Methow Valley Ranger District, Okanogan & Wenatchee National Forests, WA, Pack Stock Outfitter Guide Special Use Permits Environmental Impact Statement, 36112-36114 [05-12290]
Download as PDF
36112
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Notices
Dated: June 16, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12255 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket Number FV–05–302]
United States Standards for Grades of
Snap Beans
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is withdrawing the
notice soliciting comments on its
proposal to amend the voluntary United
States Standards for Grades of Snap
Beans. After reviewing and considering
the comments received, the Agency has
decided not to proceed with this action.
DATES: Effective Date: June 22, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Priester, Standardization Section,
Fresh Products Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Room 1661 South
Building, STOP 0240, Washington, DC
20250–0240, Fax (202) 720–8871 or call
(202) 720–2185; E-mail
David.Priester@usda.gov. The United
States Standards for Grades of Snap
Beans are available either through the
address cited above or by accessing the
Fresh Products Branch Web site at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/standards/
stanfrfv.htm.
Background
At a 2003 meeting with the Fruit and
Vegetable Industry Advisory Committee,
AMS was asked to review all the fresh
fruit and vegetable grade standards for
their usefulness in serving the industry.
AMS had identified the United States
Standards for Grades of Snap Beans for
a possible revision. The United States
Standards for Grades of Snap Beans
were last amended July 5, 1990.
On March 11, 2005, a notice
requesting comments on the possible
revision of the standards by allowing
percentages to be determined by count
and not weight as well as other changes
was published in the Federal Register
(70 FR 12175) with the comment period
ending May 10, 2005.
Three comments were received during
the official period for comment. One
comment from an industry member
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:12 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
supported the proposed revision. Two
comments from industry groups did not
support revising the standard. Both of
the comments not supporting the
revision noted concerns over the
accuracy or representative nature of a
count-based inspection. The industry
groups also noted that size variation of
the individual bean as well as foreign
material or debris in the sample could
affect the inspection in a different
manner if inspected on a count and not
a weight basis. In view of the concerns
from the industry, the proposed changes
are not warranted at this time, thus the
notice is being withdrawn. This
withdrawal will provide industry
representatives with an opportunity for
further discussions in the areas of
concern.
After reviewing and considering the
comments received, the Agency has
decided not to proceed with the action.
Therefore, the notice published March
11, 2005, (70 FR 12172) is withdrawn.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: June 16, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12256 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Methow Valley Ranger District,
Okanogan & Wenatchee National
Forests, WA, Pack Stock Outfitter
Guide Special Use Permits
Environmental Impact Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the USDA, Forest Service will prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement that
will evaluate alternatives to provide
pack stock outfitter and guide services
on the Methow Valley, Chelan and
Tonasket Ranger Districts of the
Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests. The proposed action is to issue
ten-year, pack stock outfitter and guide
special use permits to nine companies
to operate on these three Districts. A
maximum of 4,900 client days will be
shared between these companies.
Outfitting and guiding would take place
both in the Lake Chelan-Sawtooth and
Pasayten Wildernesses, and outside of
wilderness.
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by July
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15, 2005. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected December
2005 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected May 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Jennifer Zbyszewski, Recreation &
Wilderness Program Manager, Methow
Valley Ranger District, 24 W. Chewuch
Rd., Winthrop WA 98862, or by e-mail
to jzbyszewski@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions to Jennifer Zbyszewski,
Recreation & Wilderness Program,
Manager, Methow Valley Ranger
District, 24 W. Chewuch Rd., Winthrop
WA 98862, (509) 996–4021, or by e-mail
to jzbyszewski@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purposed and Need for Action
Nine companies have applied to the
Forest Service for ten year permits to
outfit and guide on the Methow Valley,
Chelan and/or Tonasket Ranger District
of the Okanogan and Wenatchee
National Forests. North Cascade Safari,
Cascade Wilderness Outfitters, North
Cascade Outfitters, Rocking Horse
Ranch, and Backcountry Burros have
operated under five-year term special
use permits in the past, but these
permits expired in 2000. The companies
have been operating under short-term
permits since then. Each of these
companies have operated for at least 20
years on the Okanogan and Wenatchee
National Forests. Deli-Llamas and
Pasayten Llamas have operated under
short-term permits since 1993. Sawtooth
Outfitters has operated under short-term
permits since 1993. Early Winters
Outfitting’s term permit expired in
2004.
In order for an outfitter-guide
business to be successful, and justify
financial commitments, such as
purchasing and caring for stock animals,
and hiring experienced guides, these
businesses need multi-year permits.
Multi-year permits are needed to
respond to the applications, and
continue the professional relationship
that has been established with these
companies to provide service to the
public.
The Forest Service has identified a
need for outfitting and guiding services
on these Districts to access to the
Wilderness and backcountry. The
‘‘Assessment for Need For Outfitting/
Guiding Assistance, Okanogan National
Forest, Chelan Ranger District Portion of
Wenatchee National Forest North of
Lake Chelan’’ (the Needs Assessment)
was completed by the Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests in 1996.
That document provides overall
guidance relating to issuing permits.
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Notices
The Needs Assessment states that the
relative public need for outfitting/
guiding assistance ranges from high to
low based on the type of activity. The
justification for authorizing outfitting
and guiding operations is proportional
to the public’s need for outfittingguiding assistance. Appendix H in the
assessment (page H–1) shows that pack
animal trips and drop camps carry a
high rating for skills and equipment,
knowledge, safety risk, unique services
provided, and wilderness dependency.
In addition Okanogan National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan,
1989, standard and guideline MA 15B21Q, requires retention of the current
number and type of outfitter guide
authorizations and the current amount
of priority use allocated to outfitter
guides. The Wenatchee National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan,
1990, as amended (which covers the
portion of the permit areas on the
Chelan Ranger District) states that
outfitter guide permits will be issued
when appropriate to the goals of
wilderness management and where
compatible with Wilderness
management objectives, and existing
visitor use.
Valley Ranger District, with some
continuing onto the Tonasket and
Chelan Districts. It includes all of the
Pasayten and Lake Chelan/Sawthooth
Wildernesses, the North Cascades
Highway Corridor, the Sawtooth
Backcountry, the North Summit, and
some National Forest System land
adjacent to these areas. There would be
no changes in permit areas from the
areas recently permitted in the past.
Reserved camps would be assigned to
the horse and mule packers to allow
closer monitoring and modification.
Proposed camp locations would include
Bald Mountain, Sheep Mountain,
Beaver Creek, Crow Lake, and Whistler.
The reserved camps would be primarily
used for guided horseback riding trips
with meals, cook, and most or all
camping gear provided. Camp locations
for all other trips would not be assigned.
Proposed Action
The Forest Supervisor for the
Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests proposes to issue ten-year,
special use permits to each of the
following companies: North Cascade
Safari, Cascade Wilderness Outfitters,
North Cascade Outfitters, Early Winters
Outfitting, Rocking Horse Ranch,
Sawtooth Outfitters, Backcountry
Burros, Deli-Llamas, and Pasayten
Llamas in 2006. These outfitters take
people into the Wilderness and other
remote areas using pack and riding
animals (horses, mules, llamas, and
burros). Most of the trips are severalnight camping expeditions, although
some of the use involves day-rides. The
outfitters offer client a variety of triptypes to meet needs, expectations, and
budgets. Trips range from guided
horseback riding trips with meals, cook,
and most or all camping gear provided
to day trips, and also include simply
dropping gear off for hikers.
The maximum number of client days
that would be divided between these
outfitters, or replacements for these
outfitters who have met the
requirements for term permits, would be
4,900, which is the total of the highest
annual number of client days each has
used over the past ten years.
The analysis area (which includes all
the permit areas) is located on the
Okanogan and Wentachee National
Forests. Most of it is on the Methow
The Responsible Official will decide
whether or not to issue term permits to
the outfitters described in the proposed
action. He will also decide what, if any,
mitigation measures and monitoring are
needed. The criteria that will be used to
select between the alternatives are: (1)
To what extent the alternative is
consistent with Okanogan Forest Plan
standard and guideline 15B 21–Q, and
the standard and guideline from the
Wenatchee Forest Plan, (2) to what
extent the alternative provides enough
stability to the businesses to allow them
to make the financial commitments
necessary to continue to provide service
to the public, (3) to what extent the
action meets the needs identified in the
1996 Outfitter Guide Needs Assessment,
and (4) the effects of the alternative on
the environment.
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:12 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is James L.
Boynton, Forest Supervisor, Okanogan
and Wenatchee National Forests, 215
Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Scoping Process
In November 2000, as scoping letter
was sent to people and organizations
that had expressed interest, in addition
to those of the Methow Valley Ranger
District mailing list. An updated letter is
being sent concurrently with this notice
of intent to everyone who received the
first letter, in addition to everyone on
the Tonasket, Methow Valley, and
Chelan Ranger Districts mailing lists.
All comments received will be used to
identify issues, and develop
alternatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36113
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The Forest Service is
seeking public and agency comment on
the proposed action to identify major
issues to be analyzed in depth and
assistance in identifying possible
alternatives to be evaluated. Comments
received to this notice, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed action,
and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, whoever those commenters
will not have standing for appeal under
36 CFR 215.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F.Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
36114
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Notices
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is
required to respond to comments and
responses received during the comment
period that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS
and applicable laws, regulations, and
policies considered in making a
decision regarding the proposal. The
Forest Supervisor for the Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests will be the
Federal responsible official for this EIS
and its Record of Decision, and his
decision will be subject to appeal
pursuant to 36 CFR 215.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21).
G. Elton Thomas,
Deputy forest Supervisor, OkanoganWenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05–12290 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Colville Resource Advisory Committee
(RAC)
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Colville Resource
Advisory Committee will meet on
Thursday, June 30, 2005, at the Spokane
Community College, Colville Campus,
Dominion Room 985 South Elm Street,
Colville, Washington. The meeting will
begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at 4 p.m.
Agenda items include: (1) Welcome and
introduction of new members serving on
the Colville Resource Advisory
Committee. (2) Review and approve
meeting notes from July 29, 2004,
meeting (3) Fiscal Year 2006 Title II
projects review and recommendation to
the forest designated Federal official on
Stevens, Ferry and Pend Oreille
Counties applications; and (4) Public
Forum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting
to Rick Brazell, designated Federal
official or to Diana Baxter, Public Affairs
Officer, Colville National Forest, 765 S.
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:12 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Main, Colville, Washington 99114, (509)
684–7000.
Dated: June 13, 2005.
Rick Brazell,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05–12179 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
Dated: June 16, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–12264 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce has
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Fishing Capacity Reduction
Program Buyback Requests.
Form Number(s): None.
OMB Approval Number: 0648–0376.
Type of Request: Regular submission.
Burden Hours: 38,563.
Number of Respondents: 878.
Average Hours Per Response: 2 hours
and 20 minutes.
Needs and Uses: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) has
established a program to reduce excess
fishing capacity by paying fishermen (1)
to surrender their fishing permits or (2)
both surrender their permits and either
scrap their vessels or restrict vessel
titles to prevent fishing. NMFS proposes
to extend the currently approved
collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or
households; State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Frequency: Annually, monthly, and
on occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, FAX number (202) 395–7285, or
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce has
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Vessel and Gear Marking.
Form Number(s): None.
OMB Approval Number: 0648–0373.
Type of Request: Regular submission.
Burden Hours: 7,134.
Number of Respondents: 8,973.
Average Hours Per Response: 34
minutes.
Needs and Uses: Under current
regulations, fishing vessels permitted for
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species must
display their official vessel numbers on
their vessels to assist law enforcement
in monitoring fishing and other
activities. Floatation devices attached to
certain fishing gear must also be marked
with the vessel’s official numbers to
identify catch that is buoyed. This is
also necessary for law enforcement
purposes.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or
households.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, FAX number (202) 395–7285, or
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36112-36114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Methow Valley Ranger District, Okanogan & Wenatchee National
Forests, WA, Pack Stock Outfitter Guide Special Use Permits
Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the USDA, Forest Service will
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement that will evaluate
alternatives to provide pack stock outfitter and guide services on the
Methow Valley, Chelan and Tonasket Ranger Districts of the Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests. The proposed action is to issue ten-year,
pack stock outfitter and guide special use permits to nine companies to
operate on these three Districts. A maximum of 4,900 client days will
be shared between these companies. Outfitting and guiding would take
place both in the Lake Chelan-Sawtooth and Pasayten Wildernesses, and
outside of wilderness.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by July 15, 2005. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
December 2005 and the final environmental impact statement is expected
May 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Jennifer Zbyszewski, Recreation &
Wilderness Program Manager, Methow Valley Ranger District, 24 W.
Chewuch Rd., Winthrop WA 98862, or by e-mail to jzbyszewski@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions to Jennifer
Zbyszewski, Recreation & Wilderness Program, Manager, Methow Valley
Ranger District, 24 W. Chewuch Rd., Winthrop WA 98862, (509) 996-4021,
or by e-mail to jzbyszewski@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purposed and Need for Action
Nine companies have applied to the Forest Service for ten year
permits to outfit and guide on the Methow Valley, Chelan and/or
Tonasket Ranger District of the Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests. North Cascade Safari, Cascade Wilderness Outfitters, North
Cascade Outfitters, Rocking Horse Ranch, and Backcountry Burros have
operated under five-year term special use permits in the past, but
these permits expired in 2000. The companies have been operating under
short-term permits since then. Each of these companies have operated
for at least 20 years on the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.
Deli-Llamas and Pasayten Llamas have operated under short-term permits
since 1993. Sawtooth Outfitters has operated under short-term permits
since 1993. Early Winters Outfitting's term permit expired in 2004.
In order for an outfitter-guide business to be successful, and
justify financial commitments, such as purchasing and caring for stock
animals, and hiring experienced guides, these businesses need multi-
year permits. Multi-year permits are needed to respond to the
applications, and continue the professional relationship that has been
established with these companies to provide service to the public.
The Forest Service has identified a need for outfitting and guiding
services on these Districts to access to the Wilderness and
backcountry. The ``Assessment for Need For Outfitting/Guiding
Assistance, Okanogan National Forest, Chelan Ranger District Portion of
Wenatchee National Forest North of Lake Chelan'' (the Needs Assessment)
was completed by the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests in 1996.
That document provides overall guidance relating to issuing permits.
[[Page 36113]]
The Needs Assessment states that the relative public need for
outfitting/guiding assistance ranges from high to low based on the type
of activity. The justification for authorizing outfitting and guiding
operations is proportional to the public's need for outfitting-guiding
assistance. Appendix H in the assessment (page H-1) shows that pack
animal trips and drop camps carry a high rating for skills and
equipment, knowledge, safety risk, unique services provided, and
wilderness dependency.
In addition Okanogan National Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan, 1989, standard and guideline MA 15B-21Q, requires retention of
the current number and type of outfitter guide authorizations and the
current amount of priority use allocated to outfitter guides. The
Wenatchee National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, 1990, as
amended (which covers the portion of the permit areas on the Chelan
Ranger District) states that outfitter guide permits will be issued
when appropriate to the goals of wilderness management and where
compatible with Wilderness management objectives, and existing visitor
use.
Proposed Action
The Forest Supervisor for the Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests proposes to issue ten-year, special use permits to each of the
following companies: North Cascade Safari, Cascade Wilderness
Outfitters, North Cascade Outfitters, Early Winters Outfitting, Rocking
Horse Ranch, Sawtooth Outfitters, Backcountry Burros, Deli-Llamas, and
Pasayten Llamas in 2006. These outfitters take people into the
Wilderness and other remote areas using pack and riding animals
(horses, mules, llamas, and burros). Most of the trips are several-
night camping expeditions, although some of the use involves day-rides.
The outfitters offer client a variety of trip-types to meet needs,
expectations, and budgets. Trips range from guided horseback riding
trips with meals, cook, and most or all camping gear provided to day
trips, and also include simply dropping gear off for hikers.
The maximum number of client days that would be divided between
these outfitters, or replacements for these outfitters who have met the
requirements for term permits, would be 4,900, which is the total of
the highest annual number of client days each has used over the past
ten years.
The analysis area (which includes all the permit areas) is located
on the Okanogan and Wentachee National Forests. Most of it is on the
Methow Valley Ranger District, with some continuing onto the Tonasket
and Chelan Districts. It includes all of the Pasayten and Lake Chelan/
Sawthooth Wildernesses, the North Cascades Highway Corridor, the
Sawtooth Backcountry, the North Summit, and some National Forest System
land adjacent to these areas. There would be no changes in permit areas
from the areas recently permitted in the past.
Reserved camps would be assigned to the horse and mule packers to
allow closer monitoring and modification. Proposed camp locations would
include Bald Mountain, Sheep Mountain, Beaver Creek, Crow Lake, and
Whistler. The reserved camps would be primarily used for guided
horseback riding trips with meals, cook, and most or all camping gear
provided. Camp locations for all other trips would not be assigned.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is James L. Boynton, Forest Supervisor,
Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA
98801.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will decide whether or not to issue term
permits to the outfitters described in the proposed action. He will
also decide what, if any, mitigation measures and monitoring are
needed. The criteria that will be used to select between the
alternatives are: (1) To what extent the alternative is consistent with
Okanogan Forest Plan standard and guideline 15B 21-Q, and the standard
and guideline from the Wenatchee Forest Plan, (2) to what extent the
alternative provides enough stability to the businesses to allow them
to make the financial commitments necessary to continue to provide
service to the public, (3) to what extent the action meets the needs
identified in the 1996 Outfitter Guide Needs Assessment, and (4) the
effects of the alternative on the environment.
Scoping Process
In November 2000, as scoping letter was sent to people and
organizations that had expressed interest, in addition to those of the
Methow Valley Ranger District mailing list. An updated letter is being
sent concurrently with this notice of intent to everyone who received
the first letter, in addition to everyone on the Tonasket, Methow
Valley, and Chelan Ranger Districts mailing lists. All comments
received will be used to identify issues, and develop alternatives.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The Forest
Service is seeking public and agency comment on the proposed action to
identify major issues to be analyzed in depth and assistance in
identifying possible alternatives to be evaluated. Comments received to
this notice, including the names and addresses of those who comment,
will be considered part of the public record on this proposed action,
and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and considered, whoever those commenters
will not have standing for appeal under 36 CFR 215.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F.Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it
is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if
[[Page 36114]]
comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to
comments and responses received during the comment period that pertain
to the environmental consequences discussed in the draft EIS and
applicable laws, regulations, and policies considered in making a
decision regarding the proposal. The Forest Supervisor for the Okanogan
and Wenatchee National Forests will be the Federal responsible official
for this EIS and its Record of Decision, and his decision will be
subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21).
G. Elton Thomas,
Deputy forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-12290 Filed 6-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M