Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska, Subpart D; Seasonal Adjustments-Copper and Stikine Rivers, 36033-36036 [05-12159]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
authorization will be forwarded to the
Office of the Provost Marshal General
(OPMG), 2800 Army Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20310–2800.
§ 637.19
Overseas MP desk.
The recording of telephone
communications at MP operations desks
outside the United States will be
conducted within restrictions contained
in international agreements between the
U.S. and host nations.
§ 637.20
Security surveillance systems.
Closed circuit video recording
systems, to include those with an audio
capability, may be employed for
security purposes in public places so
long as notices are conspicuously
displayed at all entrances, providing
persons who enter with a clear warning
that this type of monitoring is being
conducted.
§ 637.21 Recording interviews and
interrogations.
The recording of interviews and
interrogations by military police
personnel is authorized, provided the
interviewee is on notice that the
testimony or statement is being
recorded. This procedure is a longaccepted law enforcement procedure,
not precluded by DA policies pertaining
to wiretap, investigative monitoring,
and eavesdrop activities.
Subpart B—[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 05–12310 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–05–022]
Safety Zone: Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of Implementation of
final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
implementing safety zones for annual
fireworks displays in the Captain of the
Port Detroit Zone during June 2005.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life and property on
navigable waters during these events.
These safety zones will restrict vessel
traffic from a portion of the Captain of
the Port Detroit Zone.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Effective from 9:30 p.m. (local)
on June 23, 2005, to 10:30 p.m. (local)
on June 24, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG Cynthia Channell, Chief of
Waterways Management, Sector Detroit,
110 Mt. Elliott Ave., Detroit, MI at (313)
568–9580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard is implementing three permanent
safety zones in 33 CFR 165.907
(published May 21, 2001, in the Federal
Register, 66 FR 27868), for fireworks
displays in the Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone during June 2005. The
following safety zones are in effect for
fireworks displays occurring in the
month of June 2005:
33 CFR 165.907(a)(1): Bay-Rama
Fishfly Festival, New Baltimore, MI.
This safety zone encompasses all waters
off New Baltimore City Park, Lake St.
Clair-Anchor Bay bounded by the arc of
a circle with a 300-yard radius with its
center located at approximate position
42°41′N, 082°44′W. This § 165.907(a)(1)
safety zone will be enforced on June 23,
2005, from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
33 CFR 165.907(a)(3): Sigma Gamma
Assoc., Grosse Pointe Farms, MI. This
safety zone encompasses all waters off
Ford’s Cove, Lake St. Clair bounded by
the arc of a circle with a 300-yard radius
with its center in approximate position
42°27′N, 082°52′W. This § 165.907(a)(3)
safety zone will be enforced on June 24,
2003 from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
33 CFR 165.907(a)(13): St. Clair
Shores Fireworks, St. Clair Shores, MI.
This safety zone encompasses all waters
of Lake St. Clair within a 300-yard
radius of the fireworks barge in
approximate position 42°32′N,
082°51′W, about 1000 yards east of
Veterans Memorial Park (off Masonic
Rd.), St. Clair Shores, MI. This
§ 165.907(a)(13) safety zone will be
enforced on June 24, 2005, from 10 p.m.
to 10:30 p.m.
In order to ensure the safety of
spectators and transiting vessels, these
safety zones will be in effect for the
duration of the events. In the event that
these safety zones affect shipping,
commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
Detroit to transit through the safety
zone.
Requests must be made in advance
and approved by the Captain of the Port
before transits will be authorized. The
Captain of the Port may be contacted via
U.S. Coast Guard Group Detroit on
channel 16, VHF–FM. The Coast Guard
will give notice to the public via a
Broadcast to Mariners that the
regulation is in effect.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36033
Dated: June 9, 2005.
P.W. Brennan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 05–12355 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska, Subpart D;
Seasonal Adjustments—Copper and
Stikine Rivers
Forest Service, USDA; Fish
and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Seasonal adjustments.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: This provides notice of the
Federal Subsistence Board’s in-season
management actions to protect sockeye
salmon escapement in the Copper River,
while still providing for a subsistence
harvest opportunity and to provide for
a more efficient harvest method for
chinook salmon in the Stikine River.
The revised fishing schedule for the
Chitina Subdistrict of the Copper River
and net mesh size revision will provide
an exception to the Subsistence
Management Regulations for Public
Lands in Alaska, published in the
Federal Register on March 21, 2005.
Those regulations established seasons,
harvest limits, methods, and means
relating to the taking of fish and
shellfish for subsistence uses during the
2005 regulatory year.
DATES: The fishing schedule for the
Chitina Subdistrict of the Upper Copper
River District is effective June 2, 2005,
through August 2, 2005. The mesh size
revision for the Stikine River is effective
June 4, 2005, through June 20, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas H. Boyd, Office of Subsistence
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, telephone (907) 786–3888. For
questions specific to National Forest
System lands, contact Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Manager, USDA—
Forest Service, Alaska Region,
telephone (907) 786–3592.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Title VIII of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
36034
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126)
requires that the Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretaries) implement a joint program
to grant a preference for subsistence
uses of fish and wildlife resources on
public lands in Alaska, unless the State
of Alaska enacts and implements laws
of general applicability that are
consistent with ANILCA and that
provide for the subsistence definition,
preference, and participation specified
in Sections 803, 804, and 805 of
ANILCA. In December 1989, the Alaska
Supreme Court ruled that the rural
preference in the State subsistence
statute violated the Alaska Constitution
and, therefore, negated State compliance
with ANILCA.
The Department of the Interior and
the Department of Agriculture
(Departments) assumed, on July 1, 1990,
responsibility for implementation of
Title VIII of ANILCA on public lands.
The Departments administer Title VIII
through regulations at title 50, part 100
and title 36, part 242 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR). Consistent
with subparts A, B, and C of these
regulations, as revised January 8, 1999
(64 FR 1276), the Departments
established a Federal Subsistence Board
to administer the Federal Subsistence
Management Program. The Board’s
composition includes a Chair appointed
by the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture; the Alaska Regional
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
the Alaska Regional Director, National
Park Service; the Alaska State Director,
Bureau of Land Management; the Alaska
Regional Director, Bureau of Indian
Affairs; and the Alaska Regional
Forester, USDA Forest Service. Through
the Board, these agencies participate in
the development of regulations for
subparts A, B, and C, which establish
the program structure and determine
which Alaska residents are eligible to
take specific species for subsistence
uses, and the annual subpart D
regulations, which establish seasons,
harvest limits, and methods and means
for subsistence take of species in
specific areas. Subpart D regulations for
the 2005 fishing seasons, harvest limits,
and methods and means were published
on March 21, 2005 (70 FR 13377).
Because this action relates to public
lands managed by an agency or agencies
in both the Departments of Agriculture
and the Interior, identical closures and
adjustments would apply to 36 CFR part
242 and 50 CFR part 100.
The Alaska Department of Fish and
Game (ADF&G), under the direction of
the Alaska Board of Fisheries (BOF),
manages sport, commercial, personal
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
use, and State subsistence harvest on all
lands and waters throughout Alaska.
However, on Federal lands and waters,
the Federal Subsistence Board
implements a subsistence priority for
rural residents as provided by Title VIII
of ANILCA. In providing this priority,
the Board may, when necessary,
preempt State harvest regulations for
fish or wildlife on Federal lands and
waters.
These actions are authorized and in
accordance with 50 CFR 100.19(d–e)
and 36 CFR 242.19(d–e).
Copper River—Chitina Subdistrict
In December 2001, the Board adopted
regulatory proposals establishing a new
Federal subsistence fishery in the
Chitina Subdistrict of the Copper River.
This fishery is open to Federally
qualified users having customary and
traditional use of salmon in this
Subdistrict. The State conducts a
personal use fishery in this Subdistrict
that is open to all Alaska residents.
Management of the fishery is based on
the numbers of salmon returning to the
Copper River. A larger than predicted
salmon run will allow additional fishing
time. A smaller than predicted run will
require restrictions to achieve upriver
passage and spawning escapement
goals. A run that approximates the preseason forecast will allow fishing to
proceed similar to the pre-season
schedule with some adjustments made
to fishing time based on in-season data.
Adjustments to the preseason schedule
are expected as a normal function of an
abundance-based management strategy.
State and Federal managers, reviewing
and discussing all available in-season
information, will make these
adjustments.
While Federal and State regulations
currently differ for this Subdistrict, the
Board indicated that Federal in-season
management actions regarding fishing
periods were expected to mirror State
actions. The State established a
preseason schedule of allowable fishing
periods based on daily projected sonar
estimates. The preseason schedule was
intended to distribute the harvest
throughout the salmon run and provide
salmon for upriver subsistence fisheries
and the spawning escapement. Data
regarding the salmon return to the
Copper River is now available from
estimates made by the Miles Lake sonar.
Data from the sonar indicate that there
are now sufficient salmon in the Copper
River to allow additional fishing time in
the Chitina Subdistrict, provide for the
needs of upper Copper River users and
achieve spawning escapement
objectives. Shown below are the fishing
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
schedule openings for the Chitina
Subdistrict of the Copper River:
Monday, June 6, 12:01 a.m.–Sunday,
June 12, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, June 13, 12:01 a.m.–Sunday,
June 19, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, June 20, 12:01 a.m.–Sunday,
June 26, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, June 27, 12:01 a.m.–Sunday,
July 3, 11:59 p.m.
Tuesday, July 5, 12:01 a.m.–Sunday,
July 10, 11:59 p.m.
Wednesday, July 13, 8 a.m.–Sunday,
July 17, 11:59 p.m.
Tuesday, July 19, 12:01 a.m.–Sunday,
July 24, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, July 25, 12:01 a.m.–Friday,
September 30, 11:59 p.m.
State personal use and Federal
subsistence fisheries in this Subdistrict
close simultaneously by regulation on
September 30, 2005. No deviation from
this date is anticipated.
Stikine River
The Pacific Salmon Commission,
established by treaty between the
United States and Canada in 1985, and
its Panels, address the management of
transboundary salmon stocks, including
those of the Stikine River. The
Transboundary Panel approves a joint
management plan for enhancement and
harvest of Chinook, sockeye and coho
salmon populations. Each year the
Transboundary Technical Committee
meets prior to the season to update joint
management and enhancement plans,
develop run forecasts and determine
new parameters for input into the
inseason run forecast model, referred to
as the Stikine Management Model.
Fisheries targeting the Stikine River
stocks are addressed in Annex IX of the
U.S.-Canada Treaty.
In December of 2003, the Board
approved a regulation, pending
coordination with the PSC process,
which provided for methods, a season
and guideline harvest limits for Stikine
River chinook salmon. Included in the
methods was a maximum gillnet mesh
size of 51⁄2 inches for all species. The
PSC reached agreement on the chinook
fisheries in 2005.
Chinook salmon populations in the
Stikine River are healthy. Gillnet mesh
restrictions are not necessary for
management of the very limited Stikine
River subsistence salmon fisheries. The
fisheries are constrained by having
permits valid for only 15-day time
periods, restricting the length of gillnets
to 15 fathoms, specifying a season,
specifying individual harvests (5
chinook) and providing for an overall
guideline harvest for each species (125
chinook). The increased mesh size will
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
promote efficiency by allowing users to
use a gillnet sized appropriately to
harvest chinook salmon. Although the
Southeast Regional Advisory Council
requested an unlimited mesh size,
Canada requested an 8 inch maximum
mesh size. The Stikine River U.S.—
Canada Chinook in-river test fishing
program uses a 71⁄4 inch gillnet mesh to
harvest Chinook salmon. Limiting the
mesh size to 8 inches should not result
in reduced chinook harvest for
subsistence fishing.
The Federal Subsistence Board
approved a larger mesh size to 8 inches
for gillnets during the remainder of the
chinook salmon season on the Stikine
River in 2005. This is effective June 4,
through June 20, 2005.
The Board finds that additional public
notice and comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) for these adjustments are
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to the public interest. Lack of
appropriate and immediate conservation
measures could seriously affect the
continued viability of fish populations,
adversely impact future subsistence
opportunities for rural Alaskans, and
would generally fail to serve the overall
public interest. Therefore, the Board
finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) to waive additional public
notice and comment procedures prior to
implementation of these actions and
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make
this rule effective as indicated in the
DATES section.
Conformance With Statutory and
Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
A Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) was published on
February 28, 1992, and a Record of
Decision on Subsistence Management
for Federal Public Lands in Alaska
(ROD) was signed April 6, 1992. The
final rule for Subsistence Management
Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska,
subparts A, B, and C (57 FR 22940,
published May 29, 1992), implemented
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program and included a framework for
an annual cycle for subsistence hunting
and fishing regulations. A final rule that
redefined the jurisdiction of the Federal
Subsistence Management Program to
include waters subject to the
subsistence priority was published on
January 8, 1999 (64 FR 1276.)
Compliance With Section 810 of
ANILCA
The intent of all Federal subsistence
regulations is to accord subsistence uses
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
of fish and wildlife on public lands a
priority over the taking of fish and
wildlife on such lands for other
purposes, unless restriction is necessary
to conserve healthy fish and wildlife
populations. A Section 810 analysis was
completed as part of the FEIS process.
The final Section 810 analysis
determination appeared in the April 6,
1992, ROD, which concluded that the
Federal Subsistence Management
Program, under Alternative IV with an
annual process for setting hunting and
fishing regulations, may have some local
impacts on subsistence uses, but the
program is not likely to significantly
restrict subsistence uses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The adjustment and emergency
closures do not contain information
collection requirements subject to Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
Other Requirements
The adjustments have been exempted
from OMB review under Executive
Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of flexibility analyses for
rules that will have a significant effect
on a substantial number of small
entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or
governmental jurisdictions. The exact
number of businesses and the amount of
trade that will result from this Federal
land-related activity is unknown. The
aggregate effect is an insignificant
economic effect (both positive and
negative) on a small number of small
entities supporting subsistence
activities, such as boat, fishing gear, and
gasoline dealers.
The number of small entities affected
is unknown; however, the effects will be
seasonally and geographically-limited in
nature and will likely not be significant.
The Departments certify that the
adjustments will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities within the meaning of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Under
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It
does not have an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36035
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
preference on public lands. The scope of
this program is limited by definition to
certain public lands. Likewise, the
adjustments have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
The Service has determined and
certifies pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that the adjustments will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation is by Federal agencies,
and no cost is involved to any State or
local entities or Tribal governments.
The Service has determined that the
adjustments meet the applicable
standards provided in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988,
regarding civil justice reform.
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the adjustments do not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA
precludes the State from exercising
subsistence management authority over
fish and wildlife resources on Federal
lands. Cooperative salmon run
assessment efforts with ADF&G will
continue.
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), Executive
Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
evaluated possible effects on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have
determined that there are no effects. The
Bureau of Indian Affairs is a
participating agency in this rulemaking.
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. This Executive
Order requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. As these
actions are not expected to significantly
affect energy supply, distribution, or
use, they are not significant energy
actions and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
Drafting Information
Bill Knauer drafted this document
under the guidance of Thomas H. Boyd,
of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Taylor Brelsford,
Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management; Rod Simmons, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; Nancy Swanton, Alaska
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
36036
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 22, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Regional Office, National Park Service;
Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional Office,
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Steve
Kessler, USDA–Forest Service, provided
additional guidance.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd,
3101–3126; 18 U.S.C. 3551–3586; 43 U.S.C.
1733.
Dated: June 6, 2005.
Thomas H. Boyd,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: June 6, 2005.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA–Forest
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–12159 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans
CFR Correction
In Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 52 (§§ 52.01 to
52.1018), revised as of July 1, 2004,
§ 52.21 is corrected by removing
paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(h)(1) and (2).
[FR Doc. 05–55508 Filed 6–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
HARRY S. TRUMAN SCHOLARSHIP
FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 1801
Scholar Accountability Policy
Harry S. Truman Scholarship
Foundation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule adopts the
Truman Scholarship Foundation
[Foundation] Scholar Accountability
Policy. This Accountability Policy
clarifies and standardizes Foundation
rules governing accountability of an
individual selected as a Harry S.
Truman Scholar [Scholar] to fulfill his
or her obligation to become employed in
public service. It requires any Scholar
who is selected after January 2005 and
who is not employed in public service
for three of the seven years immediately
following completion of his or her
Foundation-funded graduate education
to repay to the Foundation an amount
equal to the Scholarship stipends
received, with interest and any costs of
collection.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Jun 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
DATES:
This rule is effective July 22,
2005.
The final rule and
supplemental information will also be
posted on the Foundation Web site with
links from the For Scholars, For
Candidates, and For Fac Reps sections.
They also may be obtained by written
request to Louis H. Blair, Executive
Secretary, Harry S. Truman Scholarship
Foundation, 712 Jackson Place, NW.,
Washington, DC 20006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Louis Blair, Harry S. Truman
Scholarship Foundation, 202–395–4831.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
1. Background of the Harry S. Truman
Scholarship
2. History of the Accountability Policy
3. Summary of Comments Received and
Foundation Responses
4. Text of Final Rule
1. Harry S. Truman Scholarship
Foundation Directives
The Harry S. Truman Memorial
Scholarship Act [Act] honored former
President Truman by creating ‘‘a
perpetual education scholarship
program to develop increased
opportunities for young Americans to
prepare for and pursue careers in public
service.’’ 20 U.S.C. 2001. These
scholarships are administered by the
Foundation, whose purpose is to
‘‘[encourage] young people to recognize
and provide service in the highest and
best traditions of the American political
system at all levels of government * * *
[and] to develop increased opportunities
for young Americans to prepare and
pursue careers in public service.’’ 20
U.S.C. 2001. The Act authorizes the
Foundation to ‘‘award scholarships to
persons who demonstrate outstanding
potential for and who plan to pursue a
career in public service.’’ 20 U.S.C.
2005(a)
Under this scholarship program, the
Foundation annually selects Scholars
from among outstanding college juniors
nominated by their college or
university. Those selected receive
educational stipends from the
Foundation.
The Act requires those nominated and
selected for a Truman Scholarship to
‘‘[indicate] a serious intent to enter the
public service upon the completion of
his or her educational program.’’ 20
U.S.C. 2005(d). The Foundation finds
evidence of this intent in the nominee’s
previous record of public service and in
his or her signing of a scholarship
acceptance agreement, which in past
years acknowledged an obligation to
‘‘enter public service immediately upon
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
graduation or immediately upon
completion of any judicial clerkships(s)
after graduation.’’ A Scholar may
continue to receive Foundation
financial support only while ‘‘devoting
full time to study or research designed
to prepare him or her for a career in
public service.’’ 20 U.S.C. 2008(a).
While the Foundation’s regulations
provide that it may suspend or
terminate the Scholarship for a student
who has a ‘‘* * * loss of interest in a
career in public service,’’ 45 CFR
1801.61, it has only done so rarely. As
detailed below, the Foundation has
lacked an effective mechanism for
assuring that Scholars who receive the
Foundation’s financial support are
actually employed in public service.
2. History of the Accountability Policy
While many Scholars pursue a public
service career after completing their
graduate education, a significant
number do not. Because the Foundation
has not imposed any reporting
requirements on those whose
scholarship funding has been
completed, the Foundation’s knowledge
of former Scholars’ career choices relies
largely on informal contacts with former
Scholars. Additionally, a mid-1990’s
survey (with a 60% response rate) of
former Scholars revealed that two-thirds
of the Scholars with law school degrees
were employed in the private sector at
the time of the survey. One quarter of
former Scholars with other kinds of
graduate degrees were employed in the
private sector. This survey confirmed
the impressions gleaned from less
formal contacts.
The Foundation, using the authority
grated in 20 U.S.C. 2012, made several
program changes to address the issue of
Scholar Accountability.
First, in 1991 the Foundation began
selecting Scholars later in their
academic career in anticipation that
their career plans would be more
definitive.
Second, the Foundation established
increased public service opportunities
for Scholars through programming,
Foundation staffing, and enhanced
Scholar networks. The Foundation
instituted Truman Scholars Leadership
Week, Summer Institute, the Public
Service Law Conference, and the
Truman Fellows program in an effort to
increase awareness of additional public
service opportunities. The Foundation
has also expanded its Web site to
include fellowship, scholarship, and
employment listings as well as a Scholar
database. The Foundation has
established relationships with graduate
schools, graduate fellowships, and other
public service programs in an effort to
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36033-36036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12159]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska,
Subpart D; Seasonal Adjustments--Copper and Stikine Rivers
AGENCIES: Forest Service, USDA; Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Seasonal adjustments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This provides notice of the Federal Subsistence Board's in-
season management actions to protect sockeye salmon escapement in the
Copper River, while still providing for a subsistence harvest
opportunity and to provide for a more efficient harvest method for
chinook salmon in the Stikine River. The revised fishing schedule for
the Chitina Subdistrict of the Copper River and net mesh size revision
will provide an exception to the Subsistence Management Regulations for
Public Lands in Alaska, published in the Federal Register on March 21,
2005. Those regulations established seasons, harvest limits, methods,
and means relating to the taking of fish and shellfish for subsistence
uses during the 2005 regulatory year.
DATES: The fishing schedule for the Chitina Subdistrict of the Upper
Copper River District is effective June 2, 2005, through August 2,
2005. The mesh size revision for the Stikine River is effective June 4,
2005, through June 20, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas H. Boyd, Office of Subsistence
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, telephone (907) 786-3888.
For questions specific to National Forest System lands, contact Steve
Kessler, Subsistence Program Manager, USDA--Forest Service, Alaska
Region, telephone (907) 786-3592.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
[[Page 36034]]
(ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126) requires that the Secretary of the
Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) implement a
joint program to grant a preference for subsistence uses of fish and
wildlife resources on public lands in Alaska, unless the State of
Alaska enacts and implements laws of general applicability that are
consistent with ANILCA and that provide for the subsistence definition,
preference, and participation specified in Sections 803, 804, and 805
of ANILCA. In December 1989, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the
rural preference in the State subsistence statute violated the Alaska
Constitution and, therefore, negated State compliance with ANILCA.
The Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture
(Departments) assumed, on July 1, 1990, responsibility for
implementation of Title VIII of ANILCA on public lands. The Departments
administer Title VIII through regulations at title 50, part 100 and
title 36, part 242 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Consistent
with subparts A, B, and C of these regulations, as revised January 8,
1999 (64 FR 1276), the Departments established a Federal Subsistence
Board to administer the Federal Subsistence Management Program. The
Board's composition includes a Chair appointed by the Secretary of the
Interior with concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture; the Alaska
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the Alaska Regional
Director, National Park Service; the Alaska State Director, Bureau of
Land Management; the Alaska Regional Director, Bureau of Indian
Affairs; and the Alaska Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service. Through
the Board, these agencies participate in the development of regulations
for subparts A, B, and C, which establish the program structure and
determine which Alaska residents are eligible to take specific species
for subsistence uses, and the annual subpart D regulations, which
establish seasons, harvest limits, and methods and means for
subsistence take of species in specific areas. Subpart D regulations
for the 2005 fishing seasons, harvest limits, and methods and means
were published on March 21, 2005 (70 FR 13377).
Because this action relates to public lands managed by an agency or
agencies in both the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior,
identical closures and adjustments would apply to 36 CFR part 242 and
50 CFR part 100.
The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), under the direction
of the Alaska Board of Fisheries (BOF), manages sport, commercial,
personal use, and State subsistence harvest on all lands and waters
throughout Alaska. However, on Federal lands and waters, the Federal
Subsistence Board implements a subsistence priority for rural residents
as provided by Title VIII of ANILCA. In providing this priority, the
Board may, when necessary, preempt State harvest regulations for fish
or wildlife on Federal lands and waters.
These actions are authorized and in accordance with 50 CFR
100.19(d-e) and 36 CFR 242.19(d-e).
Copper River--Chitina Subdistrict
In December 2001, the Board adopted regulatory proposals
establishing a new Federal subsistence fishery in the Chitina
Subdistrict of the Copper River. This fishery is open to Federally
qualified users having customary and traditional use of salmon in this
Subdistrict. The State conducts a personal use fishery in this
Subdistrict that is open to all Alaska residents.
Management of the fishery is based on the numbers of salmon
returning to the Copper River. A larger than predicted salmon run will
allow additional fishing time. A smaller than predicted run will
require restrictions to achieve upriver passage and spawning escapement
goals. A run that approximates the pre-season forecast will allow
fishing to proceed similar to the pre-season schedule with some
adjustments made to fishing time based on in-season data. Adjustments
to the preseason schedule are expected as a normal function of an
abundance-based management strategy. State and Federal managers,
reviewing and discussing all available in-season information, will make
these adjustments.
While Federal and State regulations currently differ for this
Subdistrict, the Board indicated that Federal in-season management
actions regarding fishing periods were expected to mirror State
actions. The State established a preseason schedule of allowable
fishing periods based on daily projected sonar estimates. The preseason
schedule was intended to distribute the harvest throughout the salmon
run and provide salmon for upriver subsistence fisheries and the
spawning escapement. Data regarding the salmon return to the Copper
River is now available from estimates made by the Miles Lake sonar.
Data from the sonar indicate that there are now sufficient salmon in
the Copper River to allow additional fishing time in the Chitina
Subdistrict, provide for the needs of upper Copper River users and
achieve spawning escapement objectives. Shown below are the fishing
schedule openings for the Chitina Subdistrict of the Copper River:
Monday, June 6, 12:01 a.m.-Sunday, June 12, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, June 13, 12:01 a.m.-Sunday, June 19, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, June 20, 12:01 a.m.-Sunday, June 26, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, June 27, 12:01 a.m.-Sunday, July 3, 11:59 p.m.
Tuesday, July 5, 12:01 a.m.-Sunday, July 10, 11:59 p.m.
Wednesday, July 13, 8 a.m.-Sunday, July 17, 11:59 p.m.
Tuesday, July 19, 12:01 a.m.-Sunday, July 24, 11:59 p.m.
Monday, July 25, 12:01 a.m.-Friday, September 30, 11:59 p.m.
State personal use and Federal subsistence fisheries in this
Subdistrict close simultaneously by regulation on September 30, 2005.
No deviation from this date is anticipated.
Stikine River
The Pacific Salmon Commission, established by treaty between the
United States and Canada in 1985, and its Panels, address the
management of transboundary salmon stocks, including those of the
Stikine River. The Transboundary Panel approves a joint management plan
for enhancement and harvest of Chinook, sockeye and coho salmon
populations. Each year the Transboundary Technical Committee meets
prior to the season to update joint management and enhancement plans,
develop run forecasts and determine new parameters for input into the
inseason run forecast model, referred to as the Stikine Management
Model. Fisheries targeting the Stikine River stocks are addressed in
Annex IX of the U.S.-Canada Treaty.
In December of 2003, the Board approved a regulation, pending
coordination with the PSC process, which provided for methods, a season
and guideline harvest limits for Stikine River chinook salmon. Included
in the methods was a maximum gillnet mesh size of 5\1/2\ inches for all
species. The PSC reached agreement on the chinook fisheries in 2005.
Chinook salmon populations in the Stikine River are healthy.
Gillnet mesh restrictions are not necessary for management of the very
limited Stikine River subsistence salmon fisheries. The fisheries are
constrained by having permits valid for only 15-day time periods,
restricting the length of gillnets to 15 fathoms, specifying a season,
specifying individual harvests (5 chinook) and providing for an overall
guideline harvest for each species (125 chinook). The increased mesh
size will
[[Page 36035]]
promote efficiency by allowing users to use a gillnet sized
appropriately to harvest chinook salmon. Although the Southeast
Regional Advisory Council requested an unlimited mesh size, Canada
requested an 8 inch maximum mesh size. The Stikine River U.S.--Canada
Chinook in-river test fishing program uses a 7\1/4\ inch gillnet mesh
to harvest Chinook salmon. Limiting the mesh size to 8 inches should
not result in reduced chinook harvest for subsistence fishing.
The Federal Subsistence Board approved a larger mesh size to 8
inches for gillnets during the remainder of the chinook salmon season
on the Stikine River in 2005. This is effective June 4, through June
20, 2005.
The Board finds that additional public notice and comment
requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) for these
adjustments are impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest. Lack of appropriate and immediate conservation measures could
seriously affect the continued viability of fish populations, adversely
impact future subsistence opportunities for rural Alaskans, and would
generally fail to serve the overall public interest. Therefore, the
Board finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
additional public notice and comment procedures prior to implementation
of these actions and pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make this rule
effective as indicated in the DATES section.
Conformance With Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance
A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on
February 28, 1992, and a Record of Decision on Subsistence Management
for Federal Public Lands in Alaska (ROD) was signed April 6, 1992. The
final rule for Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in
Alaska, subparts A, B, and C (57 FR 22940, published May 29, 1992),
implemented the Federal Subsistence Management Program and included a
framework for an annual cycle for subsistence hunting and fishing
regulations. A final rule that redefined the jurisdiction of the
Federal Subsistence Management Program to include waters subject to the
subsistence priority was published on January 8, 1999 (64 FR 1276.)
Compliance With Section 810 of ANILCA
The intent of all Federal subsistence regulations is to accord
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife on public lands a priority over
the taking of fish and wildlife on such lands for other purposes,
unless restriction is necessary to conserve healthy fish and wildlife
populations. A Section 810 analysis was completed as part of the FEIS
process. The final Section 810 analysis determination appeared in the
April 6, 1992, ROD, which concluded that the Federal Subsistence
Management Program, under Alternative IV with an annual process for
setting hunting and fishing regulations, may have some local impacts on
subsistence uses, but the program is not likely to significantly
restrict subsistence uses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The adjustment and emergency closures do not contain information
collection requirements subject to Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Other Requirements
The adjustments have been exempted from OMB review under Executive
Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will have a
significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, which
include small businesses, organizations, or governmental jurisdictions.
The exact number of businesses and the amount of trade that will result
from this Federal land-related activity is unknown. The aggregate
effect is an insignificant economic effect (both positive and negative)
on a small number of small entities supporting subsistence activities,
such as boat, fishing gear, and gasoline dealers.
The number of small entities affected is unknown; however, the
effects will be seasonally and geographically-limited in nature and
will likely not be significant. The Departments certify that the
adjustments will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), this rule is not a
major rule. It does not have an effect on the economy of $100 million
or more, will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the Secretaries to administer a
subsistence preference on public lands. The scope of this program is
limited by definition to certain public lands. Likewise, the
adjustments have no potential takings of private property implications
as defined by Executive Order 12630.
The Service has determined and certifies pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that the adjustments will
not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local or
State governments or private entities. The implementation is by Federal
agencies, and no cost is involved to any State or local entities or
Tribal governments.
The Service has determined that the adjustments meet the applicable
standards provided in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order
12988, regarding civil justice reform.
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the adjustments do not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State from
exercising subsistence management authority over fish and wildlife
resources on Federal lands. Cooperative salmon run assessment efforts
with ADF&G will continue.
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), Executive Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we
have evaluated possible effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that there are no effects. The Bureau of Indian
Affairs is a participating agency in this rulemaking.
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 on
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or
use. This Executive Order requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. As these actions are
not expected to significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or
use, they are not significant energy actions and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
Drafting Information
Bill Knauer drafted this document under the guidance of Thomas H.
Boyd, of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Taylor Brelsford,
Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land Management; Rod Simmons, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nancy Swanton, Alaska
[[Page 36036]]
Regional Office, National Park Service; Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Steve Kessler, USDA-Forest
Service, provided additional guidance.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd, 3101-3126; 18 U.S.C.
3551-3586; 43 U.S.C. 1733.
Dated: June 6, 2005.
Thomas H. Boyd,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: June 6, 2005.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 05-12159 Filed 6-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-55-P