Cottonwood Energy Company LP, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings, 35245-35246 [E5-3131]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 116 / Friday, June 17, 2005 / Notices not be served on persons other and the Applicant. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at https:// www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the intervention or protests. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlinSupport@ferc.gov. or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Linda Mitry, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–3130 Filed 6–16–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EC05–92–000, et al.] Cottonwood Energy Company LP, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings June 10, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. 1. Cottonwood Energy Company LP, Magnolia Energy LP, Redbud Energy LP, Baja California Power, Inc., La Rosita Energy B.V., InterGen Aztec Energy III B.V. [Docket No. EC05–92–000] Take notice that on June 3, 2005, Cottonwood Energy Company LP, Magnolia Energy LP, Redbud Energy LP, Baja California Power, Inc., La Rosita VerDate jul<14>2003 17:59 Jun 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 Energy, B.V. and InterGen Aztec Energy III B.V. (the Applicants) submitted an application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power Act for authorization of a disposition of jurisdictional facilities related to the corporate reorganization of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij), a Netherlands company, and The Shell Transport & Trading Company, p.l.c., a United Kingdom company (together, the Shell Parents), which hold indirect upstream ownership interests in Applicants. The Applicants state that as a result of the proposed reorganization, the Shell Parents will become wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of a new parent company, which, in turn, will be owned by the existing shareholders of the Shell Parents. Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 24, 2005. 2. Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc., Sempra Energy Power I [Docket No. EC05–93–000] Take notice that on June 3, 2005, Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc. (REPG) and Sempra Energy Power I (SEP I) (collectively, Applicants) filed with the Commission a joint application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power Act for Commission approval of the transfer of indirect interests in jurisdictional facilities. Applicants state that the disposition involves the sale by REPG to SEP I of REPG’s 50 percent membership interest in El Dorado Energy, LLC (El Dorado). Applicants further state that El Dorado owns and operates the El Dorado generating station, a nominally rated 480 MW electric generating facility located near Boulder City, Nevada, which is interconnected with the transmission system operated by the Nevada Power Company. Applicants request privileged treatment of Exhibit I, the Purchase and Sale Agreement between REPG and SEP I. Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 24, 2005. 3. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [Docket No. ER05–1061–000] Take notice that on June 1, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) submitted revisions to the PJM amended and restated operating agreement (operating agreement) concerning the confidentiality and scheduling and dispatch provisions of the Operating Agreement. PJM states that the proposed revisions expand the scope of sections 18.17.1(b) and 1.76(a) of the PJM OA, respectively, to enable the office of the PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35245 interconnection to provide member confidential documents, data or other information to reliability coordinators that are responsible for overseeing electric system reliability operations of regions outside of the PJM service territory, and enable the office of the interconnection to recognize transmission constraints on all coordinated flowgates external to the PJM region. PJM requests an effective date of August 1, 2005. PJM states that copies of this filing have been served on all PJM members and the utility regulatory commissions in the PJM region. Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 22, 2005. 4. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket No. ER05–1081–000] Take notice that on June 6, 2005, California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) submitted Amendment No. 71 to its FERC Electric Tariff. CAISO states that Amendment No. 71 would modify the ISO Tariff in the following respects: (1) Adding a provision to allow the CAISO to disclose to the Commission confidential or commercially sensitive information when requested by the Commission during the course of an investigation or otherwise, without providing notice of the request to affected market participants in advance of the disclosure; and (2) adding a provision to allow the ISO to share critical operating information, system models and planning data to other Western Electricity Coordinating restrictions. Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 20, 2005. Standard Paragraph Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding, interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline need not be served on persons other than the Applicant. E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 35246 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 116 / Friday, June 17, 2005 / Notices The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at https:// www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to long on and submit the intervention or protests. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the intervention or protests to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available to review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TYY, call (202) 502–8659. Linda Mitry, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–3131 Filed 6–16–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket Nos. CP05–13–000; CP05–11–000; CP05–12–000; CP05–14–000] Ingleside Energy Center, LLC San Patricio Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Proposed Ingleside Energy Center Lng Terminal And Pipeline Project June 10, 2005. The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared this final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal and natural gas pipeline facilities proposed by Ingleside Energy Center, LLC and San Patricio Pipeline, LLC (collectively referred to as Ingleside San Patricio) in the above-referenced dockets. The final EIS was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the National VerDate jul<14>2003 17:59 Jun 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The staff concludes that approval of the proposed project with appropriate mitigating measures, as recommended, would have limited adverse environmental impact. The final EIS also evaluates alternatives to the proposal, including system alternatives, alternative sites for the LNG import terminal, and pipeline alternatives. Ingleside San Patricio’s proposed facilities would have a nominal output of about 1.0 billion cubic feet of imported natural gas per day to the U.S. market. In order to provide LNG import, storage, and pipeline transportation services, Ingleside San Patricio requests Commission authorization to construct, install, and operate an LNG terminal and natural gas pipeline facilities. The final EIS addresses the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the following LNG terminal and natural gas pipeline facilities in San Patricio and Nueces Counties, Texas: • A new marine terminal basin connected to the La Quinta Channel that would include a ship maneuvering area and one protected berth to unload up to 140 LNG ships per year; • Two double containment LNG storage tanks with a nominal working volume of approximately 160,000 cubic meters (1,006,000 barrels equivalent); • LNG vaporization and processing equipment; • 26.4 miles of 26-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline; and • nine interconnects with existing intrastate and interstate pipelines, and related meter stations. As proposed, the project would be integrated with the adjacent Occidental Chemical Company manufacturing complex in order for the two facilities to offset the other’s respective heating and cooling needs. The use of the chemical manufacturing complex’s cooling water would serve as a source of vaporization heat. The final EIS has been placed in the public files of the FERC and is available for public inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–8371. A limited number of copies of the final EIS are available from the Public Reference Room identified above. In addition, copies of the final EIS have been mailed to federal, state, and local agencies; public interest groups; individuals and affected landowners who requested a copy of the final EIS; libraries; newspapers; and parties to this proceeding. PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, no agency decision on a proposed action may be made until 30 days after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publishes a notice of availability of a final EIS. However, the CEQ regulations provide an exception to this rule when an agency decision is subject to a formal internal appeal process which allows other agencies or the public to make their views known. In such cases, the agency decision may be made at the same time the notice of the final EIS is published, allowing both periods to run concurrently. The Commission decision for this proposed action is subject to a 30-day rehearing period. Additional information about the project is available from the Commission’s Office of External Affairs at 1–866–208–FERC or on the FERC Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov) using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Click on the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link, click on ‘‘General Search’’ and enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field. Be sure you have selected the appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at 1–866–208–3676 or for TTY, contact 202–502–8659. The ‘‘eLibrary’’ link on the FERC Internet Web site also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings. In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to the ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the FERC Internet Web site. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–3099 Filed 6–16–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 116 (Friday, June 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35245-35246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC05-92-000, et al.]


Cottonwood Energy Company LP, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate 
Filings

June 10, 2005.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Cottonwood Energy Company LP, Magnolia Energy LP, Redbud Energy LP, 
Baja California Power, Inc., La Rosita Energy B.V., InterGen Aztec 
Energy III B.V.

[Docket No. EC05-92-000]

    Take notice that on June 3, 2005, Cottonwood Energy Company LP, 
Magnolia Energy LP, Redbud Energy LP, Baja California Power, Inc., La 
Rosita Energy, B.V. and InterGen Aztec Energy III B.V. (the Applicants) 
submitted an application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power 
Act for authorization of a disposition of jurisdictional facilities 
related to the corporate reorganization of Royal Dutch Petroleum 
Company (N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij), a 
Netherlands company, and The Shell Transport & Trading Company, p.l.c., 
a United Kingdom company (together, the Shell Parents), which hold 
indirect upstream ownership interests in Applicants. The Applicants 
state that as a result of the proposed reorganization, the Shell 
Parents will become wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of a new parent 
company, which, in turn, will be owned by the existing shareholders of 
the Shell Parents.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 24, 2005.

2. Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc., Sempra Energy Power I

[Docket No. EC05-93-000]

    Take notice that on June 3, 2005, Reliant Energy Power Generation, 
Inc. (REPG) and Sempra Energy Power I (SEP I) (collectively, 
Applicants) filed with the Commission a joint application pursuant to 
section 203 of the Federal Power Act for Commission approval of the 
transfer of indirect interests in jurisdictional facilities. Applicants 
state that the disposition involves the sale by REPG to SEP I of REPG's 
50 percent membership interest in El Dorado Energy, LLC (El Dorado). 
Applicants further state that El Dorado owns and operates the El Dorado 
generating station, a nominally rated 480 MW electric generating 
facility located near Boulder City, Nevada, which is interconnected 
with the transmission system operated by the Nevada Power Company. 
Applicants request privileged treatment of Exhibit I, the Purchase and 
Sale Agreement between REPG and SEP I.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 24, 2005.

3. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER05-1061-000]

    Take notice that on June 1, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) 
submitted revisions to the PJM amended and restated operating agreement 
(operating agreement) concerning the confidentiality and scheduling and 
dispatch provisions of the Operating Agreement. PJM states that the 
proposed revisions expand the scope of sections 18.17.1(b) and 1.76(a) 
of the PJM OA, respectively, to enable the office of the 
interconnection to provide member confidential documents, data or other 
information to reliability coordinators that are responsible for 
overseeing electric system reliability operations of regions outside of 
the PJM service territory, and enable the office of the interconnection 
to recognize transmission constraints on all coordinated flowgates 
external to the PJM region. PJM requests an effective date of August 1, 
2005.
    PJM states that copies of this filing have been served on all PJM 
members and the utility regulatory commissions in the PJM region.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 22, 2005.

4. California Independent System Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER05-1081-000]

    Take notice that on June 6, 2005, California Independent System 
Operator Corporation (CAISO) submitted Amendment No. 71 to its FERC 
Electric Tariff. CAISO states that Amendment No. 71 would modify the 
ISO Tariff in the following respects: (1) Adding a provision to allow 
the CAISO to disclose to the Commission confidential or commercially 
sensitive information when requested by the Commission during the 
course of an investigation or otherwise, without providing notice of 
the request to affected market participants in advance of the 
disclosure; and (2) adding a provision to allow the ISO to share 
critical operating information, system models and planning data to 
other Western Electricity Coordinating restrictions.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. on June 20, 2005.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment 
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket 
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the 
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to 
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding, 
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline 
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.

[[Page 35246]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at https://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to long on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protests to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the 
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available to review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TYY, call (202) 502-8659.

Linda Mitry,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-3131 Filed 6-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.