Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued, 37148 [05-12724]

Download as PDF 37148 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices Population Within the DNL Contours’’, Table 16 ‘‘2009 DNL Contour Area’’, and Table 17 ‘‘2009 Population Within the DNL Contours’’. The FAA has determined that these noise exposure maps and accompanying documentation are in compliance with applicable requirements. This determination is effective on June 22, 2005. FAA’s determination on the airport operator’s noise exposure maps is limited to a finding that the maps were developed in accordance with the procedures contained in appendix A of FAR part 150. Such determination does not constitute approval of the applicant’s data, information or plans, or a commitment to approve a noise compatibility program or to fund the implementation of that program. If questions arise concerning the precise relationship of specific properties to noise exposure contours depicted on a noise exposure map submitted under section 47503 of the Act, it should be noted that the FAA is not involved in any way in determining the relative locations of specific properties with regard to the depicted noise contours, or in interpreting the noise exposure maps to resolve questions concerning, for example, which properties should be covered by the provisions of section 47506 of the Act.These functions are inseparable from the ultimate land use control and planning responsibilities of local government. These local responsibilities are not changed in any way under part 150 or through FAA’s review of noise exposure maps. Therefore, the responsibility for the detailed overlaying of noise exposure contours onto the map depicting properties on the surface rests exclusively with the airport operator that submitted those maps, or with those public agencies and planning agencies with which consultation is required under section 47503 of the Act. The FAA has relied on the certification by the airport operator, under section 150.21 of FAR part 150, that the statutorily required consultation has been accomplished. Copies of the full noise exposure maps documentation and of the FAA’s evaluation of the maps are available for examination at the following locations: Federal Aviation Administration, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Dr., Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32822; Sanford Airport Authority, 1200 Red Cleveland Boulevard, Sanford,Florida 32773. Questions may be directed to the individual named above under the heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:46 Jun 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 Issued in Orlando, Florida, June 22, 2005. W. Dean Stringer, Manager, Orlando Airports District Office. [FR Doc. 05–12718 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Summary Notice No. PE–2005–33] Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Intent To Rule on Application 05–12–C–00–MKE To Impose a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at General Mitchell International Airport and To Use the Revenue at General Mitchell International Airport and Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, Milwaukee, WI Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on application. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application to impose a PFC at General ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior Mitchell International Airport and to petition. use the revenue at General Mitchell International Airport and Lawrence J. SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking Timmerman Airport under the provisions of the 49 U.S.C. 40117 and provisions governing the application, Part 158 of the Federal Aviation processing, and disposition of petitions Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code DATES: Comments must be received on of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this or before July 28, 2005. notice contains the disposition of certain petitions previously received. ADDRESSES: Comments on this The purpose of this notice is to improve application may be mailed or delivered in triplicate to the FAA at he following the public’s awareness of, and address: Minneapolis Airports District participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication Office, 6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450. of this notice nor the inclusion or In addition, one copy of any omission of information in the summary comments submitted to the FAA must is intended to affect the legal status of be mailed or delivered to Mr. C. Barry any petition or its final disposition. Bateman, Airport Director of the General FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mitchell International Airport, Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174, Office of Milwaukee, WI at the following address: Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation 5300 S. Howell Ave., Milwaukee, Administration, 800 Independence Wisconsin 53207–6189. Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Air carriers and foreign air carriers may submit copies of written comments This notice is published pursuant to previously provided to the County of 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Milwaukee under section 158.23 of Part Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21, 158. 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anthony F. Fazio, Sandra E. DePottey, Program Manager, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Minneapolis Airports District Office, 6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102, Disposition of Petitions Minneapolis, MN 55450, 612–713–4363. The application may be reviewed in Docket No.: FAA–2005–20679. person at this same location. Petitioner: Dassault Aviation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR proposes to rule and invites public 91.613(b) and 135.170(c). comment on the application to impose Description of Relief Sought/ a PFC at General Mitchell International Disposition: Relief from the Airport and to use the revenue at requirements for material in General Mitchell International Airport compartment interiors for Falcon and Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport under the provisions of the 49 U.S.C. F900EX, F2000EX, F2000, and F50EX 40117 and Part 158 of the Federal series airplanes. Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). Denial of Exemption, 06/20/2005, On June 20, 2005 the FAA determined Exemption No. 8569 that the application to impose and use [FR Doc. 05–12724 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am] the revenue from a PFC submitted by County of Milwaukee was substantially BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 37148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2005-33]


Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains the disposition of certain petitions previously received. The 
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and 
participation in, this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither 
publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information 
in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition 
or its final disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Linsenmeyer (202) 267-5174, 
Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21, 2005.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Disposition of Petitions

    Docket No.: FAA-2005-20679.
    Petitioner: Dassault Aviation.
    Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.613(b) and 135.170(c).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: Relief from the 
requirements for material in compartment interiors for Falcon F900EX, 
F2000EX, F2000, and F50EX series airplanes.
    Denial of Exemption, 06/20/2005, Exemption No. 8569

[FR Doc. 05-12724 Filed 6-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.