Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Control of VOC Emissions From Aerospace, Mobile Equipment, and Wood Furniture Surface Coating Applications for Allegheny County, 36511-36515 [05-12581]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. A final ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a final
‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’
are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165, as follows:
PART 165 — REGULATED
NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED
ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. A new temporary § 165.T07–076 is
added to read as follows:
§ 165.T07–076
FL.
Safety Zone, Indian River,
(a) Regulated area. The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
around a fireworks barge on the Indian
River, New Smyrna, Florida. The safety
zone includes all waters within 500
yards in any direction from the
fireworks barge located at approximate
position 29°03′00″ N, 080°55′00″ W.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and federal, state,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Jacksonville, Florida, in the enforcement
of the regulated navigation areas and
security zones
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, anchoring, mooring or
transiting in this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Jacksonville, FL or
his designated representative.
(d) Dates. This rule is effective from
9 p.m. on June 25, 2005, until 10 p.m.
on June 25, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: June 14, 2005.
David L. Lersch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 05–12540 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03–OAR–2005–PA–0014; FRL–7927–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
Control of VOC Emissions From
Aerospace, Mobile Equipment, and
Wood Furniture Surface Coating
Applications for Allegheny County
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the
Allegheny County portion of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision, submitted by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP) on behalf of the Allegheny
County Health Department (ACHD),
establishes standards and requirements
to control volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) emissions from aerospace,
mobile equipment, and wood furniture
surface coating applications, and
modifies existing regulations for general
and specific coating processes. This
revision updates the ACHD’s regulations
to make them consistent with the
Commonwealth’s SIP-approved
regulations regarding the affected
surface coating processes. EPA is
approving this revision to the Allegheny
portion of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on August
23, 2005, without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
by July 25, 2005. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R03–OAR–
2005–PA–0014, by one of the following
methods:
A. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36511
B. Agency Web site: https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp
RME, EPA’s electronic public docket
and comment system, is EPA’s preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
C. E-mail: campbell.dave@epa.gov.
D. Mail: R03–OAR–2005–PA–0014,
David Campbell Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R03–OAR–2005–PA–0014.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through RME,
regulations.gov or e-mail. The EPA RME
and the Federal regulations.gov Web
sites are an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the RME
index at https://www.docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
36512
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Allegheny County
Health Department, Bureau of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air
Quality, 301 39th Street, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814–2034, or by
e-mail at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 18, 2004, the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on
behalf of Allegheny County, submitted a
formal revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision
modifies existing regulations under
ACHD’s Rules and Regulations, Article
XXI, sections 2101.20, 2105.01, and
2105.10 pertaining to surface coating
processes in general, and creates new
sections, 2105.74, 2105.75, and 2105.76
specific to the aerospace, automotive,
and wood furniture industries,
respectively. These new regulations are
applicable to all automotive touch-up
and repair facilities, certain aircraft
maintenance facilities, and wood
furniture manufacturing facilities that
meet or exceed specified emission
thresholds.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The March 18, 2004 revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP, submitted by PADEP
on behalf of Allegheny County, is based
on recent PADEP amendments, EPA
Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs),
and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS).
This revision updates Allegheny
County’s Article XXI Air Pollution
Control Regulations to make them
consistent with previously SIPapproved PADEP regulations. Listed
below is a summary of the SIP revision.
For more detailed information on this
revision, please see the technical
support document (TSD) prepared for
this rulemaking.
A. Part A—General, section 2101.20,
Definitions
This revision adds and revises
definitions in Article XXI, section
2101.20, Definitions, for terms that are
used in the substantive sections of
2105.74, Aerospace Manufacturing and
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Rework, 2105.75, Mobile Equipment
Repair and Refinishing, and 2105.76,
Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations.
B. Part E—Source Emission and
Operating Standards, section 2105.01,
Equivalent Compliance Techniques
This revision revises the VOC
equivalency provisions of section
2105.01, Equivalent Compliance
Techniques of the ACHD’s Article XXI
Air Pollution Control Regulations. The
revision authorizes compliance with
section 2105.01 by the use of an
alternative method if that method is
incorporated by the Department into an
applicable federally enforceable
installation permit or operating permit
subject to review by EPA. The revision
removes the requirement that alternative
compliance methods for certain VOC
requirements be submitted to EPA as a
SIP revision. This action will streamline
the process for establishing alternative
compliance methods. EPA is approving
this revision because any alternative
compliance method would be reviewed
by EPA as a part of the permitting
process to ensure that it produced
results equivalent to the method
specified in the regulations, thereby not
jeopardizing attainment of the ozone
standard.
C. Part E—Source Emission and
Operating Standards-Subpart 1, VOC
Sources, section 2105.10, Surface
Coating Processes
This revision to the ACHD’s Article
XXI, section 2105.10, Surface Coating
Processes, revises equations for
calculating VOC content, recalculates
emission limits on a ‘‘per solids’’ basis,
and modifies recordkeeping
requirements. This regulation applies to
a surface coating process category,
regardless of the size, which emits or
has emitted VOCs into the outdoor
atmosphere in quantities greater than 3
pounds (1.4 kilograms) per hour, 15
pounds (7 kilograms) per day, or 2.7
tons (2,455 kilograms) per year during
any calendar year since January 1, 1987.
A person may not cause or permit the
emission into the outdoor atmosphere of
VOCs from a surface coating process
category in the regulation, unless the
VOC content of each as applied coating
is equal to or less than the standard
specified in the regulation, or the
overall weight of VOCs emitted to the
atmosphere is reduced through the use
of vapor recovery or incineration or
another method which is acceptable
under section 2105.01, Equivalent
Compliance Techniques.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Part E—Source Emission and
Operating Standards, Subpart 7—
Miscellaneous Sources, section 2105.74,
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
This revision adds a new section,
2105.74 to ACHD’s Article XXI,
adopting requirements to control VOC
emissions from coatings and solvents
used in the aerospace industry. This
regulation updates ACHD’s Article XXI
Air Pollution Control regulations to
reflect existing PADEP aerospace
regulations, establishing emission limits
and reasonably available control
technology (RACT) for aerospace
sources that have the potential to emit
(PTE) 25 tons a year or more of VOCs.
The aerospace industry includes all
manufacturing facilities that produce an
aerospace vehicle or component and all
facilities that repair these aerospace
products. An aerospace vehicle or
component is defined as, but not limited
to, any fabricated part, processed part,
assembly of parts, or completed unit of
any aircraft including, but not limited to
airplanes, helicopters, missiles, rockets,
and space vehicles. In addition to
manufacturing and repair facilities,
some shops may specialize in providing
a service, such as chemical milling,
rather than actually producing a
component or assembly. Aerospace
coatings that meet the definitions of the
specific coatings of the regulation shall
meet those allowable VOC limits.
E. Part E—Source Emission and
Operating Standards, Subpart 7—
Miscellaneous Sources, section 2105.75,
Mobile Equipment Repair and
Refinishing
This revision adds a new section,
2105.75, to ACHD’s Article XXI Air
Pollution Control Regulations,
establishing allowable VOC-content
requirements for coatings used in
mobile equipment repair and
refinishing. This regulation updates
ACHD’s Article XXI Air Pollution
Control regulations to reflect existing
PADEP mobile equipment repair and
refinishing regulations. This regulation
establishes emission limits, equations
for calculating content, application
techniques, and housekeeping
requirements for non-assembly plant
mobile equipment repair and refinishing
sources. This regulation applies to a
person who applies mobile equipment
repair and refinishing or color-matched
coatings to mobile equipment or mobile
equipment components. This regulation
does not apply to a person who applies
surface coatings to mobile equipment or
mobile equipment components if the
surface coating process is subject to the
miscellaneous metal parts finishing
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of the ACHD’s Article XXI,
section 2105.10, Surface Coating
Processes, if the surface coating process
is at an automobile assembly plant, or
if the person applying the coatings does
not receive compensation for the
application of the coatings. A person
subject to this regulation may not apply
to mobile equipment or mobile
equipment components any automotive
pretreatment, automotive primersurfacer, automotive primer-sealer,
automotive topcoat, and automotive
specialty coatings, including any VOCcontaining materials added to the
original coating supplied by the
manufacturer, that contain VOCs in
excess of the limits specified in the
regulation.
F. Part E—Source Emission and
Operating Standards, Subpart 7—
Miscellaneous Sources, section 2105.76,
Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations
This revision adds a new section,
2105.74 to ACHD’s Article XXI,
adopting new VOC regulations for wood
furniture operations including wood
furniture finishing, cleaning, and washoff operations. This regulation
establishes emission limits and control
technology for sources that have a PTE
of 25 tons a year or more of VOCs from
wood furniture manufacturing
operations. In addition to setting VOC
emission limits, the new regulation
establishes work practice standards,
compliance procedures, monitoring
requirements, recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, and special
provisions for facilities using an
emissions averaging approach. The
limits in this regulation do not apply to
a coating used exclusively for
determining product quality and
commercial acceptance, touch-up and
repair, and other small quantity coatings
if the quantity of coating does not
exceed 50 gallons per year for a single
coating, and a total of 200 gallons per
year for all coatings combined for the
facility. The owner or operator of the
facility must submit a written request to
the Department which must be
approved prior to the use of the
coatings.
An owner or an operator of a facility
subject to this regulation shall limit
VOC emissions from wood furniture
manufacturing operations by: (1)
Applying either waterborne topcoats or
a combination of sealers and topcoats
and strippable spray booth coatings
with a VOC content equal to or less than
the standards specified in the
regulation; (2) using an emissions
averaging program which meets the
requirements of the emissions averaging
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:42 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
provisions of the regulation; (3) using a
control system that achieves a reduction
in emissions equivalent to 0.8 lb VOC/
lb solids for topcoats, or 1.8 lbs VOC/
lb solids for topcoats and 1.9 lbs VOC/
lb solids for sealers; and (4) using a
combination of the above methods.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving a revision to the
Allegheny County portion of the
Pennsylvania SIP consisting of
amendments to section 2101.20,
Definitions, section 2105.01, Equivalent
Compliance Techniques, and section
2105.10, Surface Coating Processes. In
addition, EPA is also approving the
addition to ACHD’s Article XXI of new
sections 2105.74, Aerospace
Manufacturing and Rework, section
2105.75, Mobile Equipment Repair and
Refinishing, and section 2105.76, Wood
Furniture Manufacturing Operations.
These revisions were submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on
behalf of Allegheny County on March
18, 2004, and update ACHD’s Article
XXI regulations to make them consistent
with existing PADEP regulations.
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of today’s Federal
Register, EPA is publishing a separate
document that will serve as the proposal
to approve the SIP revision if adverse
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective on August 23, 2005, without
further notice unless EPA receives
adverse comment by July 25, 2005. If
EPA receives adverse comment, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36513
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–4). This rule also does
not have tribal implications because it
will not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
36514
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by August 23, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule,
revising Allegheny County’s Article
XXI, VOC Control, General and Specific
Surface Coating Applications, does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action, may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Article XXI citation
*
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. In § 52.2020, the table in
paragraph(c)(2) is amended by revising
the title of the third column to read
‘‘State effective date’’; adding an entry
for Part A, 2101.20 after the existing
entry for 2101.20; adding entries for Part
E, 2105.74, 2105.75, and 2105.76; and
revising entries for Part E, 2105.01 and
2105.10 to read as follows:
I
§ 52.2020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
*
2105.10 .............
*
*
*
PART E Source Emission and Operating Standards
Equivalent Compliance Techniques .....................................................................
*
*
Subpart 1 VOC Sources
Surface Coating Processes ..................................................................................
*
*
2105.74 .............
*
Subpart 7
*
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Additional explanation/
§ 52.2063 citation
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
*
6/24/05
[Insert page
number
where the
document
begins]
*
7/10/03
*
6/24/05
[Insert page
number
where the
document
begins]
*
7/10/03
*
*
Miscellaneous VOC Sources
*
*
*
*
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework ................................................................
16:42 Jun 23, 2005
EPA approval date
7/10/03
*
*
*
General
*
*
*
*
Definitions .............................................................................................................
*
*
State effective date
*
2105.01 .............
VerDate jul<14>2003
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
I
Title/subject
PART A
*
2101.20 .............
Dated: June 15, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
*
6/24/05
[Insert page
number
where the
document
begins]
*
*
*
7/10/03
24JNR1
*
6/24/05
[Insert page
number
where the
document
begins]
36515
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Article XXI citation
Title/subject
State effective date
EPA approval date
2105.75 .............
Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing ...........................................................
7/10/03
2105.76 .............
Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations ..........................................................
7/10/03
6/24/05
[Insert page
number
where the
document
begins]
6/24/05
[Insert page
number
where the
document
begins]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–12581 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63
[FRL–7927–4]
Delegation of Authority to the States of
Iowa and Kansas for New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS),
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP);
and Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of delegation of
authority.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The states of Iowa and Kansas
have submitted updated regulations for
delegation of EPA authority for
implementation and enforcement of
NSPS, NESHAP, and MACT. The
submissions cover new EPA standards
and, in some instances, revisions to
standards previously delegated. EPA’s
review of the pertinent regulations
shows that they contain adequate and
effective procedures for the
implementation and enforcement of
these Federal standards. This action
informs the public of delegations to the
above-mentioned agencies.
DATES: This document is effective on
June 24, 2005. The dates of delegation
can be found in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
ADDRESSES: Copies of documents
relative to this action are available for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
VerDate jul<14>2003
Additional explanation/
§ 52.2063 citation
16:42 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
*
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
Effective immediately, all
notifications, applications, reports, and
other correspondence required pursuant
to the newly delegated standards and
revisions identified in this document
must be submitted with respect to
sources located in the jurisdictions
identified in this document, to the
following addresses:
Iowa Department of Natural
Resources, Air Quality Bureau, 7900
Hickman Road, Urbandale, Iowa 50322.
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment, Bureau of Air and
Radiation, 1000 SW., Jackson, Suite 310,
Topeka, Kansas 66612.
Duplicates of required documents
must also continue to be submitted to
the EPA Regional Office at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leland Daniels at (913) 551–7651, or by
e-mail at daninels.leland@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
supplementary information is organized
in the following order:
*
*
(December 11, 2003). The EPA has
established procedures by which these
agencies are automatically delegated the
authority to implement the standards
when they adopt regulations which are
identical to the Federal standards. We
then periodically provide notice of the
new and revised standards for which
delegation has been given.
What is the authority for delegation?
1. Section 111(c)(1) of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) authorizes EPA to delegate
authority to any state agency which
submits adequate regulatory procedures
for implementation and enforcement of
the NSPS program. The NSPS are
codified at 40 CFR part 60.
2. Section 112(l) of the CAA and 40
CFR part 63, subpart E, authorizes the
EPA to delegate authority to any state or
local agency which submits adequate
regulatory procedures for
implementation and enforcement of
emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants. The hazardous air pollutant
standards are codified at 40 CFR parts
61 and 63, respectively.
What does delegation accomplish?
What does this action do?
What is the authority for delegation?
What does delegation accomplish?
What has been delegated?
What has not been delegated?
List of Delegation Tables
Table I—NSPS, 40 CFR part 60
Table II—NESHAP, 40 CFR part 61
Table III—NESHAP, 40 CFR part 63
Delegation confers primary
responsibility for implementation and
enforcement of the listed standards to
the respective state and local air
agencies. However, EPA also retains the
concurrent authority to enforce the
standards.
What has been delegated?
What does this action do?
The EPA is providing notice of an
update to its delegable authority for
implementation and enforcement of the
Federal standards shown in the tables
below to the states of Iowa and Kansas.
This rule updates the delegation tables
previously published at 68 FR 69029
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Tables I, II, and III below list the
delegated standards. Each item listed in
the Subpart column has two relevant
dates listed in each column for each
state. The first date in each block is the
reference date to the CFR contained in
the state rule. In general, the state or
local agency has adopted the applicable
standard through the date as noted in
the table. The second date is the most
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36511-36515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12581]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03-OAR-2005-PA-0014; FRL-7927-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Control of VOC Emissions From Aerospace,
Mobile Equipment, and Wood Furniture Surface Coating Applications for
Allegheny County
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the
Allegheny County portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision, submitted by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) on behalf of the
Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD), establishes standards and
requirements to control volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions
from aerospace, mobile equipment, and wood furniture surface coating
applications, and modifies existing regulations for general and
specific coating processes. This revision updates the ACHD's
regulations to make them consistent with the Commonwealth's SIP-
approved regulations regarding the affected surface coating processes.
EPA is approving this revision to the Allegheny portion of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of
the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 23, 2005, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by July 25, 2005.
If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R03-OAR-2005-PA-0014, by one of the following
methods:
A. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
B. Agency Web site: https://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp RME,
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
C. E-mail: campbell.dave@epa.gov.
D. Mail: R03-OAR-2005-PA-0014, David Campbell Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R03-OAR-2005-PA-
0014. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, and may be made available online at
https://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov
or e-mail. The EPA RME and the Federal regulations.gov Web sites are an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
RME index at https://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as
[[Page 36512]]
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Allegheny County Health Department, Bureau of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality, 301 39th Street,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15201.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814-2034, or by
e-mail at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 18, 2004, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on behalf of
Allegheny County, submitted a formal revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision modifies existing regulations
under ACHD's Rules and Regulations, Article XXI, sections 2101.20,
2105.01, and 2105.10 pertaining to surface coating processes in
general, and creates new sections, 2105.74, 2105.75, and 2105.76
specific to the aerospace, automotive, and wood furniture industries,
respectively. These new regulations are applicable to all automotive
touch-up and repair facilities, certain aircraft maintenance
facilities, and wood furniture manufacturing facilities that meet or
exceed specified emission thresholds.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The March 18, 2004 revision to the Pennsylvania SIP, submitted by
PADEP on behalf of Allegheny County, is based on recent PADEP
amendments, EPA Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs), and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). This
revision updates Allegheny County's Article XXI Air Pollution Control
Regulations to make them consistent with previously SIP-approved PADEP
regulations. Listed below is a summary of the SIP revision. For more
detailed information on this revision, please see the technical support
document (TSD) prepared for this rulemaking.
A. Part A--General, section 2101.20, Definitions
This revision adds and revises definitions in Article XXI, section
2101.20, Definitions, for terms that are used in the substantive
sections of 2105.74, Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework, 2105.75,
Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing, and 2105.76, Wood Furniture
Manufacturing Operations.
B. Part E--Source Emission and Operating Standards, section 2105.01,
Equivalent Compliance Techniques
This revision revises the VOC equivalency provisions of section
2105.01, Equivalent Compliance Techniques of the ACHD's Article XXI Air
Pollution Control Regulations. The revision authorizes compliance with
section 2105.01 by the use of an alternative method if that method is
incorporated by the Department into an applicable federally enforceable
installation permit or operating permit subject to review by EPA. The
revision removes the requirement that alternative compliance methods
for certain VOC requirements be submitted to EPA as a SIP revision.
This action will streamline the process for establishing alternative
compliance methods. EPA is approving this revision because any
alternative compliance method would be reviewed by EPA as a part of the
permitting process to ensure that it produced results equivalent to the
method specified in the regulations, thereby not jeopardizing
attainment of the ozone standard.
C. Part E--Source Emission and Operating Standards-Subpart 1, VOC
Sources, section 2105.10, Surface Coating Processes
This revision to the ACHD's Article XXI, section 2105.10, Surface
Coating Processes, revises equations for calculating VOC content,
recalculates emission limits on a ``per solids'' basis, and modifies
recordkeeping requirements. This regulation applies to a surface
coating process category, regardless of the size, which emits or has
emitted VOCs into the outdoor atmosphere in quantities greater than 3
pounds (1.4 kilograms) per hour, 15 pounds (7 kilograms) per day, or
2.7 tons (2,455 kilograms) per year during any calendar year since
January 1, 1987. A person may not cause or permit the emission into the
outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from a surface coating process category in
the regulation, unless the VOC content of each as applied coating is
equal to or less than the standard specified in the regulation, or the
overall weight of VOCs emitted to the atmosphere is reduced through the
use of vapor recovery or incineration or another method which is
acceptable under section 2105.01, Equivalent Compliance Techniques.
D. Part E--Source Emission and Operating Standards, Subpart 7--
Miscellaneous Sources, section 2105.74, Aerospace Manufacturing and
Rework
This revision adds a new section, 2105.74 to ACHD's Article XXI,
adopting requirements to control VOC emissions from coatings and
solvents used in the aerospace industry. This regulation updates ACHD's
Article XXI Air Pollution Control regulations to reflect existing PADEP
aerospace regulations, establishing emission limits and reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for aerospace sources that have the
potential to emit (PTE) 25 tons a year or more of VOCs. The aerospace
industry includes all manufacturing facilities that produce an
aerospace vehicle or component and all facilities that repair these
aerospace products. An aerospace vehicle or component is defined as,
but not limited to, any fabricated part, processed part, assembly of
parts, or completed unit of any aircraft including, but not limited to
airplanes, helicopters, missiles, rockets, and space vehicles. In
addition to manufacturing and repair facilities, some shops may
specialize in providing a service, such as chemical milling, rather
than actually producing a component or assembly. Aerospace coatings
that meet the definitions of the specific coatings of the regulation
shall meet those allowable VOC limits.
E. Part E--Source Emission and Operating Standards, Subpart 7--
Miscellaneous Sources, section 2105.75, Mobile Equipment Repair and
Refinishing
This revision adds a new section, 2105.75, to ACHD's Article XXI
Air Pollution Control Regulations, establishing allowable VOC-content
requirements for coatings used in mobile equipment repair and
refinishing. This regulation updates ACHD's Article XXI Air Pollution
Control regulations to reflect existing PADEP mobile equipment repair
and refinishing regulations. This regulation establishes emission
limits, equations for calculating content, application techniques, and
housekeeping requirements for non-assembly plant mobile equipment
repair and refinishing sources. This regulation applies to a person who
applies mobile equipment repair and refinishing or color-matched
coatings to mobile equipment or mobile equipment components. This
regulation does not apply to a person who applies surface coatings to
mobile equipment or mobile equipment components if the surface coating
process is subject to the miscellaneous metal parts finishing
[[Page 36513]]
requirements of the ACHD's Article XXI, section 2105.10, Surface
Coating Processes, if the surface coating process is at an automobile
assembly plant, or if the person applying the coatings does not receive
compensation for the application of the coatings. A person subject to
this regulation may not apply to mobile equipment or mobile equipment
components any automotive pretreatment, automotive primer-surfacer,
automotive primer-sealer, automotive topcoat, and automotive specialty
coatings, including any VOC-containing materials added to the original
coating supplied by the manufacturer, that contain VOCs in excess of
the limits specified in the regulation.
F. Part E--Source Emission and Operating Standards, Subpart 7--
Miscellaneous Sources, section 2105.76, Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations
This revision adds a new section, 2105.74 to ACHD's Article XXI,
adopting new VOC regulations for wood furniture operations including
wood furniture finishing, cleaning, and wash-off operations. This
regulation establishes emission limits and control technology for
sources that have a PTE of 25 tons a year or more of VOCs from wood
furniture manufacturing operations. In addition to setting VOC emission
limits, the new regulation establishes work practice standards,
compliance procedures, monitoring requirements, recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, and special provisions for facilities using an
emissions averaging approach. The limits in this regulation do not
apply to a coating used exclusively for determining product quality and
commercial acceptance, touch-up and repair, and other small quantity
coatings if the quantity of coating does not exceed 50 gallons per year
for a single coating, and a total of 200 gallons per year for all
coatings combined for the facility. The owner or operator of the
facility must submit a written request to the Department which must be
approved prior to the use of the coatings.
An owner or an operator of a facility subject to this regulation
shall limit VOC emissions from wood furniture manufacturing operations
by: (1) Applying either waterborne topcoats or a combination of sealers
and topcoats and strippable spray booth coatings with a VOC content
equal to or less than the standards specified in the regulation; (2)
using an emissions averaging program which meets the requirements of
the emissions averaging provisions of the regulation; (3) using a
control system that achieves a reduction in emissions equivalent to 0.8
lb VOC/lb solids for topcoats, or 1.8 lbs VOC/lb solids for topcoats
and 1.9 lbs VOC/lb solids for sealers; and (4) using a combination of
the above methods.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving a revision to the Allegheny County portion of the
Pennsylvania SIP consisting of amendments to section 2101.20,
Definitions, section 2105.01, Equivalent Compliance Techniques, and
section 2105.10, Surface Coating Processes. In addition, EPA is also
approving the addition to ACHD's Article XXI of new sections 2105.74,
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework, section 2105.75, Mobile Equipment
Repair and Refinishing, and section 2105.76, Wood Furniture
Manufacturing Operations. These revisions were submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on behalf of Allegheny County on March 18,
2004, and update ACHD's Article XXI regulations to make them consistent
with existing PADEP regulations.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's
Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve
as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on August 23, 2005, without further
notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 25, 2005. If EPA
receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of
[[Page 36514]]
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 23, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule,
revising Allegheny County's Article XXI, VOC Control, General and
Specific Surface Coating Applications, does not affect the finality of
this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This
action, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 15, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph(c)(2) is amended by
revising the title of the third column to read ``State effective
date''; adding an entry for Part A, 2101.20 after the existing entry
for 2101.20; adding entries for Part E, 2105.74, 2105.75, and 2105.76;
and revising entries for Part E, 2105.01 and 2105.10 to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
State EPA explanation/
Article XXI citation Title/subject effective approval Sec. 52.2063
date date citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART A General
* * * * * * *
2101.20..................... Definitions............................. 7/10/03 6/24/05
[Insert
page number
where the
document
begins]
* * * * * * *
PART E Source Emission and Operating Standards
2105.01..................... Equivalent Compliance Techniques........ 7/10/03 6/24/05
[Insert
page number
where the
document
begins]
* * * * * * *
Subpart 1 VOC Sources
2105.10..................... Surface Coating Processes............... 7/10/03 6/24/05
[Insert
page number
where the
document
begins]
* * * * * * *
Subpart 7 Miscellaneous VOC Sources
* * * * * * *
2105.74..................... Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework...... 7/10/03 6/24/05
[Insert
page number
where the
document
begins]
[[Page 36515]]
2105.75..................... Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing. 7/10/03 6/24/05
[Insert
page number
where the
document
begins]
2105.76..................... Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations. 7/10/03 6/24/05
[Insert
page number
where the
document
begins]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-12581 Filed 6-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P