Special Conditions; Duncan Aviation Inc., EFIS on the Raytheon 300 King Air; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF), 35985-35987 [05-12363]

Download as PDF 35985 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 119 Wednesday, June 22, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 23 [Docket No. 229, Special Condition 23–168– SC] Special Conditions; Duncan Aviation Inc., EFIS on the Raytheon 300 King Air; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Duncan Aviation Inc., 15745 S Airport Rd Battle Creek, MI 49015, for a Supplemental Type Certificate for the Raytheon 300 King Air. This airplane will have novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. These novel and unusual design features include the installation of an electronic flight instrument system (EFIS). The EFIS consists of the Universal Avionics, Inc. EFI–890R system for which the applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). The installation includes three EFI–890R Flat Panel Displays (two Primary Flight Displays Pilot/Copilot and one Navigational Displays Pilot), and supporting equipment. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these airplanes. DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is June 15, 2005. Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2005. VerDate jul<14>2003 15:52 Jun 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE–7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk, Docket No. 229, Room 506, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. All comments must be marked: Docket No. CE229. Comments may be inspected in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wes Ryan, AerospaceEngineer, Standards Office (ACE–110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329–4127. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making these special conditions effective upon issuance. ADDRESSES: Comments Invited Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the address specified above. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received. All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ‘‘Comments to Docket No. 229.’’ The postcard will be PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 date stamped and returned to the commenter. Background Duncan Aviation made application to the FAA for a new Supplemental Type Certificate for the Raytheon Model 300. The Raytheon Model 300 is currently approved under TC No. A24CE. The proposed modification incorporates a novel or unusual design features, such as a digital Primary Flight Display, that may be vulnerable to HIRF external to the airplane. Type Certification Basis Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, § 21.101, Duncan Aviation must show that the Raytheon Model 300 aircraft meets the original certification basis for the airplane, as listed on Type Data Sheet A24CE, additional certification requirements added for the Universal Avionics EFI–890 system, exemptions, if any; and the special conditions adopted by this rulemaking action. The rules that were applied at Part 23 Amendment 54 for this STC include 23.1301, 23.1311, 23.1309, 23.1321, 23.1322, 23.1325, and 23.1543. Discussion If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of § 21.16. Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in § 11.19, are issued in accordance with § 11.38 after public notice and become part of the type certification basis in accordance with § 21.101. Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the provisions of § 21.101. Novel or Unusual Design Features Duncan Aviation plans to incorporate certain novel and unusual design features into the Raytheon Model 300 airplane for which the airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM 22JNR1 35986 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations protection from the effects of HIRF. These features include EFIS, which are susceptible to the HIRF environment, that were not envisaged by the existing regulations for this type of airplane. Protection of Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF): Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due to the use of sensitive solid-state advanced components in analog and digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions. Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed. Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined. The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be exposed in the operating environment. These special conditions require qualification of systems that perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows: VerDate jul<14>2003 15:52 Jun 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 (1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below: Frequency Field strength (volts per meter) Peak 10 kHz–100 kHz 100 kHz–500 kHz ................ 500 kHz–2 MHz 2 MHz–30 MHz 30 MHz–70 MHz 70 MHz–100 MHz ............... 100 MHz–200 MHz ............... 200 MHz–400 MHz ............... 400 MHz–700 MHz ............... 700 MHz–1 GHz 1 GHz–2 GHz ... 2 GHz–4 GHz ... 4 GHz–6 GHz ... 6 GHz–8 GHz ... 8 GHz–12 GHz 12 GHz–18 GHz 18 GHz–40 GHz Average 50 50 50 50 100 50 50 50 100 50 50 100 100 700 700 2000 3000 3000 1000 3000 2000 600 100 200 200 200 200 300 200 200 or, (2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter, electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for signal attenuation due to installation. A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant for approval by the FAA to identify either electrical or electronic systems that perform critical functions. The term ‘‘critical’’ means those functions, whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF requirements. A system may perform both critical and non-critical functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude, altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to critical functions. Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests, analysis, Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Applicability As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the Raytheon Model 300. Should Duncan Aviation apply at a later date for a 50 supplemental type certificate to modify any other model on the same type 100 certificate to incorporate the same novel 100 or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as 50 well under the provisions of § 21.101. The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square (rms) values. PO 00000 models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be exposed to the fields concurrently. Conclusion This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplane. The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described above. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23 Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols. Citation The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19. E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM 22JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations action for the repetitive inspections, and repairing any crack. This AD is I Accordingly, pursuant to the authority prompted by reports of hydraulic delegated to me by the Administrator, pressure loss in either the number 1 or the following special conditions are number 2 hydraulic system due to issued as part of the type certification breakage or leakage of hydraulic lines in basis for the Raytheon Model 300 the aft equipment bay and reports of airplane modified by Duncan Aviation to cracks on the aft pressure bulkhead web add the Universal Avionics EFI–890 around these feed-through holes. We are system. issuing this AD to prevent loss of 1. Protection of Electrical and hydraulic pressure, which could result Electronic Systems from High Intensity in reduced controllability of the Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system airplane, and to detect and correct that performs critical functions must be cracks on the aft pressure bulkhead web, designed and installed to ensure that the which could result in reduced structural operations, and operational capabilities integrity of the aft pressure bulkhead. of these systems to perform critical DATES: This AD becomes effective July functions, are not adversely affected 27, 2005. when the airplane is exposed to high The incorporation by reference of a intensity radiated electromagnetic fields certain publication listed in the AD is external to the airplane. approved by the Director of the Federal 2. For the purpose of these special Register as of July 27, 2005. conditions, the following definition ADDRESSES: For service information applies: Critical Functions: Functions identified in this AD, contact whose failure would contribute to, or Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace cause, a failure condition that would Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station Centreprevent the continued safe flight and ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, landing of the airplane. Canada. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on June 15, Docket: The AD docket contains the 2005. proposed AD, comments, and any final John R. Colomy, disposition. You can examine the AD Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, docket on the Internet at https:// Aircraft Certification Service. dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket [FR Doc. 05–12363 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am] Management Facility office between 9 BILLING CODE 4910–13–P a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at Federal Aviation Administration the U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL–401, 14 CFR Part 39 Washington, DC. This docket number is [Docket No. FAA–2004–19754; Directorate FAA–2004–19754; the directorate Identifier 2004–NM–181–AD; Amendment identifier for this docket is 2004–NM– 39–14138; AD 2005–13–02] 181–AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RIN 2120–AA64 Serge Napoleon, Aerospace Engineer, Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE– Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet 171, FAA, New York Aircraft Series 700 & 701) Series Airplanes, and Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, New York Series 900) Series Airplanes 11590; telephone (516) 228–7312; fax (516) 794–5531. AGENCY: Federal Aviation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA Administration (FAA), Department of proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with Transportation (DOT). an AD for certain Bombardier Model ACTION: Final rule. CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet series 700 & 701) series airplanes, and Model CL– SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 600–2D24 (Regional Jet series 900) airworthiness directive (AD) for certain series airplanes. That action, published Bombardier Model CL–600–2C10 in the Federal Register on December 1, (Regional Jet series 700 & 701) series 2004 (69 FR 69842), proposed to require airplanes, and Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet series 900) series airplanes. revising the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions of Continued This AD requires revising the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Airworthiness by incorporating new Instructions of Continued Airworthiness repetitive inspections and an optional terminating action for the repetitive by incorporating new repetitive inspections and an optional terminating inspections, and repairing any crack. The Special Conditions VerDate jul<14>2003 15:52 Jun 21, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 35987 Comments We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been submitted on the proposed AD. Request To Remove Airplanes From the Applicability One commenter requests that certain airplane serial numbers be excluded from the applicability specified in paragraph (c) of the proposed AD. The commenter states that the inspection of the hydraulic tube adapters specified in Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series Temporary Revision (TR) MRM2–129, dated June 1, 2004 (referenced in the proposed AD as the appropriate source of service information), should be applicable to Bombardier Model CL– 600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700 & 701) series airplanes having serial numbers 10003 through 10099 inclusive, since Modification Summary 670T11944 was introduced in production at serial number 10100. The commenter also states the two remaining inspections of the bulkhead assembly and pylon pressure pan specified in TR MRM2–129 should be applicable to only airplanes having serial numbers 10003 through 10156 inclusive, since Modification Summary 670T11508 was incorporated in production at serial number 10157. We agree. Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series MRM2–129, dated June 1, 2004, identifies Modification Summaries 670T00494 or 670T11944; and Modification Summary 670T11508 or Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–29– 008, dated March 12, 2004, or Revision A, dated May 5, 2004; as terminating modification for the applicable repetitive inspections. Therefore, we have revised the applicability of this AD to ‘‘exclud[e] those airplanes on which Modification Summaries 670T00494 or 670T11944; and Modification Summary 670T11508 or Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–29–008, dated March 12, 2004, or Revision A, dated May 5, 2004); has been incorporated in production.’’ Request To Refer to Latest Revision of Maintenance Requirement Manual One commenter requests that paragraph (f) of the proposed AD refer to Revision 4, dated September 9, 2004, of the general revisions of the Maintenance Requirement Manual instead of Bombardier CRJ 700/900 Series TR MRM2–129, dated June 1, 2004. The commenter states that TR MRM2–129 was superseded by Revision 4 of the general revisions before E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM 22JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35985-35987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12363]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 35985]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 23

[Docket No. 229, Special Condition 23-168-SC]


Special Conditions; Duncan Aviation Inc., EFIS on the Raytheon 
300 King Air; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields 
(HIRF)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Duncan Aviation Inc., 
15745 S Airport Rd Battle Creek, MI 49015, for a Supplemental Type 
Certificate for the Raytheon 300 King Air. This airplane will have 
novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of 
technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. These 
novel and unusual design features include the installation of an 
electronic flight instrument system (EFIS). The EFIS consists of the 
Universal Avionics, Inc. EFI-890R system for which the applicable 
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness 
standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high 
intensity radiated fields (HIRF). The installation includes three EFI-
890R Flat Panel Displays (two Primary Flight Displays Pilot/Copilot and 
one Navigational Displays Pilot), and supporting equipment. These 
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the 
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety 
equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these 
airplanes.

DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is June 15, 2005. 
Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation 
Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk, 
Docket No. 229, Room 506, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. All 
comments must be marked: Docket No. CE229. Comments may be inspected in 
the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. 
and 4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wes Ryan, AerospaceEngineer, Standards 
Office (ACE-110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas 
City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329-4127.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and 
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because 
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design 
approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the 
substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public 
comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments 
received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making 
these special conditions effective upon issuance.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, 
or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the 
regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the 
address specified above. All communications received on or before the 
closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The 
special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received. 
All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for 
examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing 
date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact 
with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the 
docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their 
comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: 
``Comments to Docket No. 229.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
returned to the commenter.

Background

    Duncan Aviation made application to the FAA for a new Supplemental 
Type Certificate for the Raytheon Model 300. The Raytheon Model 300 is 
currently approved under TC No. A24CE. The proposed modification 
incorporates a novel or unusual design features, such as a digital 
Primary Flight Display, that may be vulnerable to HIRF external to the 
airplane.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, Sec.  21.101, Duncan 
Aviation must show that the Raytheon Model 300 aircraft meets the 
original certification basis for the airplane, as listed on Type Data 
Sheet A24CE, additional certification requirements added for the 
Universal Avionics EFI-890 system, exemptions, if any; and the special 
conditions adopted by this rulemaking action. The rules that were 
applied at Part 23 Amendment 54 for this STC include 23.1301, 23.1311, 
23.1309, 23.1321, 23.1322, 23.1325, and 23.1543.

Discussion

    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards 
because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special 
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in Sec.  11.19, are 
issued in accordance with Sec.  11.38 after public notice and become 
part of the type certification basis in accordance with Sec.  21.101.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type 
certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type 
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, 
the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the 
provisions of Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    Duncan Aviation plans to incorporate certain novel and unusual 
design features into the Raytheon Model 300 airplane for which the 
airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety 
standards for

[[Page 35986]]

protection from the effects of HIRF. These features include EFIS, which 
are susceptible to the HIRF environment, that were not envisaged by the 
existing regulations for this type of airplane.
    Protection of Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF): 
Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in 
aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that 
perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due 
to the use of sensitive solid-state advanced components in analog and 
digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily 
responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and 
voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems 
performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions.
    Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation 
that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed. 
Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for 
radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has 
increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the 
effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to 
cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is 
undefined.
    The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane 
design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level 
of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the 
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures 
against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design 
and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels 
in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of 
operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio 
frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane 
be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the 
electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external 
threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are 
believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be 
exposed in the operating environment.
    These special conditions require qualification of systems that 
perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined 
HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using 
laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows:
    (1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and 
operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic 
systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when 
the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Field strength  (volts
                                                       per meter)
                   Frequency                   -------------------------
                                                    Peak       Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 kHz-100 kHz................................           50           50
100 kHz-500 kHz...............................           50           50
500 kHz-2 MHz.................................           50           50
2 MHz-30 MHz..................................          100          100
30 MHz-70 MHz.................................           50           50
70 MHz-100 MHz................................           50           50
100 MHz-200 MHz...............................          100          100
200 MHz-400 MHz...............................          100          100
400 MHz-700 MHz...............................          700           50
700 MHz-1 GHz.................................          700          100
1 GHz-2 GHz...................................         2000          200
2 GHz-4 GHz...................................         3000          200
4 GHz-6 GHz...................................         3000          200
6 GHz-8 GHz...................................         1000          200
8 GHz-12 GHz..................................         3000          300
12 GHz-18 GHz.................................         2000          200
18 GHz-40 GHz.................................          600          200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square
  (rms) values.

or,
    (2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis 
that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical 
functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter, 
electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test 
to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for 
signal attenuation due to installation.
    A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant 
for approval by the FAA to identify either electrical or electronic 
systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means 
those functions, whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure 
condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of 
the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that 
perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF 
requirements. A system may perform both critical and non-critical 
functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their 
associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude, 
altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to 
critical functions.
    Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests, 
analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination 
of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal 
flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment. 
Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a 
means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally 
insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be 
exposed to the fields concurrently.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the 
Raytheon Model 300. Should Duncan Aviation apply at a later date for a 
supplemental type certificate to modify any other model on the same 
type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design 
feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well under 
the provisions of Sec.  21.101.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features 
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and 
affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these 
features on the airplane.
    The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the 
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been 
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is 
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change 
from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a 
delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane, 
which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and 
comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for 
adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting 
comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have 
been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment 
described above.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.

Citation

0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 
21.101; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.

[[Page 35987]]

The Special Conditions

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of 
the type certification basis for the Raytheon Model 300 airplane 
modified by Duncan Aviation to add the Universal Avionics EFI-890 
system.
    1. Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High 
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system that performs critical 
functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the operations, 
and operational capabilities of these systems to perform critical 
functions, are not adversely affected when the airplane is exposed to 
high intensity radiated electromagnetic fields external to the 
airplane.
    2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following 
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would 
contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the 
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on June 15, 2005.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12363 Filed 6-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.