Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330 and A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 Series Airplanes, 36078-36081 [05-12303]
Download as PDF
36078
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600
flight hours or 2,000 water drops, whichever
occurs first.
(2) For airplanes on which the ultrasonic
inspection required by paragraph (a) of AD
98–04–08 has not been done before the
effective date of this AD: After accomplishing
the initial ultrasonic inspection specified in
paragraph (f) of this AD, repeat the ultrasonic
inspection specified in paragraph (f) of this
AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600
flight hours or 2,000 water drops, whichever
occurs first.
New Requirements of This AD
New Ultrasonic Inspection
(i) At the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD, do an
ultrasonic inspection for cracks of the wing
lower skin, in accordance with Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin 215–A454, Revision 3,
dated March 13, 2001. Thereafter, do the
ultrasonic inspection for cracks of the wing
lower skin at the times specified for the
ultrasonic inspection in paragraph (h) of this
AD.
(1) Within 50 flight hours or 150 water
drops after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first.
(2) Before further flight after accomplishing
the first ultrasonic inspection required by
paragraph (f) or (h) of this AD after the
effective date of this AD.
Cracking Detected
(j) If any cracking is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (f), (h), or
(i) of this AD, before further flight,
accomplish paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this
AD.
(1) Rework the lower cap of the front or
rear spar, as applicable, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–A463,
Revision 2, dated March 13, 2001 (for the
front spar); and Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin 215–A454, Revision 3, dated March
13, 2001 (for the rear spar).
(2) After doing the rework specified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, do a general
visual inspection, from inside the wing box,
to detect cracks of the front spar web or rear
spar web, as applicable, and the lower skin
area, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Alert Service Bulletin 215–A463, Revision 2,
dated March 13, 2001 (for the front spar); and
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–A454,
Revision 3, dated March 13, 2001 (for the rear
spar). If any cracking is detected, before
further flight, repair in accordance with a
method approved by the Manager, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or
its delegated agent).
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:16 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Actions Accomplished According to Previous
Issues of the Service Bulletins
[Docket No. 2003–NM–211–AD]
(k) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
Canadair Alert Service Bulletin 215–A463,
dated April 8, 1993; Canadair Alert Service
Bulletin 215–A463, Revision 1, dated May
25, 1995; Canadair Alert Service Bulletin
215–A454, dated October 13, 1993; Canadair
Alert Service Bulletin 215–A454, Revision 1,
dated May 25, 1995; and Canadair Alert
Service Bulletin 215–A454, Revision 2, dated
January 27, 1999; are considered acceptable
for compliance with the corresponding
actions specified in this AD.
Actions Accomplished According to Alert
Wire
(l) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
Bombardier Alert Wire 215–A454, dated
December 23, 1992; and Bombardier Alert
Wire 215–A463, dated March 26, 1993; are
considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding actions specified in this
AD.
Reporting Requirement
(m) For any inspection required by this AD
that is accomplished after the effective date
of this AD, within 30 days after
accomplishing the inspection, submit a
report of any inspection results (both positive
and negative findings) to Bombardier, Inc.,
Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087,
Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C
3G9, Canada. Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements contained in this AD,
and assigned OMB Control Number 2120–
0056.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(n) The Manager, New York ACO, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested in accordance with the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(o) Canadian airworthiness directives CF–
1992–26R1, dated September 24, 2002, and
CF–1993–07R1, dated September 25, 2002,
also address the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14,
2005.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12302 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330 and A340–200, –300, –500, and
–600 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document revises an
earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to all Airbus Model
A330 and A340–200, –300, –500, and
–600 series airplanes. That action would
have required a one-time inspection of
each emergency evacuation slide raft
installed on Type ‘‘A’’ exit doors
equipped with regulator valves having a
certain part number to determine if a
discrepant regulator valve is installed
on the pressure bottle that inflates the
slide/raft, and an interim modification
of any discrepant valve if necessary.
That action also would have required
eventual modification of all affected
regulator valves, which would have
terminated the requirements of the
proposed AD. This new action revises
the original NPRM by requiring part
number identification and a new
modification for affected airplanes,
removing the one-time inspection and
interim modification, and removing
certain airplanes from the applicability.
The actions specified by this new
proposed AD are intended to prevent
failure of an emergency evacuation slide
raft to deploy and inflate during an
emergency situation, which could
impede an evacuation and result in
injury to passengers or crewmembers.
This action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, ANM–114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003–NM–
211–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055–4056.
Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Comments may be submitted
via fax to (425) 227–1232. Comments
may also be sent via the Internet using
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the following address: 9-anmnprmcomment@faa.gov. Comments sent
via fax or the Internet must contain
‘‘Docket No. 2003–NM–211–AD’’ in the
subject line and need not be submitted
in triplicate. Comments sent via the
Internet as attached electronic files must
be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 or
2000 or ASCII text.
The service information referenced in
the proposed rule may be obtained from
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box
3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
This information may be examined at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer, ANM–
116, International Branch, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2797;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such
written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall
identify the Rules Docket number and
be submitted in triplicate to the address
specified above. All communications
received on or before the closing date
for comments, specified above, will be
considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained
in this action may be changed in light
of the comments received.
Submit comments using the following
format:
• Organize comments issue-by-issue.
For example, discuss a request to
change the compliance time and a
request to change the service bulletin
reference as two separate issues.
• For each issue, state what specific
change to the proposed AD is being
requested.
• Include justification (e.g., reasons or
data) for each request.
Comments are specifically invited on
the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed rule. All comments
submitted will be available, both before
and after the closing date for comments,
in the Rules Docket for examination by
interested persons. A report
summarizing each FAA-public contact
concerned with the substance of this
proposal will be filed in the Rules
Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this action
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:16 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
36079
must submit a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket Number 2003–NM–211–AD.’’
The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
applicability specified in airworthiness
directive 2003–213(B) R1 to airplanes
with slide rafts and slides fitted on Type
A passenger/crew doors and Type 1
emergency doors having certain part
numbers.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this
NPRM by submitting a request to the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
ANM–114, Attention: Rules Docket No.
2003–NM–211–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056.
Explanation of New Relevant Service
Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletins
A330–25–3225, Revision 01 (for Model
A330 series airplanes); and A340–25–
4228, Revision 01 (for Model A340–200
and –300 series airplanes); both dated
September 30, 2004; and A340–25–5054
(for Model A340–500 and –600 series
airplanes), dated August 2, 2004. The
service bulletins describe procedures for
modification of the regulator valves of
the slide and slide raft assemblies.
Accomplishing the modification
eliminates the need for the one-time
inspection that would have been
required by the original NPRM. The
service bulletins reference Goodrich
Service Bulletins 25A341, Revision 1,
dated May 21, 2003; and 25–347,
Revision 1, dated August 30, 2004; as
additional sources of service
information for accomplishing the
modification of the regulator valves.
Service Bulletin A340–25–4228,
Revision 01, recommends concurrent
accomplishment of Airbus Service
Bulletin A340–25–4152, dated August 7,
2001; and Service Bulletin A330–25–
3225, Revision 01, recommends
concurrent accomplishment of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–25–3126, dated
August 7, 2001.
Discussion
A proposal to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
part 39) to add an airworthiness
directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus
Model A330–200 and –300 and A340–
200, –300, –500, and –600 series
airplanes, was published as a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (hereafter
referred to as the ‘‘original NPRM’’) in
the Federal Register on April 22, 2004
(69 FR 21774). The original NPRM
would have required a one-time
inspection of each emergency
evacuation slide raft installed on Type
‘‘A’’ exit doors equipped with regulator
valves having a certain part number, to
determine if a discrepant regulator valve
is installed on the pressure bottle that
inflates the slide/raft, and an interim
modification of any discrepant valve.
The original NPRM also would have
required eventual modification of all
affected regulator valves, which would
terminate the requirements of the AD.
The original NPRM was prompted by inservice maintenance testing of the
emergency escape slides on Type ‘‘A’’
exit doors, which resulted in failure of
the slides to automatically deploy. That
condition, if not corrected, could result
in failure of an emergency evacuation
slide raft to deploy and inflate during an
emergency situation, which could
impede an evacuation and result in
injury to passengers or crewmembers.
Actions Since Issuance of Original
NPRM
Since the issuance of the original
´ ´
NPRM, the Direction Generale de
l’Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
issued French airworthiness directive
2003–213(B) R2, dated July 3, 2004.
That airworthiness directive cancels the
requirements in French airworthiness
directive 2003–213(B) R1, is replaced by
another French airworthiness directive
issued by the DGAG: F–2004–094 R1,
dated February 16, 2005. Airworthiness
directive F–2004–094 R1 mandates a
new modification of the Vespel piston
of the regulator valve, and limits the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Other Relevant Rulemaking
This proposed AD is related to AD
2003–03–06, amendment 39–13030 (68
FR 4378, January 29, 2003). That AD
references Airbus Service Bulletins
A340–25–4152, dated August 7, 2001;
and A330–25–3126, dated August 7,
2001; for modifying the escape slides/
slide rafts on the passenger/crew doors
and the emergency exit doors. That AD
is applicable to Airbus Model A330 and
A340 series airplanes and requires a
one-time inspection of the rail release
pins and parachute pins of the escape
slide/raft pack assembly for correct
installation; corrective actions if
necessary; and modification of the
escape slides/slide rafts on the
passenger, crew, and emergency exit
doors.
Conclusion
Since certain changes discussed above
expand the scope of the originally
proposed rule, we have determined that
it is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional
opportunity for public comment.
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
36080
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Comments
Comments were submitted on the
original NPRM. Due to the release of
new service information, those
comments are no longer applicable and
are not addressed by this supplemental
NPRM.
Differences Among Supplemental
NPRM, French Airworthiness Directive,
and Service Information
The effectivity of the French
airworthiness directive includes only
airplanes that have emergency slides or
slide rafts having certain part numbers
and fitted on certain door types and
locations. This proposed AD would
apply to all airplanes of the affected
models, and would require determining
if slides or slide rafts having the part
numbers specified in the French
airworthiness directive are installed.
(No further action would be required if
no slides or slide rafts having the
subject part numbers are installed.) We
find that it is necessary to expand the
applicability to ensure that the
modification that would be required by
this proposed AD is performed if slides
or slide rafts having an affected part
number are installed in the future.
Service Bulletin A340–25–4228,
Revision 01, recommends concurrent
accomplishment of Airbus Service
Bulletin A340–25–4152, dated August 7,
2001; and Service Bulletin A330–25–
3225, Revision 01, recommends
concurrent accomplishment of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–25–3126, dated
August 7, 2001. However, consistent
with French airworthiness directive F–
2004–094 R1, dated February 16, 2004,
this proposed AD would not require
accomplishing those service bulletins.
Those service bulletins currently are
referenced for accomplishing the actions
required by AD 2003–03–06, described
previously.
Cost Impact
We estimate that 17 Model A330
series airplanes of U.S. registry would
be affected by this proposed AD.
It would take about 1 work hour to
accomplish the proposed parts
identification, at an average labor rate of
$65 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the proposed
parts identification on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $1,105, or $65 per
airplane.
It would take about 13 work hours per
slide (8 slides per airplane) to
accomplish the proposed modification,
at an average labor rate of $65 per work
hour. Required parts would be provided
by the manufacturer at no cost to
operators. Based on these figures, the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:16 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
cost impact of the proposed
modification on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $114,920, or $6,760 per
airplane.
Currently, there are no affected A340–
200, –300, –500, and –600 series
airplanes on the U.S. Register. However,
if an affected airplane is imported and
placed on the U.S. Register in the future,
the proposed parts identification would
take about 1 work hour, and the
proposed modification would take about
104 work hours, at an average labor rate
of $65 per work hour. Required parts
would be provided by the manufacturer
at no cost to operators. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed parts identification to be $65
per airplane, and the proposed
modification to be $6,760 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed
above are based on assumptions that no
operator has yet accomplished any of
the proposed requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would
accomplish those actions in the future if
this AD were not adopted. The cost
impact figures discussed in AD
rulemaking actions represent only the
time necessary to perform the specific
actions actually required by the AD.
These figures typically do not include
incidental costs, such as the time
required to gain access and close up,
planning time, or time necessitated by
other administrative actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
various levels of government. Therefore,
it is determined that this proposal
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this proposed regulation (1)
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it may be obtained by
contacting the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend part
39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
Airbus: Docket 2003–NM–211–AD.
Applicability: Model A330 and A340–200,
–300, –500, and –600 series airplanes;
certificated in any category; except Model
A330 and A340–200 and –300 series
airplanes on which Airbus Modifications
52708 and 52811 were done during
production, and Model A340–500 and –600
series airplanes on which Airbus
Modification 52708 was done during
production, and on which no slide or slide
raft has been removed since delivery from the
manufacturer.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent failure of an emergency
evacuation slide raft to deploy and inflate
during an emergency situation, which could
impede an evacuation and result in injury to
passengers or crewmembers, accomplish the
following:
Service Information References
(a) The following information pertains to
the service information referenced in this
AD:
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(1) The term ‘‘service bulletin’’ as used in
this AD, means the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletins
A330–25–3225, Revision 01 (for Model A330
series airplanes), and A340–25–4228,
Revision 01 (for Model A340–200 and -300
series airplanes), both dated September 30,
2004; and A340–25–5054 (for Model A340–
500 and -600 series airplanes), dated August
2, 2004.
(2) The service bulletins refer to Goodrich
Service Bulletins 25A341, Revision 1, dated
May 21, 2003; and 25–347, Revision 1, dated
August 30, 2004; as additional sources of
service information for accomplishment of
the modification specified in the service
bulletins.
(3) Accomplishing the modification before
the effective date of this AD in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A330–25–3225
or A340–25–4228, both dated August 2, 2004;
is considered acceptable for compliance with
the modification required by this AD.
Part Number Identification/Modification
(b) Within 18 months after the effective
date of this AD: Determine the part number
of the emergency slides or slide rafts fitted
on the door types and locations listed in
Table 1 of this AD. If no affected slides or
slide rafts are found installed on the airplane,
then no further action is required by this
paragraph. If any affected slides or slide rafts
are found installed on the airplane: Modify
36081
the regulator valves of the slide and slide raft
assemblies at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD, in
accordance with the applicable service
bulletin.
(1) For airplanes on which the regulator
valves have not been modified as of the
effective date of this AD per Goodrich
Service Bulletin 25A341, Revision 1, dated
May 21, 2003: Before further flight.
(2) For airplanes on which the regulator
valves have been modified as of the effective
date of this AD per Goodrich Service Bulletin
25A341, Revision 1, dated May 21, 2003:
Within 18 months after the effective date of
this AD.
TABLE 1.—PART NUMBERS
Door type
A
A
A
A
Door location
...............
...............
...............
...............
1 and 4, LH and RH ...........
2, LH ...................................
2, RH ..................................
3, LH ...................................
A ...............
3, RH ..................................
1 ...............
1 ...............
1 ...............
3, LH and RH .....................
3, LH ...................................
3, RH ..................................
Goodrich slide/slide raft part number
7A1508–001, -003,
7A1539–001, -003,
7A1539–002, -004,
7A1510–001, -003,
4A3934–1, -3
7A1510–002, -004,
4A3934–2, -4
7A1509–001, -003,
4A3928–1
4A3928–2
Parts Installation
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, is
authorized to approve alternative methods of
compliance for this AD.
Note 1: The subject of this AD is addressed
in French airworthiness directives F–2003–
213(B) R2, dated July 3, 2004, and F–2004–
094 R1, dated February 16, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14,
2005.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12303 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
16:16 Jun 21, 2005
-006, -008, -014, -016, -018, -102, -104, -106, -108, -110, -114, -116, or -118; or
-005, -007, -013, -015, -017, -101, -103, -105, -107, -109, -113, -115, or -117
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(c) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a regulator valve having
a part number listed in the old part number
column specified in Paragraph 1.L. of the
applicable service bulletin on any airplane,
unless that regulator valve has been modified
in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.
VerDate jul<14>2003
-005, -007, -013, -015, -017, -101, -103, -105, -107, -109, -113, -115, or -117
-005, -007, -013, -015, -017, -101, -103, -105, -107, -109, -113, -115, or -117
-006, -008, -014, -016, -018, -102, -104, -106, -108, -110, -114, -116, or -118
-005, -007, -013, -015, -017, -101, -103, -105, -107, -109, -113, -115, or -117; or
Jkt 205001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2004–NM–36–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–135BJ and
EMB–145XR Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document revises an
earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain EMBRAER
Model EMB–135BJ and EMB–145XR
series airplanes, that would have
required installation of an additional
indication device to the clear-ice
indication system. This new action
revises the proposed rule by changing
the description of the unsafe condition,
and by adding instructions for
modifying certain existing circuits,
replacing an existing indicator lamp
with a new, improved lamp, and
performing other required corrections/
modifications. The actions specified by
this new proposed AD are intended to
prevent undetected build-up of clear ice
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on the wing surfaces, which could lead
to reduced controllability of the
airplane. This action is intended to
address the identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport
Airplane Directorate, ANM–114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2004–NM–
36–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055–4056.
Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be
submitted via fax to (425) 227–1232.
Comments may also be sent via the
Internet using the following address: 9anm-nprmcomment@faa.gov. Comments
sent via fax or the Internet must contain
‘‘Docket No. 2004–NM–36–AD’’ in the
subject line and need not be submitted
in triplicate. Comments sent via the
Internet as attached electronic files must
be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 or
2000 or ASCII text.
The service information referenced in
the proposed rule may be obtained from
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER), P.O. Box 343—CEP 12.225,
Sao Jose dos Campos—SP, Brazil. This
information may be examined at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36078-36081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12303]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NM-211-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330 and A340-200, -300, -
500, and -600 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of
comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document revises an earlier proposed airworthiness
directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus Model A330 and A340-200, -300,
-500, and -600 series airplanes. That action would have required a one-
time inspection of each emergency evacuation slide raft installed on
Type ``A'' exit doors equipped with regulator valves having a certain
part number to determine if a discrepant regulator valve is installed
on the pressure bottle that inflates the slide/raft, and an interim
modification of any discrepant valve if necessary. That action also
would have required eventual modification of all affected regulator
valves, which would have terminated the requirements of the proposed
AD. This new action revises the original NPRM by requiring part number
identification and a new modification for affected airplanes, removing
the one-time inspection and interim modification, and removing certain
airplanes from the applicability. The actions specified by this new
proposed AD are intended to prevent failure of an emergency evacuation
slide raft to deploy and inflate during an emergency situation, which
could impede an evacuation and result in injury to passengers or
crewmembers. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003-NM-211-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using
[[Page 36079]]
the following address: 9-anm-nprmcomment@faa.gov. Comments sent via fax
or the Internet must contain ``Docket No. 2003-NM-211-AD'' in the
subject line and need not be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via
the Internet as attached electronic files must be formatted in
Microsoft Word 97 or 2000 or ASCII text.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, ANM-
116, International Branch, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-
2797; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this action may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Submit comments using the following format:
Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed
AD is being requested.
Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this action must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2003-NM-211-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped
and returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 2003-NM-211-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) to add an airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all
Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 and A340-200, -300, -500, and -600
series airplanes, was published as a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) (hereafter referred to as the ``original NPRM'') in the Federal
Register on April 22, 2004 (69 FR 21774). The original NPRM would have
required a one-time inspection of each emergency evacuation slide raft
installed on Type ``A'' exit doors equipped with regulator valves
having a certain part number, to determine if a discrepant regulator
valve is installed on the pressure bottle that inflates the slide/raft,
and an interim modification of any discrepant valve. The original NPRM
also would have required eventual modification of all affected
regulator valves, which would terminate the requirements of the AD. The
original NPRM was prompted by in-service maintenance testing of the
emergency escape slides on Type ``A'' exit doors, which resulted in
failure of the slides to automatically deploy. That condition, if not
corrected, could result in failure of an emergency evacuation slide
raft to deploy and inflate during an emergency situation, which could
impede an evacuation and result in injury to passengers or crewmembers.
Actions Since Issuance of Original NPRM
Since the issuance of the original NPRM, the Direction Generale de
l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for
France, issued French airworthiness directive 2003-213(B) R2, dated
July 3, 2004. That airworthiness directive cancels the requirements in
French airworthiness directive 2003-213(B) R1, is replaced by another
French airworthiness directive issued by the DGAG: F-2004-094 R1, dated
February 16, 2005. Airworthiness directive F-2004-094 R1 mandates a new
modification of the Vespel piston of the regulator valve, and limits
the applicability specified in airworthiness directive 2003-213(B) R1
to airplanes with slide rafts and slides fitted on Type A passenger/
crew doors and Type 1 emergency doors having certain part numbers.
Explanation of New Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletins A330-25-3225, Revision 01 (for
Model A330 series airplanes); and A340-25-4228, Revision 01 (for Model
A340-200 and -300 series airplanes); both dated September 30, 2004; and
A340-25-5054 (for Model A340-500 and -600 series airplanes), dated
August 2, 2004. The service bulletins describe procedures for
modification of the regulator valves of the slide and slide raft
assemblies. Accomplishing the modification eliminates the need for the
one-time inspection that would have been required by the original NPRM.
The service bulletins reference Goodrich Service Bulletins 25A341,
Revision 1, dated May 21, 2003; and 25-347, Revision 1, dated August
30, 2004; as additional sources of service information for
accomplishing the modification of the regulator valves. Service
Bulletin A340-25-4228, Revision 01, recommends concurrent
accomplishment of Airbus Service Bulletin A340-25-4152, dated August 7,
2001; and Service Bulletin A330-25-3225, Revision 01, recommends
concurrent accomplishment of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-25-3126,
dated August 7, 2001.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
This proposed AD is related to AD 2003-03-06, amendment 39-13030
(68 FR 4378, January 29, 2003). That AD references Airbus Service
Bulletins A340-25-4152, dated August 7, 2001; and A330-25-3126, dated
August 7, 2001; for modifying the escape slides/slide rafts on the
passenger/crew doors and the emergency exit doors. That AD is
applicable to Airbus Model A330 and A340 series airplanes and requires
a one-time inspection of the rail release pins and parachute pins of
the escape slide/raft pack assembly for correct installation;
corrective actions if necessary; and modification of the escape slides/
slide rafts on the passenger, crew, and emergency exit doors.
Conclusion
Since certain changes discussed above expand the scope of the
originally proposed rule, we have determined that it is necessary to
reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for public
comment.
[[Page 36080]]
Comments
Comments were submitted on the original NPRM. Due to the release of
new service information, those comments are no longer applicable and
are not addressed by this supplemental NPRM.
Differences Among Supplemental NPRM, French Airworthiness Directive,
and Service Information
The effectivity of the French airworthiness directive includes only
airplanes that have emergency slides or slide rafts having certain part
numbers and fitted on certain door types and locations. This proposed
AD would apply to all airplanes of the affected models, and would
require determining if slides or slide rafts having the part numbers
specified in the French airworthiness directive are installed. (No
further action would be required if no slides or slide rafts having the
subject part numbers are installed.) We find that it is necessary to
expand the applicability to ensure that the modification that would be
required by this proposed AD is performed if slides or slide rafts
having an affected part number are installed in the future.
Service Bulletin A340-25-4228, Revision 01, recommends concurrent
accomplishment of Airbus Service Bulletin A340-25-4152, dated August 7,
2001; and Service Bulletin A330-25-3225, Revision 01, recommends
concurrent accomplishment of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-25-3126,
dated August 7, 2001. However, consistent with French airworthiness
directive F-2004-094 R1, dated February 16, 2004, this proposed AD
would not require accomplishing those service bulletins. Those service
bulletins currently are referenced for accomplishing the actions
required by AD 2003-03-06, described previously.
Cost Impact
We estimate that 17 Model A330 series airplanes of U.S. registry
would be affected by this proposed AD.
It would take about 1 work hour to accomplish the proposed parts
identification, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the cost impact of the proposed parts identification on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,105, or $65 per airplane.
It would take about 13 work hours per slide (8 slides per airplane)
to accomplish the proposed modification, at an average labor rate of
$65 per work hour. Required parts would be provided by the manufacturer
at no cost to operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
proposed modification on U.S. operators is estimated to be $114,920, or
$6,760 per airplane.
Currently, there are no affected A340-200, -300, -500, and -600
series airplanes on the U.S. Register. However, if an affected airplane
is imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future, the proposed
parts identification would take about 1 work hour, and the proposed
modification would take about 104 work hours, at an average labor rate
of $65 per work hour. Required parts would be provided by the
manufacturer at no cost to operators. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed parts identification to be $65 per
airplane, and the proposed modification to be $6,760 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements
of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions
in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures
discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to
perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Airbus: Docket 2003-NM-211-AD.
Applicability: Model A330 and A340-200, -300, -500, and -600
series airplanes; certificated in any category; except Model A330
and A340-200 and -300 series airplanes on which Airbus Modifications
52708 and 52811 were done during production, and Model A340-500 and
-600 series airplanes on which Airbus Modification 52708 was done
during production, and on which no slide or slide raft has been
removed since delivery from the manufacturer.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of an emergency evacuation slide raft to
deploy and inflate during an emergency situation, which could impede
an evacuation and result in injury to passengers or crewmembers,
accomplish the following:
Service Information References
(a) The following information pertains to the service
information referenced in this AD:
[[Page 36081]]
(1) The term ``service bulletin'' as used in this AD, means the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletins A330-25-
3225, Revision 01 (for Model A330 series airplanes), and A340-25-
4228, Revision 01 (for Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes),
both dated September 30, 2004; and A340-25-5054 (for Model A340-500
and -600 series airplanes), dated August 2, 2004.
(2) The service bulletins refer to Goodrich Service Bulletins
25A341, Revision 1, dated May 21, 2003; and 25-347, Revision 1,
dated August 30, 2004; as additional sources of service information
for accomplishment of the modification specified in the service
bulletins.
(3) Accomplishing the modification before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-25-3225 or
A340-25-4228, both dated August 2, 2004; is considered acceptable
for compliance with the modification required by this AD.
Part Number Identification/Modification
(b) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD:
Determine the part number of the emergency slides or slide rafts
fitted on the door types and locations listed in Table 1 of this AD.
If no affected slides or slide rafts are found installed on the
airplane, then no further action is required by this paragraph. If
any affected slides or slide rafts are found installed on the
airplane: Modify the regulator valves of the slide and slide raft
assemblies at the applicable time specified in paragraph (b)(1) or
(b)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin.
(1) For airplanes on which the regulator valves have not been
modified as of the effective date of this AD per Goodrich Service
Bulletin 25A341, Revision 1, dated May 21, 2003: Before further
flight.
(2) For airplanes on which the regulator valves have been
modified as of the effective date of this AD per Goodrich Service
Bulletin 25A341, Revision 1, dated May 21, 2003: Within 18 months
after the effective date of this AD.
Table 1.--Part Numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodrich slide/slide
Door type Door location raft part number
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A............. 1 and 4, LH and RH................ 7A1508-001, -003, -
005, -007, -013, -
015, -017, -101, -
103, -105, -107, -
109, -113, -115, or
-117
A............. 2, LH............................. 7A1539-001, -003, -
005, -007, -013, -
015, -017, -101, -
103, -105, -107, -
109, -113, -115, or
-117
A............. 2, RH............................. 7A1539-002, -004, -
006, -008, -014, -
016, -018, -102, -
104, -106, -108, -
110, -114, -116, or
-118
A............. 3, LH............................. 7A1510-001, -003, -
005, -007, -013, -
015, -017, -101, -
103, -105, -107, -
109, -113, -115, or
-117; or 4A3934-1,
3
A............. 3, RH............................. 7A1510-002, -004, -
006, -008, -014, -
016, -018, -102, -
104, -106, -108, -
110, -114, -116, or
-118; or 4A3934-2,
4
1............. 3, LH and RH...................... 7A1509-001, -003, -
005, -007, -013, -
015, -017, -101, -
103, -105, -107, -
109, -113, -115, or
-117
1............. 3, LH............................. 4A3928-1
1............. 3, RH............................. 4A3928-2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts Installation
(c) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
regulator valve having a part number listed in the old part number
column specified in Paragraph 1.L. of the applicable service
bulletin on any airplane, unless that regulator valve has been
modified in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, is authorized
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Note 1: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directives F-2003-213(B) R2, dated July 3, 2004, and
F-2004-094 R1, dated February 16, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14, 2005.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12303 Filed 6-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P