Special Local Regulations, Strait Thunder Performance, Port Angeles, WA, 36899-36901 [05-12648]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
BILLING CODE 6717–01–C
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Request for Comments
[CGD13–05–009]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations, Strait
Thunder Performance, Port Angeles,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing permanent special local
regulations for the Strait Thunder Race
held on the waters of Port Angeles
Harbor, Port Angeles, Washington.
These special local regulations limit the
movement of non-participating vessels
in the regulated race area and provide
for a viewing area for spectator craft.
This proposed rule is needed to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Sector
Commander, Sector Seattle, 1519
Alaskan Way South, Seattle,
Washington 98134. Sector Seattle
maintains the public docket [CGD13–
05–009] for this rulemaking. Comments
and material received from the public,
as well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:09 Jun 24, 2005
and will be available for inspection or
copying at Sector Seattle between 8 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG J. L. Hagen, c/o Captain of the Port
Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South,
Seattle, WA 98134, (206) 217–6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 205001
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD13–05–009),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 8 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Sector
Seattle at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
These hydroplane races pose several
dangers to the public including
excessive noise, objects falling from any
accidents, and hydroplanes racing at
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
high speeds in close proximity to other
vessels. Accordingly, regulatory action
is needed in order to provide for the
safety of spectators and participants
during the event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule will create two regulated
areas, a race area and a spectator area.
These regulated areas will assist in
minimizing the inherent dangers
associated with hydroplane races. These
dangers include, but are not limited to,
excessive noise, race craft traveling at
high speed in close proximity to one
another and to spectator craft, and the
risk of airborne objects from any
accidents associated with hydroplanes.
In the event that hydroplanes require
emergency assistance, rescuers must
have immediate and unencumbered
access to the craft. The Coast Guard,
through this action, intends to promote
the safety of personnel, vessels, and
facilities in the area. Due to these
concerns, public safety requires these
regulations to provide for the safety of
life on the navigable waters. This
proposed rule is substantially identical
to a temporary final rule that was
established for the 2004 Strait Thunder
race and published in the Federal
Register on September 30, 2004
(CGD13–04–039, 69 FR 58053).
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
EP27jn05.018
[FR Doc. 05–12626 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
36899
36900
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. This expectation is
based on the fact the regulated area
established by the proposed rule would
encompass an area near Port Angeles
Harbor, not frequented by commercial
navigation. The regulation is established
for the benefit and safety of the
recreational boating public, and any
negative recreational boating impact is
offset by the benefits of allowing the
hydroplanes to race. In addition, this
proposed rule would only be enforced
during a three day period. Specifically,
this proposed rule would be enforced
annually during the first or second
Friday, Saturday, and Sunday in
October from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific
daylight time. For the above reasons, the
Coast Guard does not anticipate any
significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Coast Guard
considered whether this proposed rule
would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’
comprises small businesses, not-forprofit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and
are not dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This
rule will affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities:
The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit this portion of Port
Angeles Harbor during the time this
regulation is in effect. The zone will not
have a significant economic impact due
to its short duration and small area. The
only vessels likely to be impacted will
be recreational boaters and small
passenger vessel operators. The event is
held for the benefit and entertainment of
those above categories. Because the
impacts of this proposal are expected to
be so minimal, the Coast Guard certifies
under 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:09 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) section.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13132 and have
determined this rule does not have
implications for federalism under that
Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded there are no factors in
this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine Safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend part 100 of Title 33, Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 100—MARINE EVENTS
[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. § 100.1307 is added to read as
follows:
§ 100.1307 Special Local Regulations,
Strait Thunder Performance, Port Angeles,
WA.
(a) Regulated Areas. (1) The race area
encompasses all waters located inside of
a line connecting the following points
located near Port Angeles, Washington:
Point 1: 48°07′24″ N, 123°25′32″ W;
Point 2: 48°07′26″ N, 123°24′35″ W;
Point 3: 48°07′12″ N, 123°25′31″ W;
Point 4: 48°07′15″ N, 123°24′34″ W.
[Datum: NAD 1983].
(2) The spectator area encompasses
all waters located within a box bounded
by the following points located near
Port Angeles, Washington:
Point 1: 48°07′32″ N, 123°25′33″ W;
Point 2: 48°07′29″ N, 123°24′36″ W;
Point 3: 48°07′24″ N, 123°25′32″ W;
Point 4: 48°07′26″ N, 123°24′35″ W.
[Datum: NAD 1983.]
(b) Definitions. For the purpose of this
section the following definitions apply:
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander
means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has
been designated by Commander, Coast
Guard Group Port Angeles. The Coast
Guard Patrol Commander is empowered
to control the movement of vessels in
the regulated area.
(2) Patrol Vessel means any Coast
Guard vessel, Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel, or other Federal, State or local
law enforcement vessel.
(c) Special Local Regulations. (1) Nonparticipant vessels are prohibited from
entering the race area unless authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
(2) Spectator craft may remain in the
designated spectator area but must
follow the directions of the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander. Spectator craft
entering, exiting or moving within the
spectator area must operate at speeds,
which will create a minimum wake, and
not exceed seven knots. The maximum
speed may be reduced at the discretion
of the Patrol Commander.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:09 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
(3) A succession of sharp, short
signals by whistle or horn from a Patrol
Vessel will serve as a signal to stop.
Vessels signaled must stop and comply
with the orders of the Patrol Vessel.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
(4) The Coast Guard Patrol
Commander may be assisted by other
federal, state and local law enforcement
agencies in enforcing this regulation.
(d) Enforcement dates. This section is
enforced annually on the first or second
Friday, Saturday, and Sunday in
October from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. The
event is a three day event and the
specific dates will be published each
year in the Federal Register. In 2005,
this section will be enforced from 9 a.m.
until 5 p.m. on Friday, September 30th,
to Sunday, October 2nd.
Dated: June 13, 2005.
J.M. Garrett,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–12648 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R05–OAR–2005–OH–0002; FRL–7928–2]
Approval and Disapproval of Ohio
Implementation Plan for Particulate
Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing action on
various particulate matter rule revisions
that Ohio submitted on June 4, 2003.
EPA is proposing to approve numerous
minor provisions that clarify a variety of
elements of these rules. However, EPA
is proposing to disapprove revisions
that provide for use of continuous
opacity monitoring data but allow more
exceedances of the general opacity limit
in cases where an eligible large coal
fired boiler opts to use these data for
determining compliance. EPA proposes
to find that these revisions constitute a
relaxation of the opacity rules, and that,
contrary to section 110(l) of the Clean
Air Act, these revisions may interfere
with satisfaction of relevant state
planning requirements.
DATES: Comments shall be received by
July 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005–
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36901
OH–0002, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comments
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
Fax: (312) 886–5824.
Mail: You may send written
comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Hand delivery: Deliver your
comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005-OH–0002.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME website and
the federal regulations.gov website are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 122 (Monday, June 27, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36899-36901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12648]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD13-05-009]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations, Strait Thunder Performance, Port
Angeles, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing permanent special local
regulations for the Strait Thunder Race held on the waters of Port
Angeles Harbor, Port Angeles, Washington. These special local
regulations limit the movement of non-participating vessels in the
regulated race area and provide for a viewing area for spectator craft.
This proposed rule is needed to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before August 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Sector
Commander, Sector Seattle, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, Washington
98134. Sector Seattle maintains the public docket [CGD13-05-009] for
this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as
well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at Sector Seattle between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG J. L. Hagen, c/o Captain of the
Port Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134, (206) 217-
6232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD13-05-
009), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8 by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know they
reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Sector Seattle at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
These hydroplane races pose several dangers to the public including
excessive noise, objects falling from any accidents, and hydroplanes
racing at high speeds in close proximity to other vessels. Accordingly,
regulatory action is needed in order to provide for the safety of
spectators and participants during the event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule will create two regulated areas, a race area and a
spectator area. These regulated areas will assist in minimizing the
inherent dangers associated with hydroplane races. These dangers
include, but are not limited to, excessive noise, race craft traveling
at high speed in close proximity to one another and to spectator craft,
and the risk of airborne objects from any accidents associated with
hydroplanes. In the event that hydroplanes require emergency
assistance, rescuers must have immediate and unencumbered access to the
craft. The Coast Guard, through this action, intends to promote the
safety of personnel, vessels, and facilities in the area. Due to these
concerns, public safety requires these regulations to provide for the
safety of life on the navigable waters. This proposed rule is
substantially identical to a temporary final rule that was established
for the 2004 Strait Thunder race and published in the Federal Register
on September 30, 2004 (CGD13-04-039, 69 FR 58053).
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
[[Page 36900]]
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This expectation is based on the
fact the regulated area established by the proposed rule would
encompass an area near Port Angeles Harbor, not frequented by
commercial navigation. The regulation is established for the benefit
and safety of the recreational boating public, and any negative
recreational boating impact is offset by the benefits of allowing the
hydroplanes to race. In addition, this proposed rule would only be
enforced during a three day period. Specifically, this proposed rule
would be enforced annually during the first or second Friday, Saturday,
and Sunday in October from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific daylight time. For
the above reasons, the Coast Guard does not anticipate any significant
economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Coast
Guard considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term
``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators
of vessels intending to transit this portion of Port Angeles Harbor
during the time this regulation is in effect. The zone will not have a
significant economic impact due to its short duration and small area.
The only vessels likely to be impacted will be recreational boaters and
small passenger vessel operators. The event is held for the benefit and
entertainment of those above categories. Because the impacts of this
proposal are expected to be so minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under
605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the (FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) section.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13132 and
have determined this rule does not have implications for federalism
under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not
concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
concluded there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
[[Page 36901]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend part 100 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 100--MARINE EVENTS [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Sec. 100.1307 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 100.1307 Special Local Regulations, Strait Thunder Performance,
Port Angeles, WA.
(a) Regulated Areas. (1) The race area encompasses all waters
located inside of a line connecting the following points located near
Port Angeles, Washington:
Point 1: 48[deg]07'24'' N, 123[deg]25'32'' W;
Point 2: 48[deg]07'26'' N, 123[deg]24'35'' W;
Point 3: 48[deg]07'12'' N, 123[deg]25'31'' W;
Point 4: 48[deg]07'15'' N, 123[deg]24'34'' W.
[Datum: NAD 1983].
(2) The spectator area encompasses all waters located within a box
bounded by the following points located near Port Angeles, Washington:
Point 1: 48[deg]07'32'' N, 123[deg]25'33'' W;
Point 2: 48[deg]07'29'' N, 123[deg]24'36'' W;
Point 3: 48[deg]07'24'' N, 123[deg]25'32'' W;
Point 4: 48[deg]07'26'' N, 123[deg]24'35'' W.
[Datum: NAD 1983.]
(b) Definitions. For the purpose of this section the following
definitions apply:
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by Commander,
Coast Guard Group Port Angeles. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander is
empowered to control the movement of vessels in the regulated area.
(2) Patrol Vessel means any Coast Guard vessel, Coast Guard
Auxiliary vessel, or other Federal, State or local law enforcement
vessel.
(c) Special Local Regulations. (1) Non-participant vessels are
prohibited from entering the race area unless authorized by the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander.
(2) Spectator craft may remain in the designated spectator area but
must follow the directions of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
Spectator craft entering, exiting or moving within the spectator area
must operate at speeds, which will create a minimum wake, and not
exceed seven knots. The maximum speed may be reduced at the discretion
of the Patrol Commander.
(3) A succession of sharp, short signals by whistle or horn from a
Patrol Vessel will serve as a signal to stop. Vessels signaled must
stop and comply with the orders of the Patrol Vessel. Failure to do so
may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply,
or both.
(4) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may be assisted by other
federal, state and local law enforcement agencies in enforcing this
regulation.
(d) Enforcement dates. This section is enforced annually on the
first or second Friday, Saturday, and Sunday in October from 9 a.m.
until 5 p.m. The event is a three day event and the specific dates will
be published each year in the Federal Register. In 2005, this section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on Friday, September 30th, to
Sunday, October 2nd.
Dated: June 13, 2005.
J.M. Garrett,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 05-12648 Filed 6-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P