Management at Golden Gate National Recreation Area will be based on
a determination by the NPS whether an interest of that person will be
affected significantly by the proposed rule; whether an interest of
that person will be affected significantly by the proposed rule;
whether that interest is already represented adequately on the
Committee, and if not represented adequately, whether the applicant or
nominee would represent it adequately.
Certification: I hereby certify that the administrative
establishment of the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee for Dog
Management at Golden Gate National Recreation Area is necessary and in
the public interest in connection with the performance of duties
imposed on the Department of the Interior by the Act of August 25,
1916, 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and other statues relating to the
administration of the National Park System.
Dated: June 17, 2005.
Gale A. Norton,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 05-12751 Filed 6-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M