Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Utah Health Information Network, 35454-35455 [05-12049]

Download as PDF 35454 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such response will be considered by the Commission if received no later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting the response to the complaint will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter both an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or cease and desist orders or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 14, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–12037 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Die Products Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on May 26, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Die Products Consortium (‘‘DPC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, GERMANY; and Philips Semiconductors, Inc., San Jose, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, National Semiconductor Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; and August Technology, Bloomington, MN have withdrawn as parties to this venture. The following member has VerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Jun 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 changed its name: Motorola SPS to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and DPC intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On November 15, 1999, DPC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 26, 2000 (65 FR 39429). The last notification was filed with the Department on May 19, 2003. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 10, 2003 (68 FR 34644). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–12047 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Truck Essential Power Systems Efficiency Improvements for Medium Duty Trucks Notice is hereby given that, on May 12, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Truck Essential Power Systems Efficiency Improvements for Medium Duty Trucks (‘‘TEPS2’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Caterpillar Inc., Mossville, IL; Emerson Electric Co., St. Louis, MO; Engineered Machine Products, Inc., Escanaba, MI; and Dana Corporation, Ottawa Lake, MI. The general area of TEPS2’s planned activity is to focus on the optimization of sophisticated power management strategies of various electrically driven engine accessories to PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 replace the typical arrangement of belt/ gear driven components. Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–12048 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11—M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Utah Health Information Network Notice is hereby given that, on June 1, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act;’’), Utah Health Information Network (‘‘UHIN’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Utah Health Information Network, Murray, UT. The nature and scope of UHIN’s standards development activities are: to develop, maintain and promote voluntary, consensus-based interoperability standards related to the exchange of electronic healthcare data, including but not limited to, standardization of data sets, specifications, network architecture, requirements, services, methods and procedures that apply to facilities, personnel, systems, service providers, operators, and others handling healthcare information. Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–12049 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–57,078] Allied Bias Products; Jersey City, NJ; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 29, 2005, in response to a petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers at Allied Bias Products, Jersey City, New Jersey. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June, 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–3171 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Conclusion Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,871] Block Corporation; Amory, MS; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of May 16, 2005 a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was signed on April 27, 2005 and published in the Federal Register on May 16, 2005 (70 FR 25859). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Block Corporation, Amory, VerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Jun 17, 2005 Mississippi engaged in production of men’s trouser samples was denied because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’ group eligibility requirement of section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met, nor was there a shift in production from that firm to a foreign country. The investigation revealed that the preponderance in employment declines is attributed to a domestic shift in production of men’s trouser samples. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that the layoffs at the subject firm are attributable to an increase in imports of men’s trouser samples. A company official was contacted regarding the above allegations. The company official confirmed what was revealed during the initial investigation. In particular, the official stated that even though the subject firm has been importing a small portion of men’s trouser samples, domestic production of men’s trouser samples have not declined during the relevant time period. Furthermore, the official stated that the same amount of pant samples that were produced at the subject facility are now produced at another domestic facility. Jkt 205001 After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of June, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–3168 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P U.S. Headquarters, a subsidiary of Creo, Inc., New York, New York. The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TA– W–55,607A) which expires on April 5, 2007. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of June 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–3173 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,674] CTS Corporation; CTS Communications Components, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Excel and Spherion Albuquerque, New Mexico; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at CTS Corporation, CTS Communications Components, Inc., including on-site leased workers of Excel and Spherion, Albuquerque, New Mexico. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department’s determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–56,674; CTS Corporation, CTS Communications Components, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of Excel and Spherion, Albuquerque, New Mexico (June 7, 2005). DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–57,158] Creo Americas, Inc., U.S. Headquarters, a Subsidiary of Creo, Inc.; Billerica, MA; Located in New York, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of June 2005. Timothy Sullivan, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–3165 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 12, 2005 in response to a worker petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers at Creo Americas, Inc., PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35455 E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 117 (Monday, June 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35454-35455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Utah Health Information Network

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 1, 2005, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act;''), Utah Health Information Network 
(``UHIN'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Utah Health 
Information Network, Murray, UT. The nature and scope of UHIN's 
standards development activities are: to develop, maintain and promote 
voluntary, consensus-based interoperability standards related to the 
exchange of electronic healthcare data, including but not limited to, 
standardization of data sets, specifications, network architecture, 
requirements, services, methods and procedures that apply to 
facilities, personnel, systems, service providers, operators, and 
others handling healthcare information.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-12049 Filed 6-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.