Notice of Availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on Wind Energy Development on BLM-Administered Lands in the Western United States, Including Proposed Amendments to Selected Land Use Plans, 36651-36653 [05-12475]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Notices
direction for conserving wildlife and
their habitats, the CCPs identify
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update these CCPs at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, and the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370d).
The major focus of the Refuge for the
next 15 years will be building a refuge
land base, programs, and staff primarily
through partnerships and cooperative
agreements with landowners and local
non-government organizations. The
Refuge’s key biological focus will be
conserving and enhancing remnant
coastal wetlands and island habitats for
the benefit of the migratory birds,
especially diving waterfowl. A modest
visitor services program is proposed on
existing Refuge lands. Grassy Island is
closed due to safety concerns and Mud
and Calf Islands can only be reached
using watercraft. However, public
programs could expand if a shared
visitor center is built adjacent to the
Refuge’s Humbug Marsh.
on June 1, 2005. This notice will
continue the closure for another year, to
remain in effect through June 1, 2006.
Effective Dates: This extension of
closure is effective June 1, 2005, and
shall remain effective until June 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Thompson, Burley Field Office,
200 South 15 East, Burley, ID 83318.
Telephone (208) 677–6641.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
public lands affected by this closure are
all lands administered by the BLM
within T. 15 S., R. 24 E., Sec. 8, Boise
Meridian. This area is known as Castle
Rocks State Park and Castle Rocks InterAgency Recreation Area. A closure
notice including time periods will be
posted near the entry point at the Castle
Rocks Ranch House.
Dated: December 2, 2004.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ft. Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 05–12501 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
Dated: May 18, 2005.
Wendy Reynolds,
Burley Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 05–12476 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
Authority: This notice is issued under the
authority of the 43 CFR 8364.1. Violations of
this closure are punishable by a fine not to
exceed $1,000 or imprisonment not to exceed
12 months.
Persons who are administratively
exempt from the closure contained in
this notice include: any Federal, State or
local officer or employee acting within
the scope of their duties, members of
any organized rescue or fire-fighting
force in the performance of an official
duty, and any person holding written
authorization from the BLM.
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
36651
The application will be processed in
accordance with the provisions of the
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as
amended (30 U.S.C. 181, et seq.), and
the implementing regulations at 43 CFR
part 3400. A decision to allow leasing of
the coal reserves in said tract will result
in a competitive lease sale to be held at
a time and place to be announced
through publication pursuant to 43 CFR
part 3422.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Sprugin, Coal Coordinator, at
telephone 406–896–5080, Bureau of
Land Management, Montana State
Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, P.O. Box
36800, Billings, Montana 59107–6800.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Decker
Coal Company is the operator of the
West Decker Mine. The entire area
included within this lease application
lies within the West Decker Mine
SMP87001C permit area.
The area applied for would be mined
as an extension of the West Decker Mine
and would utilize the same methods as
those currently being used. The lease
being applied for can extend the life of
the mine by about 1 year and enable
recovery of coal that might never be
mined if not mined as a logical
extension of current pits.
Notice of Availability: The application
is available for review between the
hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. at the Bureau
of Land Management, Montana State
Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings,
Montana 59101, and at the Bureau of
Land Management, Miles City Field
Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City,
Montana, 59301–0940, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
March 30, 2005.
Randy D. Heuscher,
Chief, Branch of Solid Minerals.
[FR Doc. 05–12474 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Land Management
[MT–921–05–1320–EL–P; MTM 94393]
[ID–220–1220–MA]
Notice of Coal Lease Application—
MTM 94393—Decker Coal Company
BILLING CODE 4310–88–M
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Notice of Continuation of Temporary
Closure of Castle Rocks State Park
and Castle Rocks Inter-Agency
Recreation Area near Almo, ID
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management announces the
continuation of temporary closure of
certain public lands in Cassia County.
This closure prohibits bolting and
placement of fixed anchors to rocks, and
overnight camping. This is to allow
further time for analysis of a fixed
anchor management plan.
DATES: A temporary closure in this area
is now in place, currently set to expire
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:06 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
AGENCY:
Notice of Decker Coal
Company’s Coal Lease Application
MTM 94393 for certain coal resources
within the Powder River Coal Region.
The land included in Coal Lease
Application MTM 94393 is located in
Big Horn County, Montana, and is
described as follows:
Bureau of Land Management
[WO–350–1430–PN]
SUMMARY:
T. 9 S., R. 40 E., P.M.M.
Sec. 5: SE1⁄4SE1⁄4
Sec. 8: NW1⁄4NE1⁄4NE1⁄4
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Land Management.
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
The 49.60-acre tract contains an
estimated 4 million tons of recoverable
coal reserves.
PO 00000
Notice of Availability of the Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement on Wind Energy
Development on BLM-Administered
Lands in the Western United States,
Including Proposed Amendments to
Selected Land Use Plans
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
36652
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Notices
prepared a Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
for wind energy development in eleven
western states, excluding Alaska, that
also proposes to amend 52 land use
plans.
DATES: BLM land use planning
regulations (43 CFR 1610.5–2) state that
any person who participated in the
planning process, and has an interest
that may be adversely affected, may
protest. The protest must be filed within
30 days of the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes this notice in the Federal
Register. Instructions for filing of
protests are described in the ‘‘Dear
Reader’’ letter in the front of the Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement on Wind Energy
Development on BLM-Administered
Lands in the Western United States and
are included in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray
Brady, Group Manager, Lands and
Realty (WO–350), Bureau of Land
Management, 1849 C St., NW., Mail
Stop 1000 LS, Washington, DC 20240.
Ph: 202–452–7773.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
prepared the Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement on
Wind Energy Development on BLMAdministered Lands in the Western
United States to (1) assess the
environmental, social, and economic
impacts associated with wind energy
development on public lands in eleven
western states (excluding Alaska) and
(2) evaluate a number of alternatives to
determine the best management
approach to mitigating potential impacts
and facilitating wind energy
development. The Final PEIS analyzes
three alternatives for managing wind
energy development on BLMadministered lands. The alternatives
are: (1) The proposed action, which
would implement a Wind Energy
Development Program, establish
policies and best management practices
(BMPs) for wind energy right-of-way
(ROW) authorizations, and amend 52
BLM land use plans; (2) the no action
alternative, which would allow
continued wind energy development
under the terms and conditions of the
BLM Interim Wind Energy Development
Policy, and (3) a limited wind energy
development alternative, which would
allow wind energy development only in
selected locations. The proposed action
to implement a Wind Energy
Development Program is the BLM’s
preferred alternative.
As stated above, the proposed action
would establish a comprehensive
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:06 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
program to address wind energy
development on BLM-administered
lands. The policies and BMPs
developed under the proposed Wind
Energy Development Program would
establish minimum requirements for
management of individual wind energy
projects. The proposed policies identify
management objectives and address the
administration of wind energy
development activities. The proposed
BMPs identify required mitigation
measures that would need to be
incorporated into project-specific wind
energy development proposals. In
addition, the proposed action would
amend 52 BLM land use plans. The
proposed land use plan amendments
include: (1) the adoption of
programmatic wind energy development
policies and BMPs and (2) identification
of specific areas where wind energy
development would not be allowed. The
purpose of the proposed land use plan
amendments is to facilitate preparation
and consideration of potential wind
energy development ROW applications
on BLM-administered lands, but not to
eliminate the need for site-specific
analysis of individual development
proposals.
The following Resource Management
Plan (RMP) and Management
Framework Plan (MFP) land use plans,
itemized in Appendix C of the Final
PEIS, are proposed for amendment:
Colorado: Royal Gorge RMP and San
Luis RMP; Idaho: Cascade RMP, Challis
RMP, Jarbridge RMP, Kuna MFP, Lemhi
RMP, Owyhee RMP, and Twin Falls
MFP; Montana: Billings RMP, Garnet
RMP, Headwaters RMP, Judith-ValleyPhillips RMP, and West HiLine RMP;
Nevada: Elko RMP, Las Vegas RMP,
Paradise-Denio MFP, Shoshone-Eureka
RMP, Sonoma-Gerlach MFP, Tonopah
RMP, and Wells RMP; New Mexico:
Carlsbad RMP, Mimbres RMP, Roswell
RMP, and White Sands RMP; Oregon:
Andrews/Steens RMP (currently being
revised to replace the Andrews MFP
and revise part of the Three Rivers
RMP), Brothers/La Pine RMP, Coos Bay
RMP, Eugene RMP, John Day RMP,
Medford RMP, Salem RMP, Southeast
Oregon RMP, Three Rivers RMP, Two
Rivers RMP, and Upper Deschutes RMP
(currently being revised to replace a
portion of the Brothers/LaPine RMP);
Utah: Cedar-Beaver-Garfield-Antimony
RMP, Escalante MFP, Paria MFP,
Pinyon MFP, Randolf MFP, St. George
RMP, Vermillion MFP, and Zion MFP;
Washington: Spokane RMP; Wyoming:
Buffalo RMP, Cody RMP, Grass Creek
RMP, Green River RMP, Lander RMP,
New Castle RMP, and Washakie RMP.
No land use plans are proposed for
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amendment in Arizona or California as
part of the Final PEIS; ongoing and
future land use plan amendments in
these states will address wind energy
development where developable wind
resources are present.
The Draft Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement on
Wind Energy Development on BLMAdministered Lands in the Western
United States was made available for
public review and comment from
September 10, 2004, to December 10,
2004. The Draft PEIS was posted on the
project Web site at https://
windeis.anl.gov and provided on request
as a CD or printed document. More than
120 individuals and organizations
participated in the public comment
process, including more than 60
recognized organizations (public and
private). About 77% of the documents
were received via the project Web site
and 23% were received via regular mail.
On the basis of comment categorization,
approximately 718 individual
comments were identified.
Volume 3 of the Final PEIS contains
the public comments on the Draft PEIS
and the BLM’s responses. Public
comments addressed a broad range of
issues. About 31% of the comments
were categorized as addressing
ecological issues, including monitoring
and mitigation; 21% addressed policy
issues; 17% addressed avian issues,
10% addressed bat issues; 8%
addressed issues related to the scope of
the PEIS and the alternatives evaluated;
6% addressed sage-grouse issues; 6%
addressed transmission issues; and 4%
of the comments addressed land use
issues. The remainder of the issues were
divided across a number of topics (each
comprising less than 3% of the total),
including engineering, cumulative
impacts, cultural resources, economics,
visual impacts, wind resource modeling
approach, noise, regulatory issues,
water, waste, air quality, geology, and
transportation issues. (The percentages
total more than 100% because many of
the comments can be categorized under
more than one key issue). Public
comments on the Draft PEIS, including
the proposed land use plan
amendments, and internal BLM review
comments were incorporated into the
Final PEIS. Public comments resulted in
the addition of clarifying text, but did
not significantly change the proposed
action or proposed land use plan
amendments.
Government-to-Government
consultation regarding potential wind
energy development and land use plan
amendments on BLM-administered
lands was conducted with Tribal
entities whose interests might be
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2005 / Notices
directly and substantially affected. The
Tribal entities contacted are listed in
Chapter 7 in the Final PEIS.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
cooperated with the BLM in preparation
of the PEIS. In addition, the BLM
consulted with other federal agencies
during preparation of the Draft and
Final PEIS, including the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Air
Force, and agency representatives to the
Federal Energy Resources Network. In
accordance with a memorandum of
agreement between the BLM and the
USFWS, the BLM is consulting with the
USFWS regarding the proposed land use
plan amendments. These consultations
will be conducted in accordance with
the requirements of Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C.
1536) and are expected to result in the
issuance of a programmatic biological
assessment and biological opinion.
In addition, the BLM initiated
activities to coordinate and consult with
the governors of each of the eleven
western states addressed in the PEIS
and with state agencies. Prior to the
issuance of a record of decision and
approval of proposed land use plan
amendments, the governor of each state
will be given the opportunity to identify
any inconsistencies between the
proposed land use plan amendments
and state or local plans and to provide
recommendations in writing during the
60-day consistency review period
required by the BLM land use planning
regulations (43 CFR 1610.3–2).
Copies of the Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement on
Wind Energy Development on BLMAdministered Lands in the Western
United States, including the proposed
land use plan amendments (Appendix
C), have been sent to the Environmental
Protection Agency, DOI Office of
Environmental Policy and Compliance,
DOI Library, and the governors office in
each of the eleven western states. Copies
of the Final PEIS are available at the
BLM State Offices in the eleven western
states and the BLM Washington Office,
Public Affairs Office. Interested persons
may also review the Final PEIS and
proposed land use plan amendments on
the Internet at https://windeis.anl.gov.
Instructions for filing a protest
regarding the proposed land use plan
amendments may be found at 43 CFR
1610.5. A protest may only raise those
issues which were submitted for the
record during the NEPA/planning
process. E-mail and faxed protests will
not be accepted as valid protests unless
the protesting party also provides the
original letter by either regular or
overnight mail postmarked by the close
of the protest period. Under these
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:06 Jun 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
conditions, the e-mail or faxed protest
will be considered as an advance copy
and it will receive full consideration. If
you wish to provide such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests
to the attention of the BLM protest
coordinator at 202–452–5112, and emails to Brenda_HudgensWilliams@blm.gov.
Please direct the follow-up letter to
the appropriate address provided below.
The protest must contain:
a. The name, mailing address,
telephone number, and interest of the
person filing the protest.
b. A statement of the specific land use
plan(s) by name and the amendment(s)
being protested.
c. A copy of all documents addressing
the issue(s) that the protesting party
submitted during the NEPA/planning
process or a statement of the date they
were discussed for the record.
d. A concise statement explaining
why the protestor believes the proposed
land use plan amendment(s) is wrong.
All protests must be in writing and
mailed to the following address:
Regular Mail: Bureau of Land
Management, Director (210), Attention:
Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 66538,
Washington, DC 20035.
Overnight Mail: Bureau of Land
Management, Director (210), Attention:
Brenda Williams, 1620 L Street, NW.,
Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20036.
Individual respondents may request
confidentiality. If you wish to withhold
your name or street address from public
review or from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act, you must
state this prominently at the beginning
of your written comment. Such requests
will be honored to the extent allowed by
law. All submissions from organizations
and businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
A decision shall be rendered
promptly on the protest. The decision
will be in writing and will be sent to the
protesting party by certified mail, return
receipt requested.
Dated: May 13, 2005.
Ray Brady,
Group Manager, Lands and Realty.
[FR Doc. 05–12475 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT–020–1020–PK]
Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern
Montana Resource Advisory Council
Meeting
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), Eastern
Montana Resource Advisory Council
will meet as indicated below.
A meeting will be held July 20,
2005, at the Wyoming Game and Fish
Department, 700 Valley View Drive,
Sheridan, Wyoming, beginning at 8 a.m.
The public comment period will begin
at 11:30 a.m.
DATES:
The 15member Council advises the Secretary
of the Interior, through the Bureau of
Land Management, on a variety of
planning and management issues
associated with public land
management in eastern Montana. All
meetings are open to the public. The
public may present written comments to
the Council. Each formal Council
meeting will also have time allocated for
hearing public comments. Depending on
the number of persons wishing to
comment and time available, the time
for individual oral comments may be
limited. Individuals who plan to attend
and need special assistance, such as
sign language interpretation, or other
reasonable accommodations, should
contact the BLM as provided below. The
Council will hear updates on the Miles
City Resource Management Plan,
coalbed natural gas, and other issues.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Apple, Resource Advisory Council
Coordinator, Montana State Office, 5001
Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana,
59101, telephone 406–896–5258 or
Sandra S. Brooks, Field Manager,
Billings Field Office, telephone 406–
896–5013.
Dated: June 20, 2005.
Sandra S. Brooks,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 05–12634 Filed 6–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36653
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36651-36653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WO-350-1430-PN]
Notice of Availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement on Wind Energy Development on BLM-Administered Lands
in the Western United States, Including Proposed Amendments to Selected
Land Use Plans
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
[[Page 36652]]
prepared a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for
wind energy development in eleven western states, excluding Alaska,
that also proposes to amend 52 land use plans.
DATES: BLM land use planning regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-2) state that
any person who participated in the planning process, and has an
interest that may be adversely affected, may protest. The protest must
be filed within 30 days of the date that the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes this notice in the Federal Register. Instructions for
filing of protests are described in the ``Dear Reader'' letter in the
front of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on Wind
Energy Development on BLM-Administered Lands in the Western United
States and are included in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray Brady, Group Manager, Lands and
Realty (WO-350), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C St., NW., Mail Stop
1000 LS, Washington, DC 20240. Ph: 202-452-7773.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM prepared the Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement on Wind Energy Development on BLM-
Administered Lands in the Western United States to (1) assess the
environmental, social, and economic impacts associated with wind energy
development on public lands in eleven western states (excluding Alaska)
and (2) evaluate a number of alternatives to determine the best
management approach to mitigating potential impacts and facilitating
wind energy development. The Final PEIS analyzes three alternatives for
managing wind energy development on BLM-administered lands. The
alternatives are: (1) The proposed action, which would implement a Wind
Energy Development Program, establish policies and best management
practices (BMPs) for wind energy right-of-way (ROW) authorizations, and
amend 52 BLM land use plans; (2) the no action alternative, which would
allow continued wind energy development under the terms and conditions
of the BLM Interim Wind Energy Development Policy, and (3) a limited
wind energy development alternative, which would allow wind energy
development only in selected locations. The proposed action to
implement a Wind Energy Development Program is the BLM's preferred
alternative.
As stated above, the proposed action would establish a
comprehensive program to address wind energy development on BLM-
administered lands. The policies and BMPs developed under the proposed
Wind Energy Development Program would establish minimum requirements
for management of individual wind energy projects. The proposed
policies identify management objectives and address the administration
of wind energy development activities. The proposed BMPs identify
required mitigation measures that would need to be incorporated into
project-specific wind energy development proposals. In addition, the
proposed action would amend 52 BLM land use plans. The proposed land
use plan amendments include: (1) the adoption of programmatic wind
energy development policies and BMPs and (2) identification of specific
areas where wind energy development would not be allowed. The purpose
of the proposed land use plan amendments is to facilitate preparation
and consideration of potential wind energy development ROW applications
on BLM-administered lands, but not to eliminate the need for site-
specific analysis of individual development proposals.
The following Resource Management Plan (RMP) and Management
Framework Plan (MFP) land use plans, itemized in Appendix C of the
Final PEIS, are proposed for amendment: Colorado: Royal Gorge RMP and
San Luis RMP; Idaho: Cascade RMP, Challis RMP, Jarbridge RMP, Kuna MFP,
Lemhi RMP, Owyhee RMP, and Twin Falls MFP; Montana: Billings RMP,
Garnet RMP, Headwaters RMP, Judith-Valley-Phillips RMP, and West HiLine
RMP; Nevada: Elko RMP, Las Vegas RMP, Paradise-Denio MFP, Shoshone-
Eureka RMP, Sonoma-Gerlach MFP, Tonopah RMP, and Wells RMP; New Mexico:
Carlsbad RMP, Mimbres RMP, Roswell RMP, and White Sands RMP; Oregon:
Andrews/Steens RMP (currently being revised to replace the Andrews MFP
and revise part of the Three Rivers RMP), Brothers/La Pine RMP, Coos
Bay RMP, Eugene RMP, John Day RMP, Medford RMP, Salem RMP, Southeast
Oregon RMP, Three Rivers RMP, Two Rivers RMP, and Upper Deschutes RMP
(currently being revised to replace a portion of the Brothers/LaPine
RMP); Utah: Cedar-Beaver-Garfield-Antimony RMP, Escalante MFP, Paria
MFP, Pinyon MFP, Randolf MFP, St. George RMP, Vermillion MFP, and Zion
MFP; Washington: Spokane RMP; Wyoming: Buffalo RMP, Cody RMP, Grass
Creek RMP, Green River RMP, Lander RMP, New Castle RMP, and Washakie
RMP. No land use plans are proposed for amendment in Arizona or
California as part of the Final PEIS; ongoing and future land use plan
amendments in these states will address wind energy development where
developable wind resources are present.
The Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on Wind
Energy Development on BLM-Administered Lands in the Western United
States was made available for public review and comment from September
10, 2004, to December 10, 2004. The Draft PEIS was posted on the
project Web site at https://windeis.anl.gov and provided on request as a
CD or printed document. More than 120 individuals and organizations
participated in the public comment process, including more than 60
recognized organizations (public and private). About 77% of the
documents were received via the project Web site and 23% were received
via regular mail. On the basis of comment categorization, approximately
718 individual comments were identified.
Volume 3 of the Final PEIS contains the public comments on the
Draft PEIS and the BLM's responses. Public comments addressed a broad
range of issues. About 31% of the comments were categorized as
addressing ecological issues, including monitoring and mitigation; 21%
addressed policy issues; 17% addressed avian issues, 10% addressed bat
issues; 8% addressed issues related to the scope of the PEIS and the
alternatives evaluated; 6% addressed sage-grouse issues; 6% addressed
transmission issues; and 4% of the comments addressed land use issues.
The remainder of the issues were divided across a number of topics
(each comprising less than 3% of the total), including engineering,
cumulative impacts, cultural resources, economics, visual impacts, wind
resource modeling approach, noise, regulatory issues, water, waste, air
quality, geology, and transportation issues. (The percentages total
more than 100% because many of the comments can be categorized under
more than one key issue). Public comments on the Draft PEIS, including
the proposed land use plan amendments, and internal BLM review comments
were incorporated into the Final PEIS. Public comments resulted in the
addition of clarifying text, but did not significantly change the
proposed action or proposed land use plan amendments.
Government-to-Government consultation regarding potential wind
energy development and land use plan amendments on BLM-administered
lands was conducted with Tribal entities whose interests might be
[[Page 36653]]
directly and substantially affected. The Tribal entities contacted are
listed in Chapter 7 in the Final PEIS.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cooperated with the BLM in
preparation of the PEIS. In addition, the BLM consulted with other
federal agencies during preparation of the Draft and Final PEIS,
including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Air Force,
and agency representatives to the Federal Energy Resources Network. In
accordance with a memorandum of agreement between the BLM and the
USFWS, the BLM is consulting with the USFWS regarding the proposed land
use plan amendments. These consultations will be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) and are expected to result in the issuance of a
programmatic biological assessment and biological opinion.
In addition, the BLM initiated activities to coordinate and consult
with the governors of each of the eleven western states addressed in
the PEIS and with state agencies. Prior to the issuance of a record of
decision and approval of proposed land use plan amendments, the
governor of each state will be given the opportunity to identify any
inconsistencies between the proposed land use plan amendments and state
or local plans and to provide recommendations in writing during the 60-
day consistency review period required by the BLM land use planning
regulations (43 CFR 1610.3-2).
Copies of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on
Wind Energy Development on BLM-Administered Lands in the Western United
States, including the proposed land use plan amendments (Appendix C),
have been sent to the Environmental Protection Agency, DOI Office of
Environmental Policy and Compliance, DOI Library, and the governors
office in each of the eleven western states. Copies of the Final PEIS
are available at the BLM State Offices in the eleven western states and
the BLM Washington Office, Public Affairs Office. Interested persons
may also review the Final PEIS and proposed land use plan amendments on
the Internet at https://windeis.anl.gov.
Instructions for filing a protest regarding the proposed land use
plan amendments may be found at 43 CFR 1610.5. A protest may only raise
those issues which were submitted for the record during the NEPA/
planning process. E-mail and faxed protests will not be accepted as
valid protests unless the protesting party also provides the original
letter by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of
the protest period. Under these conditions, the e-mail or faxed protest
will be considered as an advance copy and it will receive full
consideration. If you wish to provide such advance notification, please
direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator
at 202-452-5112, and e-mails to Brenda--Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.
Please direct the follow-up letter to the appropriate address
provided below.
The protest must contain:
a. The name, mailing address, telephone number, and interest of the
person filing the protest.
b. A statement of the specific land use plan(s) by name and the
amendment(s) being protested.
c. A copy of all documents addressing the issue(s) that the
protesting party submitted during the NEPA/planning process or a
statement of the date they were discussed for the record.
d. A concise statement explaining why the protestor believes the
proposed land use plan amendment(s) is wrong.
All protests must be in writing and mailed to the following
address:
Regular Mail: Bureau of Land Management, Director (210), Attention:
Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 66538, Washington, DC 20035.
Overnight Mail: Bureau of Land Management, Director (210),
Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington,
DC 20036.
Individual respondents may request confidentiality. If you wish to
withhold your name or street address from public review or from
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your written comment. Such requests
will be honored to the extent allowed by law. All submissions from
organizations and businesses, and from individuals identifying
themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or
businesses, will be available for public inspection in their entirety.
A decision shall be rendered promptly on the protest. The decision
will be in writing and will be sent to the protesting party by
certified mail, return receipt requested.
Dated: May 13, 2005.
Ray Brady,
Group Manager, Lands and Realty.
[FR Doc. 05-12475 Filed 6-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P