Notice of Effective Date, 37146-37147 [05-12586]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
37146
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices
Send comments to: United
States Sentencing Commission, One
Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 2–500,
South Lobby, Washington, DC 20002–
8002, Attention: Public Affairs-Priorities
Comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, telephone: (202) 502–4590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial
branch of the United States
Government. The Commission
promulgates sentencing guidelines and
policy statements for federal sentencing
courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews
and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o)
and submits guideline amendments to
the Congress not later than the first day
of May each year pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
994(p).
While the Commission provides this
notice to identify tentative priorities, it
recognizes that other factors, most
notably changes that may be required as
a result of United States v. Booker, 543
U.S.ll (2005); 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), as
well as the enactment of any legislation
requiring Commission action, may affect
the Commission’s ability to complete
work on any or all policy issues by the
statutory deadline of May 1, 2006.
For the amendment cycle ending May
1, 2006, and possibly continuing into
the amendment cycle ending May 1,
2007, the Commission has identified the
following tentative priorities:
(1) Implementation of crime
legislation enacted during the 108th
Congress and the first session of the
109th Congress warranting a
Commission response, including (A) the
Family Entertainment and Copyright
Act of 2005, Public Law 109–9; (B) the
Intellectual Property Protection and
Courts Amendment Act of 2004, Public
Law 108–482; (C) the Anabolic Steroids
Act, Public Law 108–358; (D) the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Reform Act of 2004, Public Law 108–
458; and (E) other legislation,
authorizing statutory penalties and
creating new offenses, that requires
incorporation into the guidelines;
(2) Continuation of its work with the
congressional, executive, and judicial
branches of the government and other
interested parties on appropriate
responses to United States v. Booker,
including any appropriate guideline
changes;
(3) Continuation of its policy work
regarding immigration offenses,
specifically, offenses under §§ 2L1.1
(Smuggling, Transporting, or Harboring
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
an Unlawful Alien) and 2L1.2
(Unlawfully Entering or Remaining in
the United States), and Chapter Two,
Part L, Subpart 2 (Naturalization and
Passports), which also may involve the
formation of an ad hoc advisory group
on immigration offenses;
(4) Continuation of its work with the
congressional, executive, and judicial
branches of the government and other
interested parties on cocaine sentencing
policy, including the update of
Commission research, in view of the
Commission’s 2002 report to Congress,
Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy;
(5) Review, and possible amendment,
of commentary in Chapter Eight
(Organizations) regarding waiver of the
attorney-client privilege and work
product protections;
(6) Resolution of a number of circuit
conflicts, pursuant to the Commission’s
continuing authority and responsibility,
under 28 U.S.C. § 991(b)(1)(B) and
Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344
(1991), to resolve conflicting
interpretations of the guidelines by the
federal courts; and
(7) Review and amendment of
pertinent guideline provisions to
address structural issues regarding the
Sentencing Table in Chapter Five, Part
A, particularly ‘‘cliff-like’’ effects
occurring between levels 42 and 43, and
a possible adjustment to the offense
level computation in cases in which the
offense level exceeds level 43.
The Commission hereby gives notice
that it is seeking comment on these
tentative priorities and on any other
issues that interested persons believe
the Commission should address during
the amendment cycle ending May 1,
2006, including short- and long-term
research issues. To the extent
practicable, comments submitted on
such issues should include the
following: (1) A statement of the issue,
including scope and manner of study,
particular problem areas and possible
solutions, and any other matters
relevant to a proposed priority; (2)
citations to applicable sentencing
guidelines, statutes, case law, and
constitutional provisions; and (3) a
direct and concise statement of why the
Commission should make the issue a
priority.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o); USSC
Rules of Practice and Procedure 5.2.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 05–12742 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–40–P
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Notice of Effective Date
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of effective date for
goods of Mexico for certain
modifications of the NAFTA Rules of
Origin.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In Proclamation 7870 of
February 9, 2005, the President
modified the rules of origin under the
North American Free Trade Agreement
(the ‘‘NAFTA’’) incorporated in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (the ‘‘HTS’’). The
modifications were made effective with
respect to goods of Canada that are
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse
for consumption, on or after January 1,
2005. The proclamation stated that the
modifications with respect to goods of
Mexico would be effective on or after a
date to be announced in the Federal
Register by the USTR. The purpose of
this notice is to announce that the
effective date for the modifications for
goods of Mexico is June 15, 2005. The
changes were printed in the Federal
Register of February 14, 2005, Volume
70, Number 29, pages 7611–7630.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, please contact Kent
Shigetomi, USTR, (202) 395–3412, or
kent_shigetomi@ustr.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Presidential Proclamation 6641 of
December 15, 1993 implemented the
North American Free Trade Agreement
(the ‘‘NAFTA’’) with respect to the
United States and, pursuant to the North
American Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (the ‘‘NAFTA
Implementation Act’’), incorporated in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (the ‘‘HTS’’) the tariff
modifications and rules of origin
necessary or appropriate to carry out the
NAFTA. Section 202 of the NAFTA
Implementation Act provides rules for
determining whether goods imported
into the United States originate in the
territory of a NAFTA party and thus are
eligible for the tariff and other treatment
contemplated under the NAFTA.
Section 202(q) of the NAFTA
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3332(q))
authorizes the President to proclaim, as
a part of the HTS, the rules of origin set
out in the NAFTA and to proclaim
modifications to such previously
proclaimed rules of origin, subject to the
consultation and layover requirements
of section 103(a) of the NAFTA
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3313(a)).
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices
The President determined that the
modifications to the HTS contained in
Proclamation 7870 and made pursuant
to sections 201 and 202 of the NAFTA
Implementation Act, were appropriate
and proclaimed such changes with
respect to goods of Canada on February
9, 2005. The modifications were made
effective with respect to goods of
Canada that are entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse for consumption, on or
after January 1, 2005. For goods of
Mexico, the President decided that the
effective date of the modifications shall
be determined by the United States
Trade Representative (USTR).
On May 3, 2005, the government of
Mexico obtained the necessary
authorization to implement the rule of
origin changes with respect to
qualifying goods entering from the
United States. Subsequently, officials
from the government of Mexico and the
government of the United States agreed
to implement these changes with
respect to each other’s eligible goods,
effective June 15, 2005.
Ambassador Rob Portman,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 05–12586 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W5–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5345–53C,
Airport Lighting Equipment
Certification Program; Proposed
Update and Opportunity To Comment
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), US DOT.
ACTION: Notice of update of AC150/
5345–53B to AC150/5345–53C.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to replace
AC150/5345–53B to AC150/5345–53C
to clarify the criteria under the Airport
Lighting Equipment Certification
Program (ALECP) for acceptance of an
organization as a third party
certification body (third party certifier)
and how manufactures may get
equipment qualified under the program.
The Secretary of Transportation is
providing notice in the Federal Register
of, and an opportunity for public
comment on, AC150/535–43C, Airport
Lighting Equipment Certification
Program.
Comments must be submitted on
or before August 12, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be delivered
or mailed to the FAA, Airport
Engineering Division, AAS–100, Room
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
619, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rick Marinelli, Manager, Airport
Engineering Division, AAS–100, Room
619, FAA, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Telephone
(202) 267–7669.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Existing
Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5345–53B,
Airport Lighting Equipment
Certification Program, describes the
Airport Lighting Equipment
Certification Program (ALECP). It
provides information on how an
organization can get Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) acceptance as a
third party certification body (third
party certifier) and how manufacturers
may get equipment qualified under the
program. The FAA proposes to replace
AC150/5345–53B with AC150/5345–
53C to clarify the criteria under the
Airport Lighting Equipment
Certification Program (ALECP) for
acceptance of an organization as a third
party certification body (third party
certifier) and how manufacturers may
get equipment qualified under the
program. The draft document is
available on the Internet. At the same
Internet site is a letter to manufacturer
relating to the Airport Lighting
Equipment Certification Program, dated
May 31, 2005. The Office of Airport
Safety and Standards may revise the
final AC as a result of comments
received and further review.
Both the draft AC150/5345–53C and
the May 31, 2005, letter to
manufacturers may be obtained from the
FAA Airports Internet site at https://
www.faa.gov/arp/publications/acs/
draftacs.cfm.
For any further information please
contact Mr. Rick Marinelli, Manager,
Airport Engineering Division, at (202)
267–7669.
Issued in Washington, DC on June 21,
2005.
David L. Bennett,
Director of Airport Safety and Standards.
[FR Doc. 05–12723 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Noise Exposure Map Notice; Orlando
Sanford International Airport, Sanford,
FL
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37147
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
determination that the noise exposure
maps submitted by Sanford Airport
Authority for Orlando Sanford
International Airport under the
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et. seq
(Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement
Act) and 14 CFR part 150 are in
compliance with applicable
requirements.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of the FAA’s determination on the noise
exposure maps is June 22, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Bonnie Baskin, Federal Aviation
Administration, Orlando Airports
District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National
Dr., Suite 400, Orlando Florida 32822,
(407) 812–6331, Extension 130.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces that the FAA finds
that the noise exposure maps submitted
for Orlando Sanford International
Airport are in compliance with
applicable requirements of Part 150,
effective June 22, 2005. Under 49 U.S.C.
47503 of the Aviation Safety and Noise
Abatement Act (hereinafter referred to
as ‘‘the Act’’), an airport operator may
submit to the FAA noise exposure maps
which meet applicable regulations and
which depict non-compatible land uses
as of the date of submission of such
maps, a description of projected aircraft
operations, and the ways in which such
operations will affect such maps. The
Act requires such maps to be developed
in consultation with interested and
affected parties in the local community,
government agencies, and persons using
the airport. An airport operator who has
submitted noise exposure maps that are
found by FAA to be in compliance with
the requirements of Federal Aviation
Regulations (FAR) part 150,
promulgated pursuant to the Act, may
submit a noise compatibility program
for FAA approval which sets forth the
measures the operator has taken or
proposes to take to reduct existing noncompatible uses and prevent the
introduction of additional noncompatible uses.
The FAA has completed its review of
the noise exposure maps and
accompanying documentation
submitted by Sanford Airport Authority.
The documentation that constitutes the
‘‘noise exposure maps’’ as defined in
section 150.7 of part 150 includes:
Exhibit 1 ‘‘Aircraft Flight TracksProposed IFR Flight Tracks-Runway 9R–
27L’’, Exhibit 2 ‘‘Existing Land Use’’,
Exhibit 3 ‘‘2004 DNL Contours’’, Exhibit
4 ‘‘2009 DNL Contours’’, Exhibit 5
‘‘Future Land Use’’, Table 14 ‘‘2004
DNL Contour Area’’, Table 15 ‘‘2004
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37146-37147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12586]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Notice of Effective Date
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of effective date for goods of Mexico for certain
modifications of the NAFTA Rules of Origin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In Proclamation 7870 of February 9, 2005, the President
modified the rules of origin under the North American Free Trade
Agreement (the ``NAFTA'') incorporated in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (the ``HTS''). The modifications were
made effective with respect to goods of Canada that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after January 1, 2005.
The proclamation stated that the modifications with respect to goods of
Mexico would be effective on or after a date to be announced in the
Federal Register by the USTR. The purpose of this notice is to announce
that the effective date for the modifications for goods of Mexico is
June 15, 2005. The changes were printed in the Federal Register of
February 14, 2005, Volume 70, Number 29, pages 7611-7630.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please
contact Kent Shigetomi, USTR, (202) 395-3412, or kent_
shigetomi@ustr.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Presidential Proclamation 6641 of December
15, 1993 implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (the
``NAFTA'') with respect to the United States and, pursuant to the North
American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the ``NAFTA
Implementation Act''), incorporated in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (the ``HTS'') the tariff modifications and rules
of origin necessary or appropriate to carry out the NAFTA. Section 202
of the NAFTA Implementation Act provides rules for determining whether
goods imported into the United States originate in the territory of a
NAFTA party and thus are eligible for the tariff and other treatment
contemplated under the NAFTA. Section 202(q) of the NAFTA
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3332(q)) authorizes the President to
proclaim, as a part of the HTS, the rules of origin set out in the
NAFTA and to proclaim modifications to such previously proclaimed rules
of origin, subject to the consultation and layover requirements of
section 103(a) of the NAFTA Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3313(a)).
[[Page 37147]]
The President determined that the modifications to the HTS
contained in Proclamation 7870 and made pursuant to sections 201 and
202 of the NAFTA Implementation Act, were appropriate and proclaimed
such changes with respect to goods of Canada on February 9, 2005. The
modifications were made effective with respect to goods of Canada that
are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after
January 1, 2005. For goods of Mexico, the President decided that the
effective date of the modifications shall be determined by the United
States Trade Representative (USTR).
On May 3, 2005, the government of Mexico obtained the necessary
authorization to implement the rule of origin changes with respect to
qualifying goods entering from the United States. Subsequently,
officials from the government of Mexico and the government of the
United States agreed to implement these changes with respect to each
other's eligible goods, effective June 15, 2005.
Ambassador Rob Portman,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 05-12586 Filed 6-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W5-P
