Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 35770-35771 [05-12117]
Download as PDF
35770
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 21, 2005 / Notices
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6470).
(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Pub. L. 104–13, Section 2, 109
Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to issue
two notices seeking public comment on
information collection activities before
OMB may approve paperwork packages.
44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5,
1320.8(d)(1), 1320.12. On April 12,
2005, FRA published a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register soliciting comment
on ICRs that the agency was seeking
OMB approval. 70 FR 19142. FRA
received no comments in response to
this notice. Accordingly, DOT
announces that these information
collection activities have been reevaluated and certified under 5 CFR
1320.5(a) and forwarded to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12(c).
Before OMB decides whether to
approve these proposed collections of
information, it must provide 30 days for
public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5
CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires
OMB to approve or disapprove
paperwork packages between 30 and 60
days after the 30 day notice is
published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)–(c); 5 CFR
1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30
day notice informs the regulated
community to file relevant comments
and affords the agency adequate time to
digest public comments before it
renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug.
29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should
submit their respective comments to
OMB within 30 days of publication to
best ensure having their full effect. 5
CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60 FR 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995.
The summaries below describe the
nature of the information collection
requirements (ICRs) and the expected
burden. The revised requirements are
being submitted for clearance by OMB
as required by the PRA.
Title: Supplemental Qualifications
Statement for Railroad Safety Inspector
Applicants.
OMB Control Number: 2130–0517.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Form Number: FRA–F–120.
Abstract: The Supplemental
Qualifications Statement for Railroad
Safety Inspector Applicants is an
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:07 Jun 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
information collection instrument used
by FRA to gather additional background
data so that FRA can evaluate the
qualifications of applicants for the
position of Railroad Safety Inspector.
The questions cover a wide range of
general and specialized skills, abilities,
and knowledge of the five types of
railroad safety inspector positions.
Annual Estimated Burden: 6,000
hours.
Title: Railroad Worker Protection (49
CFR 214).
OMB Control Number: 2130–0539.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Railroads.
Form Number: FRA F 6180.119.
Abstract: This rule establishes
regulations governing the protection of
railroad employees working on or near
railroad tracks. The regulation requires
that each railroad devise and adopt a
program of on-track safety to provide
employees working along the railroad
with protection from the hazards of
being struck by a train or other on-track
equipment. Elements of this on-track
safety program include an on-track
safety manual; a clear delineation of
employers’ responsibilities, as well as
employees’ rights and responsibilities
thereto; well-defined procedures for
communication and protection; and
annual on-track safety training. The
program adopted by each railroad is
subject to review and approval by FRA.
Part 214 regulations have been deemed
different enough from the Part 213
regulations as to require a separate and
distinct reporting form (new Form FRA
F 6180.119). Regardless of discipline,
the FRA inspector will complete the
new Roadway Workplace Safety
Violation Report Form (FRA F 6180.119)
when recommending civil penalties for
Part 214 infractions.
Annual Estimated Burden: 589,840
hours.
Addressee: Send comments regarding
this information collection to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
Seventeenth Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20503, Attention: FRA Desk Officer.
Comments are invited on the
following: Whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
Department’s estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collections;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collections of information
on respondents, including the use of
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on June 10,
2005.
D.J. Stadtler,
Director, Office of Budget, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–12116 Filed 6–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
from certain requirements of its safety
regulations. The individual petition is
described below including, the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
BNSF Railway Company
[Docket Number FRA–2004–19949]
The BNSF Railway Company (BNSF)
seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of 49 CFR Part 232,
Brake System Safety Standards for
Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains
and Equipment. Specifically,
§ 232.215(a), transfer train brake tests for
trains moving from Old South Yard to
New South Yard in Houston, Texas, a
distance of approximately 1⁄4 mile.
New South Yard is located
approximately one-fourth of a mile
south of Old South Yard. Both yards are
approximately one mile in length. The
two yards are separated by a one-fourth
mile section of main track. Train speed
in both yards is 10 mph. Maximum
speed on the main track is 20 mph, but
trains operating between the two yards
operate at 10 mph and must be prepared
to stop within one-half the range of
vision. The grade of the main track is
level, sight distance is unobstructed,
and there are no at-grade road crossings
or grade separations on the main track.
After a review of the particulars at
this location, FRA determined that any
cars moved between Old South Yard
and New South Yard constitutes a train
movement, thus requiring an air brake
test. BNSF contends that an air brake
test is not required at this particular
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 21, 2005 / Notices
location for cars being moved from one
yard to the other. They base their
opinion on the multi-factor analysis as
presented in the preamble to the Power
Brake Regulations published in the
Federal Register, January 17, 2001. See
66 FR 4148. BNSF believes all of the
moves between the two yards are
switching moves.
Based on FRA’s ruling, BNSF is
requesting that a waiver be granted for
cars moving from Old South Yard to
New South Yard without performing an
air brake test, to facilitate the movement
of cars through this already congested
area. BNSF claims they have been
operating within and between the yards
since 1998, using only the locomotive’s
brakes to control the movement. In
addition to moving cars between the
two yards, the main track is often used
while switching service is occurring
within each yard, due to the small size
of the yards. BNSF does not believe that
there are any inherent safety risks or
additional costs involved if the petition
is granted.
Interested parties are invited to
submit written comments to FRA. All
written communications concerning this
petition should identify the appropriate
docket number (e.g., Docket Number
FRA–2004–19949) and must be
submitted in triplicate to the Associate
Administrator for Safety, Federal
Railroad Administration, 400 7th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Comments received within 30 days of
the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before any final
action is taken. Although FRA does not
anticipate scheduling a public hearing
in connection with these proceedings, if
any interested party desires an
opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA in writing before the
end of the comment period and specify
the basis for their request. All written
communications concerning these
proceedings are available for
examination during regular business
hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the Central
Docket Management Facility, Room PL–
401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. All documents
in the public docket are also available
for inspection and copying on the
Internet at the docket facility’s Web site
https://dms.dot.gov. Anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000,
VerDate jul<14>2003
22:07 Jun 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) at https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on June 13,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–12117 Filed 6–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit
(Renewal With Amendment to Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2002–
13398)
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit
(HARTLine), located in Tampa, Florida,
seeks renewal, with amendment, of the
conditions of its permanent waiver of
compliance from Title 49 of the CFR for
continued operation of its TECO Line
streetcar system at a ‘‘limited
connection’’ with the CSXT Railroad.
See Statement of Agency Policy
Concerning Jurisdiction Over the Safety
of Railroad Passenger Operations and
Waivers Related to Shared Use of the
Tracks of the General Railroad System
by Light Rail and Conventional
Equipment, 65 FR 42529 (July 10, 2000);
see also Joint Statement of Agency
Policy Concerning Shared Use of the
Tracks of the General Railroad System
by Conventional Railroads and Light
Rail Transit Systems, 65 FR 42626 (July
10, 2000).
In September 2004 the FRA Railroad
Safety Board granted an extension of
HARTLine’s original waiver and its
conditions for a period of eight months.
HARTLine is now notifying the FRA of
some modifications to its operating plan
and equipment, and is requesting a
permanent waiver of compliance, to
include these modifications.
Based on the foregoing and with some
modifications, HARTLine is seeking to
renew its existing waiver of compliance
from the provisions of the Code of
Federal Regulations, 49 CFR part 219-
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35771
Control of Alcohol and Drug Use, 49
CFR part 223 Safety Glazing Standards,
and 49 CFR part 238-Passenger
Equipment Safety Standards.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communication concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2002–
13398) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 (Plaza Level),
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Communications received within
30 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–12120 Filed 6–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) has
received a request for a waiver of
compliance with certain requirements of
its safety standards. The individual
petition is described below, including
the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the
relief being requested, and the
petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief.
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35770-35771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12117]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of its safety regulations. The individual petition is
described below including, the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
BNSF Railway Company
[Docket Number FRA-2004-19949]
The BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of 49 CFR Part 232, Brake System Safety Standards
for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment. Specifically,
Sec. 232.215(a), transfer train brake tests for trains moving from Old
South Yard to New South Yard in Houston, Texas, a distance of
approximately \1/4\ mile.
New South Yard is located approximately one-fourth of a mile south
of Old South Yard. Both yards are approximately one mile in length. The
two yards are separated by a one-fourth mile section of main track.
Train speed in both yards is 10 mph. Maximum speed on the main track is
20 mph, but trains operating between the two yards operate at 10 mph
and must be prepared to stop within one-half the range of vision. The
grade of the main track is level, sight distance is unobstructed, and
there are no at-grade road crossings or grade separations on the main
track.
After a review of the particulars at this location, FRA determined
that any cars moved between Old South Yard and New South Yard
constitutes a train movement, thus requiring an air brake test. BNSF
contends that an air brake test is not required at this particular
[[Page 35771]]
location for cars being moved from one yard to the other. They base
their opinion on the multi-factor analysis as presented in the preamble
to the Power Brake Regulations published in the Federal Register,
January 17, 2001. See 66 FR 4148. BNSF believes all of the moves
between the two yards are switching moves.
Based on FRA's ruling, BNSF is requesting that a waiver be granted
for cars moving from Old South Yard to New South Yard without
performing an air brake test, to facilitate the movement of cars
through this already congested area. BNSF claims they have been
operating within and between the yards since 1998, using only the
locomotive's brakes to control the movement. In addition to moving cars
between the two yards, the main track is often used while switching
service is occurring within each yard, due to the small size of the
yards. BNSF does not believe that there are any inherent safety risks
or additional costs involved if the petition is granted.
Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to FRA.
All written communications concerning this petition should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Docket Number FRA-2004-19949) and must
be submitted in triplicate to the Associate Administrator for Safety,
Federal Railroad Administration, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590-0001. Comments received within 30 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before any final action is taken. Although
FRA does not anticipate scheduling a public hearing in connection with
these proceedings, if any interested party desires an opportunity for
oral comment, they should notify FRA in writing before the end of the
comment period and specify the basis for their request. All written
communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. All documents in the public docket
are also available for inspection and copying on the Internet at the
docket facility's Web site https://dms.dot.gov. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000, (Volume 65, Number
70; Pages 19477-78) at https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on June 13, 2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. 05-12117 Filed 6-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P