Almonds Grown in California; Revision to Requirements Regarding Credit for Promotion and Advertising, 36816-36819 [05-12623]
Download as PDF
36816
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this rule, including alternative
expenditure levels, but determined that
the recommended expenses were
reasonable and necessary to adequately
cover program operations. Lower
assessment rates were considered, but
not recommended because they would
not generate the income necessary to
administer the program.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming crop year indicates that
the producer price for the 2005–2006
season could range between $5.05 and
$7.75 per hundredweight. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2005–2006 fiscal period as a percentage
of total producer revenue could range
between 0.40 and 0.26 percent.
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Colorado
potato industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend and
participate in the Committee’s
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the May 12, 2005,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on the issues. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Colorado potato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ama.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2005–2006 fiscal
period begins on July 1, 2005, and the
order requires that the rate of
assessment apply to all assessable
Colorado potatoes handled during such
fiscal period; (2) this action decreases
the assessment rate for assessable
potatoes beginning with the 2005–2006
fiscal period; (3) handlers are aware of
this action which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years; and (4) this interim final rule
provides a 60-day comment period, and
all comments timely received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is amended as
follows:
I
PART 948—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN COLORADO
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part
948 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 948.215 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 948.215
Assessment rate.
On or after July 1, 2005, an
assessment rate of $0.02 per
hundredweight is established for
Colorado Area No. 3 potatoes.
Dated: June 20, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12619 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. FV05–981–1 IFR]
Almonds Grown in California; Revision
to Requirements Regarding Credit for
Promotion and Advertising
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule revises the
requirements regarding credit for
promotion and advertising activities
under the administrative rules and
regulations of the California almond
marketing order (order). The order
regulates the handling of almonds
grown in California and is administered
locally by the Almond Board of
California (Board). The order is funded
through the collection of assessments
from almond handlers. Under the order,
handlers may receive credit towards
their assessment obligation for certain
expenditures for marketing promotion
activities, including paid advertising.
This rule revises the requirements
regarding the activities for which
handlers may receive such credit. The
changes will expand the credit allowed
for certain promotional activities, and
help to clarify and simplify the current
regulations.
DATES: Effective August 1, 2005;
comments received by August 26, 2005
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938, E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen T. Pello, Senior Marketing
Specialist, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street,
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule revises the requirements
regarding credit for promotion and
advertising activities prescribed under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
the administrative rules and regulations
of the order. Under the order, handlers
may receive credit towards their
assessment obligation for certain
expenditures for marketing promotion
activities, including paid advertising.
This rule revises the requirements
regarding the activities for which
handlers may receive such credit. The
changes will expand the credit allowed
for certain promotional activities, and
help to clarify and simplify the current
regulations. This action was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a meeting on May 12, 2005.
The order provides authority for the
Board to incur expenses for
administering the order and to collect
assessments from handlers to cover
these expenses. Section 981.41(a)
provides authority for the Board to
conduct marketing promotion projects,
including projects involving paid
advertising. Section 981.41(c) allows the
Board to credit a handler’s assessment
obligation with all or a portion of his or
her direct expenditures for marketing
promotion, including paid advertising
that promotes the sale of almonds,
almond products, or their uses. Section
981.41(e) allows the Board to prescribe
rules and regulations regarding such
credit for market promotion, including
paid advertising activities. Those
regulations are prescribed in § 981.441.
The Board recommended the following
changes to those regulations.
Increasing Credit for Internet
Promotion Activities
Section 981.441(e)(4)(ii)(K) allows
handlers to receive credit against their
assessment obligation for the
development and use of Web site
activities on the Internet for advertising
and public relations purposes. The
allowable credit is currently limited to
$5,000 per year, and no credit is given
for costs regarding E-commerce (which
is equivalent to opening a store).
The Board recommended increasing
the credit allowed for Internet
promotional activities from $5,000 to
$20,000 per year, adding credit for Ecommerce (except for administration
costs), and clarifying that no credit
would be given to Intranet (inter-office
communication network). The Board
determined that administration costs
associated with E-commerce such as
online payments and processing fees do
not directly promote almonds and
should thus be excluded from
reimbursement under the program. This
action would expand the allowable
credit and activities concerning Web
sites and thus provide handlers more
flexibility. Section 981.441(e)(4)(ii)(K) is
revised accordingly.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36817
Clarification Regarding Final
Reimbursement Claims
In order for handlers to receive credit
against their assessment obligation for
their own promotional expenditures, the
Board must determine that such
expenditures meet applicable
requirements. Handlers must submit
claims with appropriate documentation
to the Board. Credit may be granted in
the form of a payment from the Board,
or as an offset to the Board’s assessment
if activities are conducted and
documented to the satisfaction of the
Board within certain time frames
throughout the crop year.
Section 981.441(e)(6)(iv) currently
requires handlers to submit a statement
of all outstanding credit-back
commitments in full to the Board as of
the close of the crop year (July 31)
within 15 days after the crop year ends
(August 15). Additionally, handlers
must submit final claims pertaining to
such outstanding commitments to the
Board within 76 days after the crop year
ends (October 15).
The Board recommended adding
language to this section to clarify that
final claims must be submitted ‘‘with all
required elements,’’ which includes
invoices, proof of payment, and similar
documentation. This will allow Board
staff to process the final claims for a
crop year and complete the necessary
accounting functions to close the books
for that crop year in a timely manner.
Other comparable deadlines throughout
the credit-back regulations contain this
language. This addition will help to
facilitate program administration.
Section 981.441(e)(6)(iv) is revised
accordingly.
Removal of Obsolete Language
Section 981.441 contains language
throughout the section that refers to the
1998–99 crop year only. The Board
recommended removing this language to
help clarify and simplify the regulation.
Section 981.441 is revised accordingly.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
36818
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 6,000
producers of almonds in the production
area and approximately 115 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,000,000.
Data for the most recently completed
crop year indicate that about 48 percent
of the handlers shipped over $6,000,000
worth of almonds and about 52 percent
of the handlers shipped under
$6,000,000 worth of almonds. In
addition, based on production and
grower price data reported by the
California Agricultural Statistics Service
(CASS), and the total number of almond
growers, the average annual grower
revenue is estimated to be
approximately $261,248. Based on the
foregoing, the majority of handlers and
producers of almonds may be classified
as small entities.
This rule revises the § 981.441 of the
order’s administrative rules and
regulations regarding credit-back
promotion and advertising. Under the
order, handlers may receive credit
towards their assessment expenditures
for marketing promotion activities,
including paid advertising. This rule
increases the credit allowed for Internet
promotion activities from $5,000 to
$20,000 per year, adds credit for Ecommerce (excluding administration),
and clarifies that final reimbursement
claims submitted to the Board by
handlers for a crop year must include all
applicable documentation.
Additionally, this rule removes obsolete
language from the regulations that was
applicable to the 1998–99 crop year.
Regarding the impact of this rule on
affected entities, it is estimated that, for
the 2003–04 crop year, about 18 percent
of the industry’s handlers participated
in the credit-back program administered
under the order. Increasing the credit
allowed for Internet promotion activities
and adding credit for E-commerce will
provide additional opportunities for
handlers. The changes to specify that
handlers must submit final claims with
all required elements will help to
facilitate program administration.
Finally, removing obsolete language will
clarify and simplify the regulations.
Regarding alternatives, the Board
formed a task force that met on January
26, March 1, and April 1, 2005, to
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
review the credit-back regulations. The
task force considered several changes to
the regulations, including whether
handlers should receive credit for travel
to trade shows, sponsorships, and
sweepstakes. The task force also
reviewed a handbook that Board staff
developed to facilitate administration of
the credit-back regulations. The task
force’s recommendations were reviewed
by the Board’s Public Relations and
Advertising Committee on May 11,
2005, and by the full Board on May 12,
2005. Ultimately, the Board decided that
the changes discussed herein are
warranted at this time.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California
almond handlers. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the information
collection requirements that are
contained in this rule have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget and assigned
OMB No. 0581–0178. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
Finally, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Additionally, the meetings were
widely publicized throughout the
California almond industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
deliberations on all issues. Like all task
force, committee and Board meetings,
those meetings held on January 26,
March 1, April 1, May 11, and May 12
were all public meetings and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on
changes to the credit-back regulations
under the California almond marketing
order. Any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This action needs to be in
effect by August 1, 2005, the start of the
2005–06 crop year; (2) handlers are
aware of this action which was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a public meeting; (3) this action
expands the opportunities for handlers
to receive credit towards their
assessment obligation for certain
promotional expenditures which they
conduct; and (4) this interim final rule
provides a 60-day comment period, and
all comments timely received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part
981 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 981.441 is amended by:
A. Revising the second sentence in
paragraph (a);
I B. Revising the first sentence in
paragraph (b);
I C. Revising paragraph (e)(4)(ii)(K);
I D. Revising the first sentence in
paragraph (e)(6)(ii);
I E. Revising the second sentence in
paragraph (e)(6)(iv); and
I F. Removing paragraph (e)(4)(v) to read
as follows:
I
I
§ 981.441 Credit for market promotion
activities, including paid advertising.
(a) * * * Credit will be granted either
in the form of a payment from the
Board, or as an offset to that portion of
the assessment if activities are
conducted and documented to the
satisfaction of the Board at least 2 weeks
prior to the Board’s first and second
assessment billings, and at least 3 weeks
prior to the Board’s third and fourth
assessment billings in a crop year.
* * *
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(b) The portion of the handler
assessment for which credit may be
received under this section will be
billed, and is due and payable, at the
same time as the portion of the handler
assessment used for the Board’s
administrative expenses, unless the
handler(s) conduct and document
activities at least 2 weeks prior to the
first and second assessment billings and
3 weeks prior to the third and fourth
assessment billings. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(K) Development and use of web-site
on the Internet for advertising and
public relations purposes, including Ecommerce (mail ordering through the
Internet): Provided, That Credit-Back
shall be limited to $20,000 per year for
such activities, and no credit shall be
given for costs for E-commerce
administration, Extranet (restricted Web
sites within the Internet), Intranet (interoffice communication network), or
portions of a web-site that target the
farming or grower trade.
(iii) * * *
(iv) * * *
(5) * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) Handlers may receive credit
against their assessment obligation up to
the advertising amount of the
assessment installment due: Provided,
That handlers submit the required
documentation for a qualified activity at
least 2 weeks prior to the mailing of the
Board’s first and second assessment
notices, and at least 3 weeks prior to the
mailing of the Board’s third and fourth
assessment notices in a crop year. * * *
(iii) * * *
(iv) * * * Final claims pertaining to
such commitments outstanding must be
submitted with all required elements
within 76 days after the close of that
crop year. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 20, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12623 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20079; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–147–AD; Amendment
39–14163; AD 2005–13–26]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes;
Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–
600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4–
605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively
Called A300–600 Series Airplanes);
and Model A310–200 and –300 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus models, as specified above. This
AD requires installing safety signs on all
passenger/crew doors, emergency exit
doors, and cargo compartment doors.
This AD is prompted by a report of
injuries occurring on in-service
airplanes when crewmembers forcibly
initiated opening of passenger/crew
doors against residual pressure causing
the doors to rapidly open. We are
issuing this AD to ensure that
crewmembers are informed of the risks
associated with forcibly opening
passenger/crew, emergency exit, and
cargo doors before an airplane is fully
depressurized, which will prevent
injury to crewmembers, and subsequent
damage to the airplane caused by the
rapid opening of the door.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 1, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the AD is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of August 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France.
Docket: The AD docket contains the
proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You can examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street SW., room PL–401,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36819
Washington, DC. This docket number is
FAA–2005–20079; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–
147–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2797;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with
an AD for certain Airbus Model A300
B2 and B4 series airplanes; Model A300
B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series
airplanes, and Model C4–605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called A300–600
series airplanes); and Model A310–200
and –300 series airplanes. That action,
published in the Federal Register on
January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2985), proposed
to require installing safety signs on all
passenger/crew doors, emergency exit
doors, and cargo compartment doors.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments that have
been submitted on the proposed AD.
Request To Revise Paragraph (h), Credit
for Previous Service Bulletins
One commenter notes that in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD,
Airbus Service Bulletin A310–11–2002
is incorrectly referred to as Service
Bulletin A300–11–2002. We infer that
the commenter is requesting that we
correct the typographical error. The
commenter also notes a difference
between the French airworthiness
directive and the proposed AD, which
could lead to requests for alternative
methods of compliance from operators.
The commenter points out that the
proposed AD specifies the use of
Service Bulletin A310–11–2002,
Revision 03, dated February 4, 2004,
and that actions accomplished before
the effective date of the AD, in
accordance with Revision 2, dated
January 27, 1995, are acceptable for
compliance with the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD. The
French airworthiness directive
references Service Bulletin A310–11–
2002, or any later approved revision.
The commenter recommends that the
original issue and Revision 1 of Service
Bulletin A310–11–2002 be included in
paragraph (h), ‘‘Credit for Previous
Service Bulletins,’’ of the proposed AD.
We agree with the commenter’s
requests and have revised paragraph (h)
of this AD to correct the typographical
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 122 (Monday, June 27, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36816-36819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12623]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. FV05-981-1 IFR]
Almonds Grown in California; Revision to Requirements Regarding
Credit for Promotion and Advertising
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the requirements regarding credit for
promotion and advertising activities under the administrative rules and
regulations of the California almond marketing order (order). The order
regulates the handling of almonds grown in California and is
administered locally by the Almond Board of California (Board). The
order is funded through the collection of assessments from almond
handlers. Under the order, handlers may receive credit towards their
assessment obligation for certain expenditures for marketing promotion
activities, including paid advertising. This rule revises the
requirements regarding the activities for which handlers may receive
such credit. The changes will expand the credit allowed for certain
promotional activities, and help to clarify and simplify the current
regulations.
DATES: Effective August 1, 2005; comments received by August 26, 2005
will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of
the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen T. Pello, Senior Marketing
Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street,
[[Page 36817]]
Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax:
(559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule revises the requirements regarding credit for promotion
and advertising activities prescribed under the administrative rules
and regulations of the order. Under the order, handlers may receive
credit towards their assessment obligation for certain expenditures for
marketing promotion activities, including paid advertising. This rule
revises the requirements regarding the activities for which handlers
may receive such credit. The changes will expand the credit allowed for
certain promotional activities, and help to clarify and simplify the
current regulations. This action was unanimously recommended by the
Board at a meeting on May 12, 2005.
The order provides authority for the Board to incur expenses for
administering the order and to collect assessments from handlers to
cover these expenses. Section 981.41(a) provides authority for the
Board to conduct marketing promotion projects, including projects
involving paid advertising. Section 981.41(c) allows the Board to
credit a handler's assessment obligation with all or a portion of his
or her direct expenditures for marketing promotion, including paid
advertising that promotes the sale of almonds, almond products, or
their uses. Section 981.41(e) allows the Board to prescribe rules and
regulations regarding such credit for market promotion, including paid
advertising activities. Those regulations are prescribed in Sec.
981.441. The Board recommended the following changes to those
regulations.
Increasing Credit for Internet Promotion Activities
Section 981.441(e)(4)(ii)(K) allows handlers to receive credit
against their assessment obligation for the development and use of Web
site activities on the Internet for advertising and public relations
purposes. The allowable credit is currently limited to $5,000 per year,
and no credit is given for costs regarding E-commerce (which is
equivalent to opening a store).
The Board recommended increasing the credit allowed for Internet
promotional activities from $5,000 to $20,000 per year, adding credit
for E-commerce (except for administration costs), and clarifying that
no credit would be given to Intranet (inter-office communication
network). The Board determined that administration costs associated
with E-commerce such as online payments and processing fees do not
directly promote almonds and should thus be excluded from reimbursement
under the program. This action would expand the allowable credit and
activities concerning Web sites and thus provide handlers more
flexibility. Section 981.441(e)(4)(ii)(K) is revised accordingly.
Clarification Regarding Final Reimbursement Claims
In order for handlers to receive credit against their assessment
obligation for their own promotional expenditures, the Board must
determine that such expenditures meet applicable requirements. Handlers
must submit claims with appropriate documentation to the Board. Credit
may be granted in the form of a payment from the Board, or as an offset
to the Board's assessment if activities are conducted and documented to
the satisfaction of the Board within certain time frames throughout the
crop year.
Section 981.441(e)(6)(iv) currently requires handlers to submit a
statement of all outstanding credit-back commitments in full to the
Board as of the close of the crop year (July 31) within 15 days after
the crop year ends (August 15). Additionally, handlers must submit
final claims pertaining to such outstanding commitments to the Board
within 76 days after the crop year ends (October 15).
The Board recommended adding language to this section to clarify
that final claims must be submitted ``with all required elements,''
which includes invoices, proof of payment, and similar documentation.
This will allow Board staff to process the final claims for a crop year
and complete the necessary accounting functions to close the books for
that crop year in a timely manner. Other comparable deadlines
throughout the credit-back regulations contain this language. This
addition will help to facilitate program administration. Section
981.441(e)(6)(iv) is revised accordingly.
Removal of Obsolete Language
Section 981.441 contains language throughout the section that
refers to the 1998-99 crop year only. The Board recommended removing
this language to help clarify and simplify the regulation. Section
981.441 is revised accordingly.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about
[[Page 36818]]
through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small entity orientation and
compatibility.
There are approximately 6,000 producers of almonds in the
production area and approximately 115 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$6,000,000.
Data for the most recently completed crop year indicate that about
48 percent of the handlers shipped over $6,000,000 worth of almonds and
about 52 percent of the handlers shipped under $6,000,000 worth of
almonds. In addition, based on production and grower price data
reported by the California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS), and
the total number of almond growers, the average annual grower revenue
is estimated to be approximately $261,248. Based on the foregoing, the
majority of handlers and producers of almonds may be classified as
small entities.
This rule revises the Sec. 981.441 of the order's administrative
rules and regulations regarding credit-back promotion and advertising.
Under the order, handlers may receive credit towards their assessment
expenditures for marketing promotion activities, including paid
advertising. This rule increases the credit allowed for Internet
promotion activities from $5,000 to $20,000 per year, adds credit for
E-commerce (excluding administration), and clarifies that final
reimbursement claims submitted to the Board by handlers for a crop year
must include all applicable documentation. Additionally, this rule
removes obsolete language from the regulations that was applicable to
the 1998-99 crop year.
Regarding the impact of this rule on affected entities, it is
estimated that, for the 2003-04 crop year, about 18 percent of the
industry's handlers participated in the credit-back program
administered under the order. Increasing the credit allowed for
Internet promotion activities and adding credit for E-commerce will
provide additional opportunities for handlers. The changes to specify
that handlers must submit final claims with all required elements will
help to facilitate program administration. Finally, removing obsolete
language will clarify and simplify the regulations.
Regarding alternatives, the Board formed a task force that met on
January 26, March 1, and April 1, 2005, to review the credit-back
regulations. The task force considered several changes to the
regulations, including whether handlers should receive credit for
travel to trade shows, sponsorships, and sweepstakes. The task force
also reviewed a handbook that Board staff developed to facilitate
administration of the credit-back regulations. The task force's
recommendations were reviewed by the Board's Public Relations and
Advertising Committee on May 11, 2005, and by the full Board on May 12,
2005. Ultimately, the Board decided that the changes discussed herein
are warranted at this time.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California almond handlers. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter
35), the information collection requirements that are contained in this
rule have been previously approved by the Office of Management and
Budget and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector
agencies. Finally, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Additionally, the meetings were widely publicized throughout the
California almond industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in deliberations on all issues.
Like all task force, committee and Board meetings, those meetings held
on January 26, March 1, April 1, May 11, and May 12 were all public
meetings and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the for further information contact section.
This rule invites comments on changes to the credit-back
regulations under the California almond marketing order. Any comments
received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect, and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register because: (1) This action needs to be in effect by August 1,
2005, the start of the 2005-06 crop year; (2) handlers are aware of
this action which was unanimously recommended by the Board at a public
meeting; (3) this action expands the opportunities for handlers to
receive credit towards their assessment obligation for certain
promotional expenditures which they conduct; and (4) this interim final
rule provides a 60-day comment period, and all comments timely received
will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 981.441 is amended by:
0
A. Revising the second sentence in paragraph (a);
0
B. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (b);
0
C. Revising paragraph (e)(4)(ii)(K);
0
D. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (e)(6)(ii);
0
E. Revising the second sentence in paragraph (e)(6)(iv); and
0
F. Removing paragraph (e)(4)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 981.441 Credit for market promotion activities, including paid
advertising.
(a) * * * Credit will be granted either in the form of a payment
from the Board, or as an offset to that portion of the assessment if
activities are conducted and documented to the satisfaction of the
Board at least 2 weeks prior to the Board's first and second assessment
billings, and at least 3 weeks prior to the Board's third and fourth
assessment billings in a crop year. * * *
[[Page 36819]]
(b) The portion of the handler assessment for which credit may be
received under this section will be billed, and is due and payable, at
the same time as the portion of the handler assessment used for the
Board's administrative expenses, unless the handler(s) conduct and
document activities at least 2 weeks prior to the first and second
assessment billings and 3 weeks prior to the third and fourth
assessment billings. * * *
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(K) Development and use of web-site on the Internet for advertising
and public relations purposes, including E-commerce (mail ordering
through the Internet): Provided, That Credit-Back shall be limited to
$20,000 per year for such activities, and no credit shall be given for
costs for E-commerce administration, Extranet (restricted Web sites
within the Internet), Intranet (inter-office communication network), or
portions of a web-site that target the farming or grower trade.
(iii) * * *
(iv) * * *
(5) * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) Handlers may receive credit against their assessment
obligation up to the advertising amount of the assessment installment
due: Provided, That handlers submit the required documentation for a
qualified activity at least 2 weeks prior to the mailing of the Board's
first and second assessment notices, and at least 3 weeks prior to the
mailing of the Board's third and fourth assessment notices in a crop
year. * * *
(iii) * * *
(iv) * * * Final claims pertaining to such commitments outstanding
must be submitted with all required elements within 76 days after the
close of that crop year. * * *
* * * * *
Dated: June 20, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12623 Filed 6-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P