Special Conditions; Duncan Aviation Inc., EFIS on the Raytheon 300 King Air; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF), 35985-35987 [05-12363]
Download as PDF
35985
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 119
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. 229, Special Condition 23–168–
SC]
Special Conditions; Duncan Aviation
Inc., EFIS on the Raytheon 300 King
Air; Protection of Systems for High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued to Duncan Aviation Inc., 15745 S
Airport Rd Battle Creek, MI 49015, for
a Supplemental Type Certificate for the
Raytheon 300 King Air. This airplane
will have novel and unusual design
features when compared to the state of
technology envisaged in the applicable
airworthiness standards. These novel
and unusual design features include the
installation of an electronic flight
instrument system (EFIS). The EFIS
consists of the Universal Avionics, Inc.
EFI–890R system for which the
applicable regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate airworthiness
standards for the protection of these
systems from the effects of high
intensity radiated fields (HIRF). The
installation includes three EFI–890R
Flat Panel Displays (two Primary Flight
Displays Pilot/Copilot and one
Navigational Displays Pilot), and
supporting equipment. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to the airworthiness
standards applicable to these airplanes.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is June 15, 2005.
Comments must be received on or
before July 22, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Comments may be mailed
in duplicate to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk,
Docket No. 229, Room 506, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. All
comments must be marked: Docket No.
CE229. Comments may be inspected in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wes
Ryan, AerospaceEngineer, Standards
Office (ACE–110), Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone
(816) 329–4127.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA, therefore, finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
submit such written data, views, or
arguments, as they may desire.
Communications should identify the
regulatory docket or notice number and
be submitted in duplicate to the address
specified above. All communications
received on or before the closing date
for comments will be considered by the
Administrator. The special conditions
may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments
received will be available in the Rules
Docket for examination by interested
persons, both before and after the
closing date for comments. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice
must include a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. 229.’’ The postcard will be
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
date stamped and returned to the
commenter.
Background
Duncan Aviation made application to
the FAA for a new Supplemental Type
Certificate for the Raytheon Model 300.
The Raytheon Model 300 is currently
approved under TC No. A24CE. The
proposed modification incorporates a
novel or unusual design features, such
as a digital Primary Flight Display, that
may be vulnerable to HIRF external to
the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR part
21, § 21.101, Duncan Aviation must
show that the Raytheon Model 300
aircraft meets the original certification
basis for the airplane, as listed on Type
Data Sheet A24CE, additional
certification requirements added for the
Universal Avionics EFI–890 system,
exemptions, if any; and the special
conditions adopted by this rulemaking
action. The rules that were applied at
Part 23 Amendment 54 for this STC
include 23.1301, 23.1311, 23.1309,
23.1321, 23.1322, 23.1325, and 23.1543.
Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness standards do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards because of novel or
unusual design features of an airplane,
special conditions are prescribed under
the provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions, as appropriate, as
defined in § 11.19, are issued in
accordance with § 11.38 after public
notice and become part of the type
certification basis in accordance with
§ 21.101.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the applicant apply
for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model already
included on the same type certificate to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under the provisions of § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Duncan Aviation plans to incorporate
certain novel and unusual design
features into the Raytheon Model 300
airplane for which the airworthiness
standards do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
35986
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
protection from the effects of HIRF.
These features include EFIS, which are
susceptible to the HIRF environment,
that were not envisaged by the existing
regulations for this type of airplane.
Protection of Systems from High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF): Recent
advances in technology have given rise
to the application in aircraft designs of
advanced electrical and electronic
systems that perform functions required
for continued safe flight and landing.
Due to the use of sensitive solid-state
advanced components in analog and
digital electronics circuits, these
advanced systems are readily responsive
to the transient effects of induced
electrical current and voltage caused by
the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade
electronic systems performance by
damaging components or upsetting
system functions.
Furthermore, the HIRF environment
has undergone a transformation that was
not foreseen when the current
requirements were developed. Higher
energy levels are radiated from
transmitters that are used for radar,
radio, and television. Also, the number
of transmitters has increased
significantly. There is also uncertainty
concerning the effectiveness of airframe
shielding for HIRF. Furthermore,
coupling to cockpit-installed equipment
through the cockpit window apertures is
undefined.
The combined effect of the
technological advances in airplane
design and the changing environment
has resulted in an increased level of
vulnerability of electrical and electronic
systems required for the continued safe
flight and landing of the airplane.
Effective measures against the effects of
exposure to HIRF must be provided by
the design and installation of these
systems. The accepted maximum energy
levels in which civilian airplane system
installations must be capable of
operating safely are based on surveys
and analysis of existing radio frequency
emitters. These special conditions
require that the airplane be evaluated
under these energy levels for the
protection of the electronic system and
its associated wiring harness. These
external threat levels, which are lower
than previous required values, are
believed to represent the worst case to
which an airplane would be exposed in
the operating environment.
These special conditions require
qualification of systems that perform
critical functions, as installed in aircraft,
to the defined HIRF environment in
paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed
value using laboratory tests, in
paragraph 2, as follows:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
(1) The applicant may demonstrate
that the operation and operational
capability of the installed electrical and
electronic systems that perform critical
functions are not adversely affected
when the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF
environment defined below:
Frequency
Field strength
(volts per meter)
Peak
10 kHz–100 kHz
100 kHz–500
kHz ................
500 kHz–2 MHz
2 MHz–30 MHz
30 MHz–70 MHz
70 MHz–100
MHz ...............
100 MHz–200
MHz ...............
200 MHz–400
MHz ...............
400 MHz–700
MHz ...............
700 MHz–1 GHz
1 GHz–2 GHz ...
2 GHz–4 GHz ...
4 GHz–6 GHz ...
6 GHz–8 GHz ...
8 GHz–12 GHz
12 GHz–18 GHz
18 GHz–40 GHz
Average
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
700
700
2000
3000
3000
1000
3000
2000
600
100
200
200
200
200
300
200
200
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by
a system test and analysis that the
electrical and electronic systems that
perform critical functions can withstand
a minimum threat of 100 volts per
meter, electrical field strength, from 10
kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test to
show compliance with the HIRF
requirements, no credit is given for
signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must
be performed by the applicant for
approval by the FAA to identify either
electrical or electronic systems that
perform critical functions. The term
‘‘critical’’ means those functions, whose
failure would contribute to, or cause, a
failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane. The systems identified by the
hazard analysis that perform critical
functions are candidates for the
application of HIRF requirements. A
system may perform both critical and
non-critical functions. Primary
electronic flight display systems, and
their associated components, perform
critical functions such as attitude,
altitude, and airspeed indication. The
HIRF requirements apply only to critical
functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements
may be demonstrated by tests, analysis,
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the
Raytheon Model 300. Should Duncan
Aviation apply at a later date for a
50 supplemental type certificate to modify
any other model on the same type
100 certificate to incorporate the same novel
100 or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
50 well under the provisions of § 21.101.
The field strengths are expressed in terms
of peak root-mean-square (rms) values.
PO 00000
models, similarity with existing
systems, or any combination of these.
Service experience alone is not
acceptable since normal flight
operations may not include an exposure
to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a
system with similar design features for
redundancy as a means of protection
against the effects of external HIRF is
generally insufficient since all elements
of a redundant system are likely to be
exposed to the fields concurrently.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. For this reason, and
because a delay would significantly
affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has
determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon
issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior
opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these special
conditions is as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
action for the repetitive inspections, and
repairing any crack. This AD is
I Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
prompted by reports of hydraulic
delegated to me by the Administrator,
pressure loss in either the number 1 or
the following special conditions are
number 2 hydraulic system due to
issued as part of the type certification
breakage or leakage of hydraulic lines in
basis for the Raytheon Model 300
the aft equipment bay and reports of
airplane modified by Duncan Aviation to cracks on the aft pressure bulkhead web
add the Universal Avionics EFI–890
around these feed-through holes. We are
system.
issuing this AD to prevent loss of
1. Protection of Electrical and
hydraulic pressure, which could result
Electronic Systems from High Intensity
in reduced controllability of the
Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system
airplane, and to detect and correct
that performs critical functions must be
cracks on the aft pressure bulkhead web,
designed and installed to ensure that the which could result in reduced structural
operations, and operational capabilities
integrity of the aft pressure bulkhead.
of these systems to perform critical
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
functions, are not adversely affected
27, 2005.
when the airplane is exposed to high
The incorporation by reference of a
intensity radiated electromagnetic fields
certain publication listed in the AD is
external to the airplane.
approved by the Director of the Federal
2. For the purpose of these special
Register as of July 27, 2005.
conditions, the following definition
ADDRESSES: For service information
applies: Critical Functions: Functions
identified in this AD, contact
whose failure would contribute to, or
Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace
cause, a failure condition that would
Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station Centreprevent the continued safe flight and
ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9,
landing of the airplane.
Canada.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on June 15,
Docket: The AD docket contains the
2005.
proposed AD, comments, and any final
John R. Colomy,
disposition. You can examine the AD
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
docket on the Internet at https://
Aircraft Certification Service.
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
[FR Doc. 05–12363 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
Management Facility office between 9
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
Federal Aviation Administration
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street SW., room PL–401,
14 CFR Part 39
Washington, DC. This docket number is
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19754; Directorate
FAA–2004–19754; the directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–181–AD; Amendment
identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–
39–14138; AD 2005–13–02]
181–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RIN 2120–AA64
Serge Napoleon, Aerospace Engineer,
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE–
Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Series 700 & 701) Series Airplanes, and Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet
Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, New York
Series 900) Series Airplanes
11590; telephone (516) 228–7312; fax
(516) 794–5531.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
Administration (FAA), Department of
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with
Transportation (DOT).
an AD for certain Bombardier Model
ACTION: Final rule.
CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet series 700 &
701) series airplanes, and Model CL–
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
600–2D24 (Regional Jet series 900)
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
series airplanes. That action, published
Bombardier Model CL–600–2C10
in the Federal Register on December 1,
(Regional Jet series 700 & 701) series
2004 (69 FR 69842), proposed to require
airplanes, and Model CL–600–2D24
(Regional Jet series 900) series airplanes. revising the Airworthiness Limitations
section of the Instructions of Continued
This AD requires revising the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the Airworthiness by incorporating new
Instructions of Continued Airworthiness repetitive inspections and an optional
terminating action for the repetitive
by incorporating new repetitive
inspections and an optional terminating inspections, and repairing any crack.
The Special Conditions
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35987
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments that have
been submitted on the proposed AD.
Request To Remove Airplanes From the
Applicability
One commenter requests that certain
airplane serial numbers be excluded
from the applicability specified in
paragraph (c) of the proposed AD. The
commenter states that the inspection of
the hydraulic tube adapters specified in
Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series
Temporary Revision (TR) MRM2–129,
dated June 1, 2004 (referenced in the
proposed AD as the appropriate source
of service information), should be
applicable to Bombardier Model CL–
600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700 &
701) series airplanes having serial
numbers 10003 through 10099
inclusive, since Modification Summary
670T11944 was introduced in
production at serial number 10100. The
commenter also states the two
remaining inspections of the bulkhead
assembly and pylon pressure pan
specified in TR MRM2–129 should be
applicable to only airplanes having
serial numbers 10003 through 10156
inclusive, since Modification Summary
670T11508 was incorporated in
production at serial number 10157.
We agree. Bombardier CRJ 700/900
Series MRM2–129, dated June 1, 2004,
identifies Modification Summaries
670T00494 or 670T11944; and
Modification Summary 670T11508 or
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–29–
008, dated March 12, 2004, or Revision
A, dated May 5, 2004; as terminating
modification for the applicable
repetitive inspections. Therefore, we
have revised the applicability of this AD
to ‘‘exclud[e] those airplanes on which
Modification Summaries 670T00494 or
670T11944; and Modification Summary
670T11508 or Bombardier Service
Bulletin 670BA–29–008, dated March
12, 2004, or Revision A, dated May 5,
2004); has been incorporated in
production.’’
Request To Refer to Latest Revision of
Maintenance Requirement Manual
One commenter requests that
paragraph (f) of the proposed AD refer
to Revision 4, dated September 9, 2004,
of the general revisions of the
Maintenance Requirement Manual
instead of Bombardier CRJ 700/900
Series TR MRM2–129, dated June 1,
2004. The commenter states that TR
MRM2–129 was superseded by Revision
4 of the general revisions before
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35985-35987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12363]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 35985]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. 229, Special Condition 23-168-SC]
Special Conditions; Duncan Aviation Inc., EFIS on the Raytheon
300 King Air; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields
(HIRF)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Duncan Aviation Inc.,
15745 S Airport Rd Battle Creek, MI 49015, for a Supplemental Type
Certificate for the Raytheon 300 King Air. This airplane will have
novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of
technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. These
novel and unusual design features include the installation of an
electronic flight instrument system (EFIS). The EFIS consists of the
Universal Avionics, Inc. EFI-890R system for which the applicable
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness
standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high
intensity radiated fields (HIRF). The installation includes three EFI-
890R Flat Panel Displays (two Primary Flight Displays Pilot/Copilot and
one Navigational Displays Pilot), and supporting equipment. These
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these
airplanes.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is June 15, 2005.
Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk,
Docket No. 229, Room 506, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. All
comments must be marked: Docket No. CE229. Comments may be inspected in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m.
and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wes Ryan, AerospaceEngineer, Standards
Office (ACE-110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329-4127.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design
approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the
substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public
comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the
regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the
address specified above. All communications received on or before the
closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The
special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received.
All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for
examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing
date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their
comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. 229.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Background
Duncan Aviation made application to the FAA for a new Supplemental
Type Certificate for the Raytheon Model 300. The Raytheon Model 300 is
currently approved under TC No. A24CE. The proposed modification
incorporates a novel or unusual design features, such as a digital
Primary Flight Display, that may be vulnerable to HIRF external to the
airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, Sec. 21.101, Duncan
Aviation must show that the Raytheon Model 300 aircraft meets the
original certification basis for the airplane, as listed on Type Data
Sheet A24CE, additional certification requirements added for the
Universal Avionics EFI-890 system, exemptions, if any; and the special
conditions adopted by this rulemaking action. The rules that were
applied at Part 23 Amendment 54 for this STC include 23.1301, 23.1311,
23.1309, 23.1321, 23.1322, 23.1325, and 23.1543.
Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards
because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in Sec. 11.19, are
issued in accordance with Sec. 11.38 after public notice and become
part of the type certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the
provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Duncan Aviation plans to incorporate certain novel and unusual
design features into the Raytheon Model 300 airplane for which the
airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for
[[Page 35986]]
protection from the effects of HIRF. These features include EFIS, which
are susceptible to the HIRF environment, that were not envisaged by the
existing regulations for this type of airplane.
Protection of Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF):
Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in
aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that
perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due
to the use of sensitive solid-state advanced components in analog and
digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily
responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and
voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems
performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions.
Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation
that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed.
Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for
radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has
increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the
effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to
cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is
undefined.
The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane
design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level
of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures
against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design
and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels
in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of
operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio
frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane
be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the
electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external
threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are
believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be
exposed in the operating environment.
These special conditions require qualification of systems that
perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined
HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using
laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows:
(1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and
operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic
systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when
the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field strength (volts
per meter)
Frequency -------------------------
Peak Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 kHz-100 kHz................................ 50 50
100 kHz-500 kHz............................... 50 50
500 kHz-2 MHz................................. 50 50
2 MHz-30 MHz.................................. 100 100
30 MHz-70 MHz................................. 50 50
70 MHz-100 MHz................................ 50 50
100 MHz-200 MHz............................... 100 100
200 MHz-400 MHz............................... 100 100
400 MHz-700 MHz............................... 700 50
700 MHz-1 GHz................................. 700 100
1 GHz-2 GHz................................... 2000 200
2 GHz-4 GHz................................... 3000 200
4 GHz-6 GHz................................... 3000 200
6 GHz-8 GHz................................... 1000 200
8 GHz-12 GHz.................................. 3000 300
12 GHz-18 GHz................................. 2000 200
18 GHz-40 GHz................................. 600 200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square
(rms) values.
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis
that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical
functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter,
electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test
to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for
signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant
for approval by the FAA to identify either electrical or electronic
systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means
those functions, whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure
condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of
the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that
perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF
requirements. A system may perform both critical and non-critical
functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their
associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude,
altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to
critical functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests,
analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination
of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal
flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment.
Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a
means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally
insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be
exposed to the fields concurrently.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Raytheon Model 300. Should Duncan Aviation apply at a later date for a
supplemental type certificate to modify any other model on the same
type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well under
the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and
affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these
features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a
delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have
been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment
described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and
21.101; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
[[Page 35987]]
The Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Raytheon Model 300 airplane
modified by Duncan Aviation to add the Universal Avionics EFI-890
system.
1. Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system that performs critical
functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the operations,
and operational capabilities of these systems to perform critical
functions, are not adversely affected when the airplane is exposed to
high intensity radiated electromagnetic fields external to the
airplane.
2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would
contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on June 15, 2005.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12363 Filed 6-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P